IATF REPORT, FALL 2012 Attachment 6

Similar documents
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE January 17, CONTACT: Mayor s Press Office

IATF REPORT, FALL 2012 Attachment 1

IATF REPORT, FALL 2012

CTA Capital Construction Update December 12, 2006

CTA Capital Construction Update May 17, 2007

CTA Blue Line Study Area

All Stations Accessibility Program (ASAP)

Existing CTA Blue Line: From Clinton Station to Forest Park Station IDOT Expansion Alternative: Forest Park Station to Mannheim Road

I-290 Phase I Study Summary of NFPA-130 Analysis of Proposed CTA Station Platform Widths May 2016

Bi-County Transitway/ Bethesda Station Access Demand Analysis

Chapter 4 : THEME 2. Transportation

Central Loop Bus Rapid Transit

Chicago Transit Authority Service Standards and Policies

Balancing the Transportation Needs of a Growing City

CTA Blue Line Study Area

Public Meeting. City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development

Exhibit A Sound Transit Board Resolution R Selecting the bicycle, pedestrian, and parking access improvements to be built for the Puyallup

Capital Needs Assessment Riders Advisory Council July2, 2008

Monthly Ridership Report

Scope of Services January 26, Project Development and Conceptual Engineering for City of Lake Forest Amtrak Station

1.0 INTRODUCTION Organization of this Report Study Area EXISTING CONDITIONS CTA Rail Forest Park Branch...

Proposed FY Capital Improvement Program (CIP) March 5, 2018 Capital Planning Committee 1

Committee Report. Transportation Committee. Business Item No

CITY OF OAKLAND INTRODUCTION

Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Utilizing GIS Models in Prioritizing and Selecting Transportation Projects

Appendix B CTA Transit Data Supporting Documentation

Mobility Corridor Updates. Transit & Active Transportation Projects

MBTA DEPARTMENT OF SYSTEM-WIDE ACCESSIBILITY FIXED ROUTE REPORT December, 2011

TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury

I-405 and SR 522/NE 145th Bus Rapid Transit. Elected Leadership Groups Meeting November 30, 2018

The Screening and Selection of Regionally Significant Projects

PROJECT MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT

Automated Bus Announcement Update Transportation Accessibility Advisory Committee January 6, 2016

BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY

Business Advisory Committee. November 3, 2015

Continued coordination and facilitation with City of Austin staff on documentation of processes to permit construction activities at the site.

Draft Results and Open House

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study

March Government Center Station

Project Status Update January 2017

Overview of Transit Funding and Planning in the PACTS Region

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Harlem Avenue between 63 rd and 65 th

Maryland Gets to Work

Transit in Bay Area Blueprint

RIDERSHIP TRENDS. March 2017

A Transit Plan for the Future. Draft Network Plan

CITY OF TORRANCE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION INFRASTRUCTURE UPDATE

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report

Janice Fortunato Senior Director Business Partnerships

6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Challenges in a Post-Katrina Environment East-West Corridor Project Overview February, 2007

Table Station Elements

2/1/2018. February 1, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Develop ground transportation improvements to make the Airport a multi-modal regional

NAVY YARD BALLPARK STATION ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS STUDY. Final Report. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

COMMUNITY REPORT FISCAL YEAR We are making progress, are you on board? GOLD COAST TRANSIT DISTRICT

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

Corridor Management Committee. March 7, 2012

Needs and Community Characteristics

PARTIAL PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FFY

Above & Beyond ADA. Metro Service Councils. Metro s Response to Growing ADA Ridership. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority

Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project Cost / Schedule Update

ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA

VAN NESS AVENUE BUS RAPID TRANSIT

INVEST PRIORITY PROJECTS. IN TRANSIT The Regional Transit Strategic Plan for Chicago and Northeastern Illinois

Update on Bus Stop Enhancements

Quarterly Update Meeting

Chicago to St. Louis High-Speed Rail. IDOT District 8 Crossings. July 29, 2015

Michigan Avenue Corridor Study. Joint Policy / Technical Committee Meeting Wednesday, June 8, 2016

Central City Line Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) Amendment Public Hearing. July 24, 2014

CAPITAL FUND 9510 STREET & SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS

Welcome The City has undertaken a naming exercise for the existing and future LRT lines. The SE to West LRT, as the project has been called to date,

San Rafael Transit Center. Update. Golden Gate Bridge, Highway & Transportation District Transportation Committee of the Board of Directors

HDR Engineering. HART North / South. Tampa Bay Applications Group Meeting May 14, 2009

Note: The October 2007 version of this report has been updated in this December 2008 report to present costs in year 2007 dollars.

Fixing the Line s Canarsie Tunnel. Manhattan CB6 11/5/2018

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018

Public Meeting Thursday, Dec. 15, 2011 Chicago Union Station Union Gallery Room. Welcome

FINAL. Sound Transit Long-Range Plan Update. Issue Paper S.1: Tacoma Link Integration with Central Link. Prepared for: Sound Transit

Development of 220 mph High Speed Rail Service for Illinois. Mark C. Walbrun, PE TranSystems Corporation

Chapter 7: Travel Demand Analysis. Chapter 8. Plan Scenarios. LaSalle Community Center. Image Credit: Town of LaSalle

Mannheim/Higgins. Lee/Touhy. Municipal. Alternate 1), Village of Rosemont (Eastbound. Major Considerations:

January 2008 Chicago Transit Authority

US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017

Background Information about the Metrobus 29 Lines Study

Mobility Corridor Updates. Transit & Active Transportation Projects

Department of Procurement Services. March 22, Addendum Number 2. To REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS ( RFP ) For

7000 Series Railcar Program Overview

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Paid Parking at Park & Ride Lots: Framing the Issues. Capital Programs Committee May 2014

Broward County Intermodal Center And People Mover. AASHTO Value Engineering Conference Presentation. September 1, 2009 San Diego, CA

Arterial Bus Rapid Transit. System Policy Oversight Committee April 7, 2014

METROPOLITIAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY 2018 JULY and NOVEMBER FINANCIAL PLAN BUDGET REDUCTION PROGRAM (BRPs) ($ in millions) - Fav/(Unfav)

Metro Green Line to LAX Alternatives Analysis. March 2012

Valley Metro: Past, Present and Future. September 11, 2014

Transcription:

IATF REPORT, FALL 2012 Attachment 6 6. Presentation, January 4, 2011 Meeting

Infrastructure Accessibility Task Force (IATF) January 4, 2011

January Agenda Summary of Concept Plans 10 min Irving Park Overview and Challenges 25 min Overview of Downtown Rehab Program CDOT 10 min Washington/Wabash Reconstruction CDOT 20 min Adams and Wabash Concept Plan 15 min Discussion on Evaluation Criteria and Methodology - 30 min Next Steps 5 min 2

Summary of Concept Plans Station Scope of Work Est. Cost Racine (Forest Park) Scheme A Scheme B Scheme C Remove non-compliant ramp, install enclosed ADA compliant ramp. New elevator, new stairs, new walkway, update existing fare array, relocate electrical room. New elevator with new enclosed walkway and new enclosed ADA compliant ramp, reconfigure infrastructure and fare array. ~$3M ~$6M ~$8M 63 rd Street (Dan Ryan) New elevator, existing stair and escalator to remain. ~$2M Addison (O Hare) Adams/Wabash (Loop) Scheme A Adams/Wabash (Loop) Scheme B New elevator, modify existing fare array and other infrastructure, replace exist stair at new location, Existing escalator remain. Install 2 new elevators, new transfer bridge, new CA room at platform level Install 3 new elevators, 3 new enclosed walkways, reconfigure existing fare control area at mezzanine ~$5M ~20M ~20M 3

Irving Park Station Overview 4

5 Irving Park Entrance/Exit

Irving Park Entrance/ Exit 6

7 Pulaski Entrance/Exit

Pulaski Entrance/ Exit 8

Irving Park Station Accessibility Challenges Insufficient walkway widths Long station configuration - elevated walkways to berthing platform Complex entrances and exits to and from street level Non compliant curb ramps in areas outside of stations Emergency Exit Requirements (NFPA 130) and Chicago Building Code (CBC) 9

Irving Park Station Possible Ideas Irving Park North Entrance/Exit Add new station house with CA, one elevator and one straight run stair. Irving Park South Entrance/Exit Close off existing North Entrance/Exit, Add elevator at existing station house. Pulaski East Entrance/Exit Add new station house with CA, one elevator, and one straight run stair. Pulaski West Entrance/Exit Close off existing East Entrance/Exit, add elevator at existing station house. 10

Overview of Downtown Rehabilitation Program 11

CTA and CDOT Partnership Overview and History of CDOT in CTA Subway Station Program. Funding Sources and Allocations for CTA Stations. 12

Current CDOT efforts at CTA stations Grand/State (Red Line Subway Station) Construction complete by end of 2011. LaSalle Congress Intermodal Transfer Center Construction complete by mid 2011. LaSalle/Clark/Division Design 90% completed. Pending Construction Funding. State/Lake Loop Elevated Conceputal design completed. Pending Design and Construction Funding. Washington/Wabash Loop Elevated Conceptual design completed. Pending Design and Construction Funding. 13

Washington/Wabash Loop Elevated Station 14

Randolph / Wabash (Removed) Proposed Station at Washington / Wabash Madison / Wabash (Removed) NORTH 15

Washington/Wabash Loop Elevated Station Consolidation of two stations into one: The proposed Washington / Wabash elevated station allows for greater efficiencies for the system by combining the Randolph / Wabash and Madison / Wabash stations into one. Decreases travel time around the Loop Elevated Lower CTA facility maintenance costs Lower CTA labor costs LOCATION OF PROPOSED STATION 16

Washington/Wabash Elevated Loop Station Project Scope of Work The proposed Washington / Wabash elevated station will be located on Wabash Avenue south of Washington Street and will replace existing stations at Randolph / Wabash and Madison / Wabash. The current Randolph/Wabash and Madison/Wabash stations are not accessible; the new station will meet all ADA standards with new elevators and escalators. Platform capacity will increase from the existing 7-6 platform width to 10-0 to 13-0 widths. The proposed station will have 13 turnstiles 17

Retail Circulation Paid Area Rail Operations Station Support 18

Circulation Paid Area 19

Retail Circulation Paid Area Rail Operations Station Support 20

21 VIEW LOOKING SOUTH FROM WASHINGTON STREET

22 PLATFORM VIEW

23 VIEW SHOWING OUTER LOOP ELEVATOR ACCESSIBILITY

Why Downtown Renovations have Significant Cost Public Way Work (street, vehicle & pedestrian staging) Construction Staging (limited access for equipment & storage areas) Utilities Material Costs (steel, granite, stainless steel ) Cost of Systems (fare array and other infrastructure ) 24

Washington/Wabash Elevated Loop Station Schedule and Costs Phase I Engineering completed: 2004 Phase II Engineering Start/End: Start: 2013 End: 2016 Cost: $4.5M Construction Start/End: Start: 2016 End: 2018 Cost: $75M Funding Source: TBD Last Major Capital Improvement: Randolph / Wabash: 1896 Madison / Wabash: 1896 25

Concept Plan (Adams/Wabash) 26

Adams/Wabash Loop Elevated

Adams/Wabash Plan Views Circulation Paid Area Rail Operations

29 Evaluation Criteria Follow Up

Follow up items from December Ridership summer vs winter months Gap use only along the line distance Education utilize college enrollment data Seniors created separate criterion (Senior Ridership, Senior Services, Senior Housing) Created criteria University with enrollment data Categorize criteria into Origins and Destinations Top criteria determined from December Mtg: (Ridership, PWD ridership, Gaps, Employment, Paratransit home addresses, POI) 30

31 Updated Evaluation Criteria Ridership total CTA ridership by station (10/09 to 09/10) PWD Ridership CTA rail ridership for PWD farecard types by station (10/09 to 9/10) Senior Ridership CTA rail ridership for seniors Gaps Along the Line distances to closest ADA station Employment 2010 & 2040 forecast no. of jobs Education Count of high schools and colleges University - Enrollment data Seniors Services Senior centers, hospitals and health centers. POI Points of Interest theatres, public facilities Population 2010 & 2040 forceast population Paratransit Registered paratransit home addresses Senior Housing Senior housing locations Connections Count of CTA and Pace routes Italic text indicate criteria were updated

Proposed Criteria Weights Ridership and Station Gaps: Ridership (15%) PWD Ridership (10%) Senior Ridership (5%) Gaps (10%) = Total 40% Origins Population (10%) Paratransit address (15%) Senior Housing (5%) Total = 30% Destinations Employment (15%) University (5%) Senior Services (5%) Points of Interest (5%) Total = 30% 32 Bold text indicate top criteria determined in December Meeting

Preliminary Schedule and Deliverable - Updated Review station schemes preliminary schedule November 2010 Racine (Elevator and Ramps) December 2010 63 rd /Dan Ryan, Addison/O Hare January 2011 Irving Park/O Hare Challenges, CDOT update on Washington/Wabash Reconstruction, Adams/Wabash (Loop Rehab concept). February 2011 Wilson (Rehab & Reconstruction), CTA Electronic Communication Overview March 2011 TBD (Rehab), CDOT update on Clark/Division (Reconstruction) April 2011 Damen/Milwaukee and Austin/Lake Potential Deliverable Recommendations on next station accessibility projects Top tier station concept schemes with planning cost estimates White paper on other policy recommendations 33

34 Appendix

Evaluation Methodology Updated list of criteria Scored stations by each criteria (Top 20% gets a 5, 2 nd 20% gets a 4, etc.) Assign weight percentages to each criteria (variable) Calculate weighted score Determine top stations for each geographic area or system wide 35

Geographic Regions North Red & Purple Line Branch Northwest (O Hare) West Line (Harlem/Forest Park) South Branch (Dan Ryan) Loop Outer Central Business District (CBD) 36

IATF REPORT, FALL 2012 Attachment 7 7. Presentation, February 1, 2011 Meeting

Infrastructure Accessibility Task Force (IATF) February 1, 2011

February Agenda Electronic Communication Overview 20 min Evaluation Criteria and Methodology - 30 min Adams and Wabash Concept Plans 40 min LaSalle/Clark/Division 20 min CDOT Station Survey 5 min Next Steps 5 min 2

Electronic Communication Overview Herb Nitz, P.E. GM, Enterprise Communication Systems 3

CTA Electronic Communications Existing Systems: CTA toll-free Customer Assistance 1-888-YOUR-CTA / 1-888-CTA-TTY1 (hearing impaired) Elevator Status, Disabled Assistance CTA web page www. transitchicago.com Rail/Bus Status, Elevator Status Rail Station Customer Assistance Call Buttons Rail Station Audio Announcement System (i.e. PA) Rail Station Dynamic Signage 4

CTA CA Call Buttons Each rail station has Customer Assistance call buttons in the stationhouse and on each platform. Activating a CA call button will generate an audio broadcast and a visual text message at the station that a customer needs assistance in the respective area. Local to particular rail station 5

CTA Audio Announcement System Three generations of audio systems: 58 of 144 rail stations have modern digital system (40%) 2-5 year old system 55 of 144 rail stations have obsolete digital audio system (38%) 15+ year old system End of life, limited repair capability 31 of 144 rail stations have no digital audio capability (22%) 30+ year old system Functionally obsolete 6

CTA Dynamic Signage CTA Dynamic Signs at rail stations (i.e. scrolling marquees) Single and Multi-line LED signs Part of station public address audio announcement system Typically 1 sign face per stationhouse in paid area Typically 8 sign faces per station platform(s) 7

CTA Dynamic Signage CTA Dynamic Signs at rail stations (i.e. scrolling marquees) 42 of 144 rail stations have no signs (30%) 85 of 144 rail stations have scrolling LED sign (59%) Majority more than 15 years old 17 of 144 rail stations have LCD signs (11%) Installed within 2 years 8

CTA Electronic Communications Pending Projects DEDICATED ELEVATOR STATUS DISPLAYS Phase 1 Install above turnstiles to provide real-time elevator status information from CTA s Control Center. Locate sign to inform CTA customers prior to paying fare. Estimated implementation phase: 1Q2011 Estimated cost: $200K (existing funding) 9

CTA Electronic Communications Pending Projects DEDICATED ELEVATOR STATUS DISPLAYS Phase 2 Provide ADA accessible audio functionality to visual status solution. Consider extremely noisy audio environment at rail stations when selecting audio solution. Possibly leverage audio solution from separate bus shelter signage project (to be under contract 1Q11) Estimated cost: TBD 10

11 Evaluation Criteria Follow Up

Follow up items from December Ridership summer vs winter months Gap use only along the line distance Education utilize college enrollment data Seniors created separate criterion (Senior Ridership, Senior Services, Senior Housing) Created criteria University with enrollment data Categorize criteria into Origins and Destinations Top criteria determined from December Mtg: (Ridership, PWD ridership, Gaps, Employment, Paratransit home addresses, POI) 12

13 Updated Evaluation Criteria Ridership total CTA ridership by station (10/09 to 09/10) PWD Ridership CTA rail ridership for PWD farecard types by station (10/09 to 9/10) Senior Ridership CTA rail ridership for seniors Gaps Along the Line distances to closest ADA station Employment 2010 & 2040 forecast no. of jobs Education Count of high schools and colleges University - Enrollment data Seniors Services Senior centers, hospitals and health centers. POI Points of Interest theatres, public facilities Population 2010 & 2040 forceast population Paratransit Registered paratransit home addresses Senior Housing Senior housing locations Connections Count of CTA and Pace routes Italic text indicate criteria were updated

Proposed Criteria Weights Ridership and Station Gaps: Ridership (15%) PWD Ridership (10%) Senior Ridership (5%) Gaps (10%) = Total 40% Origins Population (10%) Paratransit address (15%) Senior Housing (5%) Total = 30% Destinations Employment (15%) University (5%) Senior Services (5%) Points of Interest (5%) Total = 30% 14 Bold text indicate top criteria determined in December Meeting

Resulting Stations by Region Loop Northwest (NW) Randolph/Wabash Damen- Blue State/Lake Belmont O Hare Adams/Wabash Irving Park O Hare Loop Outer South Dan Ryan Clark/Division North/Clybourn Harrison (all on Red Line) North Garfield - Red 63 rd -Red 87 th -Red West Wilson - Red Austin- Green Line Lawrence Red Racine Blue Line Argyle - Red Pulaski Blue Line 15

Concept Plan (Adams/Wabash) 16

Adams/Wabash Existing Cond. 1. Existing East Entrance 17

Adams/Wabash Existing Cond. 2. Top of Stairs at Mezzanine 18

Adams/Wabash Existing Cond. 3. At Mezzanine Unpaid Side 19

Adams/Wabash Existing Cond. 4. At Mezzanine Paid Area Side 20

Adams/Wabash Existing Cond. 5. Stairs from Mezzanine to Platform 21

Adams/Wabash Existing Cond. 6. Stairs from Platform to Transfer Bridge 22

Adams/Wabash Existing Cond. 7. South Transfer Bridge 23

Adams/Wabash Existing Cond. 8. South Transfer Bridge 24

Adams/Wabash Existing Cond. 9. Existing West Entrance 25

Scheme A Street, Mezz, Platform Circulation Paid Area Rail Operations Station Support 26

Scheme A Platform Circulation Paid Area Rail Operations Station Support Circulation Paid Area Rail Operations Station Support 27

Adams/Wabash Scheme A Exist South Transfer Bridge (East Side Looking North) Proposed elevator location at street level Circulation Paid Area Rail Operations Station Support 28

Scheme B Street and Mezz Circulation Paid Area Rail Operations Station Support 29

Scheme B Platform Circulation Paid Area Rail Operations Station Support 30

Adams/Wabash Scheme B 1. Exist East Entrance (Looking South) Circulation Paid Area Rail Operations Station Support 31

Adams/Wabash Scheme B 2. Existing North East Opening (Looking South) where new walkway is proposed once you exit the new elevator Circulation Paid Area Rail Operations Station Support 32

Adams/Wabash Scheme B Circulation 3. Existing North East Opening (walkway location to Mezzanine) Paid Area Rail Operations Station Support 33

Adams/Wabash Scheme B 4. Enter into Mezzanine Unpaid Area Circulation Paid Area Rail Operations Station Support 34

Adams/Wabash Platform Plan 5. Existing Outer Platform (At location of Proposed Elevator) Circulation Paid Area Rail Operations Station Support 35

LaSalle/Clark/Division Rehabilitation 36

Project Location Location of LaSalle / Clark / Division Subway Project NORTH 37

38 Phase I and Phase II Location

Project Scope of Work The Red Line Subway station was built in 1943. Renovation of this station will upgrade the deteriorated and out modeled facility and enhance station appearance and operation. The 1943 station is not accessible; the new station will meet ADA standards including elevators and current city codes. Mezzanine and platform remodeling will comply with the current State Street Red Line materials and CTA design standards. The project is divided up into 2 Phases : LaSalle / Division Mezzanine Clark / Division Mezzanine and Platform 39

Phase 1: LaSalle / Division Red Line Mezzanine The project includes construction of a new ADA accessible mezzanine built at the LaSalle end of the platform. The mezzanine will include escalators and ADA elevator access to the platform. The project will also include infrastructure upgrades. The mezzanine will also include : energy efficient lighting new fare collection equipment granite floors communication equipment speaker systems security monitoring equipment 40

Phase 1: LaSalle / Division Red Line Street ELEVATOR Circulation Paid Area Rail Operations Station Support LaSalle / Division - Street Level Plan 41

Phase 1: LaSalle / Division Red Line Mezzanine Retail Circulation Paid Area Rail Operations Station Support LaSalle / Division - Mezzanine and Platform Level Plans 42

Phase 2: Clark / Division Red Line Mezzanine and Platform The project includes a complete renovation of Clark / Division mezzanine and platform. New wall and ceiling architectural finishes, additional fare collection equipment, improved lighting, updated communication equipment and speaker system. The project will also include infrastructure upgrades. New signage, stairs, escalators and other infrastructure will also be installed. 43

Phase 2: Clark / Division Red Line Street Level Circulation 44

Phase 2: Clark / Division Red Line Mezzanine Retail Circulation Paid Area Rail Operations Shared Staff Spaces Station Support Clark / Division - Mezzanine Level Plan 45

Phase 2: Clark / Division Red Line Platform Level Circulation Paid Area Rail Operations Station Support 46

47 LaSalle/Division Mezzanine view looking East

48 LaSalle/Division Mezzanine view looking West

LaSalle / Clark / Division Red Line Subway Project Schedule and Costs Phase I Engineering completed: 2004 Phase II Engineering Start/End: Start: 2005 End: 2012 Cost: $5.5M Construction Phase 1 Start/End: Start: 2012 End: 2014 Cost: $75M Construction Phase 2 Start/End: Start: 2014 End: 2016 Cost: $20M Funding Source: FTA/IDOT Last Major Capital Improvement: 1943 49

Preliminary Schedule and Deliverable - Updated Review station schemes preliminary schedule November 2010 Racine (Elevator and Ramps) December 2010 63 rd /Dan Ryan, Addison/O Hare January 2011 Irving Park/O Hare Challenges, CDOT update on Washington/Wabash Reconstruction, Adams/Wabash (Loop Rehab concept). February 2011 Electronic Communication Overview, Adams/Wabash Loop additional rehab concepts, CDOT Clark/Division (Reconstruction) March 2011 North Red Purple Line Modernization Overview, review of IATF white paper outline April 2011 Damen/Milwaukee and Austin/Lake Potential Deliverable Recommendations on next station accessibility projects Top tier station concept schemes with planning cost estimates White paper on other policy recommendations 50