TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTS

Similar documents
Appendix B: Travel Demand Forecasts July 2017

TEXAS CITY PARK & RIDE RIDERSHIP ANALYSIS

Travel Forecasting Methodology

Edmonton Region Commodity Flow Study

Subarea Study. Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project. Final Version 1. Washington County.

The Boston South Station HSIPR Expansion Project Cost-Benefit Analysis. High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Technical Appendix

Travel Demand Modeling at NCTCOG

Appendix F Model Development Report

CITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6

UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018

CITY OF VANCOUVER ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT

BERKELEY DOWNTOWN AREA PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Executive Summary. Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Priority Corridor Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis October 13, 2009.

HALTON REGION SUB-MODEL

August 2, 2010 Public Meeting

DEVELOPMENT OF RIDERSHIP FORECASTS FOR THE SAN BERNARDINO INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT STUDY

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MAY 5, 2016

Economy. 38% of GDP in 1970; 33% of GDP in 1998 Most significant decline in Manufacturing 47% to 29%

GO Transit s deliverable: the 2020 Service Plan

CEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update

Letter EL652 City of Mercer Island. Page 1. No comments n/a

The City of Toronto s Transportation Strategy July 2007

The Engineering Department recommends Council receive this report for information.

SECTOR ASSESSMENT (SUMMARY): URBAN TRANSPORT

Mississauga Bus Rapid Transit Preliminary Design Project

Downtown Transit Connector. Making Transit Work for Rhode Island

Transportation Statistical Data Development Report BAY COUNTY 2035 LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN

ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

Findings from the Limassol SUMP study

Mountain Area Transportation Study Model Methodology and Assumptions Final

4 COSTS AND OPERATIONS

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017

2.4 TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION. Support the revitalization of urban cores STRATEGIC DIRECTION

Submission to Greater Cambridge City Deal

Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County Lee Gibson, Executive Director Roger Hanson, Senior Planner

CITY OF ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 301 E. Huron St., P.O. Box 8647 Ann Arbor, Michigan

Michigan/Grand River Avenue Transportation Study TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #18 PROJECTED CARBON DIOXIDE (CO 2 ) EMISSIONS

Welcome. Green Line in Your Community

Bi-County Transitway/ Bethesda Station Access Demand Analysis

Downtown Lee s Summit Parking Study

Sustainable Urban Transport Index (SUTI)

HRTPO Strategic Campaign. Passenger Rail. Agenda Item #11. Presentation To. May 19, Presentation By

Attachment C: Benefit-Cost Analysis Spreadsheet

Urban Transport systems in major cities in China. Sun Kechao Senior Engineer China Academy of Transportation Sciences, Beijing, China

Urban Land Use/Transport Policy, Metro and Its Impacts in Shanghai

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

ITEM 9 Information October 19, Briefing on the Performance Analysis of the Draft 2016 CLRP Amendment

METRO Orange Line BRT American Boulevard Station Options

CITY of GUELPH Transit Growth Strategy and Plan, Mobility Services Review. ECO Committee

We Want Your Input! Review the design alternatives and tell us what s important to you in the design of these areas of the approved BRT Network:

EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT

Decarbonization of the Transport Sector and Urban Form

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Parking Management Element

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

Needs and Community Characteristics

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

CLRP. Performance Analysis of The Draft 2014 CLRP. Long-Range Transportation Plan For the National Capital Region

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Policy Advisory Committee Meeting February 12, 2014

Back ground Founded in 1887, and has expanded rapidly Altitude about 2500 meters above MSL Now among the ten largest cities in Sub Saharan Africa

MERIVALE PRIORITY SQUARE 2852 MERIVALE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: ONT Inc. 25 Winding Way Nepean, Ontario K2C 3H1

Converting BRT to LRT in the Nation s Capital Ottawa, Canada. John Manconi City of Ottawa Ottawa, Canada

Road Map for Sustainable Transport Strategy for Colombo Metropolitan Region with Cleaner Air, through Experience

Parks and Transportation System Development Charge Methodology

UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference. October 18, 2010

UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference. October 18, 2010

Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration a Reality

6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

2.1 TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION. Expand regional rapid transit networks STRATEGIC DIRECTION

Transit Access Study

Green Line Long-Term Investments

Development of the Idaho Statewide Travel Demand Model Trip Matrices Using Cell Phone OD Data and Origin Destination Matrix Estimation

BENCHMARKING URBAN TRANSPORT-A STRATEGY TO FULFIL COMMUTER ASPIRATION

Back to the Future? Land Use, Mobility & Accessibility in Metropolitan China Day 23 C. Zegras. Contents

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study

I-405 and SR 522/NE 145th Bus Rapid Transit. Elected Leadership Groups Meeting November 30, 2018

AECOM 30 Leek Cres., 4 th Floor Richmond Hill, ON L4B 4N4 Canada

CITY OF ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 301 E. Huron St., P.O. Box 8647 Ann Arbor, Michigan

Mobile Area Transportation Study Urban Area and Planning Boundary

Iceland Information / latest news. High-quality transit system in Reykjavik Capital Area

Green Line LRT: Beltline Recommendation Frequently Asked Questions

Making Mobility Better, Together

Fresno County. Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) Public Workshop

V03. APTA Multimodal Operations Planning Workshop August Green Line LRT

2.1 Outline of Person Trip Survey

Task Force Meeting January 15, 2009

WESTSIDE SUBWAY EXTENSION. Final Smart Growth Evaluation Report

Preliminary Definition of Alternatives. 3.0 Preliminary Definition of Alternatives

Energy Technical Memorandum

3.1 Introduction Transportation Elements and Study Area Meeting the Need for the Project

Transit in Bay Area Blueprint

Denver Car Share Program 2017 Program Summary

Chapter 7: Travel Demand Analysis. Chapter 8. Plan Scenarios. LaSalle Community Center. Image Credit: Town of LaSalle

HIGHWAY 28 FUNCTIONAL DESIGN

8. TRIP DISTRIBUTION. 8.1 Trip Distribution by Trip Purpose. Figures 8.1 show desire lines by trip purpose. < To Work >

Kandy Transport Improvement Project (KTIP) Ministry of Defense & Urban Development

Public Transportation Problems and Solutions in the Historical Center of Quito

GTA A.M. PEAK MODEL. Documentation & Users' Guide. Version 4.0. Prepared by. Peter Dalton

Green Line LRT: Beltline Segment Update April 19, 2017

Transcription:

Jiangxi Ji an Sustainable Urban Transport Project (RRP PRC 45022) TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTS A. Introduction 1. The purpose of the travel demand forecasts is to assess the impact of the project components on the performance of the urban transport system in Ji an. The results of the analysis will provide the forecasts of future travel demand, travel patterns, transport system performance, and public transport ridership which will be used to assess the economic viability of each transport project component. The information from the travel model will be used for estimating travel time and vehicle operating cost savings, emissions, and traffic safety impacts. B. The scope of the analysis 2. The analysis area covers the existing Ji an Urban Center Area (JUCA) and its surrounding area (see Figure 1): (i) Jizhou District (ii) Qinyuan District (iii) Jingangshan Economic Development District (iv) Jiangshan New District (v) City West New District (vi) Southwest New District (vii) Binjiang New District 3. The project components included in the travel demand model are (see Figure 2): (i) (ii) Public transport component including an 6.9-km bus priority corridor with associated improvement of bus stop bays and waiting areas. Urban road development component with traffic management including five new arterial roads in the JUCA including improved traffic management measures and an advanced traffic monitoring and control system. 4. Traffic data on existing roads, socio-economic forecasts, urban development plans, and vehicle fleet forecasts were used to develop the travel demand model and to support scenario analysis (see Figure 3).

2 Figure 1: Analysis Area Figure 2: Project Components Figure 3: Technical Approach of the Analysis C. Data Collection and Forecasts 1. Socioeconomic and land use data 5. The current population, economic development and land use pattern are the fundamental factors which generate current travel demand. Those data have been collected for the base year to associate those data to the travel demand and patterns within the study area. The population in the study area has been growing 0.7% per annum during the last 7 years. According to the master plan for the area included in the travel demand model, the population in

3 2013 was 480,000 and expected to increase to 730,000 in 2020 and 1,040,000 in 2030. Future numbers of employees were also forecasted on the basis of population and land use plans. Table 1: Population of Various Residential Districts Residential District Year 2013 Year 2020 Year 2030 City North District 21,000 35,000 55,000 Central District 190,000 220,000 250,000 Houhe District 75,000 115,000 160,000 City West - 62,500 187,500 City East 42,000 47,500 60,000 Binjiang 21,000 60,000 80,000 Dunhou 99,000 135,000 160,000 JGS Economic Devel. Dist 17,000 55,000 87,500 Total 480,000 730,000 1,040,000 Figure 4: Population Growth Figure 5: Employment Growth 6. The current land use data and projections are shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6. Existing urban areas that have been substantially developed include: Jizhou District to the West of river, Qinyuan to the East and Jingangshan Economic development Zone to the South of existing city center. By 2020, the urban area is expected to expand in all directions from the city center.

4 Figure 6: Existing Urban Land Use Pattern Source: Ji an Municipal Government. Ji an Urban Master Plan (2007 2020). Figure 7: Planned Urban Land Use Plan (2020) 7. The annual growth rates of automobiles have been more than 30% for the last 10 years. As shown in Table 2, the number of automobiles is forecast to grow from 35,000 in 2013 to 109,500 in 2020, and to 187,000 in 2030. In 2030, vehicle ownership is expected to reach the level of 180 cars/1000 people. Table 2: Forecast Motorized Vehicle Fleet Sizes 2012 2020 2030 Number of Passenger Vehicles 35,519 109,500 187,200 Population (1000s) 48 73 104 Vehicles/1000 People 74 150 180 2. Traffic and travel data survey 8. A number of surveys were carried out to collect data for this study. The purposes of these surveys are to acquire necessary information on travel and traffic conditions on the road network and public transport system. The data collected in the surveys were used to calibrate or adjust the parameters of the travel demand model. These include:

5 Table 3: Traffic and Travel Survey Items Survey Type Details Road traffic volume count 33 road segments within the city center and 6 external highway study segments. classified vehicle count data (including bicycles and electric bicycles) 12-hour period from 07:00 to 19:00 major external highways connecting to Ji an Center City : routes G105, S318 (Ji an North Avenue), S224 (Ji an South Avenue) and S335 Bus routes on-board ridership survey Jingangshan avenue screenline bus passenger volume survey External transport terminal passenger survey passengers boarding and alighting at stops 12-hour period from 07:00 to 19:00 16 bus routes (out of 20 routes in operation) with daily ridership more than 500 passengers 7 locations along the BRT corridor 12-hour period from 07:00 to 19:00 Gender split of passengers Percentages of people picking up/dropping off passengers Split of Ji an residents and visitors Purpose split of the out of city trips Destinations of the out of city trips Mode use for visitor coming to Ji an Figure 8: Locations of Traffic Volume Count Survey Figure 9: Locations of screen-line bus passenger volume survey D. Travel Demand Model Development 1. 4-stage Modelling Process 9. The model used in this study is a traditional 4-step trip based model implemented in TransCAD. The model included the following four elements: (i) Trip generation estimating trips generated from/to each traffic zone (ii) Trip distribution estimating trips among and within traffic zones

6 (iii) (iv) Modal split estimating trips among traffic zones by various travel modes Traffic assignment assigning trips onto the transport network to estimate the traffic volume on the road network and public transport network 10. The model considers trips of following travel modes: (i) Non-motorized person trips walk, bicycle, moped, etc. (ii) Transit trips bus and BRT (iii) Personal motorized trips auto, motorcycle, etc. (iv) Trucks small trucks and large trucks 11. The model process basically generates a set of trip tables for various travel modes, which describe trips between individual traffic zone pairs. These trip tables are then assigned to the transport network to predict the vehicle volumes on the road network and passenger volumes on the transit network. The model can also estimate the service level (e.g., travel speeds, delay) on the transport system. 2. Network Building Figure 10: Four-stage Modelling Process 12. Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ). The study area is subdivided into 141 traffic analysis zones (TAZs) as shown in Figure 11. The TAZs were defined by dividing the administrative districts into zones which following certain physical or administrative boundaries, such as roads, rivers, street blocks, etc. The TAZs are the basic units upon which the travel demand is

7 estimated. In addition to the traffic zones, 8 external zones are defined in the model, representing the external highways connecting to the study area. Figure 11: Traffic Analysis Zones 13. The road network in the model study area is encoded in TransCAD. Figure 12 displays the Year 2013 model road network. The network consists of 790 nodes and 980 links, with a total length of 330 kilometers. The transit network includes all the bus lines operating in the model study area. In the Year 2013 model, 19 existing bus lines are encoded.

8 Figure 12: Year 2013 Urban Road Network Figure 13: 2012 Ji an Center City Bus Network 14. Model Validation and Adjustment. A set of preliminary base year trip tables was derived based on the model structure. The estimated trip tables are then used to adjust the coefficients and parameters of individual model elements. The estimated trip tables were validated by assigning the trip tables and compare the model assigned traffic volumes and ridership volumes on individual road segment or bus route segments with the observed volume data. Table 4 summarizes the comparison of model estimated and observed traffic volumes on the road network and while Table 5 summarizes the comparison of transit passenger volumes on the transit network respectively.

9 Table 4: Comparison of Observed and Estimated Screenline Vehicle Traffic Volumes Site No Obs.Daily Model Est. Obs. Daily Model Est. Site Volume Daily Vol. Volume Daily Vol. No 1 4,613 4,442 22 2,959 3,495 2 7,096 7,084 23 1,799 1,797 3 914 905 24 4,573 4,520 4 1,244 899 25 2,475 2,471 5 4,409 4,252 26 709 711 6 4,969 4,754 27 1,614 1,622 7 4,594 4,572 28 1,204 1,205 8 10,423 10,230 29 2,678 2,673 9 3,999 3,996 30 1,883 1,880 10 3,846 3,376 31 5,878 5,722 11 4,306 4,229 32 9,850 9,753 Site No Obs.Daily Volume Model Est. Daily Vol. Site No Obs. Daily Volume Model Est. Daily Vol. 12 2,685 2,691 33 5,693 4,448 14 4,551 4,590 34 6,270 6,231 15 9,895 9,688 35 3,341 3,346 16 3,856 3,165 36 1,479 1,478 17 182 184 37 2,164 2,164 18 9,925 9,384 38 3,549 3,546 19 331-39 2,672 2,670 20 1,153 1,115 40 3,354 3,354 21 3,073 3,405 Table 5: Comparison of Observed and Estimated Screen Line Passenger Volumes Model Est. Obs. Daily Model Est. Screen Obs. Daily Pax Screen line Daily Pax Pax Vol. Daily Pax Vol. line Vol. Vol. 1 8,023 8,178 6 2,285 2,331 2 6,906 7,953 7 13,173 12,164 3 8,087 8,261 8 9,315 9,134 4 19,251 18,191 9 8,529 7,819 5 9,025 8,315 15. Future networks were built according to the master plan. In 2030, the total roadway length of the road network will reach 1020 km. Figure 14 and Figure 15 display the year 2020 and year 2030 road networks respectively.

10 Figure 14: Year 2020 Road Network Plan Figure 15: Year 2030 Road Network Plan 16. Future bus routes and the BRT network were built to estimate the future public transport demand and BRT demand. Figure 16: Year 2030 Model Coded Transit Network Figure 17: Modelled BRT Route Network E. Travel Demand Forecasts 1. Regional Person Trips Forecasts 17. The total number of person trips generated by residents in the study area is forecast to increase from 1.27 million in 2013 to 2.76 million in 2030. With the development of outskirt areas, travel distance is expected to increase significantly and hence more trips will be made using motorized modes. As shown in Table 6, the non-motorized modal shares (i.e., walk and bicycle) are expected to decline from 82% in 2011 to 53% in 2030. The share of the auto mode

11 is expected to increase significantly, from 12% in 2011 to 24% in 2030. At present, the transit mode share, at 6% is expected to increase substantially with the expansion of the urbanized area and implementation of BRT. The transit share is forecast to reach 23% in year 2030. Table 6: Forecast Regional Person Trips and Modal Shares Index 2013 2018 2030 Total Daily Regional Trips (Millions) 1.27 1.94 2.76 Model Shares Walk 34% 30% 29% Bike/Moped 48% 34% 24% Car/Taxi 12% 21% 24% Transit 6% 15% 23% Note: The forecast bus shares are under the scenario without any premium bus service such as BRT. 18. In 2030, 550,000 motorized vehicle trips are forecast to be generated in the JUCA per day, an increase from 110,000 in 2013. The increase of passenger vehicle trips is likely to be dramatic, from 106,000 in 2011 to 520,000 in 2030. Table 7: Forecast Regional Vehicle Trips per Day 2013 2018 2030 Total Motorized Vehicle Trips (1000s)* 111.2 327.3 551.4 Total Passenger Vehicle Trips (1000s)* 106.0 307.8 519.9 * Excluding motorcycles or electric bikes. 2. Demand forecasts for ADB financed project components 19. Network Performance. Figures 18 and 19 display road network flow diagrams of the Build All scenarios for 2020 and 2030. Most of the road segments will be operated under capacity in 2020, except for few road segments in the city core and the three bridges crossing river. In 2030, there will be more road segments operating over capacity, for example, the two bridges and the roads on the west bank of the river in the center core area. For road segments in the City West District, where the ADB project roads are located, the projected traffic volumes in 2030 are moderate.

12 Figure 18: Year 2020 Build All Scenario Road Network Traffic Flow Figure 19: Year 2030 Build All Scenario Road Network Traffic Flow 20. Table 8 summarizes the performance statistics of the road network under the various scenarios for 2030. The forecasts indicate that the ADB road projects are expected to reduce the regional vehicle-kilometers by about 48,000 daily, and the regional vehicle-hours by about 3,700 daily by providing more direct connections by 2030. Table 8: 2030 Passenger Vehicle Operation Statistics under Various Scenarios No Build Build Yangming Build Junhua Build Yanming West Road Only Avenue only & Junhua Road Build All Passenger Car Veh-Km 5,205,534 5,190,264 5,189,847 5,170,061 5,170,214 Veh-Hr 153,377 151,882 152,085 150,468 150,264 Veh Trips (pcu) 605,516 605,516 605,516 605,516 605,516 Pax-Km 6,767,194 6,747,344 6,746,802 6,721,079 6,721,278 Pax-Hr 199,391 197,447 197,711 195,608 195,344 Person Trips 787,171 787,171 787,171 787,171 787,171 Moped/Motorcycle Veh-km 4,137,877 4,113,869 4,128,925 4,105,120 4,093,286 Veh-Hr 276,128 274,466 275,517 273,889 273,110 Veh Trips 693,591 693,591 693,591 693,591 693,591 Truck Veh-Km 602,635 601,241 601,322 599,878 599,685 Veh-Hr 15,575 15,514 15,524 15,473 15,463 Veh-Trips 62,399 62,399 62,399 62,399 62,399 Total Veh-Km 7,049,532 7,025,666 7,029,847 7,001,475 6,997,884 Veh-Hr 251,790 249,736 250,264 248,108 247,660 Veh-Trips (pcu) 875,992 875,992 875,992 875,992 875,992 21. Jingangshan Avenue BRT Ridership Forecasts. The transit networks used in the two forecast years (i.e., 2020 and 2030) were developed by expanding the existing transit service along with population growth and development patterns. The enhanced transit network was examined by the study team to determine if additional bus routes need to be added to cover the

13 new development areas. The service frequencies of new bus routes are set to 5 minutes for routes within the center city area and 10-20 minutes for routes serving the urban fringe areas. The base bus fare is kept the same price value as current year (i.e., to be adjusted following the CPI index). 22. The travel demand model was applied to forecast regional transit trip tables for scenarios without and with the BRT. Table 9 summarized the totals of regional transit trips under various scenarios. Under the no-brt condition, the total number of regional transit trips increase from 75,000 in 2013 to 290,000 in 2020, and further increase to 620,000 in 2030. With the planned expansion of the center city, more people will have to use transit for daily travel. With the implementation of the BRT system, the numbers of regional transit trips will increase, by about 7,000 in 2020 and 12,300 in 2030, reflecting that more people will use transit trips due to the service improvement. Table 9: Forecast Transit Trips under Various Scenarios Year/Scenario Total Transit Change from No- Trips BRT 2013 75,002 2020 No-BRT 288,975 2020 BRT 295,942 6,967 2030 No-BRT 621,759 2030 BRT 634,038 12,279 23. Figure 20 and Figure 21 illustrate the bus passenger flows of the regional transit network under the 2020 BRT and 2030 BRT scenarios. The figures reveal that while the BRT corridor is the major transit corridor with high passenger demand. In 2030, the transit passenger flow on major arterials connecting the new development areas will also be substantial, in particular on corridors connecting the Economic Development District to the south of the center city and the new areas west of the center city. Figure 20: Forecast Bus Passenger Flow under 2020 BRT Scenario Figure 21: Forecast Bus Passenger Flow under 2030 BRT Scenario

14 24. Table 10 summarizes the operating statistics of the transit service under the No-BRT and BRT scenarios. As shown in the table, with BRT operation, total numbers of system-wide passenger kilometers and passenger hours increase. This is due to the increase of total passenger trips (about 7,000 more daily in 2020 and 12,000 more in 2030). For the BRT routes, which would operate outside the BRT corridor for some part of the routes, the total number of passenger kilometers on these routes is about 979,000 in 2020, accounting for more than half of the system-wide passenger kilometers (1,653,000). On the other hand, the total number of vehicle kilometers of the BRT routes is about 25,000 in 2020, accounting for less than 30% of the number of system-wide vehicle kilometers. Table 10: Forecast Transit Ridership Statistics under Various Scenarios 2020 No BRT 2020 Build BRT 2030 No BRT 2030 Build BRT System-Wide Passenger Kilometers 1,561,846 1,653,762 4,243,876 4,405,155 Passenger Hours 91,173 91,537 243,800 243,421 Passenger Boardings 363,502 374,404 946,620 967,651 Passenger Trips 288,975 295,942 621,759 634,038 Vehicle Kilometers 88,235 88,235 151,937 151,937 Vehicle Hours 5,167 4,935 8,828 8,578 BRT Lines Passenger Kilometers 977,812 1,934,372 Passenger Hours 52,450 103,317 Passenger Boardings 166,124 316,930 Vehicle Kilometers 25,139 25,152 Vehicle Hours 1,343 1,344 BRT Corridor Passenger Kilometers 293,247 566,030 Passenger Boardings 81,782 154,410