CLRP. Performance Analysis of The Draft 2014 CLRP. Long-Range Transportation Plan For the National Capital Region

Similar documents
ITEM 9 Information October 19, Briefing on the Performance Analysis of the Draft 2016 CLRP Amendment

CO 2 Emissions from Cars, Trucks & Buses in the Metropolitan Washington Region

TPB CLRP Aspirations Scenario

ConnectGreaterWashington: Can the Region Grow Differently?

Transportation 2040: Plan Performance. Transportation Policy Board September 14, 2017

Is The Dulles Corridor Metrorail Project the answer?

Janice Fortunato Senior Director Business Partnerships

Transportation: On the Road to Cleaner Air Did you know?

Maryland Gets to Work

RTSP Phase II Update

WMATA CONNECTGREATERWASHINGTON

NEW YORK SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

METRO Orange Line BRT American Boulevard Station Options

San Francisco Transportation Plan Update

San Francisco Transportation Plan

Bi-County Transitway/ Bethesda Station Access Demand Analysis

Volume XXIII, Issue 3 October CLRP Amendment Awaits Final Approval The 2015 amendment to the region s Financially

Green Line Long-Term Investments

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Basic Project Information

UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference. October 18, 2010

QUALITY OF LIFE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT I O N S TAT I O N

3.1 Introduction Transportation Elements and Study Area Meeting the Need for the Project

HOT Lanes: Congestion Relief and Better Transit

UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference. October 18, 2010

UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference. October 18, 2010

Funding Scenario Descriptions & Performance

Facts and Figures. October 2006 List Release Special Edition BWC National Benefits and Related Facts October, 2006 (Previous Versions Obsolete)

V03. APTA Multimodal Operations Planning Workshop August Green Line LRT

Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration a Reality

A Transit Plan for the Future. Draft Network Plan

Chapter 7: Travel Demand Analysis. Chapter 8. Plan Scenarios. LaSalle Community Center. Image Credit: Town of LaSalle

Basic Project Information

Sales and Use Transportation Tax Implementation Plan

Executive Summary. Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Priority Corridor Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis October 13, 2009.

UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018

Transportation Demand Management Element

Performance Measure Summary - Washington DC-VA-MD. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Hillsborough County MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 October 17, 2007

Submission to Greater Cambridge City Deal

2030 Multimodal Transportation Study

DRAFT BUS TRANSFORMATION PROJECT

MPO Transit Study. Transit Concept for 2050 November 5, Transit Technologies

Road Map for Sustainable Transport Strategy for Colombo Metropolitan Region with Cleaner Air, through Experience

2 VALUE PROPOSITION VALUE PROPOSITION DEVELOPMENT

Reston Transportation Strategy July 9, 2018

Transit in Bay Area Blueprint

US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017

Metropolitan Council Budget Overview SFY

Metro Reimagined. Project Overview October 2017

PHILADELPHIA SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)

Travel Time Savings Memorandum

Streamlining the District s Nightlife Curbside Access. Managing High-Demand Curbside Passenger Loading Zones

Alternatives Analysis Findings Report

Perry City 1200 West Walking/ Biking Path Project Type Pedestrian/ Bike

THE WILSHIRE CORRIDOR: RAIL AND ITS ALTERNATIVES. Prepared By: Jacki Murdock Transportation and Environmental Planner

7 COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES

Economy. 38% of GDP in 1970; 33% of GDP in 1998 Most significant decline in Manufacturing 47% to 29%

Caltrain Downtown Extension Study Ridership Forecast Summary

Regional Inventory of Projects Planned High Capacity Surface Transit Improvements in the WMATA Service Area. DRAFT Project Summaries

CITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Region Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration

Jeff s House. Downtown Charlottesville. PEC Office

Needs and Community Characteristics

The City of Toronto s Transportation Strategy July 2007

AMTRAK ENVISIONS WORLD CLASS HIGH-SPEED RAIL Washington to Boston in about three hours at up to 220 mph (354 kph)

Transit Access to the National Harbor

Customer Services, Operations, and Safety Committee Board Information Item III-D May 13, 2010 Rail Fleet Plan

Getting Parking Right in Emerging Mixed Use Environments

The Screening and Selection of Regionally Significant Projects

Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

MetroExpress Improvements

Dulles Corridor Air Rights Study Investigation

I-35W Past, Present, and Future: METRO Orange Line

Presentation A Blue Slides 1-5.

KANSAS CITY STREETCAR

Art Griffith, Capital Projects Manager, ,

Subarea Study. Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project. Final Version 1. Washington County.

Back to the Future? Land Use, Mobility & Accessibility in Metropolitan China Day 23 C. Zegras. Contents

Kenosha-Racine-Milwaukee (KRM)

Stakeholders Advisory Working Groups (SAWGs) Traffic and Transit SAWG Meeting #7

RTID Travel Demand Modeling: Assumptions and Method of Analysis

Vehicle Miles Traveled in Massachusetts: Who is driving and where are they going?

CEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update

Your comments count!

The Community of Yesteryear

TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTS

Transit Access Study

Breakout Session. The Mobility Challenges of Our Growing & Sprawling Upstate

The USDOT Congestion Pricing Program: A New Era for Congestion Management

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

How to Create Exponential Decline in Car Use in Australian Cities. By Peter Newman, Jeff Kenworthy and Gary Glazebrook.

TEXAS CITY PARK & RIDE RIDERSHIP ANALYSIS

Unified Corridor Investment Study DRAFT Step 2 Scenario Analysis Report

I-26 Fixed Guideway Alternatives Analysis

Treasure Island Mobility Management Program

Performance Measure Summary - Large Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

Performance Measure Summary - Medium Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms

More persons in the cars? Status and potential for change in car occupancy rates in Norway

Transcription:

NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION TRANSPORTATION PLANNING BOARD Item 12 CLRP Financially Constrained Long-Range Transportation Plan For the National Capital Region 2014 Performance Analysis of The Draft 2014 CLRP Presentation to the Transportation Planning Board September 17, 2014

What is the Long-Range Transportation Plan (CLRP)?»» The CLRP identifies regionally significant transportation projects and programs that are planned between now and Over 500 Projects are included from simple highway landscaping projects to billion-dollar highway and transit projects (includes 7% more lane miles of roadway, and 15% more miles of transit rail) Funding for programs that aim to make the transportation system in Metropolitan Washington better and more efficient»» Some specific projects in the CLRP include: Metro s Silver Line and Columbia Pike Streetcar (in VA) The Purple Line and the Corridor Cities Transitway (in MD) The H. St. / Benning Rd. Streetcar (in DC) Approx. 1,200 new lane-miles of roadway including Express Toll lanes on I-95 in VA 25 improved highway interchanges Clrp Long-Range Transportation Plan For a complete listing of projects and programs in the CLRP, visit: http://www.mwcog.org/clrp/ 2

2014 CLRP Performance Summary (-) Population Employment Lane Miles All Trips Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) VMT per capita Share of Lane Miles Congested (AM Peak) +7% Transit Rail Miles +15% (Metro, MARC/VRE, Light Rail) -3% +20% +25% +24% +35% Transit Trips +32% Share of VMT on Congested Roadways (AM Peak) Changes in Land Use, Transportation Network, and Travel Demand - Truck Trips +22% +42% +63% 0% 20% 40% 60% % Change The region is forecast to be home to 25% more residents and 35% more jobs in. To accommodate growth, 7% more lane miles of roadway and 15% more transit rail miles are planned to be constructed. The total number of trips taken is expected to increase by 24%, while transit trips are expected to rise faster than overall trips. The overall amount of driving (VMT) is expected to grow by 20%. This slightly less than forecast population growth, which means that VMT per capita is expected to drop by 3%. The increase in demand on the roadways is forecast to out-pace the increase in supply, leading to a significant increase in congestion. 3

Growth in Activity Centers (-) Population 1,320,000 New People Jobs 1,134,000 New Jobs Outside of ACs 42% 58% Inside of ACs Outside of ACs 24% 76% Inside of ACs 5000 4000 15% 40% 4000 3000 3000 2000 50% 24% 2000 1000 1000 Households (in 1000s) Inside Centers Outside of Centers Inside Outside of Centers Centers Jobs (in 1000s) The majority of new jobs and population are forecast to be in housing and job centers referred to as Regional Activity Centers. Though the majority of the regional population will remain outside of Activity Centers in, population is forecast to increase at a faster rate inside Activity Centers over the next 25 years. The majority of jobs today are located in Activity Centers, and this trend will continue in the future. 6

Daily Travel - Mode Share (-) 40% 7% 40% 7% 17,000,000 Trips/Day 11% 21,000,000 Trips/Day 14% 42% 39% Single Driver HOV + Carpool Bus + Rail Transit Walk + Bicycle In, 4 million more trips are forecast to be taken everyday using all modes on the region s transportations system. By, the share of trips made by drivers of single-occupant vehicles are expected to drop by a few percentage points, while the share of carpool trips and non-motorized vehicle trips are expected to increase slightly. 7

Daily Travel - Trips by Mode (-) 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5000 trips in 1000 s 1,942 1,172 6,814 7,079 2,899 1,544 8,504 8,155 957,000 +49% From more trips 372,000 more trips 1,690,000 more trips 1,076,000 more trips Walk + Bicycle Transit HOV + Carpool Single Driver +32% From +25% From +15% From Although mode share is not forecast to change significantly, the number of trips taken using each mode will rise substantially. The number of single driver trips is expected to increase by 15%, which is slower than all other modes in the model, while carpooling is expected to increase by 25%. The transit system is forecast to accommodate 32% more trips, which is just over 370,000 new trips per day. And a nearly 1 million new non-motorzied trips are expected, which is a 49% increase from today. 8

Daily Travel - Mode Share by Core, Inner, & Outer suburbs Regional Core 30% 27% 19% 26% 26% 25% 18% 32% Total: 2,986 Total: 3,691 Single Driver HOV + Carpool Bus + Rail Transit 39% Walk + Bicycle Inner Suburbs 42% 42% 6% 10% Total: 9,263 39% 42% 7% 12% Total: 11,056 1% 7% Outer Suburbs trips in 1000 s 48% 45% 44% Total: 3,724 45% 2% 8% Total: 5,134 2000 4000 6000 8000 10,000 12,000 In the regional core, the share of single driver trips are expected to decrease in favor of more nonmotorized trips. In the inner suburbs the share of single driver trips are expected to drop slightly while of transit and non-motorized trips increases slightly. In the outer suburbs, the share of single driver trips are expected to go down while transit, carpool, and non-motorized trips are expected to increase slightly. 9

New Trips in Activity Centers (-) Share of New Trips Beginning in Activity Centers By Mode (-) 56% of all new SOV trips will begin in AC Share of New Trips Ending in Activity Centers By Mode (-) 67% of all new SOV trips will end in ACs Single Driver 2,267 Single Driver 2,267 52% of all new Carpool/HOV trips will begin in AC 64% of all new Carpool/HOV trips will end in ACs HOV + Carpool HOV + Carpool 69% of all new Transit trips will begin in AC 88% of all new Transit trips will end in ACs Transit Walk + Bicycle % of New Trips 68% of all new Walk/Bike trips will begin in AC 25% 50% 75% 100% Transit Walk + Bicycle % of New Trips 68% of all new Walk/Bike trips will end in ACs 25% 50% 75% 100% The majority of new trips on all modes are forecast to begin and end in Activity Centers, which are expected to be well served by transit and provide an environment that is friendly to walking and biking. Though 58% of the new population is expected in Activity Centers, 69% of new transit trips and 68% of new walk/bike trips are expected to begin in these places. Since these places are forecast to be well served by transit and have a variety of destinations to travel to, 88% of all new transit trips are expected to end in Activity Centers. 10

New Transit in Activity Centers (-) Activity Centers with High Capacity Transit : 53% : 66% Most of the new transit projects included in the 2014 CLRP will serve Regional Activity Centers throughout the region. In, 66% of Activity Centers are expected to be served by high capacity transit compared to 53% today. 11

Commute Travel - Mode Share (-) 11% 24% 13% 25% 3,500,000 Trips/Day 4% 4,500,000 Trips/Day 5% 61% 57% Single Driver HOV + Carpool Bus + Rail Transit Walk + Bicycle Population and job growth region-wide will lead to an increase of approximately 1 million new commute trips. Commute trips are expected to account for 20% of all travel, but 40% of all vehicle miles traveled. The share of work trips taken by single-occupant vehicles is expected to drop slightly, while carpool/hov, bus and rail transit, and non-motorized trips are expected to increase slightly. 12

Commute Travel - Trips by Mode (-) 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 trips in 1000 s 145 836 398 2,141 245 1,095 575 2,541 100,000 +69% From more trips 259,000 more trips 177,000 more trips 400,000 more trips Walk + Bicycle Transit HOV + Carpool Single Driver +31% From +44% From +19% From Although commute mode share is also not forecast to change significantly, the number of trips taken using each mode will rise. Single driver commute trips are expected to rise at the slowest rate (19%) of all modes modeled, followed by transit (31%), HOV/Carpool (44%), and walking/biking (69%). Though commute mode share is only expected to go up by one percentage point, regional transit systems will accommodate more than 250,000 additional commute trips per day. 13

Commute Travel - Mode Share by Core, Inner, & Outer Suburbs Regional Core Inner Suburbs 23% 5% 14% 24% 56% 5% Total: 618 54% 18% Total: 790 63% 11% Single Driver 23% HOV + Carpool 3% Total: 1,746 61% 11% 24% 4% Bus + Rail Transit Total: 2,140 39% Walk + Bicycle 6% 1% Outer Suburbs 79% 14% 72% Total: 691 18% 9% Total: 983 2% trips in 1000 s 5000 1000 1500 2000 In the regional core the share of single driver trips is forecast to drop in favor of more walk and bike trips. In the inner suburbs the share of single driver trips is expected to drop slightly in favor of higher shares of transit and non-motorized trips. And in the outer suburbs, the share of single driver trips is expected to go down while the shares of transit and carpool trips are expected to increase. The increase in transit mode share is forecast to be greatest in the outer suburbs. 14

Transit Congestion (2011-) Line 2011 Red Blue Orange/ Silver Yellow Green with 50% 8-car* with 100% 8-car Satisfactory (<100 people per car) Congested (100-120 people per car) Highly Congested (>120 people per car) *The 2014 CLRP assumes 50% 8-car trains in The Metrorail system will likely reach capacity on trips to and through the regional core, due to lack of funding for capacity enhancements. Without additional rail cars beyond those currently funded, 4 out of 5 lines entering the core will become congested by. 15

Unconstrained Transit (-) Number of Transit Work Trips in Constrained vs. Unconstrained Constrained Unconstrained 1,095 1,129 +34,000 Additional Trips trips in 1000 s 5000 1000 To address the lack of identified funding for 8-car trains and core capacity station improvements, Metrorail ridership to or through the core area was constrained to 2020 levels. When this constraint on Metrorail trips is lifted, there is an increase of 34,000 transit work trips in. This brings the commute mode share for transit up slightly. 16

Roadway Congestion (-) Share of AM Peak Hour Lane Miles that Are Congested by regional Core, Inner, and Outer Suburbs Regional Core Inner Suburbs Outer Suburbs Lanes Miles 15% of lane miles congested 22% 5% 12% 2,267 2,300 2,300 13% 19% +45% in share of lane miles that are congested 5,600 6,000 +131% 2000 4000 6000 8000 +63% 9,000 9,700 in share of lane miles that are congested in share of lane miles that are congested region-wide +51% 10000 in share of lane miles that are congested * Lane mile measure includes all facilities except local roads in both directions. * Roads are congested if Volume/Capacity>1.00 Overall, congested lane miles are a relatively small proportion of the total lane miles in the region both today and in. However, the total number of congested lane miles is forecast to go up in all 3 sub-areas with the greatest expected increase in the inner suburbs. The share of lane miles that are congested is also expected to increase in all sub-areas, but the highest rate of increase is expected in the outer suburbs. 17

Roadway Congestion (-) Share of AM Peak Hour Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) on Congested Roadways by regional Core, Inner, and Outer Suburbs Regional Core Inner Suburbs Outer Suburbs 30% of vehicle miles travelled that are congested 1,140 38% 16% 1,263 30% +29% 26% 2,473 in share of VMT on congested roadways 35% 3,302 +90% 5,758 +42% in share of VMT on congested roadways +33% 6,806 in share of VMT on congested roadways region-wide in share of VMT on congested roadways * AM peak period VMT converted to AM peak hour * Roads are congested if Volume/Capacity>1.00 Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) in 1000s 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 Though a relatively small share of lane miles are currently congested, a higher share of Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) is currently on congested roadways. This indicates that the roadways that are congested are some of the more heavily traveled in the region. In, VMT on congested roadways is expected to increase in each sub-area as well as the share of VMT on congested roadways. 18

Accessibility to Jobs What is Job Accessibility? Location of Jobs + Travel Time (by auto or transit) Accessibility = [Number of Jobs Within 45 Minute Commute] Jobs are considered to be accessible if they are within a Jobs are considered to be accessible if they are within a 45 minute commute range 19

Accessibility to Jobs (-) By Automobile Frederick (in 1000s) : 70 40 The average number of jobs accessible within a 45 minute automobile commute is expected to go up slightly. The greatest reductions in job accessibility are expected to be on the eastern side of the region, due to increases in congestion system-wide and a higher concentration of future jobs on the west side. Average number of Jobs Accessible ( 1%) MARYLAND : 907 899 340 15 270 Loudoun VIRGINIA Montgomery 1 15 29 95 495 DC 50 50 29 Change in # of Jobs within 45 Minutes Significant Loss <-300,000 301 50 29 95 Moderate Loss -300,000 to -100,000 495 295 395 Fairfax 66 1 Prince George s Minimal Impact -100,000 to 100,000 Moderate Gain 100,000 to 300,000 Significant Gain > 300,000 Prince William 95 Major Highway Improvements New Road 301 Charles Widen / Improve Existing Road Add HOT Lanes (High Occupancy Toll) or HOV Lanes (High Occupancy Vehicle) Remove Existing Road Intersection Improvement 0 5 10 20 Miles N 20

Accessibility to Jobs (-) By Transit Frederick Average number of Jobs Accessible ( 27%) MARYLAND 70 40 (in 1000s) : : 507 400 Average accessibility by transit is forecast to increase, but will remain significantly lower than by automobile because transit does not reach all people or jobs in the region. 340 15 270 Loudoun VIRGINIA Montgomery 1 15 29 95 495 DC 50 50 29 Change in # of Jobs within 45 Minutes Significant Loss <-300,000 301 50 29 95 Moderate Loss -300,000 to -100,000 495 295 395 Fairfax 66 1 Prince George s Minimal Impact -100,000 to 100,000 Moderate Gain 100,000 to 300,000 Significant Gain > 300,000 Prince William 95 Major Transit Improvements 301 New Transit Charles Transit Improvement Add HOT Lanes (High Occupancy Toll) or HOV Lanes (High Occupancy Vehicle) New Transit Station 0 5 10 20 Miles N 21

Air Quality (-) The CLRP shows reductions in all main pollutants through 2020, with a very small uptick between 2030 and. Estimated emissions are within the approved budget for each pollutant through. 160 120 2009 Attainment Budget: 146.1 Tons/Day 132 103 Mobile Source NOx Emissions (1997 PM2.5 NAAQS, 15 mg/m3) 2010 Contingency Budget: 144.3 Tons/Day 70 60 50 40 59 50 Ozone Season VOC Emissions (1997 PM2.5 NAAQS, 15 mg/m3) 2009 Attainment Budget: 66.5 Tons/Day 40 37 40 80 66 60 61 30 20 40 10 Tons/Day 2017 2025 2030 Tons/Day 2017 2025 2030 22

Air Quality (-) PM2.5 Direct Emissions (1997 PM2.5 NAAQS, 15 mg/m3) Precursor NOx Emissions (1997 PM2.5 NAAQS, 15 mg/m3) 2,500 50 46.0 2,000 1,926 1,787 Tons/Day 40 36.0 41.7 Tons/Day 1,500 1,000 1,696 1,350 Tons/Day 1,279 1,255 1,299 30 20 23.5 27.4 Tons/Day 21.5 22.0 500 10 Tons/Year 2017 2025 2030 Tons/Year in 1000s 2017 2025 2030 23

Carbon Dioxide (2005-) 30 25 24.4 25.5 25.5 24.8 24.5 25.1 26.7 12 10 Total CO2 Emissions 20 8 15 10 5.1 4.9 4.8 4.3 4.1 4.0 4.0 6 4 CO2 Emission Per Capita 5 2 CO2 in 1,000,000s (Tons/ Year) CO2 Per Capita (Tons/Year) 2005 2012 *2020 2025 2030 * Year 2020 figures developed though interpolation between 2017 and 2025 Per capita CO2 emissions are forecast to decrease by 17% between and. Total CO2 emissions are forecast to increase by 5% between and, while the region will be accommodating 25% more people and a 35% more jobs. When the emissions reduction benefits from CAFE and TIER 3 standards are included in the analysis, total CO2 emissions and CO2 emissions per capita are expected to decrease over this time period. 24

Key Findings»» Daily auto trips to increase by 17%, truck trips by 22% and transit trips by 32%.»» VMT per capita to decline by about 3%.»» More than half the total population growth and three quarters of the employment growth to occur in 141 activity centers.»» Share of daily single driver trips to decrease by 3%, share of walking and biking to increase by 3%.»» Share of single driver commuting trips to decrease 4%, share by carpooling to increase by 2%, transit share increase by 1% and walk and bike share by 1%. 25

Key Findings (Cont d)»» Two-thirds of the activity centers to have high capacity transit service.»» State of Good Repair on region s highway and transit system achieved, but increased AM peak hour congestion on both systems.»» Accessibility to jobs to increase by 27% for transit, but only by 1% for autos.»» All air quality conformity requirements are met. 26