Truck Drayage Metrics

Similar documents
SmartWay DrayFLEET TRUCK DRAYAGE ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY MODEL

Port Disruption Drayage Impacts

2012 Air Emissions Inventory

Current Trends in the Development of Green Ports. APP 102 nd Annual Conference August 16-19, 2015 Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Technical Memorandum Analysis Procedures and Mobility Performance Measures 100 Most Congested Texas Road Sections What s New for 2015

ADVANTAGES OF USING SMARTWAY TECHNOLOGIES

THE PORT OF LOS ANGELES OCCUPIES 4,300 ACRES OF LAND ALONG 43 MILES OF WATERFRONT. THE PORT OF LOS ANGELES IS THE LARGEST PORT IN THE

Yard Hostler Duty Cycle Summary Brad Rutledge Nov. 27, Introduction

Comprehensive Regional Goods Movement Plan and Implementation Strategy Goods Movement in the 2012 RTP/SCS

Item No.: 5B-Supp Date of Meeting: July 17, Briefing on Air Quality Grant Funding

Massport Efforts to Reduce Drayage Truck Emissions. Northeast Drayage Workshop October 13, 2010

Facts and Figures. October 2006 List Release Special Edition BWC National Benefits and Related Facts October, 2006 (Previous Versions Obsolete)

Diesel Rules Compliance Update. Presented by Sean Edgar, Project Manager

NATIONAL CLEAN DIESEL CAMPAIGN & FUNDING DERA, VW, AND SMARTWAY

Call for Projects Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Emissions Formulas Technical Advisory Committee

Middle Harbor Project: Draft EIS/EIR LA Chamber of Commerce June 26, 2008, APM Maersk HQ Pier 400

Appendix SAN San Diego, California 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

Dallas Intermodal Terminal 2006 Baseline and Projected 2009 and 2012 Emissions Inventory DRAFT FINAL REPORT

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Diesel Emission Reduction Program

Federal Funding Opportunities Northeast Drayage Workshop October 13, Reema Loutan Environmental Engineer EPA Region 2

Broward County Intermodal Center And People Mover. AASHTO Value Engineering Conference Presentation. September 1, 2009 San Diego, CA

The USDOT Congestion Pricing Program: A New Era for Congestion Management

San Pedro Bay Ports. Port of Los Angeles 7.9 million TEUs Port of Long Beach 6.0 million TEUs. Total 13.9 million TEUs in 2011

Hunts Point Clean Trucks Program

V I r g I n I A. T h e M A g A z I n e O f T h e P O r T O f V I r g I n I A. November- December 20 09

Jason Hilsenbeck LoadMatch & Drayage.com President Founder

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PORT AUTHORITIES

Texas Transportation Institute

Travel Time Savings Memorandum

What is the VW Fund or the Environmental Mitigation Trust?

Pacific Ports Conference on Clean Air Policies and Strategies

Methods to Find the Cost-Effectiveness of Funding Air Quality Projects

The impact of electric vehicle development on peak demand and the load curve under different scenarios of EV integration and recharging options

Estimated PM2.5 Emissions from Port Operations in Philadelphia

Heavy-Duty Vehicles. Regulatory opportunities, design challenges and policy- relevant research. Fanta Kamakaté. July 30, 2009

Qualifying trucks must be a Class 3 to Class 8 truck with a history of operating in Hunts Point and/or Port Morris.

WIM #39 MN 43, MP 45.2 WINONA, MN APRIL 2010 MONTHLY REPORT

2016 North Trunk Highway 65 Corridor Coalition Manufacturers Survey

Emission Rate Approach for Evaluating the Differences in Emissions Between CNG and Diesel Busses

Overview of FMCSA s Proposed Hours of Service Rules For Truck Drivers. Rob Abbott Vice President of Safety Policy American Trucking Associations

EPA s National Clean Diesel Campaign and the North American ECA

Bella Vista Bypass Benefit Cost Analysis

2012 Air Emissions Inventory

Measures to Reduce Airport-Related Pollution

Methods to Find the Cost-Effectiveness of Funding Air Quality Projects

FE151 Aluminum Association Inc. Impact of Vehicle Weight Reduction on a Class 8 Truck for Fuel Economy Benefits

ON-ROAD HEAVY-DUTY TRUCK APPLICATION

Benefit Cost Analysis

2 VALUE PROPOSITION VALUE PROPOSITION DEVELOPMENT

TRANSPORTATION AIR QUALITY SUBCOMMITTEE. Port of Houston Authority Air Quality and Sustainability Initiatives December 8, 2015

What does Sustainability mean?

Current Status of Alt Truck Technologies

Impact of Transportation Emissions on New Jersey s Air Quality

2012 Air Emissions Inventory

Why is a towboat called a towboat when it pushes the barges?

Green Terminal Operations

Development of a Drayage Truck Chassis Dynamometer Test Cycle. Report FINAL

RAILYARDS SUPPORT A VARIETY OF OPERATIONS INCLUDING: LOCOMOTIVES, ON-ROAD AND OFF-ROAD TRUCKS, CARGO-HANDLING EQUIPMENT, TRANSPORTATION

Areas of the State not meeting Federal Air Quality Standards. Fleet Rule for Transit Agencies

SECTION 6 HEAVY-DUTY VEHICLES

LARGE source of greenhouse gas emissions, and therefore a large

THE NORTHWEST PORTS CLEAN AIR STRATEGY: A COMMON GOAL, THREE COURSES OF ACTIONS

Autonomous taxicabs in Berlin a spatiotemporal analysis of service performance. Joschka Bischoff, M.Sc. Dr.-Ing. Michal Maciejewski

Alternative 3 Air Quality and Climate Change Calculations

City of Seattle CITY OF SEATTLE Biodiesel Implementation FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES FLEET MANAGEMENT DIVISION

Ohio Diesel Fleets: Applying for VW Funds 2018 Application Cycle

WIM #29 was operational for the entire month of October Volume was computed using all monthly data.

National Conference of State Legislators. Ted Scott Director, Special Projects

The Benefits of New Technology Diesel Technology to California

La Canada Flintridge Parents for Healthy Air November 1, 2018 Presented by Elizabeth Krider, Ph.D., Esther Kornfeld and Tamar Tujian

Performance Measure Summary - Seattle WA. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

EPA Heavy Duty Vehicle Emissions Program

Low Emission Vehicle Policy Development in London

WIM #40 US 52, MP S. ST. PAUL, MN APRIL 2010 MONTHLY REPORT

2011 Air Emissions Inventory

Port of South Louisiana. Benefit Cost Analysis. Globalplex Intermodal Efficiency Improvements Project

On-Going Development of Heavy-Duty Vehicle GHG / Fuel Economy Standards

WIM #41 CSAH 14, MP 14.9 CROOKSTON, MINNESOTA MAY 2013 MONTHLY REPORT

Licensed Motor Carriers Clean Trucks Program Workshop. Beneficial Cargo Owner Workshop September 11, 2008

Philip Schaffner & Jason Junge Minnesota Department of Transportation

Ports of Delaware and Virginia (DE-VA)* Dray Truck Replacement Program Application

2008 Air Emissions Inventory SECTION 6 HEAVY-DUTY VEHICLES

TerraCair Diesel Exhaust Fluid Sales Presentation

2013 Air Emissions Inventory

WIM #41 CSAH 14, MP 14.9 CROOKSTON, MINNESOTA APRIL 2014 MONTHLY REPORT

Measurement and Modeling of Fuel Use and Exhaust Emissions from Idling Long-Haul Freight Truck and Auxiliary Power Unit Engines

DIESEL PARTICULATE MATTER MITIGATION PLAN FOR THE BNSF RAILROAD SAN DIEGO RAIL YARD

August 11, Bob Costello Senior Vice President & Chief Economist American Trucking Associations

Fundamental Nature of Global Commerce Changing

March 5, Information for Decision Making

NYCBS June 2013 Monthly Report

FINAL REPORT AP STATISTICS CLASS DIESEL TRUCK COUNT PROJECT

The Evans Network of Companies. Northeast Drayage Workshop Boston, MA October 13, 2010

Wisconsin Clean Cities Driving Wisconsin Forward. Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Eco-Driving Program

Valet Parking Management Plan

OVERVIEW OF STATE FERRY SYSTEM OPERATIONS

Project 2: Traffic and Queuing (updated 28 Feb 2006)

On-Road Emissions Reductions and the Regional Comprehensive Goods Movement Plan Background and Policy Questions

Clean Diesel Funding. Clean Airport Fleets Workshop June 14, 2011

South Coast AQMD Grant/Incentive Programs. Brian Choe Air Quality Specialist Technology Advancement Office

Transcription:

Truck Drayage Metrics Frank Harder The Group, Inc. AAPA/EDF Environmental Performance Metrics Workshop October 10, 2012 www.tiogagroup.com/215-557-2142

Key Questions and Answers Key questions Where are the drayage bottlenecks and delays? How do we measure them? How do we evaluate solutions? Answers Congestion and exceptions cause most delays The bottlenecks are in the terminal gate, container yard, and chassis pool Terminal, trucker, and wencam data provide metrics EPA s SmartWay DrayFLEET model is the key evaluation tool 2

Example Hooking Up a Chassis Can we save an average of 2.4 minutes? For 6 million annual chassis hook-ups at LALB marine terminals, that s $4.6 million, 100 CY parking slots, 12 tons of NOx, and 1053 tons of CO 2 Hooking Up Chassis - Current Minutes Frequency Minimal time 7 10% Planned Time 10 45% Congested Time 30 40% Exception Time 90 5% Weighted Average 21.7 100% Hooking Up Chassis - Improved Minutes Frequency Minimal time 7 10% Planned Time 10 48% Congested Time 30 40% Exception Time 90 2% Weighted Average 19.3 100% NOTE - TIMES STRICTLY FOR ILLUSTRATION 3

Marine Terminal Data Available marine terminal data Volume Transaction characteristics Gate times Trouble tickets Metrics from available data Turn times and distribution - by terminal condition, time, or transaction characteristic Peaking daily, weekly, seasonally Trouble ticket rates by driver, ocean carrier, or marine carrier Chassis selection time 4

Turn Time Minutes Terminal Congestion Terminal data (which exclude ingate queues) show a strong increase in turn times above 1100 daily trips 100.0 90.0 Import Deliveries vs. Non-Trouble Turn Time - 2008 80.0 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 500 700 900 1100 1300 1500 1700 1900 2100 Daily Import Volume 5

Data on Exceptions Exceptions trouble tickets appear to be chiefly process and information issues TROUBLE TICKETS Booking size/type required Container number unknown Booking not on File Booking tally reached Bill of Lading held by line operator: Empty to yard position EMPTY Container Not Allowed 2008 2007 New empty to be ON-HIRED New FULL Container not allowed Must Be on Hired No load receipt for containers until %S. Trucker Contract with line Expired New BARE CHASSIS not allowed 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 6

Motor Carrier Data Available motor carrier data GPS/AVL Data Dispatch practices Survey results Metrics from available data Turn times and distribution including queue time outside gate Understanding of dispatch patterns Corroboration of findings from other data 7

Percent of Trips Total Turn Times GPS Data 30-90 minute norm with a 5% tail of exceptions 20% 18% 16% 14% Example Terminal Turn Time Port-wide Trucker Turn Time 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% GPS data show added queue time avg. around 20 min. 5% of the moves use 14% of the total time and back up the queue 0% 0-15 15-30 30-45 45-60 60-75 75-90 90-105 105-120 120-135 135-150 150-165 165-180 180-195 195-210 210-225 225-240 240-255 255-270 270-285 285-300 Time Interval - Minutes 8

Total Turn Times GPS Data 9

Webcam Data Available webcam data Length of queues outside the gates Time at gates Metrics from available data Queuing times queue time outside gate Gate processing times Impact of gate closures Corroboration of findings from other data 10

Vancouver Webcam Example 11

16:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 Average Congestion Level For Each Time Slot (Sorted by Day) CONGESTION LEVEL 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 Gate Queues Webcam Data Long queues in the mornings and for export cut-offs late in the week Not Vancouver Data 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Level 0 - an open lane exists, no wait Level 1-1 to 3 trucks in line, 0-15 min. wait Level 2-4 to 6 trucks in line, 15-30 min. wait Level 3 - end of line not visible, 30+ min. wait MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY Time Slot (Monday to Friday) 12

What does it cost? Drayage delays are costing $200 million, 14.5 million hours, and 10 million gallons of fuel annually, and emitting 111,000 tons of CO 2, 979 tons of NOx, and 18 tons of PM2.5. Scenario Hours Fuel C02 NOx PM 2.5 Cost (million) (million gal.) (tons) (tons) (tons) (million) 2008 National Default 39.10 69.90 782,613 7,678 149 $ 1,440.00 30 vs. 40 Minute Terminal Time (3.17) (1.40) (15,652) (160) (3) $ (79) Change -8.10% -2.00% -2.00% -2.09% -1.93% -5.50% 10 vs. 20 Minute Queue Time (2.66) (1.96) (21,913) (225) (4) $ (69) Change -6.80% -2.80% -2.80% -2.93% -2.71% -4.80% 3% vs. 5% Trouble Tickets (0.31) (0.15) (1,632) (17) (0) $ (8) Change -0.80% -0.20% -0.20% -0.22% -0.20% -0.50% 0% vs. 5% Trouble Tickets (0.78) (0.35) (3,913) (42) (1) $ (20) Change -2.00% -0.50% -0.50% -0.55% -0.51% -1.40% Idling Control - 50% - (5.87) (65,739) (450) (8) $ (17) Change 0.00% -8.40% -8.40% -5.87% -5.44% -1.20% 100% vs. 20% Neutral Pools (0.78) (0.35) (3,913) (42) (1) $ (20) Change -2.00% -0.50% -0.50% -0.55% -0.51% -1.40% Trucker-Supplied Chassis (6.10) (4.40) (49,305) (503) (9) $ (137) Change -15.60% -6.30% -6.30% -6.56% -6.07% -9.50% Combined Strategies (14.50) (9.93) (111,050) (979) (18) $ (202) Change -37.08% -14.21% -14.19% -12.75% -11.82% -14.01% 13

EPA DrayFLEET Modeling Develop a planning-level emissions and drayage activity model that depicts drayage activity in terms of VMT Emissions Cost Throughput COMPATIBILITY WITH FLEET MODEL, REALISM FOR INDUSTRY CONFIDENCE Reflect the impact of changing management practices, terminal operations, and cargo volume, including Extended gate hours DETAILED, Appointment systems ACTIVITY-BASED Chassis pools MODEL WITH FLEXIBLE INPUTS Virtual container yards Near-dock or on-dock rail terminals Truck retirement/rebuild/replacement programs 14

DrayFLEET Inputs & Outputs SmartWay DrayFLEET Version 2.0 Primary Inputs & Outputs DrayFLEET Version 2.0 Beta of 01/18/12 Primary Inputs Default Scenario Port Generic Port Terminal(s) Non-specific Calendar Year (Change manually) 2010 2010 Scenario Annual TEU 2,000,000 2,000,000 BETA Version for evaluation Only Average TEU per Container KEY 1.75 PORT AND 1.75 This version has internal calculations unhidden and unprote Inbound Share TERMINAL 50% 50% Inbound Empty Share 5% 5% INPUTS Outbound Empty Share 25% 25% Rail Intermodal Share 25% 25% Marine Terminals Date 1/18/2012 Average Inbound Gate Queue Minutes 15 15 Average Marine Terminal Min. per Transaction 30 30 Activity Outputs Default Scenario Change % Change Rail Terminals Annual Activity Weighted Average Miles from Port 5 5 Number of Drayage Trip Legs 2,436,570 2,436,570 0 0.0% Average Inbound Gate Queue Minutes 5 5 Drayage Trip Legs per Container 2.1 2.1 0.0 0.0% Average Rail Yard Min. per Transaction 15 15 Total Drayage VMT 54,510,587 54,510,587 0 0.0% Container/Chassis Depots CUSTOMER & Drayage VMT per Container 47.7 47.7 0.0 0.0% Weighted Average Miles from Port COST 2DATA 2 Fleet Required (FTE Tractors) 1,444 1,444 0 0.0% Share of Empties Stored at Depots 10% 10% Annual Duty Cycle Totals ACTIVITY Container Shippers/Receivers Idle/Stopped Hours 1,865,911 1,865,911 0 0.0% Weighted Average Miles from Port 25 25 Creep Hours 736,931 736,931 0 0.0% Weighted Average Crosstown Trip Miles 10 10 Transient Hours 478,276 478,276 0 0.0% Trucker Yard Operations Cruise Hours 1,199,466 1,199,466 0 0.0% Weighted Average Miles from Port 10 10 Total Drayage Hours 4,280,584 4,280,584 0 0.0% Truck Yard share of Port bobtail moves 50% 50% Drayage Hours per Container 3.7 3.7 0.0 0.0% Cost Factors Average Drayage Labor Cost per Hour $ 15.00 $ 15.00 Outputs Default Scenario Change % Change Average Diesel Fuel Price per Gallon $ 3.25 $ 3.25 Pollutant (annual tons) Initiative Inputs Default HC 93.7 93.7-0.0% Port/Terminal Initiatives CO 448.1 448.1-0.0% Stacked Terminal (% stacked) 50% 50% NOx 1,483.6 1,483.6 EMISSIONS - 0.0% On-Dock Rail (% of rail on-dock) 0% 0% PM 2.5 101.9 101.9-0.0% Automated Gates (% of gate transactions) MANAGEMENT 0% 0% CO 2 184,986.8 184,986.8-0.0% Extended Gate Hours (% off-peak, 50% max) 0% 0% Fuel Use and Total Cost STRATEGIES Container Info System (% used) 0% 0% Fuel - Gallons 17,932,147 17,932,147-0.0% Virtual Container Yard (% available) 0% 0% Total Drayage Cost $ 187,470,331 $ 187,470,331 COST $ & FUEL - 0.0% Neutral Chassis Pool (% used) 0% 0% Drayage Cost per Container $ 164 $ 164 $ - 0.0% 15

Example: Terminal Gate Initiatives 1.0 to 3.7% hypothetical 2010 emissions savings SmartWay DrayFLEET Version 2.0 Primary Inputs & Outputs DrayFLEET Version 2.0 Beta of 01/18/12 Primary Inputs Default Scenario Port Seattle 2010 "Rough Guess" Port Terminal(s) All Calendar Year (Change manually) 2010 2010 Scenario No pre-2004 Trucks Annual TEU 1,835,575 1,835,575 80% Automated Gates CREATE 2010 Average TEU per Container 1.75 1.75 80% IT Inbound Share 50% 50% PORT DEFAULT 50% Neutral Pool Inbound Empty Share 2% 2.2% Outbound Empty Share 39% 39% BETA Version for evaluation Only Rail Intermodal Share 50% 50% This version has internal calculations unhidden and unprote Marine Terminals Date 1/18/2012 Average Inbound Gate Queue Minutes 15 15 Average Marine Terminal Min. per Transaction 30 30 Activity Outputs Default Scenario Change % Change Rail Terminals Annual Activity Weighted Average Miles from Port 5 5 Number of Drayage Trip Legs 1,945,060 1,945,060 0 0.0% Average Inbound Gate Queue Minutes 5 5 Drayage Trip Legs per Container 1.9 1.9 0.0 0.0% Average Rail Yard Min. per Transaction 15 15 Total Drayage VMT 35,676,217 35,950,006 273,788 0.8% Container/Chassis Depots Drayage VMT per Container 34.0 34.3 0.3 0.8% Weighted Average Miles from Port 2 2 Fleet Required (FTE Tractors) 1,038 1,111 73 7.0% Share of Empties Stored at Depots 10% 10% Annual Duty Cycle Totals SEE THE Container Shippers/Receivers Idle/Stopped Hours 1,367,557 1,429,163 61,606 4.5% Weighted Average Miles from Port 25 25 Creep Hours 567,155DIFFERENCE 720,703 153,548 27.1% ZERO Weighted Average OUT Crosstown Trip Miles 10 10 Transient Hours 352,365 353,201 836 0.2% Trucker Yard Operations Cruise Hours 790,245 790,245 0 0.0% Weighted GATE Average Miles from Port 10 10 Total Drayage Hours 3,077,323 3,293,312 215,990 7.0% Truck Yard share of Port bobtail moves 50% 50% Drayage Hours per Container 2.9 3.1 0.2 7.0% Cost Factors TECHNOLOGY Average Drayage Labor Cost per Hour $ 15.00 $ 15.00 Outputs Default Scenario Change % Change Average Diesel Fuel Price per Gallon $ 3.25 $ 3.25 Pollutant (annual tons) Initiative Inputs Default HC 65.3 66.6 1.4 2.1% Port/Terminal Initiatives CO 306.8 310.1 3.3 1.1% Stacked Terminal (% stacked) 50% 50% NOx 1,010.2 1,020.2 10.0 1.0% On-Dock Rail (% of rail on-dock) 0% 0% PM 2.5 70.3 73.0 2.6 3.7% Automated Gates (% of gate transactions) 80% 0% CO 2 127,277.1 131,990.7 4,713.5 3.7% Extended Gate Hours (% off-peak, 50% max) 0% 0% Fuel Use and Total Cost Container Info System (% used) 80% 0% Fuel - Gallons 12,337,920 12,794,838 456,918 3.7% Virtual Container Yard (% available) 0% 0% Total Drayage Cost $ 135,983,468 $ 142,507,237 $ 6,523,768 4.8% Neutral Chassis Pool (% used) 50% 0% Drayage Cost per Container $ 130 $ 136 $ 6 4.8% 16

Example: Eliminate Pre-2003 Trucks Values on this worksheet are not affected by reset macros 22-53% hypothetical 2010 emissions savings Fleet Age Distribution SmartWay DrayFLEET Version 2.0 - Drayage Fleet Inputs Age Distribution Curves Scenario Same as Default 1 Default LALB Default 1 1 45.0% 40.0% Scenario Model Year Age # % Age # % 35.0% 2010 0 19 1.4% 0 19 0% 30.0% Default 25.0% 2009 1 26 2.0% 1 26 0% 20.0% 2008 2 52 3.9% 2 52 1% 15.0% 2007 3 67 5.1% 3 67 1% 10.0% 2006 4 76 5.7% 4 76 1% 5.0% 0.0% 2005 5 188 14.2% 5 188 3% -5.0% 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2004 6 382 28.9% 6 382 5% Activity Outputs Age Default Scenario Change % Change 2003 7 514 38.8% 7 514 7% Annual Activity 2002 8 0.0% 8 677 9% Drayage Number Fleet of Technology Drayage Trip and Legs Strategy Inputs 1,945,060 1,945,060 0 0.0% 2001 9 0.0% 9 664 9% Drayage Trip Legs per Container 1.9 1.9 0.0 0.0% 2000 10 0.0% 10 465 6% Technology Retrofits Total Drayage VMT 35,676,217 35,676,217 0 0.0% 1999 11 0.0% 11 495 7% Particulate Filter/Trap % of eligible fleet retrofit 50% Drayage VMT per Container 34.0 34.0 0.0 0.0% 1998 12 0.0% 12 518 7% Oxidation Catalyst % of eligible fleet retrofit 50% 1997 13 0.0% 13 610 9% Flow-Through Fleet Filter Required (FTE Tractors) 1,038 1,038 0 0.0% % of eligible fleet retrofit 50% 1996 14 0.0% 14 423 6% Idle Annual ReductionDuty Cycle Totals 1995 15 0.0% 15 313 4% Idling Control Strategies Idle/Stopped % Hours reduction in idle 1,367,557 50% 1,367,557 0 0.0% 1994 16 0.0% 16 257 4% Fuel Conservation Creep Hours 567,155 567,155 SEE THE 0 0.0% 1993 17 0.0% 17 443 6% Single-Wide Tires Transient Hours% of fleet 352,365 50% 352,365 0 0.0% 1992 18 0.0% 18 392 5% Automatic Tire Inflation Cruise Hours% of fleet 790,245 50% DIFFERENCE 790,245 0 0.0% 1991 19 0.0% 19 132 2% Tare Weight Reduction Total Drayage Hours% of fleet 3,077,323 50% 3,077,323 0 0.0% 1990 20 0.0% 20 90 1% Drayage Hours per Container lbs of weight saved 2,000 2.9 2.9 0.0 0.0% 1989 21 0.0% 21 73 1% Low Friction Engine Lubricant % of fleet 50% 1988 22 0.0% 22 73 1% Low Friction Drive Train Lubricant % of fleet 50% % Outputs Default Scenario Change % Change 1987 23 0.0% 23 60 1% Direct Drivetrain % of fleet 50% 1986 24 0.0% 24 153 2% Single Pollutant Axle Drive (annual (vs. Dual Axle) tons) % of fleet 50% Total 1,324 100% Total 7,162 100% Speed Management Policy (55 mph) HC% of fleet 50% 65.3 50.6 (14.6) -22.4% CHANGE THE FLEET CO 306.8 183.3 (123.5) -40.2% NOx 1,010.2 469.3 (540.9) -53.5% DISTRIBUTION PM 2.5 70.3 47.6 (22.8) -32.4% CO 2 127,277.1 127,675.9 398.8 0.3% Fuel Use and Total Cost Fuel - Gallons 12,337,920 12,376,575 38,655 0.3% Total Drayage Cost $ 135,983,468 $ 136,109,098 $ 125,629 0.1% Drayage Cost per Container $ 130 $ 130 $ 0 0.1% 17

Thank you! Questions? Contacts and Follow-ups National Cooperative Freight Research Program Report 11: http://www.trb.org/main/blurbs/165528.aspx EPA SmartWay DrayFLEET: http://www.epa.gov/smartway/partnership/drayage.htm website: www.tiogagroup.com Frank Harder: fharder@tiogagroup.com, 215-557-2140 18