Solid Waste Collection and Transport

Similar documents
Transfer. CE 431: Solid Waste Management

Executive Summary. Solid Waste Management Program Analysis and Recommendations for Silver City, New Mexico

Performance and Cost Data. residential refuse collection

Solid Waste Management

The Next Collection Contract

Information Meeting Transfer Station Options. September 30, 2014

CHAPTER 7 HEALTH & SANITATION ARTICLE 3 - REFUSE - GENERAL PROVISIONS. Section Equipment for hauling refuse and yard waste - secured loads.

2014 Efficiency of Automated Collection and Performance of Compressed Natural Gas Vehicles CIF Project No

2016 Waste and Recycling Program Frequently Asked Questions

TITLE 17 REFUSE AND TRASH DISPOSAL CHAPTER 1 MUNICIPAL COLLECTION SYSTEM

CHAPTER 50: GARBAGE GENERAL PROVISIONS

Control 1 Containers

Equipment options and considerations. By Roger Guzowski For "Equipment for Efficient Recycling Operations CURC webinar April 7, 2011

APPENDIX I LIST OF WARD-WISE HOUSEHOLD AND POPULATION IN MYSORE CITY CORPORATION, Page 213

Chapter 3-1 GARBAGE STORAGE AND COLLECTION

International Journal of Advanced Engineering and Management Research Vol. 1 Issue 1, 2016

Utility Rates October 1, 2018

Truck to disposal Storage to truck house to house

PUBLIC WORKS OF THE MANAGER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, CITY & COUNTY OF DENVER

MADURAI CORPORATION. The various sources of waste generation in Madurai are detailed below: Source of Solid Waste Generation. Quantity Tones per day

RESIDENTIAL WASTE HAULING: Arvada s Existing System & Early Research. September 8, 2010 Presentation to Arvada Citizens Task Force

Georgetown County Code of Ordinances Chapter 8 ARTICLE II. - SOLID WASTE. Sec Definitions.

RJ-250SC. Self-Contained Compactor. Great for waste with high liquid content. Qwik Clean Tank. Full door seal with P-Seal

WASTE MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES FOR BUILDING PLAN SUBMISSION

Illegal Dumping at Tribal Churches and Longhouses

Utility Rates April 1, 2019

CHAPTER 16 GARBAGE ARTICLE I - GENERAL REGULATIONS DEFINITIONS. As used in this Code, the following definitions shall apply:

Curbside Collections. Services and Pricing

Solid Waste Service Company Review and Collection Space Standards

AUTOMATED COLLECTION Frequently Asked Questions

Automated Garbage Collection ANSWERS TO FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS:

CHAPTER X. COLLECTION, DISPOSAL AND RECYCLING OF SOLID WASTE

City of Onalaska Automated Collection of Recycling and Trash FAQs

TRANSFER STATIONS IN THE 21 ST CENTURY. I.D. Rowden, MWH New Zealand Limited, Palmerston North

SOAH DOCKET NO TCEQ DOCKET NO MSW

Refer to the franchised waste hauler for further assistance with capacity needs and container sizes:

S A. Separation of Refuse Collection and Transportation. Transpirations Facility. Environment Retain Facility. Others Facility

Public Transportation Problems and Solutions in the Historical Center of Quito

Chapter 230 SOLID WASTE. Section Definitions.

RATES FOR REFUSE COLLECTION SERVICE L3 (San Leandro) Area (Effective September 1, 2016)

Sanitation Services Proposed FY11 Budget. Council Briefing

TRANSFER STATION OPERATING PLAN TOWN OF NORTH KINGSTOWN (Revised June 2016)

WASTE MANAGEMENT - MILINGIMBI

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE. SECTION 1: Refuse/Garbage and Recycling Fees (C of O Sec )

Chapter 18 - REGULATIONS OF SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL, TRANSPORTATION AND STORAGE ON PUBLIC AND PRIVATE LANDS

EXTRA REFUSE VOLUME CHARGES* Each additional container equivalent to a 48 gallon cart or smaller $4.88

SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLING ENCLOSURE STANDARDS

Sanitation Services Proposed FY11 Budget. Council Briefing

MASTER FEE SCHEDULE. $50 initial minimum charge plus $20 per hour if minimum is exceeded COMMERCIAL RATES. Once per week collection

ARTICLE X OFF-STREET AUTOMOBILE PARKING AND LOADING AND UNLOADING SPACES

Municipal Services Statement Rate and Fee Information

CHAPTER 19 SOLID WASTE

City Transfer Stations: Loading Services and Fees

Washington County Solid Waste & Recycling Garbage and Recycling Collection Services and Rates for Unincorporated Washington County

Table of Contents. The Waste Audit. Methodologies A. Weight-based Assessments B. Volume-based Assessments C. Considering Costs

ORDINANCE NO

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS DIRECTOR S OFFICE GENERAL INDUSTRY SAFETY STANDARDS

BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS

Town of Londonderry Rev. 1-Aug. 18, 1998, April 1, 2002, 01/21/08, 06/22/09, Title IV - Public Health, Safety and Welfare Ordinance /06/13

CITY OF TEA ORDINANCE 221

The following gate fees will be applicable at El Sobrante, Badlands, Lamb Canyon, and Blythe Landfills WASTE GROUP DESCRIPTIONS

Special Specification 7010 Debris Removal and Disposal

Technical Specification - 15 m3 Compactor

Analysis of Waste & Recyclable Materials Collection Arrangements. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Presented by Jeff Schneider

FY Virginia Beach Budget Response to Council Questions

The Town of Oliver is implementing a cart program for the same reasons as the industry service providers as well as a few other reasons including:

ON-STREET MOBILE FOOD TRUCK LICENSE

AUTOMATED TRASH COLLECTION

ORDINANCE NO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OTHELLO, WASHINGTON DOES ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:

Within the incorporated limits of the City of Palo Alto and on land owned or leased by the City. Monthly Refuse Collection Cost

Resolution No RECYCLING AND WASTE ENCLOSURE STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES

ATHENS SERVICES - INITIAL MAXIMUM RATES

SOLID WASTE SERVICES. City Council Budget Workshop August 2012

READYMIXPRO SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION

Chapter 107 GARBAGE, RUBBISH, REFUSE AND RECYCLABLES. ARTICLE I General Regulations Unacceptable Garbage, Rubbish, Refuse and Recyclables.

OFF-STREET MOBILE FOOD TRUCK LICENSE

RESOLUTION NO. R A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE CITY OF LAURINBURG SOLID WASTE POLICY (R )

Section 5: Food waste collection vehicles

Waste collection and transfer Thessaloniki - Greece

INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM

Republic Services All-In-One Recycling

MEMORANDUM. TO: Common Council-City of Madison, WI. FROM: Greg Galica and Ken Hallam (District 10 Residents) DATE: 06/15/2010

EXHIBIT 2A RESIDENTIAL SERVICES

Questions and Answers to Request for Proposal

Dickinson. Regulations, Policies, & Procedures

Strategies for Bulky Waste Collection in the City of Milwaukee

Trash and Waste Pickup Services Sample Proposal

Chapter 13 - LICENSES, PERMITS AND MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS REGULATIONS

Director of Public Works. Administrative Assistant I

Big Easy RV & Boat Storage A Green Energy Project Jana Lane Wildomar, California

CITY OF KAMLOOPS BYLAW NO A BYLAW TO AMEND SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLABLES BYLAW NO , 2011

SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE FOR THE TOWN OF HUDSON, MAINE

n Administrator's Si nature~

Program Guide: Medford Residential Recycling and Trash Program

AMENDED SOLID WASTE COLLECTION RATE SCHEDULE ANNUAL CPI ADJUSTMENT - SPECIAL RATE INCREASE EFFECTIVE JUNE 1, 2018

CR&R Rate Schedule for the City of Laguna Hills Effective October 1, 2017.xlsx. Residential Service

MECKLENBURG COUNTY SOLID WASTE FEE ORDINANCE

MECKLENBURG COUNTY SOLID WASTE FEE ORDINANCE

Assessment the Need of Al Kut City for Solid Waste Transfer Station

December 7, Dear Resident:

Transcription:

Solid Waste Collection and Transport 1. On-site Handling, On-site Storage : Curb Collection, Direct haul, transfer station 2. Collection services: types and methods 3. Vehicle and labor requirements 4. Types of Collection systems (hauled container system, stationary container system)

ON-SITE HANDLING: - Activities associated with the handling of SW until they are placed in the containers used for storage before collection ON-SITE STORAGE: Factors considered: 1. Types of containers used 2. Container Locations 3. Public health 4. Aesthetics 5. Methods of Collection

Factors considered: i) Types of Containers: - Depend on: - characteristics of SW collected E.g. Large storage containers (Domestic SW: flats/apartment) Containers at curbs Large containers on a roller (Commercial/Industrial) Collection frequency Space available for the placement of containers( Refer to Table 11-4) - Residential; refuse bags (7-10 litres) - Rubbish bins - 20-30 litres - Large mechanical containers - more commonly used to cut costs (reduce labor, time, & collection costs) - must be standardized to suit collection equipment.

ii) Container Locations: - side/rear of house - alleys - special enclosures (apartment/condos) - Basement (apts. in foreign countries)/ newer complexes iii) Public Health: - relates to on-time collection to avoid the spread of diseases by vectors, etc. iv) Aesthetics: - must be pleasing to the eye (containers must be clean, shielded from public s view).

v) Collection of SW - 60-80 percent of total SWM costs. - Malaysia (other developing nations) - labor and capital intensive. - Major problems: Poor building layouts - e.g. squatters Road congestion - time cost, leachate, transport costs. Physical infrastructure Old containers used (leaky/ damaged) Absence of systematic methods (especially at apartments, markets with large wst. volume).

Collection of SW(cont.) Collections were made by: 1. Municipal/ District Council 2. Private firm under contract to municipal 3. Private firm contract with private residents After Privatization (1998) - A Consortium of mngt. companies were given the responsibility. (e.g. SWM (The Southern Waste Management - handles southern region) took over the mngt. from MBJB/MPJBT; Alam Flora (Central Region).

TYPES OF COLLECTION: 1. Municipal Collection Services: a. Residential: i. Curb (Kerb-side), alley, and backyard collection (100-120 litres) Quickest/ economical Crew: 1 driver + 1 or 2 collectors No need to enter property Most common in Malaysia.

TYPES OF COLLECTION (Cont.) ii. Set-out, set back: - Collectors have to enter property - Set out crew carries full containers from resident storage location to curb/ alley before collection vehicle arrives. - Collection crew load their refuse into vehicle - Set-back crew return the container to storage area. iii. House-to-house collection where refuse bags used in 20-30 liter bins.

iii. High-rise apartment or flats, specially designed chutes or a communal storage or roll-on-roll-offs (RORO s). iv. Future trend: mechanically-equipped trucks. b) Commercial-Industrial Collection Services ( > 12 m 3 ) i. Large movable and stationary containers ii. Large stationary compactors (to form bales)

Collection Frequency: - residential areas : everyday/ once in 2 days - communal/ commercial : daily - food waste - max. period should not exceed : the normal time for the accumulation of waste to fill a container the time for fresh garbage to putrefy and emit fouls odor the length of fly-breeding cycle ( < 7 days).

TYPES OF COLLECTION SYSTEMS: 1. Hauled Container System (HCS) 2. Stationary Container System (SCS) 1. HCS: - Container is hauled to disposal sites, emptied, and returned to original location or some other location - Suitable for areas w/ higher wst. generation - Types:» Hoist truck : 2-10 m 3» Tilt frame container: 10-40 m 3 -» Trash trailer - for heavy, bulky rubbish (construction, commercial, usually open top container);» 2 crew per vehicle.

TYPES OF COLLECTION SYSTEMS (Cont.) 2. SCS: - the container used to store waste remain at the point of generation; except when moved to curb or other location to be emptied. - Types include: - Mechanically-loaded system - Manually-loaded collection vehicle(more common). - Used for residential/commercial sites. - Vehicle w/ internal compaction mechanism or uncompacted (open top lorry - side loaded. - Refer to Figure: 11-10 (handout).

PRIVATIZATION OF SWM: Specific tasks of the company included the following: To take over the collection and disposal of solid waste and cleaning activities of MPJBT To employ the staff of MPJBT involved in both activities To take over property involved with both activities To take over contracts currently held by the Council.

SWM - strategies to improve : increasing number of vehicles and staff rearranging work areas to increase productivity opening up new tenders for newer development areas repairing vehicles upgrading drainage-cleaning performance, collection of illegal dumping sites, and opening up new cells at Ulu Tiram landfill site (Southern Waste Management, 1998).

COST ACCOUNTING FOR SW COLLECTION SYSTEM: - Part of management control - Accounting concepts must be utilized to the maximum. - Referred to as an Enterprise Fund Accounting.

Costs in SW Collection Systems: i. Capital Costs (i.e. depreciation (susut nilai) costs for vehicles, garages, administrative services). ii. Interest costs of debt (to acquire /construct facilities/equip.) iii. Costs (i.e., labor, parts, oil, tires) of repairing and maintaining facil./equip.). iv. Employee benefits (pension, etc.). v. Cost of temporary employees (shortterm needs).

Costs in SW Collection Systems(Cont.): vi. Overhead costs (executives, supporting staff). vii. Costs associated with budgeting, accounting, and report activities. viii. Costs associated with billing and collecting user charges. ix. Liability and damage claims. x. Insurance premiums (personnel, facilities, and equipments).

TRANSPORT COSTS: - estimates of the costs per km and per hour to move the waste after collection from the end of collection route to the various facility locations in the study. - Unit transport cost (RM/km) for various types of vehicles : i. Collection vehicle ii. Transfer vehicles iii. Residue and/or ash vehicles - Labor costs (driver + crew in RM/hr unit cost) only for (i) and (iii). - For (ii) - labor costs should be included as part of the annual labor cost of the transfer station.

Factors Affecting SW Collection Productivity: a. Service Level Related: collection point, frequency, waste material b. Route related: Containers, Distance, constraints, topography, delays, road conditions c. Collection Methodology Related/Climate Related: Crew size, collection procedures, wind, rain.

ANALYSIS OF COLLECTION SYSTEMS - Must be optimized to save collection time and costs. - Important to determine vehicle and labor requirements - Activities involved 4 units: pick-up, haul, at-site and off-route.

Waste Collection Models Determination of Vehicle and Labor Requirements.

LAY-OUT OF ROUTES: 4-Step Process 1. Prepare location maps: - with pick-up point locations - number of containers - collection frequency - estimated quantities (in the case of SCS with self-loading compactors).

2. Data summaries: - Estimate of wst. each day (from pick-up locations) - ( for SCS - number of locations for each pickup cycle). 3. Lay preliminary collection routes (from different stations). - Route should connect all pick-up locations + last location be nearest to disposal site). 4. Develop balanced route - determine haul distance for each route - Determine labor requirements per day, check against available work times per day - draw master map.

SOLID WASTE COLLECTION: Selecting Collection Equipment: - Changing needs and advances in technology - Trends - increase use of computer-aided equipment and electronic control (e.g. on-board computers for monitoring truck performance and collection performance). - Most prevalent: compactor trucks (equipped with hydraulically powered rams that can compact wastes to increase payload). - Open and close non-compacting trucks: o Inexpensive to purchase or maintain o Inefficient for most collection application (small amt. of waste, have to lift high to dump into the truck) o Suitable for yard, bulky wastes, and recyclable materials, for small communities and rural areas.

Factors to consider in selection of vehicle: 1. Waste quantities 2. Truck body or container capacity a. Regulations regarding truck size and weight, b. To maximize the amount of wastes that can be collected while remaining within legal weights for the overall vehicle. 3. Consult with collection crew and drivers. 4. Loading location/ Location of container - determine the type of vehicles to be used: Front-loading; Sideloading or rear-loading compactor truck. 5. Physical characteristics of the collection routes/ road width - e.g. wide street - use side-loading automatic collection system; for narrow urban streets - use rear loaders.

Factors to consider in selection of vehicle(cont.): 6. Residential, commercial or industrial: HCS for large buildings (e.g. apt., industries,etc.) 7. Safety and comfort - to minimize danger to crews. Truck turning radius - be as short as possible. Water tightness - to prevent leakages. Speed - wide range of speed.

TRANSFER OF MUNICIPAL WASTE: - More common as the distance of landfill sites becomes greater - Most common in larger metropolitan areas. - Variance in types, size, and degree of sophistication - E.g. open-air stations or enclosed in a building (newer stations).

Advantages of Transfer stations: - better haul roads for collection vehicles (usually paved - reducing damages to trucks and delay). - greater traffic control (avoid traffic jams/congestion or litter + safety to children). - fewer truck on the sanitary landfill haul routes( reduction ratio of from 3 (trucks) :1 (transfer haul) or 5:1). - improved landfill operating efficiency (fewer trucks mean better traffic control). - Lower overall haul cost (reduction in no. of drivers/crew).

Criteria for Transfer Location: - Near the collection area served (to minimize collection crew time for haul to the transfer station). - Accessible to major haul routes (public acceptance and economics - lower transfer haul cost)). - Adequate land area to provide isolation (to handle traffic flow). - Suitable Zoning (commercial or industrial) - Served by utilities (water, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, electricity) ( Size vs. station capacity)

Station Concepts 1. Pit a) Direct Dump b) Compaction 1. Pit: Collection vehicles unloaded wastes into a large pit. Wastes are then pushed to an open-top transfer trailer by a tractor. The pit - as storage during peak periods. Compaction of bulk items made by the tractor in the pit.

2. Direct Dump: collection vehicles dump directly into opentop transfer trailer Large hoppers direct the waste into the transfer trailers. Very large transfer trailers are used (due to minimal compaction). Efficient - no intermediate handling required (direct from vehicle to transfer trailer).

3. Compaction: i) Hopper type compaction station : waste drop by gravity into a compactor - packs the waste into the trailers. ii) Push pit compactor station: a large hydraulically operated blade moves the waste to the stationary packer - then packs the waste into the trailers.

Advantages & Disadvantages of Design Alternatives: Option Advantages Disadvantages 1. Tipping floor,open-top trailer Large tipping floor where collection vehicles unload Dozers organize and push waste into open-top trailers 2. Pit, Open-top Trailer Coll.Veh. unload directly into a large pit Tractor w/ dozer or l/filltype blade organizes the wst.& pushes loads into open-top transfer trailers Little site work inv. Low bldg. Cost Can separate recyclables Reduced transfer time (coll.veh. unload while loading & transfer operations still going on) Pit serves as a storage Efficient system for high volumes of wst. Can sep.recyclables Not as eff. as other syst. For large vol. of waste Requires 3-level facility (considerable amount of site work & capital investment

Option Advantages Disadvantages 3. Direct dump, open-top trailer Coll.veh. dump loads directly into open-top trailers via large hoppers Stationary or mobile clamshell equip. 1. Can be used to distribute the wst. in trailer 2. No intermediate handling of the wst. inv. 3. Increasing efficiency 4. Fac. shutdown rare 5. No complicated equip. inv. 1. May req. separate trailer-packing machines (in case of large uncompacted wst) 2. Req.additional tipping flr/storage space. 3. Coll.veh. not indep. of transfer vehicle loading).

Option Advantages Disadvantages 4. Hopper-type Compaction Wst. is gravity-fed via hopper into stationary compactors that compacts the wst before or while entering the trailer 1. Efficient for small capacity demand 2. If compactor fails, no alternative method of loading Trucks may line up waiting to unload because of limited hopper size.

Option Advantages Disadvantages 5. Push-pit Compaction Coll.veh. dump loads into large steel or concrete pits. Large hydraulic blade moves the wst. to compactor charging box. Compactor packs the wst. Into trailer. 1. Large compactor can usually handle all types of wst. + large bulky wst. 2. Pit acts storage area during peak arrival. 1. Large capital investment. 2. Facil. operations dep. on operation of the compactor.

Option Advantages Disadvantages 6. Stationary Compactor, roll-off container Low-vol. operations (e.g. rural drop-off centers). Refuse unloaded directly into container. Container may be equipped with compactor to handle lighter materials. 1. Bulky and large materials - create problem w. small compactor. 2. Operation dep. on functioning compactor

Option Advantages Disadvantag es 7. Track and topload. Tracked compactor followed by loading in opentop trailers. Efficient for larger facilities (> 300 t/d)

PROCESS OPTIONS AT TRANSFER STATIONS: - To prepare waste for transfer haul and subsequent disposal 1. Baling: - practiced in the US since 1960 s - reduces haul cost - a more controlled operation at the landfill - require lower cover material - density 2000-1500 lb/yd3 - may have wire ties or may not be tied. - Requires little or no separation of wastes.

2. Shredding: - Shredders are used. - Handles bulky wastes (furniture, tree limbs, etc.) - Transport - use enclosed transfer trailers. - Wastes have good compaction characteristics - requires small trailers.