APPENDIX B. Speed Flow Curves

Similar documents
Project Appraisal Guidelines for National Roads Unit National Parameters Values Sheet

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

JCE 4600 Basic Freeway Segments

VDOT 2008 Road and Bridge Standards Section Transition Curves

SN01 STANDARD NOTES CITY OF SAMMAMISH 2018 FLASHING YELLOW ARROW SIGNALS PROJECT NO. DATE BY APPR REVISION COSA0023 KING COUNTY WASHINGTON

AusRAP assessment of Peak Downs Highway 2013

Bedford Town Centre Transport Modelling. Local Model Validation Report (LMVR) Final Draft

4 COSTS AND OPERATIONS

Implementation Status & Results India Mumbai Urban Transport Project (P050668)

Department for Transport. Transport Analysis Guidance (TAG) Unit Values of Time and Operating Costs

UTC Case Studies Turin, Rome

CHANGE LIST for MDOT Traffic and Safety Geometric Design Guides. May 23, 2017: The following update was made to the web site.

SN01 STANDARD NOTES CITY OF SAMMAMISH 2018 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. DATE BY APPR REVISION COSA0023 KING COUNTY WASHINGTON

TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTS

1 TO 2 2 TO 12 TO 1 10 TO TO 12

INNOVATIVE APPROACH IN ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE SAFETY MANAGEMENT AND ROAD SAFETY IMPACT ASSESSMENT

Conventional Approach

Evaluation of the Rolling Wheel Deflectometer (RWD) in Louisiana. John Ashley Horne Dr. Mostafa A Elseifi

Guidelines for Motorcycling

Verfication of road test normality Parameter Analysis TF Normalisation

CDOT SPF Development and 10 Years of Application. A Practical Approach...

Mr. Kyle Zimmerman, PE, CFM, PTOE County Engineer

AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets

Engineering Dept. Highways & Transportation Engineering

Exhibit H: Typical Traffic Control Plans. North Metro Natural Gas Pipeline Project Routing Study

Traffic Monitoring Report 2017

Traffic Monitoring Report 2016

Transit City Etobicoke - Finch West LRT

Proposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center. Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA

Sight Distance. A fundamental principle of good design is that

Mobility Fee Applications from Research Design

Traffic Micro-Simulation Assisted Tunnel Ventilation System Design

BARRHAVEN FELLOWSHIP CRC 3058 JOCKVALE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

Memorandum. To: Sue Polka, City Engineer, City of Arden Hills. From: Sean Delmore, PE, PTOE. Date: June 21, 2017

1 TO 2 2 TO 3 3 TO 4 11 TO TO 1

Traffic Data For Mechanistic Pavement Design

NORTH RINGROAD OF VALENCIA (CV30) BENIMAMET TO CIUTAT FALLERA AND CONNECTIONS TO BURJASSOT, BENIMAMET, CV30 AND THE FUTURE NORTH PARK ROAD CIT-01

Newark Future. Newark Highway Model Local Model Validation Report

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. June Dear Customer:

2012 SATURN User Group - Leeds

Appendix SAN San Diego, California 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability

Red Line Customer Capacity Update. Fiscal & Management Control Board September 19, 2016

Technical Memorandum Analysis Procedures and Mobility Performance Measures 100 Most Congested Texas Road Sections What s New for 2015

1.3 Research Objective

Summary of Potential Target Formula Scenarios

Guelph Driving School. 246 WOOLWICH ST. Unit C Guelph, Ontario N1H 3V9. Office: Cell:

MEMO. McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION. File Mark VanderSluis, Keyur Shah DATE: October 26, 2009 COPIES: OUR FILE: TO: FROM: Jack Thompson

JCE4600 Fundamentals of Traffic Engineering

APPENDIX E. Traffic Analysis Report

ZINFANDEL LANE / SILVERADO TRAIL INTERSECTION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

Development of Crash Modification Factors for Rumble Strips Treatment for Freeway Applications: Phase I Development of Safety Performance Functions

IV. REVISIONS TO THE DRAFT IS/MND

Section 6H.01 Typical Applications

8. Network Calibration and Validation

Alberta Transportation Rumble Strips - C-TEP Lunch and Learn

Traffic Impact Statement (TIS)

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Output

Figure 1 Map of intersection of SR 44 (Ravenna Rd) and Butternut Rd

Unit 1 - Driving, Mobility and Laws. Chapter 1 - Driving and Mobility

FLAMBOROUGH QUARRY HAUL ROUTE STUDY HAUL ROUTE VIBRATION REPORT. itrans Consulting Inc 100 York Boulevard Richmond Hill, Ontario L4B 1J8

RDE LEGISLATION AND REAL- WORLD EMISSIONS ERMES (TNO/TUG/LAT)

CATEGORY 500 PAVING SECTION 535 PAVEMENT SURFACE PROFILE

The Introduction of Road Safety Audits in Germany

The Highway Safety Manual: Will you use your new safety powers for good or evil? April 4, 2011

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Conversion of Traditional Five Section Head Signal to Flashing Yellow Arrow (FYA) Signal

TIMBERVINE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY Prepared for:

Public transport traffic management systems simulation in Craiova city

Interim Improvement for the Valencia/Kolb Intersection. RTA Board Meeting April 25, 2013

NOTES FOR GUIDANCE. Use the Driver's Record to chart and record your pupil's progress.

DEFINITIONS OF SCENARIOS

Vehicle Performance. Pierre Duysinx. Research Center in Sustainable Automotive Technologies of University of Liege Academic Year

INTERSECTION ANALYSIS PARK AVENUE AND BRADDOCK ROAD (FROSTBURG, MD) FOR LENHART TRAFFIC CONSULTING, INC.

2016 Congestion Report

The Highways Agency is working to improve the M3 between junctions 2 to 4a.

2 Min. Min. Edge of. Edgeline See Note 3 PLAN VIEW. See Note 3. This distance may vary

County State Aid Highway 30 (Diffley Road) and Dodd Road Intersection Study

RICHMOND OAKS HEALTH CENTRE 6265 PERTH STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Guycoki (Eastern) Limited.

Road Surface characteristics and traffic accident rates on New Zealand s state highway network

2 MAJOR MACKENZIE DRIVE WEST JOG ELIMINATION AT HUNTINGTON ROAD CITY OF VAUGHAN

Interstate Operations Study: Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Area Simulation Results

Restricted Crossing U-Turn (RCUT) Intersection Concept, Case Studies, and Design Guide ITE Midwest Annual Meeting June 30, 2015 Branson, MO

State Highway 32 East TIGER Discretionary Grant Application APPENDIX C - BENEFIT COST ANALYSIS REPORT

DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY 1627 MAXIME STREET CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: Subhas Bhargava. July 9, Overview_1.

Initial processing of Ricardo vehicle simulation modeling CO 2. data. 1. Introduction. Working paper

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

(2111) Digital Test Rolling REVISED 07/22/14 DO NOT REMOVE THIS. IT NEEDS TO STAY IN FOR THE CONTRACTORS. SP

Tongaat Hullette Developments - Cornubia Phase 2. Technical Note 02 - N2/M41 AIMSUN Micro-simulation Analysis

Gary Modi, PE(Stolen from Tim Peiples)

Denise Marshall Northumberland County

MERIVALE PRIORITY SQUARE 2852 MERIVALE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: ONT Inc. 25 Winding Way Nepean, Ontario K2C 3H1

Sofia Urban Transport challenges and strategies

Excessive speed as a contributory factor to personal injury road accidents

INTERURBAN ROADS. Scope of Interurban Roads. Scope of Interurban Roads. Scope of Interurban Roads

Intermodality - A Solution to the Problems of Large Urban Agglomerations. Author: Eng. Eugenia Alina Roman

Appendix B CTA Transit Data Supporting Documentation

Welsh Government Procedure & Advice Guidance (PAG) 106/16. Use of Vehicle Activated Signs and Speed Indicator Devices on the Trunk Road Network

WELLINGTON, NEW ZEALAND. PURSUANT to Section 152 of the Land Transport Act I, Harry James Duynhoven, Minister for Transport Safety,

Developing a Methodology for Certifying Heavy Duty Hybrids based on HILS

County State Aid Highway 32 (Cliff Road) and Dodd Road Intersection Study

Transcription:

APPENDIX B Speed Flow Curves 5048375 / LD / 0902 B -1

5048375 / LD / 0902 B -2

B.Speed Flow Curves INTRODUCTION B.1 This appendix describes the implementation of speed flow curves within a SATURN model. Speed-flow curves are used within the model to reflect constraint on demand in line with available network capacity. This is achieved by applying a speed flow curve relationship which represents decreases in link speeds with flow increases, with the characteristics of the road determining the nature of this relationship. COBA SPEED FLOW CURVES B.2 Speed flow curves are used in the Department of Transports COBA appraisal for road schemes. B.3 The Department of Transport speed flow curves take the following form: S 0 V F S(V) S 1 + (S 1 -S 0 )(V-F)/(C-F) F < V C S 1 /(1+S 1 (V-C)/8dC) V > C Where: t is the link time (in hours); d is the link distance (in kilometres); S is the link speed (in kph); S = d / t V is the link flow (in PCU per hour); S0 is the free-flow speed; S1 is the speed at capacity; F is the maximum flow at which free-flow conditions hold; and C is the capacity B.4 The characteristics of the road determine the type of speed flow relationship which exists. COBA splits roads into four types and gives typical speed flow curves for each type, in Part 5 Chapter 9 of DMRB Vol. 13, as follows: Rural Figure 9.1 and Figure 9.2; Sub-Urban Figure 9.4; Urban Figure 9.3; Small town or Village Figure 9.5. SATURN SPEED FLOW CURVES B.5 SATURN uses a curve fitting procedure to create speed flow curves. The formula within SATURN is as follows t = t 0 + a V n where 5048375 / LD / 0902 B -3

t is time on link (analogous to speed) t 0 is free flow time (analogous to free flow speed) a is a constant (determined from speed and flow at capacity) V is link flow n is the power of the curve (determines the length of the flat part and how quickly the curve falls) B.6 The speed-flow curves used in COBA have been converted for use within SATURN. This has subsequently been incorporated into the documentation of speed flow curves given in the SATURN manual (Section 15.9.3). B.7 The speed flow curves used in the Bristol Model are based on those used in COBA, converted to SATURN format. The parameters entered into SATURN are given in Table B.1 together with link indices. Speed flow curves for each index are illustrated in Figures B.1 to B.6 where: Figure B.1 - Rural Buffer and Simulation (Indices 1 to 9 & 44); Figure B.2 - Sub-Urban Buffer (Indices to 15); Figure B.3 - Urban Buffer (Indices 16 to 21); Figure B.4 - Small Town or Village Buffer and Simulation (Indices 22 to 24); Figure B.5 Sub-Urban Simulation (Indices to 37); and Figure B.6 Urban Simulation (Indices to 42). 5048375 / LD / 0902 B -4

Table B.1 Speed Flow Indices Link Index Description Simulatio n (S) or Buffer (B) SO (kph) S2 (kph) F (pcu /hr/ lane) C (pcu /hr/ lane) N (power of the curve) 1 Rural D3 Motorway S/B 116 45 10 25 3.81 2 Rural D2 Motorway S/B 112 45 10 24 3.85 3 Rural D2/D3 AP (A Trunk) S/B 9 45 80 2260 3.66 4 Rural D2/D3 AP (including Motorway Slips) S/B 88 45 80 2180 3.63 5 Rural S3 (Good A) S/B 91 45 10 1860 2.24 6 Rural S3 (Avg. A) S/B 84 45 10 1660 2.13 7 Rural S2 (Good A)/S3 Poor S/B 87 45 880 16 2.16 8 Rural S2 (Avg. A, Good/Avg. B, Good C -50 mph) S/B 78 45 850 1380 2.07 9 Rural S2 (Poor A, Avg. B, Good C mph) S/B 67 45 770 1.79 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 21 22 Suburban D2 (Good A 50 mph) Good - Minor Access (15/km), Intersections (0.4/km) Suburban D2 (Avg. A - mph) Typical - Minor Access (//km), Intersections (0.8/km) Suburban D2 (Poor A mph) Poor - Minor Access (/km), Intersection (1.2) Suburban S2 (Good A - 50 mph) Good - Minor Access (15/km), Intersections (0.4/km) Suburban S2 (Avg. A - mph) Typical - Minor Access (//km), Intersections (0.8/km) Suburban S2 (Poor A mph) Poor - Minor Access (/km), Intersection (1.2) Urban Non-Central S2 (Good A mph) Low Development (50%). Urban Non-Central S2 (Good A mph ) Medium Development (80%) Urban Non-Central S2 (Good-Avg. A, Good B - mph) High Development (90%) Urban Central S2 (Avg. A, Good B - mph) Good Road 2 junctions/km Urban Central S2 (Poor A, Avg. B, Good C - mph) Typical Road 4.5 junctions/km Urban Central S2 (Poor A, Poor B, Poor C mph) Centre Poor Road 9 junctions/km Rural S2 (Village mph) Light Development (35%) B 76 35 50 15 2.79 B 71 35 00 1285 2.65 B 68 35 950 1.94 B 66 25 50 15 3.75 B 61 25 00 1285 3.76 B 58 25 950 2.32 B 54 25 490 980 1.67 B 49 25 390 780 1.56 B 45 25 325 650 1.48 B 37 15 370 7 1.83 B 34 15 315 6 1.73 B 29 15 225 450 1.55 S/B 66 700 10 3.00 5048375 / LD / 0902 B -5

Link Index Description Simulatio n (S) or Buffer (B) SO (kph) S2 (kph) F (pcu /hr/ lane) C (pcu /hr/ lane) N (power of the curve) 23 24 31 32 33 34 35 Rural S2 (Village mph) Typical Development (60%) Rural S2 (Village mph) High Development (90%) Suburban D2 (Good A - 50 mph) Good - Minor Access (15/km), Intersections (0.4/km) Suburban D2 (Avg. A mph) Typical - Minor Access (//km), Intersections (0.8/km) Suburban D2 (Poor A mph) Poor - Minor Access (/km), Intersection (1.2) Suburban S2 (Good A - 50 mph) Good - Minor Access (15/km), Intersections (0.4/km) Suburban S2 (Avg. A/ Good B - mph) Typical - Minor Access (//km), Intersections (0.8/km) Suburban S2 (Poor A /Avg B to mph ) Poor - Minor Access (/km), Intersection (1.2) S/B 57 700 00 3.39 S/B 47 700 880 2.45 S 78 35 50 18 2.94 S 73 35 50 1760 3.18 S 68 35 50 1725 3.47 S 65 25 50 1800 2.71 S 60 50 1750 2.01 S 55 50 1600 1.65 36 Suburban S2 - Residential S 45 21 50 10 1.38 37 Suburban S2 - Residential S 45 21 875 00 1.38 41 42 Urban Central S2 (Avg. A, Good B - mph) Good Road 2 junctions/km Urban Central S2 (Poor A, Avg. B, Good C mph) Typical Road 4.5 junctions/km Urban Central S2 (Poor A, Poor B, Poor C - mph) Centre Poor Road 9 junctions/km S 62 25 48 1800 2.75 S 55 983 1700 2.65 S 47 918 1600 2.55 44 D2 All Purpose Road Climber Lane S 75 35 900 1950 3.68 88 Centroid Connectors S 9999 9999 Note: 1 - In the Highway Model in the simulation that Urban Non-central are not used because the speed flow curves are very similar to the Suburban S2 index 34 / 35. 2 Simulation speed flow curves exclude junction delay. Thus suburban and urban non-central curves are very similar. 5048375 / LD / 0902 B -6

Figure A.1 Speed Flow Curves : Rural Simulation and Buffer 1 1 1 Speed (kph) 0 90 80 70 60 50 Index 1 Index 2 Index 3 Index 4 Index 5 Index 6 Index 7 Index 8 Index 9 Index 44 0 0 250 500 750 00 1250 1500 1750 00 2250 2500 Flow (pcus) Figure B.1 Rural Simulation and Buffer 5048375 / LD / 0902 B -7

80 70 60 Speed (kph) 50 Index Index 11 Index 12 Index 13 Index 14 Index 15 0 0 250 500 750 00 1250 1500 1750 00 2250 2500 Flow (pcus) Figure B.2 Suburban Buffer 5048375 / LD / 0902 B -8

60 50 Speed (kph) Index 16 Index 17 Index 18 Index 19 Index Index 21 0 0 250 500 750 00 1250 1500 1750 00 2250 2500 Flow (pcus) Figure B.3 Urban Buffer 5048375 / LD / 0902 B -9

70 60 50 Speed (kph) Index 22 Index 23 Index 24 0 0 250 500 750 00 1250 1500 1750 00 Flow (pcus) Figure B.4 Small Town or Village Simulation or Buffer 5048375 / LD / 0902 B -

Figure A.5 Speed Flow Curves : Suburban Simulation 90 80 70 Speed (kph) 60 50 Index Index 31 Index 32 Index 33 Index 34 Index 35 Index 36 Index 37 0 0 250 500 750 00 1250 1500 1750 00 2250 2500 Flow (pcus) Figure B.5 Suburban Simulation 5048375 / LD / 0902 B -11

70 60 50 Speed (kph) Index Index 41 Index 42 0 0 250 500 750 00 1250 1500 1750 00 2250 2500 Flow (pcus) Figure B.6 Urban Simulation 5048375 / LD / 0902 B -12