PHA Transportation Consultants

Similar documents
RE: A Traffic Impact Statement for a proposed development on Quinpool Road

4/2/18 MP NORTHPOINT MALL GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES

Trip and Parking Generation Study of the Peaks Ice Arena

Trip Generation and Parking Study New Californian Apartments, Berkeley

THE CORNERSTONE APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY R&M PROJECT NO

Trip Generation & Parking Occupancy Data Collection: Grocery Stores Student Chapter of Institute of Transportation Engineers at UCLA Spring 2014

Re: 233 Armstrong Street Residential Condominium Traffic Brief

This letter summarizes our observations, anticipated traffic changes, and conclusions.

Trip Generation and Parking Utilization Data Collection at Mini-Mart with Gas Station

CENTENE CLAYTON CAMPUS CLAYTON, MO

Trip and Parking Generation Data Collection at Grocery Store with Gas Station and Auto Repair

November 1, Mr. Jafar Tabrizi President, Tabrizi Rugs 180 Bedford Highway. Traffic Impact Statement BH-1 and BH-2, Southgate Drive, Bedford, NS

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017

TRAFFIC & PARKING COMMISSION. Request for a Customer Loading Zone on the west side of the 100 Block of South Beverly Drive

PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN PROPOSED MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT AT URL STAMFORD Parcel 38 Greyrock Place and Tresser Boulevard Stamford, CT April 2, 2014

RE: Taggart Retail Site Plan: Kanata West Proposal for Traffic Impact Study: Addendum #2

April 7, Mr. Blake Shutler Compass Homes Development LLC Summit Homes Construction, LLC PO Box 6539 Dillon, CO 80435

Construction Realty Co.

Frequently Asked Questions about Bus Transportation

TRAFFIC PARKING ANALYSIS

Table 1: Existing Trip Generation A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Land Use ITE Code Intensity Daily Total In Out Total In Out

APPENDIX TR-1 PARKING AND QUEUING ASSESSMENT

Traffic, Transportation & Civil Engineering Ali R. Khorasani, P.E. P.O. Box 804, Spencer, MA 01562, Tel: (508)

Re: Addendum No. 4 Transportation Overview 146 Mountshannon Drive Ottawa, Ontario

Existing Traffic Conditions

Trip Generation Study: Provo Assisted Living Facility Land Use Code: 254

Table Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily

Section 5.0 Traffic Information

IRSCH REEN Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.

Appendix J Traffic Impact Study

This letter provides SPUR s comments on the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement/ Subsequent Environmental Impact Report.

Travel Time Savings Memorandum

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS L. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC

PARKING OCCUPANCY IN WINDSOR CENTER

Abrams Associates TRIP GENERATION AND PARKING ANALYSIS. City of Berkeley

Clearing the Air in West Oakland: Port Impacts, Freight Transport & Environmental Justice

Puget Sound Transportation Panel Factors in Daily Travel Choices September 1991

MEMORANDUM. Project Description. Operational Trip Generation. Construction Trip Generation. Date: August 12, 2014 TG: To: From: Subject:

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION

SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING #3 VIRGINIA HOSPITAL CENTER (SP #177 AMENDMENT) Thursday, March 8, 2018 SITE PLAN UPDATES & PARKING

1. INTRODUCTION 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION CUBES SELF-STORAGE MILL CREEK TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON

Appendix S. Shared Parking Analysis

The Re:Queen and Sparks Traffic Brief - Addendum #2

Table 1 - Land Use Comparisons - Proposed King s Wharf Development. Retail (SF) Office (SF) 354 6,000 10, Land Uses 1

54 Parkway Drive, Rosedale Proposed Residential / Commercial Development. Transportation Assessment Report. 30 April 2018

Downtown Lee s Summit Parking Study

Salvini Consulting Inc. 459 Deer Ridge Drive Kitchener, ON N2P 0A November 8, 2017 Revised December 20, 2017

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS K.2. PARKING

Self-Driving Vehicles and Transportation Markets

,ILLS CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS TRAFFIC AND PARKING COMMISSION. July 12, 2018 TO: Traffic and Parking Commission FROM: Transportation Staff SUBJECT:

MEMO VIA . Ms. Amy Roth DPS Director, City of Three Rivers. To:

City of Lawrence Traffic Safety Commission August 1, 2016 Minutes

Summary of Findings: Parking and Trip Generation Study For Coffee/Donut Shops with Drive-Through Window. District 5 Tennessee Section: Memphis, TN

Introduction and Background Study Purpose

Abstract. Executive Summary. Emily Rogers Jean Wang ORF 467 Final Report-Middlesex County

Parking/Traffic Assessment Study

The City of Toronto s Transportation Strategy July 2007

Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis Turtle Creek Boulevard Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.

ARTICLE 8 OFF-STREET PARKING AND PRIVATE DRIVEWAY STANDARDS

More persons in the cars? Status and potential for change in car occupancy rates in Norway

Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Replacement

TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT HARVINGTON PT1 (CREST HILL)

Planned Development Application 1450 Sherman Avenue Evanston, IL TRAFFIC CIRCULATION IMPACT STUDY

Stittsville OC Transpo Services

East Stockton Boulevard (South Sacramento) Costco Gasoline Expansion Fuel Station Expansion Trip Generation Estimate

PROPOSED TRAFFIC RESOLUTION

ANDERSON PROPERTY SITE ANALYSIS

Costco Gasoline Fuel Station Transportation Characteristics

Berkeley Unified School District Transportation Guide for Special Needs Students

RE: 3605 Paul Anka Drive Addendum #2 to the December 2012 Traffic Impact Study

RE: 67/71 Marquette Avenue Redevelopment Transportation Overview

Mercer Island Center for the Arts Parking Management Plan

Motor Vehicle Regulations Fall 2018

Economic and Social Council

APPENDIX B Traffic Analysis

DIVISION 400 OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING

In the Interest of Safety

2014 Bay Area Council Survey Report of Selected Results: Energy and Communications

8150 Sunset Bl Valet on Crescent Heights Bl 4 messages

Parks and Transportation System Development Charge Methodology

Updates of Land Use Parking and Traffic Generation Surveys

Central London Congestion Charging Scheme. 17 March 2005 Impacts - 9 th Annual Conference. Michele Dix Director Congestion Charging Division

CHAPTER 9. PARKING SUPPLY

What is the Connector?

BETHLEHEM MISSIONS TRUST CAMPUS

CTR Employer Survey Report

TRANSPORTATION REVIEW

The Township Guide to Parking Restrictions

WATFORD LOCAL PLAN PART 2. Review of Car Parking Policy and Standards. Evidence Base. February 2012

APPENDIX VMT Evaluation

Access Management Standards

Disclaimer. Additional information. Crash fact sheets. Travel survey fact sheets

STAFF REPORT. Meeting Date: June 29, Request from the Luxe Rodeo Drive Hotel to Provide Expanded Valet Parking Services for Summer 2017

CTR Employer Survey Report

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM

Traffic Impact Analysis. Alliance Cole Avenue Residential Site Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.

appendix 4: Parking Management Study, Phase II

Mysuru PBS Presentation on Prepared by: Directorate of Urban Land Transport

2701 INTERTECH DRIVE, YOUNGSTOWN, MAHONING COUNTY, INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY FOR SALE 143,789 SF on ACRES $4,300,000

APPENDIX C-2. Traffic Study Supplemental Analysis Memo

Transcription:

PHA Transportation Consultants 2711 Stuart Street Berkeley CA 94705 Phone (510) 848-9233 Web www.pangho.com SUPPLEMENTAL ITEM Page 1 of 8 Dec 19, 2014 Chris Hoff Evans Property (Via email) Dear Mr. Hoff: In response to your request, we have prepared this letter report for your proposed livework project on Second Street Berkeley. The purpose of the report is to estimate the project s potential vehicle traffic generation for city review as part of the approval process. As you described earlier, these live-work unit are about 1,100 square feet in size with one bedroom and a work space designed for artists, craftsmen, and hobbyists, who would be living and working at the same units; and that each unit comes with just one parking space. In this sense, this type of development would generate little to no trip during the peak hours (morning and afternoon commute hours). However, it is quite possible that each of these units may generate a couple of trips on a daily basis (non peak hour trips) as occupants may need to go out for shopping, meeting, and or to eat. Assuming a conservative scenario that tenants from each of these unit would need to go out two times daily in his/her vehicle, this would generate 76 vehicle trips daily (38 outbound and 38 inbound). In reality, it is quite likely that tenants would go out once daily on the average, In other words, the live-work project may generate fewer than the 76 trips as estimated. We understand the site is currently zoned MU-LI for light industrial use. Based on industry standard trip generation rates obtained from the Trip Generation Manual 9 th Edition published by the Institute of Transportation Engineer (ITE), the 30,000 square feet building could generate 209 daily trips, as opposed to the estimated 76 daily trips for the proposed livework project. The ITE Trip Generation Manual is a compilation trip rates based on surveyed trip rates obtained from driveway counts for various land uses throughout the country. These rates were updated frequently as new survey data becomes available. Unfortunately, there are no available trips rates for the proposed live-work land use. As such, we estimated the trip generation for the project based on our understanding of the nature, characteristics and size of the project as you provided to us. 1

SUPPLEMENTAL ITEM Page 2 of 8 As part of the analysis, we have also looked at trips rates for similar uses. Table 1 shows a comparison of trip generation for uses such as apartments, condos, and townhomes. A trip generation comparison assuming the proposed building is developed for light industrial uses is also presented. 2

SUPPLEMENTAL ITEM Page 3 of 8 Table 1 Project Trip Generation Analysis Second Street Live-work Development - Berkeley AM Peak Hour Trips PM Peak Hour Trips Daily Trips Assumed Land Use (for comparison purposes) Unit (Ksf) Rates In Trips Out Trips Rates In Trips Out Trips Rates In Trips Out Trips Apartment (ITE 221) 19 0.46 21% 1 79% 7 0.58 65% 7 35% 3 6.59 50% 63 50% 63 Condo/Townhome (ITE 230) 19 0.44 17% 1 83% 7 0.52 67% 7 33% 3 5.81 50% 55 50% 55 Light Industrial (ITE 110) (30) 0.92 88% 24 12% 3 0.97 12% 3 88% 26 6.97 50% 105 50% 105 Proposed Live-work * 19 0.40 30% 2 70% 5 0.50 70% 6 30% 2 4.00 50% 38 50% 38 Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual 9th Edition. *Traffic engineer s estimates as there are no live-work rates from the ITE Trip Generation Manual. The peak hour trips are conservative estimates as tenants are not like to commute to work during the normal commute peak hours. The peak hour trip rates are estimated based on comparison with the Condo/Townhome rates. 3

SUPPLEMENTAL ITEM Page 4 of 8 Additionally, we have reviewed the Bay Area census data for use of transportation modes for going to and from work (see Table 2). Accordingly, the 2010 data for the City of Berkeley shows about 48% of Berkeley workers would drive alone to and from work. While the census data does not have transportation mode for non work related trips, we believe some of the site generated traffic are not vehicle trips. Our analysis assuming that all trips generated from the project are vehicle trips, is conservative and likely over estimated the project traffic generation. Please feel free to call if you have any questions. Sincerely, AICP Principal 4

SUPPLEMENTAL ITEM Page 5 of 8 Table 2 Means of Transportation to Work for Worker 16 Years and Over City of Berkeley 2000 2010 Total 54,674 100.0% 51,263 100.0% Car, truck, or van: 28,885 52.8% 24,356 47.5% Drove alone 23,626 43.2% 20,722 40.4% Carpooled 5,259 9.6% 3,634 7.1% Public transportation (Census 2000 includes taxicabs, ACS excludes them) 10,156 18.6% 9,050 17.7% Bus or trolley bus 3,626 6.6% 3,155 6.2% Streetcar or trolley car 111 0.2% 39 0.1% Subway or elevated 6,139 11.2% 5,557 10.8% Railroad 242 0.4% 285 0.6% Ferryboat 18 0.0% 14 0.0% Taxicab 20 0.0% 82 0.2% Motorcycle 298 0.5% 196 0.4% Bicycle 3,071 5.6% 3,858 7.5% Walked 8,147 14.9% 8,397 16.4% Other means 394 0.7% 367 0.7% Worked at home 3,723 6.8% 4,957 9.7% Source: Bay Area Census 5

6 SUPPLEMENTAL ITEM Page 6 of 8

Jacob, Melinda From: Subject: Zoning Adjustments Board (ZAB) FW: 2013 Second St., Use Permit #ZP2014-0061 SUPPLEMENTAL ITEM Page 7 of 8 -----Original Message----- From: Berkeley Warehouse [mailto:berkwhse@earthlink.net] Sent: Monday, April 06, 2015 8:59 AM To: Zoning Adjustments Board (ZAB) Cc: Berkeley Mayor's Office; All Council Subject: 2013 Second St., Use Permit #ZP2014-0061 Dear ZAB, With the construction of a new live/work units located at the former animal shelter on Second Street in West Berkeley, the city is planning on having 19 off-street parking spaces. Our business is located right next to the address and also directly across the street. There are two main concerns. First, where will all the on street parking be located? We know the people living in the units may have more than one vehicle and they will also have friends/family visiting, so where will they all park their cars? Our trucking company already faces major problems since our truck and trailer parking is already very difficult to get our vehicles in/out our own parking spots (all located inside our property). With the current vehicles that park on the streets, they leave no room for trucks/trailers to maneuver into our yards. What will happen when cars are parked all over the streets and on both sides of the streets, and we can't get our trucks/trailers in or out of our business? How can we service our customers and do our business as a trucking company if cars are parked all over the streets and we can't maneuver a truck/trailer in or out of our own yards? Calling the police to site and/or tow vehicles out of our way is not an option because of daily lost time would make us late to service our customers or make us late for appointments meeting cranes that unload trailers at jobsites. Waiting for police or towing parked cars is not an option! Secondly,the past several years, we have experienced severe flooding (even during this time of drought). Every time is rains hard or the city fails to keep the drains clear of debris the area floods. As a business, we have performed all preventative maintenance prior to each rainy season, yet debris from up town runs downhill and ends up flooding our streets and business. What is the city going to do for the infrastructure to make sure the area isn't in a constant fear of flooding? We hope that there is some serious thinking about the parking situation and how street parking will affect the business owners in the area. It would a sin for this to not be considered and have dire circumstances happen because this was not taken seriously. Cars constantly being towed off the streets, damaged vehicles, or daily hassles with neighbors should not be the solution because trucks/trailers and cars were not accommodated properly. Please consider the street parking impacts so neighbors can be good neighbors. Thank you. Sincerely Richard & Charlene DeVecchi Berkeley Business Owners 1

Berkeley Warehouse SUPPLEMENTAL ITEM Page 8 of 8 2