Regional Transportation System The regional transportation system is discussed in Chapter 5, Section 5.7.

Similar documents
Regional Transportation System The regional transportation system is discussed in Chapter 5, Section 5.7.

Proposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center. Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA

TRAFFIC PARKING ANALYSIS

The major roadways in the study area are State Route 166 and State Route 33, which are shown on Figure 1-1 and described below:

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Traffic Engineering Study

PROJECT: Wilkinson Road Corridor Improvement Traffic Management Planning Project SUBJECT: Traffic Analysis

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. USD #497 Warehouse and Bus Site

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS...

APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

Traffic Impact Analysis. Alliance Cole Avenue Residential Site Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.

Table Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily

Date: February 7, 2017 John Doyle, Z-Best Products Robert Del Rio. T.E. Z-Best Traffic Operations and Site Access Analysis

8.6 NOISE Environmental Consequences

V. DEVELOPMENT OF CONCEPTS

BARRHAVEN FELLOWSHIP CRC 3058 JOCKVALE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT

Transportation & Traffic Engineering

Technical Feasibility Report

Letter of Transmittal

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Results

Appendix H TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Traffic Impact Study Speedway Gas Station Redevelopment

Section 5.0 Traffic Information

LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS

Appendix C-5: Proposed Refinements Rail Operations and Maintenance Facility (ROMF) Traffic Impact Analysis. Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

Railroad Impact Study

Shirk Road at State Route 198 Interchange Analysis Tulare County, California

STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Report

Clean Harbors Canada, Inc.

Location Concept Plan Amendment Recommendation Approved 2011 Concept Plan

MINERVA PARK SITE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY M/I HOMES. September 2, 2015

Traffic Impact Analysis 5742 BEACH BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT

Evaluation of Renton Ramp Meters on I-405

Environmental Assessment Derry Road and Argentia Road Intersection

Transit City Etobicoke - Finch West LRT

ANDERSON PROPERTY SITE ANALYSIS

Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Replacement

5.9 TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

1. INTRODUCTION 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION CUBES SELF-STORAGE MILL CREEK TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON

April 7, Mr. Blake Shutler Compass Homes Development LLC Summit Homes Construction, LLC PO Box 6539 Dillon, CO 80435

Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis Turtle Creek Boulevard Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.

Quantitative analyses of weekday a.m. and p.m. commuter hour conditions have been conducted for the following five scenarios:

City of Marina. Regional Roundabout Study Utilizing Caltrans Intersection Control Evaluation Section 4: Transportation Agency for Monterey County

Appendix Q Traffic Study

TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

MEMO. McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION. File FROM: Keyur Shah DATE: February 1, 2010 COPIES: OUR FILE: SUBJECT: TO:

AVERAGE DELAY PER VEHICLE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND NO BUILD ALTERNATIVE

Appendix J Traffic Impact Study

Escondido Marriott Hotel and Mixed-Use Condominium Project TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT

NEWCASTLE MIDDLE SCHOOL Traffic Impact Analysis

APPENDIX J LAKE WOHLFORD DAM REPLACEMENT PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (DAM REPLACEMENT) Lake Wohlford Dam Replacement Project EIR

Traffic Impact Statement (TIS)

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Output

Bennett Pit. Traffic Impact Study. J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado. March 3, 2017

Sound Transit East Link: Bus/LRT System Integration Study

RTE. 1 at RTE. 637 & RTE. 639

HIGHWAY 28 FUNCTIONAL DESIGN

Craig Scheffler, P.E., PTOE HNTB North Carolina, P.C. HNTB Project File: Subject

Proposed Commercial Service at Paine Field Traffic Impact Analysis

DRAFT TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY CASTILIAN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT

MILLERSVILLE PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND

TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR THE 8899 BEVERLY BOULEVARD PROJECT

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE. Executive Summary... xii

DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY 1627 MAXIME STREET CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: Subhas Bhargava. July 9, Overview_1.

Freeway Weaving and Ramp Junction Analysis

BERKELEY DOWNTOWN AREA PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS

Traffic and Toll Revenue Estimates

US 69/75 Controlled Access Highway and Grade Separations Benefit-Cost Analysis Narrative

RE: A Traffic Impact Statement for a proposed development on Quinpool Road

Re: Addendum No. 4 Transportation Overview 146 Mountshannon Drive Ottawa, Ontario

Draft Report: West Berkeley Bowl Project

Traffic, Transportation & Civil Engineering Ali R. Khorasani, P.E. P.O. Box 804, Spencer, MA 01562, Tel: (508)

Table 1 Eagle River Station Trip Generation Estimate Eagle, Colorado (LSC #110150; May, 2011) Trip Generation Rates (1),(2) Total Trips Generated Land

TIMBERVINE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY Prepared for:

APPENDIX E. Traffic Analysis Report

BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY

TALMONT TOWNHOMES MADISON KENNETH SPA TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Sacramento, CA. Prepared For: MBK Homes. Prepared By:

MEMO. McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION. File Mark VanderSluis, Keyur Shah DATE: October 26, 2009 COPIES: OUR FILE: TO: FROM: Jack Thompson

Traffic Impact Study for the proposed. Town of Allegany, New York. August Project No Prepared For:

2. Valley Circle Boulevard/Andora Avenue/Baden Avenue and Lassen Street

LCPS Valley Service Center

CHAPTER 9: VEHICULAR ACCESS CONTROL Introduction and Goals Administration Standards

Highway 18 BNSF Railroad Overpass Feasibility Study Craighead County. Executive Summary

Traffic Impact Study Morgan Road Commerce Park Pasco County, Florida

King County Metro. Columbia Street Transit Priority Improvements Alternative Analysis. Downtown Southend Transit Study. May 2014.

L1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY Prepared for:

Appendix M. Traffic Impact Analysis Report

APPENDIX D SBCT PROJECT DETAILS

Lacey Gateway Residential Phase 1

US 81 Bypass of Chickasha Environmental Assessment Public Meeting

Interstate 85 Widening Phase III Interchange Modification Report Exit 106 E. Cherokee Street. Cherokee County, SC

Ryan Coyne, PE City Engineer City of Rye 1051 Boston Post Road Rye, NY Boston Post Road Realignment and Roundabout Design Report

LOTUS RANCH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. LLG Ref Senior Transportation Engineer & Charlene Sadiarin Transportation Engineer II

Appendix 5. Haymeadow Interim Traffic Analysis

APPENDIX B Traffic Analysis

2.1.5 Traffic and Circulation. Table Level of Service Criteria for Highway Segment Regulatory Setting Affected Environment

Transcription:

6.7 TRAFFIC 6.7.1 Affected Environment Regional Transportation System The regional transportation system is discussed in Chapter 5, Section 5.7. Local Transportation System The proposed Dillingham Trail between SBMR and DMR would generally follow the existing travel corridor (See Figure 6-10). Going north, the travel corridor follows Wilikina Drive from SBMR to Kaukonahua Road, Kaukonahua Road from Wilikina Drive to Farrington Highway, and Farrington Highway to DMR. The connection between Farrington Road and DMR is partially via a sugar cane haul road and other local unnamed roads. These roadways are discussed separately. Kunia Road Kunia Road (SR 750) between SBMR (Trimble Road or Foote Gate) and Wilikina Drive is a four-lane divided state roadway. The posted speed limit is 35 miles (56 kilometers) per hour. There are signals at the intersections of Kunia Road with Trimble Road and Kunia Road with Wilikina Drive. The average daily traffic (ADT) is approximately 25,000 VPD. The morning peak-hour traffic volumes are 1,000 vph northbound and 880 vph southbound. The afternoon peakhour volumes are 1,210 vph northbound and 840 vph southbound. Wilikina Drive Wilikina Drive (SR 803) is a four-lane divided roadway between Kunia Road and Funston Gate and a two-lane undivided roadway from Funston Gate to Kaukonahua Road. The posted speed limit is 35 mph from Kunia Road to McNair Gate, 25 mph from McNair Gate to Kamananui Road, and 45 mph from Kamananui Road to Kaukonahua Road. There are traffic signals at the intersections with Macomb Gate and Kamananui Road. Between Kunia Road and McNair Gate, the ADT is approximately 27,400 vehicles. The northbound and southbound morning peak-hour volumes are 1,080 vph and 1,040 vph, respectively. During the afternoon peak hour, the northbound and southbound volumes are 1,200 vph and 1,100 vph, respectively. Between McNair Gate and Kamananui Road, the ADT is 16,000 vehicles. The northbound and southbound morning peak hour volumes are 380 vph and 650 vph, respectively. During the afternoon peak hour, the northbound and southbound volumes are 950 vph and 550 vph, respectively. May 2004 Stryker Brigade Combat Team Final EIS, Hawai i 6-48

Figure 6-10 Peak Hour Volumes Worst Case Scenario on Dillingham Trail May 2004 Stryker Brigade Combat Team Final EIS, Hawai i 6-49

Between Kamananui Road and Kaukonahua Road, the ADT is 7,780 vehicles. The northbound and southbound morning peak-hour volumes are 70 vph and 490 vph, respectively. During the afternoon peak hour, the northbound and southbound volumes are 430 vph and 250 vph, respectively. Kaukonahua Road Kaukonahua Road is a two-lane undivided state roadway between Wahiawā and Waialua. For approximately one mile (1.6 kilometers) north of Kaukonahua Road, the posted speed limit is 45 mph. North of this point, the speed limit is 35 mph because the terrain constrains the roadway alignment. Between Kaukonahua Road and Farrington Highway, the ADT is 10,000 vehicles. The northbound and southbound morning peak-hour volumes are 130 vph and 500 vph, respectively. During the afternoon peak hour, the northbound and southbound volumes are 545 vph and 330 vph, respectively. Farrington Highway From Kaukonahua Road to DMR, Farrington Highway (SR 930) is a two-lane, undivided state highway. The posted speed limit is 35 mph, except for a short section posted for 45 mph and a section adjacent to Waialua Intermediate School and Waialua High School, where the speed limit is reduced to 25 mph. Along Farrington Highway in Waialua, the ADT is approximately 8,800 vehicles. The eastbound and westbound morning peak hour volumes are 305 vph and 240 vph, respectively. During the afternoon peak hour, the eastbound and westbound volumes are 300 vph and 390 vph, respectively. In the vicinity of DMR, the ADT is less than 1,000 vehicles. The morning and afternoon peak hour volumes are less than 100 vph. 6.7.2 Environmental Consequences This section addresses the environmental consequences of the Proposed Action and No Action on traffic. Summary of Impacts A summary of traffic impacts at DMR is shown in Table 6-14. Intersection operations, roadway segment operations, construction traffic, and parking impacts would be less than significant with the Proposed Action and Reduced Land Acquisition Alternative. There would be no traffic impacts under No Action. May 2004 Stryker Brigade Combat Team Final EIS, Hawai i 6-50

Impact Issues Table 6-14 Summary of Potential Traffic Impacts at DMR Proposed Action Reduced Land Acquisition No Action Intersection operations Roadway segment operations Construction traffic Parking In cases when there would be both beneficial and adverse impacts, both are shown on this table. Mitigation measures would only apply to adverse impacts. LEGEND: = Significant + = Beneficial impact = Significant but mitigable to less than significant = Less than significant = No impact N/A = Not applicable Proposed Action (Preferred Alternative) Strykers would be used, up to one company level, for off-road training. Troops would be transported by Strykers and trucks up to one company level plus support trucks. A perpetual easement of 55 acres (22.3 hectares) would be acquired for Dillingham Trail. The road would be constructed on private plantation roads owned by Dole Food Co., Inc., and other private landowners. Dillingham Trail is proposed to be a one-lane gravel road, 15 feet (5 meters) wide and approximately 11 miles (18 kilometers) long, connecting SBMR to DMR. The proposed Dillingham Trail would not be open to the public. Until the trail is constructed all military vehicles would continue to use public roads. The estimated military vehicle traffic between SBMR and DMR is shown in Table 6-15. Less than Significant Impacts Intersection operations. Dillingham Trail would cross state highways at two locations. The first crossing would be at Kaukonahua Road north of Farrington Highway. The peak-hour traffic volumes along this section of Kaukonahua Road are 412 vph during the morning peak hour and 489 vph during the afternoon peak hour (HDOT 2001). The second crossing would be at Farrington Highway, west of Kaukonahua Road. The morning and afternoon peak hourly traffic volumes along Farrington Road at this location are 547 and 690 vph, respectively. A LOS analysis was performed for the highways and crossings using the following assumptions: The maximum number of vehicles was used for calculations (four convoys of 24 vehicles each, sequenced at 15-minute intervals); May 2004 Stryker Brigade Combat Team Final EIS, Hawai i 6-51

The convoys would stop for traffic along the state highways, so an intersection would be two-way stop sign-controlled; and The convoys would approach the state highways during the peak hour of traffic. As noted above, convoys would be scheduled for non-peak hours, but, by assuming peak-hour conditions, a worst-case condition was analyzed. Table 6-15 Estimated Military Vehicle Traffic Between SBMR and DMR Vehicle Density (vehicles per convoy) Company Level Exercise, Current Force Number of Convoys Trail- Roadway Split Annual Frequency Trucks 15 1 All road 1 Company Level Exercise, Proposed Action Trucks 6 1 60/40 1 1 Strykers 11 1 90/10 1 1 Battalion Level Exercise, Current Force Trucks 0 2 0 0 0 Battalion Level Exercise, Proposed Action Trucks 6 1 60/40 4 Strykers 11 1 90/10 4 Brigade Level Exercise, Current Force Trucks 24 2 8 All road 2 Brigade Level Exercise, Proposed Action Trucks 24 8 60/40 1 Strykers 6 1 90/10 1 Source: John Gallup & Associates 2002 Notes: 1 Brigade Headquarters and Headquarters Company (HHC) performs exercises four times per year. 2 Current forces would not conduct multi-location exercises. According to the LOS analysis, both state highway crossings would operate at LOS C under worst-case conditions. Convoy traffic would experience delays because they would yield to traffic along the state highways. Because the convoys would yield to through traffic, there would be no impact on LOS on public highways. The identified impact would be less than significant. While no mitigation is required for project impacts on traffic congestion, the Army will operate a public Internet Web site that lists a schedule of upcoming USARHAW activities, including training and public involvement projects. Subject to force protection measures and other security measures, the site would contain USARHAW training and convoy schedules, community projects the USARHAW is involved in, any USARHAW activity or function that May 2004 Stryker Brigade Combat Team Final EIS, Hawai i 6-52

the public could attend, any general USARHAW news that might be of interest to the public, and USARHAW services available to the public. Roadway segment operations. The number of military vehicles using the proposed Dillingham Trail would be minimal. The maximum number of vehicles per convoy would be 24. Convoys would be sequenced at 15- to 30-minute intervals, so the maximum hourly volume would be 96 vehicles per hour. Convoys would be scheduled during non-peak traffic hours, thus reducing potential impacts on peak-hour traffic conditions. Because the increase of military traffic on public roadways would be minimal, the LOS would not change. The identified impact would be less than significant, and no mitigation would be necessary. Before the DMR trail is constructed, all SBCT military vehicles would use public roadways to access DMR. Because convoys would still operate with a maximum hourly volume of 96 vehicles, as described above, the short-term elevated use of the roadways would operate at LOS C under worst-case conditions. While there would be noticeable delays, the impacts would be less than significant. Construction traffic. Construction associated with the Proposed Action would generate additional traffic from worker vehicles and trucks. However, construction traffic would be temporary and minimal in relation to overall traffic levels. To minimize traffic impacts to the surrounding community during construction, a construction traffic management program would be implemented. The program would include staggered work hours to reduce impacts from construction workers during peak hours, identified truck routes to limit truck traffic to major streets, and designated parking for construction workers. Since project traffic does not significantly affect operations at the intersections and street segments in the project vicinity and traffic is generally free flowing, the interim construction worker traffic impacts would not be significant. The identified impact would be less than significant, and no mitigation would be necessary. No Impacts Parking. No parking impacts are expected from the proposed change. Reduced Land Acquisition Alternative The impacts associated with Reduced Land Acquisition would be identical to those described for the Proposed Action. No Action Alternative Less than Significant Impacts Roadway segment operations. Under No Action, existing conditions from roadway segment operations would continue. Under the status quo of No Action, impacts to traffic would continue at their current levels. Current forces would continue to travel on public roads to DMR, possibly contributing to roadway congestion. BMPs would be followed. Convoy and transport would only occur at non-peak hours. Advance notice of military transport would be provided to the public in the event of a large-scale convoy activity. May 2004 Stryker Brigade Combat Team Final EIS, Hawai i 6-53

No Impacts Intersection operations. Under No Action, existing conditions from intersection operations would continue. Under the status quo of No Action, impacts to traffic would continue at their current levels. Use of the facility and operations would remain the same. Construction traffic. Under No Action, existing conditions from construction traffic would continue. Under the status quo of No Action, impacts to traffic would continue at their current levels. Parking. Under No Action, existing conditions from parking would continue. Under the status quo of No Action, impacts to traffic would continue at their current levels. May 2004 Stryker Brigade Combat Team Final EIS, Hawai i 6-54