TCD PFS Evaluation of Symbol Signs

Similar documents
Traffic Control Devices Pooled Fund Study

2003 EDITION. Illinois Supplement to the National Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Division of Highways

THE CITY OF MARION HISTORIC DOWNTOWN STREETSCAPE PLAN DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE

Virginia Department of Transportation

Fred H. Heery, Sr., P.E.

Role of Public Transportation and School Buses in the Resiliency of Rural Coastal Communities

An Evaluation on the Compliance to Safety Helmet Usage among Motorcyclists in Batu Pahat, Johor

SCHEDULE OF FINES & COSTS

FHWA Motorcycle Crash Causation Study

MICHIGAN TRAFFIC SAFETY MATERIALS CATALOG

Improving Rural Road Safety. National Conference of State Legislatures NCSL 2010 Legislative Summit Transportation Safety Committee July 26, 2010

Act 229 Evaluation Report

Traffic Safety Facts 2002

Work Zone Safety Best Practices Traffic Engineering & Safety Conference October 18, Dean Mentjes Federal Highway Administration

AFFECTED SECTIONS OF MUTCD: Section 2C.36 Advance Traffic Control Signs Table 2C-4. Guidelines for Advance Placement of Warning Signs

b. take a motorcycle-riding course taught by a certified instructor.

1st CDL TRAINING CENTER OF NOVA

Chapter 11 Sharing. the Roadway with Others. - Pedestrians - Bicycles and Motorcycles - Light trucks and small vehicles - Large Vehicles

Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan 2040

5 - TEAM VEHICLE RULES ~ 2018

Chapter 17 TRAFFIC AND VEHICLES. Adoption of Uniform Rules of the Road. Temporary Traffic Regulations.

TRAFFIC DEPARTMENT 404 EAST WASHINGTON BROWNSVILLE, TEXAS City of Brownsville Speed Hump Installation Policy

Implementation of Automatic Flagger Assistance Devices (AFADs) for Minnesota Department of Transportation Flagger Operations

Quick Facts General Statistics. Fatality Rate per 100,000 Population Source: FARS/Census

HD Truck Fuel Economy Task Group Key Issues for Phase 2 of EPA/NHTSA Rule Bill Van Amburg, CALSTART Leadership Circle Auburn Hills, MI June 5, 2013

Hardware-in-the-Loop Testing of Connected and Automated Vehicle Applications

NCUTCD Proposal for Changes to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

Motorcycling. New Zealand Household Travel Survey October 2015

Traffic Safety Facts 1995

COUNTERMEASURES THAT WORK:

Developing a Portable and Reliable Data Collection System for Evaluating Driver Behavior around Law Enforcement TRAVIS TERRY DR.

Section 6H.01 Typical Applications

WORK ZONE SAFETY TOOLBOX

Minnesota Mileage-Based User Fee Test Results. Ray Starr Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology Minnesota Department of Transportation

Memorandum Federal Highway Administration

Speed Evaluation Saw Mill Drive

TITLE 16. TRANSPORTATION CHAPTER 27. TRAFFIC REGULATIONS AND TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES

28, Approved and Ordered JAN!

Change to the Arlington County Code prohibiting the parking of commercial vehicles and recreational vehicles on residential streets

Plan Check Policies and Guidelines

County of Yuba Ordinance Requirements for Rural Fire Protection

Utilizing Crash Data Performance Metrics to Drive Improvement

TTI TRAFFIC SAFETY CONFERENCE. John A. Barton, P.E.

Stoughton Center Parking

VEHICLE NO.1- Your Vehicle. Began From. License Plate # (Street, Highway, Mile Marker, Terminal or Other Landmark) Near At VEHICLE NO.2.

CT6 SUPER CRUISE Convenience & Personalization Guide. cadillac.com

New York City Motorcycle Safety Study ALLEN MALLS: BEFORE, TEMPORARY MATERIALS, AFTER (CAPITAL): CHINATOWN (MANHATTAN)

Stop Sign Gap Assistance At Rural Expressway Intersections

Appendix 3. DRAFT Policy on Vehicle Activated Signs

TOWN OF LEICESTER COMMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS PARKING RULES & REGULATIONS

2 Min. Min. Edge of. Edgeline See Note 3 PLAN VIEW. See Note 3. This distance may vary

NIGHT DRIVING SAFETY FOR SCHOOL BUS DRIVERS

Chapter 12 VEHICLE SPOT SPEED STUDY

SEGMENT 2 DRIVER EDUCATION Risk Awareness

Created by: St. Louis County

Collect and analyze data on motorcycle crashes, injuries, and fatalities;

2005 Canadian Consumer Tire Attitude Study Highlights

Association between Commercial Vehicle Driver At-Fault Crashes and Proximity to Rest Areas and Truck Stops

Brownwood Portable Traffic Signals and AFADs Evaluation. Carl Johnson, P.E., TxDOT Brownwood District Melisa Finley, P.E., TTI

Plan Check Policies and Guidelines

o or Violating What They Capture?

School Bus Driver Inservice TITLE OF LESSON: RAIL GRADE CROSSINGS Objectives of Lesson: At the end of this lesson the student will:

Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Minnesota Speed Management Program

Bus Passenger Survey spring Centro authority area, and National Express (NX) routes within Centro

Motorcycle Drivers License Washington State Locations Tacoma

Identify the letter of the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question.

REPORT NUMBER: 120-MGA

Town of Centreville Automated Speed Enforcement Program

Example of a successful campaign in the Liszki District near Kraków

HEALTH GRADE 10 - DRIVER EDUCATION

GOVERNMENT OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ROAD LICENSING & SAFETY DIVISION 2001/2002 REGISTRAR S REPORT

540 CMR: REGISTRY OF MOTOR VEHICLES 540 CMR 22.00: MISCELLANEOUS MOTOR VEHICLE AND TRAILER EQUIPMENT AND OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS

City State Zip. Mistake 1 Mistake 2 Mistake 3 Mistake 4 Mistake 5. Mistake 6 Mistake 7 Mistake 8 Mistake 9 Mistake 10

TITLE VII: TRAFFIC CODE 70. GENERAL PROVISIONS 71. TRAFFIC REGULATIONS 72. STOPPING, STANDING, AND PARKING 74. PARKING SCHEDULES

Autonomous Driving, Tohoku University Sendai - Review of the Excursion

CT6 SUPER CRUISE Convenience & Personalization Guide. cadillac.com

D-25 Speed Advisory System

2014 Fall Asphalt Conference October 7, 2014 Richmond, VA Review of Virginia s 2013 Work Zone Crash Statistics

Traffic Engineering & Highway Safety Bulletin

2016 Car Tech Impact Study. January 2016

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Southern Windsor County 2016 Traffic Count Program Summary April 2017

CHAPTER 70: GENERAL PROVISIONS

REPORT NUMBER: 120-MGA

3. What is the most important aspect of social skills as a driver?

REGIONAL ROADEO WRITTEN TEST

Fresno County. Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) Public Workshop

Evaluation of type approval possibilities for AT Tyres

Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles

South Lexington Transportation Study Lexington, Massachusetts

VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

CHAPTER 71: TRAFFIC REGULATIONS

AAA ON THE ISSUES

Stakeholder Meeting: FMVSS Considerations for Automated Driving Systems

2016 State Roadeo Written Test. Name: District:

NCUTCD Proposal for Changes to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

Calvert County s Automated Speed Enforcement Program Frequently Asked Questions

TRAFFIC INFRACTIONS AND OTHER ORDINANCE VIOLATIONS. MUNICIPAL COURT FINE SCHEDULE Effective May 1, 2013

Activity-Travel Behavior Impacts of Driverless Cars

Transcription:

TCD PFS Evaluation of Symbol Signs Bryan Katz Gene Hawkins Jason Kennedy Outline Introduction Background Focus Groups and Expert Panel Comprehension and Legibility Distance Testing Recommendations and Conclusions Group Discussion Background Project chosen by TCD PFS in 2005 Replacement of current signs and creation of new signs for new services and technologies Most signs tested not in MUTCD Three tasks within research study Sign development Lit review Focus Groups Expert Panel Comprehension testing Legibility distance testing Background 10 different sign categories Type 3 Object Marker Wireless Internet Ferry Motorcycle Warning Rental Car Information School Bus Stop Truck Parking Photo Enforcement Truck Electrification

1 2 3 4 5 6 A B Object Marker Ferry Focus Groups C Rental Car D School Bus Stop Four focus groups conducted in Jan/Feb 2006 E F Photo Enforcement Wireless Internet Two in Falls Church, VA (Washington DC area) Highly populated with expansive highway system G H Motorcycle Warning Information Two in College Station, TX Less populated/college town with primarily rural highway system I Truck Parking J Truck Electrification Focus Groups Falls Church, VA Focus Group 1 Mid-day 6 Participants, 2 male and 4 female 1 motorcyclist (female) Focus Group 2 8 Participants, 5 male and 3 female 1 motorcyclist (male) Focus Groups College Station, TX Focus Group 3 Evening 9 Participants, 5 male and 4 female No motorcyclists Focus Group 4 9 Participants, 3 male and 6 female No motorcyclists

Focus Groups Focused Interviews with Truck Drivers Carmel Church, VA at a Flying J Truck Stop 10 Truck Drivers (9 Males, 1 Female) Truck Parking Symbol Truck Electrification Symbol Focus Groups Moderator initiated general discussion Elements of a good sign Sample of participants comments on beneficial sign element: Visibility Clear and unambiguous Color Consistent design Shape Size and style (font) of letters Procedure In-context photo + discussion, Example alternatives + more discussion Message clarity Consistency Noticeable/conspicuous Placement Considers driver expectancy In-Context Photo Wi-Fi, Truck Parking, Information Object Markers Alternatives

Expert Panel Ferry Panelists included engineers, human factors psychologists TCD PFS members FHWA Panel down-selected signs to help narrow down sign set for study Recommendations incorporated into creation of signs Object Marker Rental Car

School Bus Stop Ahead Automated Enforcement Wireless Internet Motorcycle Warning

Motorist Information Truck Parking Truck Stop Electrification Comprehension Research conducted at various locations Springfield Mall Fairfax County, VA McLean Community Center Fairfax County, VA New Kent County Rest Area New Kent, VA 174 Research Participants 21 commercial vehicle drivers (valid CDL) 18 and older Valid driver s license Survey featured 5 6 signs 10 15 minutes

Legibility Distance Laboratory study conducted in the FHWA SignSim 36 Symbol Signs 48 participants Ages 21 84 Half 75+ Legibility Distance Matching task Binder versus screen Participants responded same or different 100% correct for valid data Simulated distance Distances transformed from voltage output Average distance: 165 feet for all participants Relative distances between signs can be used to choices of preferred alternative Actual distance needs to be calibrated in the field Ferry Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Type 3 Object Marker Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Alternative 4 Alternative 5 Alternative 6 Mean Legibility Distance 121 116 123 Clearly Understood 60% 68% 72% Maybe Understood 4% 12% 4% Not Understood 36% 20% 24% High Water 0% 0% 8% Ferry 79% 79% 79% Car Trailers 17% 8% 8% Cruise Ship 0% 4% 4% Cargo Ship 4% 8% 0% Acceptable Users Cars 100% 96% 92% Trucks 24% 28% 84% Motorcycles 56% 44% 48% Passengers 48% 48% 40% Bicycles 40% 40% 24% Mean Legibility Distance 235 204 212 201 183 230 Clearly Understood 0% 4% 0% 0% 0% 4% Maybe Understood 24% 20% 8% 4% 16% 0% Not Understood 76% 76% 92% 96% 84% 96% Roadway Ends Ahead 16% 21% 17% 0% 29% 13% Hazardous Object 8% 25% 0% 0% 29% 8% Left Hand Curve 72% 46% 71% 96% 33% 79% Construction Ahead 4% 4% 0% 4% 4% 0% Pothole in Road 0% 4% 13% 0% 4% 0% Required Action Drive to Right of Sign 0% 4% 4% 0% 4% 8% Drive to Left of Sign 29% 24% 72% 79% 8% 68% Sign Gives No Direction 71% 72% 24% 21% 88% 24% Average Rating 1.58 2.96 4.00 4.65 2.23 3.03 Average Rating 4.85 5.17 5.23

Rental Car Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 School Bus Stop Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Alternative 4 Alternative 5 Mean Legibility Distance 201 186 157 Clearly Understood 20% 16% 20% Maybe Understood 0% 0% 0% Not Understood 80% 84% 80% Parking Lot Ahead 29% 35% 23% Reminder to Lock Car 29% 30% 18% Valet Parking 8% 13% 14% Rental Car 21% 17% 45% Locksmith 13% 4% 0% Mean Legibility Distance 212 142 205 202 168 Clearly Understood 84% 80% 76% 56% 76% Maybe Understood 12% 12% 12% 24% 16% Not Understood 4% 8% 12% 20% 8% School Crosswalk 0% 0% 5% 15% 5% School Bus Stop 90% 95% 95% 85% 95% Children at Play 5% 0% 0% 0% 0% School Zone Ahead 5% 5% 0% 0% 0% Average Rating 6.28 5.56 5.44 3.97 5.27 Average Rating 3.14 3.10 4.33 Photo Enforcement Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Wireless Internet Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Alternative 4 Mean Legibility Distance 188 234 165 Clearly Understood 72% 80% 92% Maybe Understood 20% 8% 0% Not Understood 8% 12% 8% Red Light Enforcement Cameras 83% 96% 92% Sun Glare 0% 0% 0% Traffic Signal Ahead 0% 0% 0% Scenic View Ahead 0% 0% 0% Speed Limit Enforced by Radar 4% 0% 0% Speeding Enforcement Cameras 13% 4% 8% Mean Legibility Distance 145 152 143 188 Clearly Understood 76% 52% 80% 16% Maybe Understood 8% 32% 4% 0% Not Understood 16% 16% 16% 84% Reduce Radio Noise 0% 4% 0% 5% Fallout Shelter 0% 0% 0% 0% Radio Tower 4% 4% 0% 38% Wireless Internet 96% 88% 96% 43% Satellite Radio 0% 4% 4% 14% Average Rating 4.75 5.20 4.81 2.60 Average Rating 6.15 5.49 4.09

Motorcycle Warning Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Alternative 4 Motorist Information Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Mean Legibility Distance 199 204 187 184 Clearly Understood 36% 40% 48% 36% Maybe Understood 8% 10% 36% 24% Not Understood 32% 20% 16% 40% Wear Helmet for Safety 0% 0% 4% 8% Motorcycle Warning 84% 83% 87% 75% Motorcycles Permitted 4% 9% 4% 8% Watch for Motorcyclists 12% 9% 4% 8% Motorcycle Parking Ahead 0% 0% 0% 0% Average Rating 4.99 4.78 5.19 5.42 Mean Legibility Distance 218 232 157 Clearly Understood 52% 60% 96% Maybe Understood 4% 8% 0% Not Understood 44% 32% 4% Use Caution 4% 0% 0% Wireless Internet Available 20% 0% 0% Medical Assistance 0% 8% 5% Traveler Information 76% 92% 95% Services Expected Maps Available 60% 84% 79% Brochures Available 80% 80% 75% Manned Booth During Business Hours 44% 64% 46% Manned Booth 24 Hours 28% 36% 25% Average Rating 4.85 5.17 5.23 Truck Parking Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Truck Electrification Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Mean Legibility Distance 150 175 220 Clearly Understood 84% 88% 68% Maybe Understood 8% 4% 24% Not Understood 8% 8% 8% Passing Trucks is Permitted 0% 4% 8% Heavy Truck Loads Permitted 0% 0% 4% Truck Parking 100% 96% 88% Weigh Station Ahead 0% 0% 0% Loading Zone 0% 0% 0% Vehicles Permitted Cars 4% 0% 13% Small Trucks 56% 64% 52% Tractor Trailers 76% 84% 96% Recreational Vehicles 32% 20% 24% Buses 40% 28% 32% Average Rating 5.21 5.61 3.27 Mean Legibility Distance 201 184 Clearly Understood 20% 32% Maybe Understood 36% 28% Not Understood 44% 40% Truck Parking for Electric Powered Trucks 17% 25% Truck Electrification Available 39% 29% Beware of Wires 0% 0% Truck Stop Ahead 4% 0% Truck Parking and Electric Vehicle Charging 39% 46% Average Rating 5.32 4.90

Ferry If only cars are permitted, alternative on left should be used If trucks are permitted, the alternative on the right should be used Object Marker None of the alternatives adequately show a hazard; however, the existing marker performed better than the others If direction element is required, then the alternative (right) was more clear to motorists Rental Car Rental car symbol with $ was most easily understood, but the meaning of the sign is still not clear to motorists Text may be a better option for this sign School Bus Stop Ahead If a symbol is desired, the School Bus Stop Ahead sign with the rear view of a school bus was clearly understood and had the best legibility distance of symbols

Automated Enforcement Camera symbol shown below as a separate plaque was easier to comprehend and had the best legibility distance Wireless Internet The wireless internet symbols shown below were easy to comprehend and had similar legibility distances Motorcycle Warning Old-fashioned style motorcycle symbol as a separate placard was similar to other alternatives for comprehension but had the best legibility distance Motorist Information? Mark had the best legibility distance but INFO had the best comprehension ratings i was not easily understood

Truck Parking Truck parking symbol alternative shown below was the easiest to comprehend and performed better in the legibility distance tests than an alternative with the P inside the symbol Truck Stop Electrification Neither symbol was understood (perhaps since concept is new) If symbol is chosen, alternative below performed the best in legibility testing Group Discussion Questions and Comments?