Presentation To HRTPO Passenger Rail Task Force. HRTPO Norfolk-Richmond Passenger Rail Operations Plan and Costs.

Similar documents
Presentation To: HRTPO Passenger Rail Task Force

HRTPO Strategic Campaign. Passenger Rail. Agenda Item #11. Presentation To. May 19, Presentation By

Development of the Preferred Option and Implementation Plan

Development of 220 mph High Speed Rail Service for Illinois. Mark C. Walbrun, PE TranSystems Corporation

Proposal for September 2006 Start of Commuter Rail from Lovejoy on the Macon Line to Atlanta

The Northeast Corridor Master Plan Amtrak s Next Generation High-Speed Rail and Northeastern Maryland

Georgia Department of Transportation 2006 Fact Sheet Lovejoy to Atlanta Rail Line visit the website at

4 COSTS AND OPERATIONS

Rocky Mountain. Corridor Input Team. Alternatives Overview. TEMS, Inc. / Quandel Consultants, LLC TEMS, Inc. / Quandel Consultants, LLC

DRAFT Subject to modifications

Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

An Overview of High Speed Rail. David Randall Peterman Congressional Research Service

U.S. System Summary: ARIZONA/SOUTHWEST

AMTRAK ENVISIONS WORLD CLASS HIGH-SPEED RAIL Washington to Boston in about three hours at up to 220 mph (354 kph)

Update of the Midwest Regional Rail Initiative. Tim Hoeffner Michigan Department of Transportation Director, Office of Rail Lansing, MI

I-26 Fixed Guideway Alternatives Analysis

Bi-County Transitway/ Bethesda Station Access Demand Analysis

STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Report

DFW HSR Station Plans People Movers Hyperloop

Roma McKenzie-Campbell Amtrak, Project Manager. Caroline Ducas VHB, Senior Transit Planner. Boston, Massachusetts

Regional Transit Extension Studies. Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization Passenger Rail Task Force Meeting December 17, 2013

Feasibility Study. Community Meeting March, North-South Commuter Rail Feasibility Study

High Speed Rail Conference

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Action 6A: HRTAC FY2018 FY2023 Funding Plan

East San Fernando Valley Transit Corridor. TAC Briefing December 4, 2013

A Business Case for Southeast High-Speed Rail

Southern California - CHSRA

I-20 EAST TRANSIT INITIATIVE Tier 1 and Tier 2 Alternatives Screening Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Proposed Downtown Miami Link

Point A Point B Point C Point D. Fulton County Board of Commissioners and Mayors Meeting December 14, 2017

Naval Station Norfolk Transit Extension Study. October 2014

FINAL. Sound Transit Long-Range Plan Update. Issue Paper S.1: Tacoma Link Integration with Central Link. Prepared for: Sound Transit

North Shore Alternatives Analysis. May 2012

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MAY 5, 2016

The Boston South Station HSIPR Expansion Project Cost-Benefit Analysis. High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Technical Appendix

Kenosha-Racine-Milwaukee (KRM)

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

PEACHTREE CORRIDOR PARTNERSHIP. Current Status & Next Steps

Public Meeting. City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development

BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY

Broward County Intermodal Center And People Mover. AASHTO Value Engineering Conference Presentation. September 1, 2009 San Diego, CA

The Screening and Selection of Regionally Significant Projects

Needs and Community Characteristics

Ohio Passenger Rail Development. Northwest Ohio Passenger Rail Association

Feasibility Study Update and Workshop Introduction

4.0 TIER 2 ALTERNATIVES

Transit Access to the National Harbor

THE WILSHIRE CORRIDOR: RAIL AND ITS ALTERNATIVES. Prepared By: Jacki Murdock Transportation and Environmental Planner

Planning of the HSR Network

Tier 2 Screening and Selection522. of the Short List Alternatives KISSIMMEE CORRIDOR. Downtown CRA. US 192 Alternatives Analysis

Chicago to St. Louis High-Speed Rail. IDOT District 8 Crossings. July 29, 2015

Proposed HRTAC FY2018 FY2023 Plan of Finance Update

APPENDIX I: [FIXED-GUIDEWAY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY]

Electromobility for Heavy-Duty Vehicles. Long Beach Convention Center, May 15-17, 2012 ACT Expo 2012

Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project Cost / Schedule Update

Richmond Area MPO Regional Priority Transportation Projects

CITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6

Halifax Commuter Rail Feasibility Study

Customer Services, Operations, and Safety Committee Board Information Item III-D May 13, 2010 Rail Fleet Plan

Geneva, 67th SC.2 Session October 2013 High Speed Trains Master Plan

D2 - CBD Second Alignment

Chicago Milwaukee Intercity Passenger Rail Corridor

VDOT Unused Facilities

San Francisco to San Jose Preliminary Alternatives Analysis

Transit Access Study

CEO REPORT FEBRUARY 2019

Caltrain Modernization EMU Procurement

Link LRT: Maintenance Bases, Vehicles and Operations for ST2 Expansion

Bedford/Franklin Regional Rail Initiative (BFRRI) Rationale for a Bedford Amtrak Station June 30, 2015

CITY OF ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 301 E. Huron St., P.O. Box 8647 Ann Arbor, Michigan

UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018

Background Information about the Metrobus 29 Lines Study

High-Speed Intercity Passenger Rail

DEVELOPMENT OF RIDERSHIP FORECASTS FOR THE SAN BERNARDINO INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT STUDY

Operating & Maintenance Cost Results Report

Restoration of Historic Streetcar Services in Downtown Los Angeles

6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Streetcar and Light Rail Design Differences. March 2015

Madison BRT Transit Corridor Study Proposed BRT Operations Plans

The Preferred Alternative: a Vision for Growth on the Northeast Corridor

PUBLIC MEETINGS. Winter TOPRS Winter 2014 Public Meeting Presentation

Staff Contact: Carlos de Melo, Community Development Director, (650)

Railroad Impact Study

Caltrain Downtown Extension Study Ridership Forecast Summary

RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVE REPORT

Chapter 7: Travel Demand Analysis. Chapter 8. Plan Scenarios. LaSalle Community Center. Image Credit: Town of LaSalle

The Eastern Connector Study November, 2007 planning for the future

Naval Station Norfolk Transit Extension Study. January 7, 2015

Meeting the Transportation Challenge in the Northeast

Develop ground transportation improvements to make the Airport a multi-modal regional

U.S. System Summary: CALIFORNIA

RTSP Phase II Update

Executive Summary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Parking Issues Trenton Downtown Parking Policy and Sidewalk Design Standards E.S. Page 1 Final Report 2008

Executive Summary. Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Priority Corridor Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis October 13, 2009.

Exhibit A Sound Transit Board Resolution R Selecting the bicycle, pedestrian, and parking access improvements to be built for the Puyallup

Independence Institute Denver West Parkway, Suite 185 Golden, Colorado i2i.org/cad.aspx BRT = BTR

Downtown Transit Connector. Making Transit Work for Rhode Island

NEW HAVEN-HARTFORD-SPRINGFIELD LINE HIGH SPEED INTERCITY RAIL PROJECT

Transcription:

Presentation To HRTPO Passenger Rail Task Force HRTPO Norfolk-Richmond Passenger Rail Operations Plan and Costs Presentation By December 17, 2013 Transportation Economics & Management Systems, Inc.

PHASE 2B WORK PLAN # Tasks 1 Project Management 2 Rail Alternatives 3 Ridership and Revenue - Forecasts Sensitivity Analysis 4 Rail Service Analysis 5 Operating and Capital Costs 6 Financial and Economic Analysis - Financial - Economic 7 Environmental Scan 8 Implementation Plan 9 Report M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 M8 M9 M10 M11 M12 MEETINGS PRESENTATIONS MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORTS 1

BACKGROUND/CONTEXT FOR THE OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS 2

HAMPTON ROADS CORRIDOR AS PART OF SEHSR 3

HOWEVER, THERE IS A GAP IN THE MIDDLE OF SEHSR Very Low Population Area 4

... AS A RESULT, IT HAS BEEN SUGGESTED THAT HAMPTON ROADS IS MORE FUNCTIONALLY DEPENDENT ON THE NEC THAN ON SEHSR The Hampton Roads Corridor has been divided into three segments for analysis purposes: 1. Washington DC to Richmond 2. Richmond to Newport News - Peninsula 3. Richmond to Norfolk - Southside 5

ORIGINALLY, DEVELOPMENT STEPS WERE DEFINED FOR BOTH THE PENINSULA AND SOUTH SIDE ROUTES Steps Route Max Speed No. of Trains Infrastructure Station Step 1 I-64/CSXT 79 mph 2 Shared Track Schedule Enhancement Main Street Newport News (existing) Route 460/ Norfolk Southern 79 mph 1-3 Shared Track NS Staples Mill Only Norfolk Step 2 (DEIS Alt 1) DRPT Focus I-64/CSXT 79 mph 3 Shared Track Route 460/ Norfolk Southern 79-90 mph * 4-6 Shared Track V Line Main Street Newport News (existing) Main Street Bowers Hill Step 3 HRTPO Focus I-64/CSXT 90 mph 4-6 Shared Track Route 460/ Norfolk Southern 110 mph 8-12 Dedicated Track V Line Main Street Newport News Downtown/Airport Main Street Bowers Hill Step 4 I-64/CSXT 110 mph 6-9 Dedicated Track Route 460/ Norfolk Southern 150 mph 12-16 Dedicated Electric Track V Line Main Street Newport News Downtown/Airport Main Street Bowers Hill *Note: Norfolk Southern (NS) does not permit passenger train maximum authorized speed in excess of 79-mph on any NS track. Where the V-line (former Virginian Railway) has existing freight services, maximum authorized speed for passenger trains will be 79-mph. Along the Algren Kenyon portion of the V-line (over which NS freight rail service has been formally abandoned), passenger rail planners may consider speeds above 79-mph. 6

SCHEDULES WERE DEVELOPED FOR THE WHOLE CORRIDOR FROM HAMPTON ROADS TO WASHINGTON D.C. Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 79-mph 79-mph 79-mph 90-mph 90-mph 110-mph 110-mph 150-mph Washington to Richmond 2:45 1 2:15 2 2:20 3 2:05 2:20 1:30 1:30 1:05 Richmond to Norfolk 1:48 1:48 5 1:10 0:55 Richmond to Newport News 1:25 1:25 1:13 0:52 Total 4:10 4:03 3:45 3:53 3:33 2:40 2:22 2:00 4 1 2:45 current Amtrak time to Main Street, 1:35 to Newport News 2 2:15 current Amtrak time to Staples Mill Road Station only, does not go to Main Street 3 2:20 to Main Street, train operates at 90 mph north of Richmond 4 2:00 proposed schedule objective for HSR electric service 5 1:48 at 79-mph Richmond to Norfolk Source: Exhibit B-6, Progress Report B, page B-13, 2010 study 7

BUT, RECENTLY THE FOCUS HAS BEEN ON REFINING PLAN FOR THE SOUTHSIDE SERVICE TO NORFOLK Steps Route Max Speed No. of Trains Infrastructure Station Step 3 Norfolk-Richmond along Route 460 110 mph 8-12 Dedicated Track V Line Main Street Bowers Hill Step 4 Norfolk-Richmond along Route 460 150 mph+ 12-16 Dedicated Electric Track V Line Main Street Bowers Hill Focus of the Study 8

TRAIN TECHNOLOGY HAS ADVANCED SINCE 2010! Diesel HrST 90-130 mph Business Model of the MWRRS Speeds up to 130-mph on dedicated high speed tracks; Tier I Compliant trains for Shared tracks in urban areas Low Center of Gravity Diesel Locomotives Passive Tilting Existing +New Alignment Because of Alternative Tier 1 Compliance, High Speed 220- mph electric trains can now share freight tracks at speeds under 125-mph the California Blended Operations model has also been adopted by Amtrak for the NEC. There is now only a single generic High Speed electric train and it can operate at 220-mph. The diesel train can operate up to 130-mph. NS policy prohibits shared operations above 79- mph, and a dedicated track could support 130-mph, so it makes sense to evaluate the diesel operation at that speed. Electric HST 160-220 mph Business Model of California HSR Speeds up to 220-mph on dedicated high speed tracks; Tier I Compliant trains for Shared tracks in urban areas Low Center of Gravity Electric Locomotives Passive Tilting Existing +New Alignment 9

HAMPTON ROADS TO WASHINGTON D.C. RAIL SERVICE ASSUMPTIONS* Washington D.C. to Richmond, 109 miles (Current Time 2:00, 79 mph): Assumes a new conceptual greenfield due to capacity and geometric limitation of existing ROW 130-mph diesel could easily achieve 1:30 on a greenfield an aggressive tilt train could achieve this time on the existing CSX alignment 220-mph electric could achieve 0:55 based on a high quality greenfield from Lorton to Richmond Richmond to Norfolk, 97-105 miles (Current Time 2:00, 79 mph): 13 daily round trips at 130-mph; 1:00 to 1:10 schedule times 22 daily round trips at 220-mph; 0:45 to 0:55 schedule times Richmond to Newport News, 75 miles (Current Time 1:25, 79 mph): 3 daily round trips at 79-mph; 1:25 schedule time OVERALL Cut Norfolk-Washington DC Time in half: 4 hours to 2 hours, 220 mph *Source: Proposed Detailed Operating Schedules follow in this presentation 10

SOUTHSIDE NORFOLK SERVICE: ROUTE OPTIONS UNDER DEVELOPMENT 11

SOUTHSIDE ROUTE OPTIONS COVER ALL THE BASES Route Options Under Analysis Existing Rail Northern and Southern Greenfields, via Petersburg and Hopewell Richmond Direct Greenfield Speeds Under Analysis 130-mph and 220-mph 12

COMMON SEGMENTS TO ALL OPTIONS Richmond Station All High Speed Options (either East Shore or I-295) approach from the East on an elevated Viaduct. Common Segment: Fulton Gas Works to Main Street Station Bowers Hill to Norfolk Harbor Park Common Segment: V Line and NS Main into downtown Norfolk 13

ROUTE OPTIONS UNDER ANALYSIS 14

ROUTE OPTION 1 VIA PETERSBURG Staples Mills Richmond-Main St. Hopewell-Fort Lee Williamsburg Petersburg-Ettrick Newport News-Airport Newport News-Amtrak Newport News-Downtown Bowers Hill Norfolk Suffolk 15

ROUTE OPTION 2 - VIA HOPEWELL Staples Mills Richmond-Main St. Hopewell-Fort Lee Williamsburg Petersburg-Ettrick Newport News-Airport Newport News-Amtrak Newport News-Downtown Bowers Hill Norfolk Suffolk 16

ROUTE OPTION 3 - RICHMOND DIRECT Staples Mills Richmond-Main St. Hopewell-Fort Lee Williamsburg Petersburg-Ettrick Newport News-Airport Newport News-Amtrak Newport News-Downtown Bowers Hill Norfolk Suffolk 17

SOUTHSIDE NORFOLK SERVICE: OPERATIONS PLAN DEVELOPMENT 18

INTERACTIVE INPUT INTERACTIVE ANALYSIS OUTPUT ANALYSIS APPROACH Service Plan Trains LOCOMOTION Scheduling & Operations Operating Costs Methodology for developing an optimized plan Infrastructure TRACKMAN Terminal Facilities Capital Costs Using the data that has already been collected in Phase 2A Market Analysis COMPASS Ridership & Fares Revenues Financial & Economic Feasibility 19

RICHMOND-WASHINGTON SCHEDULE TIMES Part of All Route Options Station 130-mph Diesel Super Express Express Local Richmond Main St 0:00 0:00 0:00 Ashland 0:12 Fredericksburg 0:40 0:45 Quantico 1:08 Alexandria 1:20 1:25 1:35 Washington Union 1:30 1:35 1:45 Station 220-mph Electric Super Express Express Local Richmond Main St 0:00 0:00 0:00 Ashland 0:10 Fredericksburg 0:25 0:30 Quantico 0:45 Alexandria 0:43 0:48 0:58 Washington Union 0:53 0:58 1:08 These times are consistent with the Step 4 times of 1:30 and 1:05 for Diesel and Electric options, respectively, from 2010 Progress Report B The 1:30 Diesel time can be done on the CSX alignment using aggressive tilt technology. The other times are based on conceptual route options only between Richmond and Washington DC 20

ROUTE OPTION 1: NORFOLK-WASHINGTON SCHEDULE TIMES VIA PETERSBURG Station 130-mph Diesel Super Express Express Local Norfolk 0:00 0:00 0:00 Bowers Hill 0:12 0:12 0:12 Suffolk 0:17 Petersburg 0:53 0:58 Richmond Main St 1:04 1:09 1:14 Washington Union 2:36 2:46 3:01 Station 220-mph Electric Super Express Express Local Norfolk 0:00 0:00 0:00 Bowers Hill 0:10 0:10 0:10 Suffolk 0:15 Petersburg 0:40 0:45 Richmond Main St 0:50 0:55 1:00 Washington Union 1:45 1:55 2:10 * Allowing 2 minutes for Richmond Station Stop Same time for Southern Greenfield or dedicated NS Option 21

LOCOMOTION RESULT: WASHINGTON DC TO NORFOLK Alt 1: Lorton-Richmond + East Shore + Southern Greenfields 1:40:36 unimpeded at 220-mph 250 200 Speed(mph) 150 100 Suffolk, Bowers Hill stop and the V-Line 50 Alexandria Stop; CSX Restrictions to Lorton 0 0.000 50.000 100.000 150.000 200.000 Milepost Richmond/ Petersburg Maximum Allowable Speed Maximum Attainable Speed 22

LOCOMOTION RESULT: WASHINGTON DC TO NORFOLK Alt 1: Lorton-Richmond + East Shore + Southern Greenfields 2:08:25 unimpeded at 130-mph 140 Speed(mph) 120 100 80 60 40 20 Alexandria Stop; CSX Restrictions to Lorton Suffolk, Bowers Hill stop and the V-Line Richmond/ Petersburg 0 0.000 50.000 100.000 150.000 200.000 Milepost Maximum Allowable Speed Maximum Attainable Speed 23

ROUTE OPTION 2: NORFOLK-WASHINGTON SCHEDULE TIMES VIA HOPEWELL 130-mph Diesel 220-mph Electric Station Super Express Express Local Station Super Express Express Local Norfolk 0:00 0:00 0:00 Bowers Hill 0:12 0:12 0:12 Suffolk 0:17 Hopewell 0:50 0:53 Richmond Main St 1:04 1:09 1:14 Washington Union 2:36 2:46 3:01 Norfolk 0:00 0:00 0:00 Bowers Hill 0:10 0:10 0:10 Suffolk 0:15 Hopewell 0:37 0:42 Richmond Main St 0:50 0:55 1:00 Washington Union 1:45 1:55 2:10 * Allowing 2 minutes for Richmond Station Stop Same time for Northern Greenfield or dedicated NS Option 24

LOCOMOTION RESULT: WASHINGTON DC TO NORFOLK Alt 2: Lorton-Richmond + I-295 + Northern Greenfields 1:40:30 unimpeded at 220-mph 250 200 Speed(mph) 150 100 Suffolk, Bowers Hill stop and the V-Line 50 Alexandria Stop; CSX Restrictions to Lorton 0 0.000 50.000 100.000 150.000 200.000 Milepost Richmond/ I-295 / Hopewell Maximum Allowable Speed Maximum Attainable Speed 25

LOCOMOTION RESULT: WASHINGTON DC TO NORFOLK Alt 2: Lorton-Richmond + I-295 + Northern Greenfields 2:07:19 unimpeded at 130-mph 140 Speed(mph) 120 100 80 60 Suffolk, Bowers Hill stop and the V-Line 40 20 Alexandria Stop; CSX Restrictions to Lorton Richmond/ I-295 / Hopewell 0 0.000 50.000 100.000 150.000 200.000 Milepost Maximum Allowable Speed Maximum Attainable Speed 26

ROUTE OPTION 3: NORFOLK-WASHINGTON SCHEDULE TIMES VIA RICHMOND DIRECT 130-mph Diesel 220-mph Electric Station Super Express Express Local Norfolk 0:00 0:00 0:00 Bowers Hill 0:12 0:12 0:12 Suffolk 0:17 Richmond Main St 0:59 0:59 1:04 Washington Union 2:31 2:36 2:51 Station Super Express Express Local Norfolk 0:00 0:00 0:00 Bowers Hill 0:10 0:10 0:10 Suffolk 0:15 Richmond Main St 0:43 0:43 0:48 Washington Union 1:38 1:43 1:58 * Allowing 2 minutes for Richmond Station Stop These times are consistent with the Step 3 and 4 times of 2:40 and 2:00 for Diesel and Electric options, respectively, from 2010 Progress Report B Times are based on conceptual route options only between Richmond and Washington DC 27

LOCOMOTION RESULT: WASHINGTON DC TO NORFOLK Alt 3: Lorton-Richmond + Richmond Direct Greenfields 1:31:10 unimpeded at 220-mph 250 200 Speed(mph) 150 100 Suffolk, Bowers Hill stop and the V-Line 50 Alexandria Stop; CSX Restrictions to Lorton 0 0.000 50.000 100.000 150.000 200.000 Milepost Richmond Maximum Allowable Speed Maximum Attainable Speed 28

LOCOMOTION RESULT: WASHINGTON DC TO NORFOLK Alt 3: Lorton-Richmond + Richmond Direct Greenfields 1:59:57 unimpeded at 130-mph 140 Speed(mph) 120 100 80 60 Suffolk, Bowers Hill stop and the V-Line 40 20 Alexandria Stop; CSX Restrictions to Lorton Richmond 0 0.000 50.000 100.000 150.000 200.000 Milepost Maximum Allowable Speed Maximum Attainable Speed 29

SUMMARY OF NORFOLK TO WASHINGTON D.C. HIGH SPEED TRAIN SCHEDULE RESULTS Stations Super Express Express Local Norfolk Bowers Hill Suffolk Petersburg/Hopewell* Richmond Main St Ashland Fredericksburg Quantico Alexandria Washington Union 130-mph Total Trains 4 trains 5 trains 4 trains 130-mph Time via Petersburg/Hopewell 2:36 2:46 3:01 130-mph Time Richmond Direct 2:31 2:36 2:51 220-mph Total Trains 6 trains 12 trains 4 trains 220-mph Time via Petersburg/Hopewell 1:45 1:55 2:10 220-mph Time Richmond Direct 1:38 1:43 1:58 * Stations Bypassed by Richmond Direct 30

SUMMARY OF NORFOLK TO WASHINGTON D.C. HIGH SPEED TRAIN SCHEDULE COMPARISON The performance of the 130-mph and 220-mph options both depend on the characteristics of the option that is ultimately developed between Richmond and Washington D.C. The 130-mph diesel would likely operate between 1:05 and 1:30 The 220-mph electric would likely operate between 0:55 and 1:30 The schedule times of all four route options are very close. The results of this more detailed assessment support the findings of the earlier 2010 study, Progress Report B. Petersburg and Hopewell route options have the same times. These route options are 5 minutes slower than Richmond Direct, plus an additional 5 minutes if they add a stop. This time difference is not enough to drive major differences in ridership between the options. The route selection will likely be made based on cost, environmental factors and route synergies. 31

OPERATING COSTS 32

OPERATING COST CATEGORIES Drivers Train Miles Cost Categories Equipment Maintenance Energy and Fuel Train and Engine Crews Onboard Service Crews Passenger Miles Insurance Liability Ridership and Revenue Sales and Marketing Fixed Cost Service Administration Track and ROW Maintenance Station Costs Costs were developed for four rail technologies 79-mph convention diesel 130-mph High Speed diesel 150-mph and 220-mph High Speed electric 33

SUMMARY OF OPERATING COSTS Unit Cost Driver Greenfield 130-mph diesel Greenfield 220-mph electric Equipment Maintenance Train-Miles $12.70 $14.08 Train Crew* Train-Miles $4.92 $4.60 Fuel or Energy* Train-Miles $8.71 $2.80 On Board Services (Labor)* Train-Miles $2.56 $2.41 On Board Services (Goods Sold) * % of OBS 50% 50% Revenue Insurance Passenger-Mile 1.4 1.4 Track (Shared) Train-Miles over N/A N/A Shared Track Track and Electrification (Dedicated) Dedicated Track Miles $27,924 plus Cyclic Capital $54,783 plus Cyclic Capital Operations and Dispatch* Train-Miles 50.8 50.8 Stations* Staffed and $6.45 mill $6.45 mill Unstaffed Stations Administration and Management (Fixed)* Fixed $14.35 mill $14.35 mill Administration and Management Train-Miles $1.84 $1.84 (Call Center: Variable Train-Miles)* Administration and Management Riders 70.9 70.9 (Call Center: Variable Riders) Credit Card and Travel Agency Commissions* Percent of 2.8% 2.8% Revenue Operator Profit Markup Selected (*) Costs 10% 10% *This cost is included in the operator profit 10 percent markup 34

FIRST CUT CONSOLIDATED OPERATING RESULTS Financial 2025(mill. 2012$) Southern Option 1 - Via Petersburg Northern Option 2 - Via Hopewell Southern Option 1A - Greenfield Southern Option 1B - Norfolk Southern Northern Option 2A - Greenfield Northern Option 2B - Norfolk Southern Option 3 - Richmond Direct 130 mph 220 mph 130 mph 220 mph 130 mph 220 mph 130 mph 220 mph 130 mph 220 mph REVENUE Ticket Revenue $194.73 $330.95 $194.73 $330.95 $190.90 $322.52 $190.90 $322.52 $202.58 $334.25 OBS Revenue 8% $15.58 $26.48 $15.58 $26.48 $15.27 $25.80 $15.27 $25.80 $16.21 $26.74 Total Revenue $210.30 $357.43 $210.30 $357.43 $206.17 $348.32 $206.17 $348.32 $218.79 $360.99 COSTS Train Crew $10.83 $15.67 $10.83 $15.67 $10.71 $15.26 $10.71 $15.26 $11.10 $15.69 OBS $13.42 $21.45 $13.42 $21.45 $13.21 $20.90 $13.21 $20.90 $13.88 $21.59 Equipment $27.96 $47.95 $27.96 $47.95 $27.65 $46.72 $27.65 $46.72 $28.65 $48.03 Fuel $19.57 $8.92 $19.57 $8.92 $19.35 $8.69 $19.35 $8.69 $20.06 $8.94 Track $11.95 $23.45 $11.95 $23.45 $11.78 $23.12 $11.78 $23.12 $11.56 $22.68 Insurance $7.40 $11.44 $7.40 $11.44 $7.32 $11.15 $7.32 $11.15 $7.58 $11.46 Call Ctr Variable $2.65 $3.82 $2.65 $3.82 $2.62 $3.71 $2.62 $3.71 $2.77 $3.94 T-Agent and CC Comm $5.45 $9.27 $5.45 $9.27 $5.35 $9.03 $5.35 $9.03 $5.67 $9.36 Stations $6.45 $6.45 $6.45 $6.45 $6.45 $6.45 $6.45 $6.45 $5.91 $5.91 Admin and Mgt $18.40 $20.62 $18.40 $20.62 $18.36 $20.46 $18.36 $20.46 $18.50 $20.63 Operation & Dispactch $1.09 $1.70 $1.09 $1.70 $1.07 $1.67 $1.07 $1.67 $1.05 $1.64 Operator Profit 10% selected items $7.79 $8.79 $7.79 $8.79 $7.71 $8.62 $7.71 $8.62 $7.89 $8.77 Total Cost $132.95 $179.51 $132.95 $179.51 $131.57 $175.77 $131.57 $175.77 $134.63 $178.63 Operating Surplus $77.35 $177.92 $77.35 $177.92 $74.60 $172.55 $74.60 $172.55 $84.16 $182.36 Operating Ratio 1.58 1.99 1.58 1.99 1.57 1.98 1.57 1.98 1.63 2.02 35

THANK YOU 36