Niche for Hybrid DMUs in Commuter Rail

Similar documents
Commuter Rail Vehicle Technology Analysis

Estimation of electrical losses in Network Rail Electrification Systems

Roma McKenzie-Campbell Amtrak, Project Manager. Caroline Ducas VHB, Senior Transit Planner. Boston, Massachusetts

Time (secs) Distance (feet) Accel (mphps) , , , , ,388 0.

Northwest Rail Environmental Evaluation. Governments Team. September 13, 2007

Hybrid Electric Solution for OEM Commercial Vans and Trucks Dr. Edward Lovelace

SFMTA Energy Use by Vehicle Type: Transit Investments vs Life Cycle Costs

FASTRACKS SYSTEM MAP: ALL CORRIDORS

Future of FrontRunner Final Report

Research Report. FD807 Electric Vehicle Component Sizing vs. Vehicle Structural Weight Report

The capital cost estimates do not include allowances for: ROW acquisition. Third-party mitigation works. Hazardous materials handling.

Zero-Emission Long-Haul Trucking Technologies

4 COSTS AND OPERATIONS

Future Fuel for Britain s Railways. Stephen Kent, University of Birmingham Shawn Laight, Land Transport Authority, Singapore

Options for Autonomous Power for the UK (Railways)

Feasibility of BEB s and Designing the Electric Road Map

TALENT 3 BATTERY TRAIN

Commuter Rail Vehicle Technology Analysis

THEFUTURERAILWAY THE INDUSTRY S RAIL TECHNICAL STRATEGY 2012 ENERGY

Commuter Rail in Connecticut: Present and Future. Robert Aloise H. James Boice Stephen Gazillo David Chase

Kenosha-Racine-Milwaukee (KRM)

MTA Long Island Rail Road (LIRR) and MTA Metro-North Railroad (MNR) System-wide Service Standards

TECHNICAL ISSUES IN DEVELOPMENT OF A VARIABLE HYBRIDITY FUELCELL LOCOMOTIVE

Additional Transit Bus Life Cycle Cost Scenarios Based on Current and Future Fuel Prices

Hydrogen Fuel Cells as Motive Power for Industrial Switcher Locomotives

Central City Line Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) Amendment Public Hearing. July 24, 2014

Electric Vehicle Cost-Benefit Analyses

Rocky Mountain. Corridor Input Team. Alternatives Overview. TEMS, Inc. / Quandel Consultants, LLC TEMS, Inc. / Quandel Consultants, LLC

Staff Contact: Carlos de Melo, Community Development Director, (650)

Fleet Strategy. Board Briefing December 13, Doug Kelsey Chief Operating Officer

I-26 Fixed Guideway Alternatives Analysis

Corporate presentation. LTS epropulsion

Fishing Vessel Energy Audit Project

ICF International and Cambridge Systematics. Rail Emissions Reduction Strategies

The Green Charge. Analysis of energy and CO 2 emissions data from the 2011 RAC Future Car Challenge

Energy Storage Commonality Military vs. Commercial Trucks

BRT: A solution to an urban transport crisis or a financial burden?

Ohio Passenger Rail Development. Northwest Ohio Passenger Rail Association

Siemens Hybrid Power Solutions. Technical and Financial Simulation Tools for High Penetration Hybrid Power Systems, Bangkok June 2015

Transit Access Study

Funding Scenario Descriptions & Performance

Tim Holton Advanced Propulsion Group, Jaguar Land Rover

Future Fuel for Britain s Railways

Energy Management for Regenerative Brakes on a DC Feeding System

Economics of Steam Traction for the Transportation of Coal by Rail. Chris Newman Beijing, China

ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA

Strategies for Sustainable Energy

DEMONSTRATION OF A HYDROGEN FUEL CELL LOCOMOTIVE

Appendix 6. Electrification Systems Technology Assessment. December 2010

PRASA Challenges & Opportunities Standing Committee on Appropriations 25 th March 2015

Comparing the powertrain energy and power densities of electric and gasoline vehicles

PHEV Operation Experience and Expectations

PHEV parcel delivery truck model - development and preliminary results

A vision for a zero emission container feeder vessel

Smartdrive SmartIQ Pro packs

Battery LHD Equipment

Innovative and Efficient Power Supply and Material Transportation Solutions for Canada s Mining Industry

Red Line Customer Capacity Update. Fiscal & Management Control Board September 19, 2016

6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

High-Speed Intercity Passenger Rail

Heavy Truck Efficiency: Implementing the Opportunities. 20 February, 2008 Michael Ogburn Rocky Mountain Institute

Maglev in the UK From strategic business plan to delivery. San Diego December 2008 Dr Alan James, CEO UK Ultraspeed

Fuel Cell Auxiliary Power Units: The Future of Idling Alternatives?

Real-world to Lab Robust measurement requirements for future vehicle powertrains

ACT 89: THE FOUNDATION TO REBUILD SEPTA FOR THE FUTURE JOSEPH M. CASEY GENERAL MANAGER

Yard Hostler Duty Cycle Summary Brad Rutledge Nov. 27, Introduction

Alf Kåre Ådnanes; ABB BU Marine & Cranes, 2010-November Energy efficiency and fuel consumption of marine and offshore vessels Technical possibilities

7/28/2017. Community Resiliency and Sustainability. David Kang. Vice Chancellor. Infrastructure and Safety PERCEPTION. Photo citation:

Peninsula Corridor Electrification Update Meeting

A Solar Enhanced, Zero- Waste Energy Management Solution How it Lowers Pump Jack Operating Costs

Truck Trolley System Siemens AG 2014

Infinite Drive. Energy Storage Mobile Applications. October 11, 2017

An Analytic Method for Estimation of Electric Vehicle Range Requirements, Electrification Potential and Prospective Market Size*

Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County Lee Gibson, Executive Director Roger Hanson, Senior Planner

Renewable Energy Integration: Wind, Solar and Energy Storage

Hydrogen Fuel Cells for Heavy Duty, Road and Rail Applications

Providing Choices for Sustainable Mobility. Takehito Yokoo Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc.

SEPULVEDA PASS CORRIDOR

Anna Petre. Manager Government Relations, Saab Automobile

Azure Dynamics is a leading developer of highly efficient, cost-effective and environmentally friendly hybrid-electric ( HEV ) and electric ( EV )

Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority

TPA Steering Committee for Tri-Rail Extension to Northern Palm Beach County. February 26, 2018

Bella Vista Bypass Benefit Cost Analysis

Introduction. Herbert Wancura Graz June 27, 2017

Plug-In Hybrids: Smart Strategies for Reducing Pollution Why Location and Charging Time Matter Dial-in Number: Access Code:

The evaluation of endurance running tests of the fuel cells and battery hybrid test railway train

Ph: October 27, 2017

Air. Goals: Improve statewide air quality Reduce greenhouse gas emissions 9 DRAFT DRAFT

Electric Vehicle Cost-Benefit Analyses

Sustainable Solutions for Powering Transit Buses

Battery Electric Bus Technology Review. Victoria Regional Transit Commission September 19, 2017 Aaron Lamb

Fuel Cells and Hydrogen in Long-Haul Trucks. Andrew Burke Hengbing Zhao 5/23/2017

FPL Electric Vehicle Initiatives

K. Shiokawa & R. Takagi Department of Electrical Engineering, Kogakuin University, Japan. Abstract

PEACHTREE CORRIDOR PARTNERSHIP. Current Status & Next Steps

New Flyer has 50 years of experience manufacturing zero-emission buses, has delivered over 7,300 buses powered by electric

Galapagos San Cristobal Wind Project. VOLT/VAR Optimization Report. Prepared by the General Secretariat

IEA ETSAP - Technology Brief T11 January Rail Transport

5.6 ENERGY IMPACT DISCUSSION. No Build Alternative

UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference. October 18, 2010

Transcription:

Defining i an Economic Niche for Hybrid DMUs in Commuter Rail Edward S. (Ned) Parker, P.E. LTK Engineering Services, Senior Engineer Denver, CO 1

Current Commuter Rail Technology Options Locomotive-Hauled Coaches LHC 2

Current Commuter Rail Technology Options Electric Multiple Units EMU 3

Current Commuter Rail Technology Options Diesel Multiple Units DMU 4

Emerging Commuter Rail Technology Hybrid Diesel Multiple Units HDMU Diesel-Electric Propulsion Regenerative Energy Capture Storage 5

Why is a Diesel Guy at Hydrail? Presenting an Economic Analysis: New Technology vs. Established On-board Power vs. External Power Similarities between hybrid drive cycle, regardless of energy source 6

Hybrid Drive Multiple Unit Propulsion Architecture Diesel Biodiesel LPG/CNG ENGINE STORAGE Hydrogen Other DRIVE 7

Energy Transfer Within a DMU Energy (kwh) 250 200 150 100 2 DMUs 10 Mile Route 11 Stops 60 MPH 236 kwh 41% LF 50 0 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 Time (sec) Drive Diesel Engine 8

Energy Transfer Within an HDMU Energy (kwh) 250 200 150 100 2 HDMUs 10 Mile Route 11 Stops 60 MPH 161 kwh 26% LF 50 0 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 Time (sec) Drive Diesel Generator Regeneration Storage 9

Potential Fuel Savings of HDMUs 50% ion in Fuel Consumption n with Hybrid Drive Reduct 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Engine Load Factor without Hybrid Drive 10

Potential Fuel Savings of HDMUs 40% with Reductio on in Fuel Co onsumption Hybrid Drive 30% 20% 10% 0% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% -10% -20% Percentage of Travel Time Spent in Heavy Acceleration 11

Relative Advantages of Commuter Rail Technologies Type Cap Ops Maint Comments LHC Low High Low Recent Starts EMU High Low High Established Services DMU Low Mid Mid New Starts and Feeder HDMU Mid Low High Potential of Improved Acceleration and Reduced Emissions 12

Hypothesis Life Cycle Cost Analysis Will Show When HDMU Operational Savings Outweigh Vehicle Capital and Maintenance Penalties Combinations of Route Profile, Ridership, and Service Frequency 13

Life Cycle Cost Analysis Capital Operations Maintenance Inflation Time LC(t) = Cap + (O&M)(1 + i) t 14

( Cap2 Cap1)ln(1 + i) log + 1 O & M 1 O & M 2 log(1 + i) Comparison of Technologies Through Life Cycle Costs t Payback: ( Cap2 Cap1)ln(1 + i) log O & M1 O & M 2 log(1 + i ) + 1 Life Cycle Cost ($M) 1,000 800 600 400 = 200 0 Payback Type 2 Lowest Cost Type 1 Lowest Cost 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Year of Service Vehicle Type 1 Vehicle Type 2 15

Capital Costs Unique To Each Technology Vehicles Traction Electrification System (TES) Maintenance Facility Electrification i or Fueling Station Civil Costs Such as Bridges and Retaining Walls Signal Impedance Bonds for EMUs 16

Fleet Capital Costs Vehicle Capital Costs from Recent Contracts and Estimates HDMU Estimated as DMU + $700K Trainsets Sized by Ridership and Service Frequency Fleet Sized By Travel Times, Turn Times, Service Frequency, and Spares 17

Sample Capital Costs Cap pital Costs Unique to Te echnology ($ M, 2009) 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 76 Round Trips per Day 23 Miles, 8 Stops, Up to 79 MPH 2-Car Consists 4-Car Consists 6-Car Consists EMU DMU HDMU EMU DMU HDMU EMU DMU HDMU Rolling Stock Facilities TES Signals 18

Non-Energy Operating Costs On-Board Staffing Labor Burdened for Indirect Costs Energy Route Travel Modeling, Service Plan Electric Power: $0.095 per kwh Diesel Fuel: $3.00 per gallon 19

Rolling Stock Maintenance Costs Daily Maintenance and Inspection Programmed Life Cycle Maintenance (LCM) Running Repair and Corrective Maintenance Heavy Repair Mid-Life Overhaul Assumed 30 Year Life 20

Maintenance Costs Traction Electrification System (TES) Traction Power Substations Autotransformers Overhead Contact System (OCS) 21

Sample O&M Costs Ann nual O&M Co ost ($M, 2009 9) 30 25 20 15 10 5 76 Round Trips per Day 23 Miles, 8 Stops, Up to 79 MPH 0 2-Car Consists 4-Car Consists 6-Car Consists EMU DMU HDMU EMU DMU HDMU EMU DMU HDMU Operations, Non-Energy Maintenance, Rolling Stock Operations, Energy Maintenance, TES 22

Capital and O&M Cost Differences Annua l O&M Cost Premium ($M M, 2009) 2 0-2 -4-6 -8-10 10 Mile Route 23 Mile Route 40 Mile Route EMU vs DMU 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 Initial Capital Cost Premium ($M, 2009) 2-Car Consists 4-Car Consists 6-Car Consists 23

Can EMUs be a Smart Investment? Annua l O&M Cost Premium ($M M, 2009) 2 0-2 -4-6 -8-10 -ROI +ROI 76 Round Trips per Day EMU vs DMU 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 Initial Capital Cost Premium ($M, 2009) 2-Car Consists 4-Car Consists 6-Car Consists 24

HDMU as an Investment Annua l O&M Cost Premium ($M M, 2009) 1.0 0.5 0.0-0.5-1.0-1.5 15-2.0 10 Mile Route 23 Mile Route 40 Mile Route HDMU vs DMU 0 10 20 30 40 50 Initial Capital Cost Premium ($M, 2009) 2-Car Consists 4-Car Consists 6-Car Consists 25

Payback on Short Route, High Utility Year of Service 50 40 30 20 Technology Cost Comparison Lowest Life Cycle Cost by Year of Service 76 Round Trips per Day 10 Miles, 11 Stops, 60 MPH 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Cars per Train DMU HDMU EMU 26

Short Route, Moderate Utility 50 40 Year of Service 30 20 10 0 Technology Cost Comparison Lowest Life Cycle Cost by Year of Service 24 Round Trips per Day 10 Miles, 11 Stops, 60 MPH 1 2 3 4 5 6 Cars per Train DMU HDMU EMU 27

Payback on Moderate Route Year of Service 50 40 30 20 Technology Cost Comparison Lowest Life Cycle Cost by Year of Service 76 Round Trips per Day 23 Miles, 8 Stops, Up to 79 MPH 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Cars per Train DMU HDMU EMU 28

Payback on Long Route 50 40 Year of Service 30 20 10 0 Technology Cost Comparison Lowest Life Cycle Cost by Year of Service 76 Round Trips per Day 40 Miles, 9 Stops, Up to 70 MPH 1 2 3 4 5 6 Cars per Train DMU HDMU EMU 29

EMU Target Service Short Routes High Vehicle Utility Significant Time Accelerating Moderately Spaced Stations High Track Speed 30

DMU Target Service Long Routes Low Vehicle Utility Short Consists Minimal Time Accelerating Widely Spaced Stations Moderate Track Speed Minimal Engine Transients 31

HDMU Target Service Short Routes ( 20 Miles) Moderate Vehicle Utility Short Consists ( 2 Vehicles) Significant Time Accelerating Closely Spaced Stations (< 2 Miles) Moderate Track Speed Significant Tractive Effort Transients 32

Questions? 33