Mississauga Bus Rapid Transit Preliminary Design Project

Similar documents
GTA West Corridor Planning and EA Study Stage 1

EGLINTON CROSSTOWN LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT (LRT)

Mississauga Transit 2009 Budget

Appendix J. Noise Impact Assessment Report

Attachment 5 Eglinton West LRT Planning and Technical Update

EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT

We Want Your Input! Review the design alternatives and tell us what s important to you in the design of these areas of the approved BRT Network:

CITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6

Broward County Intermodal Center And People Mover. AASHTO Value Engineering Conference Presentation. September 1, 2009 San Diego, CA

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Scarborough Transit Planning

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

CREATING CONNECTIONS IN THE TOWN OF NEWMARKET

BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT) MISSISSAUGA SEGMENT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

METRO Orange Line BRT American Boulevard Station Options

Green Line LRT: Beltline Segment Update April 19, 2017

CONNECTING THE REGION

TRANSFORMING THE WAY OUR REGION MOVES

Recommended Vision for the Downtown Rapid Transit Network

Downtown Transit Connector. Making Transit Work for Rhode Island

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MAY 5, 2016

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study

CEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update

GO Transit s deliverable: the 2020 Service Plan

The City of Toronto s Transportation Strategy July 2007

Ottawa LRT Stage 2. McKellar Park Information Session

Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study

WOLVERINE TO BHP JANSEN NEW TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT FALL 2017

US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017

Form Revised: February 2005 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO. MEETING DATE: August 30, SUBJECT: Scarborough Rt Strategic Plan

5 RAPID TRANSIT NETWORK PLAN PRINCIPLES, METROLINX BUSINESS CASE, AND ALTERNATIVE FINANCE AND PROCUREMENT ANALYSIS UPDATE

PROJECT BACKGROUND 3

Snelling Bus Rapid Transit. May 13, 2013 Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #1

5 VAUGHAN METROPOLITAN CENTRE AND SURROUNDING AREAS TRANSPORTATION STUDY PROGRESS

Confederation Line West Alignment Improvement. September 21, 2016

FLAMBOROUGH QUARRY HAUL ROUTE STUDY HAUL ROUTE VIBRATION REPORT. itrans Consulting Inc 100 York Boulevard Richmond Hill, Ontario L4B 1J8

State Avenue Corridor Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)

CTfastrak Expansion. Stakeholder Meeting #4 Manchester Town Hall June 3, 2016

2.1 TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION. Expand regional rapid transit networks STRATEGIC DIRECTION

Report Addendum. Terry Keller, SDDOT. Noise Study Technical Report I-29 from Tea Interchange to Skunk Creek Sioux Falls, South Dakota

Letter EL652 City of Mercer Island. Page 1. No comments n/a

V03. APTA Multimodal Operations Planning Workshop August Green Line LRT

North Shore Alternatives Analysis. May 2012

Mercer Island Center for the Arts Parking Management Plan

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

SOUTHERN GATEWAY. Transportation and Trinity River Project Committee 11 May 2015

2.4 TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION. Support the revitalization of urban cores STRATEGIC DIRECTION

CREATING CONNECTIONS IN EAST GWILLIMBURY

West Broadway Transit Study. Minnesota APA Conference Charles Carlson, Metro Transit Adele Hall, SRF Consulting September 24, 2015

Developing Toronto s Transit Network Plan to Public Information Meeting June 21, 2016

TRANSPORTATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Rapid Transit

Bayshore Station to Moodie Drive LRT Extension Environmental Assessment Studies. Public Meeting 22 March 2017

West Broadway Reconstruction/LRT Design. March 19, 2015

West Broadway Transit Study. Community Advisory Committee September 17, 2015

4.0 TIER 2 ALTERNATIVES

TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTS

Journey to Excellence. Building Markham s Future Together. Development Services Committee. Transit. Update. June 23, 2015

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Proposed Parking Strategy for Existing New Urbanism Areas. Committee of the Whole (Working Session) December 3, 2013

Yonge Subway Extension Breakfast Meeting

New McNicoll Bus Garage Public Open House

CREATING CONNECTIONS IN RICHMOND HILL

RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL INFORMATION ACT 1982

FINAL. Sound Transit Long-Range Plan Update. Issue Paper S.1: Tacoma Link Integration with Central Link. Prepared for: Sound Transit

EGLINTON CROSSTOWN LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT (LRT) PLEASE SIGN IN

Green Line LRT: Beltline Recommendation Frequently Asked Questions

Preliminary Definition of Alternatives. 3.0 Preliminary Definition of Alternatives

CITY OF ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 301 E. Huron St., P.O. Box 8647 Ann Arbor, Michigan

I-26 Fixed Guideway Alternatives Analysis

Newmarket GO Station Mobility Hub Study. Open House #1 MAY 18, 2017

Unified Corridor Investment Study DRAFT Step 2 Scenario Analysis Report

STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Report

US 81 Bypass of Chickasha Environmental Assessment Public Meeting

THE WAY WE MOVE LRT FOR EVERYONE

Central City Line Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) Amendment Public Hearing. July 24, 2014

The Engineering Department recommends Council receive this report for information.

TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury

Submission to Greater Cambridge City Deal

Needs and Community Characteristics

Public Information Workshop

Welcome. Green Line in Your Community

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County Lee Gibson, Executive Director Roger Hanson, Senior Planner

West Hills Shopping Centre Lowe s Expansion Traffic Impact Study

WELCOME TO OUR PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE Eglinton Crosstown Light Rail Transit (LRT)

CREATING CONNECTIONS IN AURORA

Dulles Corridor Air Rights Study Investigation

Scope of Services January 26, Project Development and Conceptual Engineering for City of Lake Forest Amtrak Station

Stakeholders Advisory Working Groups (SAWGs) Traffic and Transit SAWG Meeting #7

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 27, 2014

Confederation Line West Queensway Terrace North. May 27, 2017

OFF-PEAK DELIVERIES. Ontario Trucking Association June 26 th, Goods Movement Office Transportation Policy Branch Ministry of Transportation

O-Train Confederation Line Stage 1

Environmental Assessment Derry Road and Argentia Road Intersection

Public Meeting. City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development

I-10 West AA/EIS Pre-Screening and Tier 1 Analysis Results. Public Meeting. Wulf Grote, Director Project Development Rick Pilgrim, Project Manager

Pacific Electric Right-of-Way / West Santa Ana Branch Corridor Alternatives Analysis

Bi-County Transitway/ Bethesda Station Access Demand Analysis

Location Concept Plan Amendment Recommendation Approved 2011 Concept Plan

Metro Transit Update. Christina Morrison, Senior Planner Metro Transit BRT/Small Starts Project Office. John Dillery, Senior Transit Planner

Transcription:

Mississauga Bus Rapid Transit Preliminary Design Project PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE OCTOBER 2008

WELCOME The Mississauga Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project Thank you for attending this Public Information Centre. We welcome your input on preliminary design issues for this project. Please sign in at our registration table and pick up a comment booklet. The purpose of today s session is to: Provide Mississauga Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) project background and context Describe the current project and explain where we are in the preliminary design process Follow-up on comments received from the PIC held in April 2008 Present the preliminary design of the busway and stations Outline the next steps and how you can be involved

WHAT IS BUS RAPID TRANSIT? Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) is an integrated system for moving people by bus using dedicated road rights-of-way, called busways, for the operation of bus services. To maximize flexibility and reduce the need for transfers, stations are placed at key points along the busway where passengers can connect to other modes of travel (e.g. cycling, local bus, etc).

MISSISSAUGA S BRT The BRT system will improve the quality of life for those living and working in Mississauga. The Mississauga BRT system was originally planned in the early 1990 s to respond to forecast travel demand within and through the City of Mississauga. The Mississauga BRT system is part of a Greater Toronto Areawide GO Transit initiative to create a high-efficiency east-west busway which will span from Oakville to Pickering. Mississauga s portion of this BRT system will cover approximately 18 kilometres The City Centre Transit Terminal and the Highway 403 Bus Bypass Shoulders were built in the 1990 s as part of the BRT program. The BRT plan was updated in 2003 through the EA process to respond to changes in land use and demand forecasts. Mississauga BRT

PROJECT TIMING Inter-Urban Transit Corridor Identified (1978) Mississauga Transitway Planning Study / Provincial EA Approval (1993) Highway 403 HOV Bus By-Pass Shoulders (2003) Provincial EA Addendum (2005) Commitment of Provincial Funding (2006) Commitment of Federal Funding (2007) Preliminary Design (2007-2008) Federal Environmental Assessment (2007-2008) Provincial Environmental Assessment Addendum (2008) Final Design (2008-2011) Construction (2009-2012) Opening Day (2012) Operational

APRIL MEETING FOLLOW-UP Two public meetings for the Mississauga BRT were held in April, 2008. More than 100 people attended the meetings. Many ideas were put forward around four questions: What can be done to maximize Mississauga Transit ridership? What are the strengths and weaknesses of the station design concepts? Station amenities Bus amenities Cycling / Pedestrian features Strengths Weaknesses Suggested improvements Transit service Fare system Additional stations What issues / concerns do you have about the Mississauga BRT system? Station amenities Bus amenities Cycling / pedestrian features Environmental Safety / Security Service / Fares / Connectivity Additional stations Technology Visual appeal Any other suggestions? Various Where possible, the comments and suggestions were incorporated or addressed. Some comments relate to issues beyond the scope of the preliminary design study, and will be addressed by others as appropriate. The detailed comments and the responses by the Project Team are in the printed material below. Additional public information centres were held in June, 2008, as part of the EA Addendum process for five specific sites in the corridor. Approximately 45 residents attended the June drop-in centres. Residents concerns focused on the site-specific changes to the plans, and their comments have been taken into account in finalizing the plan in the affected areas.

TRANSIT SERVICE PLAN A service concept was developed in consultation with Mississauga and GO-Bus Transit Planning staff. The service plan increases the percentage of the population within a 20 minute transit trip of the City Centre from 17% to 32% and the number within 30 minutes of Kipling Station from 5% to 15% The average travel time for all transit trips in Mississauga for AM peak, weekday service is anticipated to decrease by 8.5 minutes with the new infrastructure and service plan. Overall, the result of the investment in infrastructure and additional service will be an increase of Mississauga Transit overall annual ridership from 29 million in 2006 to in the order of 45 million by 2014. CURRENT vs OPENING DAY RIDERSHIP (AM Peak Period) BRT ESTIMATED TRAVEL TIMES

NOISE - GENERAL Noise is a form of energy. Noise is measured in terms of sound pressure, using "Decibels". Noise may be measured on an "A" weighted scale (dba) to best represent the way in which the human ear perceives noise. The decibel scale is not linear; it is logarithmic: 1 dba increase = not normally perceivable 2-3 dba increase = just perceivable 10 dba increase = twice as loud 20 dba increase = four times as loud A doubling of traffic volume typically produces an increase in sound level of about 3 dba. Roadway noise levels generally depend on: Vehicle type (truck, car) Road profile Distance from receiver Type of ground between the road and the receiver Roadway noise, like most noise, varies throughout the day. Therefore, the noise descriptor used in Ontario to assess noise is the equivalent sound level, Leq. Leq is identified as the continuous sound level which has the same energy as a time varying noise level over a specified time period. The Ministry of the Environment (MOE) uses the 16-hour period between 7 AM and 11 PM for the assessment of municipal roadway noise. The noise at any one instant may be higher or lower than the 16 hour average. MOE requires that the predicted future noise level without the proposed road improvement be compared to the future noise level with the proposed road improvement adjacent to a Noise Sensitive Area (NSA). If a future increase in noise of greater than 5 dba is predicted, the MOE/Ministry of Transportation (MTO) Noise Protocol requires that noise mitigation be investigated within the right-of-way. For purposes of assessing noise as part of road expansion project, MTO defines a NSA as a noise sensitive land use with an outdoor living area, which includes: single family houses townhouses multiple unit buildings such as apartments with outdoor living areas for use by all occupants hospitals, nursing homes, with outdoor living areas for the patients. In addition, the Region of Peel, City of Mississauga, City of Brampton Harmonization of Noise Wall Standards and Specifications specifies that an equivalent of 60 dba shall be the criteria for retrofit or local improvement noise walls. Further to this, where road widening occurs and the resulting noise level exceeds 60 dba, the Region will consider the installation of noise barriers (berm/wall/combination) on Regional property where there is residential development with continuous reversed frontage abutting a Regional road (reversed frontage is the rear or side yard length). Noise mitigation measures, if implemented, should be designed to achieve a minimum attenuation of 5 dba or return noise levels to former ambient levels as is technically, economically, and administratively feasible.

NOISE CITY S COMMITMENT In the approved EA, the City committed to monitoring noise levels prior to and following implementation of the busway. As part of the preliminary design study, the City undertook an analysis to: Measure and predict existing ambient sound levels; Determine the potential changes in ambient sound levels imposed by the implementation of the busway; and Identify measures to mitigate and monitor noise effects as warranted (based on the guidelines of the Ministry of the Environment, Region of Peel, and City of Mississauga). Forty three receptor locations were selected to represent the residences within the study area to measure existing sound levels.

NOISE RESULTS The estimated noise levels (Leq(16)) for those NSAs with fronting, reversed or side frontage on the busway corridor were calculated as follows: Existing noise levels 50 dba to 65 dba Future noise levels without Busway 51 dba to 67 dba Future noise levels with Busway widening 52 dba to 67 dba Based on the MOE sound level criteria, all the noise sensitive areas are predicted to have slight or insignificant noise impacts (in the range of 1 to 2 dba) and accordingly, there is no need to consider the application of noise control measures under the Provincial Environment Assessment process for the proposed BRT undertaking. The City, however, will be introducing landscaping and improving berms in selected areas of the busway corridor, which will have a positive influence in mitigating the overall noise experienced by residents in the busway corridor

TYPICAL BELOW-GRADE STATION LANDSCAPING PLAN PLAZA LEVEL AERIAL VIEW OF STATION ENTERING STATION

TYPICAL ABOVE-GRADE STATION AERIAL VIEW OF STATION STATION VIEW FROM STREET STATION VIEW FROM STREET PLATFORM SHELTER

BRT WEST STATION PASSENGER BUILDING BUILDING DETAILS PASSENGER PLATFORM

NEXT STEPS The Project Team will: Consider input from today s session Review the preliminary design concepts in light of comments received Finalize the preliminary design and proceed to the detailed design phase of the study

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Your comments are important Please complete a comment sheet Sign in at the registration table to ensure that you are added to the Project mailing list. If you require further information or wish to provide additional comments, contact the BRT Project Office at: Telephone: 905-615-4636 Fax: 905-615-3218 E-mail: transit.info@mississauga.ca Website: www.mississauga.ca/brt