Metro Green Line to LAX Alternatives Analysis. March 2012

Similar documents
Measure R Funded Transit Projects

3. PRELIMINARY DEFINITION OF ALTERNATIVES

Airport Metro Connector. Technical Refinement Study of Alternatives Final

Crenshaw-Prairie Transit Corridor Study Public Meetings

Crenshaw/LAX Transit Corridor. Transit Coalition Meeting June 26, 2012

Mobility Corridor Updates. Transit & Active Transportation Projects

Mobility Corridor Updates. Transit & Active Transportation Projects

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

LAX Specific Plan Amendment Study. CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT Public Meeting Series #5 August 23 & 26, 2006

engineering phase and during the procurement of design build contracts.

Sepulveda Pass Corridor Systems Planning Study Update

Los Angeles World Airports. LAX Landside Transportation Program

METRO Orange Line BRT American Boulevard Station Options

Pacific Electric Right-of-Way / West Santa Ana Branch Corridor Alternatives Analysis

Develop ground transportation improvements to make the Airport a multi-modal regional

6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

APPENDIX I: [FIXED-GUIDEWAY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY]

CMAA Southern California Chapter Dinner Los Angeles World Airports Capital Program

Sepulveda Pass Corridor Systems Planning Study

Green Line Extension to Torrance Supplemental Alternatives Analysis. 2. Purpose and Need 2. PURPOSE AND NEED

Los Angeles County One Gateway Plaza ~13.g Tel Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles, CA rnetro.net

Needs and Community Characteristics

Study Area, Related Projects and Travel Markets

Community Meetings Welcome

I-405 and SR 522/NE 145th Bus Rapid Transit. Elected Leadership Groups Meeting November 30, 2018

Community Meetings June 2018

Welcome and Agenda. Thank you for joining us! 6:00 pm Open House. 6:30 pm Welcome & Presentation. 7:00 pm Q&A. 7:15 pm Open House Resumes

Status of Plans March Presented by CAPITOL REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS

Restoration of Historic Streetcar Services in Downtown Los Angeles

Expo Light Rail Line Project Status Update Meeting Holman United Methodist Church January 27, 2011

Bi-County Transitway/ Bethesda Station Access Demand Analysis

Landside Access Modernization Program (LAMP)

6/11/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

CHAPTER SEVEN: EVALUATION METHODOLOGY FOR COST AND COST EFFECTIVENESS MEASURES Locally Preferred Alternative Report

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study

Community Meetings. January/February 2019

Project Scoping Report Appendix B Project Web Site. APPENDIX B Project Web Site

Mountain View Automated Guideway Transit Feasibility Study Community Meeting September 25, 2017

Restoration of Historic Streetcar Services in Downtown Los Angeles

Alternatives Analysis Findings Report

Project Scoping Open House Welcome

10/4/2016. October 6, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

CEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update

Regional Transit Extension Studies. Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization Passenger Rail Task Force Meeting December 17, 2013

FINAL. Sound Transit Long-Range Plan Update. Issue Paper S.1: Tacoma Link Integration with Central Link. Prepared for: Sound Transit

Valley Metro: Past, Present and Future. September 11, 2014

East San Fernando Valley Transit Corridor. TAC Briefing December 4, 2013

Project Budget and Schedule Status

CITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6

Service Quality: Higher Ridership: Very Affordable: Image:

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

WELCOME. Transit Options Amherst - Buffalo Public Workshops

Metro Transit Update. Christina Morrison, Senior Planner Metro Transit BRT/Small Starts Project Office. John Dillery, Senior Transit Planner

Public Meeting. City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development

Draft Results and Recommendations

Chapter 4 : THEME 2. Transportation

San Francisco to San Jose Preliminary Alternatives Analysis

THE WILSHIRE CORRIDOR: RAIL AND ITS ALTERNATIVES. Prepared By: Jacki Murdock Transportation and Environmental Planner

Orange Line Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Improvements San Fernando Valley Service Council April 3, 2019

Broward County Intermodal Center And People Mover. AASHTO Value Engineering Conference Presentation. September 1, 2009 San Diego, CA

Capital Needs Assessment Riders Advisory Council July2, 2008

12/10/2018. December 6, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Treasure Island Mobility Management Program

Community Open Houses November 29 December 7, 2017

Preliminary Definition of Alternatives. 3.0 Preliminary Definition of Alternatives

Transit Project Delivery Status Report. Significant Issues

VIRGINIA RAILWAY EXPRESS MANASSAS PARK STATION PARKING EXPANSION. Site Evaluation & Recommendation. October 18, 2016

Why coordinate the Van Nuys and Sepulveda Pass project studies together?

Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study

Valley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014

CTfastrak Expansion. Stakeholder Meeting #4 Manchester Town Hall June 3, 2016

JTA S MOBILITY CORRIDORS. Improving System Performance Through Urban Design

Mississauga Bus Rapid Transit Preliminary Design Project

Metro Harbor Subdivision Transit Corridor November 2009 Alternatives Analysis Report Final

GROWTH & DEVELOPMENT. Residents enjoying the newly opened Brickell City Centre on Nov. 3, 2016.

SEPULVEDA PASS CORRIDOR

Stakeholders Advisory Working Group Traffic and Transit Group Meeting #4, October 10, 2007

I-26 Fixed Guideway Alternatives Analysis

EGLINTON CROSSTOWN LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT (LRT)

Tempe Streetcar. March 2, 2016

HDR Engineering. HART North / South. Tampa Bay Applications Group Meeting May 14, 2009

Unified Corridor Investment Study DRAFT Step 2 Scenario Analysis Report

spas Specific Plan Amendment Study

Stakeholders Advisory Working Groups (SAWGs) Traffic and Transit SAWG Meeting #7

What is the Connector?

12/5/2018 DRAFT. December 6, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Husky Stadium: TMP Modernization Project

Federal Way Link Extension

Corridor Management Committee. March 7, 2012

Northeast Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Public Involvement Round 2 Input on Alternatives for Further Study

Transit Access Study

A Transit Plan for the Future. Draft Network Plan

Scarborough Transit Planning

Speaker Information Tweet about this presentation #TransitGIS

4.0 TIER 2 ALTERNATIVES

Transportation Committee Revised Project Scope and Cost Estimate. November 23, 2015

I-20 EAST TRANSIT INITIATIVE Tier 1 and Tier 2 Alternatives Screening Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Sepulveda Pass Corridor Systems Planning Study Final Compendium Report. Connecting the San Fernando Valley and the Westside

2/1/2018. February 1, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Transcription:

Metro Green Line to LAX Alternatives Analysis 1

2 The Crenshaw/LAX Project Foundation for Metro Green Line to LAX 8.5 mile extension Metro Exposition Line (Crenshaw Exposition) to Metro Green Line (Aviation/LAX Station) 6 new stations (+2 stations as construction bid options) New maintenance facility Builds first mile of Metro Green Line Extension to Aviation/Century Station B Forecasted opening: 2018 A A B

3 Metro Green Line to LAX Project Overview Goal: Connect the regional transit network to LAX Connection can take many forms Long Range Transportation Plan Metro funding: $200 M (Measure R) Opening year 2028 (could be as soon as 2018-2020 with funding from America Fast Forward, the airport and/or other sources) Additional non-metro funding will need to be secured Airport Future Metro Rail

4 Additional funding is required Measure R funded project: $200M ($2008) All rail alternatives (including light rail and automated people mover) require much more than this Project is contingent upon additional contributions from Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA) and/or other sources This planning process identifies feasible alternatives and develops preliminary cost estimates to determine funding needs Until funding is secured, no project can be adopted for construction Less expensive projects may have a higher likelihood of implementation Measure R $200M Additional Funding Required Total Cost of Alternative

5 Funding U.S. Airport Transit Systems Airport System Total Capital Cost ($M) (indexed to 2010$) Funding Contributions ($M) (indexed to 2010$) San Francisco (SFO) 39.3 million* $2,347 $770 Local $509 Airport $180 State $888 State BART AirTrain(APM) New York (JFK) 46.5 million* $2,338 $2,338 Airport AirTrain (APM) Miami (MIA) 35.7 million* $1,014 $557 Local $262 Airport $195 State Metro Rail MIA Mover (APM) Minneapolis (MSP) 32.0 million* Metro Transit $724 $85 Local $122 State $88 Airport $429 Federal *Annual Airport Passengers (2010) 59.1 million annual passengers passed through LAX in 2010

6 Types of Connections Direct Light Rail Transit (LRT) Branch Metro goes to the airport Metro Green Line direct connection Circulator Airport (Circulator) goes to Metro New transit system tailored to address the airport s unique travel demands/operating environment Intermediate LRT and Circulator Metro (LRT) and Airport (Circulator) meet in the middle Modified LRT Trunk Metro goes through the airport Direct connection for Metro Green & Crenshaw/LAX lines Parallels an alignment to be constructed as part of the Crenshaw/LAX line

7 Modes Light Rail Transit (LRT) Automated People Mover (APM) Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) (Elevated Busway)

8 Alignments Off-Airport On-Airport (in Terminal area)

9 Two-Stage Screening Process Initial Connection Concepts Direct LRT Branch Stage I Screening Screened Alternatives (27) Screening Alternatives Carried into EIS/EIR Additional Funding needs to be Identified Mode + Alignments Alternative Circulator Mode + Alignments Alternative Alternative Build Alternative Intermediate LRT & Circulator Mode + Alignments Alternative Build Alternative Alternative Modified LRT Trunk Mode + Alignments Alternative

We Screen Alternatives Using Common Evaluation Criteria 10 Stage I Emphasizes Feasibility > Mode Appropriate for Connection Type > Off-Airport Physical fit and constructability Avoid encroachment into Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) > On-Airport Walking distance from station to terminal Average total travel time (transit ride + walk) Construction cost Emphasizes Performance and Cost > Travel Time > Reliability > Convenience > Construction Cost (Metro only has $200M available, all rail alternatives cost much more than this) > Potential Environmental Impacts (e.g., visual, traffic) > Operating Characteristics > Constructability > Compatibility with airport and transportation system plans

11 Stage I Screening

Off-Airport Options Direct LRT Branch 12 Station and Route Options* 98 th North Century Blvd Pedestrian Bridge * Exact route and station location dependent on future LAX plans in area

Off-Airport Options Circulator 13 98 th St Century Blvd

Off-Airport Options Intermediate LRT & Circulator 14 Station and Route Options* 98 th North 1994 SEIR Pedestrian Bridge * Exact route and station location dependent on future LAX plans in area

Off-Airport Options Modified LRT Trunk 15 Through LAX Airport Blvd with Circulator Airport Blvd Through LAX Connection to Existing Metro Green Line Aerial Structure near Douglas St

On-Airport Options* Rail & BRT Alignments and Station Options 16 Aerial Or Tunnel Aerial Atgrade TBIT Tom Bradley International Terminal Rail Alignment Bus Alignment Potential Station * Apply to Direct LRT Branch, Circulator and Intermediate Connection Types

On-Airport Options Balancing Cost and Travel Time 17 With More Stations Capital Costs increase Walk distance and walk time decrease Total travel times (transit ride + walk) decrease from 1 to 3 stations but then increase with 4 or more stations Cost Travel Time 3x 2.5x 2x 1.5x 1x 0.5x 0x 12 10 8 6 4 2 Capital Cost 1 2 3 4 5 8 Number of Stations Aerial Alignment (Rail) Average Travel Time (Min) 0 1 2 3 4 5 Number of Stations 8

On-Airport Options 4 Alignments Carried Forward All rail options require additional funding 18 Lowest Rail Cost Aerial (Rail) Best Average Travel Time Tunnel (Rail) Balances Cost and Travel Time Aerial (Rail) Lowest Cost and Walk Time At-Grade (BRT)

Stage I Screening Results 19 Direct LRT Branch 6 Alternatives Circulator 8 Alternatives Intermediate LRT & Circulator 8 Alternatives Modified LRT Trunk 5 Alternatives 27 Alternatives Carried into Screening

20 Intentionally Left Blank

21 Screening

22 Trade-offs Passenger Convenience **Depending on future airport plans, alternatives have 5,000-10,000 additional riders who drive to the LAX area and ride to terminals. Alternative Connection Types Number of Transfers Vertical Level Changes Average Travel Time Saved (min) Airport Transit Riders per Day** Capital Cost ($M) ($200M is available) Direct LRT Branch 0-1 2-4 11 5,300-5,400 4,900-5,400 $540 - $1,160 Circulator (APM/BRT) 1 1-4 9 4,700-4,900 4,600-5,100 $624-$1,250 (APM) $120-140 (BRT) Intermediate LRT & Circulator 1-2 4-6 7 3,600-4,300 $680-$1,370 (APM) Modified LRT Trunk 0-1 2-4 16 Average travel time saved/added dependent on station location 4,700-6,100 $940-$1,460

Trade-offs Passenger Convenience (Cont.) 23 > Ridership and travel time savings go up as the number of transfers for airport transit riders goes down > Direct LRT Branch and Modified LRT Trunk have fewest transfers, most travel time savings and highest ridership for airport passengers > Circulator (APM/BRT) ridership is slightly lower, since all Metro Rail passengers transfer > Intermediate LRT and Circulator Alternative has the most transfers and level changes, and the lowest ridership > All Alternatives, except the BRT Circulator, require funding in excess of the $200M available from Metro Note: In addition to pure airport transit riders shown, there will likely be 5,000-10,000 additional riders who drive to the LAX area and then use the project alternatives to access the airport terminals.

Trade-offs Direct LRT Branch vs. Through LAX 24 Alternative Average Travel Time* (minutes) Ridership (Transit Riders per Day) Capital Cost ($M) ($200M is available) Constructability Issues Direct LRT Branch T T T T T T T T 29-30 5,300-5,400 $540-$1,160 *Average from Norwalk, Expo, and South Bay **Add 5,000 to 10,000 for airport area park and ride passengers Through LAX T T T T T T T T 25 6,100 $940-$1,130 *Average from Norwalk, Expo, and South Bay **Add 5,000 to 10,000 for airport area park and ride passengers

Trade-offs related to the Type of LRT Connection (Branch v. Trunk) 25 > Because Modified LRT Trunk Alternative (Through LAX) has shorter travel time, ridership is higher than Direct LRT Branch for airport passengers > The Through LAX Alternative requires some additional travel time for nonairport bound passengers traveling between Expo (Crenshaw Corridor) and South Bay (Redondo Beach) > For the Through LAX Alternative, the single station in the terminal area requires a long walk (0.3 to 0.4 miles) to reach western terminals (T3, T4, TBIT), or potential transfer to a circulator (e.g., bus, moving walkway, shuttle) to shorten walk > Constructability issues for Through LAX Alternative: Parallels portion of Crenshaw/LAX Line that is scheduled to begin construction in 2013 Requires a complex connection to existing Metro Green Line in El Segundo that would have operational impacts during construction

Trade-offs Alignments in the Airport Terminal Area 26 On-Airport Options Capital Cost ($M) ($200M is available) Average Total Travel Time to Terminal (min) Average Walk Dist. to Terminal (feet) Potential Visual Impacts to Theme Building $620-$740 32.2 820 Aerial (Rail) Tunnel (Rail) $1,040-$1,250 31.5 820 $1,060-$1,270 31.2 600 Aerial (Rail) At-Grade (BRT) $110-$130 34.3 Add 5-10 minutes under severe traffic congestion 200

Trade-offs Among Alignments within the Airport Terminal Area 27 > For LRT and APM, the 2 station aerial option Costs approximately $450 million less than the 2 station subway and 3 station aerial options Runs adjacent to the Theme Building, leading to potential visual impacts > The 3 station aerial loop option provides the shortest walk distances to terminals among the rail alignments, but extra travel time around the loop leads to comparable total travel times (ride + walk) to terminals > BRT is the least costly and has shorter walking distances than the rail (LRT and APM) alignments, but Involves the longest total travel times (ride + walk) to airport terminals Is subject to airport roadway congestion

Trade-offs Century Boulevard vs. 98 th Street 28 Alternative 98 th St Century Blvd Average Number of Vertical Level Changes Average Travel Time (minutes) Capital Cost (millions) PRELIMINARY Potential Impacts Visual, Traffic/Access T T T T T T T T 2 29-30 540-1,160 Direct LRT Branch T T T T T T T T 3.3 31-32 470-1,080 T T T T T T T T 4 31-32 620-1,270 Circulator T T T T T T T T 4 29-30 600-1,240 Average from Norwalk, Expo, and South Bay

Trade-Offs Related to Century Blvd & 98 Street Alignments 29 > Century Blvd LRT Requires a second station at Aviation/Century Results in transfers, additional level changes, longer walks and longer travel times > For both Direct LRT Branch and Circulator, the aerial structure along Century Blvd may result in: Visual impacts Impacts to traffic circulation and access to businesses

Breakout Sessions 30 Ten minutes per station Bell will ring when it is time to move to the next station Rotate clockwise through the tables Return to seats for a recap #4 Century Blvd. vs. 98th Street #3 On-Airport Alignments #1 Passenger Convenience #2 Direct LRT Branch vs. Through LAX

31 Upcoming Activities Community Workshops (February-March) Metro Board Meeting (April) Environmental Scoping Meetings (Late Spring) Environmental Document Preparation (2012-2013) Stakeholder Outreach and Coordination with LAWA