Measuring the Smartness of the Electricity Grid

Similar documents
EC Task ForceforSmart Grids: Assessment framework

Presentation of the European Electricity Grid Initiative

DG system integration in distribution networks. The transition from passive to active grids

Microgrids in the EU TP SmartGrids Context

SMART DIGITAL GRIDS: AT THE HEART OF THE ENERGY TRANSITION

Paola Petroni. Enel Infrastructures and Networks Division. Catania, 9 November 2010

Development of Smart Grids in Europe

Highlights of EU efforts for Smart Grids deployment and the way forward

Evaluation and modelling of demand and generation at distribution level for Smart grid implementation

The Old Gray Grid She Ain t What She Used to Be Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

InovCity Évora Beyond metering, towards a smarter grid

Efficiency Challenges for the European Utilities A view from Enel

Karl Elfstadius, ABB Smart Grid Program Mmanager / SMART GRID TAIWAN, Smart Grid Overview. ABB SG_Presentation_V4.

Robustness and Cost Efficiency through User Flexibility in the Distribution Network

A smartness indicator for grids: Increasing transparency on the ability of electrical grids to support the energy transition

ENERGY STORAGE. Integrating Renewables thanks to Consumers Flexibility. Energy Pool Développement SAS

Materials Research for Smart Grid Applications

GEODE Report: Flexibility in Tomorrow s Energy System DSOs approach

GSGF workshop on Energy Storage,

Summer Reliability Assessment Report Electric Distribution Companies Perspective

Enel Group today Evolution and achievements since /31/ GW % additional capacity mn end users +8.4 mn smart meters 3

Low Carbon Green Growth Roadmap for Asia and the Pacific FACT SHEET

Solutions for Smarter Power Markets

Yong Tae (Philip) Yoon Electric Power Network Economics Department of Electrical Engineering Seoul National University

Smart Grids and the Change of the Electric System Paradigm

Impact of Distributed Generation and Storage on Zero Net Energy (ZNE)

ABB Automation World 2012, V. Knazkins, 6 June 2012 Smart Grids and Modern Excitation Systems. ABB Group June 4, 2012 Slide 1

Solar Development in New Jersey, and PV Impacts on the Distribution System Carnegie Mellon Conference on the Electricity Industry - March 9, 2011

Utility Distribution Planning 101

India Smart Grid Week, 2017

BROCHURE. End-to-end microgrid solutions From consulting and advisory services to design and implementation

Smart Grids from the perspective of consumers IEA DSM Workshop

New Business Models for Distribution Network Operators

Smart grids in European Union. Andrej GREBENC European Commission "Energy Awarness Seminar Villach

Scientific Support for The Transition To A Low Carbon Economy - Drivers for Low Carbon Economy

Solar Project Development in Regulated Markets. Smart and Sustainable Campuses Conference 2017

Facilitated Discussion on the Future of the Power Grid

PG&E s Energy Landscape. Gregg Lemler, vice president, electric transmission i-pcgrid Workshop March 28 30, 2018

ENERGY STRATEGY FOR YUKON. Independent Power Production Policy

Pilbara Undergrounding Program Smart Grid Opportunities November 2009 DMS#

The challenges and opportunities of a smart grid for the European TSO

SmartGrids: Overview of Smart Grid Technologies Application Prospects - EU initiatives.

Electric energy storage Elia Group Approach

Smart Grids implementation: and Enel Case Study. Livio Gallo, Chairman E-DSO for Smart Grids CEO Enel Distribuzione

Stuart Michie, Network Management, 9 May 2013 Demystifying the Smart Grid Technology Days. ABB 08 May 2013 Slide 1

PHILIPPINE DISTRIBUTION CODE 2017 EDITION

Smart Grid. Sahar Rahim. Supervisor: Dr. Nadeem Javaid. MS-Electrical Engineering

The Future. 3 rd Industrial Revolution. By Jeremy Rifkin

The California Experience. Ted Craver Chairman, President, and CEO Edison International 2009 Summer Seminar August 4, 2009

Industry View of the Smart Grid

Smart Grid Implementation Strategies. Ray Gogel February 2010

Microgrid solutions Delivering resilient power anywhere at any time

Issue 23 draft for Nuvve

A vision of Smart Grid deployment at ENERGA-OPERATOR SA

USAID Distributed PV Building Blocks

MONTHLY PERFORMANCE DASHBOARD

RI Power Sector Transformation Con Edison Experiences. May 31 st, 2017

The Future of Energy Delivery: The Ongoing Grid Transformation

Towards a sustainable market design

SCE Smart Grid. Creating a Cleaner, Smarter Energy Future. Metering, Billing / MDM America Conference. San Diego. March 9, 2010

Veridian s Perspectives of Distributed Energy Resources

MONTHLY PERFORMANCE DASHBOARD

Non-network solutions

Microgrid opportunities in Finland

Utility Solar Business Models

Building the Business Case for Energy Storage

Ron Schoff Senior Program Manager, EPRI. USEA Energy Supply Forum Washington, DC October 2, 2014

Spreading Innovation for the Power Sector Transformation Globally. Amsterdam, 3 October 2017

Integrating DER. Thomas Bialek, PhD PE Chief Engineer. Smart Grid & Climate Change Summit October 13, 2015

Challenges Facing the City of Cape Town in Meeting Renewable Energy Targets

RES integration into energy system

Consumers, Vehicles and Energy Integration (CVEI) project

Virtual Power Plants Realising the value of distributed storage systems through and aggregation and integration

Spreading Innovation for the Power Sector Transformation Globally. Amsterdam, 3 October 2017

Tomorrow s Energy Grid

Pedro Nunes. July 2016

A Swiss perspective of DSM for electricity networks -Overview of ongoing projects - Dr. Matthias Galus, Dep. Head Networks

Microgrids: Delivering A Smarter, Cleaner And More Resilient Grid Infrastructure

The role of Transmission System Operator in Belgium and in Europe. Vlerick Alumni Event 26 January 2016

MONTHLY PERFORMANCE DASHBOARD

PGE Sustainability Report Key Metrics FISCAL YEAR 2017

GLOBAL ENERGY STORAGE MARKET UPDATE: AUSTRALIAN ENERGY STORAGE ASSOCIATION

Portland General Electric

Florida Public Service Commission Rule Development Workshop

Equipment Strategy for Stand By Diesel Generators Strategy

Plenary Session 2. Regulatory aspects and market operations in smart grid environments

Energy and Mobility Transition in Metropolitan Areas

SMART GRIDS, THE FUTURE OF DISTRIBUTION POWER NETWORK

Demand Response as a Power System Resource

Smart Islands Smart Networks European Forum on Clean Energy for Islands Naxos, 9-11 of July 2018

Electric Transportation and Energy Storage

Standards for Smart Grids Progress and Trends

DER Portfolio Optimization and Dispatch, Tertiary Control/Monitoring Strategies

MONTHLY PERFORMANCE DASHBOARD

Modern Regulatory Frameworks for a Flexible, Resilient, & Connected Grid

San Diego Gas & Electric United States

NAVIGANT RESEARCH INTRODUCTION

A DOUG s View of Electric Utility Industry MICHAEL SHEEHAN, P.E. FAILTE GROUP NOVEMBER 2014

DNV GL Energy Transition Outlook 2018 and our services related to electric mobility

Electricity Trends in Pennsylvania

Transcription:

Measuring the Smartness of the Electricity Grid Leen Vandezande Benjamin Dupont Leonardo Meeus Ronnie Belmans

Overview Introduction Key Performance Indicators (KPIs): what & why? Benchmarking the Smart Grid Conclusions 2

Background: European energy policy Towards a low carbon economy 3 ambitious targets by 2020 Cutting GHG emissions by 20% (compared to 1990 levels) Reducing energy consumption by 20% Reaching a 20% share of energy from RES Min. 80% reduction of GHG emissions targeted by 2050 Reduction of greenhouse gases Energy consumption Efficiency increase -20% -20% Share of renewable energy +20% Smart electricity grid = key aspect to reach goals 8,5% 3

Background: European energy policy Strategic Energy Technology (SET) Plan 6 initiatives Wind energy Solar energy Electricity grid Bio-energy Carbon capture and storage Nuclear energy European Electricity Grid Initiative (EEGI) 9-year RD&D program estimated cost of 2 B Activities organised in 10 clusters & 29 functional projects ERGEG position paper on Smart Grids CEER status review of regulatory approaches to Smart Grids Adequate Regulatory framework 4

Overview Introduction Key Performance Indicators (KPIs): what & why? Key Performance Indicators (KPIs): Why? Benchmarking the Smart Grid Conclusions 5

In general What are KPIs? Purpose: performance measurement Used in business activity monitoring E.g. in construction industry, health industry, for quality regulation in electricity distribution systems, In a Smart Grid context No common view SET-plan: evaluation of progress towards 2020 targets EEGI: evaluation of demo projects ERGEG: evaluation of regulatory incentives No clear framework exists today 6

Why using KPIs? To answer the questions What makes an electricity system smart? How can this smartness be measured? 7

Overview Introduction Key Performance Indicators (KPIs): what & why? Benchmarking the Smart Grid Conclusions 8

Methodology 6 Characteristics Derived from U.S. DoE Smart Grid System Report Adopted by SmartGrids ETP Categories KPIs Bound to SMART-criteria: Specific Measurable Attainable Relevant Time-Bound 9

6 Characteristics Enable informed participation by customers Accommodate all generation & storage options Sell more than kwhs Provide power quality for the 21st century Optimize assets & operate efficiently Operate resiliently to disturbances, attacks & natural disasters 10

Enable informed participation of customers Categories Advanced Meters Dynamic Pricing Signals Smart Appliances Demand Side Management Prosumer 11

KPIs Enable informed participation of customers Enable informed participation by customers Advanced Meters 1A: Number of advanced meters installed 1B: Percentage of total demand served by advanced meters Dynamic Pricing 2A: The fraction of customers served by tariffs Signals 2B: The fraction of load served by tariffs Smart Appliances 3A: Total yearly retail sales volume for purchases of smart appliances [ ] 3B: Total load capacity in each consumer category that is actually or potentially modified by behaviours of smart appliances [MW] Demand Side 4A: Fraction of consumers contributing in DSM [%] Management 4B: Percentage of consumer load capacity participating in DSM [MW/MW] 4C: Potential for time shift (before start-up and during operation) [h] Prosumer 5A: Total electrical energy locally (decentralised) produced versus total electrical energy consumed [MWh/MWh] 5B: Minimal demand from grid (maximal own production) versus maximal demand from the grid (own production is zero) [MW/MW] 5C: Fraction of time prosumer is net producer and consumer [h/h] 12

Accommodate all generation and storage options Categories DG and storage PHEVs DER interconnection 13

KPIs Accommodate all generation and storage options Accommodate all generation and storage options Distributed 6A: Amount of production generated by local, distributed generation (MW/MW) Generation and 6B: Potential for direct electrical energy storage relative to daily demand for electrical Storage energy [MWh el /MWh el ] 6C: Indirect electrical energy storage through the use of heat pumps: time shift allowed for heating/cooling [h] PHEVs 7A: The total number and percentage shares of on-road light-duty vehicles, comprising PHEVs 7B: Percentage of the charging capacity of the vehicles that can be controlled (versus the charging capacity of the vehicles or the total power capacity of the grid) [MW/MW] 7C: Percentage of the stored energy in vehicles that can be controlled (versus the available energy in the vehicles or the total energy consumption in the grid) [MWh/MWh] 7D: Number of charging points that are provided to charge the vehicles DER Interconnection 8A: The percentage of grid operators with standard distributed resource interconnection policies 14

Categories Sell more than kwhs New energy services Customer Choice Interoperability Maturity Level Flexibility Support Mechanisms 15

Sell more than kwhs KPIs Sell more than kwhs New Energy Services Flexibility Customer Choice Support Mechanisms Interoperability Maturity Level 9A: Number of customers served by ESCO s 9B: Number of additional energy services offered to the consumer 9C: Number of kwh that the consumer saves in comparison to the consumption before the energy service 10A: The number of customers offering flexibility to aggregators 10B: The flexibility that aggregators can offer to other market players [MWh] 10C: The time that aggregators can offer a certain flexibility [h] 10D: To what extent are storage and DG able to provide ancillary services as a percentage of the total offered ancillary services 10E: Percentage of storage and DG that can be modified vs. total storage and DG [MW/MW] 11A: Number of tariff plans available to end consumers 12A: The average percentage of smart grid investment that can be recovered through rates or subsidies 12B: The percentage of smart grid investment covered by external financing 13A: The weighted average maturity level of interoperability realised among electricity system stakeholders 06/25/2010 Measuring the "Smartness" of the Electricity Grid 16

Provide power quality for the 21 st century Categories Power Quality Required Power Quality Microgrids 17

KPIs Provide power quality for the 21 st century Provide power quality for the 21st Century Power Quality 14A: Amount of voltage variations in the grid [RMS] 14B: Time of a certain voltage variation [h] 14C: The percentage of customer complaints related to power quality problems (excluding outages) Required Power 15A: Range of frequencies [Hz] contracted and range of voltages [V] contracted Quality Microgrids 16A: The number of microgrids in operation. 16B: The capacity of microgrids [MW] 16C: The total grid capacity of microgrids to the capacity of the entire grid [MW/MW] 18

Optimize assets and operate efficiently Categories T&D Automation Dynamic Line Rating Capacity Factors Efficiencies 19

KPIs Provide power quality for the 21 st century Optimise assets and operate efficiently T&D Automation 17A: Percentage of substations applying automation technologies Dynamic Line Rating 18A: Number of lines operated under dynamic line ratings 18B: Percentage of kilometres of transmission circuits operated under dynamic line ratings [km] 18C: Yearly average transmission transfer capacity expansion due to the use of dynamic (versus fixed) line ratings [MW-km] Capacity Factors 19A: Yearly average and peak generation capacity factor (%) 19B: Yearly average and average peak capacity factor for a typical kilometer of transmission line (%-km per km) 19C: Yearly average and average peak distribution transformer capacity factor (%) Efficiencies 20A: Efficiency of generation facilities [energy output (MWh) / energy input (MWh)] 20B: Energy losses in transmission and distribution [MWh/year] 20

Operate resiliently to disturbances, attacks and natural disasters Categories Advanced sensors T&D Reliability Information Exchange Standards in telecommunication infrastructure 21

KPIs Operate resiliently to disturbances, attacks and natural disasters 22C: Performance (bandwidth, response speed, availability, adaptability, ) of the 23B: SAIFI represents the total number of customer interruptions per customer for a 23D: MAIFI represents the total number of customer interruptions per customer lasting less Operate resiliently to disturbances, attacks and natural disasters Advanced Sensors 21A: Number (or percentage) of grid elements (substations, switches, ) that can be remotely monitored and controlled in real-time 21B: The percentage of substations possessing advanced measurement technology 21C: The number of applications supported by these various measurement technologies Information Exchange 22A: Total SCADA points shared per substation (ratio) 22B: Fraction of transmission-level synchrophasor measurement points shared multilaterally (%) communication channels towards grid elements T&D Reliability 23A: SAIDI represents the average number of minutes customers are interrupted each year [Minutes] particular electric supply system [Interruptions] 23C: CAIDI represents the average outage duration that a customer experiences [Minutes] than five minutes for a particular electric supply system [Interruptions] Standards in telecommunication 24A: The compliance of electric power industries with European and international telecommunication standards and protocols. infrastructure 22

Using the results for policy making Assess progress towards a smart grid on national & European level Benchmarking between countries or with other continents Regulation Sunshine Regulation Incentive regulation Direct regulation Evaluate project results on smart grids Encourage progress in each of the 6 characteristics 23

Overview Introduction Key Performance Indicators (KPIs): what & why? Benchmarking the Smart Grid Conclusions 24

To conclude Differences between initiatives No common understanding of KPIs Measurability sometimes neglected List of KPIs Defined around 6 characteristics Clustered in categories Further Research Starting Point Workshops/Surveys/Studies 25

Further research: Example Definition of KPIs for evaluation of project results within EEGI program Level 1 High level, easy to understand policy indicators related to pillars of EU strategy Level 2 Technical KPIs common to different demo projects Implementation Effectiveness of EEGI Program Level 3 Project specific indicators each demo project will define its own KPIs Source: www.gridplus.eu 26

Further reading Download the full paper at http://www.esat.kuleuven.be/electa/publications/fulltexts /pub_2072.pdf 27