Application of EMME3 and Transportation Tomorrow Survey (TTS) for Estimation of Zonal Time Varying Population Density Distribution in

Similar documents
HALTON REGION SUB-MODEL

[Report Title] [Report Tag Line]

GTA A.M. PEAK MODEL. Documentation & Users' Guide. Version 4.0. Prepared by. Peter Dalton

Economy. 38% of GDP in 1970; 33% of GDP in 1998 Most significant decline in Manufacturing 47% to 29%

Mississauga Moves: A City in Transformation icity Symposium Hamish Campbell

APPENDIX 6: Transportation Modelling Considerations City of Toronto, February 2014

Yonge-Eglinton. Mobility Hub Profile. September 19, 2012 YONGE- EGLINTON

Mobile Area Transportation Study Urban Area and Planning Boundary

Travel Demand Modeling at NCTCOG

Transit Vehicle (Trolley) Technology Review

Appendix D. Brampton 2006 P.M. Peak Model Report

Autonomous taxicabs in Berlin a spatiotemporal analysis of service performance. Joschka Bischoff, M.Sc. Dr.-Ing. Michal Maciejewski

Mr. Vince Mauceri General Manager Transportation Operations and Technology

CITY OF EDMONTON COMMERCIAL VEHICLE MODEL UPDATE USING A ROADSIDE TRUCK SURVEY

The City of Toronto s Transportation Strategy July 2007

Public Transportation Problems and Solutions in the Historical Center of Quito

AIR QUALITY DETERIORATION IN TEHRAN DUE TO MOTORCYCLES

Three ULTra Case Studies examples of the performance of the system in three different environments

METHODOLOGIES FOR CALCULATING ROAD TRAFFIC EMISSIONS IN MILAN

Portland Area Mainline Needs Assessment DRAFT. Alternative 4 Public Transportation: New or Improved Interstate Bus Service

Back ground Founded in 1887, and has expanded rapidly Altitude about 2500 meters above MSL Now among the ten largest cities in Sub Saharan Africa

Connecting vehicles to grid. Toshiyuki Yamamoto Nagoya University

Air Quality Impacts of Advance Transit s Fixed Route Bus Service

Impact of Delhi s CNG Program on Air Quality

GO Transit s deliverable: the 2020 Service Plan

Chapter 4. Design and Analysis of Feeder-Line Bus. October 2016

OPERATIONAL CHALLENGES OF ELECTROMOBILITY

Smart Green Transportation of LG CNS. Seoul Case

WLTP DHC subgroup. Draft methodology to develop WLTP drive cycle

CAPTURING THE SENSITIVITY OF TRANSIT BUS EMISSIONS TO CONGESTION, GRADE, PASSENGER LOADING, AND FUELS

Seoul. (Area=605, 10mill. 23.5%) Capital Region (Area=11,730, 25mill. 49.4%)

Trip Generation Study: Provo Assisted Living Facility Land Use Code: 254

LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF A DIESEL AND A COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS MEDIUM-DUTY TRUCK. THE CASE OF TORONTO

Road Map for Sustainable Transport Strategy for Colombo Metropolitan Region with Cleaner Air, through Experience

DEVELOPMENT OF RIDERSHIP FORECASTS FOR THE SAN BERNARDINO INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT STUDY

DETERMINING THE ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS OF ADAPTIVE SIGNAL CONTROL SYSTEMS USING SIMULATION MODELS

Mississauga Bus Rapid Transit Preliminary Design Project

Evaluating opportunities for soot-free, low-carbon bus fleets in Brazil: São Paulo case study

Transport systems integration into urban development planning processes

TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTS

Submission to Greater Cambridge City Deal

Urban Land Use/Transport Policy, Metro and Its Impacts in Shanghai

TEXAS CITY PARK & RIDE RIDERSHIP ANALYSIS

Spatial and Temporal Analysis of Real-World Empirical Fuel Use and Emissions

24-25 May, 2018, Skiathos Island, Greece. DAStU, Politecnico di Milano, Via Bonardi 3, 20133, Milano, Italy

2.1 Outline of Person Trip Survey

Shared Transport experience from the UK

Finding Ways out of Congestion for the Chicago Loop. - - A Micro-simulation Approach

Deriving Background Concentrations of NOx and NO 2 April 2016 Update

Structure. Transport and Sustainability. Lessons from Past. The Way Forward

New Zealand Transport Outlook. VKT/Vehicle Numbers Model. November 2017

Stakeholders Advisory Working Groups (SAWGs) Traffic and Transit SAWG Meeting #7

An Innovative Approach

Decarbonization of the Transport Sector and Urban Form

Authors: Ernesto Cipriani, Livia Mannini Barbara Montemarani, Marialisa Nigro, Marco Petrelli.

CLRP. Performance Analysis of The Draft 2014 CLRP. Long-Range Transportation Plan For the National Capital Region

Parks and Transportation System Development Charge Methodology

CONNECTING THE REGION

Appendix F Model Development Report

Effect of driving patterns on fuel-economy for diesel and hybrid electric city buses

Emission Factor Toolkit (EFTv5.2c) User Guide January 2013

US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017

2030 Multimodal Transportation Study

AECOM 30 Leek Cres., 4 th Floor Richmond Hill, ON L4B 4N4 Canada

EVALUATING THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF BATTERY OPERATED AUTO RICKSHAW IN KHULNA CITY

CITY OF VANCOUVER ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT

Smart community clustering for sharing local green energy. Yoshiki Yamagata, Hajime Seya and Sho Kuroda

Outline. Research Questions. Electric Scooters in Viet Nam and India: Factors Influencing (lack of) Adoption and Environmental Implications 11/4/2009

residents of data near walking. related to bicycling and Safety According available. available. 2.2 Land adopted by

UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018

Pollution from ships in Copenhagen Port and the effect on city air quality

Supplement of Model simulations of cooking organic aerosol (COA) over the UK using estimates of emissions based on measurements at two sites in London

Speaker Information Tweet about this presentation #TransitGIS

BUS STOP DESIGN & PLANNING GUIDE

Key Outcomes. The key outcomes of the preliminary study:

Written Exam Public Transport + Answers

Eurocities 25 th April Chris Verweijen, Movares. Bridging the gap! Roadmap to a sustainable city

ACT Canada Sustainable Mobility Summit Planning Innovations in Practice Session 6B Tuesday November 23, 2010

Wellington Transport Strategy Model. TN19.1 Time Period Factors Report Final

Utilizing GIS Models in Prioritizing and Selecting Transportation Projects

Level of Service Analysis for Urban Public Transportation of Dumlupinar University Evliya Celebi Campus in Kutahya, Turkey

Technological Innovation, Environmentally Sustainable Transport, Travel Demand, Scenario Analysis, CO 2

Appendix B: Travel Demand Forecasts July 2017

More persons in the cars? Status and potential for change in car occupancy rates in Norway

Traffic Micro-Simulation Assisted Tunnel Ventilation System Design

APPLICATION OF A PARCEL-BASED SUSTAINABILITY TOOL TO ANALYZE GHG EMISSIONS

IMAGE PROCESSING ANALYSIS OF MOTORCYCLE ORIENTED MIXED TRAFFIC FLOW IN VIETNAM

Real-time Bus Tracking using CrowdSourcing

Findings from the Limassol SUMP study

ONE YEAR ON: THE IMPACTS OF THE LONDON CONGESTION CHARGING SCHEME ON VEHICLE EMISSIONS

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Output

Emission Factor of Carbon Dioxide from In-Use Vehicles in Thailand

Performance Measure Summary - Large Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Medium Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Modelling LEZ and Demand Management measures in the City of York using Detailed Traffic-Emission Tools

Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Traffic Signal Volume Warrants A Delay Perspective

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Volume 5, No 2, 2014

Can Public Transportation Compete with Automated and Connected Cars?

Use of National Household Travel Survey (NHTS) Data in Assessment of Impacts of PHEVs on Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions and Electricity Demand

Transcription:

Application of EMME3 and Transportation Tomorrow Survey (TTS) for Estimation of Zonal Time Varying Population Density Distribution in the Greater Toronto Area Prepared by: Matthew Roorda, Associate Professor University of Toronto Aarshabh Misra, MASc Candidate University of Toronto Prepared for: Data Management Group University of Toronto Joint Program in Transportation September 2011

Acknowledgements Production of this report has been made possible through the financial contributions from Toronto Atmospheric Fund and the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario. Data and access to EMME3 for this project has been provided by the Data Management Group. 2

Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 4 2. Population Exposure Assessment... 4 3. Methodology... 4 3.1 Estimating travel time matrices... 4 3.2 Determining trip arrival times... 5 3.3 Determining population distribution by time of day... 6 4. Results... 6 5. Conclusion... 9 6. References... 10 List of Figures Figure 1: Methodology Flowchart Figure 2: The Greater Toronto Area Network on EMME3 Environment Figure 3: GTA Zonal Population Density Distribution 4:30 AM Figure 4: GTA Zonal Population Density Distribution 10:30 AM Figure 5: GTA Zonal Population Density Distribution 4:30 PM Figure 6: GTA Zonal Population Density Distribution 10:30 PM 3

1. Introduction This report has been prepared as part of an on going project with the Toronto Atmospheric Fund on developing a truck emissions simulation tool for evaluating green commercial vehicle policy [1]. An integrated modelling system has been developed that includes regional travel demand models for the Greater Toronto and Hamilton area (GTHA), a microscopic traffic simulation model of the Toronto waterfront area, a model of vehicle emissions that is sensitive to vehicle driving cycles and a model of pollutant dispersion. The final phase of this project involves an estimation of population location by time of day for the assessment of personal exposure to vehicle generated emissions. By comparing pollutant concentrations and population density in a zone, aggregate population exposure observations can be made. A zone based time varying population density distribution is developed for this purpose. The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow Survey (TTS) micro trip data, Data Management Group Internet Data Retrieval System (IDRS) and EMME3, the travel demand forecasting software were extensively for this purpose. Access to all data, including EMME3 Greater Toronto Area (GTA) road network and the EMME3 network license was provided by the Data Management Group. 2. Population Exposure Assessment The vehicle emission model and the emission dispersion model of the truck emissions simulation tool respectively generates and disperses vehicular emissions, namely carbon mono oxide (CO), carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), nitrogen oxides (NO x ) and hydrocarbons (HC) on the Toronto downtown waterfront network. To analyse and compare the exposure of emissions to the population, a zone based time varying population density distribution is required for the waterfront network. The 2006 Transportation Tomorrow Survey (TTS) is used to process and estimate this distribution. TTS is a household travel survey that has been undertaken every 5 years in the Toronto region since 1986 [2] [3]. Approximately 5% of the population in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) is surveyed telephonically where household characteristics, individual characteristics and trip characteristics for the past 24 hours are collected. The 2001 GTA zone system was used to conduct the population exposure assessment. Section 3 describes the methodology in detail. 3. Methodology The methodology is divided into three sub sections. Figure 1 shows a flowchart that outlines the processes involved. 3.1 Estimating travel time matrices a) Estimating auto travel time matrix using EMME3 b) Transit travel time matrix c) Estimating walking and biking travel time matrices For estimating the auto travel time matrix in EMME3 the GTA road network was loaded with hourly trip matrices from the 2006 TTS data (generated using the DMG IDRS)[4]. The auto assignment was a fixed demand traffic assignment conducted for every hour of the day on a single class of vehicles (auto mode) with a stopping criterion for best relative gap of 0.5% or 20 iterations. The transit travel time matrix was 4

made available by Prof. Eric Miller, Cities Centre, University of Toronto. Figure 2 showss a snapshot of the GTA road network on EMME3. Figure 1: Methodology Flowchart For inter zonazone centroids (calculated using the UTM coordinate system) were multiplied by a factor of 1.4 to walking and biking trips, a Manhattan grid network was assumed and distances between calculate average trip distances; a walking speed of 5 km/h and a biking speed of 20 km/h was assumed to calculate travel times for such trips. For intra zonal auto speed of 40 km/h, was assumed. transitt trips, an average bus speed of 30 km/ /h and for intra zonal auto trips, an average Figure 2: The Greater Toronto Area Road Network on EMME3 Environment 3.2 Determining trip arrival times The TTS Survey only provides a start time for all surveyed daily trips. The end time of all trips is required to calculate the location of people making trips for different times during the day. The travel time matrices generated for the different modes in the first stepp were integrated with the TTS trip data to obtain end times for all surveyed trips. It was assumed that the auto travel times are representative of 5

travel times experienced by modes such as motorcycles, taxis, school buses and all other miscellaneous modes as well. 3.3 Determining population distribution by time of day A MS Access query framework was developed to estimate each person s location for each hour of the day in the GTA. A variable called Snaptime was introduced indicating the time for which the population distribution is estimated. People were categorised on the basis of the number of trips they made between zonal origin destination pairs. The assumed location at the Snaptime, was determined as follows: 1) People making no daily trips: 1.1) People who do not make any trip are located at their home zone. 2) People making only 1 daily trip: 2.1) People are at their origin zone if the trip has not started before Snaptime 2.2) People are at their destination zone if the trip is completed before Snaptime 2.3) People are at the destination zone of the trip in progress, for trips occurring during Snaptime (assumed) 3) People making more than 1 daily trip: 3.1) People are at the destination zone of the last trip completed before Snaptime 3.2) People are at the origin zone of their first trip, if the trip starts after Snaptime 3.3) People are at the destination zone of the trip in progress, for trips occurring during Snaptime (assumed) The query framework was run for each of the 24 hours of the day starting at 4:30 AM. The population density (expressed in capital/sq. km) was plotted against time for different zones in the GTA. Section 4 discusses the results. 4. Results The observed population density distributions are shown in Figures 3 6 [5]. The total population of the GTA based on 2006 TTS survey is approximately 5.87 million. Figure 3 shows the population density distribution (in capita/sq. km) in the GTA at 4:30 AM. Higher densities are observed in downtown Toronto and the suburban city centres of Hamilton, Mississauga and Brampton. This can be attributed to the presence of numerous residential high rise buildings in such areas. Generally higher densities are also observed in the suburban regions, since almost all people are home at 4:30 AM. Figure 4 shows the density distribution at 10:30 AM when most people have travelled to their workplace. As expected, this causes a big spike in the population density at the Central Business District in Toronto, Mississauga & Hamilton and the downtown Whitby Oshawa area. The reverse phenomenon is observed in the evening (Figures 5 and 6) when people travel back to their home, and the population density decreases in the downtown areas for all cities, approximately to their original state from the observations made at 4:30 AM (Figure 3). 6

Figure 3: GTA Zonal Population Density Distribution 4:30 AM Figure 4: GTA Zonal Population Density Distribution 10:30 AM 7

Figure 5: GTA Zonal Population Density Distribution 4:30 PM Figure 6: GTA Zonal Population Density Distribution 10:30 PM 8

5. Conclusion A travel demand model (EMME3) was used to estimate daily travel times for different origin destination zone pairs and integrated with the 2006 Transportation Tomorrow Survey data to generate a population density distribution with hourly variations for the Greater Toronto Area. These time varying zonal population density estimates can now be compared with emission concentration values obtained using the truck emissions simulation tool to estimate population exposure as part of the Toronto Atmospheric Fund project. Notes: 1) Approximately 12000 auto travel trips (1.9% of all daily trips) on the TTS did not have corresponding O D zone combinations available in the EMME3 Auto Travel Time Matrices, likely due to presence of external zones an average travel time of 35 minutes was assumed for all such trips. 2) Approximately 20000 transit travel trips (3.1% of all daily trips) on the TTS that did not have a corresponding O D zone combination available in the EMME Transit Travel Time Matrices. The auto travel times for the 8am 9am period were assumed to be a reasonable approximation for such trips (includes IVTT, WaitT and WalkT) since transit is competitive with auto travel in the rush hour period. 3) For 213 trips, where zone combinations from the auto travel time matrices were not available, an average travel time of 35 minutes was assumed. 4) The sum of the daily population distribution varies by a maximum of 0.0097% for some Snaptime cases. 9

6. References 1. Roorda. M., Amirjamshidi G., Chingcuanco F., A Truck Emissions Simulation Tool for Evaluating Green Commercial Vehicle Policy, Report 1, Literature Review and Development of Simulation, Emissions, and Dispersion Models, Dec. 2010. 2. Transportation Tomorrow Survey, Data Management Group (DMG). Retrieved from: http://www.dmg.utoronto.ca/transportationtomorrowsurvey/index.html 3. Transportation Tomorrow Survey 2006, Version 1, Data Guide, DMG. Retrieved from: http://www.dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/tts/2006/dataguide2006_v1.pdf 4. Greater Toronto Area (GTA) Network Coding Standard, Sep. 2004, DMG. Retrieved from: http://www.dmg.utoronto.ca/pdf/reports/2001to2005/2001_network_coding_std.pdf 5. ESRI Shape file 2001 Zone Boundary Greater Toronto Area (GTA). Retrieved from: http://www.dmg.utoronto.ca/spatial/boundary.html#tts 10