TEXAS RURAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2035 (TRTP 2035)

Similar documents
NORTH HOUSTON HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (NHHIP): SEGMENT 3. April 19, 2018 NHHIP April 19, 2018

SH 249 IN GRIMES COUNTY. Open House April 3, 2014

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study

PORTS-TO-PLAINS. Corridor Planning. Ports-to-Plains Stakeholder Meeting

TXDOT PLANNING CONFERENCE. Quincy D. Allen, P.E. Houston District Engineer June 16, 2016

Mobility 2045 Plan Workshop

10/4/2016. October 6, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

METRO Orange Line BRT American Boulevard Station Options

Rocky Mount. Transportation Plan. Transportation Planning Division. Virginia Department of Transportation

SOUTHERN GATEWAY. Transportation and Trinity River Project Committee 11 May 2015

US 59 (SOUTHWEST FWY) IH 610 (West Loop) to SH 288 (South Fwy)

Broward County Intermodal Center And People Mover. AASHTO Value Engineering Conference Presentation. September 1, 2009 San Diego, CA

NORTH HOUSTON HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (NHHIP)

Help shape your community investment in Wake Transit. Fiscal Year 2019 Draft Work Plan Summary

I-405 and SR 522/NE 145th Bus Rapid Transit. Elected Leadership Groups Meeting November 30, 2018

CEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update

Proposed Project I 35 Improvements from SH 195 to I 10

Executive Summary. Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Priority Corridor Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis October 13, 2009.

Overview of Transit Funding and Planning in the PACTS Region

I-10 West AA/EIS Pre-Screening and Tier 1 Analysis Results. Public Meeting. Wulf Grote, Director Project Development Rick Pilgrim, Project Manager

2013/2014 Strategic Priorities Fund Application Overview

DRAFT Evaluation Scores. Transit

Utilizing GIS Models in Prioritizing and Selecting Transportation Projects

March 2, 2017 Integrating Transportation Planning, Project Development, and Project Programming

Welcome. Highway 23 Gap New London to Paynesville. Open House. - Please Sign In -

Transportation Sustainability Program

Travel Demand Modeling at NCTCOG

What We Heard Report - Metro Line NW LRT

Executive Summary October 2013

DOWNTOWN CONCORD SPECIFIC PLAN

Park & Ride Lot Investment Strategies

Technical Memorandum Analysis Procedures and Mobility Performance Measures 100 Most Congested Texas Road Sections What s New for 2015

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

GTA West Corridor Planning and EA Study Stage 1

FY 2017 ANNUAL PERFORMANCE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT

Leadership NC. November 8, 2018

Clearlake Road (State Road 501) Project Development & Environment (PD&E) Study

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

San Francisco Transportation Plan Update

Open House. Highway212. Meetings. Corridor Access Management, Safety & Phasing Plan. 5:30 to 6:30 p.m. - Southwest Corridor Transportation Coalition

Capital Metro Downtown Multimodal Station

August 2, 2010 Public Meeting

Bow-Concord Interstate 93 Transportation Planning Study

BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY

Annual Analysis of Progress on the Statewide Long-Range Transportation Plan Statewide Transportation Report

Municipal Road and Bridge Revolving Loan Fund Program Summary Rhode Island Department of Transportation

Green Line Long-Term Investments

WELCOME. Transit Options Amherst - Buffalo Public Workshops

Goods Movement Plans. Summary of Needs Assessments. January 21, 2015 GOODS MOVEMENT COLLABORATIVE AND GOODS MOVEMENT PLAN 6

The Georgia CMAQ Program. Practice Makes Perfect

SamTrans Business Plan Update May 2018

Exhibit A Sound Transit Board Resolution R Selecting the bicycle, pedestrian, and parking access improvements to be built for the Puyallup

Purpose and Need Report

2030 Multimodal Transportation Study

Fresno County. Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) Public Workshop

6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

January Final. Phase 2 Initial Screening Memorandum

Metro Green Line to LAX Alternatives Analysis. March 2012

I-26 Fixed Guideway Alternatives Analysis

Restoration of Historic Streetcar Services in Downtown Los Angeles

Needs and Community Characteristics

Dallas Integrated Corridor Management System Lessons Learned. June 2, 2014

I-820 (East) Project Description. Fort Worth District. Reconstruct Southern I-820/SH 121 Interchange

A Transit Plan for the Future. Draft Network Plan

TTI TRAFFIC SAFETY CONFERENCE. John A. Barton, P.E.

An Introduction to Automated Vehicles

Harlem Avenue between 63 rd and 65 th

Public Meeting. City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development

Point A Point B Point C Point D. Fulton County Board of Commissioners and Mayors Meeting December 14, 2017

Regional Transit Extension Studies. Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization Passenger Rail Task Force Meeting December 17, 2013

San Francisco to San Jose Preliminary Alternatives Analysis

CITY OF ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 301 E. Huron St., P.O. Box 8647 Ann Arbor, Michigan

I-26 Fixed Guideway Alternatives Analysis

MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 November 5, Transit Technologies

TxDOT TRAFFIC INCIDENT MANAGEMENT UPDATE. ITS Texas 2016

CTA Blue Line Study Area

Dixie Transportation Planning Office

Comprehensive Regional Goods Movement Plan and Implementation Strategy Goods Movement in the 2012 RTP/SCS

TRAFFIC SAFETY CONFERENCE. John A. Barton, P.E. Deputy Executive Director

ITEM 9 Information October 19, Briefing on the Performance Analysis of the Draft 2016 CLRP Amendment

Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

I-5 Electric Highway

Letter EL652 City of Mercer Island. Page 1. No comments n/a

Redefining Mobility Ready or not: Autonomous and connected vehicle planning and policy, now and in the future

Continued coordination and facilitation with City of Austin staff on documentation of processes to permit construction activities at the site.

Development of the Idaho Statewide Travel Demand Model Trip Matrices Using Cell Phone OD Data and Origin Destination Matrix Estimation

JCP&L Verbatim Response to Middletown Township s Questions

Planning for Tomorrow

Welcome. Public Open House Schedule. Super 8 West Kelowna 1655 Westgate Rd, West Kelowna. West Kelowna. Wednesday, March 2, :00 p.m. 8:00 p.m.

MPO Staff Report Technical Advisory Committee: July 12, 2017

Clifton Corridor Transit Initiative. Briefing to Medlock Area Neighborhood Association (MANA) February 15, 2016

Transportation 2040: Plan Performance. Transportation Policy Board September 14, 2017

The Engineering Department recommends Council receive this report for information.

Green Line LRT: Beltline Segment Update April 19, 2017

CONVERSION OF TWO-WAY FRONTAGE ROADS TO ONE-WAY

Washington State Road Usage Charge Assessment

Northeast Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Public Involvement Round 2 Input on Alternatives for Further Study

Welcome. Green Line in Your Community

Recent Transportation Projects

Transcription:

TEXAS RURAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2035 (TRTP 2035) Helping shape the future of rural Texas Texas Rural Transportation Plan 2035

Texas Rural Transportation Plan 2035 What is it? Component of the Statewide Long-Range Transportation Plan 2035 (SLRTP) Prioritization of non-mpo highway projects(20+ year planning horizon) Projects not in the Unified Transportation Program Rural (non-mpo) Areas only Considers needs of non-highway modes Developed with input from all stakeholders and system users of all modes What is the TRTP?

TRTP Objectives Develop a parallel process for long range planning in rural areas similar to MPOs Establish priorities for added-capacity highway projects not already in UTP To identify needs for non-highway modes To build on work completed on SLRTP 2035 What is the TRTP?

Planning and Programming Documents Texas Rural Transportation Plan (TRTP) What is the TRTP?

TRTP Study Area What is the TRTP?

Non-Highway Modes Non-highway modes include Railroads Transit Aviation Bicycles Walking Non-Highway Modes in the TRTP

Importance of Non-Highway Modes Non-highway modes are important to rural Texans Offer travel choices Provide links to local destinations Part of the multi-modal transportation system Non-highway modes are also essential for the Texas economy Provide alternative to road freight Offer connectivity to business hubs Support employment and job creation Non-Highway Modes in the TRTP

Challenges of Non-Highway Modes Non-highway modes present some planning challenges TxDOT does not directly operate railroads, transit systems, and airports TxDOT provides some, but not all, funding for nonhighway modes Non-highway modes do not adopt the same approach to long-range planning as for highways Non-Highway Modes in the TRTP

Opportunities of Non-Highway Modes However, non-highway modes present some opportunities Non-highway modes are part of a multi-modal transportation system, and may offer alternatives to highway investments A better understanding of all rural transportation needs will result in a more comprehensive TRTP Non-Highway Modes in the TRTP

TRTP and Non-Highway Modes For the non-highway modes, the TRTP will Identify rural transportation needs List known non-highway projects The TRTP will not Rank or prioritize projects for non-highway modes Non-Highway Modes in the TRTP

Non-Highway Mode Data Collection For the non-highway modes, data gathering approach Coordinate with TxDOT Divisions and other state agencies as appropriate Seek feedback from stakeholder meetings Contact non-highway operators and other stakeholders Independent research Non-Highway Modes in the TRTP

Highway Project Data Collection Collecting highway projects from TxDOT Sorting projects to identify appropriate projects Added capacity Capacity enhancements Will be reviewed by each TxDOT District office Select projects that will be ranked based on criteria Development of Highway Project Lists

Highway Project Lists Sources of Data DCIS TxDOT s project database Projects not in the current UTP Transportation Funding Brochures (Jan. 2011) Lists unfunded major projects One for each TxDOT District Corridor study recommendations My35 I-69 Ports-to-Plains Development of Highway Project Lists

Highway Projects Considered Added capacity Expanding 2 lanes to 4 lanes Capacity enhancements Super 2 Adding frontage roads 2-way left turn lanes Undivided to divided Development of Highway Project Lists

SLRTP Goals and TRTP Criteria TRTP criteria are based on two of the six goals: Mobility Connectivity Highway Project List Criteria

Highway Scoring Criteria - Connectivity Trunk System Defined network for rural connectivity System Gap Does the project fall between two segments of roadway with more lanes (a bottleneck)? Truck Freight Movement Dollars Tonnage Highway Project List Criteria

Highway Scoring Criteria - Connectivity Accessibility How does the project connect population and employment centers? Hurricane Evacuation Route (HER) Is the project on a designated HER or is it on a connector to an HER? Highway Project List Criteria

Highway Scoring Criteria - Mobility Cost Effectiveness How does construction cost compare to usage? Population Buffer How many people live in proximity to the project? Volume to Capacity Ratio Existing traffic on existing facility Future traffic on existing facility Future traffic on planned facility Highway Project List Criteria

Highway Scoring Criteria - Mobility Truck Traffic Existing truck percentage of total traffic Existing truck traffic Projected truck traffic Total Traffic What is current traffic volume? What is the future traffic volume? Safe Passing Needs Can you pass safely on the current highway? Highway Project List Criteria

Questionnaire Highway Project List Criteria

Top Rated Criteria Safe Passing Needs Score Frequency Forecast Truck Traffic Score Frequency 50 45 50 40 40 30 20 10 0 19 11 14 3 0 0 1 2 2 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 30 20 10 0 22 22 21 15 8 5 1 0 2 1 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 Existing Truck Traffic Score Frequency Accessibility Score Frequency 50 50 40 40 30 20 10 0 22 21 20 15 9 4 4 1 0 1 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 30 20 10 0 24 20 19 9 8 9 4 1 1 2 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0

Lowest Rated Criteria Hurricane Evacuation Route Score Frequency Population Score Frequency 50 50 40 40 30 30 20 10 12 5 6 4 13 13 15 8 7 14 20 10 8 4 9 6 6 18 17 13 7 9 0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 Hurricane Evacuation Route Score Frequency 50 40 30 20 10 12 5 6 4 13 13 15 8 7 14 0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0

Where are we now? Project Listing Sent to Districts to: Confirm Data Set Supply Missing Data Provide Location Information Confirm Construction Costs Validate Need for Overlapping Projects Provide Info for Unfunded Projects NOT in DCIS Identify Prop 12 projects Identify Other Projects

Public/Stakeholder Outreach How will we involve the public? Newsletters (3) Stakeholder outreach Meetings in 8 locations (August 2011) Distribution of draft project lists and priorities (December 2011 Webinar) Distribution of final project lists (April 2012 email) Public outreach Open houses hosted by TxDOT Districts (February 2012) Public hearing (May 2012) in Austin Upcoming Tasks and Meetings

Upcoming Tasks and Meetings Next Steps: Continuous stakeholder and public outreach Preliminary list of projects Finalize criteria and analyze projects Preliminary project scoring and ranking Feedback and adjustment Upcoming Tasks and Meetings