General Vehicle Information

Similar documents
Design and Integration of Suspension, Brake and Steering Systems for a Formula SAE Race Car

Design and Analysis of suspension system components

Appendix X New Features in v2.4 B

Fundamentals of Steering Systems ME5670

Drag Factors in Spins and on Hills

Part 1. The three levels to understanding how to achieve maximize traction.

STUDY OF ROLL CENTER SAURABH SINGH *, SAGAR SAHU ** ABSTRACT

TECHNICAL NOTE. NADS Vehicle Dynamics Typical Modeling Data. Document ID: N Author(s): Chris Schwarz Date: August 2006

A double-wishbone type suspension is used in the front. A multi-link type suspension is used in the rear. Tread* mm (in.) 1560 (61.

DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF PUSH ROD ROCKER ARM SUSPENSION USING MONO SPRING

Parameters. Version 1.0 6/18/2008 1

Torque steer effects resulting from tyre aligning torque Effect of kinematics and elastokinematics

Collegiate Design Series Suspension 101. Steve Lyman Formula SAE Lead Design Judge DaimlerChrysler Corporation

Vehicle Load Transfer. Wm Harbin Technical Director BND TechSource

SUMMARY OF STANDARD K&C TESTS AND REPORTED RESULTS

Extracting Tire Model Parameters From Test Data

4.5 Ride and Roll Kinematics Front Suspension

Analysis and control of vehicle steering wheel angular vibrations

2008 MITSUBISHI LANCER EVOLUTION OFFERS SUPERCAR HANDLING. The 2008 Lancer Evolution succeeds a model that was considered one of the best-handling

iracing.com Williams-Toyota FW31 Quick Car Setup Guide

Designing and Hard Point Optimization of Suspension System of a Three-Wheel Hybrid Vehicle

Assetto Corsa Car Modding Worksheet v0.16

The Center for Auto Safety

The Center for Auto Safety

EXPERIMENTAL TEST OF OCCUPANT ENTRAPMENT FORD TAURUS INTO REAR OF FORD EXPLORER 30% OFFSET, 70 MPH. Test Date: August 3, 2010

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF FORMULA SAE CAR SUSPENSION MEMBERS. For the degree of Master of Science in

Design Methodology of Steering System for All-Terrain Vehicles

FE151 Aluminum Association Inc. Impact of Vehicle Weight Reduction on a Class 8 Truck for Fuel Economy Benefits

SPMM OUTLINE SPECIFICATION - SP20016 issue 2 WHAT IS THE SPMM 5000?

X4-X7 Hyper 600cc Chassis Setup Guide

Unit HV04K Knowledge of Heavy Vehicle Chassis Units and Components

ME 466 PERFORMANCE OF ROAD VEHICLES 2016 Spring Homework 3 Assigned on Due date:

Dynamic Analysis of Double Wishbone and Double Wishbone with S Link + Toe Link

Suspension and Steering Alignment

COMPACT CYLINDER CYLINDER FORCE AND WEIGHT TABLE BASE WEIGHT EFFECTIVE AREA

Passenger Vehicle Steady-State Directional Stability Analysis Utilizing EDVSM and SIMON

TRUCK DESIGN FACTORS AFFECTING DIRECTIONAL BEHAVIOR IN BRAKING

Technical Report Lotus Elan Rear Suspension The Effect of Halfshaft Rubber Couplings. T. L. Duell. Prepared for The Elan Factory.

Modeling a Pothole Impact of an Agricultural Tractor Using HVE and SIMON

II YEAR AUTOMOBILE ENGINEERING AT AUTOMOTIVE CHASSIS QUESTION BANK UNIT I - LAYOUT, FRAME, FRONT AXLE AND STEERING SYSTEM

VEHICLE HANDLING BASICS

2008 LCF. Dimensions FORD LCF. Ford LCF. May 2007

Single Vehicle Loss of Control

TIRE BASICS GENERAL INFORMATION WHAT S INSIDE A TIRE TREAD BELTS BELT EDGE INSULATION BODY PLIES INNERLINER CASING BEAD SIDEWALL BEAD FILLER

Suspension systems and components

Modeling tire vibrations in ABS-braking

Driven Damped Harmonic Oscillations

University of Alberta Design Report

VEHICLE DYNAMICS. A factsheet on Volvo Cars Scalable Product Architecture chassis technology

Kinematic Analysis of Roll Motion for a Strut/SLA Suspension System Yung Chang Chen, Po Yi Tsai, I An Lai

SPMM OUTLINE SPECIFICATION - SP20016 issue 2 WHAT IS THE SPMM 5000?

SUSPENSION 2-1 SUSPENSION TABLE OF CONTENTS

OptimumDynamics. Computational Vehicle Dynamics Help File

All dimensions are in inches (millimeters) unless otherwise noted. All dimensions are measured at curb weight with standard tires and wheels.

CLASS A MOTORHOME CHASSIS

ME 455 Lecture Ideas, Fall 2010

A4 AVANT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS

Model Library Power Transmission

FRONTAL OFF SET COLLISION

Jim Kasprzak 36 years racing experience Developed 7-post testing for GM Racing Currently Race Engineer for SRT Viper Expertise includes:

4.0-liter, 6-cylinder, 24-valve, aluminum alloy block with aluminum alloy head. Valve Train DOHC, 4-valve/cylinder DOHC, 4-valve/cylinder

Jaroslav Maly & team CAE departament. AV ENGINEERING, a.s.

Comparison of HVE simulations to NHTSA full-frontal barrier testing: an analysis of 3D and 2D stiffness coefficients in SIMON and EDSMAC4

Real Square 2011 RS400PRO Quick Start User Instructions v. 10.1

along with standard XT2 Instruction Manual and also XT2 18 Supplementary Sheet.

2.007 Design and Manufacturing I

Simulation Study of Oscillatory Vehicle Roll Behavior During Fishhook Maneuvers

UNIBODY/FRAME/WHEEL ALIGNMENT II ABCT 2212

Improvement of Vehicle Dynamics by Right-and-Left Torque Vectoring System in Various Drivetrains x

CHAPTER 4 : RESISTANCE TO PROGRESS OF A VEHICLE - MEASUREMENT METHOD ON THE ROAD - SIMULATION ON A CHASSIS DYNAMOMETER

SUSPENSION 2-1 SUSPENSION TABLE OF CONTENTS

DRIVE-CONTROL COMPONENTS

W3500/W4500 GAS SPECIFICATIONS PAGE

Dimensions and Capacities. High Roof LWB EL (SRW/DRW) Description A Length / Med. Roof RWB

CRASH TEST REPORT FOR PERIMETER BARRIERS AND GATES TESTED TO SD-STD-02.01, REVISION A, MARCH Anti-Ram Bollards

F53 Super Duty Motorhome Chassis

The Effect of Weight Distribution on a Quarter Midget. Joey Dille

Design and Validation of Hydraulic brake system for Utility Vehicle

Analysis of Tire Rub Rail Interaction

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 110 TIRE SELECTION AND RIMS

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 110 TIRE SELECTION AND RIMS

Tech Tip: Trackside Tire Data

VEHICLE REPORT Nissan Altima PRICING SUMMARY. Price Component MSRP. Base Price $22, Total Options $0.00. Vehicle Subtotal $22,380.

III B.Tech I Semester Supplementary Examinations, May/June

Hemet High School NATEF SUSPENSION AND STEERING CHECKLIST. Name Date Period

2012 Audi Q5 2.0T. Technical specifications. Technical specifications Audi Q5 2.0 TFSI. Page 1 of 2 ENGINE:

ROBUST PROJECT Norwegian Public Roads Administration / Force Technology Norway AS

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 110 TIRE SELECTION AND RIMS

2019 LEXUS UX 200 SPECIFICATIONS

DESIGN, ANALYSIS AND FABRICATION OF BRAKING SYSTEM WITH REAR INBOARD BRAKES IN BAJA ATV

University of Wisconsin-Platteville Formula SAE Design Report

Modern Auto Tech Study Guide Chapter 67 & 69 Pages Suspension & Steering 32 Points. Automotive Service

Chassis Dynamics. BMW Technical Training. BMW of North America, LLC Technical Training ST1115 8/1/12. Reference Manual. The Ultimate Driving Machine

Simulating and Prototyping a Formula SAE Race Car Suspension System

CRASH TEST REPORT FOR PERIMETER BARRIERS AND GATES TESTED TO SD-STD-02.01, REVISION A, MARCH Anti-Ram Bollards

F53 Super Duty Motorhome Chassis

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 110 TIRE SELECTION AND RIMS

JOURNEY CANADIAN SPECIFICATIONS

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 110 TIRE SELECTION AND RIMS

White Paper: The Physics of Braking Systems

Transcription:

Vehicle #3921 Chevrolet Equinox (2CNALBEW8A6XXXXXX) Inspection Date: 1-Feb-211 Year 21 Make Model Body Style HVE Display Name: Year Range: Sisters and Clones: Vehicle Category: Vehicle Class: VIN: Date of Manufacture: Drivetrain: Number of Axles: Driver Position: Engine Location: ABS: Front GAWR: Rear GAWR: GVWR: Odometer: Weight Distribution: Color: Chevrolet Equinox LS Chevrolet Equinox LS 21-212 Terrain SUV 2 2CNALBEW8A6XXXXXX May-213 FWD 2 LHD Front Yes 2593 lb 2736 lb 4964 lb 11,37 mi 57.4/42.6 Red General Vehicle Information No Primary Inspection Photograph No Secondary Inspection Photograph Overall Length: Overall Width: Overall Height: A Front Track Width: Rear Track Width: Left Wheelbase: Right Wheelbase: Average Wheelbase: 188.32 in 72.72 in 66.38 in 62.54 in 61.75 in 112.64 in 112.56 in 112.6 in Front X Distance: 84.55 in Rear X Distance: -13.77 in Right Y Distance: 36.45 in Left Y Distance: -36.27 in Top Z Distance: -38.11 in Bottom Z Distance: 16.29 in Front Area: 3932.4 in^2 Front Drag Coefficient:.36 Side Area: 8716.4 in^2 Side Drag Coefficient:. Top Area: 12583.51 in^2 Top Drag Coefficient:. Back Area: 3932.4 in^2 Back Drag Coefficient:. Bottom Area: 12583.51 in^2 Bottom Drag Coefficient:. Trailer Hitch Connection Front: No Trailer Hitch Connection Rear: No A - The overall height illustrated will differ from the overall height in HVE because HVE uses Unloaded wheel radius while we collect the data while vehicle is at ride height B - Throughout this report Blue values represent values inspected, measured or calculated by Vehiclemetrics. Black values represent specification data. Red values represent generic data. 1 of 22

Exterior Geometry Verification Vehicle #3921 Chevrolet Equinox (2CNALBEW8A6XXXXXX) The color map below is a comparison of the measured data, using a laser scanner versus the HVE model geometry. This is a quality check that we perform to assure that the HVE model accurately represents the vehicle measured. (Comparison performed using Polyworks V12) [inch] 2 of 22

Vehicle Mass, Center of Gravity and Inertia Vehicle #3921 Chevrolet Equinox (2CNALBEW8A6XXXXXX) Center of Gravity Information Total Mass Sprung Mass CGx 48.2 in 46.94 in CGy -.45 in -.9 in CGz C 26.46 in 28.27 in Vehicle Weight Vehicle Weight Sprung Weight Left Front 1115.352 lb 982.635 lb Right Front 176.684 lb 965.47 lb Left Rear 823.191 lb 691.723 lb Right Rear 86.55 lb 7.431 lb Total Weight 3821.778 lb 3339.836 lb D Inertia X: Inertia Y: Inertia Z: Inertia Sprung Unsprung 552.59 lb-in-s^2 598.86 lb-in-s^2 2758.67 lb-in-s^2 1736.53 lb-in-s^2 27777.41 lb-in-s^2 281.8 lb-in-s^2 Total 611.44 lb-in-s^2 29245.21 lb-in-s^2 29858.49 lb-in-s^2 E E E C - See note A on page 1 D Total weight is the input when building an HVE vehicle. The sprung weight illustrated will differ from the sprung weight in HVE. In HVE the program only subtracts the wheel weight and axle weight(if solid axle) from the total weight to calculate sprung weight. We use vibration testing to estimate the total unsprung weight. This results in the sprung weight in HVE being larger than ours. E Sprung inertia is the input when building an HVE vehicle. The total inertia presented in our datasheet will differ a small amount from the value you see in HVE. When HVE calculates total inertia, it utilizes the sprung weight CGz it had calculated which per note A,B differs a small amount from sprung weight CGz in our datasheet 3 of 22

Crush Stiffness Data Vehicle #3921 Chevrolet Equinox (2CNALBEW8A6XXXXXX) NHTSA Test(s) Used: 6828 738 7531 Surface Front: Side: Rear: Top: Bottom: A Stiffness: 623.53 lb/in 78. lb/in 29.67 lb/in 25. lb/in 25. lb/in B Stiffness: Kv Stiffness: 25.61 lb/in^2 236.28 lb/in^2 4. lb/in^2 48.65 lb/in^2 123. lb/in^2 19.3 lb/in^2 5. lb/in^2 75. lb/in^2 5. lb/in^2 75. lb/in^2 Conversion Height: () 3. in 3. in 3. in 3. in 3. in : Front Stiffness Coefficients Kv Bx + A 16 14 12 Force (lb) 1 8 6 4 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 Crush (in) 12 Rear Stiffness Coefficients Kv Bx + A 35 Side Stiffness Coefficients Kv Bx + A 1 3 Force (lb) 8 6 4 Force (lb) 25 2 15 1 2 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 Crush (in) 1 2 3 4 5 6 Crush (in) 4 of 22

Powertrain Data Engine Data Transmission and Final Drive Engine Name 2.4L_I4_Ecotec Final Drive Ratio 3.23 Number of Points 5 Differential Type Transverse Engine Displacement 2.4L 146. cu. in Drivetrain Inertia 6.5 lb-in-s^2 Engine Configuration I4 Transmission Type Automatic Compression Ratio 11.2 : 1 Number of Forward Speeds 6 Stroke Length 3.85 in Reverse Ratio - 2.88 Idle Speed 6 RPM Ratio 1 4.48 Ratio 2 2.87 Ratio 3 1.84 Automatic Transmission Shift Data Ratio 4 1.41 Engine Speed Minimum 18 RPM Ratio 5 1. Engine Speed Maximum 57 RPM Ratio 6.74 Upshift Minimum 2 % Upshift Maximum Downshift Minimum Downshift Maximum 6 % 5 % 9 % Wide Open Throttle Closed Throttle Engine Power 175 125 Power (HP) 75 25-25 -75-125 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Engine RPM Wide Open Throttle Closed Throttle Engine Torque 15 1 Torque (ft-lb) 5-5 -1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Engine RPM 5 of 22

Tire and Wheel Data Wheel X Location Wheel Y Location Wheel Z Location Number of Tires Tire Spacing Tire Rolling Diameter: Rim Width: Wheel Size: Manufacturer: Model: Maximum Pressure: Maximum Load: Pressure: Left Front Right Front Left Rear Right Rear 46.93 in 46.93 in -65.66 in -65.66 in -31.18 in 31.36 in -3.79 in 3.96 in 14.35 in 14.35 in 14.38 in 14.38 in 1 1 1 1 - - - - 27.7 in 28. in 27.7 in 27.9 in 7.5 in 7.5 in 7.5 in 7.5 in P225/65R17 1T P225/65R17 1T P225/65R17 1T P225/65R17 1T Michelin Michelin Michelin Michelin Latitude Latitude Latitude Latitude 44 psi 44 psi 44 psi 44 psi 1765 lb 1765 lb 1765 lb 1765 lb 34 psi 32 psi 33 psi 33 psi Depth: 9 /32nd in 9 /32nd in 9 /32nd in 9 /32nd in Treadwear: Traction Rating: Temperature Rating: Wheel Mass: 46.9 lb 46.9 lb 46.9 lb 46.9 lb Spin Inertia: 13.5 lb-in-s^2 13.5 lb-in-s^2 13.5 lb-in-s^2 13.5 lb-in-s^2 Steer Inertia: 6.733 lb-in-s^2 6.733 lb-in-s^2 6.733 lb-in-s^2 6.733 lb-in-s^2 Wheel Texture Image W_21ChevroletEquinox.bmp W_21ChevroletEquinox.bmp Tire File Name V_29_PassCar...225-65R17 V_29_PassCar...225-65R17 6 of 22

Suspension - HVE Input Data General Physical Data Type: Spring Type: Left Front Right Front Left Rear Right Rear Independent Independent Independent Independent Coil Coil Coil Coil Coil Diameter/Leaf Width: Wire Diameter/Leaf Thickness: Number of Coils/Leafs: Length of Coil/Leaf: Sway Bar Diameter: Solid Axle Weight: Solid Axle Inertia: - - - - - - - - Spring and Shock Data Left Front Right Front Left Rear Right Rear Ride Rate (Wheel Center Rate): 23.8 lb/in 23.8 lb/in 162.6 lb/in 162.6 lb/in Auxiliary Roll Stiffness: 157.5 in-lb/deg 157.5 in-lb/deg 75.2 in-lb/deg 75.2 in-lb/deg Roll Center Height: n/a n/a n/a n/a Lateral Spring Spacing: n/a n/a n/a n/a Damping at Wheel: 7.369 lb-s/in 7.369 lb-s/in 4.53 lb-s/in 4.53 lb-s/in Coulomb Friction: 5. lb 5. lb 5. lb 5. lb Friction Nullband: 5. in/s 5. in/s 5. in/s 5. in/s Maximum Jounce to Stop: 7.559 in 7.559 in 2.756 in 2.756 in Rebound Max Deflection: 3.136 in 3.136 in 3.813 in 3.813 in Linear Deflection Rate of Stop: 3. lb/in 3. lb/in 3. lb/in 3. lb/in Cubic Deflection Rate of Stop: 6. lb/in^3 6. lb/in^3 6. lb/in^3 6. lb/in^3 Energy Ratio of Stop: 5 % 5 % 5 % 5 % Intertandem Transfer: % % % % Joint Stop Height (Thickness): n/a n/a n/a n/a Front Suspension Rear Suspension No Photograph of Front Suspension No Photograph of Rear Suspension 7 of 22

Suspension - Wheel Center Rate Measurement Wheel Center Rate is the vertical force per unit vertical displacement at the location along the spindle corresponding to the wheel centerline, measured relative to the chassis (Milliken, W.F. and Milliken, D.L. "Race Car Vehicle Dynamics" S.A.E. 1995 p 581) Wheel Center Rate that we utilize in the vehicle model is the average of the left and right side wheel positions for the front and rear. Ride Rate (Wheel Center Rate): Wheel Center Rate(Total): Wheel Center Rate (Rebound): Wheel Center Rate (Jounce): Left Front 23.8 lb/in 266.9 lb/in 33.1 lb/in 222.9 lb/in Right Front Left Rear 23.8 lb/in 162.6 lb/in 261.4 lb/in 182.7 lb/in 32.2 lb/in 18.9 lb/in 227.9 lb/in 223.3 lb/in Right Rear 162.6 lb/in 186.4 lb/in 192.9 lb/in 226.6 lb/in Maximum Rebound (3.1 in) 3 Front Wheel Center Rate Maximum Jounce (7.6 in) 25 2 Force (lb) 15 1 5 LF Spring RF Spring Ride Height 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Suspension Displacement (in) Force (lb) Maximum Rebound (3.8 in) 2 18 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 Rear Wheel Center Rate Maximum Jounce (2.8 in) LR Spring RR Spring Ride Height 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 Suspension Displacement (in) 8 of 22

Suspension - Auxiliary Roll Stiffness Measurement Auxiliary Roll Stiffness is the roll rate contribution by the anti-roll bar (sway bar). If the auxiliary roll stiffness is measured then the value used in the vehicle model is an average of the test values for the front and rear. If no anti-roll bar is present, auxiliary roll stiffness is assumed to be. If the auxiliary roll stiffness was not measured then it is calculated by measuring the geometry and calculating the installation ratio. This is the same procedure and formula as used by EDC Auxiliary Roll Stiffness: Front 157.5 in-lb/deg Rear 75.2 in-lb/deg Sway Bar Diameter: r1: 14. in 21. in r2: 4.5 in 6. in r3: 9.5 in 6.3 in r4: 9.5 in 15. in L: t: 24. in 62.5 in 26. in 61.8 in Aux Roll Front Rear 16 Roll Stiffness (ls/rad) 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 1 2 3 4 Test Number 9 of 22

Suspension - Damping Rate Calculation HVE uses a damping rate at the wheel. To estimate the damping rate at the wheel we first calculate the critical damping rate for the wheel. We then estimate the damping coefficient using a constant displacement vibration tester. The damping rate we use is calculated by multiplying the critical damping rate times the damping coefficient Left Front Right Front Left Rear Right Rear Damping at wheel (for HVE) 7.369 lb-s/in 7.369 lb-s/in 4.53 lb-s/in 4.53 lb-s/in Damping at Individual Wheel: 7.795 lb-s/in 6.943 lb-s/in 4.749 lb-s/in 4.256 lb-s/in Tire Rate: 3131.382 lb/in 253.83 lb/in 3131.382 lb/in 253.83 lb/in Wheel Hop Frequency: 15.8 Hz 15.6 Hz 15.7 Hz 15.8 Hz Wheel (Tire and Rim) Mass: 46.9 lb 46.9 lb 46.9 lb 46.9 lb Unsprung Mass: 132.7 lb 111.6 lb 131.5 lb 16.1 lb Sprung Mass: 982.6 lb 965. lb 691.7 lb 7.4 lb Damping Coefficient: Critical Damping Rate:.386 2.2 lb-s/in.386 18. lb-s/in.277 17.1 lb-s/in.277 15.4 lb-s/in Adhesion (%) 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Adhesion ƒ hop 5 1 15 2 25 Frequency (Hz) LF Test 1 LF Test 2 LF Test 3 Hop Calculation Procedure: Unsprung Mass (m u ) Critical Damping Rate (C cr ) = 2 * Sqrt[ ((k t +k s )*(m t ))] = (k t +k s ) (2*π*f hop ) Phase LF Test 1 LF Test 2 LF Test 3 Hop Phase (rad) 2.5 2 1.5 Damping Coefficient (ζ) = 1 (2*π*f hop ) * θ Δω 1.5 5 1 15 ω(rad/s) Damping at Wheel = ζ * C cr Note: Data for Left Front Wheel is shown only F - Our damping rates will be lower than a similar vehicle's damping rate calculated by EDC since vehicles produced by EDC assume the vehicle is critically damped. 1 of 22

Suspension - Change in Half-Track vs. Jounce/Rebound Vehicle #3921 Chevrolet Equinox (2CNALBEW8A6XXXXXX) As the suspension moves through the jounce and rebound phase, the wheels could move inboard or outboard relative to the chassis. This results in a change in the track width. HVE uses half of the track width (half-track) to define this motion. Front Track Width: 62.5 in Rear Track Width: 61.8 in Front Half-Track Width: Rear Half-Track Width: 31.3 in 3.9 in Maximum Jounce (-7.6 in) 1 Front Change in Half-Track Width vs Jounce/Rebound Maximum Rebound (3.1 in).5 Change in Half-Track (in) -.5-1 -1.5-2 -8-7 -6-5 -4-3 -2-1 1 2 3 4 Suspension Displacement (in) Maximum Jounce (-2.8 in) 1 Rear Change in Half-Track Width vs Jounce/Rebound Maximum Rebound (3.8 in).5 Change in Half-Track (in) -.5-1 -1.5-2 -3-2 -1 1 2 3 4 Suspension Displacement (in) 11 of 22

Suspension - Camber vs. Jounce/Rebound As the suspension moves through the jounce and rebound phase, the individual wheel cambers can change. HVE uses a camber versus jounce and rebound to define this motion for each individual wheel. Camber at Ride Height: Left Front -.6 deg Right Front Left Rear -.5 deg -.7 deg Right Rear -.8 deg Camber (deg) Camber (deg) 1.3 1.1.9.7.5.3.1 -.1 -.3 -.5 -.7 -.9-1.1 2.6 2.1 1.6 1.1.6.1 -.4 -.9-1.4 Maximum Jounce (-7.6 in) Maximum Jounce (-2.8 in) Left Right Ride Height Camber Front Maximum Rebound (3.1 in) -8-7 -6-5 -4-3 -2-1 1 2 3 4 Suspension Displacement (in) Left Right Ride Height Camber Rear Maximum Rebound (3.8 in) -1.9-3 -2-1 1 2 3 4 Suspension Displacement (in) 12 of 22

Steering and Alignment - HVE Input Data General Descriptive Data Steering Type: Axle Steerable: Power Assist: Front Rack & Pinion Yes Electric Rear - No - Steering Data Left Front Right Front Left Rear Right Rear Steering Gear Ratio: 17.35 : 1 17.35 : 1 - - Stop Angle: 29.8 deg -29.6 deg - - Steering Stop Linear Stiffness: 3.6 ft-lb/deg 3.6 ft-lb/deg - - Steering Stop Energy Ratio: 5 % 5 % - - Steering Column Friction: 5. in-lb 5. in-lb - - Steering Column Inertia:. lb-in-s^2. lb-in-s^2 - - Steering Column Stiffness: 1.e^6 ft-lb/deg 1.e^6 ft-lb/deg - - Steering Linkage Mass:. lb-s^2/in. lb-s^2/in - - Steering Linkage Damp:. lb-s/in. lb-s/in - - Steering Friction Lag: 4.3 deg/s 4.3 deg/s - - Alignment Data Caster: King Pin Inclination: Steering Offset: Toe: Camber Constant (Solid Axle): Roll Steer Coefficient (Solid Axle): Roll Steer Constant: Roll Steer Linear: Roll Steer Quad: Roll Steer Cubic: Left Front Right Front Left Rear Right Rear -.9 deg -3.7 deg - - 12.9 deg 12.9 deg - - 1.61 in 1.61 in - -.17 in -.2 in - - - - - - - - - -.14651 deg.14651 deg. deg. deg.14828 deg/in.14828 deg/in. deg/in. deg/in.997 deg/in^2.997 deg/in^2. deg/in^2. deg/in^2 -.481 deg/in^3 -.481 deg/in^3. deg/in^3. deg/in^3 13 of 22

Steering - Steering System Measurements Steering Data Left Front Right Front Left Rear Right Rear Steering Gear Ratio: 17.35 : 1 17.35 : 1 - - Max Wheel Angle 29.8 deg -29.6 deg - - Turns Lock to Lock: 3.1 3.1 - - Ackermann Steering 57.7 % 53.9 % - - Max Steering Wheel Angle 542 deg 54 deg - - Maximum Left Turn (-3 deg) Steering Maximum Right Turn (3 deg) 46 y = 17.262x R² =.996 Steering Wheel Rotation (deg) 26 6-14 -34-54 -3-25 -2-15 -1-5 5 1 15 2 25 3 Tire Angle (deg) 14 of 22

Suspension - Roll Steer Coefficients As the suspension moves through the jounce and rebound phase, the steer axle toe angle can change. Roll Steer is a measurement of the change in toe angle which produces a tendency to steer the vehicle as the suspension compresses. Solid Axles have a default Roll Steer value of deg. Roll Steer Constant Roll Steer Linear Roll Steer Quad Roll Steer Cubic Left.3379 deg.28194 deg/in Right -.447 deg.47125 deg/in Average.14651 deg.14828 deg/in -.1394 deg/in^2.14284 deg/in^2.997 deg/in^2.223 deg/in^3 -.1867 deg/in^3 -.481 deg/in^3 Maximum Jounce (-7.6 in) 1.25 Left Right Ride Height Roll-Steer Maximum Rebound (3.1 in) 1.5.85.65 Roll-Steer (rad).45.25.5 -.15 -.35 -.55 -.75-8 -7-6 -5-4 -3-2 -1 1 2 3 4 Suspension Displacement (in) 15 of 22

Brake Parameters - HVE Input Data Brake Type: Pedal Ratio Used: Disc 1. psi/lb Left Front Right Front Left Rear Right Rear Torque Ratio: 572.8 in-lb/psi 572.8 in-lb/psi 184.557 in-lb/psi 184.557 in-lb/psi Secondary Torque Ratio: - - 21.627 in-lb/psi 21.627 in-lb/psi Proportioning Ratio: - -.12.12 Proportioning Force: - - 37.84 psi 37.84 psi Pushout Pressure:. psi. psi. psi. psi Lag Time:. s. s. s. s Rise:. s. s. s. s Antilock Brakes: Effectiveness: Yes 5 % Yes Yes Yes 5 % 5 % 5 % Methodology for Calculation of Brake Parameters Front Rear T ratio = Slope T ratio secondary = Slope Brake Torque F proportion n proportion = T ratio secondary T ratio Brake Pedal Force 16 of 22

Brake - Test Data Left Front Right Front Left Rear Right Rear Test Torque Ratio: 599.374 in-lb/psi 546.227 in-lb/psi 189.541 in-lb/psi 179.2 in-lb/psi Test Secondary Torque Ratio: - - 22.52 in-lb/psi 2.734 in-lb/psi Test Proportioning Ratio: - -.126.121 Test Proportioning Force: - - 37.98 lb 37.7 lb Drag Force: 21.1 lb 24.47 lb 15.8 lb 19.1 lb Wheel Drag: 59.95 lb 68.94 lb 44.96 lb 53.95 lb Max Brake Force: 854.27 lb 785.33 lb 617.48 lb 59.5 lb Max Pedal Force: 21.69 lb 21.69 lb 139.67 lb 139.67 lb Brake Torque vs Pedal Force Average Front Average Rear 12 1 Brake Torque (ft-lb) 8 6 4 2 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 4 45 5 Brake Pedal Force (lb) 17 of 22

Appendix General Vehicle Data Parameter Value Description Weight Distribution: Vehicle weight distribution is calculated based upon measured masses at each wheel location. Overall Length: from laser scans of vehicle. Overall Width: from laser scans of vehicle. Overall Height: Front Track Width: Rear Track Width: Left Wheelbase: Right Wheelbase: Average Wheelbase: Front X Distance: Rear X Distance: Right Y Distance: Left Y Distance: Top Z Distance: Bottom Z Distance: Front Area: Front Drag Coefficient: Side Area: Side Drag Coefficient: Top Area: Top Drag Coefficient: Back Area: Back Drag Coefficient: Bottom Area: Bottom Drag Coefficient: from laser scans of vehicle. using a computerized 3D wheel alignment system. using a computerized 3D wheel alignment system. using a computerized 3D wheel alignment system. using a computerized 3D wheel alignment system. Average of left and right wheelbase measurements from computerized 3D wheel alignment system. position from sprung mass CG location to front of vehicle geometry. position from sprung mass CG location to rear of vehicle geometry. position from sprung mass CG location to right side of vehicle geometry. position from sprung mass CG location to left side of vehicle geometry. position from sprung mass CG location to top of vehicle geometry. position from sprung mass CG location to bottom of vehicle geometry position from sprung mass CG location to bottom of vehicle geometry. Value obtained from Internet Documentation from a cross section of the laser scan data along the centerline of the vehicle and includes tire area. Value is blank and is entered as. from a cross section of the laser scan data with the vehicle in a plan view. Value is blank and is entered as. from a cross section of the laser scan data at the vehicles overall width and includes tire area. Value is blank and is entered as. Same as top area. Value is blank and is entered as. Parameter CGx Total CGx Sprung CGy Total CGy Sprung CGz Total CGz Sprung Left Front Right Front Left Rear Right Rear Total Mass Total Inertia X: Vehicle Mass, Center of Gravity and Inertia Value Description See White Paper HVE-WP-212-2 See White Paper HVE-WP-212-2 See White Paper HVE-WP-212-2 See White Paper HVE-WP-212-2 by raising the rear wheel above ground. See WP-HVE-212-2 for further details. See White Paper HVE-WP-212-2 Mass is measured at each wheel with vehicle at ride height. Mass is measured at each wheel with vehicle at ride height. Mass is measured at each wheel with vehicle at ride height. Mass is measured at each wheel with vehicle at ride height. from summation of measured masses at each wheel. Power curve fit of measured inertia vs. vehicle mass. Based upon NHTSA Vehicle Inertial Parameter Measurement database. Total Inertia Y: Total Inertia Z: Power curve fit of measured inertia vs. vehicle mass. Based upon NHTSA Vehicle Inertial Parameter Measurement database. Power curve fit of measured inertia vs. vehicle mass. Based upon NHTSA Vehicle Inertial Parameter Measurement database. 18 of 22

Parameter Front Crush Stiffness: Side Crush Stiffness: Rear Crush Stiffness: Top Crush Stiffness: Bottom Crush Stiffness: Parameter Engine Configuration Compression Ratio Stroke Length Idle Speed Engine Speed Minimum Value Appendix Crush Stiffness Description data based on Class 2 SUV per SAE 96897 Value Powertrain Data Description Value obtained from Manufacturer Brochure Value obtained from Manufacturer Brochure Value obtained from Manufacturer Brochure data based on Class 2 SUV per SAE 96897 from NHTSA Crash Test Data using b=5 mph, Restitution = 1% data based on Class 2 SUV per SAE 96897 data based on Class 2 SUV per SAE 96897 data based on Class 2 SUV per SAE 96897 as 8% of the Minimum Speed Reported added to 2% of the Maximum Speed Reported. This is a generic value and the same methodology as EDC. Engine Speed Maximum Upshift Minimum Upshift Maximum Downshift Minimum Downshift Maximum Final Drive Ratio Differential Type Drivetrain Inertia Transmission Type Number of Forward Speeds Torque Ratios data. We currently utilize the same value as EDC Tire and Wheel Data Parameter Value Description Wheel X Location Wheel Y Location Wheel Z Location Number of Tires Tire Spacing Tire Rolling Diameter: Rim Width: Wheel Size: Manufacturer: Model: Maximum Pressure: Maximum Load: Pressure: Depth: Treadwear: Traction Rating: Temperature Rating: Wheel Mass: Spin Inertia: Steer Inertia: Wheel Texture Image Tire File Name as 2% of the Minimum Speed Reported added to 8% of the Maximum Speed Reported. This is a generic value and the same methodology as used by EDC. data. We currently utilize the same value as EDC data. We currently utilize the same value as EDC data. We currently utilize the same value as EDC Value obtained from Car and Driver - Buyers guide Value obtained from Manufacturer Brochure data based on Class 2 SUV per SAE 96897 Value obtained from Manufacturer Brochure Value obtained from Car and Driver - Buyers guide Value obtained from Car and Driver - Buyers guide Wheel location measured using a computerized 3D wheel alignment system. Its position is presented relative to the sprung mass CG. Wheel location measured using a computerized 3D wheel alignment system. Its position is presented relative to the sprung mass CG. Wheel location measured using a computerized 3D wheel alignment system. Its position is presented relative to the sprung mass CG. Number of tires noted during inspection of vehicle. This parameter is only applicable to dual tires. The spacing is measured during the vehicle inspection. Tire rolling diameter is measured using a computerized 3D wheel alignment system. Rim width is measured during the vehicle inspection. Tire pressure is set to recommended pressure for vehicle inspection and recorded. Tread depth is measured. Wheel is removed from the vehicle and weighed. Inertia based upon wheel physical measurements. Same procedure as EDC. Inertia based upon wheel physical measurements. Same procedure as EDC. Photograph of wheel is taken during vehicle inspection. based on Vehicle Year Make and Model 19 of 22

Appendix Suspension HVE Data Parameter Value Description Type: Spring Type: Coil Diameter/Leaf Width: Wire Diameter/Leaf Thickness: Number of Coils/Leafs: Length of Coil/Leaf: Sway Bar Diameter: Solid Axle Weight: Solid Axle Inertia: Ride Rate (Wheel Center Rate): Auxilliary Roll Stiffness: Roll Center Height: Lateral Spring Spacing: Damping at Wheel: Coulomb Friction: Friction Nullband: Maximum Jounce to Stop: Rebound Max Deflection: Linear Deflection Rate of Stop: Cubic Deflection Rate of Stop: Energy Ratio of Stop: Intertandem Transfer: Joint Stop Height (Thickness): Not Used Not Used data based on Class 2 SUV per SAE 96897 data based on Class 2 SUV per SAE 96897 See White Paper HVE-WP-212-2 See White Paper HVE-WP-212-2. The test is repeated at four roll angles. Any outlying tests are excluded from the calculation. by multiplying critical damping rate by damping coefficient obtained by testing. See White Paper HVE-WP-212-2 This value is assumed to be 5 lb if it is a coil spring suspension or 1 lb for a leaf spring suspension. Same as EDC. This value is assumed to be 5 in/s. Same as EDC. If there is a stop located on the vehicle the measurement is made. If there is no stop visible the maximum jounce is approximated by measuring the distance to full coil spring compression. during ride rate test. The vehicle is lifted under the sprung mass to allow the wheels to fully rebound. This value is assumed to be 3 lb/in for all vehicles. Same as EDC. This value is assumed to be 6 lb/in^3 for all vehicles. Same as EDC. This value is assumed to be 5% for all vehicles. Same as EDC. This value is assumed to be % for all vehicles. Same as EDC. during vehicle inspection. Parameter Wheel Center Rate (Total): Wheel Center Rate (Rebound): Wheel Center Rate (Jounce): Value Suspension - Wheel Center Rate Description This value represents a curve fit of ALL measurement points during our ride rate test. This value is provided for informational purposes only. This value represents a curve fit of measurement points during the rebound phase of our ride rate test. This value is provided for informational purposes only. This value represents a curve fit of measurement points during the jounce phase of our ride rate test. This value is provided for informational purposes only. Suspension - Auxiliary Roll Stiffness Measurements Parameter Value Description r1: These measurements are used to calculate the installation ratio of the sway bar per the method used by EDC. These value are only used if a roll stiffness test was not conducted. r2: r3: r4: These measurements are used to calculate the installation ratio of the sway bar per the method used by EDC. These value are only used if a roll stiffness test was not conducted. These measurements are used to calculate the installation ratio of the sway bar per the method used by EDC. These value are only used if a roll stiffness test was not conducted. These measurements are used to calculate the installation ratio of the sway bar per the method used by EDC. These value are only used if a roll stiffness test was not conducted. L: These measurements are used to calculate the installation ratio of the sway bar per the method used by EDC. These value are only used if a roll stiffness test was not conducted. t: These measurements are used to calculate the installation ratio of the sway bar per the method used by EDC. These value are only used if a roll stiffness test was not conducted. 2 of 22

Suspension - Damping Rate Calculation Parameter Value Description Tire Rate: Appendix See White Paper HVE-WP-212-2. Wheel deflection is measured during the ride rate test using a laser sensor. Wheel Hop Frequency: Wheel (Tire and Rim) Mass: Unsprung Mass: Sprung Mass: Damping Coefficient: Critical Damping Rate: See White Paper HVE-WP-212-2. This is the frequency at which a minimum adhesion occurs between the tire and ground plane during our suspension vibration test. This is used in the calcuation of damping coefficient and unsprung mass. Wheel removed from vehicle and weighed. See White Paper HVE WP-212-2. by: (Total mass measured at the wheels) minus (unsprung mass at all four wheels) Based on the phase slope measured during our suspension test. This methodology is known as the phase-slope method. by the Equation: 2*SQRT[ (Tire Rate + Wheel Center Rate)*1)* Total Mass at the Wheel] Suspension - Camber vs. Jounce/Rebound Parameter Value Description Camber at Ride Height: using a computerized 3D wheel alignment system. Steering and Alignment - HVE Input Data Parameter Value Description Steering Type: Axle Steerable: Power Assist: Steering Gear Ratio: Stop Angle: Steering Stop Linear Stiffness: Steering Stop Energy Ratio: Steering Column Friction: Steering Column Inertia: Steering Column Stiffness: Steering Linkage Mass: Steering Linkage Damp: Steering Friction Lag: Caster: King Pin Inclination: Steering Offset: Toe: Camber Constant (Solid Axle): Roll Steer Coefficient (Solid Axle): Roll Steer Constant: Roll Steer Linear: Roll Steer Quad: Roll Steer Cubic: Not Used See White Paper HVE-WP-212-2 using a computerized 3D wheel alignment system. The maximum wheel angle is recorded with vehicle steered fully to the left and fully to the right. This is a generic value and is used for all vehicles. Same as EDC This is a generic value and is used for all vehicles. Same as EDC This is a generic value and is used for all vehicles. Same as EDC This is a generic value and is used for all vehicles. Same as EDC This is a generic value and is used for all vehicles. Same as EDC This is a generic value and is used for all vehicles. Same as EDC This is a generic value and is used for all vehicles. Same as EDC This is a generic value and is used for all vehicles. Same as EDC using a computerized 3D wheel alignment system. using a computerized 3D wheel alignment system. using a computerized 3D wheel alignment system. using a computerized 3D wheel alignment system. using a computerized 3D wheel alignment system. by the 3rd Order Polynomial Describing the Curve Generated by plotting the Toe vs Suspension Travel by the 3rd Order Polynomial Describing the Curve Generated by plotting the Toe vs Suspension Travel by the 3rd Order Polynomial Describing the Curve Generated by plotting the Toe vs Suspension Travel by the 3rd Order Polynomial Describing the Curve Generated by plotting the Toe vs Suspension Travel 21 of 22

Steering - Steering System Measurements Parameter Value Description Max Wheel Angle Turns Lock to Lock: Ackermann Steering Max Steering Wheel Angle Appendix using a computerized 3D wheel alignment system. The maximum wheel angle is recorded with vehicle steered fully to the left and fully to the right. by measuring the steering wheel rotation at maximum left and right turns and dividing this by 36 degrees. The percentage of the measured total toe to toal toe based on the outisde wheel calculated with full(1%) Ackermann. Maximum steering wheel angle is measured when the steering wheel is turned lock to lock. Brake Parameters - HVE Input Data Parameter Value Description Brake Type: Pedal Ratio Used: Torque Ratio: Secondary Torque Ratio: Proportioning Ratio: Proportioning Force: Pushout Pressure: Lag Time: Rise: Antilock Brakes: Effectiveness: Pedal Ratio taken as 1. Due to Measurement of Pedal Force and Wheel Brake Torque Directly See White Paper HVE-WP-212-2 See White Paper HVE-WP-212-2 See White Paper HVE-WP-212-2 See White Paper HVE-WP-212-2 This value is assumed to be This value is assumed to be This value is assumed to be This value is assumed to be 5% for all vehicles. Same as EDC. Brake - Test Data Parameter Value Description Drag Torque: Brake Test Measure Wheel Drag Force Times the Rolling Radius Wheel Drag: Drag Force of Wheel Immediately Prior to Any Brake Application Max Brake Force: Maximum Wheel Force Value Recorded during Brake Test Max Pedal Force: Maximum Pedal Force Value Recorded during Brake Test 22 of 22