Reliability-Based Bridge Load Posting

Similar documents
Probability based Load Rating

RELIABILITY-BASED EVALUATION OF BRIDGE LIVE LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY IN THE UNITED STATES. Lubin Gao 1

Load Rating for SHVs and EVs

Workshop Agenda. I. Introductions II. III. IV. Load Rating Basics General Equations Load Rating Procedure V. Incorporating Member Distress VI.

CHAPTER 7 VEHICLES... 2

Load Rating in Michigan

Ohio Transportation Engineering Conference 2012

MDOT Load Rating Program

FHWA Update AASHTO SCOBS Annual Meeting

Case Study of Bridge Load Rating in KY using BrR. C.Y. Yong, P.E., S.E., ENV-SP

Michigan Division Federal Highway Administration Update

HS20-44 vs HL-93 (Standard Specifications vs LRFD Code)

US 191 Load Rating Past and Present. By Ron Pierce, P.E.,S.E., CBI David Evans & Associates Bridge Operations Services Practice Leader

Item #2 - Load Rating/Posting Policy Sean Hankins is currently working on Load Rating Policy with Jeremy.

Impact of Heavy Loads on State and Parish Bridges. Aziz Saber, Ph.D., P.E. Program Chair Civil Engineering Louisiana Tech University

MASH 2016 Implementation: What, When and Why

LA Design and Rating Vehicle based on WIM (Weigh-in-Motion) Study

AASHTOWare Bridge Rating Vehicle Library Setup

Review of Load Rating and Posting Procedures and Requirements. Mark D. Bowman. Raymond Chou

2018 NDACE CONFERENCE

Development of Crash Modification Factors for Rumble Strips Treatment for Freeway Applications: Phase I Development of Safety Performance Functions

VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM

STRUCTURE AND BRIDGE DIVISION

POST-WELD TREATMENT OF A WELDED BRIDGE GIRDER BY ULTRASONIC IMPACT TREATMENT

Maine and Vermont Interstate Highway Heavy Truck Pilot Program. 6 Month Report

TRAFFIC REGULATION APPROVAL PROCESS

The INDOT Friction Testing Program: Calibration, Testing, Data Management, and Application

Rural Two-Lane Roadways in Louisiana

Operations Management - II Post Graduate Program Session 13. Vinay Kumar Kalakbandi Assistant Professor Operations & Systems Area

AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES AND THE TRUCKING INDUSTRY

A Gap-Based Approach to the Left Turn Signal Warrant. Jeremy R. Chapman, PhD, PE, PTOE Senior Traffic Engineer American Structurepoint, Inc.

Welcome Performance and Registration Information Systems Management (PRISM)

Crash Testing Growth Common Roadside Hardware Systems Draft FHWA and AASHTO Requirements for Implementing MASH 2015

Probabilistic Modeling of Fatigue Damage in Steel Box-Girder Bridges Subject to Stochastic Vehicle Loads

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

DOT HS October 2011

2018 LOUISIANA TRANSPORTATION CONFERENCE. Mohsen Shahawy, PHD, PE

A R T I C L E S E R I E S

STRUCTURAL BUILDING COMPONENTS MAGAZINE December 2004

Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act

Jan Spoormaker Spoormaker Consultancy www. Spoormaker-Consultancy.com

Motorized Alternative Modes of Transportation

Performance Tests of Asphalt Mixtures

Memorandum Federal Highway Administration

Opportunities and Challenges for the. Friday September 24,

FHWA Bridge Program Initiatives - Bridge Design and Analysis

Flexible Ramping Product Technical Workshop

NTSB Recommendations to Reduce Speeding-Related Crashes

Determining Motorists Response to Signage in Rural Highway Work Zones

Vehicles Emissions In-Service Conformity. February 2017

Department of Transportation. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. [Docket No. NHTSA ; Notice 2]

The application of the 95% Confidence interval with ISAT and IMAGE

Introduction. Julie C. DeFalco Policy Analyst 125.

Traffic Signal Volume Warrants A Delay Perspective

SAN JACINTO COLLEGE COMMERCIAL TRUCK DRIVING CLASS SCHEDULE

Highway Crossings - Cased or Uncased

INNOVATIONS IN TRAVEL TIME RELIABILITY MONITORING EMPOWERMENT FROM EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES

Evaluation of the Rolling Wheel Deflectometer (RWD) in Louisiana. John Ashley Horne Dr. Mostafa A Elseifi

How to Prepare for a DOT Audit

Conventional Approach

Agenda. Puerto Rico s Highway System. An Overview of Puerto Rico

Engineering Report: Shasta-Trinity National Forest. South Fork Management Unit. Analysis of. National Forest System Road 30N44

COMMERCIAL DRIVER LICENSE MANUAL FLORIDADMVBOOKLET COM

What to Expect in a DOT Drug & Alcohol Audit

SPCC Marina Inspection Update Oklahoma Marina Association Inspector Tom McKay

U.S. Highway Attributes Relevant to Lane Tracking Raina Shah Christopher Nowakowski Paul Green

Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety Requirements

FMCSA Medical Fraud Process. Eric Adair FMCSA

Recordkeeping Requirements of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations

A REPORT ON THE STATISTICAL CHARACTERISTICS of the Highlands Ability Battery CD

CDL TESTING AND REGULATIONS

Quantifying Annual Bridge Cost by Overweight Trucks in South Carolina

NHTSA s Final Rule on Seat Belts: Where Do We Stand?

November 16, 1998 Refer to: HNG-14. Mr. David Allardyce Mechanical Engineer B&B Electromatic Main Street Norwood, Louisiana 70761

EMERGENCY ACCESS POLICY

A R T I C L E S E R I E S

Implementation of AASHTO s Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) 2016

Emergency Signal Warrant Evaluation: A Case Study in Anchorage, Alaska

Hazardous Waste Transportation Variances

THE MOVES TRANSITION MADE EASY THE TDOT WAY. Introduction TDOT s Proposal Work Completed In Progress What s HOT Questions?

Automated and Connected Vehicles: Planning for Uncertainty

P.L Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act

Applicability for Green ITS of Heavy Vehicles by using automatic route selection system

In this Think Safety, we will

9/17/2013 OVERVIEW WHAT RICE UNITS ARE IMPACTED? WHAT IS A RICE UNIT? EXAMPLES OF RICE UNITS WHY IS THE EPA REGULATING RICE?

2. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

Impact of doubling heavy vehicles on bridges

BMW of North America, LLC, Grant of Petition for Decision of. AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),

Special Applications PB 1

RICE NESHAP Implementation. Ray Lukkarinen, P.E. Stanley Consultants, Inc.

OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CENTRAL OFFICE, 1980 W. BROAD ST., COLUMBUS, OHIO

Harlem Avenue between 63 rd and 65 th

TITLE 16. TRANSPORTATION CHAPTER 27. TRAFFIC REGULATIONS AND TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES

Designing for Reliability and Robustness with MATLAB

Draft Project Deliverables: Policy Implications and Technical Basis

Research Update Construction Conference Charles Holzschuher, P.E. February 3, Florida Department of Transportation

mileage fees primer vmt fees are in your future

DRIVER SPEED COMPLIANCE WITHIN SCHOOL ZONES AND EFFECTS OF 40 PAINTED SPEED LIMIT ON DRIVER SPEED BEHAVIOURS Tony Radalj Main Roads Western Australia

Maintaining Pavement Marking Retroreflectivity

AAA ON THE ISSUES

Transcription:

Reliability-Based Bridge Load Posting The LRFR Approach 2013 Louisiana Transportation conference February 17-20, 2013 Lubin Gao, Ph.D., P.E. Senior Bridge Engineer Load Rating Office of Bridge Technology Federal Highway Administration

Bridge Failure It could happen anytime and anywhere, if we don t do things right. It could happen, even if we do things right.

NBIS 23 CFR 650 Subpart C 650.313 Inspection Procedures (c) Rate each bridge as to its safe load carrying capacity in accordance with the AASHTO Manual. Post or restrict the bridge in accordance with the AASHTO Manual. To ensure safety, bridges must be inspected, load rated, and posted if necessary.

AASHTO Manual for Bridge Evaluation First Edition, 2008 Second Edition, 2011 Section 6: Load Rating Part A Load and Resistance Factor Rating Article 6A.8 Posting of Bridges Part B Allowable Stress and Load Factor Rating Article 6B.7 - Posting of Bridges (2 nd Edition MBE) Article 6B.9 - Posting of Bridges (1 st Edition MBE) Section 7: Fatigue Evaluation of Steel Bridges Section 8: Nondestructive Load Testing

Findings of OIG s Audit: March, 2006 State Inspections Were Adequate, but Load Ratings and Maximum Weight Postings Were Not Accurate Errors found in the calculation of load ratings or in the posting of maximum weight limits or other related errors for 33 of the 43 bridges reviewed in a sample from the three states.

In-depth Load Rating and Posting Review: 2007-2010 Findings and Risks No. 4 Not all bridges which require posting are posted in accordance with the NBIS. Not all bridges are load posted in accordance with the NBIS. Inaccurate or incomplete load ratings and postings could result in damaging loads on bridges. Other impacts could include commerce and improper allocation of available resources.

Finding No. 4

Concrete Bridges Steel Bridges

Data by 10/05/2011 FHWA LRFR Implementation Webinar Series Webinar No. 1, October 5, 2011

Posting Signage

MUTCD MBE Articles 6A.8.2: When the maximum legal load under State law exceeds the safe load capacity of a bridge, restrictive load posting shall be required. Though there is variation among the States with respect to the type of signs preferred for posting bridges, most states use either a single weight-limit sign or a three-vehicle combination sign. In any case, the posting signs shall conform to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD).

North Carolina Illinois

Alabama Georgia

Posting Methodology

Allowable Stress Rating:

Load Factor Rating:

Posting Load (xw) Public safety is our first responsibility. Load Factor Rating: Posting Load: W RF 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 Inventory Rating Operating Rating RF op = RF inv = C 1.3DL 1.3 LL + I C 1.3DL 2.17 LL + I RF = Legal load rating factor W = Weight of rating vehicle 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Rating Factor, RF LFR LOAD POSTING CURVE

Posting Load (xw) Public safety is our first responsibility. LRFR Posting Load: 1.0 0.8 W 0.7 RF 0.3 0.6 0.4 0.2 RF = Legal load rating factor W = Weight of rating vehicle 0.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 Rating Factor, RF LRFR LOAD POSTING CURVE

Structural Reliability The limit state function is defined as g = R D where D and R are the load effect and resistance, respectively. Both D and R are statistically distributed with the uncertainty of their values at the time that the component is designed or evaluated. The probability of failure can be written as P f = P[g < 0] = P[R < D]

Structural Reliability The reliability index, b, to measure the safety margin, β = g σ g where g and σ g represent the mean and standard deviation of the random number, g. β = R D σ R 2 + σ D 2 β = (1) Normal Distribution (2) Log-Normal Distribution (3) Monte-Carlo Simulation ln R D V R 2 + V D 2

Structural Reliability

Structural Reliability

LRFR The reliability level inherent in the posting curve is raised at the lower posting loads to achieve reliability targets closer to design Inventory levels rather than the evaluation or operating reliability characteristic of other practices in this Manual.

Probabilistic Load and Resistance Models: Normal Distribution Public safety is our first responsibility. LRFR

Probabilistic Load and Resistance Models: Normal Distribution Public safety is our first responsibility. LRFR

FHWA s Expectations

FHWA s Expectations NBIS Compliance: Each bridge must have a valid load rating. Re-evaluate and rate as loadings or conditions change. Re-rate bridges anytime as deemed needed. Post or restrict a bridge in accordance with MBE or State law.

Thank you for your attention! Lubin Gao, Ph.D., P.E. Senior Bridge Engineer Load Rating