mga research corporation

Similar documents
SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 225 Child Restraint Anchorage Systems

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 225 Child Restraint Anchorage Systems

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 225 Child Restraint Anchorage Systems

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 202a Head Restraints

MGA Research Corporation

Chapter 2 Dynamic Analysis of a Heavy Vehicle Using Lumped Parameter Model

CRITERIA FOR LABORATORY ACCREDITATION IN THE FIELD OF TORQUE METROLOGY (Torque Generating Device Calibration)

Test Report Current (Gen 2) Pendant Armor and Gen 3 Pendant Armor Polymer A Hanger and Polymer B Hanger March 16, 2016 (Q022516U1R2) Testing Location

Contact person Date Reference Page Mikael Videby P08110A 1 (6) SP Structural and Solid Mechanics

Executive Summary. The testing was conducted with the following steps in order to evaluate the tyre pressure decay.

REPORT NO. TR-P NC SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 223 REAR IMPACT GUARDS 2007 TRANSFREIGHT TECHNOLOGY NHTSA NO.

PENTAGON PROTECTION USA

TITLE: EVALUATING SHEAR FORCES ALONG HIGHWAY BRIDGES DUE TO TRUCKS, USING INFLUENCE LINES

Theory of Machines II EngM323 Laboratory User's manual Version I

Load Cells. For Test, Measurement, and Monitoring Requirements in Automotive, Aerospace, R&D, and Process Control Applications

Crashworthiness Evaluation. Roof Strength Test Protocol (Version III)

USV Ultra Shear Viscometer

Non-contact Deflection Measurement at High Speed

Report on Usefulness of Data Collected and Plausibility of the Electric Car s Motor Zainab Hussein

VELOCICALC MULTI-FUNCTION VENTILATION METER MODEL 9565

An Urgent Bulletin from CSA Group

This white paper details how these critical engineering factors should be addressed when designing and sizing a screw jack system.

FAAC International, Inc.

WP5 - Computational Mechanics B1 (ESP-N2) Barrier Steel N2 MAIN REPORT Volume 2 of 2

SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS NO. 214S SIDE IMPACT PROTECTION (STATIC)

EMI / RFI Shielding Products. Shielding Honeycomb Ventilation Panels and Dust Filtration Characteristics

Determination of Spring Modulus for Several Types of Elastomeric Materials (O-rings) and Establishment of an Open Database For Seals*

IMPACT REGISTER, INC. PRECISION BUILT RECORDERS SINCE 1914

Performance Based Design for Bridge Piers Impacted by Heavy Trucks

600 Amp Surge Arrester

SFI SPECIFICATION 49.2 EFFECTIVE: MARCH 22, 2011 *

WP5 - Computational Mechanics B5 - Temporary Vertical Concrete Safety Barrier MAIN REPORT Volume 1 of 1

Report. PIBCV Tests. Report 52724/1 Edition 2 February 2010

Field test for the comparison of LNG static and dynamic mass measurement methods

Time-Dependent Behavior of Structural Bolt Assemblies with TurnaSure Direct Tension Indicators and Assemblies with Only Washers

Calibration of Pipe Provers in the field

EMC Research Institute

TEST REPORT FOR: Product Design Group Inc. Elevation Manual Wheelchair 115 kg, 253 lb

The goal of the study is to investigate the effect of spring stiffness on ride height and aerodynamic balance.

Cornering & Traction Test Rig MTS Flat-Trac IV CT plus

Outline. Terms To Be Familiar With (cont d) Terms To Be Familiar With. Deflectometer Equipment. Why are these two terms critical?

Wheel lift sensors used during dynamic testing of light vehicles

Non-Destructive Pavement Testing at IDOT. LaDonna R. Rowden, P.E. Pavement Technology Engineer

SFI SPECIFICATION 35.2 EFFECTIVE: DECEMBER 29, 2014 *

THERMAL SHOCK TEST REPORT

RSA Protective Technologies

NovitaTech Engineering

Impact of Heavy Loads on State and Parish Bridges. Aziz Saber, Ph.D., P.E. Program Chair Civil Engineering Louisiana Tech University

Introduction to Seminar: Technical Content. Terms To Be Familiar With. Outline. 5. Garbage in, garbage out (6)

2.0 TEST PROCEDURES AND RESULTS Vibration Test TEST EQUIPMENT AND INSTRUMENTATION QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM 7 ATTACHMENTS

Case study on Carbon Fiber spring suspension for FORD ENDEVOUR THUNDER+

CB50X & CB50X-DL load cells Influence factors in weighbridge application

REPORT NUMBER: 301-MGA SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 301R FUEL SYSTEM INTEGRITY REAR IMPACT

Enhanced Prediction of Vehicle Fuel Economy and Other Vehicle Operating Costs (FHWA DTFH61-14-C-00044)

Copyright Statement FPC International, Inc

Analysis and control of vehicle steering wheel angular vibrations

Schedule. 200 C to 400 C. 400 C to 660 C C to 800 C C to 1300 C C to 1200 C. 0 C to 1700 C. 0 C to 1700 C.

Surface- and Pressure-Dependent Characterization of SAE Baja Tire Rolling Resistance

Use of New High Performance Thin Overlays (HPTO)

TEST REPORT. Rendered to: HOMELAND VINYL PRODUCTS, INC. For: PVC Guardrail System Utilizing New Nylon/PVC Rail Mounting Bracket

inter.noise 2000 The 29th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering August 2000, Nice, FRANCE

Article: Sulfur Testing VPS Quality Approach By Dr Sunil Kumar Laboratory Manager Fujairah, UAE

SHOCK ABSORBER/DAMPER TESTING MACHINE

Product Loss During Retail Motor Fuel Dispenser Inspection

FINAL REPORT FOR THE C-130 RAMP TEST #3 OF A HYDREMA MINE CLEARING VEHICLE

NanoShine Group Corp.

CommWeigh Axle Standard Module

STATUS OF NHTSA S EJECTION MITIGATION RESEARCH. Aloke Prasad Allison Louden National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

Test Report. for. Chilicon Power 1563 Calle Patricia Pacific Palisades, CA USA. Project Number: G Prepared By:

TRACEABILITY OF THE CALIBRATION OF TEST CAR FOR ROLL BRAKE TESTER Aimo Pusa Raute-MIKES Finland, by Raute Precision Oy, Force and Mass Laboratory

Our test laboratory - Apparatebau Kirchheim-Teck GmbH

R-Solutions Spike Hole Plugging Compound Static and Dynamic Load Tests

TOWARDS THE APPLICATION OF STRESS-IN-MOTION (SIM) RESULTS IN PAVEMENT DESIGN AND INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION

Larson Systems Inc. V200, V750 and V1500 Digital Valve Spring Tester User Manual. Current for Software Version 6.9

CRITERIA FOR LABORATORY ACCREDITATION IN THE FIELD OF FORCE METROLOGY:- CALIBRATION OF UNIAXIAL TESTING MACHINES

Presented at the 2012 Aerospace Space Power Workshop Manhattan Beach, CA April 16-20, 2012

GLOBAL ORGANIZATION - LOCAL SUPPORT TESTING EQUIPMENT

Static Load and Vibration Performance of Six Timber Bridges Constructed Using Local Species in Northern Michigan

QUALITY REQUIREMENTS FOR JUST IN TIME SERVICE PROVIDER (JIT S.P.) PROGRAM: ALL

Pressure balance Differential pressure version Model CPB5600DP

SUSPENSION PARAMETER MEASUREMENTS OF WHEELED MILITARY VEHICLES

Power Electronics and Drives (PED)

REMOTE MINE AREA CLEARANCE EQUIPMENT (MACE) C-130 LOAD CELL TEST DATA

VIBRATION AND MECHANICAL SHOCK TEST REPORT

Crashworthiness Analysis with Abaqus

PART 665 BUS TESTING. Subpart A General. 49 CFR Ch. VI ( Edition)

Lead Acid Batteries Modeling and Performance Analysis of BESS in Distributed Generation

Environmental Test Report

Model P001 Piston Flow Meter (Analog) to 200 cc/min

REPORT NUMBER: 301-MGA SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 301R FUEL SYSTEM INTEGRITY REAR IMPACT

User Manual. Aarhus University School of Engineering. Windtunnel Balance

Performance Testing of Composite Bearing Materials for Large Hydraulic Cylinders

City of Storm Lake Fire Department Heavy Rescue Specifications

CHAPTER 7 VEHICLES... 2

NATIONAL TECHNICAL SYSTEMS

2. provide data indicating what types and sizes of particles are not removed by used PHEAF devices, and

Shock tube based dynamic calibration of pressure sensors

Sentinel Panametrics Custody Transfer Gas Ultrasonic Flowmeter

A TECHNICAL INSPECTOR S GUIDE TO THE 2012 FSAE RULES PART 1 RULES CHANGE SUMMARY & ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES

Transcription:

mga research corporation UNDERGROUND TECHNOLOGIES MAN-HOLE CONSTRUCTION VERTICAL STATIC LOAD TEST SERIES (PO# 11521) 446 executive drive troy, mi 48083 248 / 577-5001 fax 248 / 577-5025 www.mgaresearch.com

mga research corporation TEST REPORT MGA REPORT NO.: C07Q7-099.1 TEST (S) PERFORMED ON: May 11, 2007 TEST DESCRIPTION: ITEM DESCRIPTION: PROCEDURE: TEST REFERENCE NUMBER (S): TEST LABORATORY: Vertical Static Load Man-Hole Construction (PO# 11521) ASHTO HS-25 Spec VE7314-VE7316 MGA Research Corporation 446 Executive Drive Troy, Michigan 48083 SUBMITTED TO: Mike Mortier Underground Technologies. 2546 Elliott Troy, Michigan 48083 MGA PERSONNEL: Brad Reaume Project Leader Test Personnel: Gerald Roesser * The results presented in this report relate only to the specified test items. ** This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of the laboratory. 446 executive drive troy, mi 48083 248 / 577-5001 fax 248 / 577-5025 www.mgaresearch.com 0850-01

MGA Report No.: C07Q7-099.1 Customer: Underground Technologies Page 2 of 26 Introduction: MGA Research is to perform test and provide testing results for the Underground Technologies man-hole adjustment ring. The test is to prove that the man-hole construction will pass the ASHTO HS 25 and consequently the HS 20 testing protocol. ASHTO HS-25 Testing Protocol: The ASHTO HS-25 testing protocol represents the loading of a 25 ton (50,000 lbs ) semi-truck would exert onto a highway bridge. Since there is no specification for compression strength of man-hole adjustment rings, this testing protocol will be used. See Appendix A. Load Calculations: When investigating the free body diagram of the protocol; for HS-25 the load is determined by using 40,000 lbs times a factor of 0.4, thus the loads are calculated. Static Load: 16,000 lbs on a 10 x 20 patch. Dynamic Load: 1.3 times the static load; 20,800 lbs. This load simulates the load of the tire patch dropping one foot on to the manhole cover. * Please note the ASHTO HS-25 doubles the weight required on the tire patch. Standard axles are rated at a maximum capacity of 16,000 lbs. total. Normal maximum weight exerted on each wheel combination or patch in a real world scenario would be 8,000 lbs.

MGA Report No.: C07Q7-099.1 Customer: Underground Technologies Page 3 of 26 Test Setup: The Grade Ring and Finish Ring were placed on a base plate of the Crusher Ld. Cell which has a capacity of 50,000 lbs. Deflection measurements were taken digitally with a MTS Multi-purpose static analyzer. Two cameras were set up to monitor the test; one for a global view, two, a side profile of stacked rings. The load is exerted on the manhole cover with a 10 x 20 plate as specified to reflect the AASHTO-HS25 specification. Test Samples: Three samples were tested: # Configuration Test Identification 1) 5 ½ Grade Ring with 1 ½ Finish Ring VE7314 2) 1 ½ Grade Ring with 1 ½ Finish Ring VE7315 3) 2 Restoration Ring ( No grade or finish ) VE7316 Test Procedures: Two test samples will consist of a grade and finish ring of different height configurations. The third test sample consisted of a single Restoration Ring. The test samples The load of the hydraulic test apparatus will exert on top of the manhole frame and cover assembly. Step 1: Apply in 5,000 lb increments and hold for five minutes while taking measurements. Step 2: Increase load to 10,000 lbs. and hold for five minutes while taking measurements. Step 3: Apply additional 6,000 lbs. and hold for 10 minutes. This will bring the total load to 16,000 lbs. which will represents the maximum load for the AASHTO-HS25 static test. Step 4: Increase load to 20,800 take measurements, backing load off to for 500ms and reloading to the 20,800 in 500 ms. Repeat 3 times. This load will represent the maximum load for the AASHTO-HS25 dynamic test. Step 5: Increase load to 40,000 lbs. and hold. This is the destructive test to indicate the permanent set or deflection of an excessive load.

MGA Report No.: C07Q7-099.1 Customer: Underground Technologies Page 4 of 26 Results: Load (lbs)/sample (in) VE7314- ( 5.5G & 1.5F) VE7315- ( 1.5G & 1.5F) VE7316- ( 2R) 5,000 0.04154 0.02617 0.02441 10,000 0.06733 0.04242 0.03608 16,000 HS-25 Static 0.09487 0.05829 0.04669 20,800 HS-25 Dynamic 0.12699 0.07137 0.05634 40,000 Destructive 0.40555 0.11799 0.12722 Conclusion: The results table shows the deflection relative to the load step. The deflections were low at the specified AASHTO HS-25 Dynamic load (20,800 lbs.) with no permanent set to the Grade or Finish Ring. All rings rebounded to original state. The permanent set or deflection occurred at the 40,000 lb. destructive test. The permanent deflection was measured at 1/32 for the Grade and Finish rings. Although localized bucking phenomena occurred at the 40,000 lb. load, the test samples remained intact with no cracking of the exterior seal. See Appendix C for Pre and Post-Test Photographs as well as the resultant graphs. Additional Information can be found in the following appendices Appendix A Customer Related Documentation ASHTO HS-25...5 Appendix B System Calibration Information...7 Appendix C Test Data Plots and Photographs...10

MGA Report No.: C07Q7-099.1 Customer: Underground Technologies Page 5 of 26 Appendix A Customer Related Documentation ASHTO HS-25

MGA Report No.: C07Q7-099.1 Customer: Underground Technologies Page 6 of 26

MGA Report No.: C07Q7-099.1 Customer: Underground Technologies Page 7 of 26 Appendix B System Calibration Information

MGA Report No.: C07Q7-099.1 Customer: Underground Technologies Page 8 of 26 mga research corporation CALIBRATION CERTIFICATE Name: Crusher Ld. Cell Model: 1220GR-50K Sensor Information Reference Sensor Information Name: Interface 25 K Ref. Model: 1220ACK S/N: 151443 S/N: 257619 Capacity: 50000 lb Capacity: 25000 lb Calibration Date: 01/17/2007 Calibration Date: 12/07/2006 Calibrated By: Interface Test Reference Number: 151443.txt New DLR (100k, Units: lb): 10756.3 Linearity (%) 99.949 % Difference in DLR (New vs. Old): 0.1 Temperature ( o F): 70 Humidity (%): 27 Performed By: Approved By: All calibrations are traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Estimated uncertainty of the measurement is ± 0.4%. All certification data and equipment are on file for inspection at your request. Best uncertainties represent expanded uncertainties expressed at approximately the 95% confidence level using a coverage factor k=2. 446 executive drive troy, mi 48083 248 / 577-5001 fax 248 / 577-5025 www.mgaresearch.com

MGA Report No.: C07Q7-099.1 Customer: Underground Technologies Page 9 of 26

MGA Report No.: C07Q7-099.1 Customer: Underground Technologies Page 10 of 26 Appendix C Test Data Plots and Photographs

MGA Report No.: C07Q7-099.1 Customer: Underground Technologies Page 11 of 26 Underground Technologies VE7314 C07Q7-099.1 5.5" Grade 1.5" Finish 45000 40000 35000 30000 Force (lbs) 25000 20000 Series1 15000 10000 5000 0-100 100 300 500 700 900 1100 1300 1500 Time (s) Underground Technologies VE7314 C07Q7-099.1 5.5" Grade 1.5" Finish 41000 36000 31000 26000 Force (lbs) 21000 16000 Series1 11000 6000 1000 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9-4000 Displacement (in)

MGA Report No.: C07Q7-099.1 Customer: Underground Technologies Page 12 of 26 Underground Technologies VE7314 C07Q7-099.1 5.5" Grade 1.5" Finish 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 Deflection (in) 0.5 0.4 in 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 Time (s)

MGA Report No.: C07Q7-099.1 Customer: Underground Technologies Page 13 of 26 Pre-Test Photo #1 for Test # VE7314 Pre-Test Photo #2 for Test # VE7314

MGA Report No.: C07Q7-099.1 Customer: Underground Technologies Page 14 of 26 Pre-Test Photo #3 for Test # VE7314

MGA Report No.: C07Q7-099.1 Customer: Underground Technologies Page 15 of 26 Post-Test Photo #1 for Test # VE7314 Post-Test Photo #2 for Test # VE7314

MGA Report No.: C07Q7-099.1 Customer: Underground Technologies Page 16 of 26 Post-Test Photo #3 for Test # VE7314 Post-Test Photo #4 for Test # VE7314

MGA Report No.: C07Q7-099.1 Customer: Underground Technologies Page 17 of 26 Underground Technologies VE7315 C07Q7-099.1 1.5" Grade 1.5" Finish 45000 40000 35000 30000 Force (lbs) 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 0-100 100 300 500 700 900 1100 1300 1500 Time (s) Underground Technologies VE7315 C07Q7-099.1 1.5" Grade 1.5" Finish 41000 36000 31000 26000 Force (lbs) 21000 16000 Series1 11000 6000 1000 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18-4000 Displacement (in)

MGA Report No.: C07Q7-099.1 Customer: Underground Technologies Page 18 of 26 Underground Technologies VE7315 C07Q7-099.1 1.5" Grade 1.5" Finish 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 Deflection (in) 0.1 0.08 in 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 Time (s)

MGA Report No.: C07Q7-099.1 Customer: Underground Technologies Page 19 of 26 Pre-Test Photo #1 for Test # VE7315 Pre-Test Photo #2 for Test # VE7315

MGA Report No.: C07Q7-099.1 Customer: Underground Technologies Page 20 of 26 Pre-Test Photo #3 for Test # VE7315 Post-Test Photo #1 for Test # VE7315

MGA Report No.: C07Q7-099.1 Customer: Underground Technologies Page 21 of 26 Post-Test Photo #2 for Test # VE7315 Post-Test Photo #3 for Test # VE7315

MGA Report No.: C07Q7-099.1 Customer: Underground Technologies Page 22 of 26 Underground Technologies VE7316 C07Q7-099.1 2" Restoration 45000 40000 35000 30000 Force (lbs) 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 0-100 100 300 500 700 900 1100 1300 1500 Time (s) Underground Technologies VE7316 C07Q7-099.1 2" Restoration 41000 36000 31000 26000 Force (lbs) 21000 16000 Series1 11000 6000 1000 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35-4000 Displacement (in)

MGA Report No.: C07Q7-099.1 Customer: Underground Technologies Page 23 of 26 Underground Technologies VE7316 C07Q7-099.1 2" Restoration 0.35 0.3 0.25 Deflection (in) 0.2 0.15 in 0.1 0.05 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 Time (s)

MGA Report No.: C07Q7-099.1 Customer: Underground Technologies Page 24 of 26 Pre-Test Photo #1 for Test # VE7316

MGA Report No.: C07Q7-099.1 Customer: Underground Technologies Page 25 of 26 Post-Test Photo #1 for Test # VE7316 Post-Test Photo #2 for Test # VE7316

MGA Report No.: C07Q7-099.1 Customer: Underground Technologies Page 26 of 26 Post-Test Photo #3 for Test # VE7316 Post-Test Photo #4 for Test # VE7316