CIMAC Position Paper

Similar documents
ECO optimization with NOx equipment

Bunker Fuel Quality: 2020 Outlook North of England P&I Athens, November

ULSFO (0.10) and RM (VLSFO) Category Potential future trends

CIRCULAR IMO FAQ on the sulphur limits in Emission Control Areas (ECAs)

Fuels Sulphur Cap. Vice President, Marine Sales Americas Daniel Vengel Jensen SEAM Les Gingell. 29 th of June 2018

LNG. DME Ethane. Coal Slurry MSAR. Biofuel ULSFO (Ultra Low Sulphur Fuel Oil) Methanol Glycerine Hydrogen

USE OF MDO BY SHIPS THE RATIONAL BEHIND THE PROPOSAL

IEA Bioenergy ExCo78 workshop Biofuel supply to Interislander

NORTH AMERICAN ECA AND NEW FUEL SULFUR CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

CIMAC Guideline

Bunker Summit Greece. Monique Vermeire Athens. 10 May, 2007

Refining impact of the IMO bunker fuel sulphur decision

Bunkering With New Fuels Building on Strong Foundations.

Regulatory update on implementation of the 0.50% sulphur limit for international shipping

GUIDANCE ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF A SHIP IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR THE CONSISTENT IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 0.50% SULPHUR LIMIT UNDER MARPOL ANNEX VI

A multi-fuel future: the impact of the IMO sulphur cap

GUIDELINES FOR USE OF LOW SULPHUR FUEL OILS IN SHIPS

1 COPYRIGHT 2018, LUBES N GREASES MAGAZINE. REPRODUCED WITH PERMISSION FROM THE MAY 2018 ISSUE

MARITIME GLOBAL SULPHUR CAP. Know the different choices and challenges for on-time compliance SAFER, SMARTER, GREENER

Recommendation for petroleum fuel treatment systems for marine diesel engines

Neste. Cimac Cascades 2017 Helsinki. Teemu Sarjovaara, D.Sc.(Tech) Neste R&D, Products

Marine fuels in the low-sulphur era

Consistent implementation of the 2020 sulphur limit and work to further address GHG emissions from international shipping

10K98MC-C and 6S35MC on the same Testbed

MARTOB Application of low sulphur marine fuels New challenges for the Marine Industry. Kjell Olav Skjølsvik MARINTEK

Marine Fuel Management. Mark Pearson ASGL Marine Fuel Manager Athens, 9 April 2014

METHANOL AS A MARINE FUEL A SAFE, COST EFFECTIVE, CLEAN-BURNING, WIDELY AVAILABLE MARINE FUEL FOR TODAY AND THE FUTURE

Official Journal of the European Union

ISO 8217:2010 Dr.r.Vis, Viswa Lab

The road leading to the 0.50% sulphur limit and IMO s role moving forward

INDUSTRY'S PERSPECTIVE ON THE COMPLIANCE WITH THE LOW SULPHUR REQUIREMENTS. Pulp and paper industries' views and assessment

Lean and clean dredging for a better future

Implementation of SECA rules in the Baltic countries

Meeting ECA requirements a new challenge & a new opportunity

Systems and Arrangement for Meeting Regulations in Emission Control Areas (ECA)

L.A. Maritime describes the operation of Aquametro Fuel-Switching Devices

Press Release. CIMAC Circle at SMM 2008 takes on emissions issue. October 2008

Marine Heavy Fuel Oils - Problems and Alternatives -

IMO 2020 Minimizing operational risks due to compliance. Sachin Gupta Business Manager Water & Oil Solutions

Outlook for Marine Bunkers and Fuel Oil to A key to understanding the future of marine bunkers and fuel oil markets

THE REPUBLIC OF LIBERIA Liberia Maritime Authority

Global Sulfur Cap

Common Rail Injection for CAT MaK Engines

Recent and current developments in the regulation of air pollution from ships

Marine Fuels & Environment

CIMAC Position Paper

Module 5 Propulsion and Power Generation of LNG driven Vessels (23 th November to 27 th November University of Piraeus, Greece)

Future Marine Fuel Quality Changes: How might terminals prepare?

2020 Sulphur Cap. Challenges and Opportunities. Delivering Maritime Solutions.

APPLICATION OF MARPOL 73/78 ANNEX VI TO EXISTING SHIPS

ABS Notes. Use of Low Sulphur Marine Fuel for Boilers

2020 GLOBAL SULPHUR LIMIT HISTORY, CURRENT STATUS, AND THE INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION S (IMO S) WORK PLAN FOR EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION

Tough times. New technologies, new regulations, new fuels. A simple solution in A complex environment

TRANSPACIFIC CUSTOMER ADVISORY Implementation of New BAF Formula Effective January 01, 2019

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Fuel handling. in Emission Controlled Areas

Workshop on GHG Emission On Ships Co-organised by CIL and MPA

Going the Dual Fuel Route

Index 1. ISO 8217 :

AUTORIDAD MARÍTIMA DE PANAMÁ

AIR POLLUTION AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY. Guidelines for onboard sampling and the verification of the sulphur content of the fuel oil used on board ships

LNG: Legal and regulatory framework. Canepa Monica World Maritime University

ECA Compliance & PM. Thomas Kirk Director of Environmental Programs. Ottawa, Canada 9 September 2014

Shell Alexia S4. Proven performance under tough conditions. Shell Marine Products

IMO 2020 & Marine Fuels An Oil Major s Viewpoint

TECHNICAL BULLETIN. Oct Applicability: All Brightoil clients ISO 8217:2010 VS ISO 8217:2010 Major Changes

Marine Environmental Protection Committee IMO MEPC 62 July 2011

Commercial Marine Presentation

Trade Logistics and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development

VISCOPLEX Crude Oil Paraffin Inhibitors (COPIs) improve efficiency

GASEOUS FUELS SAFETY ASPECTS

Strategy Green Shipping Summit

Global Greenship, September 2009 Low Sulfur Fuel and Emissions Advances

Working together for a safer world

International Maritime Organisation: upcoming decisions ppoev Mr. Loukas Kontogiannis

SCR under pressure - pre-turbocharger NOx abatement for marine 2-stroke diesel engines

Meeting the Future of Combustion Engines

taro cylinder lubricants

SOx scrubbers Engine Makers view MDT points, markets and Tier III combinations. Greener Shipping Summit Jesper Arvidsson

Regulatory requirements towards liquid fuels to be used on dual-fuel (DF) engines, including pilot fuels

Fuel oil availability review for international shipping

The daily grind Cat fines and engine wear, Part 2

New Regulatory Environment

WÄRTSILÄ 2-STROKE LOW PRESSURE DUAL-FUEL ENGINES

Cylinder Condition. What will the future bring. 07 November 2018

VISCOPLEX crude oil paraffin inhibitors improve efficiency

INTERTANKO Documentary Committee Bunker 2020

Frequently Asked Questions on the At Berth requirements

Reducing Exhaust Emissions from Wärtsilä Marine Engines Moottoritekniikan seminaari Teknologiateollisuus ry 18 May 2010 Göran Hellén

IUMI Policy Agenda. 6. Fuels. 30 October Brief description

MARPOL Annex VI prevention of air pollution from ships

Sampling & Test Accuracy under the umbrella of emissions legislation

Article: The Formation & Testing of Sludge in Bunker Fuels By Dr Sunil Kumar Laboratory Manager VPS Fujairah 15th January 2018

Technical Publication. Guidelines for the development of ship's Data Collection Plan (SEEMP Part II) /

Fuel Quality Directive

Case study -MARPOL emission standards ECA Compliance. Your Trusted Partner

Residual Fuel Market Issues

MAN Diesel SEA-Mate Onboard Blending and Fluid Analysis Systems

VISCOBASE Synthetic Base Fluids ECONOMICAL SOLUTIONS FOR HIGH-PERFORMANCE AUTOMOTIVE AND INDUSTRIAL GEAR OILS

The Voice of International Merchant Shipping

Transcription:

06 2015 CIMAC Position Paper New 0.10% sulphur marine (ECA) fuels Introduced to the market to meet the SO x ECA fuel sulphur specification of maximum 0.10% By CIMAC WG7 Fuels This publication is only for guidance and gives an introduction to the technical and commercial considerations related to the new marine fuels that are entering the market. It neither claims to cover any aspect of the matter, nor does it reflect all legal aspects in detail. It is not meant to, and cannot, replace own knowledge of the pertaining directives, laws and regulations. Furthermore the specific characteristics of the individual products and the various possible applications have to be taken into account. This is why, apart from the assessments and procedures addressed in this guide, many other scenarios may apply. The first edition of this CIMAC Position Paper was approved by the members of the CIMAC WG7 Fuels in June 2015.

Content 1 Summary... 3 2 Introduction... 3 3 New fuels with maximum 0.10% sulphur... 3 3.1 Some common characteristics of the new 0.10% sulphur fuels... 4 3.2 Key technical considerations for ship owners and operators... 4 3.3 Key commercial considerations for ship owners and operators... 5 4 Conclusion... 5 CIMAC position paper, New 0.10% sulphur marine (ECA) fuels, 2015-06 (1 st edition) Page 2

1 Summary New 0.10% sulphur (S) marine fuels recently introduced in the market offer an economically attractive alternative to conventional distillate fuels such as DMA. Before purchasing a new fuel product, operators should carefully consider the specific technical and operational challenges this fuel may have and where necessary, contact the fuel supplier or OEM for the considerations to be made to ensure safe operation. 2 Introduction Legislative changes on the 1st of January 2015 require ships operating in SOx Emission Control Areas (ECA) to reduce their sulphur oxide (SO x ) emissions. The SO x ECA s currently included are the Baltic Sea, The North Sea, the English Channel and waters within 200 nautical miles from the coast of USA, the coastal waters around Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands (the US Caribbean ECA) and Canada. The latest IMO SOx requirements can be met by using fuel with a sulphur content of maximum 0.10% or by equivalent means such as using an exhaust gas cleaning system. Alternative fuels (methanol, LNG, biofuels) and systems are available to ensure compliance, however these are still at an early stage of their development and feasibility limited by logistical, technological, and/or sustainability factors. 3 New fuels with maximum 0.10% sulphur Traditional marine distillate fuel, referred to as marine gasoil or DMA, today is the most widely available 0.10% sulphur marine fuel and expected to be the main fuel used in SO x ECA s from 1st Jan 2015 onwards; already more than 70% of marine distillate fuels (DMA, DMB) supplied in the main bunker ports have a sulphur content below 0.10%. To meet the increased demand for 0.10% S marine fuel, several fuel suppliers have, however, developed new fuel formulations that are claimed to be more cost effective than conventional distillate fuels such as DMA. Several of these fuels combine properties of both distillate and residual marine fuels. These new fuels can broadly be divided in the following categories; ultra low sulphur residual fuel oils; Typically, these fuels have lower viscosity and density, and better ignition and combustion properties compared with conventional residual marine fuels. blends of a distillate fuel with small amount of residual fuel oil (DMB type) heavy distillates; fuels with low metal content but with higher viscosity than conventional DMA As every fuel supplier has designed its own unique formulation, properties of the new 0.10% sulphur fuels currently seen in the market vary significantly, which means that each fuel has its own specifics in terms of storing, handling and using the fuel. However, due to these fuels only recently being launched, there is limited experience in their use at this time. The International Council on Combustion Engines (CIMAC) recognizes this and has recently initiated a working group with technical experts from the industry (ship owners, OEMs, fuel suppliers, testing agencies) to address this and collate information in order to develop a technical guide predominantly for ship owners, operators and fuel buyers. CIMAC position paper, New 0.10% sulphur marine (ECA) fuels, 2015-06 (1 st edition) Page 3

3.1 Some common characteristics of the new 0.10% sulphur fuels Compatibility and stability o While there is always a risk of incompatibility when different fuels are being mixed, most of the new fuels are more paraffinic and consequently carry an increased risk of incompatibility with conventional residual fuels. Note that there is a similar risk when conventional DMA is mixed with conventional residual fuel. Viscosity of the new fuels is generally lower than conventional residual fuel grades RMG and RMK but higher than DMA, which means they may require heating. Compared with conventional DMA there may be a reduced risk of thermal shock during change over however operators should, as always, ensure that temperature gradients do not exceed the recommended max 2 C/min. Density of the new fuels is in general lower than conventional residual fuels. This may require adjustment of centrifuges to ensure adequate cleaning of the fuel. The new fuels generally have excellent ignition quality. Pour point of the new fuels varies significantly. In some cases, pour point exceeds limits stated in ISO8217 for DM and RM grades. The general rule is that fuels should be stored at min 10 C above pour point (Note: pour point indicates temperature below which the fuel does not flow). These fuels may have different cold flow characteristics than conventional fuels and relying only on pour point is not sufficient to ensure problem-free operation (reference is made to CIMAC Guideline 01. 2015, Cold flow properties of marine fuel oils http://www.cimac.com/working-groups/wg7-fuels/index.html). Cat fines and sediment content are typically lower than that of conventional residual fuel. Some of these new fuels are free of cat fines whereas others contain only small amounts of cat fines. In order to protect the engine, the general recommendation is to use the ship s residual fuel treatment system to clean the fuel. 3.2 Key technical considerations for ship owners and operators Ship tank configuration and fuel system o The viscosity of most of these new fuels is such that they cannot be used in distillate fuel-only systems and machinery as they require heating for cleaning and combustion. A fully segregated fuel system for both residual fuels and these new fuels is recommended to minimize risk of incompatibility and formation of sludge when switching from conventional residual fuels to the new fuel and vice-versa. o Note: Tank cleaning is recommended when using a residual fuel tank for storing these new fuels. This is to prevent sludge that has built up in these tanks from entering the fuel system. Heating requirements Due to the cold flow properties of most of these new fuels, permanent heating of the fuel may be necessary to minimize the risk of wax formation, also in storage. This is especially important in colder regions. Fuel treatment system o Some of these new fuels may contain cat fines and/or sediments and therefore need onboard cleaning. o Separator temperature and settings should be adjusted to the fuels viscosity and density. Please refer to recommendations from OEM and fuel supplier. CIMAC position paper, New 0.10% sulphur marine (ECA) fuels, 2015-06 (1 st edition) Page 4

o Note: Considering that many of these new fuels have lower viscosities compared to conventional residual fuels, care should be taken to ensure no overheating occurs. Fuel change-over procedures for switching between new and conventional residual fuels are essentially not different compared to switching between conventional DMA and residual fuel; controlled change-over minimizes risk of thermal shock on equipment and fuel incompatibility. The higher viscosity of many of these new fuels may even reduce the risk of thermal shock compared with conventional DMA. Lubrication o Two-stroke engines: the normal cylinder lubrication recommendation is to use high- BN cylinder oil (70-100 BN) when operating on high-sulphur fuels and low-bn cylinder oil (15-40 BN) when operating on low-sulphur fuel products. The same lubrication recommendations apply for new fuels as for conventional low sulphur DMA, i.e. use low BN cylinder lube oils and operate at the lowest recommended cylinder lube oil dosage in order to avoid complications with deposits building-up. Please refer to OEM recommendations. o Four-stroke engines: For longer term continuous operation on low sulphur fuels a change of system oil to a lower BN may be required. 3.3 Key commercial considerations for ship owners and operators Apart from technical considerations, fuel availability is also important. Fuel buyers should have a bunkering strategy in place that considers tank capacity and configuration to the operating profile of the vessel. Some of the new fuels are only available in one specific region and cannot be sourced in other areas. Although the new fuel types are produced to meet the max. 0.10% sulphur requirement for use within SO x ECA they do not always fit fully into either the table 1 or table 2 grades of the ISO 8217 specification. They can however be divided between being a predominantly residual marine based blend product (RM) or predominantly distillate marine (DM) blend product, essentially those containing residual components and those not. The ISO 8217 specification, however, still provides a very good basis to order against. It should be ensured however that any exceptions to the nominated ISO 8217 grade are clearly stated; these exceptions to be based on the available specification data from the fuel supplier. 4 Conclusion In conclusion, these new 0.10% sulphur fuels offer an economically attractive alternative to conventional distillate fuels such as DMA. Before purchasing a new fuel product however, operators should carefully consider the specific technical and operational challenges this type of fuel may have and where necessary, contact the fuel supplier or OEM for the considerations to be made to ensure safe operation. CIMAC position paper, New 0.10% sulphur marine (ECA) fuels, 2015-06 (1 st edition) Page 5

Imprint CIMAC Central Secretariat c/o VDMA e. V. Lyoner Strasse 18 60528 Frankfurt, Germany Phone +49 69 6603-1355 Fax +49 69 6603-2355 E-mail: info@cimac.com President: Christoph Teetz Secretary General: Peter Müller-Baum Copyright The CIMAC Central Secretariat. All rights reserved. All contents, including texts, photographs, graphics, and the arrangements thereof are protected by copyright and other laws protecting intellectual property. The contents of this document may not be copied, distributed, modified for commercial purposes. In addition, some contents are subject to copyrights held by third parties. The intellectual property is protected by various laws, such as patents, trademarks and copyrights held by CIMAC members or others. CIMAC is the International Council on Combustion Engines, a worldwide non-profit association consisting of National and Corporate Members in 25 countries in America, Asia and Europe. The organisation was founded in 1951 to promote technical and scientific knowledge in the field of large internal combustion engines (piston engines and gas turbines) for ship propulsion, power generation and rail traction. This is achieved by the organisation of Congresses, CIMAC Circles, and other (including local) CIMAC events, and by Working Group activities including the publication of CIMAC Recommendations and other documents. CIMAC is supported by engine manufacturers, engine users, technical universities, research institutes, component suppliers, fuel and lubricating oil suppliers, classification societies, and several other interested parties. For further information about our organisation please visit our website at http://www.cimac.com. CIMAC position paper, New 0.10% sulphur marine (ECA) fuels, 2015-06 (1 st edition) Page 6