Customer Application Examples

Similar documents
AN OPTIMAL PROFILE AND LEAD MODIFICATION IN CYLINDRICAL GEAR TOOTH BY REDUCING THE LOAD DISTRIBUTION FACTOR

CHAPTER 5 PREVENTION OF TOOTH DAMAGE IN HELICAL GEAR BY PROFILE MODIFICATION

Model Library Power Transmission

SIMPACK WIND. What is SIMPACK? Applications: Highlights: Accurate Fast Robust Versatile. Application

KISSsoft 03/2017 Tutorial 15

SIMPACK WIND. What is SIMPACK? Applications: Highlights: Accurate Fast Robust Versatile. Application

EFFICIENZA E ANALISI TERMICA. Ing. Ivan Saltini Italy Country Manager

ANALYSIS OF GEAR QUALITY CRITERIA AND PERFORMANCE OF CURVED FACE WIDTH SPUR GEARS

ANALYSIS OF SURFACE CONTACT STRESS FOR A SPUR GEAR OF MATERIAL STEEL 15NI2CR1MO28

KISSsoft Tutorial 012: Sizing of a fine pitch Planetary Gear set. 1 Task. 2 Starting KISSsoft

Vibration Analysis of Gear Transmission System in Electric Vehicle

GEAR CONTENTS POWER TRANSMISSION GEAR TYPES OF GEARS NOMENCLATURE APPLICATIONS OF GEARS VELOCITY RATIO GEAR TRAINS EXAMPLE PROBLEMS AND QUESTIONS

KISSsoft 03/2013 Tutorial 15

How Multibody-System Simulation Models can Support the Design of Wind Turbines

KISSsys Application 008: Gearbox Concept Analysis

Cornering & Traction Test Rig MTS Flat-Trac IV CT plus

Methodology for Designing a Gearbox and its Analysis

KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING

RELIABILITY IMPROVEMENT OF ACCESSORY GEARBOX BEVEL DRIVES Kozharinov Egor* *CIAM

Gear Measurement. Lecture (7) Mechanical Measurements

Chapter 8 Kinematics of Gears

Design of Helical Gear and Analysis on Gear Tooth

Drivetrain Simulation and Load Determination using SIMPACK

Tooth thickness Dedendum. Addendum. Centre distance Nominal

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF SPUR GEAR USING FEM

CH#13 Gears-General. Drive and Driven Gears 3/13/2018

CASE STUDY OF ASSEMBLY ERRORS INFLUENCE ON STRESS DISTRIBUTION IN SPUR GEAR TRAIN

Gear Optimisation for Reduced Noise Levels

1.8 Rack shift of the gear


Multibody modelling of shuttling excitation in spur and helical geared transmissions

SECTION 4 SPUR GEAR CALCULATIONS

Analytical impact of the sliding friction on mesh stiffness of spur gear drives based on Ishikawa model

Gear Tooth Geometry - This is determined primarily by pitch, depth and pressure angle

PRECISION GROUND GEARS Spur & Helical Gears

Lecture (7) on. Gear Measurement. By Dr. Emad M. Saad. Industrial Engineering Dept. Faculty of Engineering. Fayoum University.

Figure 1.1 "Bevel and hypoid gears" "Modules" Figure / August 2011 Release 03/2011

Quindos the Ultimate Software package for Gears, Gear Tools and other Special Applications

ANALYSIS OF SPUR GEAR GEOMETRY AND STRENGTH WITH KISSSOFT SOFTWARE

EFFECT OF SURFACE ROUGHNESS ON PERFORMANCE OF WIND TURBINE

Analysis of Torsional Vibration in Elliptical Gears

SECTION 8 BEVEL GEARING

Vibration Measurement and Noise Control in Planetary Gear Train

Bevel Gears n A Textbook of Machine Design

Optimization of Design Based on Tip Radius and Tooth Width to Minimize the Stresses on the Spur Gear with FE Analysis.

Therefore, it is the general practice to test the tooth contact and backlash with a tester. Figure 19-5 shows the ideal contact for a worm gear mesh.

Use of Simpack at the DaimlerChrysler Commercial Vehicles Division

Chapter 1 Gear Design

VOLUME 9, FIRST ISSUE

MODELING SUSPENSION DAMPER MODULES USING LS-DYNA

Vibration Analysis of an All-Terrain Vehicle

MARINE FOUR-STROKE DIESEL ENGINE CRANKSHAFT MAIN BEARING OIL FILM LUBRICATION CHARACTERISTIC ANALYSIS

Spur gearing, Helical gearing [mm/iso] Pinion Gear ii Project information? i Calculation without errors.

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DESIGN OF SIMPLE SPUR GEAR TRAIN AND HELICAL GEAR TRAIN WITH A IDLER GEAR BY AGMA METHOD

Determination of the optimum flank line modifications for gear pairs and for planetary stages

1874. Effect predictions of star pinion geometry phase adjustments on dynamic load sharing behaviors of differential face gear trains

APPLICATION OF A NEW TYPE OF AERODYNAMIC TILTING PAD JOURNAL BEARING IN POWER GYROSCOPE

GatesFacts Technical Information Library Gates Compass Power Transmission CD-ROM version 1.2 The Gates Rubber Company Denver, Colorado USA

Chapter 3. Transmission Components

Gear Shift Quality Improvement In Manual Transmissions Using Dynamic Modelling

2. Write the expression for estimation of the natural frequency of free torsional vibration of a shaft. (N/D 15)

UNIT -I. Ans: They are specified by the no. of strands & the no. of wires in each strand.

Analysis and control of vehicle steering wheel angular vibrations

A comparison of the gear calculation process according to Swedish and American textbooks for higher education

Static And Modal Analysis of Tractor Power Take Off (PTO) Gearbox Housing

Friction Calculation and Simulation of Column Electric Power Steering System

SPMM OUTLINE SPECIFICATION - SP20016 issue 2 WHAT IS THE SPMM 5000?

10.2 Calculation for Bevel gear strength

Instantaneous Centre Method

Thermal Analysis of Helical and Spiral Gear Train

CHAPTER 1 BALANCING BALANCING OF ROTATING MASSES

GEARING. Theory of. Stephen. Kinetics, Geometry, and Synthesis. P. Radzevich. /Ov CRC Press yc*** J Taylor& Francis Croup Boca Raton

Multibody Dynamics Simulations with Abaqus from SIMULIA

ScienceDirect A NEW EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH TO TEST OPEN GEARS FOR WINCH DRUMS

Influential Criteria on the Optimization of a Gearbox, with Application to an Automatic Transmission

Optimum combined pitch and trailing edge flap control

INCREASE IN FATIGUE LIFE OF SPUR GEAR BY INTRODUCING CIRCULAR STRESS RELIEVING FEATURE

ME6601 DESIGN OF TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS

QUIET-TRACK: Track optimisation and monitoring for further noise reduction

SPMM OUTLINE SPECIFICATION - SP20016 issue 2 WHAT IS THE SPMM 5000?

Chapter 2 Dynamic Analysis of a Heavy Vehicle Using Lumped Parameter Model

Introduction. Kinematics and Dynamics of Machines. Involute profile. 7. Gears

Selection criteria of the addendum modification coefficients of spur gear pairs with smaller number of pinion teeth

Code No: R Set No. 1

Design Calculation and Verification using SIMPACK Wheel/Rail

1.7 Backlash. Summary of the backlash is play or clearance between one pair of gear. Fig. 17 Backlash

Prediction of Dynamic Factors for Helical Gears in a High-Speed Multibody Gearbox System

The Effect of Friction between a Cylindrical Guide and Magnetic Tape on Lateral Tape Motion

A Method to Define Profile Modification of Spur Gear and Minimize the Transmission Error

Ball Screw General Catalog

Forced vibration frequency response for a permanent magnetic planetary gear

SYNTHESIS AND ANALYSIS OF PLASTIC CURVED FACEWIDTH SPUR GEARS

Studying the Positioning Accuracy

Effect of Coefficient of Asymmetry on Strength and Contact Ratio of Asymmetric Helical Gear

Modeling of Torque Vectoring Drives for Electric Vehicles: a Case Study

Typical Stress & Deflection Analysis of Spur Gear in Spur Gear Assembly

An algorithm for robust gear modifications design

The Geometry of Involute Gears

Multi-body Dynamical Modeling and Co-simulation of Active front Steering Vehicle

ME scope Application Note 29 FEA Model Updating of an Aluminum Plate

Transcription:

Customer Application Examples The New, Powerful Gearwheel Module 1 SIMPACK Usermeeting 2006 Baden-Baden 21. 22. March 2006 The New, Powerful Gearwheel Module L. Mauer INTEC GmbH Wessling

Customer Application Examples 2 The New, Powerful Gearwheel Module L. Mauer, INTEC GmbH Outline Method of Multy Body System Dynamics Contact modelling for the gearwheel element Application examples of powertrain systems - gear trains in combustion engines - Drive train with a planetary gears and two spur gear stages in wind energy machines

MBS-Characteristics Customer Application Examples 3 Characteristics of Multy Body Systems (MBS) mechanical system, containing: rigid and flexible bodies non-linear kinematic Joints moved reference systems massless force elements with flexibility and/or damping, also with states describing dynamic eigen-behaviour closing loop constraints - formulation in relative coordinates - contact point to curve - contact point to surface - planar contact curve to curve - 3D contact surface to surface applied forces depending on constraint forces (friction forces) actuators and sensors p& = T( p) v M( p) v& = f ( p, v, c, s, u, λ) G c& = f c ( p, v, c, s, u, λ) 0 = g( p, s, u) dg G( p, u) = dp T ( p, s, u) λ

Force Customer Element Application Gear Wheel Examples 4 Force Element Gear Wheel - evolute tooth profile - spur gears and helical gears - external and internal - toothing - profile shift - profile modification (tip relief) - backlash - parabolic function of the single tooth pair contact stiffness - fluctuation of the total meshing stiffness - dynamic change in axle distance - dynamic change in axial direction - visualisation of the meshing forces in the components x, y, and z

Force Customer Element Application Gear Wheel Examples 5 Geometrical input parameters for tooth gear primitives - flag for setting external or internal gearwheels - number of teeth - normal module - normal angle of attack - addendum and dedendum height - helix angle - bevel angle - profile shift factor - backlash or backlash factor -face width - discretisation of the graphical representation - initial rotation angle of the toothing

Force Customer Element Application Gear Wheel Examples 6 Definition gearwheel force element stiffness model - linear / non-linear damping model - linear / non-linear friction model - non / coulombic tip relief factor shape factor material properties - Young modulus, Poisson ratio damping parameters

Calculation Customer of Application the Contact Examples Stiffness 7 Calculation of the contact stiffness calculation of the nominal contact stiffness according to DIN 3990 parabolic function for the contact stiffness Parameter: Stiffness Ratio super positioning of the tooth pairing forces considering Tip Relief flank backlash is depending on the actual centre distance if the actual backlash becomes negative, double sided flank contact will be considered

Calculation Customer of Application the Contact Examples Stiffness 8 Calculation of the theoretical contact stiffness of a single tooth pair in accordance to DIN 3990 q = C 2 1 + C2 zn 1 + C3 / zn2 + C4x1 + C5x1 / zn 1 + C6x2 + C7x2 / zn2 + C8x1 + / C x 9 2 2 z n1 z n2 x 1 number of teeth gear 1 number of teeth gear 2 profile shift factor gear 1 z n 1 z cos 1 3 β x 2 profile shift factor gear 2 C 1 C 2 C 3 C 4 C 5 C 6 C 7 C 8 C 9 0.04723 0.15551 0.25791-0.00635-0.11654-0.00193-0.24188 0.00529 0.00182 1 c th = q theoretical tooth pairing stiffness [N/(mm µm)]

Calculation Customer of Application the Contact Examples Stiffness 9 Calculation of the nominal contact stiffness for the single toot pairing in accordance to DIN 3990 c = cth CM CR CB cos β c th C M C R C B β theoretical contact stiffness [N/(mm µm)] correction factor [-] standard value: shape factor [-] for solid gears: C M C R = 0.8 =1.0 reference profile factor against norm reference profile [-] helix angle standard value for the nominal contact stiffness (Niemann/Winter, Maschinenelemente II) c =14 [N/(mm µm)]

Calculation Customer of Application the Contact Examples Stiffness 10 Gearwheel shape factor C R Source: Niemann/Winter: Maschinenelemente Reference profile factor C B C B { ( * )} { ( o 1+ 0.5 1.2 h / m 1 0.02 α )} = 20 f n n where the standard reference profile is defined with the following properties: dedendum height factor * =1.2 h f angle of attack α n = 20 [deg]

Calculation Customer of Application the Contact Examples Stiffness 11 Parabolic function of the stiffness for a single tooth pair contact defined with the stiffness ratio S R where: S R = c c min max c = c max 2,0 1,8 1,6 S R = 0.80 c min stiffness function = c S R ( 2 1 (1 S ) ) c( ς ) c ς = R mesh stiffness 1,4 1,2 1,0 0,8 0,6 0,4 0,2 0,0 0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5 3,0 3,5 4,0 angle of rotation

Contact Customer Stiffness Application depending Examples on Tip Relief 12 Using tip relief factor for modification of the total mesh stiffness function example spur gear: ε α =1.3 75 % tip relief T R = 0.75 S R =1.0 S R = 0.8 Total mesh stiffness function Total mesh stiffness function 2,0 2,0 1,8 1,8 1,6 1,6 1,4 1,4 mesh stiffness 1,2 1,0 0,8 mesh stiffness 1,2 1,0 0,8 0,6 0,6 0,4 0,4 0,2 0,2 0,0 0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5 3,0 3,5 4,0 0,0 0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5 3,0 3,5 4,0 angle of rotation angle of rotation

Finding Customer the Contact Application Points Examples 13 Special hints for modelling of spur gears Why tip relief should be used Without use of tip relief, each new tooth pair which is coming into contact, invokes a jump in the normal contact forces mesh stiffness Total mesh stiffness function 2,0 1,8 1,6 1,4 1,2 1,0 0,8 0,6 0,4 0,2 0,0 0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5 3,0 3,5 4,0 angle of rotation Total mesh stiffness function If we would like to deal with this jumps, we must set Root functions for the gearwheel Use of tip relief involves an smooth steadily beginning of the contact forces For spur gears a minimum tip relief factor of 0.1 is recommended mesh stiffness 2,0 1,8 1,6 1,4 1,2 1,0 0,8 0,6 0,4 0,2 0,0 0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5 3,0 3,5 4,0 angle of rotation Total mesh stiffness function 2,0 1,8 Linear contact stiffness relations are given for S R =1.0 T R = 1.00 mesh stiffness 1,6 1,4 1,2 1,0 0,8 0,6 0,4 0,2 0,0 0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5 3,0 3,5 4,0 angle of rotation

Calculation Customer of Application the Contact Examples Stiffness 14 Helix gears, function of the contact stiffness The contact stiffness function of helix gears depends on the helix overlap ratio ε β = β b sin m π n Using the function of the tooth pairing stiffness for spur gears, ( 2 1 (1 S ) ) c( ς ) c ς = R ε β the pairing stiffness function for helical gears may found as an integral of this function. The mean axial position of the resulting stiffness function depends also on the scaled angel of rotation ς

Contact Customer Stiffness Application depending Examples on overlap ratio 15 Helix gears, influence of the overlap ratio overlap ratio ε β β b sin m π = Example: contact ratio n ε α = 1.3 ε β = 0.85 S R =1.0 S R = 0.8 Total mesh stiffness function Total mesh stiffness function 2,0 2,0 1,8 1,8 1,6 1,6 1,4 1,4 mesh stiffness 1,2 1,0 0,8 mesh stiffness 1,2 1,0 0,8 0,6 0,6 0,4 0,4 0,2 0,2 0,0 0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5 3,0 3,5 4,0 0,0 0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5 3,0 3,5 4,0 angle of rotation angle of rotation

Finding Customer the Contact Application Points Examples 16 What is the best Overlap Ratio? The function of the total mesh stiffness depends on the overlap ratio strongly: sharp upper edges for sharp lower edges for constant function for where ε β = ε α 1+ n ε β = 2 εα + n ε β =1+ n n = 0,1, K, m Overlap ratio epsilon_beta 4 3,5 3 2,5 2 1,5 1 0,5 0 teeth stiffness variation 1 1,1 1,2 1,3 1,4 1,5 1,6 1,7 1,8 1,9 2 contact ratio epsilon_alpha

Finding Customer the Contact Application Points Examples 17 Dynamic input to the force element gear wheel rotational angle of both gears rotational velocities actual centre distance relative axial displacement (important for bevel gears) Finding the locations of flank contact the analytical determination of the contact point locations makes the numerical time integration fast, robust and reliable no discretisation errors

Contact Customer Force Application CalculationExamples 18 Impacts in tooth contact All tooth contacts are modelled as one side acting springs. The impact forces are depending on the amount of flexible penetration. F n s

Contact Customer Force Application CalculationExamples 19 Damping during tooth contact in normal direction - viscous damping linear d in damping constant for compression d out damping constant for decompression s 0 value of flexible penetration, where the full damping acts d(s) [Ns/m] d in d out 0 0 s 0 s [m]

Contact Customer Force Application CalculationExamples 20 Damping during tooth contact in tangential direction - Coulombic friction v t tangential velocity v eps Coulomb transition velocity µ coefficient of friction Ft µ F n 1 v eps 1 v t

Contact Customer Force Application Visualisation Examples 21 Animation of simulation results The tooth contact forces may be represented in the animation of the MBS as scaled arrows in the following three components: - circumferential force -radial force - axial force Example: External pair of spur gears. Both gears are kinematical driven by a transmission ratio which is not exactly the ratio of the teeth numbers

Steady Customer State Force Application Response Examples 22 Non-linear effect of gear pairings in the presence of backlash V Tooth gear pairings having backlash represents an oscillator with an under-linear stiffness function. 0 1 Ω/ω 0 Literatur: G. W. Blankenship, A. Kahrman: Steady State Forces Response of a Mechanical Oscillator with Combined Parametric Excitation and Clearance Type Non-Linearity. Journal of Sound and Vibration (1995) 185(5), 743-765

Steady Customer State Force Application Response Examples Frequenz-Sweep upwards green, downwards red 23

Application Customer Example Application Timing Examples Mechanism 24 Timing mechanism using gear trains given problem - high number of revolutions - high dynamic loads why gearwheels instead of chains gear trains are stable for highest numbers of revolution simulation technique - Tooth meshing frequencies with more than 5000 Hz have to be processed. - All tooth meshing interactions have to be described with the proper phase relations.

Application Customer Example Application Wind Examples Turbine Wind turbine plant, total system models - flexible components (tower, rotor blades, machine frame) - detailed dynamic model of the power train including all gear stages, flexible axle couplings, brake and generator 25

Application Customer Example Application Wind Examples Turbine Wind turbine plant, total system models - generator controller and grid coupling (User fct., embedded DLL, or Matlab/Simulink s-function) - Aero dynamic force calculation using blade element-theory (e.g. AeroDyn) - active control of the blade pitch angle (e.g. co-simulation together with Matlab/Simulink) 26

Conclusion Customer Application Examples 27 Conclusion recursive order(n) algorithm in relative coordinates analytical description of the tooth profile geometry set of minimal coordinates no discretisation errors no iterative algorithms consideration of changes in centre distance and in axial movement of the gears Parameterisation of the function of mesh stiffness contact force calculation for each individual toot contact easy fit to static FEA complete coupling of drive train models within the three dimensional MBS - flexible bearing of the gear shafts - resilient moment strut mount - investigation of the overall system dynamics modellisation in substructure technique complete parameterisation of the models use of solvers working without numerical damping efficient solver technology wide reaching industrial application experience analysis of sub models easy change of model properties reliable simulation results MBS-models > 1000 states high process reliability.