DRAFT. Kanata Mews Development 329 March Road, City of Ottawa. Transportation Brief. Prepared for:

Similar documents
Bennett Pit. Traffic Impact Study. J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado. March 3, 2017

830 Main Street Halifax Regional Municipality

Parking/Traffic Assessment Study

Ryan Coyne, PE City Engineer City of Rye 1051 Boston Post Road Rye, NY Boston Post Road Realignment and Roundabout Design Report

APPENDICES. No Cumulative Impact Project Alternative Traffic Analysis Memorandum (May 2016)

Proposed Pit Development

Re: Addendum No. 4 Transportation Overview 146 Mountshannon Drive Ottawa, Ontario

Half Moon Bay North Apartment Block Transportation Impact Assessment. Full Report. March 15, Prepared for: Mattamy Homes.

BARRHAVEN FELLOWSHIP CRC 3058 JOCKVALE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

MERIVALE PRIORITY SQUARE 2852 MERIVALE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: ONT Inc. 25 Winding Way Nepean, Ontario K2C 3H1

Traffic Impact Analysis Update

D & B COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

One Harbor Point Residential

886 March Road McDonald's Transportation Study

Lakeside Terrace Development

APPENDICES. APPENDIX D Synchro Level of Service Output Sheets

RICHMOND OAKS HEALTH CENTRE 6265 PERTH STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Guycoki (Eastern) Limited.

Traffic Impact Analysis

JOHNSON RANCH RAPID CITY, SOUTH DAKOTA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Weaver Road Senior Housing Traffic Impact Analysis

LOST LAKE CORRIDOR REVIEW

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado


June 21, Mr. Jeff Mark The Landhuis Company 212 North Wahsatch Avenue, Suite 301. Colorado Springs, CO 80903

Rockingham Ridge Plaza Commercial Development Halifax Regional Municipality

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017

Vanier Parkway and Presland Road Residential Development Transportation Impact Study

Traffic Impact Study Speedway Gas Station Redevelopment

Lacey Gateway Residential Phase 1

GASOLINE SERVICE STATION 1618, 1622 ROGER STEVENS DRIVE OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Prepared for:

FIRGROVE ELEMENTARY TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT

2405 Mer Bleue Orleans, (Ottawa), ON Community Transportation Study Mattamy Homes. Prepared By: Stantec Consulting Ltd. Version 2

RE: Taggart Retail Site Plan: Kanata West Proposal for Traffic Impact Study: Addendum #2

10 th Street Residences Development Traffic Impact Analysis

West Hills Shopping Centre Lowe s Expansion Traffic Impact Study

RE: A Traffic Impact Statement for a proposed development on Quinpool Road

LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS

King Street & Wyman Road Transportation Impact Study & Transportation Demand Management. Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited

DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY 1627 MAXIME STREET CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: Subhas Bhargava. July 9, Overview_1.

Clean Harbors Canada, Inc.

APPENDIX A LEVEL OF SERVICE CONCEPTS, ANALYSIS METHODOLOGIES,STANDARDS OF SIGNIFICANCE

Traffic Impact Analysis. Alliance Cole Avenue Residential Site Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.

Traffic Impact Analysis West Street Garden Plots Improvements and DuPage River Park Garden Plots Development Naperville, Illinois

105 Toronto Street South, Markdale Transportation Impact Study. Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited

Provide an overview of the development proposal including projected site traffic volumes;

Aldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering

King County Metro. Columbia Street Transit Priority Improvements Alternative Analysis. Downtown Southend Transit Study. May 2014.

Traffic Engineering Study

Oakbrook Village Plaza City of Laguna Hills

VOA Vista Drive Residential housing Development TIA Project #13915 TABLE OF CONTENTS

DIVISION STREET PLAT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Sweetwater Landing Traffic Impact Analysis

L1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY Prepared for:

IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS

APPENDIX C-2. Traffic Study Supplemental Analysis Memo

TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN REPORT KING OF PRUSSIA ROAD & RAIDER ROAD RADNOR TOWNSHIP PENNSYLVANIA

NEWCASTLE MIDDLE SCHOOL Traffic Impact Analysis

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION

MEMO VIA . Ms. Amy Roth DPS Director, City of Three Rivers. To:

FORT MYERS CITY COUNCIL OSCAR M. CORBIN, JR. CITY HALL, 2200 SECOND STREET FORT MYERS, FLORIDA

Re: Cyrville Road Car Dealership

Proposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center. Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

TRANSPORTATION REVIEW

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR ST. JOSEPH'S ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ADDITION

APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

KUM & GO 6400 WESTOWN PARKWAY WEST DES MOINES, IOWA 50266

Proposed Hotel and Restaurant Development

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY VICDOM BROCK ROAD PIT EXPANSION

RESPONSE TO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMMENTS

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Re: Residential Development - Ogilvie/Cummings Transportation Overview

To: File From: Adrian Soo, P. Eng. Markham, ON File: Date: August 18, 2015

Trafalgar Road & Lower Base Line Transportation Study Ontario Inc.

TRAFFIC DATA. Existing Derousse Ave./River Rd. AM LOS Analysis Existing Derousse Ave./River Rd. PM LOS Analysis

THE CORNERSTONE APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY R&M PROJECT NO

Aldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering

Traffic Feasibility Study

Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis Turtle Creek Boulevard Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.

Date: December 20, Project #:

TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY ALCONA SOUTH SECONDARY PLAN SLEEPING LION DEVELOPMENT TOWN OF INNISFIL

PROJECT: Wilkinson Road Corridor Improvement Traffic Management Planning Project SUBJECT: Traffic Analysis

Escondido Marriott Hotel and Mixed-Use Condominium Project TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT

Traffic Impact Study. Residences at Bancroft Block 14, Lot 2 Borough of Haddonfield, Camden County, New Jersey

Tijuana River Valley Regional Park Campground and Education Center

Traffic Impact Statement (TIS)

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

TIMBERVINE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY Prepared for:

December 5, Red Bank Planning Board Municipal Building 90 Monmouth Street Red Bank, NJ 07701

Table of Contents. Traffic Impact Analysis Capital One Building at Schilling Place

The Re:Queen and Sparks Traffic Brief - Addendum #2

STANDARD LIMITATIONS

CHAPTER 9: VEHICULAR ACCESS CONTROL Introduction and Goals Administration Standards

1354 Carling Avenue. Community Transportation Study/ Transportation Impact Study

RE: 67/71 Marquette Avenue Redevelopment Transportation Overview

Re: 233 Armstrong Street Residential Condominium Traffic Brief

Appendix C-5: Proposed Refinements Rail Operations and Maintenance Facility (ROMF) Traffic Impact Analysis. Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project

Traffic Impact Analysis 5742 BEACH BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT

Traffic Impact Analysis for 2171 Rosecrans Avenue

Transcription:

Kanata Mews Development Prepared for: Bascorp Management 1611 Ortona Avenue Ottawa, ON K2C 1W4 DRAFT Prepared by: McIntosh Perry Consulting Engineers Ltd. 115 Walgreen Road Carp, ON K0A 1L0 August 19, 2016 MPCE File No. CP-15-0465

Kanata Mews Development TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDICES...1 1.0 INTRODUCTION...2 2.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT...2 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS...4 3.1 Site Location... 4 3.2 Road Network... 4 3.3 Existing Traffic... 5 3.3.1 Existing Pedestrian, Bicycle and Other Non-Auto Modes of Traffic... 6 3.4 Capacity and Level of Service Methodology... 8 3.5 Existing Operating Conditions... 8 4.0 FUTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC CONDITIONS...9 4.1 Annual Background Traffic Growth... 9 4.2 Other Developments within the Study Area... 9 4.3 Future Background Operating Conditions... 10 4.3.1 4.3.2 Full Occupancy (2017)... 10 Full Occupancy + 5 years (2022)... 11 5.0 SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC... 12 5.1 Traffic Generation... 12 5.2 Traffic Distribution... 13 6.0 TOTAL FUTURE OPERATING CONDITIONS... 14 6.1 Full Occupancy (2017)... 14 6.2 Full Occupancy + 5 Years (2022)... 15 7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS... 16 APPENDICES APPENDIX A PROPOSED SITE PLAN APPENDIX B INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS 1

Kanata Mews Development 1.0 INTRODUCTION McIntosh Perry Consulting Engineers Ltd. (MPCE) was retained by the Bascorp Management to complete a transportation brief for a proposed 4,000 square foot commercial development to be located at 329 March Road (legal description being Lot 6, Concession 3) in the City of Ottawa. This investigation will outline the traffic related impacts that the proposed development will have on the abutting roadway system. The site has been analyzed for both the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours, as these time periods represent the peak conditions for traffic on the adjacent road network. The proposed development is located in the City of Ottawa, approximately 20 km south-west of the downtown core in the suburb of Kanata. See Figure 1 below for more information. 2.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Figure 1: Key Plan (Google) The subject site has a total area of approximately 1.7 hectares, upon which the developer plans to construct a new commercial building with a total gross-floor area of 4,102 square feet. See Figure 2 below the location of the subject area used for this study. 2

Kanata Mews Development Figure 2: Location Plan (geoottawa) The development is anticipated to consist of two or three separate units within the building, each occupied by a different tenant. From the preliminary site plan, it appears the owner wishes to divide the building into rental spaces: 2,006 square feet being used for a coffee shop and the remaining 2,096 square feet being used for up to two restaurant spaces. Based on the information available at the time of completing this investigation, full buildout and occupancy of the proposed development is planned for 2017. As such, a horizon year of 2022 (full occupancy + 5 years) will be used for this study, as by this time all new site generated traffic will be captured within the surrounding road network. The subject site will be serviced by the two existing all-directional accesses that currently connect to the existing road network via March Road to the north and Steacie Drive to the south. Further information can be found in the site plan (KWN Architects Inc., 2016/07/18) attached in Appendix A. For this report, the intersection of March Road and the North Site Access will be analyzed in detail, as this is the busiest intersection adjacent to the subject site. A majority of site generated traffic is anticipated to utilize this intersection; therefore it has been assumed that impacts to the intersection at Steacie Drive and Casson Way will be negligible. 3

Kanata Mews Development 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 3.1 Site Location The subject site is located within the community of Kanata in the City of Ottawa. The legal description of the site is Lot 6, Concession 3 in the Geographic Township of March, now the City of Ottawa, Ontario. The subject site is currently developed with two commercial buildings, each accommodating multiple commercial tenants. It is our understanding that the proposed development is to occupy the southeast corner of the existing site, currently occupied by an existing asphalt parking lot. The site is currently zoned General Mixed Use (GM) and surrounded primarily by existing Commercial/Mixed Use and Industrial developments, as well as Residential areas. There are two signalized intersections in close proximity to the subject site, specifically the intersection of March Road and Teron Road to the east of the north site access, and the shopping centre entrance off March Road to the west of the north site access. 3.2 Road Network The existing road network adjacent to the subject site is shown in Figure 2. The following describes the existing roads within the study area: March Road (also known as Ottawa Road 49) is a divided arterial roadway under the jurisdiction of the City of Ottawa. Presently, the posted speed limit is 80 km/h in the vicinity of the subject site. March Road runs in an East-West direction and has a four-lane urban cross-section. It should also be noted that March Road has a dedicated westbound left-turn lane for access to the existing north entrance of the subject site. Photo 1: March Road Looking Southeast at Existing Site Access (Google) 4

Kanata Mews Development Steacie Drive is an undivided collector road under the jurisdiction of the City of Ottawa. Presently, there is no posted speed limit in the vicinity of the subject site, therefore a speed limit of 50 km/h has been assumed as the road is within an urban area. Steacie Drive runs in an East-West direction and has a two-lane rural cross-section. Photo 2: Steacie Drive Looking Southeast at Existing Site Access (Google) 3.3 Existing Traffic In order to understand and fully appreciate the existing traffic volumes traveling through the study area, McIntosh Perry conducted a field visit during both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours on Tuesday August 9, 2016. In addition to observing the overall performance of the subject area, traffic volume information was collected in the form of 15-minute counts at the intersection of March Road and the North site access. The results indicate that the morning peak hour for the study area occurs between 8:00 and 9:00 am, while the afternoon peak hour occurs between 4:45 and 5:45 pm. The existing (2016) traffic volumes for the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours are presented in Figure 3. During the field investigations, traffic volumes were found to be steady in both directions. Volumes of heavy vehicle traffic were found to be negligible during the a.m. and p.m. periods, accounting for less than 1% of the total traffic volumes. For the purposes of this investigation, 2% heavy vehicle traffic has been assumed in order to maintain a conservative estimate of traffic volumes. 5

Site Access Site Access Kanata Mews Development AM PM N N 2063 1295 March Road 25 March Road 15 1125 1946 24 38 9 12 7 15 Figure 3: Existing Traffic Volumes (2016) 3.3.1 Existing Pedestrian, Bicycle and Other Non-Auto Modes of Traffic Moderate volumes of pedestrian and bicycle traffic were observed in the study area during the peak hour field investigations. March Road forms part of the City of Ottawa s active transportation network, providing dedicated on-road bicycle lanes in both directions. Additionally, sidewalks on both sides of March Road provide pedestrian access to the subject site as well as the surrounding area. The majority of on-foot pedestrian traffic observed during the peak hour field investigations was traveling to and from the existing OC Transpo bus stop adjacent to the site. There is currently an OC Transpo bus route along March Road in the area of the proposed development, with a stop located directly adjacent to the subject site and several others within walking distance. A portion of the OC Transpo System Map (effective as of June 2016) is presented in Figure 4. - Intentionally Left Blank - 6

Kanata Mews Development Figure 4: OC Transpo System Map Specifically, the OC Transpo bus stops in close proximity to the subject site include one located directly adjacent to the site access (Stop #7986) as well as one on the opposite side of the road (Stop #7984). These stops are serviced by Route 93 (Lincoln Fields & Lebreton Kanata North) and Express Route 60 (Mackenzie King Kanata). Route 93 provides regular service on weekdays in 10-30 minute intervals, while Express Route 60 operates in 20 minute intervals only at peak periods, providing service eastbound in the morning and westbound in the afternoon. The nearest Transitway service station is the Eagleson Station, located approximately 2.5 km south of the subject site, and includes Park & Ride Facilities. As the proposed development is expected to be a low level pedestrian traffic generator and the existing pedestrian and cycling infrastructure along March Road is well established in the area of the subject site, it is anticipated that active transportation will not be unduly impacted by the proposed development. In order to facilitate and further encourage active transportation in the area, it is recommended that the proposed development include bicycle parking and connectivity to the surrounding pedestrian network. 7

Kanata Mews Development 3.4 Capacity and Level of Service Methodology For definition purposes, the Level of Service (LOS) of an unsignalized intersection is determined by the overall volume to capacity (v/c) ratio. The v/c ratio for an intersection is defined as the sum of equivalent volumes for all critical movements divided by the sum of capacities for all critical movements (assuming that the v/c ratios for critical movements can be equalized). The City of Ottawa has established a criterion that directly relates the v/c ratio of an intersection to a Level of Service rating. Table 3.4.1 presents the Level of Service (LOS) categories for intersections, as defined by the Transportation Impact Assessment Guideline. A Level of Service of F has a Volume to Capacity (v/c) ratio greater than 1.00, which suggests demand exceeds the available capacity of the intersection. This is indicative of excessive delays and queuing. Table 3.4.1: LOS Definition for Intersections Level of Service (LOS) Volume to Capacity (v/c) Ratio A 0 to 0.60 B 0.61 to 0.70 C 0.71 to 0.80 D 0.81 to 0.90 E 0.91 to 1.00 F > 1.00 3.5 Existing Operating Conditions The existing traffic volumes collected during the field investigation portion of this study were analyzed using Synchro 8 software. Table 3.5.1 summarizes the 2016 existing traffic operations at the intersection of March Road and the site access in terms of Volume/Capacity (v/c) ratio, Level of Service (LOS) and overall delay. A detailed summary of the intersection capacity analysis can be found in Appendix B. Table 3.5.1: Existing Traffic Operation (2016) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection v/c Delay v/c Delay LOS LOS Ratio (sec) Ratio (sec) March Road / North Site Access North Left-Turn (Site Access) A 0.112 25.0 A 0.203 43.1 West Left-Turn (March Road) A 0.049 11.9 A 0.067 20.8 8

Kanata Mews Development Under existing traffic conditions, the unsignalized intersection of March Road and the north site access appears to be operating at an acceptable level of service during both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Total delay for turning movements are consistent with observations made in the field. Westbound through traffic is not impeded by traffic entering the site due to the presence of an existing leftturn lane on March Road. Similarly, right-in right-out traffic at the site access is not anticipated to affect eastbound through traffic. As such, performance of these movements is not included in the traffic operation summary table. 4.0 FUTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 4.1 Annual Background Traffic Growth The existing traffic volumes within the study area can be expected to grow over time due to the overall growth in the area. A study completed by the City of Ottawa has concluded that between 2016 and 2021, the population is expected to grow from 976,800 to 1,031,300 a total growth of 5.58%. This translates into an anticipated yearly growth rate of 1.12%. In a conservative approach, an annual growth rate of 1.5% has been applied to existing volumes in order to analyze traffic growth to the horizon years of 2017 and 2022. For the purposes of this analysis, the horizon year of 2017 as by this time the development is anticipated to have reached full occupancy. Similarly, the horizon year of 2022 (full occupancy + 5 years) will be analyzed as by this time all new traffic generated but the subject site is expected to be captured within the surrounding road network. 4.2 Other Developments within the Study Area At the time of preparing this brief, MPCE is aware of a proposed condominium development planned for construction approximately 0.3km east of the subject site on land municipally addressed as 1131 Teron Road. Although no site-plan was available at the time this report was prepared, it is our understanding that the development will consist of a nine-storey mid-rise apartment building to be serviced by a single all-directional access on Teron Road. MPCE reviewed the Transportation Impact Assessment Study for the proposed development, prepared by D.J. Halpenny and Associates Ltd. (March 27, 2012), and although the development is expected to contribute additional traffic within the study area, it is anticipated that the above noted background traffic growth factors have accounted for this type of development. 9

Site Access Site Access Kanata Mews Development 4.3 Future Background Operating Conditions 4.3.1 Full Occupancy (2017) The estimated future traffic growth rate (at 1.5% per year) was applied to the existing (2016) traffic volumes to produce the anticipated future 2017 background traffic volumes for the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The anticipated future 2022 background traffic volumes for both weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours are presented in Figure 5. AM PM N N 2094 1314 March Road 25 March Road 15 1142 1975 24 39 9 12 7 15 Figure 5: Future Background Traffic Volumes (2017) Table 4.3.1 summarizes the 2017 future background traffic operations at the intersection of March Road and the site access in terms of Volume/Capacity (v/c) ratio, Level of Service (LOS) and overall delay. A detailed summary of the intersection capacity analysis can be found in Appendix B. Table 4.3.1: Future Background Traffic Operation (2017) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection v/c Delay v/c Delay LOS LOS Ratio (sec) Ratio (sec) March Road / North Site Access North Left-Turn (Site Access) A 0.115 25.5 A 0.208 44.3 West Left-Turn (March Road) A 0.050 12.0 A 0.069 21.3 Under future background traffic conditions at the 2017 horizon year, the intersection of March Road and the north site access is expected to operate at an acceptable level of service during both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Impacts to the v/c and delays for the site access are inconsequential when compared to the existing (2016) operation of the intersection. 10

Site Access Site Access Kanata Mews Development 4.3.2 Full Occupancy + 5 years (2022) The estimated future traffic growth rate (at 1.5% per year) was applied to the existing (2016) traffic volumes to produce the anticipated future 2022 background traffic volumes for the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The anticipated future 2022 background traffic volumes for both weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours are presented in Figure 6. AM PM N N 2256 1416 March Road 27 March Road 16 1230 2128 26 42 10 13 8 16 Figure 5: Future Background Traffic Volumes (2022) Table 4.3.2 summarizes the 2022 future background traffic operations at the intersection of March Road and the site access in terms of Volume/Capacity (v/c) ratio, Level of Service (LOS) and overall delay. A detailed summary of the intersection capacity analysis can be found in Appendix B. Table 4.3.2: Future Background Traffic Operation (2022) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection v/c Delay v/c Delay LOS LOS Ratio (sec) Ratio (sec) March Road / North Site Access North Left-Turn (Site Access) A 0.144 29.1 A 0.281 58.2 West Left-Turn (March Road) A 0.059 12.7 A 0.086 24.4 Under future background traffic conditions at the 2022 horizon year, the intersection of March Road and the north site access is expected to operate at an acceptable level of service during both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Although there is an increase in the anticipated delay for the left-turn movements at the site access when compared to the existing (2016) conditions, a review of the v/c for the intersection indicates that the intersection can support additional traffic volumes without exceeding its capacity. 11

Kanata Mews Development 5.0 SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC 5.1 Traffic Generation As outlined in previous sections of this report, the proposed development is anticipated to consist of a new 4,102 square foot commercial building divided between a 2,006 square foot coffee shop and 2,096 square feet of restaurant space. Traffic volumes generated by the proposed development were estimated using the ITE Trip Generation Manual (9 th Edition). It should be noted that the lowest trip generation rates were assumed due to the proximity of other coffee shops and restaurants as well as the sub-urban nature of the study area. The ITE Trip Generation Manual rates generally include a 10% modal share, therefore it is anticipated that the volumes generated will be sufficient in estimating the proposed development s trip ends for the purposes of this investigation. Total automobile trip ends for the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours for the proposed development are summarized in Table 5.1.1. Table 5.1.1: Proposed Development Total Trip Generation Land Use Gross Floor Area Automobile Trips (ITE #) (ft 2 AM PM /1000) In Out In Out Coffee Shop (936) 2.006 56 53 25 36 Restaurant (933) 2.096 53 35 15 15 TOTAL 4.102 109 88 40 40 197 80 Traffic generated by the new development is anticipated to consist of both primary and pass-by trips. Primary trips are those for which the new development is the ultimate destination, and their presence on the adjacent road network is directly attributed to the new development. Contrarily, pass-by trips consist of traffic which is already present on the adjacent road network and access the site due to its convenient location. Pass-by trips do not add new traffic to the adjacent road network, as they are drawn from the passing traffic stream when entering the site. As such, pass-by trips are subtracted from the through-volumes passing the site access. Based on data collected from similar developments (ITE #934), it is estimated that approximately 49% of site generated traffic will be pass-by trips in the a.m. peak period, while 50% of traffic will be pass-by trips in the p.m. peak period. The total estimated primary and pass-by trip generation for the subject site are presented in Table 5.1.2. 12

Kanata Mews Development Table 5.1.2: Proposed Development Primary and Pass-By Trip Generation Land Use Automobile Trips Primary (Pass-By) AM PM (ITE #) In Out In Out Coffee Shop (936) 28 (28) 27 (26) 13 (13) 12 (12) Restaurant (933) 27 (26) 18 (17) 8 (8) 7 (7) TOTAL 55 (54) 45 (43) 21 (21) 19 (19) 100 (97) 40 (40) Trips that are attracted to the subject site from the traffic volumes on roadways in its vicinity but require a diversion from that roadway to gain access to the site are referred to as Diverted Linked trips. Similar to primary trips, diverted linked trips add traffic to streets adjacent to the site, however they may not add traffic to the area s major travel routes. Although this development is anticipated to generate a nominal amount diverted linked trips, it should be noted that these trips have been assumed to be primary trips due to the limited study area. 5.2 Traffic Distribution For the purposes of this investigation, the origin-destination distribution of the site generated traffic volumes by the proposed development has been estimated with consideration given to several factors, including existing traffic patterns and local population densities. Although a portion of the traffic traveling to and from the subject site is expected to utilize the south access at Steacie Drive, a majority of site generated traffic is expected to use the north access at March Road. In a conservative approach, is has been assumed that traffic generated by the new development will utilize the north access exclusively for the purposes of this investigation. This assumption has been made as the north site access is the busiest intersection adjacent to the subject site and therefore more susceptible to impacts associated with increased traffic volumes. The development traffic volumes projected for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours are presented in Figure 8. Note that negative volumes denote the subtraction of pass-by trips from through traffic passing the site. 13

Site Access Site Access Site Access Site Access Kanata Mews Development AM PM N N -28-6 March Road 56 March Road 11-26 -15 53 29 38 50 13 27 Figure 8: Projected Development Traffic 6.0 TOTAL FUTURE OPERATING CONDITIONS This section presents the analysis and summarizes the effects of adding the total subject site generated traffic volumes to the anticipated future network in the a.m. and p.m. peak hours for bit the 2017 and 2022 horizon years. 6.1 Full Occupancy (2017) The results of combining the subject site generated traffic volumes with the anticipated 2017 background traffic volumes for both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours are presented in Figure 9. AM PM N N 2066 1308 March Road 81 March Road 26 1116 1960 77 68 47 62 20 42 Figure 9: Total Traffic (2017) A summary of the 2017 total future traffic operations at the intersection of March Road and the site access in terms of Volume/Capacity (v/c) ratio, Level of Service (LOS) and overall delay is presented in Table 6.1.1. A detailed summary of the intersection capacity analysis can be found in Appendix B. 14

Site Access Site Access Kanata Mews Development Table 6.1.1: Total Future Traffic Operation (2017) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection v/c Delay v/c Delay LOS LOS Ratio (sec) Ratio (sec) March Road / North Site Access North Left-Turn (Site Access) B 0.677 60.4 B 0.602 76.9 West Left-Turn (March Road) A 0.167 13.2 A 0.121 22.5 Under anticipated future (2017) traffic conditions at full occupancy, the intersection of March Road and the north site access is expected to operate at an acceptable level of service during both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Delays are anticipated to increase when compared to operation under background traffic, however the existing left-turn lane on March Road at the site access is anticipated to moderate any impacts on westbound through traffic and therefore no modifications to the existing intersection are recommended. 6.2 Full Occupancy + 5 Years (2022) The results of combining the subject site generated traffic volumes with the anticipated 2017 background traffic volumes for both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours are presented in Figure 10. AM PM N N 2228 1410 March Road 83 March Road 27 1204 2113 79 71 48 63 21 43 Figure 10: Total Traffic (2022) A summary of the 2022 total future traffic operations at the intersection of March Road and the site access in terms of Volume/Capacity (v/c) ratio, Level of Service (LOS) and overall delay is presented in Table 6.2.1. A detailed summary of the intersection capacity analysis can be found in Appendix B. 15

Kanata Mews Development Table 6.2.1: Total Future Traffic Operation (2022) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection v/c Delay v/c Delay LOS LOS Ratio (sec) Ratio (sec) March Road / North Site Access North Left-Turn (Site Access) C 0.783 82.7 C 0.748 114.5 West Left-Turn (March Road) A 0.187 14.2 A 0.147 26.1 Under anticipated future (2022) traffic conditions, the intersection of March Road and the north site access is anticipated to operate at an acceptable level of service during both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Although the delay for the North left-turn onto March Road is anticipated to increase significantly when compared to existing conditions, the increase can be attributed to the increasing background traffic volumes. As such, the proposed development is expected to have a negligible impact on the intersection operation. No modifications to the existing intersection are recommended. 7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The subject site has a total area of approximately 1.7 hectares, upon which the developer plans to construct a new commercial building with a total gross-floor area of 4,102 square feet. From the preliminary site plan, it appears the owner wishes to divide the building into rental spaces: 2,006 square feet being used for a coffee shop and the remaining 2,096 square feet being used for up to two restaurant spaces. The subject site will be serviced by the two existing all-directional accesses that currently connect to the existing road network via March Road to the north and Steacie Drive and Casson Way to the south. The subject site is anticipated to generate 55 inbound, 45 outbound and 97 pass-by trips during the weekday a.m. peak hour, and 21 inbound, 19 outbound and 40 pass-by trips during the p.m. peak hour. For the purposes of this investigation, the intersection of March Road and the North Site Access was analyzed in detail, as this is the busiest intersection with the surrounding road network and therefore most likely to be impacted by increased traffic volumes. In a conservative approach, the intersection was analyzed under the assumption that all site generated traffic will be serviced by the north site access. The intersection at Steacie Drive and Casson Way is not anticipated to be effected by the proposed development. Intersection analysis was completed using Synchro 8 software for the following scenarios: 2016 Existing Conditions; 2017 Horizon Conditions Full build-out/occupancy (background and total traffic); and 2022 Horizon Conditions Full build-out/occupancy + 5 years (background and total traffic). Both a.m. and p.m. peak hours were analyzed for each of the above noted scenarios. 16

Kanata Mews Development The analysis results indicate that the intersection is anticipated to operate at acceptable levels of service during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours through the 2022 horizon year. Although the delay for the North leftturn onto March Road is anticipated to increase significantly when compared to existing conditions, the increase can be attributed to the increasing background traffic volumes and, as such, the proposed development is expected to have a negligible impact on the intersection operation. Additionally, the existing left turn lane on March Road at the site access is anticipated to diminish any impacts on through traffic, therefore no modifications to the existing intersection are recommended. Based on the intersection analysis completed as part of this investigation, McIntosh Perry concludes that the existing unsignalized intersection of March Road and the north site access will operate at acceptable levels of service during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours to the horizon year of 2022. Similarly, the proposed development is expected to be a low level pedestrian traffic generator and the existing pedestrian and cycling infrastructure along March Road is well established in the area of the subject site. As such, it is anticipated that active transportation will not be unduly impacted by the proposed development. Prepared by: Alex Siciliano, EIT 613-863-2184 ext. 2245 a.siciliano@mcintoshperry.com Submitted by: Thomas Gryz, M.A.Sc. P.Eng. 613-863-2184 ext. 2231 t.gryz@mcintoshperry.com 17

Kanata Mews Development Appendix A Proposed Site Plan 18

PROJECT ZONING REVIEW/STATISTICS NOTES: 1 LOCATION PLAN A100 SCALE N.T.S. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PART OF LOT 6, CONCESSION 3 GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF MARCH MUNICIPALITY: OTTAWA MUNICIPAL ADDRESS: 329 MARCH RD. REGISTERED OWNER: BASCORP MANAGEMENT LOT AREA = 17,490 sq. m (188,267 sq.ft.) (4.32 ACRES) ZONING ANALYSIS: OTTAWA ZONING BY-LAW: 2008-250 ZONE: GM[1720], H(14) PROPOSED USE: RESTAURANTS IN AN EXISTING SHOPPING CENTRE EXISTING BUILDING AREAS (SQ M.) (SQ FT.) NORTH BUILDING (No. 1) 2,464 26,527 SOUTH BUILDING (No. 2) 2,136 22,988 SUBTOTALS 4,600 49,515 PROPOSED BUILDING No. 3 380 4,102 TOTALS 4,980 53,617 RESTAURANT USES EXISTING: ROYAL OAK 372 4,000 LUNA 187 2,016 SUBWAY 167 1,800 SUBTOTAL 726 7,816 PROPOSED: 380 4,102 TOTALS 1,106 11,918 = 22% DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS REQUIRED PROVIDED MINIMUM LOT AREA MINIMUM LOT WIDTH MAXIMUM FLOOR SPACE INDEX MINIMUM REQUIRED YARD FRONT YARD INTERIOR SIDE YARD REAR YARD MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT MINIMUM WIDTH OF LANDSCAPING ABUTTING A STREET ALL OTHER CASES PARKING SPACES SHOPPING CENTRE @ 3.6 / 100 sq.m. LOADING SPACES (3.5 x 7) PARKING FOR PHYSICALLY DISABLED (BY-LAW 2003-530) NO MIN. NO MIN. 2 3m NO MIN. 3m (@ STREET) 14m 3.00m NO MIN. 179 2 2 17,490 sq. m 112.6m 0.29 3m 30.5m 49.1m 5.5m 3.00m 1.50m BIKE PARKING SPACES @ 1 / 1500 sq.m. 4 4 179 2 4 N42 59'25"W 27.67 PAVED WALKWAY 15230 13700 1500 CONCRETE SIDEWALK N42 33'30"E 4.85 FUTURE FUTURE RESTAURANT RESTAURANT 12.0 m 3000 97 SQ.M. (1048 SQ.FT.) 20 4800 97 SQ.M. (1048 SQ.FT.) EX. CONC. SIDEWALK 27640 8370 3710 3150 MARCH RD. 12780 16080 3250 NEW FH LINE OF LONG-TERM ROAD WIDENING 1200 27800 5200 CONC. CURBS ALL AROUND CONC. SLAB CONC. SIDEWALK 1200 BRIDGEHEAD EX. CB PROPOSED 6m FIRE ROUTE 186 SQ.M. (2006 SQ.FT.) 3660 LINE OF 3m FRONT YARD SETBACK LINE 1200 CURB RAMP N42 46'00"W 46.95 PLANTERS 12050 6000 EX. SIGN 11800 1220 CANOPY ABOVE PAVED WALKWAY SUN SHADE ABOVE PATIO 71.9m TO RESIDENTIAL ZONE ON OPPOSITE SIDE OF STEACIE DRIVE 12 3200 8 2m HIGH OPAQUE WOOD PRIVACY SCREEN 2m HIGH OPAQUE WOOD PRIVACY SCREEN 6700 EX. EDGE OF PAVEMENT 30450 5 5 5200 6700 5200 5200 6700 5200 B-PED; SEE SURVEY 2600 TYP. HYDRO TRANSFORMER EX. EDGE OF PAVEMENT CONC. SIDEWALK N11 43'15"W 10.62 N48 07'20"E 5.78 ROAD ALLOWANCE Contractor shall check and verify all dimensions on site and report any discrepancies to the Architect before proceeding. Registered Owner/ Project Manager: BASCORP MANAGEMENT Civil Engineer: McINTOSH PERRY CONSULTING ENGINEERING LTD. 115 WALGREEN RD. R.R.3 CARP, ONTARIO K0A 1L0 Tel: (613) 836-2184 Fax: (613) 836-3742 e-mail: c.melanson@mcintoshperry.com Geotechnical Engineer: 115 WALGREEN RD. R.R.3 CARP, ONTARIO K0A 1L0 Tel: (613) 836-2184 Fax: (613) 836-3742 e-mail: c.melanson@mcintoshperry.com Landscape Architect: JAMES B. LENNOX & ASSOCIATES INC. Surveyor: 1611 ORTONA AVE OTTAWA, ONTARIO K2C 1W4 Cell: (613) 276-3361 e-mail: tony.bascelli11@gmail.com McINTOSH PERRY CONSULTING ENGINEERING LTD. 1419 CARLING AVE. SUITE 200A OTTAWA, ONTARIO K1Z 7L6 Tel: (613) 722-5168 Fax: 1 (866) 343-3942 e-mail: jl@jbla.ca ANNIS O'SULLIVAN VOLLEBEKK LTD. 14 CONCOURSE GATE, SUITE 500 OTTAWA, ONTARIO K2E 7S6 Tel: (613) 727-0850 Fax: (613) 727-1079 e-mail: CITY OF OTTAWA PREPARED BY ANNIS, O'SULLIVAN, VOLLEBEKK ONTARIO LAND SURVEYORS MARCH 2, 2016 3 SITE PLAN A100 SCALE 1 : 300 0 1.5 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 METRES EX. CONC. SIDEWALK plot scale 1:1 N47 03'40"E 11.58 BPED & CPED; SEE SURVEY CB N22 44'20"W 45.61 EX. BUSH MH N42 58'40"W 108.61 N14 23'50"E 33.00 11 CB 5 10 8 EX. CONC. SIDEWALK EX. SIGN LUNA BUS BENCH EX. WOOD RETAINING WALL N47 01'20"E 0.30 BUS SHELTER 12.0 m EX. FH NEW CONC. SIDEWALK 17 PAINT LINES EX. 2-STOREY BRICK COMMERCIAL BUILDING EX. SIGN N42 58'40"W 9.00 8800 EX. 12.0 m 12.0 m N47 01'20"E 0.30 N42 58'40"W 21.87 13 ROYAL OAK EX. SIGN RELOCATE EX. STOP SIGN 'ROYAL OAK' PATIO 'ROYAL OAK' PATIO 9 MARCH RD. EX. BENCHES EX. HANDRAIL AROUND PATIO EX. CONC. SIDEWALK EX. FENCE 6100 EX. EX. CONC. SIDEWALK EX. INTERLOCK SIDEWALK R=433.44 A=33.37 C=33.36 N45 49'50"W 2 EX. CHAINLINK FENCE ENCLOSURE EX. 2-STOREY BRICK COMMERCIAL BUILDING EX. SIGN EX. 6m FIRE ROUTE EX. 4-BIKE RACK N42 33'30"E 4.85 N42 59'25"W 27.67 EX. SIGN PAINT LINES SUBWAY 9 8000 10 12.0 m 3000 20 EX. CONC. SIDEWALK LINE OF LONG-TERM ROAD WIDENING PROPOSED COMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT NEW FH 380 SQ.M. (4102 SQ.FT.) F.F.E = 87.15 27800 LINE OF 3m FRONT YARD SETBACK LINE CB 12050 PROPOSED 6m FIRE ROUTE EASEMENT PER INST. HM 3598 N42 46'00"W 46.95 EX. SIGN 11800 5200 10150 5200 PATIO 12 8 6700 47550 30650 30450 31500 5 5 B-PED; SEE SURVEY 6700 6700 N11 43'15"W 10.62 OHW OHW OHW HYDRO KIOSK N48 07'20"E 5.78 MH HYDRO TRANSFORMER EX. HEDGE EX. HEDGE LINE OF HYDRO EASEMENT MH EX. PINE GROVE CPED; SEE SURVEY N43 42'10"W 33.79 ROAD ALLOWANCE BETWEEN LOTS 5 AND 6 (CLOSED BY BY-LAW No. 39-75, INST. NS1504 OHW BELL EQUIPMENT N48 03'40"W 38.19 N88 02'10"W 10.91 no. revision date north detail no. sheet no. nord 1 A1 383 Parkdale Avenue, Suite 201 Ottawa Ontario Canada K1Y 4R4 KWC ARCHITECTS INC. PHONE FAX E MAIL (613) 238-2117 (613) 238-6595 kwc@kwc-arch.com détail no. feuille no. N14 23'50"E 43.47 MH 19 EX. CONC. PAD BPED; SEE SURVEY N75 36'10"W 10.95 EX. FH CB HYDRO KIOSK EASEMENT PER INST. N450883 EX. SHED EX. GARBAGE BINS R=95.49 A=54.62 C=53.88 N59 08'40"W 14 EX. CHANILINK FENCE EASEMENT PER INST. N450883 HYDRO KIOSK LINE OF HYDRO EASEMENT MH EX. SIGN CPED; SEE SURVEY 9000 N42 44'10"W 64.62 STEACIE DR. 12.0 m MH 12.0 m 1500 12.0 m PAINT LINES NEW CONC. SIDEWALK BPED; SEE SURVEY TOTAL PARKING ON SITE = 179 EX. SIGN HP EX. BUSH HP R=68.80 A=40.66 C=40.08 N59 43'50"W 7 EX. BUSH N70 05'20"W 7.92 OHW N75 41'30"W 31.60 OHW CB project projet designed by conçu par drawn by dessiné par date drawing / dessin PROPOSED COMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT BRDIGEHEAD COFFEE LK 2016 07 18 approved by approuvé par project no. no. du projet scale 329 MARCH ROAD OTTAWA, ON LK AK 1633 as noted SITE PLAN EX. CONC. SIDEWALK 2 OVERALL SITE PLAN A100 SCALE 1 : 400 0 2 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 METRES CASSON WAY revision révision sheet no. no. de la feuille A100 SHEET SIZE: ARCH D (24"x36")

Kanata Mews Development Appendix B Intersection Capacity Analysis Reports 19

HCM 2010 TWSC 1: Site Access & March Road Existing Traffic (2016) - AM Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Movement SET SER NWL NWT NEL NER Vol, veh/h 1125 24 25 2063 9 12 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 9 9 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 800-0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 1 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1223 26 27 2242 10 13 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1258 0 2421 633 Stage 1 - - - - 1245 - Stage 2 - - - - 1176 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.14-6.84 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22-3.52 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 549-27 422 Stage 1 - - - - 235 - Stage 2 - - - - 255 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 549-25 419 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 120 - Stage 1 - - - - 233 - Stage 2 - - - - 242 - Approach SE NW NE HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 25 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT SET SER Capacity (veh/h) 203 549 - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.112 0.049 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 25 11.9 - - - HCM Lane LOS D B - - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0.2 - - - 329 March Road - Kanata Mews Synchro 8 Report McIntosh Perry Consulting Engineers Ltd. Page 1

HCM 2010 TWSC 1: Site Access & March Road Existing Traffic (2016) - PM Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.4 Movement SET SER NWL NWT NEL NER Vol, veh/h 1946 38 15 1295 7 15 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 6 6 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 800-0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 1 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 2115 41 16 1408 8 16 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 2163 0 2878 1084 Stage 1 - - - - 2142 - Stage 2 - - - - 736 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.14-6.84 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22-3.52 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 244-13 212 Stage 1 - - - - 76 - Stage 2 - - - - 435 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 244-12 211 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 61 - Stage 1 - - - - 76 - Stage 2 - - - - 406 - Approach SE NW NE HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.2 43.1 HCM LOS E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT SET SER Capacity (veh/h) 118 244 - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.203 0.067 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 43.1 20.8 - - - HCM Lane LOS E C - - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 0.2 - - - 329 March Road - Kanata Mews Synchro 8 Report McIntosh Perry Consulting Engineers Ltd. Page 2

HCM 2010 TWSC 1: Site Access & March Road 2017 Background Traffic - AM Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Movement SET SER NWL NWT NEL NER Vol, veh/h 1142 24 25 2094 9 12 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 9 9 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 800-0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 1 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1241 26 27 2276 10 13 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1276 0 2455 643 Stage 1 - - - - 1263 - Stage 2 - - - - 1192 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.14-6.84 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22-3.52 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 540-25 416 Stage 1 - - - - 230 - Stage 2 - - - - 250 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 540-24 413 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 117 - Stage 1 - - - - 228 - Stage 2 - - - - 238 - Approach SE NW NE HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 25.5 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT SET SER Capacity (veh/h) 198 540 - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.115 0.05 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 25.5 12 - - - HCM Lane LOS D B - - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0.2 - - - 329 March Road - Kanata Mews Synchro 8 Report McIntosh Perry Consulting Engineers Ltd. Page 3

HCM 2010 TWSC 1: Site Access & March Road 2017 Background Traffic - PM Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.4 Movement SET SER NWL NWT NEL NER Vol, veh/h 1975 39 15 1314 7 15 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 6 6 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 800-0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 1 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 2147 42 16 1428 8 16 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 2195 0 2921 1101 Stage 1 - - - - 2174 - Stage 2 - - - - 747 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.14-6.84 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22-3.52 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 237-12 207 Stage 1 - - - - 73 - Stage 2 - - - - 429 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 237-11 206 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 59 - Stage 1 - - - - 73 - Stage 2 - - - - 400 - Approach SE NW NE HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.2 44.3 HCM LOS E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT SET SER Capacity (veh/h) 115 237 - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.208 0.069 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 44.3 21.3 - - - HCM Lane LOS E C - - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 0.2 - - - 329 March Road - Kanata Mews Synchro 8 Report McIntosh Perry Consulting Engineers Ltd. Page 4

HCM 2010 TWSC 1: Site Access & March Road 2022 Background Traffic - AM Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.3 Movement SET SER NWL NWT NEL NER Vol, veh/h 1230 26 27 2256 10 13 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 10 10 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 800-0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 1 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1337 28 29 2452 11 14 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1375 0 2646 693 Stage 1 - - - - 1361 - Stage 2 - - - - 1285 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.14-6.84 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22-3.52 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 495-19 386 Stage 1 - - - - 203 - Stage 2 - - - - 223 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 495-18 383 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 102 - Stage 1 - - - - 201 - Stage 2 - - - - 210 - Approach SE NW NE HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.2 29.1 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT SET SER Capacity (veh/h) 174 495 - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.144 0.059 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 29.1 12.7 - - - HCM Lane LOS D B - - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 0.2 - - - 329 March Road - Kanata Mews Synchro 8 Report McIntosh Perry Consulting Engineers Ltd. Page 7

HCM 2010 TWSC 1: Site Access & March Road 2022 Background Traffic - PM Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.5 Movement SET SER NWL NWT NEL NER Vol, veh/h 2128 42 16 1416 8 16 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 7 7 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 800-0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 1 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 2313 46 17 1539 9 17 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 2366 0 3147 1186 Stage 1 - - - - 2343 - Stage 2 - - - - 804 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.14-6.84 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22-3.52 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 203 - ~ 8 181 Stage 1 - - - - 58 - Stage 2 - - - - 401 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 203 - ~ 7 180 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 47 - Stage 1 - - - - 58 - Stage 2 - - - - 367 - Approach SE NW NE HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.3 58.2 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT SET SER Capacity (veh/h) 93 203 - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.281 0.086 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 58.2 24.4 - - - HCM Lane LOS F C - - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1 0.3 - - - Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 329 March Road - Kanata Mews Synchro 8 Report McIntosh Perry Consulting Engineers Ltd. Page 8

HCM 2010 TWSC 1: Site Access & March Road 2017 Total Traffic - AM Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.2 Movement SET SER NWL NWT NEL NER Vol, veh/h 1116 77 81 2066 47 62 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 9 9 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 800-0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 1 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1213 84 88 2246 51 67 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1306 0 2563 657 Stage 1 - - - - 1264 - Stage 2 - - - - 1299 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.14-6.84 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22-3.52 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 526 - ~ 21 407 Stage 1 - - - - 229 - Stage 2 - - - - 220 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 526 - ~ 17 404 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 100 - Stage 1 - - - - 227 - Stage 2 - - - - 183 - Approach SE NW NE HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.5 60.4 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT SET SER Capacity (veh/h) 175 526 - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.677 0.167 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 60.4 13.2 - - - HCM Lane LOS F B - - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 4 0.6 - - - Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 329 March Road - Kanata Mews Synchro 8 Report McIntosh Perry Consulting Engineers Ltd. Page 5

HCM 2010 TWSC 1: Site Access & March Road 2017 Total Traffic - PM Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.5 Movement SET SER NWL NWT NEL NER Vol, veh/h 1960 68 26 1308 20 42 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 6 6 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 800-0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 1 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 2130 74 28 1422 22 46 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 2210 0 2940 1108 Stage 1 - - - - 2173 - Stage 2 - - - - 767 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.14-6.84 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22-3.52 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 234 - ~ 12 204 Stage 1 - - - - 73 - Stage 2 - - - - 419 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 234 - ~ 11 203 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 58 - Stage 1 - - - - 73 - Stage 2 - - - - 369 - Approach SE NW NE HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.4 76.9 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT SET SER Capacity (veh/h) 112 234 - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.602 0.121 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 76.9 22.5 - - - HCM Lane LOS F C - - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 3 0.4 - - - Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 329 March Road - Kanata Mews Synchro 8 Report McIntosh Perry Consulting Engineers Ltd. Page 6

HCM 2010 TWSC 1: Site Access & March Road 2022 Total Traffic - AM Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.8 Movement SET SER NWL NWT NEL NER Vol, veh/h 1204 79 83 2228 48 63 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 10 10 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 800-0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 1 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1309 86 90 2422 52 68 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1405 0 2753 707 Stage 1 - - - - 1362 - Stage 2 - - - - 1391 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.14-6.84 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22-3.52 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 482 - ~ 16 378 Stage 1 - - - - 203 - Stage 2 - - - - 196 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 482 - ~ 13 375 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 87 - Stage 1 - - - - 201 - Stage 2 - - - - 159 - Approach SE NW NE HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.5 82.7 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT SET SER Capacity (veh/h) 154 482 - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.783 0.187 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 82.7 14.2 - - - HCM Lane LOS F B - - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 5 0.7 - - - Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 329 March Road - Kanata Mews Synchro 8 Report McIntosh Perry Consulting Engineers Ltd. Page 9

HCM 2010 TWSC 1: Site Access & March Road 2022 Total Traffic - PM Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.2 Movement SET SER NWL NWT NEL NER Vol, veh/h 2113 71 27 1410 21 43 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 7 7 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 800-0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 1 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 2297 77 29 1533 23 47 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 2381 0 3167 1194 Stage 1 - - - - 2342 - Stage 2 - - - - 825 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.14-6.84 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.84 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.84 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.22-3.52 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 200 - ~ 8 179 Stage 1 - - - - 58 - Stage 2 - - - - 391 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 200 - ~ 7 178 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 47 - Stage 1 - - - - 58 - Stage 2 - - - - 334 - Approach SE NW NE HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.5 114.5 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NELn1 NWL NWT SET SER Capacity (veh/h) 93 200 - - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.748 0.147 - - - HCM Control Delay (s) 114.5 26.1 - - - HCM Lane LOS F D - - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 3.8 0.5 - - - Notes ~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 329 March Road - Kanata Mews Synchro 8 Report McIntosh Perry Consulting Engineers Ltd. Page 10