Outline of Definition of Automated Driving Technology

Similar documents
Informal Document ACSF Automatically Commanded Steering Function

Automated Driving UNECE International Harmonization

Economic and Social Council

Proposal of Automated Driving from Ad-hoc group on LKAS/RCP

Automated Driving. Definition for Levels of Automation OICA,

Draft programme of work (PoW) under the 1998 Agreement

GRVA Priorities re: Automated Vehicles Bernie Frost

Difference for "Automatically commanded steering function", "Corrective steering function" and " Autonomous Steering System "

Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF

Mirroring the Mobility of the Future in the Vienna Convention _ A challenging task for UNECE Road Safety Forum.

Economic and Social Council

Industry input to ACSF-18 meeting, June 6-8, 2018 The Hague Homework from ACSF-17

EU Work priorities for for UNECE activities. 1. Working Group on Automated and connected vehicles (GRVA)

Assisted and Automated Driving DEFINITION AND ASSESSMENT: SUMMARY DOCUMENT

Remote Control Parking (RCP)

Aria Etemad Volkswagen Group Research. Key Results. Aachen 28 June 2017

Emergency Steering Function (ESF)

Proposal for the 03 series of amendments to UN Regulation No. 79

Proposal for UN Regulation on AEBS for M1/N1

Revised proposal to amend UN Global Technical Regulation No. 3 (Motorcycle brake systems) I. Statement of technical rationale and justification

E/ECE/324/Rev.1/Add.78/Rev.2/Amend.3 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.1/Add.78/Rev.2/Amend.3

Economic and Social Council

PILOTING AUTOMATED DRIVING ON EUROPEAN ROADS. Aria Etemad Volkswagen Group Research

DEVELOPMENT of REQUIREMENTS for AUTOMATCALLY COMMANDED STEERING FUNCTIONS

Proposal for amendments to ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRVA/2018/9. I. Statement of technical rationale and justification

Advanced Vehicle Control System Development Div.

Rule No. 1. Scope Definitions Periodicity of technical inspections Technical inspection Inspection requirements...

Informal document No. 2

Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 79 (steering equipment) Requirements applicable to ACSF of Category C1

18th ICTCT Workshop, Helsinki, October Technical feasibility of safety related driving assistance systems

The road to self-driving vehicles Asta Zero symposium 18 October 2016

Informal document No. 1

Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF

«From human driving to automated driving"

Proposal for Amendment to UN Regulation No. 46 (Devices for indirect vision)

Legal Aspects of Active Safety Systems. Tom Gasser, Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen (BASt) interactive Final Event

WHITE PAPER Autonomous Driving A Bird s Eye View

Autofore. Study on the Future Options for Roadworthiness Enforcement in the European Union

The necessity of New Regulations for New Technologies regarding R79

Functional Safety Analysis of Automated Vehicle Lane Centering Control Systems. Volpe The National Transportation Systems Center

ECE/TRANS/180/Add.3/Amend.2

United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Transport Division

Economic and Social Council

Model Legislation for Autonomous Vehicles (2018)

Modifications to UN R131 AEBS for Heavy Vehicles

Driver Assistance & Autonomous Driving

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Intelligent transport systems Adaptive Cruise Control systems Performance requirements and test procedures

Collect similar information about disengagements and crashes.

THE WAY TO HIGHLY AUTOMATED DRIVING.

Vehicle: Risks and Measures. Co-funded by the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme of the European Union

ECE-R13 New proposal for Annex 23

Energy ITS: What We Learned and What We should Learn

Economic and Social Council

Automated Driving: The Technology and Implications for Insurance. Matthew Avery Director of Insurance Research

Economic and Social Council

Proposal for amendments to Regulation No.79 (Steering equipment)

Tips & Technology For Bosch business partners

UN Regulation (UNR) for Hydrogen Fuelled Vehicles of Categories L1, L2, L3, L4 and L5

EU-Mexico Free Trade Agreement EU TEXTUAL PROPOSAL

Economic and Social Council

Sec moves to amend H.F. No. 1555, the delete everything amendment. 1.2 (H1555DE3), as follows: 1.9 Page 79, after line 20, insert:

VOLKSWAGEN T-ROC OCTOBER ONWARDS NEW ZEALAND VARIANTS

NISSAN MICRA DECEMBER ONWARDS NEW ZEALAND VARIANTS WITH 0.9 LITRE ENGINE

Procedure for assessing the performance of Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) systems in front-to-rear collisions

AN ANALYSIS OF DRIVER S BEHAVIOR AT MERGING SECTION ON TOKYO METOPOLITAN EXPRESSWAY WITH THE VIEWPOINT OF MIXTURE AHS SYSTEM

Near-Term Automation Issues: Use Cases and Standards Needs

Model of deceleration lane length calculation based on quadratic

Economic and Social Council

ALFA ROMEO STELVIO MARCH ONWARDS 2.0L PETROL & 2.2L DIESEL VARIANTS

MERCEDES-BENZ X-CLASS APRIL ONWARDS ALL VARIANTS

Economic and Social Council

Special GRRF Session on

Commencement of Preventative and Safety Performance Assessment

Jurisdictional Guidelines for the Safe Testing and Deployment of Highly Automated Vehicles. Developed by the Autonomous Vehicles Working Group

VOLKSWAGEN POLO FEBRUARY ONWARDS ALL VARIANTS

E/ECE/324/Rev.1/Add.78/Rev.3 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.1/Add.78/Rev.3

AEB IWG 04. Industry Position Summary. Vehicle detection. Static target

Bitte decken Sie die schraffierte Fläche mit einem Bild ab. Please cover the shaded area with a picture. (24,4 x 7,6 cm)

FORD ENDURA DECEMBER ONWARDS ALL VARIANTS

Overview of Regulations for Autonomous Vehicles

Braking Performance Improvement Method for V2V Communication-Based Autonomous Emergency Braking at Intersections

FORD MUSTANG (FN) DECEMBER ONWARDS V8 & ECOBOOST FASTBACK (COUPE) VARIANTS

Proposal for amendments to Regulation No. 79

Automated Driving: The Technology and Implications for Insurance Brake Webinar 6 th December 2016

AEBS/LDWS General Safety Regulation. ACEA discussion paper. Paris, June Renzo Cicilloni. Director Safety

GOVERNMENT STATUS REPORT OF JAPAN

AdaptIVe: Automated driving applications and technologies for intelligent vehicles

DRAFT REPORT 2nd meeting of the Informal Working Group (IWG) on Advanced Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS) for light vehicles

Introductive discussion on ITS, Connectivity and Access to Data. Eurobike 31 st August 2017

WLTP Revision 1

Economic and Social Council

E/ECE/324/Rev.1/Add.38/Rev.2 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.1/Add.38/Rev.2

JANUARY ADVANCED DRIVER ASSISTANCE TECHNOLOGY NAMES AAA s recommendation for common naming of advanced safety systems. NewsRoom.AAA.

ITS and connected cars

Advanced emergency braking systems for commercial vehicles

Development and Future Outlook of Steering Systems

- Status Report - System Power Determination of Electrified (Light Duty) Vehicles. Subgroup Leader: Germany, Korea. EVE-17 meeting

AEB IWG 02. ISO Standard: FVCMS. I received the following explanation from the FVCMS author:

Automatic Driving Control for Passing through Intersection by use of Feature of Electric Vehicle

EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, EMERGING ISSUES

Transcription:

Submitted by Japan Document No. ITS/AD-05-04 (5th ITS/AD, 24 June 2015, agenda item 3-2) Outline of Definition of Driving Technology

Background and Purpose Background Many of the existing definitions of automated driving include levels from manual driving through fully-automated driving; however, there is no uniform definition that is harmonised internationally. A common definition that can clearly distinguish s is needed in developing the regulation relating to automated driving at WP.29. For example, while SAE s definition is descriptive and technical, WP.29 needs to have a common definition that is normative and legal. Purpose To specify a definition of classification, as WP.29 s definition of automated driving technology, that would facilitate the development of vehicle regulations. Tasks In order for automated driving technology to develop properly and smoothly, it is necessary to clarify the devices, functions, performance, etc. of vehicles that use such technology. It is also necessary to clearly distinguish between those functions that can be realised with the vehicle alone and those that can be achieved with support from the road side or infrastructure.

How to Discuss the Definition of Driving Technology 1. Discussion to be based on SAE s definition The initial discussion will be based on SAE s definition, whose technical description is most detailed among the existing definitions presented at the first meeting of IG- ITS/AD. 2. Possible and specific s (use cases) to be listed To discuss the necessary definition while visualising the regulation to be developed in the future, possible and specific s will be identified with cooperation from the auto industry, and be compared against SAE s definition. 3. Systems to be re-categorised based on the relation with the driver Systems will be re-categorised from standpoints including the presence/absence of operation/monitoring by the driver, the attribution of responsibility and the relation with the Vienna Convention and the Geneva Convention. In particular, discussion will be focused on those s corresponding to SAE s Levels 2 and 3, in view of the phased regulatory process in the future, and they will be classified into sub-categories as necessary. 4. Definition to be developed in view of the vehicle regulation With the categories re-organised above, automated driving technology will be defined in view of the vehicle regulation, based on the performance, functions, etc. that are required in common by s in each category.

(Reference) Philosophy of Driving System Longitudinal direction control Issues of longitudinal direction control Keeping an adequate distance to the forward vehicle Avoiding traffic confusion by longitudinal direction control High level assistance (System activates in ordinary driving) ACC C-ACC Restrictions on current UN regulations Activation of braking signal when deceleration exceeds 0.7m/s 2 General issues Shall provide a warning that the driver is no longer in primary control. Shall provide a warning that the is limited or has failed. Shall Must ensure safety to avoid hacking. driving over-taking System controls the vehicle based on the detection of all directions driving at junctions Braking control Deadman s Stopping at the road side ACC System controls the vehicle based on the detection of forward direction System controls the vehicle based on the detection of all directions LKAS+ACC lane-change PAS parking Low level assistance (System does not activate in ordinary driving) Cruise Control AEBS BAS ABS System does not monitor the surrounding area System activates when the vehicle collides with the forward vehicle EVSC ESC System improves the primary driving function (System does not detect obstacles) Active steering AEBS with steering control System controls the vehicle based on the monitoring of lateral direction Collision avoidance System controls the vehicle based on the detection of longitudinal and lateral directions Lateral direction control A high-accuracy that can monitor the surrounding area and judge the traffic situation is necessary System controls the vehicle based on the detection of lane marking LKAS LKAS Vehicle controls the steering function E-LKAS Issues of lateral direction control Ensuring safe transition when control switches from automatically commanded steering to manual steering Avoiding traffic confusion by lateral direction control Parking assist High level assistance (System activates in ordinary driving) Restrictions on current UN regulations Less than 10km/h in case of ACSF (R79)

SAE Level How to Proceed (Examples) Use case Relevant devices Control Environment monitoring Responsibility Vienna and Geneva Conventions 0 D D D Compliance 1 D D D Compliance 2 D D D? 3 D?/S? D?/S? D?/S?? 4 S S S? 5 S S S? D: Driver S: System 1. Devices, functions and performance required for automated driving technology to be listed (tables similar to the above table to be created) 2. Representative use cases and issues for each item to be identified 3. Situations that cannot be dealt with by existing technology/devices to be addressed: Devices that ensure safety in emergency situations (e.g., deadman s ) Devices that check the device s conditions of use (e.g., driver monitoring ) Devices to record the s performance in the event of an accident (e.g., OBD, EDR) 4. With all of the above ready, the minimum requirements necessary for automated driving technology are to be proposed