UN-Regulation No. 80 Comparative study between static and dynamic test procedure

Similar documents
Proposal for amendments to UN R16: Mandatory fitting of safety-belt reminder

(62 nd GRSP, December 201 agenda item 26(g)) Regulation No. 80. ms comparison of static und mic test procedure.

Introduction of Booster Cushions in R129

Research on Chest Injury Criteria

Proposal for the 02 series of amendments to Phase 2 of Regulation No. 129 (Enhanced Child Restraint Systems)

Flex-GTR: Comparison of Test Results from Prototype and Series Production Legforms. - BASt / ACEA joint project, November

Insert the title of your presentation here. Presented by Name Here Job Title - Date

Proposal. Submitted. agenda item 17) supersedes made 2017/04/19) Insert new. of the. The minimum size area." Insert new. inform the.

Side impact protection in non-integral CRS First feedback on 440 mm. 52 nd Meeting of the UN Informal Group on Child Restraint Systems

Proposal for 10 series of amendments to Regulation No. 17 (Strength of seat)

Informal Document N 20 (30th GRSP, 3-6 December 2001, agenda item 1.4) Insert in the "CONTENTS" the headlines of new annexes 10 & 11 to read:

UN Regulation (UNR) for Hydrogen Fuelled Vehicles of Categories L1, L2, L3, L4 and L5

Economic and Social Council

TRL s Child Seat Rating, (TCSR) Front Impact Testing Specification

REGULATION No. 94 (Frontal collision) Proposal for draft amendments. Proposal submitted by France

Presentation of the draft Global Technical Regulation on Safety Belts

Comparison of vehicle categories under Japanese regulations with ECE

ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2014/10

Economic and Social Council

ADR Compliance Crash Testing Explained

Integrated. Safety Handbook. Automotive. Ulrich Seiffert and Mark Gonter. Warrendale, Pennsylvania, USA INTERNATIONAL.

ECE Regulation N th session of GRSP May Informal document GRSP Rev.1 (55 th GRSP, May 2013, agenda item 18)

ECE Regulation N th session of GRSP December 2013

ECE Regulation N th session of GRSP December Informal document GRSP (54 th GRSP, December 2013, agenda item 19)

Proposal for the 09 series of amendments to Regulation No. 17

Informal document GRSP (50th GRSP, 6 9 December 2011, agenda item 14) RESULTS. Phase II. Latin NCAP GRSP December, 2011 Geneva

E/ECE/324/Rev.2/Add.128/Rev.2/Amend.2 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.2/Add.128/Rev.2/Amend.2

CLIENT PROJECT REPORT

Lateral Protection Device

Side Impact and Ease of Use Comparison between ISOFIX and LATCH. CLEPA Presentation to GRSP, Informal Document GRSP Geneva, May 2004

GIDAS accident analysis pole side impact with CV s TP/EVA

E/ECE/324/Rev.1/Add.43/Rev.3/Amend.7 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.1/Add.43/Rev.3/Amend.7

WLTC Validation phase 1 Main results by IFA

STUDY ON CAR-TO-CAR FRONTAL OFFSET IMPACT WITH VEHICLE COMPATIBILITY

EEVC Report to EC DG Enterprise Regarding the Revision of the Frontal and Side Impact Directives January 2000

Transport Canada. Child Occupant Protection Research. Considerations for Future Regulations. Suzanne Tylko Chief of Crashworthiness Research

Economic and Social Council

Legal Aspects of Active Safety Systems. Tom Gasser, Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen (BASt) interactive Final Event

Proposal for the 02 series of amendments to Phase 2 of Regulation No. 129 (Enhanced Child Restraint Systems)

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 49 CFR Part 571. [Docket No. NHTSA ]

Proposal for amendments to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2019/9

December 2015 Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism

Status of Research Work of EEVC WG 15 Compatibility Between Cars

GLOBAL REGISTRY. Addendum. Global technical regulation No. 7. HEAD RESTRAINTS (Established in the Global Registry on 13 March 2008) Appendix

Tel. :

Australian Pole Side Impact Research 2010

Electric Vehicles Safety Global Technical Regulation

Safety Briefing on Roof Crush How a Strong Federal Roof Crush Standard Can Save Many Lives & Why the Test Must Include Both Sides of the Roof

(Acts whose publication is not obligatory) COUNCIL COUNCIL DIRECTIVE

Volume 14 No. 6 June 2000 mga research corporation

Economic and Social Council

Deflection of Deployable Bonnets in DB Systems

FMVSS No. 226 Ejection Mitigation Final Rule. Presented by Susan Meyerson 2 nd Meeting of the Pole Side Impact GTR Brussels, Belgium March 3-4, 2011

Method Development for Evaluating Wheelchair Seating System (WCSS) Crashworthiness using FMVSS-207 Testing

SLED TEST PROCEDURE FOR ASSESSING KNEE IMPACT AREAS

Certificate of testing

Economic and Social Council

Proposal for UN Regulation on AEBS for M1/N1

Certification of Aircraft Seating Design Changes

The Future of Crash Testing: The new Mercedes-Benz Technology Center for Vehicle Safety Prof. Norbert Schaub

E/ECE/324/Rev.2/Add.128/Rev.1/Amend.2 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.2/Add.128/Rev.1/Amend.2

Simulation and Validation of FMVSS 207/210 Using LS-DYNA

Economic and Social Council

WHEELCHAIR TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS W/c Tiedown and Occupant Restraint Systems-WTORS

Contact person Date Reference Page Mikael Videby P08110A 1 (6) SP Structural and Solid Mechanics

The following pages contain the proposals that were made by the participants of the ECE- R21 ad-hoc working group during:

SPCT Method. The SPCT Method - Testing of Dog Crates. Utskrivet dokument är ostyrt, dvs inte säkert gällande.

Survey on Safety of New Mobility Vehicles

Pre impact Braking Influence on the Standard Seat belted and Motorized Seat belted Occupants in Frontal Collisions based on Anthropometric Test Dummy

Potential Use of Crash Test Data for Crashworthiness Research

Finalization of Annex 4 of UN Regulation No.0

China International Automotive Congress Traffic & Safety Possible Transfer of European Achievements

WorldSID 50 th Update

Test Report No.: SHHG MD Date: FEB. 26, 2016 Page: 1 of 17

NISSAN MICRA DECEMBER ONWARDS NEW ZEALAND VARIANTS WITH 0.9 LITRE ENGINE

Alfonso PORCEL, Olivier MACCHI - PSA Peugeot Citroen, France

Collective amendments to UN Regulations Nos. 16, 44, 94, 129 and 137

UN/ECE/WP29/GRSP INFORMAL GROUP DOOR LOCK & DOOR RETENTION COMPONENTS

Van Guard. Bulkhead Test Report

E/ECE/324/Rev.1/Add.79/Rev.1 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.1/Add.79/Rev.1

Proposal of Automated Driving from Ad-hoc group on LKAS/RCP

I. Road Safety Targets and Indicators. II. Follow-up. III. Proposal. Note by the secretariat

Test Report No.: AJHL FT Date: JUN.02, 2016 Page 1 of 5

White Paper. Compartmentalization and the Motorcoach

Economic and Social Council

EUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (Euro NCAP) ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL CHILD OCCUPANT PROTECTION

the OR DEFECTIVE (Presented by SUMMARY At the 1.1 forty-second adopted a new Special Provision 1.2 the Transport of authorized beneficial to Technical

Occupant Protection ! WARNING: SEAT BELTS SEAT BELT FITTING

NovitaTech Engineering

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD IN CAR COMPATIBILITY PHENOMENA

PROJECT DELIVERABLE. frontal impact and compatibility assessment research

Evaluation of Advance Compatibility Frontal Structures Using the Progressive Deformable Barrier

Test Report No.: SDHL FT Date: May 15, 2017 Page 1 of 15

EUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (Euro NCAP) ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL CHILD OCCUPANT PROTECTION

Airbags SAFETY INFORMATION. Your vehicle is equipped with several types of airbags: front airbags, side airbags, and side curtain airbags.

Remote Control Parking (RCP)

Behavior of a turbocharged gas engine during a low voltage ride through

Airbags SAFETY INFORMATION

OVERVIEW ANS OPERATING PROCESS REMOVAL AND INSTALLATION COMPONENT

EUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (Euro NCAP) ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL CHILD OCCUPANT PROTECTION

Transcription:

Submitted by the expert from Germany Informal document GRSP-62-35 (62 nd GRSP, 12-15 December 2017 agenda item 26(g)) UN-Regulation No. 80 Comparative study between static and dynamic test procedure Julian Ott November 2017 Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen

UN Regulation No. 80 Goal of UN Regulation No. 80: the occupant is correctly retained by the seat in front of him (and/or by the use of a safety belt dynamic only). the seat and the seat anchorages are strong enough. after an impact the occupant is not seriously injured Slide 2

UN-Regulation No. 80 Are these tests equivalent? Slide 3

UN-Regulation No. 80 The current UN-Regulation No. 80 allows to approve large passanger vehicle seats and their anchorage according to two different test procedures. Appendix 1 (dynamic) sled test with 50%ile Dummy (HII or HIII), 30-32km/h, 8-12g Test 1 (without belt) Test 2 (with belt) or Appendix 5 (static) defined forces applied to the backrest at two locations a x F 1 F 2 a x Slide 4

Testmatrix Tests have been conducted according to test procedure R80 Appendix 1 (dynamic) and Appendix 5 (static) different seats at different labs. All seats are equipped with quick clamping systems Seat Test procedure Belt Test-No. Remarks unbelted R-80_17_01 A Dynamic (Appendix 1) Static (Appendix 5) unbelted R80-1-1-01 2-point belt R80-1-2-02 Seat only R-80_17_02 not part of R80 Seat only R80-1-1-05 not part of R80 - R-80-d-17_01-179421190_002 B Dynamic (Appendix 1) unbelted unbelted R80-1-1-03 R80-1-1-04 Static (Appendix 5) - 179421190_001 C Dynamic (Appendix 1) unbelted R-80_17_03 Static (Appendix 5) - R-80-d-17_02 Slide 5

Results Dynamic Test 1 R80-1-1-01 - Seat A o o Tested according to R80 Appendix 1, Test 1 (unbelted) Observations: Auxiliary seat slides 600mm (but still in seat track) Test seat slides without any load of the dummies completely out of the seat track seat mountings are not strong enough to hold the seat in place Occupants are not restrained by the test seat Dummy values are below the s but serious injuries are likely Pre-test Post-test Sliding distance of auxiliary seat Slide 6

Results Dynamic Test 2 R80-1-2-02 - Seat A o o Tested according to R80 Appendix 1, Test 2 (belted) Observations: Auxiliary seat detaches completely from the seat track Test seat slides without any load of the dummies completely out of the seat track seat mountings are not strong enough to hold the seat in place Occupants are not restrained by the test seat Dummy values are below the s but serious injuries are likely Pre-test Post-test -Dummies Post-test - overview Slide 7

Results Static Test 179421190_002 Seat A o Tested according to R80 Appendix 5 o Observations: Seat stays in place, no failure The maximum displacement at F 1 is below the of 400mm The minimum displacement at F 1 / F 2 is above the of 100/50mm Slide 8

Conclusion The statically (appendix 5) tested seats, when tested according to the dynamic test, collapsed in the dynamic tests Goal of UN Regulation No. 80 is not achieved when tested statically 5 Proposal: delete static test according to Appendix Slide 9

Outlook In addition it has been observed that the static test procedure: does not consider dynamic effects like: oscillation inertia mass and mass distribution of the seat detaching of accessories detaching/sliding/failure of clamp connection and locking does only partially take into account the different installation situation of the seat (lateral and vertical offset of seats, etc.). the dynamic test procedure: Does not limit the sliding of the seat anchorage Slide 10

Thank you for your attention! Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen

Seat Results - Summary Test procedure Dynamic (Appendix 1) Belt Test-No. Resistance of seat/seat mountings unbelted R-80_17_01 test seat slides ~240mm and detaches partly; auxiliary seat slides ~100mm *) unbelted R80-1-1-01 test seat slides out of seat track; auxiliary seat slides ~600mm Occupants restraint excursion below not restrained Occupant load values above values below A Other 2-point belt R80-1-2-02 test seat slides out of seat track; auxiliary seat detaches not restrained values below Seat only R-80_17_02 seat slides ~655mm - - Seat only R80-1-1-05 seat slides ~665mm - - Static (Appendix 5) - R-80-d-17_01 seat slides ~20mm correctly restrained - 179421190_002 seat does not move correctly restrained sufficient deformation sufficient deformation B Dynamic (Appendix 1) unbelted R80-1-1-03 test seat slides ~39mm Dummy excursion below unbelted R80-1-1-04 test seat slides ~16mm excursion below values below values below Static (Appendix 5) - 179421190_001 Seat does not move correctly restrained sufficient deformation C Dynamic (Appendix 1) Static (Appendix 5) unbelted R-80_17_03 test seat slides (~340mm) excursion below - R-80-d-17_02 seat does not move correctly restrained values below sufficient deformation *) seat sliding influenced due to tape on seat track Slide 12