New Haven-Hartford-Springfield Rail Project Gateway to New England. Public Hearing June

Similar documents
2012 MULTIMODAL OPERATIONS WORKSHOP

New Haven-Hartford-Springfield Rail Project Gateway to New England. Program Update March 14, 2011 Revised & Updated March 31, 2011

New Haven Hartford Springfield Rail

NEW HAVEN-HARTFORD-SPRINGFIELD LINE HIGH SPEED INTERCITY RAIL PROJECT

Status of Plans March Presented by CAPITOL REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS

The Preferred Alternative: a Vision for Growth on the Northeast Corridor

The Northeast Corridor Master Plan Amtrak s Next Generation High-Speed Rail and Northeastern Maryland

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study

Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project (PCEP)

An Overview of High Speed Rail. David Randall Peterman Congressional Research Service

STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Report

US 81 Bypass of Chickasha Environmental Assessment Public Meeting

NEW HAVEN HARTFORD SPRINGFIELD RAIL PROGRAM

Leadership NC. November 8, 2018

I-84 Hartford Project Public Advisory Committee Meeting #19. March 28, 2019

SH 249 IN GRIMES COUNTY. Open House April 3, 2014

UNION STATION MASTER PLAN STUDY

West Broadway Reconstruction/LRT Design. March 19, 2015

Chicago Milwaukee Intercity Passenger Rail Corridor

Public Advisory Committee Meeting #3. February 11, 2014

Expanding Capacity for the Northeast Corridor The Gateway Program

US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017

Ohio Passenger Rail Development. Northwest Ohio Passenger Rail Association

Update of the Midwest Regional Rail Initiative. Tim Hoeffner Michigan Department of Transportation Director, Office of Rail Lansing, MI

Public Information Workshop

Restoration of Historic Streetcar Services in Downtown Los Angeles

Broward County Intermodal Center And People Mover. AASHTO Value Engineering Conference Presentation. September 1, 2009 San Diego, CA

Rail alignment and benefits (rab) study

Mountainland Association of Governments SPRINGVILLE-SPANISH FORK AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY APRIL 2012

Chicago to St. Louis High-Speed Rail. IDOT District 8 Crossings. July 29, 2015

Program. presented by: September 22, 2010

AMTRAK ENVISIONS WORLD CLASS HIGH-SPEED RAIL Washington to Boston in about three hours at up to 220 mph (354 kph)

BART Silicon Valley. Berryessa Extension Project Community Update. October 27, 2010

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

Passenger rail service is returning to Greenfield!

CROSSING RAIL PROJECT (P4) RAIL

Community Advisory Committee. October 5, 2015

CTfastrak Expansion. Stakeholder Meeting #4 Manchester Town Hall June 3, 2016

Link LRT: Maintenance Bases, Vehicles and Operations for ST2 Expansion

Downtown Transit Connector. Making Transit Work for Rhode Island

I-405 and SR 522/NE 145th Bus Rapid Transit. Elected Leadership Groups Meeting November 30, 2018

Service Development Plan

Charlotte Gateway Station A State & City Partnership June 24, 2015

We Want Your Input! Review the design alternatives and tell us what s important to you in the design of these areas of the approved BRT Network:

Northeast Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Public Involvement Round 2 Input on Alternatives for Further Study

Transit Access Study

Business Advisory Committee. July 7, 2015

Public Meeting. City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development

TRANSFORMING THE WAY OUR REGION MOVES

Doran Street and Broadway/Brazil Grade Separation Project

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Draft Results and Recommendations

Capital Metro Plans & Projects Update NASWC July 27, capmetro.org

Meeting the Transportation Challenge in the Northeast

Introducing the Solution to LA s Airport Congestion Problem

METRONext. Vision & Moving Forward Plans. Board Workshop. December 11, DRAFT For Preliminary Discussion Only

Needs and Community Characteristics

Harlem Avenue between 63 rd and 65 th

Electric Multiple Unit Procurement Update

Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study

Help shape your community investment in Wake Transit. Fiscal Year 2019 Draft Work Plan Summary

Naval Station Norfolk Transit Extension Study. October 2014

I-10 West AA/EIS Pre-Screening and Tier 1 Analysis Results. Public Meeting. Wulf Grote, Director Project Development Rick Pilgrim, Project Manager

Rail alignment and benefits (rab) study

LEADING GATEWAY FOR U.S.-ASIA TRADE

ITEM 13 - NOTICE May 20, 2009

CITY OF ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 301 E. Huron St., P.O. Box 8647 Ann Arbor, Michigan

King of Prussia Rail Project Frequently Asked Questions - Archive Version: Summer 2016

DART Capital Program Update

Click to edit Master title style

Georgia Department of Transportation 2006 Fact Sheet Lovejoy to Atlanta Rail Line visit the website at

SOUTHERN GATEWAY. Transportation and Trinity River Project Committee 11 May 2015

Develop ground transportation improvements to make the Airport a multi-modal regional

Maryland Gets to Work

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MAY 5, 2016

East San Fernando Valley Transit Corridor. Information Session, October 10, 2017

Transportation Committee Revised Project Scope and Cost Estimate. November 23, 2015

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

Southern California - CHSRA

CREATING CONNECTIONS IN WATERLOO REGION

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Elected Officials Briefing North Metro Rail Line Update. November 10, 2016

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

The Future of Transportation on the Caltrain Corridor

Proposal for September 2006 Start of Commuter Rail from Lovejoy on the Macon Line to Atlanta

Sales and Use Transportation Tax Implementation Plan

Michigan Avenue Corridor Study. Joint Policy / Technical Committee Meeting Wednesday, June 8, 2016

Caltrain Modernization EMU Procurement

Draft Results and Open House

Pomona Rotary December 19, 2017

Challenges in a Post-Katrina Environment East-West Corridor Project Overview February, 2007

CITY OF ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 301 E. Huron St., P.O. Box 8647 Ann Arbor, Michigan

Transportation Demand Management Element

Attachment D Environmental Justice and Outreach

LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (LACMTA) AND FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION (FTA)

Energy Technical Memorandum

METRO Light Rail Update

GO Transit s deliverable: the 2020 Service Plan

Transit Project Delivery Status Report. Significant Issues

Proposed Program of Interrelated Projects

Transcription:

New Haven-Hartford-Springfield Rail Project Gateway to New England Public Hearing June 2012 1

New Haven-Hartford-Springfield Rail Corridor Glory Days: 1925-1955 22 trains/day in 1947 Bankers Ltd 3-hour service to NYC Sleeper, parlor & grill cars on most trains Connections to Boston, Albany & Montreal Overnight to NYC, Pittsburgh & Washington Amtrak Today 6 daily round-trip Amtrak trains 4 round-trip shuttles between New Haven and Springfield Only 2 roundtrip trains (including the Vermonter) operate directly south of New Haven 2

Program Goals: NHHS Rail Program Recap Enhanced regional rail service that accommodates both commuter and intercity travel Frequent service in the peak hours Seamless connections to Amtrak & Metro North Continued growth in local freight rail service Long Term Vision 25 Round Trip Trains Additional connections to Boston, and Montreal 30 minute, bi-directional, peak hour service Hourly off-peak service Start-up Service 2016 17 Round Trip Trains 45 minute frequency in the peak hour, hourly off-peak Bi-directional service south of Hartford 3

Regional Vision 4

Making Connections Grand Central, Penn Station or Boston Acela trains to NYP/BOS Metro-North trains to Grand Central Terminal Expanded Service to Massachusetts/VT Knowledge Corridor to Greenfield Boston-Springfield-NHV-NYP via the Inland Route) Bus Shuttle to Bradley Airport at Windsor Locks Transfer to/from New Britain Busway at Hartford & Future Newington Station & West Hartford 5

The Rail Corridor First Trains: 1844 Length: 62 miles Tracks 23.3 miles of double track 38.7 miles of single track Bridges &Culverts: 180 Hartford Viaduct Connecticut River At-Grade Crossings: 38 public Current Stations: New Haven; Wallingford; Meriden; Berlin; Hartford; Windsor; Windsor Locks; Springfield 6

Program Scope: Modernizing the Infrastructure & Service 1. Track & signal improvements over 44.5 miles 2. Upgrades to 180 bridges and drainage structures to accommodate double tracking 3. 38 At-grade crossing upgrades to enhance safety 4. Station enhancements & future new stations 5. New train equipment 7

Current Funding Status Preliminary Program Cost: $647 million Does not include: new stations; new trains; Upgrades to the Connecticut River Bridge or Hartford Viaduct Funding Awards & Bond Proceeds Available to Date: $471 million Meriden-Berlin: $40 million in Federal funding New Haven-Hartford: $121 million in Federal funding Hartford-Springfield: $30 million in Federal Funding State Funding: $280 million in bond authority Additional Annual Funding Opportunities Additional FRA funding under the HSR funding program Other funding sources: FTA for new stations and regional trains 8

Phasing NHHS Improvements Work has Been Phased To Match Funding Availability FRA awarding grants as funding becomes available Each grant requires projects with Independent Utility Current Phases Phase 1: Meriden-Newington (ARRA: obligated) Phase 2: New Haven-Hartford (FY 2010: awarded) Phase 3A: Hartford-Windsor (ARRA: obligated) Phase 3B: Windsor-Springfield (unfunded) Phase 4: Regional Rail Upgrades (unfunded) Phase 5: Ongoing State-of-good-repair Upgrades (unfunded) 9

Phasing NHHS Improvements Phase 1: Meriden-Newington Adds 10.2 miles of second track between Meriden and Newington Cost: $60 million $40 million Federal; $20 million State) Funding fully obligated Berlin (Amtrak) Meriden (Amtrak) 10

Phasing NHHS Improvements Phase 2: New Haven-Hartford Adds all new track, signal, bridge and station infrastructure for additional service between New Haven and Hartford Adds new service during peak morning/evening rush hour Cost: $262 million $121 Federal $141 State Funding Awarded, Awaiting Obligation Berlin (Amtrak) Springfield Union Station (Amtrak) Windsor Locks (Amtrak) Meriden (Amtrak) Hartford Union Station (Amtrak) Wallingford (Amtrak) Windsor (Amtrak) New Haven State St. Station New Haven Union Station (Amtrak) 11

Phasing NHHS Improvements Phase 3A: Hartford-Windsor 7.5 miles of double track/sidings Structure repairs New signal system/ptc extending from Hartford to Springfield 9 at-grade crossing upgrades New interlocking Cost: $43 million Federal: $30 million State: $13 million Funding fully obligated Springfield Union Station (Amtrak) Windsor Locks (Amtrak) Berlin (Amtrak) Windsor (Amtrak) Hartford Union Station (Amtrak) Meriden (Amtrak) Wallingford (Amtrak) New Haven State St. Station New Haven Union Station (Amtrak) 12

Phasing NHHS Improvements Phase 3B: Windsor-Springfield Complete double track/sidings to Springfield Structure repairs Station Upgrades at Windsor and Windsor Locks Upgrade remaining at-grade crossings New interlockings Efforts underway to secure funding Springfield Union Station (Amtrak) Windsor Locks (Amtrak) Berlin (Amtrak) Windsor (Amtrak) Hartford Union Station (Amtrak) Meriden (Amtrak) Wallingford (Amtrak) New Haven State St. Station New Haven Union Station (Amtrak) 13

Phasing NHHS Improvements Enfield Phase 4: Regional Rail Upgrades Constructs four new NHHS stations (North Haven; Newington; West Hartford; Enfield) and adds a platform to the State St. Station New train equipment Efforts underway to secure FTA funding Newington West Hartford North Haven New Haven State St. Station 14

Phasing NHHS Improvements Phase 5: Ongoing Stateof-Good-Repair Program Repair Hartford Viaduct and Connecticut River Bridge Upgrade other structures and facilities as required 15

Why Make the Investment? Fast, Convenient Regional Transportation Connects/integrates regional transportation across New England More frequent service Faster service Creates Engine For Local Economic & Station Area Development Construction-related & long-term job growth Provides the connections to livable communities along the rail line Establishes An Interconnected Public Transportation System for Connecticut s Future Metro North Shoreline East Amtrak Local bus services Busway Bradley International Airport 16

Proactive Public Involvement Process Regular Stakeholder Meetings Towns Adjacent property owners Institutional stakeholders Continuous Public Outreach Up-to-date, interactive website www.nhhsrail.com Project updates Project specific issues: crossings; stations Newsletter & Email blasts Submit comments Multi-lingual information Links to social media sites Facebook and Twitter At Your Service CT staff/pmt available for questions, updates, heads-up, complaints 17

Environmental Assessment/Environmental Impact Evaluation A decision-making document required under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for any federally-funded projects Also required under the Connecticut Environmental Policy Act (CEPA) for state-funded projects Lead Agency - Federal Railroad Administration Sponsoring Agency - Connecticut Department of Transportation Along with Cooperation from Federal Transit Administration 18

Purpose and Need Alternatives Evaluation Topics Analyzed Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences - Physical Includes Air Quality, Noise & Vibration, Visual/Aesthetics - Ecological Systems Includes Wetlands, Floodplains, Threatened and Endangered Species (only some of the topics) - Human Includes Socio-economic, Transportation & Traffic, Environmental Justice, Cultural Resources (among other topics) 19

Key Issues Wetland Impacts & Floodplains - Will require permitting/mitigation Noise Impacts - Train horn noise at grade crossings and stations will not be louder, but will be more frequent (can be mitigated with the use of Quiet Zones) Endangered Species - Potentially occurring in the study corridor. If found, any mitigation requirements made through coordination with CT DEEP, OPM, and US Fish & Wildlife. Traffic Issues - Mitigation through signal timing and phasing, turning lanes, potential intersection improvements near stations, and review of at-grade crossings to determine any potential closures 20

Key Issues Property Acquisitions - 16 full and 11 partial property acquisitions in the vicinity of the stations. - Potential for minimal ROW expansion may result in small acquisitions adjacent to tracks. - 2 full and 2 partial property acquisitions for Armory Street site (Springfield Layover and Maintenance). Cultural Resources - Entire corridor eligible for National Register of Historic Places. - Potential impacts and mitigation will be evaluated under a Programmatic Agreement. Secondary and Cumulative Impacts - Generally beneficial due to induced development. - Potential traffic congestion to be mitigated with traffic signal and intersection improvements. 21

Key Issues Prime Farmlands and Farmlands of Statewide Importance - Potential of approximately 4 acres of impact along the 62 mile corridor (can be mitigated through application of the Farmland Conversion Impact Rating Form and compensatory mitigation) Safety and Security - Increased Passenger Train Frequency and Speed Grade crossings will be improved with supplemental safety devices. Construction Impacts - Temporary impacts including train speed restrictions, noise, air quality, water quality, disposal of construction waste, contaminated soils, and utility impacts. Mitigation incorporating Best Management Practices, maintenance of traffic, and compliance with required permits. 22

Near-Term Schedule 1. EA/EIE under public review (45 day comment period) until June 22nd 2. Public Hearings being held during comment period 3. Review comments received and prepare responses to be included in final environmental document 4. Submit Final document to FRA/FTA. Anticipate a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) in July 2012 NOTE: Completion of the NEPA/CEPA process required for obligation of federal funding and advancing the project design and construction 23

Near-Term Schedule (Continued) 2012: Complete Preliminary Engineering 2012: Start Final Design 2012: Begin Advance Signal Relocation 2013: Complete Design/Submit Permits 2013: Begin Construction on Grade Crossings, Interlockings, and Track Realignment 2014: Begin Construction on Bridges, Culverts, Signals, Stations, and Track 2016: Complete Construction and Launch Service 24

Comments can be submitted via www.nhhsrail.com NHHS Project Contacts John Bernick, CT DOT Connecticut Department of Transportation, Office of Design, Room 3401 NWA 2800 Berlin Turnpike Newington CT 06131-7546 (860) 594-3304 Mark Alexander, CT DOT Connecticut Department of Transportation, Office of Environmental Planning, Room 2150 NE 2800 Berlin Turnpike Newington CT 06131-7546 (860) 594-2931 25