K::.: ~I ~ I. Agronomy and Soils Departmental Series No. 119

Similar documents
Wilt. Regional. Fusarium. Report. Cotton. -~ I Ib _,C~g~gq~glsble1llM1IM

1997 NATIONAL FUSARIUM WILT COTTON REPORT 1

januarv 1997 Agronomy' and Soils Departmental Series No. 200 Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station James E. Marion, Director Auburn IiniversMr

Performance of Ryegrass Varieties in Alabama, ii/

High Plains Root-Knot Nematode Variety Trial Results, 2016

Performance of Cotton Varieties in 1986

Quality of Cotton Classed by State for the week ending - 1/3/2019 UPLAND

COTTON. Mississippi VARIETY TRIALS, Information Bulletin 372 August Mississippi Agricultural & Forestry Experiment Station

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

Performance of Cotton Varieties

Evaluations of Corn Hybrids in Alabama, 2013

In the Texas High Plains

2016 GEM Midwest Trial Results & New 2017 Releases

Hybrid Performance from Male-Sterile and Pollinator Inbred Onion Lines

1972 Performance of Cotton Varieties

I~I. Horticulture Series No. 631

FLUE CURED TOBACCO VARIETY EVALUATION IN GEORGIA. S. S. LaHue - UGA W. H. Gay - UGA J. M. Moore - UGA

Inheritance of chinch bug resistance in grain pearl millet

, NAS!?r-s~~if.{" WOQi2AN PIGS: FINAt:. EST'IHATES (STATISTICAL,,,", BULLETIN.) NATIONAL ' AGRICULTURAL STATISTICS SERVICE,, ':-'-"'-'-,,

AFNS, 4-10 Agriculture / Forestry Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton AB T6G 2P5

Section 5: Wheat Scab Research

In the Texas High Plains

JOB LOSSES BY STATE, State Industry US total AK AL AR AZ CA CO CT Agriculture, forestry, fisheries -15, ,

Evaluating the impact of feedstock quality on delivered cost: Two case studies from the US Southeast region

2018 Flue-Cured Tobacco Production Guide Disease Resistance Tables Table 4. Flue cured tobacco variety reactions to Black Shank.

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results

SORGHUM FOR SILAGE. Tifton, Georgia: Evaluation of Sorghum Hybrids for Silage, 2016, Nonirrigated Company or Brand Name

2016 Processing Tomato Guide

Field Calibration of Woodruff, Mehlich and Sikora Buffer Tests for Determining Lime Requirement for Missouri soils

PEANUT. Average LSD at 10% Level CV %

2013 Evaluation of In-Furrow and Foliar Fungicides for Disease Control in Peanut in Jay, Florida 1

Alaska (AK) Passenger vehicles, motorcycles 1959 and newer require a title ATV s, boats and snowmobiles do not require a title

4. Testcrosses of lines from SCROGP3 populations (Tables 11): 5. Testcrosses of lines from AR03056:N0902 (Table 12-14):

RETURN ON INVESTMENT LIQUIFIED NATURAL GAS PIVOTAL LNG TRUCK MARKET LNG TO DIESEL COMPARISON

Southern Illinois University Bicyclopyrone: Tolerance and Efficacy in Horseradish - Site 2 - Low Weed Pressure.

Miscellaneous, Including Horseradish and Wheat

We would like to offer our sincere appreciation to the Mississippi Rice Promotion Board for

Oat. Tifton, Georgia: Oat Grain Performance, Data 2-Year Average 3 Rank Yield 1 Wt Ht Lodg.

Week Ending: Oct. 25, 2018

Summary of Dryland Soybean Variety Performance at Four Locations, 2014

(01-ASC-15) Date June 27

The Economic Downturn Lessons on the Correlation between Economic Growth and Energy

Sclerotinia Head Rot and Sunflower Hybrids

Section 5: Wheat Scab Research

11/22/2009 (C18 09) Spray/Seeding Plan Page 1 of 13 University of Georgia. Managing GR Palmer amaranth in LL and RR cotton.

Wheat and Barley Variety Performance Tests in Tennessee

Report of Progress 877

UC Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources Statewide Processing Tomato Variety Evaluation Trials, 2002

Oat. Tifton, Georgia: Oat Grain Performance,

Tifton, Georgia: Dryland Soybean Variety Performance, 2013

AGR APPENDIX. Barley (Hordeum vu/gare L.) Two-row malting. Crop: Type:

Quarterly Hogs and Pigs

1971 Performance of Cotton Varieties

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results

Cotton Cultivar Trials for 2013 Central and South Texas

In the Texas High Plains

Traffic Safety Facts 2002

TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN THE UNIVERSITY OF DUBLIN. Faculty of Engineering, Mathematics and Science. School of Computer Science and Statistics

Tifton, Georgia: Oat Grain Performance, Yield 1

Factors Affecting Highway Safety in Louisiana

2013 Migration Patterns traffic flow by state/province

EVALUATION OF REFLEX AND BICYCLOPYRONE FOR WEED CONTROL IN DIRECT-SEEDED ONION

Traffic Safety Facts 1995

EVALUATION OF CARROT CULTIVARS AND BREEDING SELECTIONS TO IDENTIFY RESISTANCE TO FOLIAR BLIGHTS,

Soybean Breeding Updates Delta Center. Pengyin Chen University of Missouri

Florida MDR 98 Peanut 1

2016 Migration Patterns traffic flow by state/province

Silage Test Results. Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage: Blairsville, Calhoun, Griffin, and Tifton, Georgia, 2014

Variety Trial Results for 2018 and Selection Guide

Performance of 32 Hybrid Rice Varieties at Pine Bluff of Arkansas

Efficacy of Selected Acaricides on Spider Mites in Corn 2010

Selection of States for MANE-VU Regional Haze Consultation (2018)

Trial Report: Supersweet Corn Variety Evaluation Spring 2014

2018 COTTON VARIETY TESTING AND ON-FARM RESULTS

1996 Kentucky Soybean Performance Tests

Phytotoxicity and Efficacy of Sumagic (Uniconazole) for Growth Control of Ornamental Kale (Brassica oleracea Nagoya Mix )

Cotton Cultivar Trials for 2016 Central and South Texas

Triticale. Tifton, Georgia: Triticale Grain Performance, Data 3-Year Average. Head Date bu/acre Wt Ht Lodg.

Regional Feedstock Partnership 2010 Switchgrass Report

Quarterly Hogs and Pigs

FLUE CURED TOBACCO VARIETY EVALUATION IN GEORGIA. S. S. LaHue - UGA J. M. Moore - UGA

EVALUATION OF NITROGEN PRODUCTS APPLIED ON PERENNIAL RYEGRASS DURING THE SPRING SEASON IN RIVERSIDE, CA SUBMITTED BY: SPONSORED BY: AND

Energy Affordability

Cotton Cultivar Trials for 2017 Central and South Texas

PERFORMANCE OF GRAIN SORGHUM HYBRIDS IN ALABAMA 1983

Athens, Georgia: Dryland Later Maturity Cotton Variety Performance, 2016

Wheat Tech Agronomy Wheat Variety Performance Test Results General Information: Growing Season:

Week Ending: Dec. 8, 2016

Wisconsin winter wheat performance tests: 2012

2017 Mississippi Cotton Official Small Plot Variety Trials. --- Preliminary Data ---

Silage Test Results. Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage Blairsville, Calhoun, Griffin, and Tifton, Georgia, 2015

Forecast El Niño Southern Oscillation Phases and Best Irrigation Strategies to Increase Cotton Yield

Cotton Performance Tests in the Texas High Plains and Trans-Pecos Areas of Texas /

Effects of all-offender alcohol ignition interlock laws on recidivism and alcohol-related crashes

Silage Test Results. Summary of Evaluations of Corn Hybrids for Silage Blairsville, Athens, and Tifton, Georgia, 2017

Quarterly Hogs and Pigs

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

Triticale and Rye. Tifton, Georgia: Triticale and Rye Grain Performance,

U.S. PRODUCTION GROWTH

REPORT. Ontario Soybean Variety Trials. Conducted in by the Ontario Oil & Protein Seed Crop Committee

Transcription:

" """ " """ I, I~ ~ :. :'~;~-: ~C~ c~ (. ' ~ -.., ~ ~:I, ~ ~, ~ r - r- ~ r- ~ ~ rrr r r, r ~ ~ ~ r -m~i~-c~ IY -~-... ~:~:0...... I K::.: ~I ~ I boo a 00660 Agronomy and Soils Departmental Series No. 119 :0:9 : :.. ".".. Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station Lowell T. Frobish, Director Auburn University Auburn University, Alabama in cooperation with Crop Science Research Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Mississippi State, Mississippi I~s~-ru PS~;I%; ~ j~il~f;~;lei~;1; -~- -or~-~-~-j ~L~YK3E~;I;rlf; ~r~,,~ ss-~~ru~~ u~jr~~r.r;. ----- ll----r--~------i---l-lr-l--------- --I--------I----- ~\~~~1~~12 ~~~~ ~\~~~~ ~~~~I~~~~~

1987 REGIONAL COTTON FUSARIUM WILT REPORT 1 W. C. Johnson 2 Cotton cultivars and elite breeding lines submitted by 22 cooperators were evaluated for fusarium wilt resistance under field conditions at the. These entries were grown on an Independence loamy fine sand highly infested with both the fusarium wilt fungus (Fusarium oxysporum) Schlect. f. vasinfectum [Atk.] Snyd. & Hans.) and root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.). Plots were 40-inch-wide bedded rows, 30 feet in length, separated by 6-foot alleys. Four replications of the test entries and checks, arranged in a block design, were evaluated. Both susceptible (Rowden) and resistant (McNair 235) cultivars were included as checks. Rowden was planted in row 5 and every tenth row thereafter (15, 25,..., 235) and McNair 235 in row 10 and every tenth row thereafter (20, 30,..., 240) throughout the test. Plots were planted May 12. Missing plots were replanted on June 9. Initial plant counts were made on June 24. Wilted plants were also counted and removed on that date. Later, wilted plants were counted and removed on July 15, July 31, and August 14. The remaining live plants were also counted and recorded on August 14. 1 This report is a joint contribution between USDA-ARS, Crop Science Research Laboratory, Mississippi State, Mississippi, and the Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn University, Alabama. 2 Professor of Agronomy and Soils. -3-

Percent wilted plants per plot was then determined and mean wilting for a given entry calculated. Even with replanting certain plots, poor stands were obtained more frequently than usual. This was especially evident for Rowden. The fusarium wilting percentages for these plots were estimated by the method outlined by Kappelman 3 The incidence of wilt was the highest ever recorded within the experimental area and was not excessively variable, appearing to be more or less randomly distributed. Average wilting of the susceptible Rowden was 87.8, 92.4, 90.6, and 92.2 percent for each of the four replications. The mean incidence of wilting in the resistant check, McNair 235, was 46.7, 49.9, 54.2, and 60.7 percent in the corresponding replications. The long term average for McNair is 12.7 percent wilting. Critical evaluation of a given entry should be made relative to the checks closest to the entry within each replication. Evaluation of breeding progress or evaluation of entries over years should be made only between the relative value of this entry and that of the closest susceptible check rows for each year. Entries submitted by W. C. Johnson are commonly grown cultivars or advanced commercial materials. Thus, these entries are listed by name. Entries submitted by other cooperators are listed by their coded numbers. Additional information regarding the genetic background of a specific coded entry should be obtained from the named cooperator. Kappelman, A. J., 1976. Estimating fusarium wilt reaction of cotton genotypes. Crop Sci. 16: 734-736. -4-

ACKNOWLEDGMENT The author expresses appreciation to A. J. Kappelman, Jr., retired, for advice and technical assistance in conducting the test and preparing this report. Information contained herein is available to all persons without regard to race, color, sex, or national origin. -5-

1987 Regional Cotton Fusarium Wilt Test, Test entry Percent wilt by replication Mean designation 1 2 3 4 Robert R. Bridge, MSU, DES, P.O. Box 197, Stoneville, MS 38776 RRB-1... 18 52 83 84 59 RRB-2... 8 56 82 64 52 RRB-3... 8 94 100 94 96 RRB-4... 43 84 95 98 80 Rowden... 96 100 98 100 98 RRB-5... 52 81 82 85 75 RRB-6... 21 54 86 94 64 RRB-7... 30 62 60 63 54 RRB-8... 28 75 76 44 56 McNair 235..... 17 66 61 81 56 Richard Sheetz, Cargill Seed Div., Box 1630, Plainview, TX 79072 1... 50 52 56 96 64 2... 23 29 57 72 45 3... 74 82 94 91 85 4... 56 87 58 69 68 Rowden... 93 100 100 92 96 5... 85 90 80 45 75 6... 24 69 68 18 45 7... 36 51 62 55 51 8...... 82 63 96 78 80 McNair 235...... 44 48 35 63 48 Lynn McDonald, Stoneville Pedigreed Seed Co., P.O. MS 38776 Box 167 Stoneville, 1... 99 86 87 95 92 2... 95 100 98 99 98 3... 71 87 71 90 80 4... 83 78 19 91 68 Rowden... 80 100 91 96 92 5... 84 89 13 100 72 6.... 65 90 34 90 70 7...... 82 95 15 99 73 8... 70 66 4 72 53 McNair 235... 51 52 13 57 43-6-

1987 Regional Cotton Fusarium Wilt Test, Test entry Pecn itb elcto Mean des ignati on 1 2 3 4 Keith Jones, Delta & Pine Land Co., P.O. Box 157, Scott, MS 38772 1....... 71 51 21 74 54 39 44 8 8 35 2..eeOOegO@ 3... **..... 45 33 6 53 34 4... 84 59 23 45 53 Rowden... 95 97 97 99 97 5......... 63 80 30 74 62 6 *eeo @ @~...e 48 59 17 70 48 7...... 17 46 66 79 52 8.ee.e... e 74 87 76 89 82 M ai 3*0**&0G 9 4*29 55 71 91 62 Mason Hawkins, Ranger Seed Co., Box 1288, Tahoka, TX 79373 RSC-1...so*..5 40 46 37 43 RSC-*2 o..o.. ow *.o.a.0... 0... 80 63 84 54 70 RSCo.3... **. 84 83 75 63 76 RSC-4...,*.. 45 65 31 34 44 Rowden... 84 100 80 50 78 R SCfS o. * s 9.... w,9. is.9.o.73 72 94 80 80 RSC-6 o... &..... 95 100 99 71 91 RSC47...*. 53 70 53 80 64 RSC48...*. 68 74 52 74 67 McNair 2350*000000..0.0...0. 56 38 57 97 62 Laval M. Verhalen, Dept. Agronomy, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078 OKLA,1 *...*.***** 88 30 88 75 70 OKLA-2... *.** 73 38 84 58 63 OKLA-3... *..*wo 11 10 23 14 14 OKL.A4 o... o s* as. f.v.*0*0.s 32 15 35 25 27 Rowden... 94 100 86 72 88 OKLAm5.... s...* s, 32 33 43 10 30 OKA60"4********* 46 23 20 67 39-7-

1987 Regional Cotton Fusarium Wilt Test, Test entry Percent wilt by replication Mean designation 1 2 3 4 W. P. Sappenfield, P.O. Box 160, Portageville, MO 63873 MO-1... 58 11 39 32 35 MO-2... 64 44 83 83 68 MO-3... 68 21 61 37 47 M0-4... 49 18 59 50 44 Rowden... 97 78 98 77 88 MO-5... 48 29 38 48 41 M0-6... 65 39 68 59 58 MO-7... 82 37 52 70 60 MO-8... 31 52 44 51 44 McNair 235... 71 77 73 78 75 P. M. Thaxton, Dept. Plant Path., Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843-2132 PT-I... 94 74 82 99 87 PT-2... 82 74 73 95 81 PT-3... 85 83 91 86 86 PT-4... 35 74 75 96 70 Rowden... 90 99 83 100 93 PT-5... 61 57 60 86 66 PT-6...... 69 73 74 89 76 PT-7... 97 92 93 95 94 PT-8... 99 96 89 76 90 McNair 235... 37 88 50 47 56 Kamal M. El-Zik, Dept. Plant Path., Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77843-2132 KME-1... 88 96 98 92 94 KME-2... 16 82 68 42 52 KME-3... 79 92 96 81 87 KME-4... 59 55 20 16 38 Rowden... 97 97 85 88 92 KME-5... 79 69 73 35 64 KME-6... 62 79 54 16 53 KME-7... 77 30 39 70 54 KME-8... 90 71 89 57 77 McNair 235... 43 10 31 74 40-8-

1987 Regional Cotton Fusarium Wilt rest, Test entry desi anati on Fred M. Bourl and, 39762 FB- 1 FB-2 FB-3 FB-4 Rowden FB-,5 FB-6 FB-7 FB-8 McNa ir C...o - ~ LFl 235 eo.... Dept. Agronomy, 0 0 oe0 rercent wi it- DX.rep 11cation 2 4 P.O. 89 11 33 75 88 32 27 70 67 42 Box 5248, Mississippi State, MS 68 48 39 75 87 40 37 79 80 52 55 89 66 93 83 30 45 87 78 14 78 20 96 77 97 45 64 91 98 66 m'ean 72 42 58 80 89 37 43 82 81 44 Henry W. Webb, Coker's Pedigreed Seed Co., Hartsville, SC C11 C-2 C-3 C-4 Rowden C.C C-6 C"07 C-8 McNai r o* 0 o oe&e* 0 &*0*0 e ce0ge c2c..ccceoeeec*@eebc0 28 67 29 62 90 52 76 54 76 60 80 92 63 97 100 36 79 83 78 48 67 58 32 52 100 75 77 44 43 55 29505 63 81 35 66 90 48 87 60 48 92 60 74 40 69 95 53 80 60 61 64 Shelby H. Baker, Georgia Coastal Plain Tifton, GA 31793-0748 Gar-1 GaT.p2 GaT-3 GaT-w4 Rowden Gar-5 GaT-6 GaT..7 GaT4. McNai r *e.e.e.cceeecceecceec.. e..ecc.e...c.ececee ee..ee.ee.eeeccecc.c. *ec.c*eeceecce... ccce.occe.eeccceecccb ecc...ecccc.e.c.e e..c.cecc.eec..ceccoe **b e*bc~bc~cb~ *cceeec cc.eeccececccceceocce 23S.ceeeecceceeccbbeb 34 30 77 86 71 87 67 50 35 45 Exp. Stations,9P0O Box.748, 38 84 81 62 93 82 89 77 75 44 41 54 62 63 88 80 98 82 85 75 87 53 77 100 100 56 55 73 45 48 50 55 74 78 88 76 77 71 53 -"9-

1987 Regional Cotton Fusarium Wilt Test, Test entry Percent wilt by replication Mean designation 1 2 3 4 Joel F. Mahill, GroAgri Seed Co., P.O. Box 1656, Lubbock, TX 79408 1... 69 31 21 43 41 2... 81 68 79 95 81 3... 54 45 41 85 56 4... 41 38 44 58 45 Rowden... 96 95 100 93 96 5... 92 85 99 100 94 6... 99 96 99 99 98 7... 15 17 11 31 18 8....... 59 19 91 67 59 McNair 235... 25 17 42 39 31 Lloyd McCall, Summit Seed Co., P.O. Box 10121, Lubbock, TX 79408 1... 71 78 69 9 57 2... 51 77 82 56 66 3... 77 79 78 43 69 4...... 96 84 93 92 91 Rowden 91 86 92 93 90 5. 90 70 57 77 73 6... 83 74 61 95 78 7... 62 86 73 82 76 8 86 71 92 94 86 McNair 235... 33 57 56 40 46 Gene Douglas, Hollandale Agr. Service, P.O. Box 397, Hollandale, MS 38748 1702... 99 95 100 100 98 1703... 96 99 99 98 98 1708... 97 90 90 96 93 1704... 73 83 84 86 82 Rowden... 65 92 88 100 85 1705... 99 47 100 99 86 1707... 97 100 100 100 99 1701... 98 98 86 92 94 1706 99 100 97 94 98 McNair 235... 39 40 52 74 51-10-

1987 Regional Cotton Fusarium Wilt Test, Test entry Percent wilit by. replication Mean designation 1 2 3 47 Jack E. Jones, Dept. Agronomy, LSU, Baton Rouge, LA.708034,110 001... 16 17 32 73 34 110-3... 41 19 31 24 29 00-4....... 14 11 14 12 13 Rowden..... 93 92 97 98 95 00-5 ****,*****. 14 7 14 12 12 00-ml6 70 50 46 44 52 Jo- *...7. 34 46 42 21 36 008... * 82 82 93 74 83 McNair 235006*** 21 45 21 37 31 Cynthia C. Green, Cotton Production Research Unit, P.O. Box 2131, Florence, SC 29503 58 36 72 45 53 PD55#eoo***o*~o67 14 69 56 52 PD58*~*o*oo**~*74 46 72 93 71 PD58o*o**oooooo61 78 40 75 64 Rowden...... 60 89 60 100 77 Pw55#***&******28 29 31 34 30 PD56#oo~~~~~oe*33 36 50 76 49 PD58*~oooso#*~o66 66 62 79 68 PD56****#***o~960 74 61 77 68 McNair 235...0 44 53 94 20 53 PD57*#g*ooooog*w72 67 76 85 75 P 46389**9*0#**974 42 57 52 56 Rex Dunn, Dunn Seed Co., Rt. 4 Box 437, Seminole, TX 79360 1........ 71 73 66 53 66 2... 59 64 85 62 68 Rowden......... 92 92 96 100 95 3...... 44 97 41 50 46 4 *1 a 9 A 6 n Ai; 45 91;. 5 14-11-0

1987 Regional Cotton Fusarium Wilt Test, Test entry Percent wilt by replication Mean designation 1 2 3 4 James Olvey, Penwalt Corp., 4201 Broadway, Phoenix, AZ 81040 1... 99 98 94 99 98 McNair 235... 55 56 81 57 62 2... 65 58 95 42 65 3... 88 90 92 81 88 4... 95 83 73 74 81 5... 95 93 90 99 94 Rowden... 97 76 100 89 90 6... 75 74 89 92 81 7... 89 85 94 47 79 8... 57 84 83 70 74 Kara A. Pearce, Campbell, West & Associates, P.O. Box 9656, Bakersfield, CA 93389 GC OI601H... 96 69 65 62 73 GC-603H... 87 82 86 81 84 McNair 235... 53 64 73 92 70 R. L. Shepherd, P.O. Box 5367, Mississippi State, MS 39762 81-29... 19 47 19 26 28 83-19... 42 35 40 23 35 83-500... 56 44 35 30 41 83-277... Rowden... 28 94 22 75 21 93 17 100 22 90 Auburn 634... 11 9 15 13 12 83-725... 50 59 23 33 41 81-92... 53 41 45 49 47 83-315... 11 13 12 34 18 McNair 235... 47 46 74 60 57-12-

1987 Regional Cotton Fusarium Wilt Test, Test entry Percent wilt by replcation mean designation12 NNWWNOM34 W9 C. Johnson, Dept. Agronomy and Soils, Auburn University, AL 36849 Coker 315...0 88 66 83 60 74 McNair 235...* 74 49 60 65 62 Coker 139... 88 26 55 73 60 Delcot 311...0 59 16 15 31 30 Tifcot 56... 73 54 60 59 62 Coker 208... 71 66 91 74 76 Rowden... 99 82 96 88 91 Coker 118-6903...0 94 34 81 59 67 Delcot 344... 57 63 49 25 48 Stoneville 825...* 98 98 98 94 97 Deltapine 20... 83 36 91 70 70 McNair 235... 70 45 54 45 54 Deltapine 50... 49 49 75 35 52 Coker 130-,6905... 72 73 71 50 66 GAT 8125...0... 0. 85 59 82 44 68 Deltapine 41...0 69 12 100 53 58 Rowden... 97 96 90 94 94 Arkot 58... 91 29 90 66 69 Coker 81-,6130000*0... 94 40 88 38 65 Stoneville 506009000#00000*0 93 25 79 40 59 KC 380... 75 79 97 33 71 McNair 235.,... 33 50 72 29 46 Terra C3... 95 85 98 29 77 Stoneville 1120*... 81 64 58 87 72 Delcot 390...0 59 61 38 85 61 DES 42200.0.0*..0...0...0... 83 59 55 89 72 Rowden... 69 100 100 98 92 DES 19... 81 45 73 42 60 Stoneville 453... 87 76 91 75 82 SV 93... 46 76 15 73 52 Dunn 1002*0***9*000&*00*&**0 72 76 75 82 76 McNair25... 58 61 34 52 51 PD 3... 57 46 33 36 43 Sisco 77200000090*90000.*... 28 81 46 13 42 McNair 220... 21 26 67 52 42 Terra C-4000*09*00*00... 68 43 72 69 63 Rowden... 81 91 74 100 86 S;V 13-1.-------------------- 71 27 100 )86; 71 -*13-m