AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER 2017 FILING FERC FORM 715 ANNUAL TRANSMISSION PLANNING AND EVALUATION REPORT PART 4 TRANSMISSION PLANNING RELIABILITY CRITERIA

Similar documents
SPS Planning Criteria and Study Methodology

DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PLANNING SUMMARY

TRANSMISSION PLANNING CRITERIA

Interconnection Feasibility Study Report GIP-222-FEAS-R3

Midway/Monument Area TTC Study

Interconnection Feasibility Study Report GIP-226-FEAS-R3

Generator Interconnection System Impact Study For

Interconnection Feasibility Study Report GIP-084-FEAS-R2

PID 274 Feasibility Study Report 13.7 MW Distribution Inter-Connection Buras Substation

Georgia Transmission Corporation Georgia Systems Operations Corporation

CHAPTER 25. SUBSTANTIVE RULES APPLICABLE TO ELECTRIC SERVICE PROVIDERS.

SYSTEM IMPACT STUDY EC300W ERIS FINAL REPORT. El Paso Electric Company

Q95 Vicksburg 69kV. System Impact Study. APS Contract No Arizona Public Service Company Transmission Planning.

El PASO ELECTRIC COMPANY 2014 BULK ELECTRIC SYSTEM TRANSMISSION ASSESSMENT FOR YEARS

Standard Authorization Request Form Regional Standard or Variance Texas Reliability Entity, Inc.

ATTACHMENT Y STUDY REPORT

PJM Generator Interconnection Request Queue #R60 Robison Park-Convoy 345kV Impact Study September 2008

Generator Interconnection Facilities Study For SCE&G Two Combustion Turbine Generators at Hagood

Western Area Power Administration Sierra Nevada Region

INTERCONNECTED POWER SYSTEMS POWER GRIDS. Chapter 8

Feasibility Study Report

EL PASO ELECTRIC COMPANY (EPE) FACILITIES STUDY FOR PROPOSED HVDC TERMINAL INTERCONNECTION AT NEW ARTESIA 345 KV BUS

FERC 101 for Environmental Lawyers. Linda L. Walsh Hunton & Williams LLP February 11, 2015

Project #148. Generation Interconnection System Impact Study Report

VACAR STABILITY STUDY OF PROJECTED 2014/2015 WINTER PEAK LOAD CONDITIONS

Interconnection System Impact Study Report Request # GI

SYSTEM IMPACT RESTUDY H252W ERIS REPORT. El Paso Electric Company

Interconnection Feasibility Study Report GIP-157-FEAS-R2

A Case Study on Aggregate Load Modeling in Transient Stability Studies

Q217 Generator Interconnection Project

INTERCONNECTION STANDARDS FOR PARALLEL OPERATION OF SMALL-SIZE GENERATING FACILITIES KILOWATTS IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY

Sub Regional RTEP Committee - Southern. August 19, 2011

S o u t h w e s t P o w e r P o o l D i s t u r b a n c e P e r f o r m a n c e R e q u i r e m e n t s. Revision 3.0

Interconnection Feasibility Study Report GIP-369-FEAS-R1

Interconnection Feasibility Study Report GIP-023-FEAS-R1. Generator Interconnection Request # MW Wind Generating Facility Inverness (L6549), NS

System Impact Study Report

Merchant Transmission Interconnection PJM Impact Study Report. PJM Merchant Transmission Request Queue Position X3-028.

Generation Interconnection Feasibility Study For XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX MW generator at new Western Refinary Substation

DETOUR GOLD CORPORATION SYSTEM IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR DETOUR LAKE PROJECT

Southwest Power Pool, Inc TPL Stability Study. MAINTAINED BY SOUTHWEST POWER POOL ENIGINEERING GROUP Modeling Group

Journal of American Science 2015;11(11) Integration of wind Power Plant on Electrical grid based on PSS/E

Emera Maine Representative: Jeffrey Fenn, P.E., SGC Engineering LLC

Feasibility Study Report

Western Area Power Administration Sierra Nevada Region

Ancillary Services & Essential Reliability Services

Industry Recommendation Loss of Solar Resources during Transmission Disturbances due to Inverter Settings - II

Emera Maine Representative: Jeffrey Fenn, P.E., SGC Engineering LLC

Net Metering Interconnection Requirements

Elbert County 500 MW Generation Addition Interconnection Feasibility Study Report OASIS POSTING # GI

Interconnection Feasibility Study Report Request # GI Draft Report 600 MW Wind Generating Facility Missile Site 230 kv Substation, Colorado

Rogers Road to Clubhouse 230kV New Transmission Line April 1, 2016

GENERAL DIRECTION SOUGHT AND SPECIFIC QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) ) )

Transmission Coordination and Planning Committee 2014 Q4 Stakeholder Meeting. December 18, 2014

Guide. Services Document No: GD-1401 v1.0. Issue Date: Title: WIND ISLANDING. Previous Date: N/A. Author: Heather Andrew.

Transmission Competitive Solicitation Questions Log Question / Answer Matrix Harry Allen to Eldorado 2015

FIRSTENERGY S PROPOSED SOLUTION AND REQUEST FOR CONSTRUCTION DESIGNATION

SERTP - 1 st Quarter Meeting

PJM Generator Interconnection R81 Emilie (Fords Mill) MW Impact Study Re-Study

OCTOBER 17, Emera Maine Representative: Jeffrey Fenn, P.E., LR/SGC Engineering LLC

Reliability Standards Disturbance Monitoring Conference July 30-31, 2013 Tempe, AZ August 6-7, 2013 Atlanta, GA Day 1

100 MW Wind Generation Project

Proposed New ISO Rules Section Version 2.0 Generating Unit Technical Requirements ( New ISO Rules Section Version 2.

A member-consumer with a QF facility shall not participate in the Cooperative s electric heat rate program.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

2012 LOCAL TRANSMISSION PLAN:

Targeted Application of STATCOM Technology in the Distribution Zone

Interconnection Feasibility Study Report GIP-IR373-FEAS-R1

Wheeler Ridge Junction Substation Project Description and Functional Specifications for Competitive Solicitation

1065 Woodman Drive Twelfth Revised Sheet No. T8 Dayton, Ohio Page 1 of 5

EPRI HVDC Research. Gary Sibilant, EPRI. August 30, 2011

Reliability Analysis Update

Main Transmission System Planning Guideline

THE NECESSITY OF THE 500 KV SYSTEM IN NWE S TRANSMISSION SYSTEM TO MAINTAIN RELIABLE SERVICE TO MONTANA CUSTOMERS

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX TRANSMISSION/GENERATION FEASIBILITY STUDY FATAL FLAW AND FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS

Jemena Electricity Networks (Vic) Ltd

Supplement to ISO Transmission Plan. Harry Allen-Eldorado Project Description and Functional Specifications

WIRES University Overview of ISO/RTOs. Mike Ross Senior Vice President Government Affairs and Public Relations Southwest Power Pool

Interconnection Guidelines For Transmission Interconnected Producer-Owned Generation 20 MW or less

Understanding the National Power Grid and How it Impacts Timeframes for Power Restoration

IEEE T&D FACTS Panel Session Part II (08TD0140) Wednesday, April 23, 2008

Sub Regional RTEP Committee Mid-Atlantic

Maddox Creek to Southwest Lima 345kV New Transmission Line November 15, 2016

Interconnection System Impact Study Final Report February 19, 2018

SECTION 9: ELECTRICAL POWER DISTRIBUTION. ESE 470 Energy Distribution Systems

Connection Engineering Study Report for AUC Application: AESO Project # 1674

Supplemental Report on the NCTPC Collaborative Transmission Plan

EL PASO ELECTRIC COMPANY (EPE) GENERATOR INTERCONNECTION SYSTEM IMPACT STUDY FOR PROPOSED XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX GENERATION ON THE AMRAD-ARTESIA 345 KV

Feasibility Study. Customer Kingman Area Photovoltaic Generation Project Interconnection

Reliability Analysis Update

Net Metering Interconnection Requirements. Customer Generation Capacity Not Exceeding 100 kw. Date: Version: 1

Gateway South Transmission Project

ELG4125: Flexible AC Transmission Systems (FACTS)

Electric Power Transmission: Research Needs to Sustain a Critical National Infrastructure

APPENDIX I: Description and Functional Specifications for Transmission Facilities Eligible for Competitive Solicitation

Solar Development in New Jersey, and PV Impacts on the Distribution System Carnegie Mellon Conference on the Electricity Industry - March 9, 2011

March 2017 to June 2017 Preliminary Interconnection Cluster Window System Impact Study 49.9 MW IA-PNM May 2018

1SPP Notification to Construct. RE: Notification to Construct Approved Reliability Network Upgrades

Texas A&M Microgrid and Electrical System Study. Cushing Memorial Library & Archives

THE TRES AMIGAS PROJECT

Transcription:

AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER 2017 FILING FERC FORM 715 ANNUAL TRANSMISSION PLANNING AND EVALUATION REPORT PART 4 TRANSMISSION PLANNING RELIABILITY CRITERIA AEP Texas (comprised of its Central and North Divisions and ETT are all members of the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT), and as a condition of membership have agreed to conform to all approved and applicable ERCOT and North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) Reliability Standards (NERC Standards) for the Bulk Electric Systems of North America. The ERCOT Transmission Planning Criteria is made available by ERCOT without conditions to FERC and the public for download from Internet Web Page: http://www.ercot.com/mktrules/guides/planning/current. Regional organization name, mailing address, contact person and title, telephone and facsimile numbers: Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. 7620 Metro Center Drive Austin, Texas 78744 Bill Magness Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary Phone: (512) 225-7076 Fax: (512) 225-7079 Common transmission reliability criteria for AEP Texas and ETT have been developed and are included in this report. AEP Texas and ETT comply with the ERCOT Reliability Criteria, the NERC Standards and the American Electric Power Transmission Reliability Criteria as the basis for the planning and design of the AEP Texas and ETT transmission systems. 4.1

American Electric Power Transmission Planning Reliability Criteria Purpose This report presents an overview of AEP s transmission planning criteria. The AEP criteria described herein supplements the: 1) North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) Reliability Standards; 2) ReliabilityFirst Corporation (RFC) Standards, 3) PJM Planning and Operating Manuals: Manual 14B, 4) SPP Criteria with Appendices Section 3, Regional Transmission Planning, and 5) ERCOT Planning Guide Section 4, Transmission Planning Criteria where applicable. Nominal Voltage Levels Nominal 765 kv, 345 kv, 161 kv, and 138 kv voltage levels will normally be used for most new power transmission lines and are considered Bulk Electric System (BES). Some interconnection lines may be at 500 kv, 230 kv, or 115 kv to match neighboring utilities voltage, and some 69 kv lines may be constructed in appropriate situations. The AEP transmission facilities for the PJM region are divided into the following three performance categories: EHV Facilities: Transmission lines rated 765 kv, 500 kv, and 345 kv, and transformers with secondary voltages at or above 345 kv, are considered Extra High Voltage (EHV) facilities, and are referred to as EHV facilities in this document. These facilities are part of the BES. HV Facilities: Transmission lines rated 230 kv, 161 kv, and 138 kv, and transformers with secondary voltages above 100 kv but below 345 kv, are considered High Voltage (HV) facilities, and are referred to as HV facilities in this document. These facilities are part of the BES. Sub-T Facilities: Transmission lines rated below 100 kv, and transformers with secondary voltages below 100 kv are considered sub-transmission (Sub-T) facilities, and are referred to as Sub-T facilities in this document. These facilities are not part of the BES. Voltage Limits Transmission level buses above 60 kv shall meet the following steady state voltage response and post-contingency voltage deviation criteria: 4.2

0.95 per unit to 1.05 per unit in the pre-contingency state following the occurrence of any operating condition in category P0 of the NERC Reliability Facilities associated with series line compensating capacitors are permitted to operate above 1.05 per unit. 0.92 per unit to 1.05 per unit in the post-contingency state following the occurrence of any operating condition in categories P1 through P7 of the NERC Reliability Standard TPL-001-4 addressing Transmission System Planning Performance Facilities associated with series line compensating capacitors are permitted to operate above 1.05 per unit. Following the occurrence of any operating condition in categories P1 through P7 of the NERC Reliability Standard TPL-001-4, further analysis to assess voltage stability is required in the event of a post-contingency steady-state voltage deviation that exceeds 8% at any load-serving bus above 100 kv, exclusive of buses on a radial system that serve only Resource Entities and/or Load. Transmission level buses shall meet the following steady state voltage response and postcontingency voltage deviation criteria: 0.95 per unit to 1.05 per unit in the pre-contingency state following the occurrence of any operating condition in category P0 of the NERC Reliability Certain 500 kv facilities are permitted to operate above 1.05 per unit to match neighboring utilities operating criteria. 0.92 per unit to 1.05 per unit in the post-contingency state following the occurrence of any operating condition in categories P1 through P7 of the NERC Reliability Standard TPL-001-4 addressing Transmission System Planning Performance Certain 500 kv facilities are permitted to operate above 1.05 per unit to match neighboring utilities operating criteria. Following the occurrence of any operating condition in categories P1 through P7 of the NERC Reliability Standard TPL-001-4, a voltage deviation from system normal of 8% or greater is not acceptable at any station. Transmission voltages during emergencies should not result in customer voltages exceeding or falling below prescribed limits at distribution substations on the transmission system and voltages at generating stations below minimum acceptable levels established for each station must be avoided to prevent tripping of the generating units. Static and dynamic reactive devices and LTC auto-transformers are used in transmission substations to hold voltage levels within acceptable ranges during normal and emergency conditions. The voltage limits of these reactive devices can exceed prescribed limits if distribution regulating equipment maintains customer voltage within acceptable limits. Voltage fluctuations (flicker) are addressed in the AEP Interconnection Guidelines. 4.3

Thermal Limits Thermal ratings define transmission facility loading limits. Normal ratings are generally based upon no abnormal loss of facility life or equipment damage. Emergency ratings accept some loss of life or strength, over a defined time limit for operation at the rated loading level. The thermal rating for a transmission line is defined by the most limiting element, be it a conductor capability, sag clearance, or terminal equipment rating. Thermal limits establish the maximum amount of electrical current that a transmission circuit or electrical facility can conduct over a specified time period before it sustains permanent damage by overheating or before it violates public safety requirements. Normal and emergency transmission equipment ratings are documented by AEP standards and guidelines. Transmission level buses above 60 kv shall meet the following performance criteria: No facility may exceed its normal rating in the pre-contingency state following the occurrence of any operating condition in category P0 of the NERC Reliability No facility may exceed its emergency rating in the post-contingency state following the occurrence of any operating condition in categories P1 through P7 of the NERC Reliability Standard TPL-001-4 addressing Transmission System Planning Performance Transmission level buses shall meet the following performance criteria: No facility may exceed its normal rating in the pre-contingency state following the occurrence of any operating condition in category P0 of the NERC Reliability No EHV facility may exceed its normal rating and no HV, or Sub-T facility may exceed its emergency rating in the post-contingency state following the occurrence of any operating condition in category P1 of the NERC Reliability No facility may exceed its emergency rating in the post-contingency state following the occurrence of any operating condition in categories P2 through P7 of the NERC Reliability Standard TPL-001-4 addressing Transmission System Planning Performance 4.4

Steady State Testing Criteria For the ERCOT Region: Steady State testing of the AEP transmission system is in accordance with NERC Reliability Standard TPL-001-4 and the ERCOT Planning Guide Section 4. For the PJM and SPP Regions: Steady State testing of the AEP transmission system is in accordance with NERC Reliability Standard TPL-001-4. Short Circuit Testing Criteria AEP steady state planning criteria requires that no bus voltage on AEP system shall exceed 1.05 per unit under system normal or contingency conditions. This voltage limit takes into consideration the equipment capabilities on AEP system. Short circuit assessment is performed assuming 1.05 per unit voltage at all the AEP system buses. AEP steady state planning criteria requires that no bus voltage on AEP system shall exceed 1.05 per unit under system normal or contingency conditions. This voltage limit takes into consideration the equipment capabilities on AEP system. Short circuit assessment is performed assuming 1.05 per unit voltage at all the AEP system buses. This is a conservative approach but accounts for a wide range of system conditions. Circuit breakers at or near a generator plant shall be analyzed differently based on the scheduled voltage at the generator bus. This exception only applies to generator plants already in operation with established scheduled voltages. Stability Testing and Performance Criteria Stability testing of the AEP transmission system is in accordance with NERC TPL-001-4In addition, testing of the AEP system in the ERCOT Region is in accordance with the ERCOT Planning Guide Section 4. TPL-001-4 R4.1.3 acceptable damping and R5 transient voltage response criteria may be found in PJM Manual 14B Section G.2.2, ERCOT Planning Guide Sections 4.1.1.5 and 4.1.1.6, and the SPP Disturbance Performance Requirements document for the PJM, ERCOT, and SPP areas, respectively. An exception to TPL-001-4 stability testing criteria is that P7 category Planning Events are simulated with three-phase faults instead of phase-to-ground faults because threephase is more conservative for common tower structure outages. 4.5