Aircraft Design in a Nutshell

Similar documents
Flugzeugentwurf / Aircraft Design SS Part 35 points, 70 minutes, closed books. Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dieter Scholz, MSME. Date:

Flugzeugentwurf / Aircraft Design WS 10/ Klausurteil 30 Punkte, 60 Minuten, ohne Unterlagen. Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dieter Scholz, MSME

Systems Group (Summer 2012) 4 th Year (B.Eng) Aerospace Engineering Candidate Carleton University, Ottawa,Canada Mail:

Aircraft Design Conceptual Design

AIRCRAFT DESIGN SUBSONIC JET TRANSPORT

The Airplane That Could!

SD3-60 AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE MANUAL. This chapter includes information on dimensions, areas, zoning, etc. and is presented as follows:

Typical Reserve Policy

EAS 4700 Aerospace Design 1

Chapter 2 Lecture 5 Data collection and preliminary three-view drawing - 2 Topic

Design Considerations for Stability: Civil Aircraft

Flying Low and Slow. (and the Tools for its Calculation) Dieter Scholz. Hamburg University of Applied Sciences

European Aviation Safety Agency

AE 451 Aeronautical Engineering Design I Estimation of Critical Performance Parameters. Prof. Dr. Serkan Özgen Dept. Aerospace Engineering Fall 2015

Chapter 10 Miscellaneous topics - 2 Lecture 39 Topics

Investigation of a Novel Turboprop-Driven Aircraft Concept Including Future Technologies

AE 451 Aeronautical Engineering Design Final Examination. Instructor: Prof. Dr. Serkan ÖZGEN Date:

AVIATION OPERATIONAL MEASURES FOR FUEL AND EMISSIONS REDUCTION WORKSHOP Weight Management

The Sonic Cruiser A Concept Analysis

Optimum Seat Abreast Configuration for an Regional Jet

Aircraft Design: A Systems Engineering Approach, M. Sadraey, Wiley, 2012 Chapter 11 Aircraft Weight Distribution Tables

Aircraft Design: A Systems Engineering Approach, M. Sadraey, Wiley, 2012 Chapter 3 Aircraft Conceptual Design. Tables

An Integrated Approach to the Design-Optimization of an N+3 Subsonic Transport

Environmentally Focused Aircraft: Regional Aircraft Study

ECO-CARGO AIRCRAFT. ISSN: International Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology Research (IJSETR) Volume 1, Issue 2, August 2012

AIRPORT PLANNING MANUAL

THE ANALYSIS OF WING PERFORMANCE FOR RECONNAISSANCE UAV ZULKIFLI BIN YUSOF UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA PAHANG

A Game of Two: Airbus vs Boeing. The Big Guys. by Valerio Viti. Valerio Viti, AOE4984, Project #1, March 22nd, 2001

Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of a Strut-Braced Wing Transonic Transport

blended wing body aircraft for the

INVESTIGATION OF ICING EFFECTS ON AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF AIRCRAFT AT TSAGI

Chapter 3: Aircraft Construction

Classical Aircraft Sizing II

JetBiz. Six and Eight Passenger Business Jets

Preliminary Detailed Design Review

A-VIATOR (AP68TP 600) Presentation

TYPE-CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET

AIAA UNDERGRADUATE TEAM DESIGN COMPETITION PROPOSAL 2017

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF UTM 4-SEATER HELICOPTER. Mohd Shariff Ammoo 1 Mohd Idham Mohd Nayan 1 Mohd Nasir Hussain 2

Humming Aerospace Version 9 Blade ti

JODEL D.112 INFORMATION MANUAL C-FVOF

Chapter 10 Parametric Studies

AIRLINE TRANSPORT PILOTS LICENSE ( FLIGHT PERFORMANCE AND PLANNING)

Preliminary design of Aircraft Landing Gear Strut

Team 2. AAE451 System Requirements Review. Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney

A-VIATOR (AP68TP 600)

DESIGN OF A FIFTH GENERATION AIR SUPERIORITY FIGHTER AIRCRAFT

Figure 3.1. Aircraft conceptual design

Classical Aircraft Sizing I

A STUDY OF STRUCTURE WEIGHT ESTIMATING FOR HIGH ALTITUDE LONG ENDURENCE (HALE) UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE (UAV)

7. PRELIMINARY DESIGN OF A SINGLE AISLE MEDIUM RANGE AIRCRAFT

New Design Concept of Compound Helicopter

TEAM Four Critical Design Review. Kai Jian Cheong Richard B. Choroszucha* Lynn Lau Mathew Marcucci Jasmine Sadler Sapan Shah Chongyu Brian Wang

This Flight Planning Guide is published for the purpose of providing specific information for evaluating the performance of the Cessna Corvalis TT.

PIPER CUB J3-65 N68952 PRE-FLIGHT CHECKLIST

Small Fixed Wing Aircraft Operational Weight and Balance Computations

Sierra. R/STOL High Lift Systems. Toll Free LANCAIR. Sierra R/STOL High Lift System Benefits DURING APPROACH AND LANDING DURING TAKEOFF

DESIGN THE VTOL AIRCRAFT FOR LAND SURVEYING PURPOSES SHAHDAN BIN AZMAN

AE 451 Aeronautical Engineering Design I Propulsion and Fuel System Integration. Prof. Dr. Serkan Özgen Dept. Aerospace Engineering December 2017

AE 452 Aeronautical Engineering Design II Installed Engine Performance. Prof. Dr. Serkan Özgen Dept. Aerospace Engineering March 2016

ROYAL CANADIAN AIR CADETS PROFICIENCY LEVEL FOUR INSTRUCTIONAL GUIDE SECTION 2 EO M DESCRIBE PROPELLER SYSTEMS PREPARATION

AN ADVANCED COUNTER-ROTATING DISK WING AIRCRAFT CONCEPT Program Update. Presented to NIAC By Carl Grant November 9th, 1999

TYPE-CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET

CHAPTER 10. WEIGHT AND BALANCE

10th Australian International Aerospace Congress

TYPE-CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET

@AIRBUS A318 AIRCRAFT CHARACTERISTICS AIRPORT AND MAINTENANCE PLANNING

TYPE-CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET

@AIRBUS A319 AIRCRAFT CHARACTERISTICS AIRPORT AND MAINTENANCE PLANNING

DUCHESS BE-76 AND COMMERCIAL MULTI ADD-ON ORAL REVIEW FOR CHECKRIDE

@AIRBUS A320 AIRCRAFT CHARACTERISTICS AIRPORT AND MAINTENANCE PLANNING

@AIRBUS A321 AIRCRAFT CHARACTERISTICS AIRPORT AND MAINTENANCE PLANNING

A PARAMETRIC STUDY OF THE DEPLOYABLE WING AIRPLANE FOR MARS EXPLORATION

@AIRBUS A319 AIRCRAFT CHARACTERISTICS AIRPORT AND MAINTENANCE PLANNING

FLIGHT PERFORMANCE AND PLANNING (1) MASS AND BALANCE

Conceptual Design Review

European Aviation Safety Agency

PAC 750XL PAC 750XL PAC-750XL

European Aviation Safety Agency

Development of a Subscale Flight Testing Platform for a Generic Future Fighter

Preface. Acknowledgments. List of Tables. Nomenclature: organizations. Nomenclature: acronyms. Nomenclature: main symbols. Nomenclature: Greek symbols

Three major types of airplane designs are 1. Conceptual design 2. Preliminary design 3. Detailed design

European Aviation Safety Agency

EASA TYPE-CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET EASA.A.038 SWIFT S-1

PIPER CUB J3-65 N68952 PRE-FLIGHT CHECKLIST COCKPIT

Technical report A-054/1999 APPENDICES

Automatic Aircraft Configuration Redesign The Application of MDO Results to a CAD File

SECTION 6 WEIGHT & BALANCE/EQUIPMENT LIST

Appenidix E: Freewing MAE UAV analysis

The AGUSTA 109 is a high speed, high performance twin engine helicopter, with a single main rotor system and anti-torque tail rotor system.

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT

Model builder s Eye Boeing 787

ESCAPE Economic SCreening of Aircraft Preventing Emissions. Annex I: Designing aircraft for low emissions; technical basis for the ESCAPE project

Systems Definition Review

TYPE-CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET

DEVELOPMENT OF A MORPHING FLYING PLATFORM FOR ADAPTIVE CONTROL SYSTEM STUDY

Design of a High Altitude Fixed Wing Mini UAV Aerodynamic Challenges

DO NOT WRITE ON THIS TEST FEB 2013 Elmendorf Aero Club Aircraft Test. Cessna - 182

AIRPORT PLANNING MANUAL

Design of a New Stratotanker. A Project. Presented to the Aerospace Engineering Faculty. San Jose State University

Transcription:

Dieter Scholz Aircraft Design in a Nutshell Based on the Aircraft Design Lecture Notes 1 Introduction The task of aircraft design in the practical sense is to supply the "geometrical description of a new flight vehicle". To do this, the new aircraft is described by a three-view drawing, a fuselage cross-section, a cabin layout and a list of aircraft parameters. The following requirements should be known when aircraft design begins: Cruise performance: Payload m PL Range R Mach number M CR Airport performance: Take-off field length s TO Landing field length s L Climb gradient γ CLB (2nd segment) Missed approach climb gradient γ MA. The key design parameters are: Take-off mass m TO Fuel mass m F Operating empty mass m OE Wing area S W Take-off thrust T TO. The task of aircraft design in an abstract sense is to determine the design parameters so as to ensure that 1. the requirements and constraints are met (then we have a permissible design including certification) and, furthermore, 2. the design objectives are optimally met (then we have an optimum design). 1

2 Aircraft Design Sequence The sequence of activities during the project phase can be divided into: 1. preliminary sizing (step 1 to 5) 2. conceptual design (step 6 to 16) 2

3 Requirements and Certification The seat-range diagram shows the aircraft of one manufacturer based on their number of seats versus their range. A big aircraft manufacturer should fill all viable areas of the diagram with aircraft on offer. Filling a seat-range diagram is possible with a limited number of aircraft families. Aircraft should always be designed as an aircraft family. An aircraft family consists of several aircraft based on a standard model and additional aircraft with shortened fuselage (shrink) and aircraft with lengthend fuselage (stretch). A typical average load factor is 80 %. A typical average range flexibility is: 4 for short medium range aircraft, 2 for long range aircraft. The dependencies of payload and range for one aircraft are depicted in the payload-rangediagram. It is based on m TO = m OE + m F + m PL m TO m OE m F m PL take-off mass operating empty mass fuel mass payload. 3

The payload-range-diagram: Certification requirements are important for aircraft design because an aircraft may only be operated if it is certified (i.e. has a type certificate). 4

4 Aircraft Configurations A three-view-drawing is used to communicate the ideas about an aircraft configuration. Boeing B737-300 Conventional aircraft configurations all have one fuselage, one wing, and an empennage at their rear end. This configuration is also called tail aft aircraft. Unconventional aircraft configurations differ in at least one attribute from the definition of a conventional configuration. 5

5 Preliminary Sizing The aim of optimization is to achieve the following: Priority 1: to achieve the smallest possible thrust-to-weight ratio; Priority 2: to achieve the highest possible wing loading. First law of aircraft design : Estimation of maximum take-off mass, MTOW 6

Estimation of operating empty mass, OEW Estimation of fuel mass, m F Mission fuel fraction: SFC T = 16 mg/(ns) For the full set of calculations for preliminary sizing an Excel table is provided! 7

6 Fuselage Design Number of seats in one row (number of seats abreast) in economy class: Cabin cross section: Internal fuselage diameter (internal cabin width), d F,I : d F,I = width of all seats + width of all aisles + 2. (gap between seat and side wall) Width of seats (economy class): Single seat 21 in Bench with 2 seats 40 in Bench with 3 seats 60 in Width of aisles: Minimum according to certification rules Typical short medium range 15 in 19 in Number of aisles, CS-25.817 requires: n SA 6 : one aisle 6 < n SA 12 : two aisles Gap between seat and side wall: Conversion to SI units: 1 in 1 in = 0,0254 m 8

Fuselage wall thickness (left and right), d: Outer fuselage diameter (internal cabin width), d F = d F,O : d F = d F,I + d Number of rows: n R = n PAX / n SA Cabin length: l cabin = n R. 1 m Fuselage shape of a passenger aircraft: Bug (German) = bow Heck (German) = stern Tail angle and length of stern are related: ϕ tail = arctan (d F / l stern ) ϕ tail = arctan (1/ 3.5) = 15.9 l stern = d F / tan ϕ tail ϕ tail is also the maximum angle for rotation at take-off. ϕ tail is also the aircraft s angle of attack, α at take-off. 9

Fuselage length: Checking for sufficient size of cargo compartment: Density of baggage, ρ B and cargo, ρ C : 10

Single aisle: Twin aisle: S OS given in m². ρ B is the maximum allowed baggage density in the bin. Table 3.3 from: NIŢĂ, Mihaela Florentina: Contributions to Aircraft Preliminary Design and Optimization. München : Verlag Dr. Hut, 2013. - ISBN 978-3-8439-1163-4, Dissertation, Download: http://opera.profscholz.de Cabin layout: Cabin layout of the Fokker 50: Baggage and cargo are also accommodated in the cabin of this aircraft. A: attendant seat B: baggage, C: cargo G: galley S: stowage, wardrobe T: toilet. 11

7 Wing Design Sweep angle of the wing: ϕ 25 = 39,3 (M CR ) 2 Relative thickness of the wing, t/c from cruise Mach number only: Relative thickness of the wing, t/c from cruise Mach and wing sweep: 12

(t/c) r / (t/c) t = r 1.3 (t/c) t = 4/(3+r) t/c (t/c) r = r (t/c) t Optimum taper ratio, λ opt : ϕ 25 in degree λ should not be smaller than 0.2 otherwise aileron integration will be too difficult and the wing tips will have a tendency to stall. Wing twist: 13

Incident angle of the wing (at the wing root): Dihedral angle of the wing: NIŢĂ, Mihaela Florentina: Contributions to Aircraft Preliminary Design and Optimization. München : Verlag Dr. Hut, 2013. - ISBN 978-3- 8439-1163-4, Dissertation, Download: http://opera.profscholz.de Tank volume within the wing (without center tank): 14

8 Design of Highlift Systems 15

9 Tail Sizing S = H C H S l W H c MAC C S = V V S l V W b 16

10 Mass and Center of Gravity 17

18

12 Landing Gear Integration Nose gear loads need to be sufficiently high (5% to 10 % of total aircraft weight) and determine the position of the main landing gear: These clearance angles determine the length of the landing gear: A kinked wing trailing edge provides space for the integration of a wing mounted landing gear in case of an aft swept wing. The main landing gear is positioned aft of the center of gravity. Also the wing is positioned with respect of the center of gravity. 19

Number of main landing gear wheels: n MLG = m MTO / 30 t n MLG = m MTO / 20 t for large long range aircraft for smaller aircraft operating from smaller airports Tire pressure: Aircraft tires are filled with nitrogen gas at pressure up to 15bar. Tire sizing for width and diameter: Aircraft tires have a ratio between width, w and diameter, d of about w/d = 0.35 0.40. The equivalent ground pressure P* a tire can carry depends on it s with and diameter and is between 32 t/m² and 42 t/m2 p* = m MTO / (n W d w) d. w = m MTO / (n W p*) d n W mmto p * w/ d = w = w/d. d 20

13 Drag Prediction e e 0.85 or more precisely calculated from Appendix A of Aircraft Design Lecture Notes V / Vs = 1.2 for take-off and initial climb V / Vs = 1.3 for approach and landing Estimating C D0 from E max C D,0 A e = π 4 E 2 max 21

k E calculated: k E given: k E 14.9 when calculated for standard parameters (e = 0.85, C f = 0.003) k E 15.8 according to data in Raymer s book k E 15.15 short range aircraft k E 16.19 medium range aircraft 17.25 long range aircraft k E Estimating C D0 from wetted area Estimating C D0 from drag built up => see: Aircraft Design Lecture Notes, Section 13 22

Calculating the glide ratio, E 23

14 Design Evaluation / DOC For details see Aircraft Design Lecture Notes, Section 14. 24

25