TRANSIT IDEA STRATEGIC INITIATIVE On BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT)

Similar documents
Analysis of Top BUS RAPID TRANSIT. Projects in North America SPONSORED BY APRIL 2007 METRO MAGAZINE 27

EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT

Bus Rapid Transit. Jennifer Flynn and Cheryl Thole Senior Research Associates Commuter Choice Workshop January 2012 Tampa, FL

a GAO GAO MASS TRANSIT Bus Rapid Transit Shows Promise Report to Congressional Requesters United States General Accounting Office

I-26 Fixed Guideway Alternatives Analysis

Application of IVI Technologies for Bus Rapid Transit Systems

SERVICE DESIGN GUIDELINES

Preliminary Definition of Alternatives. 3.0 Preliminary Definition of Alternatives

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study

Public Meeting. City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development

East San Fernando Valley Transit Corridor. TAC Briefing December 4, 2013

WELCOME. Transit Options Amherst - Buffalo Public Workshops

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

HOT Lanes: Congestion Relief and Better Transit

Leadership NC. November 8, 2018

Sepulveda Pass Corridor Systems Planning Study Update

What IS BRT, Really? Not BRT and RNY

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

Bi-County Transitway/ Bethesda Station Access Demand Analysis

MAGAZINE S. The U.S. and. Canada s. Top 50. Passenger Rail Projects for 2003

Bus Rapid Transit: Basic Design for Non-Transit Planners

Status of Plans March Presented by CAPITOL REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS

Executive Summary. Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Priority Corridor Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis October 13, 2009.

Service Quality: Higher Ridership: Very Affordable: Image:

Brian Pessaro, AICP National Bus Rapid Transit Institute

Chapter 4 : THEME 2. Transportation

Stakeholders Advisory Working Group Traffic and Transit Group Meeting #4, October 10, 2007

Transit Access Study

METRO Orange Line BRT American Boulevard Station Options

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study

State Safety Oversight Program

US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017

Recommendation for 2017 PSRC Funding Transportation Policy Board - June 8, 2017

Independence Institute Denver West Parkway, Suite 185 Golden, Colorado i2i.org/cad.aspx BRT = BTR

Public Meeting. June 15, :30 7:30 p.m.

Sepulveda Pass Corridor Systems Planning Study

V03. APTA Multimodal Operations Planning Workshop August Green Line LRT

Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority. Joe Calabrese - General Manager

APPENDIX I: [FIXED-GUIDEWAY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY]

Needs and Community Characteristics

Chapter 9 Recommended Locally Preferred Alternative and Alternatives for Evaluation in Draft SEIS/SEIR

CEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update

Develop ground transportation improvements to make the Airport a multi-modal regional

6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Kenosha-Racine-Milwaukee (KRM)

CTfastrak Expansion. Stakeholder Meeting #4 Manchester Town Hall June 3, 2016

The range of alternatives has been reviewed with the RTAC Subgroup and the preliminary analysis is proceeding on the following HCT alternatives:

BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY

Community Outreach Meetings

Vehicle Assist and. Bus Revenue Service

ARTERIAL BRT OVERVIEW

6/11/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

THE WILSHIRE CORRIDOR: RAIL AND ITS ALTERNATIVES. Prepared By: Jacki Murdock Transportation and Environmental Planner

PAWG Meeting #3a Tier 1 Evaluation

Chapter 7. Transportation Capital Improvement Projects. Chapter 7

New Haven Hartford Springfield Rail

METRONext. Vision & Moving Forward Plans. Board Workshop. December 11, DRAFT For Preliminary Discussion Only

Help shape your community investment in Wake Transit. Fiscal Year 2019 Draft Work Plan Summary

4.0 TIER 2 ALTERNATIVES

Northeast Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Public Involvement Round 2 Input on Alternatives for Further Study

Pacific Electric Right-of-Way / West Santa Ana Branch Corridor Alternatives Analysis

Customer Services, Operations, and Safety Committee Board Information Item III-D May 13, 2010 Rail Fleet Plan

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study

BUS RAPID TRANSIT INITIATIVE

NICTI Alternatives Analysis

Transit Connected Vehicle (CV) Research Projects Update

East San Fernando Valley Transit Corridor. Information Session, October 10, 2017

Tempe Streetcar. March 2, 2016

DRAFT Subject to modifications

Maryland Gets to Work

Top50. Passenger Rail Projects for 2007 THE U.S. AND CANADA S JUNE 2007 METRO MAGAZINE 21

Bus Rapid Transit Applications Phase 2

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MAY 5, 2016

LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (LACMTA) AND FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION (FTA)

SEPULVEDA PASS CORRIDOR

State Avenue Corridor Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)

Westchester County Department of Public Works and Transportation First and Last Mile Connections TNC Partnership Study

Metro Green Line to LAX Alternatives Analysis. March 2012

Calgary Transit and the Calgary Transportation Plan Chris Jordan, M.Sc., P.Eng. Coordinator, Strategic Transit Planning, Calgary Transit

Swift Green Line April 11, 2019

Geary Corridor Bus Rapid Transit

SamTrans Business Plan Update May 2018

The Preferred Alternative: a Vision for Growth on the Northeast Corridor

Leesburg Dulles Greenway BRT Feasibility

Smart Cities Around the Country

BRT Vehicle Development: Where Do We Go from Here?

3.15 SAFETY AND SECURITY

Measure R Funded Transit Projects

Analyzing the Impacts of Vehicle Assist and Automation Systems on BRT

Click to edit Master title style

The Implications of Automated Vehicles for the Public Transit Industry

Development and Overview of the NY 5 Bus Rapid Transit Corridor. New York State MPO Conference June 5, 2009

New Haven-Hartford-Springfield Rail Project Gateway to New England. Program Update March 14, 2011 Revised & Updated March 31, 2011

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Balancing the Transportation Needs of a Growing City

High Speed Rail Conference

The Case for. Business. investment. in Public Transportation

BUS RAPID TRAN SIT. Institute of Tra nsporta tion Engineers October 17, 2013

Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis Initial Screening Analysis

Transcription:

TRANSIT IDEA STRATEGIC INITIATIVE On BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT) The panel for the Transit IDEA program has endorsed a Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) strategic initiative and focus area as part of the Transit IDEA program. Proposers are encouraged to seek the participation of BRT Consortium agencies in developing Transit IDEA proposals and testing prototypes on BRT demonstration projects. Table 1 lists the participating transit agencies and their BRT projects. BACKGROUND The Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) program is a Federal Transit Administration (FTA) initiative to promote integrated bus-transport system concepts with customer features normally found only in rail systems, but with lower investment costs. The more advanced BRT concepts include a number of customer friendly features, such as shorter travel times through the use of exclusive guideways and priority at intersections, station stops with shorter dwell times easy access for all customers through level boarding and wider vehicle doors, prepaid fare collection, and real-time passenger information displays of next bus arrival times. To achieve the rapid feature, the BRT must have short dwell times. Shorter dwell times can be obtained with faster boarding of all customers, including those using wheelchairs. Shorter dwell times have been demonstrated for all customers with level boarding. Level boarding requires precision docking of the bus at the station. Precision docking guides the bus to a quick and safe docking at the station platform. The current U.S. methods of securing wheelchairs on buses are not compatible with the short dwell times essential for BRT. Since BRT systems are similar in many aspects to rail and automated guideway transit (AGT) systems, perhaps Americans with Disabilities (ADA) requirements and practices for BRT systems could follow the ADA 1

rail or AGT wheelchair practices. In Europe and Canada, bus customers using wheelchairs, baby strollers, or shopping carts are provided a protective compartment for a friendly and safe journey. To achieve short dwell times the BRT accommodation of passengers in wheelchairs needs to be addressed. Precision docking and level boarding with guided buses has been operational for about 10 years in Germany, using mechanical guidance technology. More recently, precision docking and level boarding has been developed using optical guidance technology, and is in revenue service in France. Electromagnetic guidance technology to achieve precision docking and level boarding was demonstrated in England in 1996, and is currently being used by service vehicles in the Eurotunnel. Both optical and magnetic technologies have been developed and demonstrated in vehicle guidance applications in the United States, and may be applicable to precision docking. Two BRT high-priority research needs have been identified by the Transit IDEA Panel for the BRT Strategic Initiative element of the Transit IDEA program. These are precision docking so that level boarding can be achieved, and an approach for wheelchair accommodations that will provides a safe, friendly, and fast journey for all BRT customers. These high-priority research needs were identified and discussed in a teleconference call with BRT Consortium agencies, FTA, and a working group of the Transit IDEA panel. The following two sections outline the research needs for these two areas, which could be addressed by potential Transit IDEA proposals. The new Strategic Initiative part of the Transit IDEA program would still rely on the basic tenets of the IDEA model, but, through strategic partnerships with organizations in the transit industry, would bring special focus to specific issues of strategic significance. FTA and BRT Consortium agencies would be involved in the partnership with the Transit IDEA program for the BRT Strategic Initiative. By testing and using methods of precision docking or of wheelchair accommodations as part of a funded BRT demonstration project, it provides for the testing and demonstration of the method and follow-on funding for deployment, as part of a larger BRT project. The BRT demonstration projects are funded with FTA capital funds and demonstration funds. 2

PRECISION DOCKING Objective The objective of this initiative is to develop and test various bus guidance systems for meeting the precision docking requirements for BRT vehicles. Requirements The following requirements should be met by the bus guidance system. 1. It must be capable of being installed on buses available for the BRT program. 2. It must be capable of reliable docking of the bus at the station platform with a horizontal gap of no greater than 3 inches (the ADA rail requirement) and ideally with a gap of no greater than 1 inch (the ADA AGT, requirement). This requirement should be met when the bus is at rest in at the station. 3. The vertical misalignment of the station platform and bus entrance level must be less than plus or minus five-eighths of an inch (the ADA rail requirement), and ideally the vertical misalignment would be less than plus or minus one-half inch (the ADA AGT requirement). This requirement should be met when the bus is at rest at the station. 4. The guidance technology must safely dock the bus at station stops. At no time during the docking and departing maneuvers should any part of the bus body contact the station platform. 5. The guidance technology must be capable of operating in temperature ranges and climates found in the BRT consortium locations. 3

WHEELCHAIR ACCOMMODATIONS Objective The objective of this initiative is to develop and test an appropriate approach for accommodating passengers using wheelchairs on BRT buses. Requirements The following requirements must be met. 1. The approach must be capable of being used on potential BRT systems. 2. The approach must provide the same level of safety required by the ADA regulations for light rail and AGT systems. 3. The approach must provide for the same number of passengers in wheelchairs as required by the ADA regulations for light rail and AGT systems. 4. The approach must accommodate the mobility devices as defined in the ADA regulations. 5. The approach must be acceptable to the wheelchair user community. 6. The approach will need to be acceptable to the FTA and the Access Board. 4

Table 1 BRT Consortium Projects and Agencies City Sponsor Description Schedule Boston, MA Massachusetts The Silver Line project consists of locally Phase 1: funded exclusive lanes on Washington Street Bay (Phase 1, Section B) (under construction and ; opening in ) connected to two tunnel Phase 2: sections: 1. South Boston Piers to Logan 2008 Airport (Phase 1, Section A)(in (MBTA) Charlotte, NC Cleveland, OH Dulles Corridor, VA Eugene- Springfield, OR City of Charlotte Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Virginia Department of Rail & Public Lane Transit District FFGA)(under construction and opening in ), and 2. Downtown Boston (Phase 2)(in Preliminary Engineering)(2008). The Silver Line will have direct transfers to MBTA s Red, Orange and Green lines and permit much faster service to Logan Airport. Independence Corridor. This project includes an exclusive busway in the median of Independence Boulevard. Approximately 2.6 miles of the busway already exists. Phase 2 will add one additional mile in 2004 and Phase 3 will potentially have a total of 13.5 miles after 2006. A corridor study is underway. GCRTA proposes to rebuild a five-mile section of Euclid Avenue by to provide for exclusive transit lanes, landscaping, transit shelters, street furniture, etc. The exclusive lanes will carry a fleet of new lowfloor articulated dual mode buses. This project is now in final design. This project, in preliminary engineering, is part of a multi-year, multi-phase effort to bring Metrorail to the corridor. The Bus Rapid Transit project phase () would be an intermediate phase to the ultimate Metrorail phase (2010). Bus Rapid Transit would operate on the congestion-free Dulles Airport Access Road and use median stations built for the Metrorail extension. A 10-mile East-West pilot corridor from east Springfield to west Eugene. LTD proposes to use exclusive lanes in a variety of configurations, limited stops, proof-ofpayment fare collection, low-floor guided buses, feeder services, park and ride, and ITS technologies. Phase 1, downtown Eugene to downtown Springfield is scheduled for and funded through the Bus Capital Program and has been approved for implementation. Phaes 2 is scheduled in 2004. LTD is expected to pursue New Starts funding for Phase 2 and subsequent phases. Phase 2: 2004; Phase 3: 2006 Phase 1: ; Phase 2: 2004 5

Hartford, CT Honolulu, HI Los Angeles, CA Miami, FL San Juan, PR Santa Clara, CA Pittsburgh, PA Albany, NY Connecticut Department of City and County of Honolulu Los Angeles County Metropolitan (LACMTA) & Los Angeles City Department of Miami-Dade Transit Agency Puerto Rico Highway and Santa Clara Valley (SCVTA) Port of Allegheny County Capital District A nine-mile, 12-station, two-lane exclusive busway is to be built on active and inactive rail rights-of-way and open in. There will be five intermediate points of access. Project is in preliminary engineering. CityExpress!, Phase 1 of Honolulu s BRT project, which started in March 1999. is a limited stop service overlayed on current local service routes running in whole or in part along the same alignment, with additional transit priority measures and improved express service stations to be added in subsequent phases. Phase 2 (In-Town BRT) and Phase 3 (Regional BRT) of Honolulu project are under consideration by FTA to initiate New Starts preliminary engineering. Rapid Bus, Los Angeles initial phase BRT project was implemented in June 2000 on two corridors: Ventura and Wilshire/Whittier Boulevards. The Rapid Bus services operates in mixed traffic but includes traffic signal preference within the City of Los Angeles, limited stops, and low floors for fast boarding. Los Angeles MTA is also seeking FTA New Starts funding for a Wilshire Boulevard BRT project with exclusive lanes and is following FTA s New Starts process for a BRT project with exclusive lanes in the San Fernando Valley corridor. MDTA proposes to extend their existing 8.5 mile South Miami-Dade Busway another 11.5 miles to Florida City by. The additional section would have 22 new stations. The project is in preliminary engineering. Fast shuttle bus service operating over HOV lanes on the new 2.5-mile Rio Hondo Connector linking the Bayamon Tren Urbano Station and the Rio Hondo Tren Urbano Plaza. The project will also include seamless fare collection with Tren Urbano, traffic signal preference, and other ITS technologies. This FFGA project is under construction and is expected to be operational in. The line 22 corridor is approximately 27 miles long and serves six Silicon Valley cities. Line 22 has a running time of over two hours. SCVTA plans to reduce travel times by 25% by route modifications, infrastructure, traffic signal preference, queue jump lanes, fare prepayment, low-floorarticulated buses, and ITS technologies. The project is expected to be operational in. The five-mile West or Airport Busway opened to service in September 2000. The West Busway was built on a former rail rightof-way and will include a new connection to downtown Pittsburgh. The Best Bus will operate on five miles of New York Route 5 between the downtowns of Albany and Schenectady. Project features traffic signal preference, infrastructure, and queue jump lanes will save ten minutes. Phase 1: 1999 Phase 2: 2004 Phase 3: 2008 Phase I Rapid Bus: 2000 2000 6

Chicago, IL Montgomery County, MD Oakland, CA Chicago Transit Montgomery County, MD Alameda- Contra Costa Transit District The X49 Western Avenue Express began operation in December 1998. The X49 uses limited stops to cut travel time by 25%. Ridership has increased by 17%. The six mile Viers Mill Road priority project will include route modifications, queue jump lanes, shoulder operations and ITS technologies. The 16 mile San Pablo corridor runs through six East Bay cities and includes a variety of bus priority improvements and vehicle and station design improvements to cut running and dwell time. 1998 7