Battery Electric Bus Evaluation Results

Similar documents
U.S. Zero Emission Bus Evaluation Results & Status. Leslie Eudy National Renewable Energy Laboratory May 16, 2016

Foothill Transit Battery Electric Bus Performance Results

Fuel Cell Buses in U.S. Transit Fleets: Current Status 2017

Zero Emission Bus Deployment Best Practices and Lessons Learned from Around the World

Battery-Electric Buses 101. Speaker: Erik Bigelow, Senior Project Manager, Center for Transportation and the Environment, Atlanta, GA

COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*

COMPARISON OF FIXED & VARIABLE RATES (25 YEARS) CHARTERED BANK ADMINISTERED INTEREST RATES - PRIME BUSINESS*

Federal Transit Administration s National Fuel Cell Bus Program

NYCT OPERATING EXPERIENCE WITH HYBRID TRANSIT BUSES

Commercial-in-Confidence Ashton Old Baths Financial Model - Detailed Cashflow

APTA STATE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PARTNERSHIPS CONFERENCE

Feasibility of BEB s and Designing the Electric Road Map

Trending to Zero: Battery Electric Buses in Public Transit

Solano County Transit

Zero Emission Bus pilot program CALACT

Battery Electric Bus Technology Review. Victoria Regional Transit Commission September 19, 2017 Aaron Lamb

Electrified Transportation Challenges

All Electric Buses for Transit - Overview and Discussion

NREL Transportation and Vehicles: Fleet DNA & Commercial Vehicle Technologies. Josh Eichman and Ken Kelly National Renewable Energy Laboratory

Pathways to the Zero-Emission Bus CTA s 51 st Annual Fall Conference & Expo

APTA Sustainability Conference August 8, 2017

Transitioning to a Zero-Emission Fleet: King County Metro Transit

Sound Transit Operations July 2016 Service Performance Report. Ridership

Emerging Technologies

Hybrid Electric Solution for OEM Commercial Vans and Trucks Dr. Edward Lovelace

The International Cost Estimating and Analysis Association (ICEAA) Southern California Chapter September 9, 2015

Fuel Cell Buses in U.S. Transit Fleets: Current Status 2008

Performance Measures 4 th Quarter/Year End 2010

ZERO-EMISSION TRANSIT BUS AND REFUELING TECHNOLOGIES AND DEPLOYMENT STATUS: A REVIEW ACROSS U.S. TRANSIT AGENCIES

Opportunities in the Zero Emission Medium and Heavy Duty Vehicle Market

Hybrid-Electric Drive Systems for Heavy Duty Vehicles

Performance Measures Second Quarter 2012

Beyond the Pilot Depot Considerations for a Transition to 100% ZEB Fleet

Economic and Air Quality Benefits of Electric Vehicles in Nevada

Fleet Performance Results Using Biodiesel

REAL-WORLD HYDROGEN TECHNOLOGY VALIDATION

Balance from your previous bill $0.00 Meter # Basic Charge: 17 $ /day 3.23* Energy charge:¹ 2

Montgomery County Department of General Services DGS Delivering Green Service

Bringing Hydrogen Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles to the Golden State

Innovation in Transport. Mike Waters

Fuel cell Electric Bus : It works and it s ready! Geert Van Hecke Head of Public Transport Van Hool OSLO,April 17, 2018

Damian HERD Nissan North America, Inc EV Business Development Manager August 2014

Automated Occupancy Detection October 2015 (Phase I) Demonstration Results Presented by Kathy McCune

In-Use Evaluation of Transit Buses Operated on Biodiesel Blends (B20) by St Louis Metro

Ballard Power Systems

Clean public transport, role of fuel cell buses

Thank you for the opportunity to

METRO CNG Program Phase I Update. Customer Service Committee April 2014

Additional Transit Bus Life Cycle Cost Scenarios Based on Current and Future Fuel Prices

New Flyer of America Inc. The State of Charging Standards and Deployment. David Warren Director of Sustainable Transportation

Future Powertrain Technology for the North American Market: Diesel & Hydrogen

Distribution Capacity Impacts of Plug In Electric Vehicles. Chris Punt, P.E. MIPSYCON 2014

WIM #37 was operational for the entire month of September Volume was computed using all monthly data.

Biomethane Day Leyland Bio-CNG Project

CNG Fueling Stations

Results of the High V.LO-City & HyTRANSIT projects

Past Due. Account Charges. Contract Charges Security Deposit Due - Jun 09, , Customer Service. Jun 19, PAST DUE $1,693.

Zero Emission Bus Workshop San Diego Sierra Club

Managed Electric Vehicle Charging: New Opportunities for Demand Response.

California Low Emission Truck Policies and Plans

Overview. 1. About UQM 2. The market 3. Market strategy 4. Financials

Liquid Propane Autogas. Product Introduction & Overview

Commercialization of fuel cell commercial vehicles

2016 UC Solar Research Symposium

ELECTRIC VEHICLE MARKET UPDATE

Draft Results and Recommendations

WIM #31 US 2, MP 8.0 EAST GRAND FORKS, MN JANUARY 2015 MONTHLY REPORT

WIM #29 was operational for the entire month of October Volume was computed using all monthly data.

2018 American Zero Emission Bus Conference INNOVATIVE CLEAN TRANSIT PROPOSED REGULATION

Energy Transformation In the Transport Sector. FRANCIS ROMANO Knights Energy

Progress of GEF-UNDP-China Fuel Cell Bus Demonstration Project

PANEL DISCUSSION: REAL LIFE EXPERIENCE. Jaimie Levin Kirt Conrad Mark Finnicum Dr. Yann Guezennec Debbie Swickard

What the Future Holds for Automotive Powertrains

The Changing Relationship Between the Price of Crude Oil and the Price At the Pump

Evaluation of Hybrid Vehicle Business Strategies. Should Next-Generation Hybrids Use Li-Ion or NiMH Batteries?

Zero Emission Truck Commercialization Summary of the I-710 Project Zero-Emission Truck Commercialization Study Draft Report

ALTERNATIVE POWER IN THE GLOBAL SUPPLY CHAIN

Measured Performance of a High-Efficiency Solar-Assisted Heat Pump Water Heater

2010 Sustainability & Public Transportation Workshop:

Strategic Planning for Metro s Transition to Zero Emission Buses. October 2017

ADVANCED VEHICLE TECHNOLOGIES RESEARCH

King County Metro. Sustainably and equitably achieving a zero-emission fleet

International Experience with Electric and Zero Emission Buses

Economics of Integrating Renewables DAN HARMS MANAGER OF RATE, TECHNOLOGY & ENERGY POLICY SEPTEMBER 2017

Dr. Jörg Wind Daimler s road to FCEV market introduction

Trends in Green Vehicle Technologies A Perspective from the Federal Transit Administration

A CASE FOR FUEL CELL ELECTRIC BUSES. Jaimie Levin Director of West Coast Operations, CTE

TOGETHER CHARGING A BRIGHTER FUTURE.

New Flyer has 50 years of experience manufacturing zero-emission buses, has delivered over 6,400 buses powered by electric motors and batteries in

Green Bus Technology Plan

Distributed Energy Storage John Steigers Generation Project Development Energy / Business Services

2016 ADVISORY PANEL ADVANCED VEHICLE TECHNOLOGIES. Michael Lewis Center for Electromechanics The University of Texas at Austin 5/10/2016

Customer Service, Operations and Security Committee. Information Item III-A. January 12, 2017

Central London Congestion Charging Scheme. 17 March 2005 Impacts - 9 th Annual Conference. Michele Dix Director Congestion Charging Division

ANCR CRU Statistics February 2007 to December 2007

Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County Lee Gibson, Executive Director Roger Hanson, Senior Planner

Presentation to the Customer Service, Operations and Safety Committee OPERATIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

INSERO QUARTERLY, Q4 2014

Forward-Looking Statements

Fleet Options. Information and Comparison

Transcription:

Battery Electric Bus Evaluation Results Leslie Eudy Matt Jeffers 2017 APTA Bus and Paratransit Conference, Reno, NV May 8, 2017

NREL Snapshot Dedicated Solely to Advancing Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Leading clean-energy innovation for more than 37 years ~1,760 employees with world-class facilities Campus is a living model of sustainable energy Economic impact at $872M nationwide Owned by the Department of Energy and Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy 2

NREL Role in ZEB Evaluation 3 rd Party evaluation of advanced technology in realworld service Established evaluation protocol provides consistent data collection and analysis for comparison Provide feedback to government (federal, state, local) to understand status and continue funding necessary R&D Share information with the transit industry that will aid in purchase decisions on the technology o Unbiased data in common format o Comparison to baseline technology 3

Evaluation Objectives and DOE/FTA Targets Validate zero emission buses 1 (ZEB) performance and cost compared to DOE/DOT targets and conventional technologies Document progress and lessons learned on implementing ZEBs in transit operations to address barriers to market acceptance Current Targets 2 Units 2016 Target Ultimate Target Bus lifetime Years/miles 12/500,000 12/500,000 Powerplant lifetime Hours 18,000 25,000 Bus availability % 85 90 Roadcall frequency (bus/fuel cell system) Operation time Miles between roadcall Hours per day/ days per week 3,500/15,000 4,000/20,000 20/7 20/7 Maintenance cost $/mile 0.75 0.40 Fuel economy Miles per diesel gallon equivalent 8 8 1 ZEBs can be battery electric buses (BEB) or fuel cell electric buses (FCEB) 2 Fuel Cell Technologies Program Record # 12012, Sep 2012, www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/12012_fuel_cell_bus_targets.pdf 4

Current Status of BEBs Fleet Minimum Fleet Maximum Fleet Average Bus lifetime (years) 0.8 2.9 2.3 Bus lifetime (miles) 17,960 85,274 64,045 Bus availability (%) 74 97 88 Charges (number per day) 1 31 8 Roadcall frequency bus (MBRC) 5,656 Roadcall frequency propulsion system 15,023 Roadcall frequency energy storage system 320,496 Operation time per day (hours) <1 22.4 9 Scheduled and unscheduled maintenance cost ($/mile) 1 0.13 0.29 0.19 Fuel economy (miles per DGE) 16.09 18.72 17.29 Data from 2 fleets 15 total buses 1 Buses are currently under warranty all advanced technology maintenance is handled by OEM 5

Foothill Transit, West Covina, California BEBs service Start: April 2014 Baseline comparison: NABI CNG, 42-ft Foothill Transit BEB Specifications FCEB Identifier BEB Number of Buses 12 Bus OEM Proterra Bus length/height 35 ft / 126 in Charging strategy Fast-charge, on-route Motor Permanent magnet, UQM, PP220 Rated Power (kw) 220 (peak) Energy Storage - OEM Lithium-titanate Capacity 368 volts, 88 kwh 6

Fuel Economy (mi/dge) Average High Temperature ( F) Foothill Transit BEB Efficiency 20 18 100 90 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 BEB (35-ft) CNG (42-ft) Avg High Temp ( F) BEB equivalent fuel economy 4x higher than CNG buses. High cost of electricity results in higher cost per mile. 7

Availability Foothill Transit BEB Availability by Month 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% BEB CNG Target 0% Availability generally over the target. Overall availability for data period is 90% 8

Foothill Transit BEB Availability - Overall Days Available 90.0% Unavailable 10.0% PM 0.3% Electric drive 2.8% Charging issues 0.2% ESS 0.6% Bus 5.6% Bus issues are the primary reasons for unavailability, followed by electric drive Transmission 0.5% BEB Fleet Number % Available 8,550 90 Bus 527 5.6 PM 25 0.3 Electric Drive 263 2.8 Charging issues 23 0.2 ESS 55 0.6 Transmission 52 0.5 Total days 9,495 100 9

Foothill Transit BEB Reliability Early results show the BEB performance exceeds the ultimate targets. 10

King County Metro, Seattle, WA (TIGGER) BEB in service date: April 2016 3 Proterra, 40-ft Catalyst buses and fast charging station (8 more on order) Baseline buses: diesel, diesel hybrid, and electric trolley buses KC Metro BEB Specifications FCEB Identifier BEB Number of Buses 3 Bus OEM Proterra Bus length/height 40 ft / 126 in Charging strategy Fast-charge, on-route Motor Permanent magnet, UQM, PP220 Rated Power (kw) 220 (peak) Energy Storage Lithium-titanate Capacity 331 volts, 106 kwh 11

KC Metro BEB Efficiency BEB equivalent fuel economy 3x higher than diesel buses and 2.6x higher than diesel hybrid buses. High cost of electricity results in higher cost per mile. 12

KC Metro Availability by Month Overall availability for data period: BEB 84% Diesel hybrids 92% Diesel 88% Trolley 87% 13

KC Metro Availability - Overall Primary reasons for unavailability BEB: Bus related issues, followed by electric drive Hybrid and diesel buses: Bus related issues Trolley buses: current collection, followed by bus related issues 14

KC Metro Reliability BEB bus-related MBRC increasing. To date, no ESS related roadcalls have occurred. 15

Remaining Challenges and Barriers for ZEBs Specific to BEBs Plan/build of opportunity charging stations & garage chargers Select appropriate routes for technology fastcharge, in-depot charging Address challenge of electric rates and demand charges Scale up for larger fleets how best to accommodate plug in charging/ parking Training transition for maintenance staff Develop supply chain for parts 16

Web site: http://www.nrel.gov/hydrogen/proj_fc_bus_eval.html Contact Info: Leslie Eudy 303-275-4412 leslie.eudy@nrel.gov Matt Jeffers 303-275-3778 Matthew.jeffers@nrel.gov

Fuel Cell Buses in Public Transit Matthew Post 2017 APTA Bus and Paratransit Conference, Reno, NV May 8, 2017

Evaluation Objectives and DOE/FTA Targets Validate fuel cell electric bus (FCEB) performance and cost compared to DOE/DOT targets and conventional technologies Document progress and lessons learned on implementing fuel cell systems in transit operations to address barriers to market acceptance Current Targets* Units 2016 Target Ultimate Target Bus lifetime Years/miles 12/500,000 12/500,000 Powerplant lifetime Hours 18,000 25,000 Bus availability % 85 90 Roadcall frequency (bus/fuel cell system) Operation time Miles between roadcall Hours per day/ days per week 3,500/15,000 4,000/20,000 20/7 20/7 Maintenance cost $/mile 0.75 0.40 Fuel economy Miles per diesel gallon equivalent 8 8 * Fuel Cell Technologies Program Record # 12012, Sep 2012, www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/12012_fuel_cell_bus_targets.pdf 19

FCEB Specifications Specifications for FCEBs included in data summary FCEB Identifier ACT ZEBA SL AFCB UCI AFCB Transit agency AC Transit SunLine UCI Location Oakland, CA Thousand Palms, CA Irvine, CA Number of buses 13 4 1 Bus OEM Van Hool ElDorado National Bus length/height 40 ft / 136 in. 40 ft / 140 in. Fuel cell OEM UTC Power Ballard Model PureMotion 120 Fcvelocity HD6 Power (kw) 120 150 Hybrid system Siemens ELFA, Van Hool integration BAE Systems HybriDrive Design strategy Fuel cell dominant Fuel cell dominant Energy storage OEM EnerDel A123 Type Li-ion Nanophosphate Li-ion Capacity 17.4 kwh 11 kwh Number of cylinders 8 8 Capacity (kg)/pressure (bar) 40 / 350 50 / 350 Technology readiness level 7 7 OEM = original equipment manufacturer ACT ZEBA = AC Transit Zero Emission Bay Area SL AFCB = SunLine American Fuel Cell Bus UCI = University of California at Irvine ACT ZEBA SL AFCB UCI AFCB 20

Current Status of FCEBs Fleet Minimum Fleet Maximum Fleet Average Bus lifetime (years) 1.3 6.4 4.7 Bus lifetime (miles) 32,485 167,352 118,989 Power plant lifetime (hours) 3,589 23,423 13,801 Bus availability (%) 44 93 76 Fuel fills (number per day) 1 1 1 Roadcall frequency bus (MBRC) 4,710 Roadcall frequency propulsion 8,146 Roadcall frequency fuel cell system 20,705 Operation time (average hours per day) 7.4 13.7 11.8 Scheduled and unscheduled maintenance cost ($/mile) 1 0.46 1.61 1.03 Range (miles) 215 274 247 Fuel economy (miles per DGE) 5.66 7.22 6.51 Data Summary from 3 fleets 18 total buses. 1 Buses from two fleets are still under warranty, although most of the maintenance is handled by transit staff 21

Total Hours FC Powerplant Life Top fuel cell powerplant (FCPP) >23,800 hours, surpassing DOE/DOT 2016 target; 67% of FCPPs (12) more than 15,000 hours 30,000 25,000 DOE/DOT Ultimate Target: 25,000 20,000 DOE/DOT 2016 Target: 18,000 15,000 In-service FCPP Average: 14,332 10,000 5,000 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 In-service FCPPs ACT ZEBA SL AFCB UCI AFCB Total hours accumulated on each FCPP as of 2/28/17 22

Jan-15 Feb-15 Mar-15 Apr-15 May-15 Jun-15 Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 Sep-16 Oct-16 Nov-16 Dec-16 Availability (%) Availability Monthly bus availability 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 2015 Summary Average availability: 75% FCPP Availability: 86% 2016 Summary Average availability: 79% FCPP Availability: 94% 20 10 FCEB FC System only 2016 Target DOE/FTA Ultimate Target 0 Availability = planned operation days compared to actual operation days 23

Availability Summary: 2016 Data Battery Related 0% Days Available 79% FC = fuel cell PM = preventive maintenance Unavailable 21% Hybrid Propulsion 5% Bus Related 7% PM = preventive maintenance FC System 6% PM 3% FCEB Fleet Number % Available 4,967 79 FC system 393 6 Hybrid propulsion 310 5 Traction batteries 25 <1 Bus maintenance 411 7 PM 157 3 Total days 6,263 100 24

Fuel Economy (mi/dge) Monthly Fuel Economy Compared to Baseline mpdge = miles per diesel gallon equivalent 8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 FCEB Diesel CNG 0.00 Drop in fuel economy over time could be due to several factors: degradation of fuel cells, changes in routes used, changes in hybrid system calibration 25

Miles between roadcall FCEB Reliability 25,000 20,000 Ultimate FC System MBRC Target 15,000 2016 FC System MBRC Target 10,000 5,000 Ultimate Bus MBRC Target 0 2016 Bus MBRC Target FCEB Bus MBRC FCEB FC System MBRC FCEB reliability surpassed ultimate targets in 2015 Maintenance staff becoming more familiar with system, applying new tools to anticipate and fix issues before they fail in service 26

FCEB Fueling Fueling Experience Dispenser can be located in the fueling aisle with other services Average fueling time: 18 minutes Average fill amount: 20 kilograms 27

Remaining Challenges and Barriers for FCEBs Specific to FCEBs Increase durability and reliability of components Continue transition of build process to OEM Addition of fueling infrastructure Develop robust supply chain for components and parts to lower cost and downtime o o Multiple component suppliers to stabilize supply Standardized with conventional bus components to lower cost Establish support centers for advanced technology components Increase learning curve for maintenance staff o o Develop training specific to FCEBs and incorporate in traditional classes Provide tools to agencies for monitoring and troubleshooting issues Reduce cost, both capital and operating 28

Web site: http://www.nrel.gov/hydrogen/proj_fc_bus_eval.html Contact Info: Matthew Post 303-275-3829 matthew.post@nrel.gov