T TTTTTTTTTTT T T TTT TTTT T & T TTTTT December 7, 2017

Similar documents
Minnesota Autonomous Shuttle. NACV Summit June 12, 2018

Minnesota Autonomous Bus Pilot Industry Forum Webinar. April 20, 2017

ALASKA FORUM ON AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES

Draft Results and Open House

Draft Results and Recommendations

Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study

Mississauga Moves: A City in Transformation icity Symposium Hamish Campbell

Future Vehicle Safety: Connected, Cooperative, or Autonomous? Christopher Poe, Ph.D., P.E. Assistant Agency Director

Convergence: Connected and Automated Mobility

The Smart Cities Challenge & The Aftermath

Connected Vehicles for Safety

The Future of Transit and Autonomous Vehicle Technology. APTA Emerging Leaders Program May 2018

CONNECTED AND AUTOMATED TRANSPORTATION AND THE TEXAS AV PROVING GROUNDS PARTNERSHIP

July 24, Rhode Island Transportation Innovation Partnership AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE MOBILITY CHALLENGE

AUTOMATED VEHICLES AND TRANSIT

Autonomous Vehicles in California. Bernard C. Soriano, Ph.D. Deputy Director, California DMV

Copyright 2016 by Innoviz All rights reserved. Innoviz

Connected and Automated Vehicle Program Plan. Dean H. Gustafson, PE, PTOE VDOT Statewide Operations Engineer February 10, 2016

AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES AND TRANSIT S LAST MILE

Ensuring the safety of automated vehicles

2/1/2018. February 1, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

CONNECTED AND AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES TYLER SVITAK CONNECTED AND AUTONOMOUS TECH PROGRAM MANAGER CDOT INTELLIGENT TRANPSORTATION SYSTEMS (ITS)

US DOE Community Partner Projects: U.S. Fuels Across America's Highways -- Michigan to Montana (M2M)

Low-Speed Autonomous Shuttle Project Summary

Automated Commercial Motor Vehicles: Potential Driver and Vehicle Safety Impacts

The Autonomous Transportation Journey

Rocky Mountain. Corridor Input Team. Alternatives Overview. TEMS, Inc. / Quandel Consultants, LLC TEMS, Inc. / Quandel Consultants, LLC

Zero Emission Bus Deployment Best Practices and Lessons Learned from Around the World

Railyard Alternatives & I-280 Boulevard Feasibility Study 1 RAILYARD ALTERNATIVES & I-280 BOULEVARD (RAB) FEASIBILITY STUDY

Glendale Water & Power Smart Grid Project

DFW HSR Station Plans People Movers Hyperloop

SamTrans Business Plan Update May 2018

FUTURE OF MOBILITY. ACEC-PEPP Capital Improvements Design & Construction Seminar. Art Reinhardt, PE, CFM JANUARY 25, 2019

Partial Automation for Truck Platooning

April 2010 April 2010 Presented by Alan Eirls

AVs in BOSTON Shared rides, Seagulls, & Streets. Kris Carter Mayor s Office of New Urban Mechanics City of Boston

April 2011 April 2011 Presented by Robert Spaulding & Alan Eirls

Utah Transit Authority Rideshare. CTAA Conference June 12, 2014

3/16/2016. How Our Cities Can Plan for Driverless Cars April 2016

FasTracks News. RTD s Eagle P3 Transit Project Nears Halfway Mark to Opening Day EP3 will add three commuter rail lines to metro area in 2016

Foothill Transit Battery Electric Bus Performance Results

RESIDENTIAL WASTE HAULING ASSESSMENT SERVICES. January 10, 2011 Presentation to Arvada City Council

An Introduction to Automated Vehicles

HDR Engineering. HART North / South. Tampa Bay Applications Group Meeting May 14, 2009

TRAFFIC DEPARTMENT 404 EAST WASHINGTON BROWNSVILLE, TEXAS City of Brownsville Speed Hump Installation Policy

12/5/2018 DRAFT. December 6, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

I-35W Past, Present, and Future: METRO Orange Line

Harlem Avenue between 63 rd and 65 th

Autonomous Urban Mobility

Autonomous Vehicles: Status, Trends and the Large Impact on Commuting

Amman Green Policies Projects and Challenges. Prepared by: Eng. Sajeda Alnsour Project coordinator Sept. 20, 2017

COMMISSION WORKSHOP Tuesday, May 12, :00 a.m. 12:00 p.m.

CityMobil2 : La Rochelle s demo : first results. Viajeo Plus Tuesday 30 June 2015

8/18/2014. Peoria Station Meeting. August 14, Project Update. Tina Jaquez RTD Aurora Line/I-225 Rail Public Information Manager

Accelerating the Future of Transportation

Singapore Autonomous Vehicle Initiative (SAVI)

TRAFFIC CONTROL. in a Connected Vehicle World

C H A P T E R S E V E N

12/10/2018. December 6, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

State Avenue Corridor Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)

TRANSPORTATION TRANSFORMATION

Autonomous Automated and Connected Vehicles

CUTRIC National Smart Vehicle Demonstration Project

AUTONOMOUS TRANSPORT. Investment Opportunity Brief

Dallas Integrated Corridor Management System Lessons Learned. June 2, 2014

A Vision for Highway Automation

(Type) Approval. Future and Current Developments INTRODUCTION. Partner in Mobiliteit. 4 july 2018

Changing Behavior and Achieving Mode Shi2 Goals

Testing Automated Collision Avoidance Systems for Transit Buses

Disruptive Technology and Mobility Change

Wheat Marketing Situation

Beyond the Pilot Depot Considerations for a Transition to 100% ZEB Fleet

CTfastrak Expansion. Stakeholder Meeting #4 Manchester Town Hall June 3, 2016

National Guidelines for Automated Vehicle Trials. RAC s Response to the National Transport Commission s Discussion Paper

6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Track: Data and Innovation

Beth Kigel. Florida Transportation Commissioner. Florida s Smart Future: Innovation in Policy and Technology Planning

Mobilehome Park Utility Upgrade Program

The Role of Infrastructure Connected to Cars & Autonomous Driving INFRAMIX PROJECT

Regional Transportation District. Dave Genova Interim General Manager and CEO August 21, 2015

Achieving Complete Vehicle Autonomy - Getting to Level 5?

Troost Corridor Transit Study

Automated Vehicles AOP-02

Regulation Update. Operating Committee September 12, PJM 2017

An Asset Management Plan for Transit And Access Transit Fleet

Increasing Nighttime Seatbelt Usage Rates: An Evaluation of Enforcement, Education, and Outreach Strategies

Development of California Regulations for the Testing and Operation of Automated Vehicles on Public Roads

Our Shared Autonomous Future. Thomas Fisher Director, Minnesota Design Center University of Minnesota

Intelligent Vehicle Systems

Preston s Edmond Market Report

NHTSA Role in The Future of Automated Vehicles

Public Meeting. City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development

Transitioning to a Zero-Emission Fleet: King County Metro Transit

Stop Sign Gap Assistance At Rural Expressway Intersections

Tennessee (TCA , et seq.) Electric Bicycle Class 1 Electric Bicycle Class 2 Electric Bicycle Class 3 Electric Bicycle

A GENERIC FRAMEWORK FOR HAZARD ANALYSIS OF AUTOMATED VEHICLES IN TRANSIT SERVICE

Elected Officials Briefing. North Metro Rail Line Update. February 9, 2017

Signs Five Man Electrical Jam

Westchester County Department of Public Works and Transportation First and Last Mile Connections TNC Partnership Study

Welcome. Green Line in Your Community

Transcription:

Transportation E ngineering & S afety December 7, 2017

Q & A 2

MN Autonomous Bus Team Leadership Jay Hietpas, MnDOT Project Director Jay.Hietpas@state.mn.us Mike Kronzer, MnDOT Project Manager Michael.Kronzer@state.mn.us Dick Wolsfeld, AECOM Principal-in-Charge Richard.Wolsfeld@aecom.com Daryl Taavola, AECOM Project Manager Daryl.Taavola@aecom.com Kian Sabeti, WSB Contract Manager KSabeti@wsbeng.com Janelle Borgen, WSB Project Lead JBorgen@wsbeng.com 3

W hy is A V testing im portantto M innesota? Im pacts to O perations/ G eom etrics, S igns, P avem entm arkings, C V Licensing, Insurance, Truck P latooning, D eliveries 4

W hatare the C hallenges? 5

D efine projectpilot, perform feasibility study, 6

M innesota & A utom ated V ehicles MN is A V /C V C om m ittee S tatutes/r ules ID S tatutes/r ules Lim iting A V s S tatutes / R ules 7

W hy are w e doing this? SNOW & ICE OPERATIONS MOBILITY INFRASTRUCTURE INFLUENCE PARTNERSHIPS Prepare autonomous vehicle industry for snow & ice conditions Identify challenges and strategies for safe operation of third party autonomous vehicles on MnDOT's transportation system Prepare for improved mobility services through autonomous vehicles Identify the infrastructure that is needed to ensure safe operation of autonomous vehicles Increase Minnesota's visibility and influence on advancing autonomous & connected vehicles Enhance partnerships between government and the autonomous vehicle industry 8

W hatare w e doing? 1 2 3 Assess AV Technology Develop Project Site Location Plan Establish Project Requirements 6 5 4 Prepare for Test Finalize Pilot Site Requirements Select Technology Vendor 7 8 Perform Live Test Evaluate Lessons Learned Project Status preparing fortesting / tours atm nr O A D 9

W hen w illthis happen? Phase I Phase II Develop Pilot Requirements (Spring 2017) Select Vendor (Summer/Fall 2017) Controlled Test: MnROAD + Super Bowl Showcase (Winter 2017-2018) Phase III (Optional) Future Phase IV Public Roadway / BRT Test(s) 2018 Area Transit System Deployment(s) (TBD) Testing Schedule allows for testing during winter 2017-2018 10

Industry / S takeholderinterest Company Navya EasyMile Local Motors 2getthere Autonomous Solutions Inc. (ASI) Romaric Corporation Velodyne Lidar New Flyer Industries Gillig Hyundai-Kia America Technical Center, Inc. (HATCI) SB Drive Yutong Proterra DOTs Colorado, Connecticut Transit Agencies RTD (Denver), MVTA & DTA (MN) April 20 Industry Forum Vendor / Stakeholder Outreach www.dot.state.mn.us/autonomous/ Bus / Retrofit Companies Autonomous Bus Vendors Public Agencies Other Mayo Clinic, FedEx, 3M, University of MN 11

June/July 2017 9 /15/17 12

14 C ountries, 4 C ontinents 160,000 P eople 60,000 M iles U.S. R oad Tour 13

EasyMile EZ10 Shuttle Criteria Easy Mile Size 13.13 Capacity 12 Speed Avg. 12-15 mph, up to 25 mph SAE Autonomy Level (0-5) 4 Federal Standards Have received exemptions Previous Demos Super Bowl Public Opportunity to Ride Work Plan Fixed Routes Prefer Private Roads Yes Includes Safety Assessments 14

SAE Level Level 0 Level 1 Level 2 Definition Human driver does everything Automated system on vehicle can sometimes assist the human driver conduct some parts of the driving task Automated system on the vehicle can actually conduct some parts of the driving task, while the human continues to monitor the driving environment and performs the rest of the driving task Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Automated system can both actually conduct some parts of the driving task and monitor the driving environment in some instances, but the human driver must be ready to take back control when the automated system requests Automated system can conduct the driving task and monitor the driving environment, and the human need not take back control, but the automated system can operate only in certain environments and under certain conditions Automated system can perform all driving tasks, under all conditions that a human driver could perform them 15

P rovided / operated by vendor 16

- MnROAD Twin Cities 17

High Volume I-94 Segment Low Volume Loop N - - Low and high speed testing available (30 7 0 M P H ) - C lo sed lo op = 2.5 m ile s; I-94 high speed segm ent= 3.0 m iles - E nabling environm ent, easily accessible and readily available - - 18

19

Testing S cenarios, S chedule & R esponsibilities - V arious Traffic, P avem ent, V isibility & Tem perature C onditions 20

21

O bservations / C onditions Dry Weather Winter / Cold Weather Snow / Ice / Salt Varying Visibility Various Lighting Obstacles On-coming Vehicles Slow / Stopped Vehicles Car Following Intersection Turns Stop / Yield Signs Traffic Signals Pedestrians Bicycles Right-of-Way Decisions Parking Transit Stops Pick-up/Drop-off Passengers Other Other Other 22

23

U.S. N ationalp artners A dvisor / testing participation 24

Future Phase O th e r S ite ( s ) 25

http://easymile.com/ 26

June - July 2017 Aug- Sept 2017 Oct - Dec 2017 Jan - Feb 2018 27

Q uestions & Thank You! Daryl Taavola, AECOM, Daryl.Taavola@aecom.com 28