Freight Gauge Nuances. Presented by Martin Osman 4 th November 2015

Similar documents
Requirements for the Application of Standard Vehicle Gauges

Requirements for the Application of Standard Vehicle Gauges

Requirements for the Application of Standard Vehicle Gauges

Gauging the Future: Passenger Gauge 3, Locomotive Gauge, W13

ENE Standards Committee Chairman s presentation. Presented by David Knights 25 th January 2018

EUROPEAN UNION AGENCY FOR RAILWAYS Annex 1 006REC1025 V 1.0

English version of. Executive Order on vehicles' technical compatibility with the rail network (Bekendtgørelse nr af 30. november 2012) Preface

National technical rules for vehicles Related Control Command and Signalling Requirements

Compatibility Requirements for Braking Systems of Rail Vehicles

Railway Wheelsets. Railway Group Standard GMRT2466 Issue: Four Date: December 2017

Gröna Tåget. (Eng: Green Train) Overview and Technical Aspects

GM/RC2641. Recommendations for Vehicle Static Testing. Railway Group Recommendations for GM/RT2141. Uncontrolled When Printed.

Simulation of railway track maintenance trains at MATISA

R o l l i n g S t o c k O u t l i n e s

What is model validation? Overview about DynoTRAIN WP5. O. Polach Final Meeting Frankfurt am Main, September 27, 2013

ClearRoute tm 2 Clearance gauging software

Research Brief. Simulation and verification of results from 125mph current collection modelling for two pantographs. T841 - January 2011.

Acceptance of Trams and Light Rail or Metro Vehicles for Shared Running on Railtrack Controlled Infrastructure

Switch design optimisation: Optimisation of track gauge and track stiffness

Rapid Response. Lineside Signal Spacing. Railway Group Standard GK/RT0034 Issue Three Date September 1998

Track friendly vehicles - principles, advantages. Sebastian Stichel August 8, 2007

Simulation of a Narrow Gauge Vehicle using SIMPACK, Model Validation using Scaled Prototypes on Roller-Rig

Council of the European Union Brussels, 18 July 2014 (OR. en)

Applicable standards in HS Infrastructure subsystem TSI (2008/217/EC)

European Railway Agency

Guidance Note: The Design and Construction of Freight Wagons

AutoTrack Rail Brochure

A comparative analysis of the performance of heavy vehicle combinations from OECD member countries by computer simulation.

Basics of Vehicle Truck and Suspension Systems and Fundamentals of Vehicle Steering and Stability

Standards Manager Web Standards List RSSB-Rail Safety and Standards Board

SIMPACK User Meeting May 2011 in Salzburg

Resistance of Railway Vehicles to Derailment and Roll-Over

Standardized Technical Specification. Bi-Level Passenger Rail Cars for Intercity Corridor Service. Chapter 5. Trucks. Revision H

(Text with EEA relevance)

Track Circuit Assister Configuration for Rail Vehicles

Interface between Rail Vehicle Weights and Underline Bridges

Rolling Stock Subsystem and Interfaces to AC Energy Subsystem

Influence of Kink Protection Systems on a Tram Passing Through Curve

Payload optimization of articulated wagons regarding train length and vehicle dynamic behaviour

Risk Management of Rail Vehicle Axle Bearings

INTEROPERABILITY UNIT

Deviation from a Railway Group Standard

2. Test Centre VUZ Velim Cerhenice

Engineering Design of On-Track Machines in Running Mode

SECTION 8 RAIL FREIGHT VEHICLE UNDERFRAME AND BODY STRUCTURES

Vehicle functional design from PSA in-house software to AMESim standard library with increased modularity

Aerodynamic Drag Assessment

Permissible Track Forces for Railway Vehicles

SPMM OUTLINE SPECIFICATION - SP20016 issue 2 WHAT IS THE SPMM 5000?

Study Group WAGON USERS Groupe d Etudes UTILISATEURS WAGONS Studiengruppe WAGENVERWENDER

Council of the European Union Brussels, 18 July 2014 (OR. en)

Weight Allowance Reduction for Quad-Axle Trailers. CVSE Director Decision

Rail Industry Standard for the Design of On- Track Machines in Travelling and Working Modes

Compatibility Between Electric Trains and Electrification Systems

INTEROPERABILITY UNIT TRANS-EUROPEAN CONVENTIONAL RAIL SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM ENERGY

Development of a Multibody Systems Model for Investigation of the Effects of Hybrid Electric Vehicle Powertrains on Vehicle Dynamics.

Introduction. Cent re-bearing longitudinal movement in transitions due to track twist loads; \ 1

Future Power Technologies

Simulation of freight train during braking operation using SIMPACK

Guide for the application of the CR WAG TSI

COUNTY ROAD SPEED LIMITS. Policy 817 i

REDUCING THE OCCURRENCES AND IMPACT OF FREIGHT TRAIN DERAILMENTS

Locomotive Hauled Passenger Vehicle Specific Interface Requirements WOS

QUESTION / CLARIFICATION

Guide for the application of the WAG TSI

CONCEPTION, APPROVAL AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE HAULMARK STEERING A-DOUBLE AN AUSTRALIAN PERFORMANCE BASED STANDARDS (PBS) CASE STUDY

SPMM OUTLINE SPECIFICATION - SP20016 issue 2 WHAT IS THE SPMM 5000?

UIC brake pad certification

ZWISCHENSTAATLICHE ORGANISATION FÜR DEN INTERNATIONALEN EISENBAHNVERKEHR INTERGOVERNMENTAL ORGANISATION FOR INTERNATIONAL CARRIAGE BY RAIL

DESIGN PRACTICE NOTE MOBILITY VEHICLE SIMULATIONS AT PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS

Vehicle Dynamic Simulation Using A Non-Linear Finite Element Simulation Program (LS-DYNA)

The goal of the study is to investigate the effect of spring stiffness on ride height and aerodynamic balance.

The SUSTRAIL high speed freight vehicle: Simulation of novel running gear design

APPENDIX 16 TO THE GENERAL CONTRACT OF USE FOR WAGONS WAGON VEHICLE DATA

COUNTY ROAD SPEED LIMITS. Policy 817 i

Resistance of Railway Vehicles to Overturning in Gales

INVESTIGATION OF A 9-AXLE CONFIGURATION FOR LOG-HAULING IN BRITISH COLUMBIA

Modification of IPG Driver for Road Robustness Applications

INTEROPERABILITY UNIT

Branding of Wheels,Tyres and Axles

Guidelines for Granting of Exemption Permits for the Conveyance of Abnormal Loads

Equipotential Bonding of Rail Vehicles to Running Rail Potential

Rail Industry Standard for 750 V and 1500 V DC Overhead Lines and corresponding Rolling Stock requirements

CHAPTER 4 : RESISTANCE TO PROGRESS OF A VEHICLE - MEASUREMENT METHOD ON THE ROAD - SIMULATION ON A CHASSIS DYNAMOMETER

Evaluation study on Speed Limitation Devices. Scenarios and methodology Stakeholder conference 10 June 2013

TRACK FRIENDLINESS OF AN INNOVATIVE FREIGHT BOGIE

SPECIALIST DRIVING KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS Demonstrate knowledge of operating a light four wheel drive (4WD) vehicle in an off-road environment

INTEROPERABILITY UNIT FRICTION ELEMENTS FOR WHEEL TREAD BRAKES FOR FREIGHT WAGONS

ANALYZING THE DYNAMICS OF HIGH SPEED RAIL

Schenck Process has been at home in the rail business for many years. Innovative, precise, proven and with the best references.

CLASSIFICATION NOTES. Type Testing Procedure for. Crankcase Explosion Relief Valves

Potential of Intelligent Transport Systems to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in road freight transport

Official Journal L 104. of the European Union. Legislation. Non-legislative acts. Volume April English edition. Contents REGULATIONS

MCS. Important Information on MCS 012 Issue 2.1 for MCS Solar Photovoltaic and Solar Thermal Contractors. Last Updated: 25 th September 2017

Results of HCT- vehicle combinations

Research Brief. Feasibility study into raising and lowering pantographs while trains are in motion. T778 - July Overview. Aims.

for TECHNICAL ADVICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AGENCY FOR RAILWAYS THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION regarding ERA/AD V/ running gear - design of structural

HYBRID TESTING METHOD TO PROVE THE COMPLIANCE OF HEAVY VEHICLES

Interrelation between Wavelengths of Track Geometry Irregularities and Rail Vehicle Dynamic Properties

LLC «Сenturion XXI st century» Limited Liability Company

Transcription:

Freight Gauge Nuances Presented by Martin Osman 4 th November 2015

Introduction What s new in the field of freight gauging? Established or Benchmark suspension Standard Vehicle Gauge Data sheets (SVGD) New - W10a gauge Withdrawn W11 and W7-W9Plus lower gauges Considering cross-winds (T1031) 2

Established or Benchmark suspension What do we mean when we say Established Suspension Or Benchmark Suspension? 3

Established or Benchmark suspension GE/RT8073 Issue 3 sets out the definition: Established suspension A suspension which has traditionally been used for vehicles conforming to a particular standard vehicle gauge, and whose characteristics have been used by the infrastructure manager to demonstrate that a route is clear for the particular standard vehicle gauge. Suspension types for use with W6a: 3 piece. Y series. LTF (low track force). TF (track friendly). Swing motion. AM3 (axle motion). BR long link. Friction pedestal. UIC double link suspension. 4

Established or Benchmark suspension GE/RT8073 Issue 3 sets out the definition: Benchmark suspension A suspension for which 8073SVGD is available. It can be used to demonstrate compliance with a standard gauge or clearance to infrastructure with greater accuracy than established suspensions. Suspension types for use with W6a: 3 Piece. Y25. Y33. Y33c. Swing motion. LTF13 5

Established or Benchmark suspension Why have we made the distinction between the two? To provide clearer criteria for new suspension / bogie designs To continue to provide for existing wagons (Grandfather rights) and hopefully reduce costs of gauging analysis To move away from wagon specific gauging compatibility To help to provide for new designs of more track friendly bogies 6

Established or Benchmark suspension How do we add a suspension / bogie type to the Benchmark list? Carry out a dynamic analysis as described in RIS-2773-RST Validated vehicle model Recognised Multi-Body Simulation software package Complete a Vehicle Gauging Data (VGD) workbook Range of vehicle speeds over a range of installed cants Tare and Laden loading condition Curving analysis (to determine wheelset position) Compare movement data to existing Benchmark suspensions Movements shall be within the existing envelope for all cases A Research proposal has been put together to develop the methodology (issues concerning vehicle mass, C of G height and model validation) 7

Established or Benchmark suspension Example of current Benchmark vehicle movements 8

Established or Benchmark suspension What if the new suspension movements exceed the current Benchmarks? If the body bounces 10 mm too high reduce the body height by 10 mm If the body sways 15 mm too much at the top corner reduce the top corner width by 15 mm What about Containers? We cant width reduce Containers! Consider fixing arrangements? There is always a logical solution! 9

Standard Vehicle Gauge Data sheets (SVGD) The Standard Vehicle Gauge Data (8073SVGD) should be used to calculate the dynamic movements and the resultant swept envelope, to support gauging studies The Data for many established suspensions for freight W gauges is available on the RSSB website 10

Standard Vehicle Gauge Data sheets (SVGD) What are the benefits of using the SVGD worksheets? Simplicity If you are using an Established or Benchmark suspension then you simply have to check that the vehicle fits within the static gauge Reduced costs The dynamic movements have already been determined so further dynamic modelling is not required If you are not using an Established or Benchmark suspension a methodology for demonstrating compliance is provided. David Johnson is discussing RIS-2773-RST in the next presentation 11

New - W10a Gauge What is the purpose of the W10a gauge? W10a gauge is a load gauge carried on lower gauge compliant wagons. It was developed to define the maximum size of a load that may be carried on wagons with a deck height of between 820 mm and 995 mm with a maximum bogie spacing (or axle spacing) of 14.020 m and a bogie wheelbase of between 1.8 m and 2.2 m. W10a gauge was developed to accommodate 9' 6" x 2500 mm container traffic on a wider range of bogie types. The gauge is simply a square box with the following co-ordinates: Point X (mm) Y (mm) 1 1262.5 820 2 1262.5 3891 12

New - W10a Gauge What is the difference between W10 and W10a? The difference is the suspension / bogie types that can be used. The W10 gauge is specifically for use with: Y25 Y33 The W10a gauge can be used with all Benchmark suspensions. W10a Static Gauge The gauges are almost the same but the dynamic swept envelopes differ! 13

Withdrawn - W11 and W7 - W9Plus lower gauges Why have the gauges been withdrawn? The W11 gauge No routes had been cleared to it Industry consultation agreed no use for it The W7 W9Plus lower gauges The new Lower Sector Vehicle Gauge (LSVG) has replaced them Industry consultation agreed to reduce the No. of lower gauges The Industry is encouraged to use the LSVG! 14

Considering cross-winds We have a long standing requirement to assess the effects of cross-wind, but how do we carry out the assessment? GE/RT8073 Issue 3 now sets out the requirement for assessing the effects of cross-wind for W10, W10a and the W12 gauges: For the W10, W10a and W12 gauge, if the vehicle does not use an established or benchmark suspension, it is permissible to declare the vehicle to be compliant with the upper dynamic gauge if it can be demonstrated that, in all conditions of speed, cant and side wind loading, its swept envelope remains within that of a vehicle or vehicles with a benchmark suspension conforming to the required standard vehicle gauge. Following the conclusion of research project T1031, GE/GN8573 now provides a detailed methodology for carrying out the cross-wind assessment. 15

Considering cross-winds Methodology: The swept envelope is calculated using a multibody simulation (MBS) dynamic model for the wagon travelling at a range of speeds up to maximum speed over a range of installed track cants. The swept envelope calculations are repeated for a range of 10 minute mean cross-wind speeds. 16

Considering cross-winds Specific Wagon body aerodynamic coefficients are supplied b C Fy C Fz C Mx 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 10 0.172 0.033 0.104 20 0.392 0.175 0.242 30 0.789 0.261 0.487 40 1.140 0.279 0.696 50 1.223 0.224 0.740 60 1.187 0.177 0.725 70 1.220 0.185 0.751 80 1.236 0.142 0.765 90 1.225 0.109 0.758 The calculation details are provided in GM/RT2173 and are the same as used for calculating pantograph sway 17

Considering cross-winds We need to avoid this But that is going beyond gauging! 18

Future??? 19

Thank you