Georgia Transmission Corporation Georgia Systems Operations Corporation

Similar documents
Feasibility Study Report

Reactive Power Compensation for Solar Power Plants. Andy Leon IEEE PES Chicago Chapter December 12 th, 2018

System Impact Study Report

Consulting Agreement Study. Completed for Transmission Customer

Interconnection System Impact Study Report Request # GI

Feasibility Study Report

Essential Reliability Services From PV Plants

AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER 2017 FILING FERC FORM 715 ANNUAL TRANSMISSION PLANNING AND EVALUATION REPORT PART 4 TRANSMISSION PLANNING RELIABILITY CRITERIA

Ancillary Services & Essential Reliability Services

Generator Interconnection Facilities Study For SCE&G Two Combustion Turbine Generators at Hagood

Terry Blackwell Page 1 of 5. Education North Carolina State University BS, Electrical Engineering Power Systems emphasis

Feasibility Study Report

MILLIGAN SOLAR PROJECT

Request for Payment Instructions Wholesale Distribution Access Tariff (WDAT) Attachment I - GIP

Interconnection Feasibility Study Report GIP-226-FEAS-R3

EL PASO ELECTRIC COMPANY (EPE) FACILITIES STUDY FOR PROPOSED HVDC TERMINAL INTERCONNECTION AT NEW ARTESIA 345 KV BUS

DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PLANNING SUMMARY

Evaluation of the Performance of Back-to-Back HVDC Converter and Variable Frequency Transformer for Power Flow Control in a Weak Interconnection

Operational Opportunities to Minimize Renewables Curtailments

PLANNING, ELIGIBILITY FOR CONNECTION AND CONNECTION PROCEDURE IN EMBEDDED GENERATION

PJM Generator Interconnection R81 Emilie (Fords Mill) MW Impact Study Re-Study

Level 2, Level 3 & Level 4 Interconnection Request Application Form (Greater than 25 kw to 10 MVA or less)

Generating Unit Model Validation Policy

CHAPTER 5 FAULT AND HARMONIC ANALYSIS USING PV ARRAY BASED STATCOM

Essential Reliability Services Engineering the Changing Grid

Managing California s Electrical Supply System after the shut down of San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station

Project #148. Generation Interconnection System Impact Study Report

THE NECESSITY OF THE 500 KV SYSTEM IN NWE S TRANSMISSION SYSTEM TO MAINTAIN RELIABLE SERVICE TO MONTANA CUSTOMERS

Generation Interconnection Feasibility Study For XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX MW generator at new Western Refinary Substation

APPENDIX I: Description and Functional Specifications for Transmission Facilities Eligible for Competitive Solicitation

PJM Generator Interconnection Request Queue #R60 Robison Park-Convoy 345kV Impact Study September 2008

Interconnection Feasibility Study Report Request # GI Draft Report 600 MW Wind Generating Facility Missile Site 230 kv Substation, Colorado

Relative Power Factor Correction costs

Distributed Energy Resources

February 13, Docket No. ER ; ER Response to Request for Additional Information

Essential Reliability Services From PV Plants

New 115 kv Disconnect Switches at Bloomsburg MTS

Large Scale Solar Integration

MILESTONE SUMMARY REPORT Project funding provided by customers of Xcel Energy through a grant from the Renewable Development Fund

PV Grid Integration Research in the U.S.

Distributed Generation Interconnection Policy

Proposed New ISO Rules Section Version 2.0 Generating Unit Technical Requirements ( New ISO Rules Section Version 2.

Request for Payment Instructions Rule 21 Export Submittal Instructions

SYSTEM IMPACT STUDY EC300W ERIS FINAL REPORT. El Paso Electric Company

PSNH INTERCONNECTION REQUEST

Supplemental Report on the NCTPC Collaborative Transmission Plan

A member-consumer with a QF facility shall not participate in the Cooperative s electric heat rate program.

PID 274 Feasibility Study Report 13.7 MW Distribution Inter-Connection Buras Substation

Generator Interconnection System Impact Study For

Consumer Guidelines for Electric Power Generator Installation and Interconnection

El PASO ELECTRIC COMPANY 2014 BULK ELECTRIC SYSTEM TRANSMISSION ASSESSMENT FOR YEARS

Electrical grid stability with high wind energy penetration

Industry Recommendation Loss of Solar Resources during Transmission Disturbances due to Inverter Settings - II

NERC-led Review Panel Decision on the Request of City of Pasadena Water and Power

Hybrid Wind Solar Generator

ATTACHMENT Y STUDY REPORT

DEMONSTRATION OF ESSENTIAL RELIABILITY SERVICES BY A 300-MW SOLAR PV POWER PLANT

SPS Planning Criteria and Study Methodology

C PER. Center for Advanced Power Engineering Research C PER

CUSTOMER/ TWIN ARROWS PROJECT

Gateway South Transmission Project

Rider : NET METERING SERVICE AND ELECTRICAL SYSTEM INTEGRATION

SPP OVERVIEW. Mike Ross Senior Vice President, Government Affairs and Public Relations

SYSTEM IMPACT RESTUDY H252W ERIS REPORT. El Paso Electric Company

Falcon-Midway 115 kv Line Uprate Project Report

Dynamic Control of Grid Assets

The Power Potential Project A guide to participating

TRANSMISSION PLANNING CRITERIA

Level 2, Level 3 & Level 4 Interconnection Request Application Form (Greater than 10 kva to 10 MVA or less)

Dynamic Control of Grid Assets

Research on Transient Stability of Large Scale Onshore Wind Power Transmission via LCC HVDC

Interconnection Feasibility Study Report GIP-222-FEAS-R3

Springfield Utility Board Net Metering Policy Adopted on February 13, 2008 (Resolution 08-1)

Impact of Distributed Energy Resources on Transmission System Reliability

An Introduction to Completing a NERC PRC Study

Ancillary Services. Horace Horton Senior Market Trainer, Market Training, NYISO. New York Market Orientation Course (NYMOC)

Southern Company Interconnection Process. Dexter Lewis Research Engineer Research and Technology Management

Electric Transportation and Energy Storage

Kansas Legislature. Briefing for the. March 6, Paul Suskie & Mike Ross

WIRES University Overview of ISO/RTOs. Mike Ross Senior Vice President Government Affairs and Public Relations Southwest Power Pool

Renewable and Distributed Energy Resource Technologies

RULE STATIONARY GAS TURBINES Adopted (Amended , ) INDEX

NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS in TURKISH POWER SYSTEM TURKISH DELEGATION

1.Power System Infrastructure

Guideline on Energy Storage

Experience on Technical Solutions for Grid Integration of Offshore Windfarms

SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICT E-27 CUSTOMER GENERATION PRICE PLAN FOR RESIDENTIAL SERVICE

Experience with Model Validation of PV Power Plants. Abraham Ellis, Ryan Elliott, Ray Byrne Sandia National Laboratories

NRECA Cooperative Research Network. Modern Grid Initiative Southeast Summit August 10, 2006 Nashville, TN

Interconnection Feasibility Study Report GIP-023-FEAS-R1. Generator Interconnection Request # MW Wind Generating Facility Inverness (L6549), NS

ABB POWER SYSTEMS CONSULTING

Guideline for Parallel Grid Exit Point Connection 28/10/2010

Grid Integration Costs: Impact of The IRP Capacity Mix on System Operations

NATIONAL CONFERENCE of STATE LEGISLATURES. October 9 th, 2009 Ervan Hancock

NORTHEAST NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT RATE SCHEDULE LP-2 Large Power Service. Effective: For bills rendered on and after February 1, 2019.

Voltage Control Strategies for Distributed Generation

NORTHEAST NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT RATE SCHEDULE LP-2 Large Power Service. Effective: For bills rendered on and after January 1, 2014.

Transmission Coordination and Planning Committee 2016 Q4 Stakeholder Meeting

The Application of Power Electronics to the Alberta Grid

Overview of ISO New England and the New England Wholesale Power Markets

Transcription:

Georgia Transmission Corporation Georgia Systems Operations Corporation Reactive Power Requirements for Generating Facilities Interconnecting to the Georgia Integrated Transmission System with Georgia Transmission Corporation (Reference IA Appendix C-4A) INTRODUCTION Voltage must be controlled to protect the transmission system and move power where it is needed. This control tends to be local in nature, such as at transmission substations and in areas of lower voltage transmission nodes. Ensuring sufficient voltage control of the transmission system is important both for normal operations and for events impacting normal operations (i.e., disturbances). Generators provide critical reactive power (dynamic) that regulates local voltage and are necessary to maintain the reliability of the transmission system. Georgia Transmission Corporation (GTC) has established the following reactive power requirement guideline based on consultation with the Georgia Integrated Transmission System ('ITS') Participants 1 and the Transmission System Operators 2. This reactive power requirement guideline is, in general, consistent with industry practices and the regional requirements of the Transmission System Operators 3. Reactive requirements for individual generating facilities are stipulated in the INTERCONNECTION AND OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT BETWEEN GENERATOR AND GEORGIA TRANSMISSION CORPORATION (AN ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORPORATION) FOR THE GENERATOR PLANT PROJECT ( Interconnection Agreement ). A. GENERATING FACILIITES INTERCONNECTED ABOVE 100kV For generating facilities interconnecting to the transmission system above 100 kv, the reactive power capability policy is that the generator owners are required to design the generating facility to maintain a voltage schedule at the point of interconnection and a composite power delivery at Continuous, Rated MW Output at the Point of Interconnection at a power factor within the minimum range of 0.95 leading to 0.95 lagging at the high side of the generator substation. Consistent with that practice, GTC has developed the following: (i) procedures for analyzing the minimum acceptable reactive power capability; and 1 ITS Participants are Georgia Power Company, MEAG Power, Dalton Utilities, and GTC 2 Transmission Operators include Southern Transmission (SBA), Georgia Control Center, and Georgia System Operations Corporation http://www.oasis.oati.com/soco/socodocs/reactive-power-policy.pdf 3 http://www.oasis.oati.com/soco/socodocs/reactive-power-policy.pdf 4 See Appendix A for definitions of Continuous, Rated MW Output Page 1

(ii) operating requirements for reactive power support; for interconnecting generating facilities. 1. Procedures for Analyzing Minimum Acceptable Reactive Power Capability for Generators Connected to the Transmission System (100 kv and above) At Continuous, Rated MW Output (for summer peak conditions), calculations performed by Georgia Transmission Corporation must show that the interconnecting generating facility shall have the capability of supplying at least 0.33 MVArs (dynamic VArs) into the transmission system for each MW supplied at the high side of the generator substation when the transmission system bus voltage at the interconnection point is at the specified test voltage. This corresponds to a maximum power factor of 0.95 lagging. The test is performed at the following interconnection point voltage levels: From 100 kv through 161 kv connected units - 1.00 pu 230 kv connected units - 1.01 pu 500 kv connected units - 1.02 pu The generating facility shall also be capable (at Continuous, Rated MW Output) of absorbing 0.33 MVArs (dynamic VArs) from the transmission system for each MW supplied at the high side of the generator substation. This corresponds to a maximum power factor of 0.95 leading. The test is performed at the following interconnection point voltage levels: From 100 kv through 161 kv connected units - 1.03 pu 230 kv connected units - 1.04 pu 500 kv connected units - 1.05 pu Peaking generation (e.g., simple cycle combustion turbines and other units that would typically be dispatched only during peak load periods) may be exempted from the MVAr absorption requirement on a case-by-case basis. The calculations made to test the reactive capability requirements set forth above include the allowable range of generator bus voltages considering station service load if it is fed from the generator bus as well as the GSU (generator step up transformer) tap setting. The generating facility must meet both the VAr production and VAr absorption requirements on the selected GSU tap setting. For GSU s which do not have a test report available, the manufacturing tolerance for the impedance will be taken into account in the calculations. If the reactive capability test shows that, after modeling the full range of the generator reactive power, the generator is not capable of meeting the reactive requirements, the generator owner must provide additional dynamic reactive Page 2

power compensation. GTC will consider static reactive power compensation only as an addition to the full range of generator reactive power and on a case-bycase basis. 2. Operating Requirements for Reactive Power Support for Generators Connected to the Transmission System (100 kv and above) When a generating facility is delivering power to the Georgia Integrated Transmission System (100 kv and above), the generator owner shall operate its generators to meet its voltage schedule as determined by GTC. The voltage will be measured at the Point of Interconnection with the transmission system as defined in the Interconnection Agreement. If the generating facility does not maintain its scheduled voltage, the generator owner, upon the request of Georgia System Operations Corporation 5 must explain its inability to comply. Georgia System Operations Corporation will deem the generating facility to have been in compliance with the reactive power requirements if one of the following conditions is met: (i) (ii) Maintained voltage was below the required scheduled voltage. If system conditions occurred that prevented the generating facility from maintaining the voltage schedule and the generator owner demonstrated that the generating facility maximized its MVAr supply. Maintained voltage exceeded the required schedule voltage. If system conditions occurred that prevented the generator from maintaining voltage schedule and the generator owner demonstrated that the generating facility maximized its MVAr absorption. (iii) Georgia System Operations Corporation had requested a modified GSU tap setting. Georgia System Operations Corporation requested the generating facility to operate on a GSU tap which made the reactive requirement of the generating facility different from a production value of 0.33 times rated MW and an absorption value of 0.33 times rated MW. The generator owner must have demonstrated that the generating facility provided its maximum MVAr production or absorption in an effort to meet the required voltage schedule. When a modified GSU tap setting is requested, Georgia System Operations Corporation will determine the adjusted minimum requirements and provide them to the generator owner. 5 For purposes of this document, the term Georgia System Operations Corporation shall mean Georgia System Operations Corporation, Southern Companies, or Georgia Transmission Corporation s transmission operator, transmission owner and transmission planner, as appropriate Page 3

If Georgia System Operations Corporation determines that the generating facility did not comply with these requirements, appropriate actions, in accordance with NERC Standards and/or the IA, may be taken. When a generating facility is on-line, the full reactive capacity of the generator(s) is expected to be available to the transmission system whether it is generating at reduced MW or at its Continuous, Rated MW Output. If the generating facility is temporarily operating above Continuous, Rated MW Output, it must reduce to the Continuous, Rated MW Output when requested by Georgia System Operations Corporation if that is necessary for the generator(s) to produce the amount of MVArs required to meet the required voltage schedule. Generator owners which have their generating facility s reactive capability limited by an equipment failure or operating problem should advise Georgia System Operations Corporation and correct the situation as soon as possible. An exception to the requirement of holding a scheduled voltage on the transmission grid may be given to co-generation facilities that have significant customer load served from the generator bus. These types of facilities will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. 3. CONSEQUENCES OF NOT FULFILLING ABOVE REQUIREMENTS In the event a generating facility subject to these procedures and requirements does not comply with the supply of reactive power support in accordance with the aforementioned requirements, such action will be considered a material breach of the interconnection agreement and appropriate action will be taken. 4. APPLICABILITY All interconnection requests for new generators submitted to GTC on or after April 1, 2017 are subject to the terms and conditions of these reactive power procedures and requirements. Generators with an Interconnection Agreement with Georgia Transmission Corporation are subject to applicable reactive power procedures and requirements of the Interconnection Agreement. B. GENERATING FACILITIES INTERCONNECTED TO SUB-TRANSMISSION (Greater than 40 kv and below 100 kv) For generating facilities interconnecting to the sub-transmission system (greater than 40 kv and below 100 kv), reactive power capability policy is that the generator owners are required to design the generating facility to maintain a composite power delivery at Continuous, Rated MW Output at the high side of the generator substation at a scheduled power factor within the minimum range of 0.95 leading to 0.95 lagging (0.95 or less leading and 0.95 or less lagging). Page 4

1. Procedures for Analyzing Minimum Acceptable Reactive Power Capability for Generators Connected to the Sub-Transmission System (greater than 40 kv and below than 100 kv) At Continuous, Rated MW Output (for summer peak conditions), calculations performed by Georgia Transmission Corporation must show that the interconnecting generating facility have the capability of supplying, into the subtransmission system, at least 0.33 MVArs (dynamic VArs) for each MW supplied at the high side of the generator substation. This corresponds to a power factor 0.95 or less lagging. The generating facility shall also be capable (at Continuous, Rated MW Output) of absorbing, from the sub-transmission system, 0.33 MVArs (dynamic VArs) for each MW supplied at the high side of the generator substation. This corresponds to a power factor 0.95 or less leading. If the reactive capability test shows that, after modeling the full range of the generator reactive power, the generator is not capable of meeting the reactive requirements, the generator owner must provide additional dynamic reactive power compensation. GTC will consider static reactive power compensation only as an addition to the full range of generator reactive power capability and on a case-by-case basis. 2. Operating Requirements for Reactive Power Support for Generators Connected to the Sub-Transmission System (greater than 40 kv and below than 100 kv) When a generating facility is delivering power to the Georgia Integrated Transmission System at the sub-transmission level (greater than 40 kv and below 100 kv), the generator owner shall operate its generators to meet its fixed power factor as determined by GTC. The power factor will be measured at the Point of Interconnection with the subtransmission system as defined in the Interconnection Agreement. If the generating facility does not maintain its fixed power factor as determined by GTC, the generator owner, upon the request of Georgia System Operations Corporation 6 must explain its inability to comply. Georgia System Operations Corporation will deem the generating facility to have been in compliance with the reactive power requirements if one of the following conditions is met: 6 For purposes of this document, the term Georgia System Operations Corporation shall mean Georgia System Operations Corporation, Southern Companies, or Georgia Transmission Corporation s transmission operator, transmission owner and transmission planner, as appropriate Page 5

(i) Maintained power factor lagging (VAr supply) exceeded the required scheduled power factor. If system conditions occurred that prevented the generating facility from maintaining the power factor and the generator owner demonstrated that the generating facility maximized its MVAr supply. (ii) Maintained power factor leading (VAr absorption) exceeded the required scheduled power factor. If system conditions occurred that prevented the generator from maintaining the power factor and the generator owner demonstrated that the generating facility maximized its MVAr absorption. (iii) Georgia System Operations Corporation had requested a modified GSU tap setting. Georgia System Operations Corporation requested the generating facility to operate on a GSU tap which made the reactive requirement of the generating facility different from a production value of 0.33 times rated MW and an absorption value of 0.33 times rated MW. The generator owner must have demonstrated that the generating facility provided its maximum MVAr production or absorption in an effort to meet the required voltage schedule. When a modified GSU tap setting is requested, Georgia System Operations Corporation will determine the adjusted minimum requirements and provide them to the generator owner. Page 6

Appendix A Definition of Generator Continuous, Rated MW Output The purpose of this appendix is to define the term "Continuous, Rated MW Output" for the various generator types. All resources connected to the Georgia Integrated Transmission System are required to comply with NERC and SERC schedules and criteria for demonstrating generator MW capability. 1. Coal, nuclear, oil and gas facilities: These electric generator types are turbine generators which have steam power as their prime mover. For these facilities the term "Continuous, Rated MW Output" shall mean the generating facility's full load MW capability expected to be available continuously on a daily basis under normal operating conditions during June - August, when all generators of this type residing at the plant are demonstrating concurrently. 2. Combustion turbine and combined cycle facilities: These electric generator types are turbine generators which have fuel/air mixtures expanded through combustion as the prime mover for the combustion turbine and, in the case of combined cycle facilities, exhaust heat recovery steam generation as a prime mover for the steam turbine. For these facilities the term "Continuous, Rated MW Output" shall mean the generating facility's full MW capability expected to be available continuously on a daily basis under normal operating conditions during June - August, when all generators of this type residing at the plant are demonstrating concurrently. 3. Conventional and pumped storage hydro facilities: These electric generator types are turbine generators which have water as their prime mover. For these facilities the term "Continuous, Rated MW Output" shall mean the generating facility's full load efficient gate MW capability expected to be available continuously for eight hours during five continuous weekdays of the June - August peak season, when all generators of this type residing at the plant are demonstrating concurrently. Simulated operation using an acceptable hydro production modeling program which utilizes at least thirty years of hydro flow data may be used in the demonstrated rating process. 4. Solar and wind facilities: These non-synchronous electric generator types are inverter-based generators which have variable non-dispatchable energy input. For these facilities the term "Continuous, Rated MW Output" shall mean the generating facility's peak load MW capability at the high-side of the generator substation expected to be available on a daily basis under normal operating conditions during June - August. Page 7