Comparison of Clean Diesel Buses to CNG Buses

Similar documents
CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF PARTICULATE MATTER EMISSIONS FROM A CATALYZED TRAP EQUIPPED NATURAL GAS FUELED TRANSIT BUS

Emerging Technologies

TRANSIT BUS EMISSION STUDY COMPARISON OF EMISSIONS FROM DIESEL AND NATURAL GAS BUSES

Fuel Effects Issues for In-Use Diesel Applications

Heavy-Duty Diesel Emission Control Technologies to Achieve Future Emission Reduction Goals

Overview of Diesel Emission Control Retrofit Options

Diesel Retrofit Programs to Clean-up In-Use Vehicles - U.S. Experience

CNG Equipment Meeting Industry Needs. January 17, 2013 Trevin Fountain

How do you see the future? David Lynch Cummins Westport Inc.

NYCT OPERATING EXPERIENCE WITH HYBRID TRANSIT BUSES

IAPH Tool Box for Port Clean Air Programs

APBF-DEC Heavy Duty NOx Adsorber/DPF Project: Heavy Duty Linehaul Platform Project Update

CO2e Benefits of Reducing Black Carbon Emissions from U.S. Class 8 Trucks with Diesel Particulate Filters: A Preliminary Analysis

A Workshop On Reducing Emissions from Diesel Engines

Clean Fuels - A Critical Role in Clean Air. Understanding Urban Air Pollution and the Role of Diesel Exhaust Delhi, India - November

Highway Engine Regulations in the U.S.

The California Demonstration Program for Control of PM from Diesel Backup Generators (BUGs)

EVERY ALTERNATIVE. Next Generation Natural Gas Engine 4/23/2013. Why Natural Gas Engines for Buses & Trucks?

Additional Transit Bus Life Cycle Cost Scenarios Based on Current and Future Fuel Prices

The Effect of Biodiesel Fuel Blends on Diesel Particulate Filter Operation. Project Summary

NEXT GENERATION NATURAL GAS VEHICLE PROGRAM. Heavy Duty Rollout: Development of Stoichiometric Natural Gas Engines

Studies with Diesel Exhaust Particulate: Implications for the Potential Human Health Hazards of Nanoparticles

New Technology Diesel Engines: Eliminating NOx Emissions from Higher Biodiesel Blends in Un-modified Diesel Engines

Motor Vehicle Emissions and the Government Response

School Buses, Air Pollution & Children s Health

CONSENT DECREE ENVIRONMENTAL OFFSET PROJECTS CUMMINS INC. Table of Contents

Global Outlook for Vehicle In Use Emissions. Berlin, October 16, 2000

Overview of Worldwide Regulation of Diesel Vehicle and Engine Emissions

Natural Gas Powered Refuse Trucks: Cleaner-Cheaper-Domestic

CALIFORNIA S COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAM FOR REDUCING HEAVY- DUTY VEHICLE EMISSIONS

Green Drives 2015: CWI Natural Gas Engines. May 28, 2015

Environmental Analysis of Waste to Fuel Projects Well to Wheel.. Page: 1

Natural Gas Reliability Michael Hainzl Power Solutions Manager, Generac Power Systems. Date: 20 September 2017

Current Trends Liquid Natural Gas Locomotives

NEW DIESEL EMISSIONS CONTROL STRATEGY for US TIER 2

Development of CNG Market Using Flared Gas. Masami KOJIMA Oil, Gas and Mining Policy Division The World Bank

Methods to Find the Cost-Effectiveness of Funding Air Quality Projects

Diesel Engines: Environmental Impact and Control

Sponsor of 2007 Advancing The Choice Conference. PuriNOx Technology Low-Emission Diesel Fuel System

Why Natural Gas Refuse Trucks? Mike Cecere, Business Development Manager Solid Waste, Northeast Region

Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. Robust Low-cost EPA-Verified Systems for for Diesel Retrofit on on Heavy Duty Vehicles

Cummins Westport Near Zero Engines

Inspection of Vehicles Equipped with 2007 or Later EPA-Certified Engines

Background. NOx and PM Standards have driven diesel engine design for two decades

Biodiesel. Emissions. Biodiesel Emissions Compared to Diesel Fuel

Black Carbon Emissions From Diesel Engines - Technical And Policy Options For Reduction. Dr Richard O Sullivan 22 March 2012

Investigation of the Feasibility of Achieving Euro VI Heavy-Duty Diesel Emissions Limits by Advanced Emissions Controls

Attachment C: Benefit-Cost Analysis Spreadsheet

Future Challenges in Automobile and Fuel Technologies For a Better Environment. Diesel WG Report. September 25, 2000

A Summary Of CATF Field Investigations on the Effectiveness of Diesel Retrofits. Bruce Hill, Ph.D., Senior Scientist Athens, GA February 22, 2010

Development of vehicle emission factors using PEMS

In-Use Evaluation of Regulated, Ammonia and Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Heavy-Duty CNG Transit Buses Using a Portable FTIR and PEMS

NRDC. Diesel Retrofit & Replacement Strategies. Introduction

Advanced Emission Reduction Technologies for Locomotives: Fuels & Lubes

Advanced Engine Technology

In-Use Emissions Testing and Demonstration of Retrofit Technology for Control of On-Road Heavy-Duty Engines

Alternative Bus Technologies. Final Report

The Path To EPA Tier 4i - Preparing for. the 2011 transition

NYC s GREEN Fuel Supplier... March 2010

Special Measures for Metropolitan Air Quality Improvement

WRAP Oil & Gas: 2002/2005 and 2018 Area Source Controls Evaluation

INTERNATIONAL Diesel Engine Emissions Requirements & Technology

DIESEL EMISSIONS TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS

Use of a Diesel Fuel Processor for Rapid and Efficient Regeneration of Single Leg NOx Adsorber Systems

ACN April 2014

Oxidation Technologies for Stationary Rich and Lean Burn Engines

Successfully switching to CNG buses in Verona

CNG for Heavy Duty Fleets. cleanenergyfuels.com 1

IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR L TDI Volkswagen GENERATION 1 ENGINE Manual Transmission

School Buses, Air Pollution & Children s Health: Improving Children s Health & Local Air Quality by Reducing School Bus Emissions

Opportunities in CNG. March, 2015

Technology Choices. New Bus Purchases Fleet Make-up Engine Models & Years Driver Education & Support Duty Cycles Fuel Use & Storage

2008 Air Emissions Inventory SECTION 3 HARBOR CRAFT

Overview of HD Diesel Emission Control. Tim Johnson May 22, 2008

New Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel fuel and new engines and vehicles with advanced emissions control systems offer significant air quality improvement.

Stringent Emission Regulation in China

Emissions Characterization of Three High Efficiency Wood Boilers

Light Duty Truck Aftertreatment - Experience and Challenges. Fabien Redon, Houshun Zhang, Charlie Freese and Nabil Hakim. Detroit Diesel Corporation

Fueling the Future TM Diesel Reformers for On-board Hydrogen Applications in Exhaust Aftertreatment Systems. Mark Mauss and Wayne Wnuck

Heavy Duty Dual-Fuel Engines

Zorik Pirveysian, Air Quality Policy and Management Division Manager Policy and Planning Department

Testing of the Toyota Avensis DPNR at U.S. EPA-NVFEL SAE TECHNICAL PAPER SERIES

Recent Development of On- Board Vehicle Emissions Measurements in Hong Kong

Fleet Options. Information and Comparison

Natural Gas in High Horsepower Engine Applications

Fleet Characterization Combat Element Logistics Head Significant logistics support is required to transport fuel and supplies to the combat elements a

Global Emission Solution. Cool Particulate Regeneration (CPR )

m b e E M I S S I O N S E N G I N E

The Impact of Oil Consumption Mechanisms on Diesel Exhaust Particle Size Distributions and Detailed Exhaust Chemical Composition

MAN Buses & Coaches Comparing drivetrain technologies. Robert Staimer, NGVA Brussels, July 09th, 2014

Tier 3 Final Rule. Toyota Motor North America Product Regulatory Affairs Susan Collet April 2016

Criteria for Casella AFV Initiative Business case positive. Pay for itself. Does it meet Casella sustainability profile? Improved emissions.

Fuel Economy & Emission Reduction Study

Retrofit Crankcase Ventilation for Diesel Engines

Leveraging Strategies: Japan s Story

Solid Particle Emissions of HDV Euro 3 DPF Euro 4 PM-Kat Euro 5 SCR

M.J. Bradley & Associates LLC How Much will New Technologies Contribute to Better Air Quality?

Foothill Transit Battery Electric Bus Performance Results

draft agenda 20 Nov PM Euro 5 study EC+JRC - ACEM

Diesel Emission Control Technologies: New and In-use Engines

Transcription:

New York City Transit Department of Buses Comparison of Clean Diesel Buses to CNG Buses DEER Conference 23 Newport, RI August 26, 23

Outline Background Regulated Emissions Unregulated Emissions Toxicity Particle Size Economic Analysis Cost Factors Capital Costs Operating Cost NPV of Life Cycle Costs Issues For Future Comparison of Clean Diesel Buses to CNG Buses DEER 23

Technologies Compared Baseline Diesel Model years 1998 21 Diesel Oxidation catalyst (DOC) installed Standard on-road diesel fuel (typical 35 PPM sulfur) NOT including EGR or other post 1-2 technologies Natural Gas Buses Model years 1998 21 Mostly CNG; a few LNG No oxidation catalyst installed Clean Diesel Model years 1998 21 Ultra low sulfur Diesel fuel (<3 PPM sulfur) Diesel Particulate Filter (DPF) installed NOT including EGR or other post 1-2 technologies Comparison of Clean Diesel Buses to CNG Buses DEER 23

Data Sources Emissions NY Clean Diesel Demonstration Program California EC-Diesel Technology Validation Program Miscellaneous published sources (WVU, CARB) Economic Analysis NYCT data from operating CNG buses since 1995 and Clean Diesel Buses since 21 Published information on CNG costs from LACMTA, GCRTA, and Coast Mountain Bus Comparison of Clean Diesel Buses to CNG Buses DEER 23

Effect of Clean Diesel on Regulated Emissions (CBD Cycle).7 PM THC NOx CO.4 42 12.6.35 36 1 Mass Emissions (g/mile).5.4.3.2.3.25.2.15.1 3 24 18 12 8 6 4.1.5 6 2 STD ULSD DPF STD ULSD DPF STD ULSD DPF STD ULSD DPF Comparison of Clean Diesel Buses to CNG Buses DEER 23

Regulated Emissions of Clean Diesel vs CNG (CBD Cycle).5 PM THC NMHC NOx CO 27 6 48 27 Mass Emission (g/mile).4.3.2 24 21 18 15 12 9 5 4 3 2 42 36 3 24 18 24 21 18 15 12 9.1 6 1 12 6 3 6 3 DPF CNG CNG+OC DPF CNG CNG+OC DPF CNG CNG+OC DPF CNG CNG+OC DPF CNG CNG+OC Comparison of Clean Diesel Buses to CNG Buses DEER 23

Regulated Emissions of Clean Diesel vs CNG (NYB Cycle) Mass Emissions (g/mile).16.14.12.1.8.6.4.2 DPF PM CNG 11 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 DPF THC CNG 8 7.5 7 6.5 6 5.5 5 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1.5 NMHC NOx CO 12 72 DPF CNG 11 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 64 56 48 4 32 24 16 8 DPF CNG DPF CNG Comparison of Clean Diesel Buses to CNG Buses DEER 23

Unregulated Emissions of Clean Diesel vs CNG Data from New York Clean Diesel Demonstration Program, CBD Cycle 5 Benzene (mg/mi) Carbonyl (gm/mi) PAH (ug/mi) NO2PAH (ug/mi) 15 1.8 Mass Emissions 4 3 2 1 1.2 1.8.6.4.2 9 75 6 45 3 15 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.8.6.4.2 STD ULSD DPF CNG STD ULSD DPF CNG STD ULSD DPF CNG ULSD DPF CNG Comparison of Clean Diesel Buses to CNG Buses DEER 23

Unregulated Emissions of Clean Diesel vs CNG Data from California EC Diesel Technology Validation Program, CBD Cycle 5 Benzene (mg/mi) Carbonyl (gm/mi) PAH (gm/mi) NO2PAH (ug/mi).2 8 1.2 72 Mass Emissions 4 3 2 1.8.6.4.1.1 64 56 48 4 32 24 1.2 16 8 STD ULSD DPF CNG STD ULSD DPF CNG STD ULSD DPF CNG STD ULSD DPF CNG Comparison of Clean Diesel Buses to CNG Buses DEER 23

PM Particle Count by Size Number Concentration, dn/dlogdp (#/cc) 1.E+8 1.E+7 1.E+6 1.E+5 1.E+4 Avg DPF (619, 665) Avg CNG (854, 975) without backfires CNG (824) with backfires CNG (824) backfires removed 1.E+3 3 6 11 18 27 42 68 11 167 26 42 68 Size (nm) Comparison of Clean Diesel Buses to CNG Buses DEER 23

Emissions Summary CNG Better than Clean Diesel Clean Diesel Better than CNG CNG & Clean Diesel Equal NOx THC NMHC CO Benzene Carbonyl PAH PM mass PM particle number and size NO2PAH Comparison of Clean Diesel Buses to CNG Buses DEER 23

CNG Cost Factors Compared to STANDARD diesel buses, CNG buses cost more for: Capital Bus purchase - Engines, CNG tanks & piping Fuel station installation - High pressure compressors Depot safety modifications - Increased ventilation - Methane detection - remove/mitigate emission sources Operating NG fuel (+ $.11/mile) - Cost of compression - Lower fuel economy Bus maintenance (+ $.2/mile) - Engine, fuel system - Lower reliability Fuel station maintenance - Heavy duty engines & compressors Comparison of Clean Diesel Buses to CNG Buses DEER 23

Clean Diesel Cost Factors Compared to STD diesel buses, Clean Diesel buses cost more for: Capital DPF purchase & installation - Including spares for cleaning Diesel fuel station installation - Included only for apples to apples comparison no actual investment required to switch from standard diesel to ULSD Operating ULSD fuel (+ $.4/mile) - Mostly based on increased logistics cost for noncommercial fuel Annual Cleaning Cleaning/replacement of plugged units - Result of engine upset conditions (5-7.5%/year) Comparison of Clean Diesel Buses to CNG Buses DEER 23

Capital Cost Comparison Incremental costs compared to standard diesel for purchasing 2 buses and outfitting one depot CNG Clean Diesel Cost Element Per Bus Total Per Bus Total Incremental Bus Cost $3, $6 million CNG Fuel Station NA $5 million Depot Modification NA $2 million DPF (incl spares) $5,9 $1.2 million Diesel Fuel Station NA $.5 million TOTAL $31 million $1.7 million Comparison of Clean Diesel Buses to CNG Buses DEER 23

Operating Cost Comparison Incremental annual costs compared to standard diesel for operating 2 buses at one depot CNG Clean Diesel Cost Element Per Bus Total Per Bus Total Incremental CNG Fuel $2,86 $.6 million CNG Fuel Station Maintenance Incr Bus Maintenance NA $5,2 $.9 million $1. million Incremental ULSD $1,4 $28, Diesel Fuel Station Maintenance DPF replacements Annual DPF Cleaning NA $137 $67 $92, $27,4 $134, TOTAL $2.5 million $461,4 Comparison of Clean Diesel Buses to CNG Buses DEER 23

NPV Life-Cycle Analysis Discount rate 6% Period of analysis 3 years Based on operating 2 buses at one depot location Investments based on life cycle of equipment: Facility & Fuel Station Investment CNG Bus CNG Bus Purchase Purchase DPF DPF DPF DPF Purchase Purchase Purchase Purchase Year 1 Year 15 Year 3 Comparison of Clean Diesel Buses to CNG Buses DEER 23

Life Cycle Cost Comparison Incremental costs compared to standard diesel for operating 2 buses at one depot location Does not include overhaul of CNG and diesel engines at mid-life (assumed equivalent) CNG Clean Diesel NPV of Capital Costs NPV of Operating Costs NPV of TOTAL COSTS $33,653,86 $36,651,891 $7,35,697 $3,448,862 $6,732,158 $1,181,2 Annualized NPV of Total Costs $2,343,523 $339,367 Comparison of Clean Diesel Buses to CNG Buses DEER 23

Summary In comparison to CNG, diesel is inherently more fuel efficient While CNG has historically had an inherent emissions advantage, new technologies applied to diesel have dramatically closed the gap Even with the new technologies (which have added cost), diesel retains a significant cost advantage over CNG Comparison of Clean Diesel Buses to CNG Buses DEER 23

Issues Chassis testing shows CNG NOx is much more variable than diesel NOx implications for real world emissions? Effect of catalyst on CNG emissions more data needed EGR and other technologies certified to reduce diesel NOx post Oct 22 chassis test data required to judge real world effects Effect of 27 EPA NOx regulations will NG retain any inherent NOx advantage? - Will diesel retain current cost advantage? Measurement of unregulated toxic emissions standards required for collection and analysis Comparison of Clean Diesel Buses to CNG Buses DEER 23