Santiago BUS-DPF-Retrofit Swiss Contributions and Lessons of the Pilot Project Andreas Mayer / TTM

Similar documents
Experience with 7000 Particle Filter Retrofits onroad and offroad in Switzerland. Andreas Mayer / TTM

Solid Particle Emissions of HDV Euro 3 DPF Euro 4 PM-Kat Euro 5 SCR

Effects of Diesel Particle Filters on Performance of In-Use Buses

Methodology and Practice

Retrofit Program of a EURO 1 & EURO 2 Urban Bus Fleet in La Rochelle: Status after One Year Experience

Methodology and Practice

Global Emission Solution. Cool Particulate Regeneration (CPR )

The new Iran Heavy Duty Diesel Environmental Regulation

NPTI APPROACHES FOR DENO X -SYSTEMS. Dr. J. Czerwinski, AFHB Dr. A. Mayer, TTM Th. Lutz, ETHZ

VERT-Suggestions for «post Euro 6»

Influence of Diesel Particle Filter on Ultrafine Particle Emissions from In- Use Buses of Different Generations

AECC/Concawe 2016 GPF RDE PN Test Programme: PN Measurement Above and Below 23nm

Catalytic Coatings for Diesel Particulate Filter Regeneration

Performance Evaluation of FBC-DPF Using PEMS

Internal Combustion Engines

Technology Choices. New Bus Purchases Fleet Make-up Engine Models & Years Driver Education & Support Duty Cycles Fuel Use & Storage

EXPERIENCES ABOUT NO 2

DETERMINATION OF A PRECONDITIONING PROTOCOL TO STABILIZE NOx AND PN EMISSIONS FOR EURO 6 ENGINE CERTIFICATION

DPF TROUBLESHOOTING DIAGNOSIS AND REMEDY

BCEMS SINO Swiss & VERT Final Meeting Oct.15./

The Potential of DPF Technology for the Elimination of Diesel Soot

Future Challenges in Automobile and Fuel Technologies For a Better Environment. Diesel WG Report. September 25, 2000

Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. Robust Low-cost EPA-Verified Systems for for Diesel Retrofit on on Heavy Duty Vehicles

Automotive Particle Emissions: an update of regulatory Euro 6/VI and UNECE developments

Periodic Technical Inspection to Control Emission of Pollutant

RETROFITTING OF URBAN BUSES IN ISRAEL WITH PARTICULATE TRAPS FIRST RESULTS

UPDATE PTI PROCEDURE FOR DPF TESTING

GRPE/HDH Engine-Base Emissions Regulation using HILS for Commercial Hybrid Vehicles JASIC

Jon Andersson, Ricardo UK Ltd. Edinburgh, January 24 th Ricardo plc 2015

First results of vehicle technology effects on sub-23nm exhaust particle number emissions using the DownTo10 sampling and measurement system

Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine Trends to Meet Future Emissions Standards (Euro VI)

Real Driving Emissions and Test Cycle Data from 4 Modern European Vehicles

Fuel Borne Catalysts

Paper-Abstract Form. Title: Reduction of exhaust nanoparticles by retrofitted after-treatment systems in diesel passenger cars

Overview of HD Diesel Emission Control. Tim Johnson May 22, 2008

Real Driving Emissions

Particulate Emissions from Mopeds: Effect of Lubricant and Fuel

Strategies for Integrated Emission Control. Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc 1

The Path To EPA Tier 4i - Preparing for. the 2011 transition

INTRODUCTION TO NEAR TERM TECHNOLOGIES FOR LD DIESEL EFFICIENCY

Installation Guide Diesel Particulate Filters with DiNLOG Monitoring System

Case Study 1 - Reducing Exhaust Particulates from Buses

Roll out of SCR on Filter..

Contribution of Gasoline Particulate Filter (GPF) and Lubricant to the TGDi System Solution

NO 2 Emissions from Exhaust Aftertreatment Technology

Black Carbon Emissions From Diesel Engines - Technical And Policy Options For Reduction. Dr Richard O Sullivan 22 March 2012

THE RIGHT TECHNOLOGY. The Best Route to Euro 4

The particle-nox trade-off: Two decades of diesel converter technologies have not settled both issues

EVALUATION OF THE EUROPEAN PMP METHODOLOGIES USING CHASSIS DYNAMOMETER AND ON-ROAD TESTING OF HEAVY- DUTY VEHICLES

PERFORMANCE AND EMISSION ANALYSIS OF DIESEL ENGINE BY INJECTING DIETHYL ETHER WITH AND WITHOUT EGR USING DPF

Testing of particulate emissions from positive ignition vehicles with direct fuel injection system. Technical Report

THERMOMANAGEMENT THER by RETROFIT EXHAUST THROTTLING

ETH /19/02. Sampling methodology influences on modern Diesel particle number size distribution measurements

Mammoth Overview A private company established in Mammoth is part of the fast growing MEI Group and is fully Australian owned and operated.

Analytical Tool Development for Aftertreatment Sub-Systems Integration

Light Duty Truck Aftertreatment - Experience and Challenges. Fabien Redon, Houshun Zhang, Charlie Freese and Nabil Hakim. Detroit Diesel Corporation

TRANSIT BUS EMISSION STUDY COMPARISON OF EMISSIONS FROM DIESEL AND NATURAL GAS BUSES

Exhaust After-Treatment System. This information covers design and function of the Exhaust After-Treatment System (EATS) on the Volvo D16F engine.

Diesel Aftertreatment Systems

Environmental Technology Verification Will This Thing Really Work? Douglas VanOsdell RTI Texas Technology Showcase

Diesel Retrofit Programs to Clean-up In-Use Vehicles - U.S. Experience

Providing clean DPF technology for Iran. Soot-free Teheran

Mahdi Doozandegan, Hossein Nemati, Vahid Hosseini*, Mohammadsaid Saidi

PRODUCT INFORMATION SHEET

Diesel Retrofit Technologies Legacy, Current and Upcoming. Charlie Cox Tuesday, June 17, 2008

Dual Exhaust After Treatment System with Electric Heater

Emission Control Technology for Stationary Diesel Engines

Simply intelligent: the new SintDOC diesel particulate filter. Continuous regeneration in top form

1. CAUTIONS (1) Abnormal Soot Accumulation (2) Normal Soot Combustion Standard pattern of soot accumulation

Emissions Control Technologies for Mobile Pollution Sources

Nanoparticle emissions from an off-road Diesel engine equipped with a catalyzed diesel particulate filter

Construction Retrofit in the Context of the LEZ Berlin

California s Program for Controlling Diesel Particulate Matter Emissions

Motor Vehicle Inspection And Maintenance Programs: International Experience And The Lessons Learned. Michael P. Walsh

Verified Retrofit Technologies and Product Offerings. Northeast Diesel Collaborative February 26, 2015

Advanced Catalyzed Gasoline Particulate Filter to Fulfill Future Emission Targets

TNV Series Common Rail. Final Tier 4 19kW to 56kW WATER-COOLED DIESEL ENGINES. EPA Tier 4 (19-56kW) EU Stage IIIB (37-56kW)

Module 6:Emission Control for CI Engines Lecture 31:Diesel Particulate Filters (contd.) The Lecture Contains: Passive/Catalytic Regeneration

Emission reduction using Gecam fuel alone and in combination with different DPF

AECC HEAVY DUTY NRMM TEST PROGRAMME: PARTICLE MEASUREMENT AND CHARACTERISATION

Diesel Exhaust Emission Control Technologies for Asian Market 亚洲市场柴油机废气排放控制技术

Diesel Particulate Filter: Exhaust aftertreatment for the reduction of soot emissions

Future of Trucking Symposium 2010 Engine & Emissions Technology

Quality Control of Emission Control Systems

Investigation of the Feasibility of Achieving Euro VI Heavy-Duty Diesel Emissions Limits by Advanced Emissions Controls

Stratus SMF -AR. Reduces Soot and Fine Particulate by More than 99% stratusdpf.com

Next Generation PN Instruments for Quality Control of DPF Kerbside

Technical feasibility of different regulatory OBD threshold limits (OTL) for Euro 6 (LD) vehicles

Matthew Szuck Technical Project Manager, Customer Management FPT North America, a Brand of CNH Industrial

Exhaust Aftertreatment Technology for Emission Control of Diesel Engines

French - IFSTTAR activities

Over-the-Road Trucks. FuEL FLuIdS SYNTHETIC MOTOR OILS

Cummins/DOE Light Truck Clean Diesel Engine Progress Report

Particulate Emissions from Typical Light-Duty Vehicles taken from the European Fleet, Equipped with a Variety of Emissions Control Technologies

Expected Light Duty Vehicle Emissions from Final Stages of Euro 6

INTERNATIONAL Diesel Engine Emissions Requirements & Technology

NRDC. Diesel Retrofit & Replacement Strategies. Introduction

Highway Engine Regulations in the U.S.

Particle Sensor Performance & Durability for OBD Applications & Beyond

SCAQMD Rule 1470 Impact on Diesel Generator Installations

Transcription:

1 Santiago BUS-DPF-Retrofit Swiss Contributions and Lessons of the Pilot Project 2004 Andreas Mayer / TTM

Emission Reduction Potential of DPF 2 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Russ PAH Asche CO HC NOx krebserzeugende Substanzen

Principles for DPF-Retrofits 3 There must be a Will at involved levels HE-motivated Vehicles must be well maintained Low S-Fuel and LASP-lube oil available Drivers and Mechanics instructed Periodic Controls in place DPF must be VERT-certified and OBC-equipped Only DPF-manufacturer with specific experience Local Partners, well trained and local service support Financial, guarantee, data transfer issues solved at Start

Swiss Contributions 4 Consult and Discuss Overall Concept of the Program Type Approval and Quality Control - Criteria and Methods Selection and Evaluation of DPF-Candidates/Manufacturers Provide Dataloggers: Installation and Data Evaluation Particle Measurement: Instruments and Instruction Selection of Filter Systems for Pilot Test Evaluation of Pilot Test Data General Information on DPF- Experience Worldwide Advice on Methodology for Large Scale Retrofit

5 Concept of the Pilot Program Select 10 representative Vehicles Check on emissions, noise, fuel economy, oil consumption Select DPF-candidates based on Principles Monitor 10 candidate vehicles over 2 month duty cycle Install DPF and run 1. Emission Control on Chassis Dyno Field Test over 2 month / 10 000 km with data acquisition logbook, fuel and lube controls and detailed reporting on any event of malfunctioning 2. Emission Control on Chassis Dyno Based on Data and Information Approval for LS-Retrofit

6 Schedule of the Pilot Program 01.02.04: 1.Meeting Pilot Program Concept (Santiago) 19.03.04: Meeting with AKPF Filter Manufacturers (Zürich) 15.05.04: Datalogger installed 31.06.04: Datalogging w/o DPF complete 01.07.04: low S-Fuel (DIESEL CIUDAD PLUS) available! 05.07.04: DPF-System-Selection (Santiago) 16.08.04: ETH-conference; meetings (Zürich) 17.08.04: Start Retrofit last scheduled retrofit 10.09.04 06.09.04: First emission Test with Nanoparticle analysis (Me&TSI) 30.11.04: Second emission measurements concluded 13.12.04: Pilot Phase concluding meeting (Santiago) Impressive: how perfect this program has been managed by 3CV!

Vehicles and DPF Candidates 7

8 Monitoring - Datalogging Not only during Pilot Program Data Monitor is part of each Filter System

Installation with noise attenuation, heat insulation, vibration decoupling, access for measurements 9

Emission Control 10 Chassis Dynamometer NOx, CO, HC, PM = limited emissions Smoke during free acceleration Ultrafine Particles: SMPS and NanoMet Noise Field (road)- Control Smoke during free acceleration (not sensitive) Engine Dynamometer NOx, CO, HC, PM = limited emissions Smoke during free acceleration Ultrafine Particles: SMPS and NanoMet Size specific metal particle analysis Secondary emissions

11 Some Representative Data without/with Filter Exhaust-Temperatures Filter-Backpressures Exhaust-Emissions

Monitored History with Particle Filter Vehicle: TT 2191 Filter: Engelhard 1 12

Monitored History with Particle Filter Vehicle: NR 4362 Filter: Engelhard 2 13

Monitored History with Particle Filter Vehicle: TE 3776 Filter: HJS-CRT 1 14

Monitored History with Particle Filter Vehicle: SZ 5875 Filter: HUSS 2 15

Monitored History with Particle Filter Vehicle: TF 5204 Filter: ADASTRA 16

Monitored History with Particle Filter Vehicle: RR 1547 Filter: AIRMEEX 17

Monitored History with Particle Filter Vehicle: TZ 7737 Filter: Clean Air 18

Monitored History with Particle Filter Vehicle: UZ 2582 Oxidation Catalyst Südchemie 19

Average Exhaust Temperatures w/wo Filter for the whole Fleet 20 Chile: Transsantiago Pilot Project, Loggerdata Evaluation Status: 03.12.2004 Vehicles: 12 Measurements: 13.04.04 Ð 14.11.04 Average Exhaust Temperature [¼C] Sampling Interval 60 s Sampling Interval 4 s Overall Evaluation Sampling Interval 60 s; T Ð 50 ¼C Sampling Interval 1 s * 400 without / with Trap 350 Average 300 250 200 150 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 100 50 0 LD 8523 NR 4362 RR 1547 SZ 5875 TB 8691 TE 3776 TF 5204 TT 2191 TZ/UK/UY UZ 2582

21 Temperatures and Pressure w/wo Filter Vehicle: TT 2191 Filter: Engelhard 1 Vehicle: TT 2191. Status: 03.12.2004 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Sampling Interval 1 s Sampling Interval 60 s Pressure Max. Sampling Interval 4 s Sampling Interval 60 s; Ð50¼C T Pressure Average without / with Trap Average 600 525 450 375 300 225 150 75 0

22 Temperatures and Pressure w/wo Filter Vehicle: NR 4362 Filter: Engelhard 2 Vehicle: NR 4362. Status: 03.12.2004 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Sampling Interval 1 s Sampling Interval 60 s Pressure Max. Sampling Interval 4 s Sampling Interval 60 s; Ð50¼C T Pressure Average without / with Trap Average 600 525 450 375 300 225 150 75 0

0 0 23 Temperatures and Pressure w/wo Filter Vehicle: TE 3776 Filter: HJS CRT 1 Vehicle: TE 3776. Status: 03.12.2004 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 Sampling Interval 1 s Sampling Interval 60 s Pressure Max. Sampling Interval 4 s Sampling Interval 60 Ð50¼C s; T Pressure Average without / with Trap Average 600 525 450 375 300 225 150 75

0 0 24 Temperatures and Pressure w/wo Filter Vehicle: SZ 5875 Filter: HUSS 2 Vehicle: SZ 5875. Status: 03.12.2004 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 Sampling Interval 1 s Sampling Interval 60 s Pressure Max. Sampling Interval 4 s Sampling Interval 60 Ð50¼C s; T Pressure Average without / with Trap Average 600 525 450 375 300 225 150 75

25 Temperatures and Pressure w/wo Filter Vehicle: RR 1547 Filter: AIRMEEX 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Vehicle: RR 1547. Status: 03.12.2004 Sampling Interval 1 s Sampling Interval 60 s Pressure Max. Sampling Interval 4 s Sampling Interval 60 Ð50¼C s; T Pressure Average without / with Trap Average 600 525 450 375 300 225 150 75 0

0 0 26 Temperatures and Pressure w/wo Filter Vehicle: TF 5204 Filter: ADASTRA Vehicle: TF 5204. Status: 03.12.2004 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 Sampling Interval 1 s Sampling Interval 60 s Pressure Max. Sampling Interval 4 s Sampling Interval 60 Ð50¼C s; T Pressure Average Average without / with Trap 600 525 450 375 300 225 150 75

0 0 27 Temperatures and Pressure w/wo Filter Vehicle: TZ 7737 Filter: Clean Air Vehicles: TZ 7737 / UK 8319 / UY 5202. Status: 03.12.2004 400 350 Sampling Interval 60 s Sampling Interval 60 s; Ð50¼C T with Trap Pressure Max. Pressure Average 600 525 300 450 250 375 200 300 150 225 100 150 50 75

Filtration Efficiency Aftertreatment Licence plate Filtration Adastra DPF VERT TF 52 04 99.909 % Airmeex DPF VERT RR 15 47 99.377% Engelhard DPF VERT NR 43 62 98.249% Engelhard DPF VERT TT 21 91 99.777% HJS DPF VERT TE 37 76 99.954% HJS DPF VERT TJ 92 89 98.588% HJS DPF VERT VF 37 42 99.975% Huss DPF VERT LD 85 23 99.998% Huss DPF VERT SZ 58 75 99.994% DOC DOC ZU 25 82 4.402% Filter X DPF UK 83 19 39.942% Filter Y DPF UY 52 02 34.143%

29 Filter-System Failures 2 Engelhard: no failure or malfunctions 4 HJS: 1 filter plugged/exchanged due to engine TC-failure 2 Huss: 1 filter plugged due to engine TC-failure 1 Airmeex: filter plugged/cleaned/survived during engine failure 1 Adastra filter plugged due to additiv dosing stop /cleaned/survived 1 CleanAir no failure or malfunctions All Filters and System Elements survived although 3 engines had major problems, Filtration after test was as good as before

Engine Failures 30 2 Engine TC-failures: quite unusual high amount of lube oil can plug the CRT-catalyst and when soaked by the filter damages the filter structure due to high regeneration exotherms. 1 Engine Piston-rod-bearing failures: followed by heavy piston seizing massive oil leakage to the exhaust combined with high smoke emission filter plugged DPF can not trigger such failures if backpresssure is under control backpressure monitoring, alarm if backpressure 200 mbar is exceeded.

Conclusions from Pilot Program 31 The Pilot Program has provided all required information: Emission reduction potential proved to be excellent Operating conditions are favorable for regenerations Installations, although tailor-made, survived Local companies can pick-up the retrofit-technology Enough filter systems approved to insure competition However: Engine failures are annoying improve maintenance Reporting on malfunctions must be improved Instruction on filter technology is now urgent First LS-retrofit phase must be very carefully supervised Emission control should be very frequent in first period

Recommendations for Large-Scale Retrofit-Phase 32 All Filters with electronic onboard control OBC with alarms Measurement before/after retrofit in each case by filter manufacturer (local partner) copy of protocol to 3 CV Filter Manufacturer must report every 3 month on number of retrofits, failures, malfunctions, guarantee cases 10 representative vehicles out of each group closely followed ( 1 year) by 3CV with frequent emission checks First 25 retrofits of each manufacturer be checked by 3 CV Introduce: LASP-Oils, Maintenance-Label, Emission-Label 2-year warranty for all filter elements and proper functioning

Truck-Installation in place of Muffler 33

34 Maintenance Label Emission Label

Low-S-Fuel and LASP-Lube Oils) 35

36 Thank You for your kind Attention We are ready for Questions now or later ttm.a.mayer@bluewin.ch