Proposed Project I 35 Improvements from SH 195 to I 10

Similar documents
Caldwell. Guadalupe Hays Travis Williamson. Georgetown Hutto Manor. New Braunfels. Development Corporation INTERSTATE

MetroExpress Improvements

I-820 (East) Project Description. Fort Worth District. Reconstruct Southern I-820/SH 121 Interchange

PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS

TURNPIKE SYSTEM. Summary information from: Texas Department of Transportation GENERAL INFORMATION & SYSTEM MAP JOA REALTY

Purpose and Need Report

PORTS-TO-PLAINS. Corridor Planning. Ports-to-Plains Stakeholder Meeting

Making Mobility Better, Together

system performance I-820 East Loop FM 156 TxDOT is working to expand its busiest metropolitan corridors.

SH 249 IN GRIMES COUNTY. Open House April 3, 2014

CAPITAL AREA RURAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

Energy Technical Memorandum

NORTH HOUSTON HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (NHHIP)

Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Freeway System Reconstruction Study

RTID Travel Demand Modeling: Assumptions and Method of Analysis

SOUTHERN GATEWAY. Transportation and Trinity River Project Committee 11 May 2015

MAP OR PHOTO. Public Meeting & Open House July 23, Project Roadway Limits From: FM 1957 To: FM 471. Counties Bexar & Medina

SH 249 PUBLIC MEETING DESIGN CHANGES FROM FM 2920 TO HARDIN STORE ROAD

U.S. System Summary: ARIZONA/SOUTHWEST

Regional Transportation Plan: APPENDIX P

TXDOT PLANNING CONFERENCE. Quincy D. Allen, P.E. Houston District Engineer June 16, 2016

Help shape your community investment in Wake Transit. Fiscal Year 2019 Draft Work Plan Summary

New Jersey Turnpike Authority Interchange 6 to 9 Widening Program

TransNet Dollars Keep San Diego Moving

I-4 Beyond the Ultimate. Florida Transportation Builders Association January 18, 2019

Rocky Mount. Transportation Plan. Transportation Planning Division. Virginia Department of Transportation

NORTH HOUSTON HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (NHHIP): SEGMENT 3. April 19, 2018 NHHIP April 19, 2018

STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Report

The Northeast Corridor Master Plan Amtrak s Next Generation High-Speed Rail and Northeastern Maryland

Request for Design Exception (#1) S.M. Wright Phase IIB

SOUTH TEXAS COMMISSION MEETING

ALTERNATIVE PROJECT DELIVERY

Western ND Meeting. February 19, 2014 Grant Levi, NDDOT Director

Expansion Projects Description

DRAFT Subject to modifications

Leadership NC. November 8, 2018

Chapter 7: Corridor Visions

Planning of the HSR Network

Chapter 9 Recommended Locally Preferred Alternative and Alternatives for Evaluation in Draft SEIS/SEIR

US 59 (SOUTHWEST FWY) IH 610 (West Loop) to SH 288 (South Fwy)

Mass Transit in Charlotte and San Antonio. Keith T. Parker, AICP

S.M. Wright Project (I-45, US 175, SH 310) and Road to Work Opportunity Program. Transportation and Trinity River Project Committee May 23, 2016

Maryland Gets to Work

Capital Metro Plans & Projects Update NASWC July 27, capmetro.org

V03. APTA Multimodal Operations Planning Workshop August Green Line LRT

4.0 TIER 2 ALTERNATIVES

IH 45 (GULF FWY) IH 10 (Katy Fwy) to IH 610 S (South Loop) 2010 Rank: Rank: 12

BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY

Challenges in a Post-Katrina Environment East-West Corridor Project Overview February, 2007

Green Line Long-Term Investments

STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY Austin District FY STIP

Executive Summary. Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Priority Corridor Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis October 13, 2009.

ALAMEDA CORRIDOR. A A Project of National Significance. TRB Summer Conference MTS as a Component of the Nation s Transportation System June 25, 2002

Road User Cost Analysis

Alternatives Analysis Findings Report

Richmond Area MPO Regional Priority Transportation Projects

Is Lafayette ready for a traffic loop?

Chapter 7. Transportation Capital Improvement Projects. Chapter 7

Proposed Program of Interrelated Projects

US 70 Corridor Planning for the Future

2007 Traffic Impact Mitigation Fee Update Study

Public Information Workshop

TEXAS RURAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2035 (TRTP 2035)

STATE LOOP 195 PUBLIC MEETING. Footer Text

FIELD APPLICATIONS OF CORSIM: I-40 FREEWAY DESIGN EVALUATION, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK. Michelle Thomas

REGIONAL REPORT PETITION: TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TYLER DISTRICT

DART Priorities Overview

The range of alternatives has been reviewed with the RTAC Subgroup and the preliminary analysis is proceeding on the following HCT alternatives:

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

Mountainland Association of Governments SPRINGVILLE-SPANISH FORK AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY APRIL 2012

Reston Transportation Strategy July 9, 2018

STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY

IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS

4 COSTS AND OPERATIONS

Transportation Highway Engineering Conference February 24, 2015

Gold Line Status Report FasTracks Citizens Advisory Committee March 19, 2014

Section III Transportation and Stormwater Projects Receiving Additional Funding Project Detail Sheets Alphabetical Listing by Project Name Five Year

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

CTA Blue Line Study Area

Note: The October 2007 version of this report has been updated in this December 2008 report to present costs in year 2007 dollars.

CITY OF TORRANCE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION INFRASTRUCTURE UPDATE

Open House. Highway212. Meetings. Corridor Access Management, Safety & Phasing Plan. 5:30 to 6:30 p.m. - Southwest Corridor Transportation Coalition

Capital Metro Future Transit - Executive Summary of NewStarts Submittal Page 1 of 11. u»ux «"»«I. METRO igij TRANSIT ; J

Jarrell Independent School District

US 81 Bypass of Chickasha Environmental Assessment Public Meeting

Task Force Meeting January 15, 2009

ST. CROIX RIVER CROSSING PROJECT 2004 SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM SUPPLEMENT FOR THE PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE:

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Study Purpose. Study Impetus. Issues. Economic Development Corridor Feasibility Study. City of LaPorte, Indiana

WOODVILLE HIGHWAY (SR 363) PD&E STUDY From Capital Circle Southeast To Paul Russell Road FPID NUMBER: Public Hearing

Develop ground transportation improvements to make the Airport a multi-modal regional

Proposed Downtown Miami Link

2016 PSRC REGIONAL & KING COUNTYWIDE EASTSIDE FUNDING AWARDS. Eastside Transportation Partnership September 9, 2016

DART Capital Program Update

Sepulveda Pass Corridor Systems Planning Study

Kenosha-Racine-Milwaukee (KRM)

Wentzville Parkway South Phase 2 & 2A

Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study

Mobility Corridor Updates. Transit & Active Transportation Projects

Subarea Study. Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project. Final Version 1. Washington County.

Chapter 7: Travel Demand Analysis. Chapter 8. Plan Scenarios. LaSalle Community Center. Image Credit: Town of LaSalle

Transcription:

I 35 ROADWAY Proposed Project I 35 Improvements from SH 195 to I 10 The existing I 35 facility from State Highway 195 (SH 195) north of Georgetown to Interstate 10 (I 10) in San Antonio varies from four to ten lanes; most of the facility, approximately 85 miles, is six lanes. The purpose of the proposed project is to increase capacity and improve mobility on I 35. The project proposed by I 35 Corridor Segment 3 would widen I 35 from SH 195 north of Georgetown to I 10 in San Antonio to a minimum eight lane controlled access facility for a distance of approximately 113 miles. If no improvements are made to I 35 traffic demand would leave SH 130 as the alternative option. The estimated cost for the conceptual project is between $2.4 billion and $3.45 billion, including design and construction. This cost, in 2010 dollars, does not include the purchase of right of way. The estimated project costs could increase due to right of way purchases and potential impacts to properties.

I 35 ROADWAY Proposed Project I 35 Improvements from SH 195 to Williamson/Bell County Line The existing I 35 facility from State Highway 195 (SH 195) north of Georgetown to the Williamson/Bell County Line is six lanes, with a four lane section that is approximately one mile in length. The purpose of the proposed project is to increase capacity and improve mobility on I 35. The project proposed by I 35 Corridor Segment 3 would widen I 35 from SH 195 north of Georgetown to the Williamson/Bell County Line to an eightlane controlled access facility for a distance of approximately 11 miles. The estimated cost for the conceptual project is between $300 million and $400 million, including design and construction. This cost, in 2010 dollars, does not include the purchase of right of way. The estimated project costs could increase due to right of way purchases and potential impacts to properties.

I 35 ROADWAY Proposed Project I 35 HOV/Toll Lane from SH 45 SE to I 10 The existing I 35 facility from State Highway 45 Southeast (SH 45 SE) northeast of Buda to Interstate 10 (I 10) in San Antonio varies from four to eight lanes; most of the facility, approximately 47 miles, is six lanes. The purpose of the proposed I 35 highoccupancy vehicle (HOV)/toll lane project is to increase capacity and improve mobility on I 35. The project proposed by I 35 Corridor Segment 3 would add an HOV/toll lane in each direction from SH 45 SE northeast of Buda to I 10 in San Antonio for a distance of approximately 69 miles. If no improvements are made to I 35 traffic demand would leave SH 130 as the alternative option. The estimated cost for the conceptual project is between $6.2 billion and $8.85 billion, including design and construction. This cost, in 2010 dollars, does not include the purchase of right of way. The estimated project costs could increase due to right of way purchases and potential impacts to properties.

I 35 ROADWAY Proposed Project I 35 Ramp Modifications from US 290 to Ben White (SH 71) The existing I 35 facility from U.S. Highway 290 East (US 290E) north of Downtown Austin to Ben White (State Highway 71) south of Downtown Austin varies from six to eight lanes. The purpose of the proposed I 35 Ramp Modifications project is to increase safety and improve mobility on I 35. The project proposed by I 35 Corridor Segment 3 would modify access ramps along I 35 to improve traffic flow on I 35 main lanes and frontage roads for a distance of approximately eight miles. An estimated cost cannot be determined at this time. Further study is necessary to identify demand management needs at each access ramp.

I 35 ROADWAY Proposed Project I 35 Continuous Frontage Roads The existing I 35 facility from Williamson to Bexar County has frontage roads, except for two segments in the Georgetown area and two segments in the Buda/Kyle area. The purpose of the proposed project is to increase safety and improve mobility on I 35. The project proposed by I 35 Corridor Segment 3 would construct continuous frontage roads along I 35 from Williamson to Bexar County. The total length of frontage road construction is approximately six miles. The estimated cost for the conceptual project is between $50 million and $100 million, including design and construction. This cost, in 2010 dollars, does not include the purchase of right of way. The estimated project costs could increase due to right of way purchases and potential impacts to properties.

CONNECTING OR PARALLEL ROADWAY TO I 35 Proposed Project I 10 Improvements The existing Interstate 10 East (I 10 E) facility from I 35 in Downtown San Antonio to State Highway (SH) 130 northeast of Seguin is four lanes. The purpose of the proposed I 10 E project is to improve regional mobility and connectivity with I 35. Project Proposed by Corridor Segment 3 The project proposed by I 35 Corridor Segment 3 would widen I 10 E from I 35 in Downtown San Antonio to SH 130 northeast of Seguin to six lanes for a distance of approximately 42 miles. The estimated cost for the conceptual project is between $950 million and $1.4 billion, including design and construction. This cost, in 2010 dollars, does not include the purchase of right of way. The estimated project costs could increase due to right of way purchases and potential impacts to properties.

CONNECTING OR PARALLEL ROADWAY TO I 35 Proposed Project Loop 1604 Improvements The existing Loop 1604 South (S) facility from I 35 NE in Live Oak to Interstate 10 East (I 10 E) south of Converse varies from two to four lanes. The purpose of the proposed Loop 1604 South (S) project is to increase capacity on Loop 1604 and improve connectivity to I 35. Project Proposed by Corridor Segment 3 The project proposed by I 35 Corridor Segment 3 would upgrade Loop 1604 S to a six lane controlled access facility from I 35 NE in Live Oak to I 10 E south of Converse for a distance of approximately eight miles. The estimated cost for the conceptual project is between $300 million and $400 million, including design and construction. This cost, in 2010 dollars, does not include the purchase of right of way. The estimated project costs could increase due to right of way purchases and potential impacts to properties.

CONNECTING OR PARALLEL ROADWAY TO I 35 Proposed Project SH 21 Connector from I 35 to SH 130 The existing State Highway (SH) 21 facility from State Highway (SH) 80 east of San Marcos to State Highway (SH) 130 north of Mendoza varies from two to four lanes; most of the facility, approximately 13 miles, is two lanes. The purpose of the proposed SH 21 connector project is to provide improved roadway connections between I 35 and SH 130. The project proposed by I 35 Corridor Segment 3 would upgrade SH 21 to a four lane controlled access facility from SH 80 east of San Marcos to SH 130 north of Mendoza for a distance of approximately 17 miles. SH 21 from San Marcos to Bastrop has been identified by the Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO) as a highly congested corridor in 2010 and 2035 and is currently under study. The estimated cost for the conceptual project is between $450 million and $700 million, including design and construction. This cost, in 2010 dollars, does not include the purchase of right of way. The estimated project costs could increase due to right of way purchases and potential impacts to properties.

CONNECTING OR PARALLEL ROADWAY TO I 35 Proposed Project SH 71 Connector from I 35 to SH 130 The existing State Highway (SH) 71 facility from I 35 south of Downtown Austin to State Highway (SH) 130 east of Del Valle varies from four to eight lanes; most of the facility, approximately five miles, is six lanes. The purpose of the proposed SH 71 connector project is to provide improved roadway connections between I 35 and SH 130. The project proposed by I 35 Corridor Segment 3 would upgrade SH 71 to a controlledaccess facility from I 35 south of Downtown Austin to SH 130 east of Del Valle for a distance of approximately 8.5 miles. Portions of the project area exist as controlled access facilities reducing the project improvements to a distance of approximately 4.5 miles. SH 71 from I 35 to Bastrop has been identified by the Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO) as a highly congested corridor in 2010 and 2035 and is currently under study. The estimated cost for the conceptual project is between $150 million and $200 million, including design and construction. This cost, in 2010 dollars, does not include the purchase of right of way. The estimated project costs could increase due to right of way purchases and potential impacts to properties.

CONNECTING OR PARALLEL ROADWAY TO I 35 Proposed Project SH 80 Connector from I 35 to SH 130 The existing State Highway (SH) 80 facility from I 35 east of San Marcos to State Highway (SH) 130 north of Fentress is four lanes. The purpose of the proposed SH 80 connector project is to provide improved roadway connections between I 35 and SH 130. Project Proposed by Corridor Segment 3 The project proposed by I 35 Corridor Segment 3 would upgrade SH 80 to a four lane controlled access facility from I 35 east of San Marcos to SH 130 north of Fentress for a distance of approximately 11 miles. The estimated cost for the conceptual project is between $300 million and $450 million, including design and construction. This cost, in 2010 dollars, does not include the purchase of right of way. The estimated project costs could increase due to right of way purchases and potential impacts to properties.

The existing U.S. Highway (US) 290 facility from I 35 in Downtown Austin to State Highway (SH) 130 east of Manor is four lanes. The section of US 290 between I 35 and US 183 is controlledaccess, while the remaining portion is signalized. INFORMATION BOARD US 290 Connector from I 35 to SH 130 Project Information The Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority (CTRMA) broke ground on the first phase of the US 290 Toll/Manor Expressway in March 2010. The Manor Expressway will be a 6.2 mile, limited access toll road with three lanes in each direction. It will be constructed in an expanded median of US 290 and will be constructed in two phases: Phase 1 of the Manor Expressway will consist of a direct connect flyover interchange at US 183 and US 290 and a 1.4 mile stretch of the Manor Expressway between US 183 and Chimney Hill Boulevard. Phase 2 will extend the Manor Expressway from Chimney Hill Boulevard to east of Parmer Lane. The existing US 290 will be improved and will remain non tolled. The Manor Expressway will link important roadways in the region, including US 183 and the new SH 130 toll road. According to the CTRMA, the project is estimated to cost approximately $600+ million.

CONNECTING OR PARALLEL ROADWAY TO I 35 Proposed Project US 183 Improvements from US 290 E to SH 71 The existing U.S. Highway (US) 183 facility from U.S. Highway 290 East (US 290 E) northeast of Downtown Austin to State Highway (SH) 71 southeast of Downtown Austin is four lanes. The purpose of the proposed US 183 project is to improve system connectivity with the I 35 corridor. The project proposed by I 35 Corridor Segment 3 would upgrade US 183 to a four lane, full freeway from US 290 E northeast of Downtown Austin to SH 71 southeast of Downtown Austin for a distance of approximately eight miles. A portion of the project area exists as a four lane controlled access facility reducing the project area to a distance of approximately seven miles. The estimated cost for the conceptual project is between $200 million and $300 million, including design and construction. This cost, in 2010 dollars, does not include the purchase of right of way. The estimated project costs could increase due to right of way purchases and potential impacts to properties.

CONNECTING OR PARALLEL ROADWAY TO I 35 Proposed Project US 183 Improvements from SH 71 to SH 45 SE The existing U.S. Highway (US) 183 facility from State Highway (SH) 71 southeast of Downtown Austin to State Highway 45 Southeast (SH 45 SE) in Mustang Ridge is four lanes. The purpose of the US 183 project is to improve system connectivity within the I 35 corridor. The project proposed by I 35 Corridor Segment 3 would upgrade US 183 to a four lane, full freeway from SH 71 southeast of Downtown Austin to SH 45 SE in Mustang Ridge for a distance of approximately ten miles. The estimated cost for the conceptual project is between $250 million and $400 million, including design and construction. This cost, in 2010 dollars, does not include the purchase of right of way. The estimated project costs could increase due to right of way purchases and potential impacts to properties.

CONNECTING OR PARALLEL ROADWAY TO I 35 Proposed Project New Braunfels Connector from I 35 to SH 130 The purpose of the proposed connector project is to provide improved roadway connections between I 35 in New Braunfels and State Highway (SH) 130 north of Kingsbury. The project proposed by I 35 Corridor Segment 3 would construct a new four lane controlled access facility from I 35 in New Braunfels to SH 130 north of Kingsbury. An estimated cost cannot be determined at this time because an active project alignment has not been determined. If the project proceeds in the Segment 3 I 35 Plan, detailed environmental and engineering studies as well as additional public involvement would need to be conducted to determine potential project costs.

LOOPS AND INTERCHANGES Proposed Project I 35 Interchange Improvements The existing I 35 interchanges at Interstate 410 (I 410) and Loop 1604 are on the north side of San Antonio. The purpose of the proposed I 35 interchange projects is to improve mobility on I 35. Project Proposed by Corridor Segment 3 The project proposed by I 35 Corridor Segment 3 would improve two I 35/I 410 interchanges and the I 35/Loop 1604 interchange in north San Antonio. The estimated cost for the conceptual projects is between $600 million and $900 million, including design and construction. This cost, in 2010 dollars, does not include the purchase of right of way. The estimated project costs could increase due to right of way purchases and potential impacts to properties.

LOOPS AND INTERCHANGES Proposed Project New Braunfels Outer Loop The purpose of the proposed New Braunfels Outer Loop project is to improve system connectivity with I 35 in the New Braunfels area. Project Proposed by Corridor Segment 3 The project proposed by I 35 Corridor Segment 3 would construct a four lane loop around the City of New Braunfels. TxDOT s New Braunfels Outer Loop Study Report, August 2008, recommends a preferred corridor that is approximately 40 miles in length. The Outer Loop is a proposed future bypass route around the City of New Braunfels. As currently envisioned, the New Braunfels Outer Loop will include improvements to existing roadways and the construction of new location facilities. An estimated cost cannot be determined at this time. TxDOT s New Braunfels Outer Loop Study Report, August 2008, notes that costs will be determined during future planning and environmental studies. The identified study area currently ranges in width from 1.6 miles to 3.2 miles.

LOOPS AND INTERCHANGES Proposed Project San Marcos Outer Loop The purpose of the proposed San Marcos Outer Loop project is to improve system connectivity with I 35 in the San Marcos area. Project Proposed by Corridor Segment 3 The project proposed by I 35 Corridor Segment 3 would construct a four lane loop around the City of San Marcos. The San Marcos Transportation Master Plan, July 2004, recommends a preferred corridor that is approximately 20 miles in length. The Outer Loop, Farm to Market Road (FM) 110, is a proposed future bypass route around the City of San Marcos. As currently envisioned, the San Marcos Outer Loop will include improvements to existing roadways and the construction of new location facilities. According to the San Marcos Transportation Master Plan, July 2004, the project is estimated to cost approximately $264 million. The first two phases of the Outer Loop (FM 110) are listed in the CAMPO FY 2008 2011 Transportation Improvement Program, adopted February 12, 2007. The estimated cost of FM 110 from 1 35/McCarty Road to SH 123 is approximately $34 million.

SH 130 ALTERNATIVE Proposed Project I 35/SH 45 SE/SH 130 The existing I 35 facility from U.S. Highway (US) 195 north of Georgetown to State Highway 45 Southeast (SH 45 SE) northeast of Buda varies from six to eight lanes. The existing State Highway (SH) 130 facility from I 35 to SH 45 SE in Mustang Ridge is four tolled lanes, and an extension of the four tolled lanes are planned from Mustang Ridge to Interstate 10 (I 10) northeast of Seguin. The existing SH 45 SE facility from I 35 to SH 130 is also four tolled lanes. The purpose of the proposed project is to improve mobility on I 35. The project proposed by I 35 Corridor Segment 3 would involve the following actions: Converting one general purpose lane on I 35 in each direction to a high occupancy vehicle/toll lane from US 195 to SH 45 SE and re designating the facility from an Interstate to Business Route I 35; Widening SH 130 to six lanes from US 195 north of Georgetown to SH 45 SE in Mustang Ridge, removing the tolls, and re designating this portion of SH 130 to Interstate 35; Widening SH 45 SE to six lanes from Mustang Ridge to northeast of Buda to I 35, removing the tolls, and re designating SH 45 SE to Interstate35; and, Widening SH 130 to six lanes from Mustang Ridge to I 10 in Seguin and removing the tolls (this portion would remain designated as SH 130). Note: Any Interstate re designation would require the approval of the Federal Highway Administration. An estimated cost cannot be determined at this time.

RAILWAY Proposed Project Passenger Rail from Austin to Elgin The purpose of the proposed commuter rail project is to provide an alternate mode of transportation that will remove traffic from the other transportation systems along the I 35 corridor. Project Proposed by Corridor Segment 3 The I 35 Corridor Segment 3 is considering a commuter rail system that connects Austin to Elgin. Conceptual Project Cost Estimate According to the CAMPO 2035 Regional Transportation Plan, adopted May 24, 2010, the proposed Elgin Rail project cost is $327 million from Downtown Austin to Elgin.

RAILWAY Proposed Project Passenger Rail from Georgetown to San Antonio The purpose of the proposed commuter passenger rail service is to provide an alternate mode of transportation that will remove traffic from the other transportation systems along the I 35 corridor. The I 35 Corridor Segment 3 is considering a commuter passenger rail system that connects Georgetown to San Antonio. An estimated cost cannot be determined without a proposed alignment and a determination of the type of passenger rail system. For reference, the CAMPO 2035 Regional Transportation Plan, adopted May 24, 2010, lists the proposed Lone Star Rail project cost as $467 million from Georgetown to the Hays County line within CAMPO.

RAILWAY Proposed Project High Speed Commuter Rail The purpose of the proposed regional high speed commuter rail project is to provide an alternate mode of transportation that will remove traffic from the other transportation systems along the I 35 corridor between San Antonio, Austin and Dallas. The I 35 Corridor Segment 3 is considering a regional high speed commuter rail system that connects the major metropolitan areas of San Antonio, Austin and Dallas. An estimated cost cannot be determined without a proposed alignment. For reference, the core line of the Texas T Bone High Speed Rail (HSR) system proposed by the Texas High Speed Rail and Transportation Corporation is estimated to cost from $30 $50 million per mile. The I 35 corridor from San Antonio to Dallas is within the Texas T Bone HSR project area.

RAILWAY Proposed Project New Freight Rail Construction The two purposes of the proposed freight rail relocation project are to: provide an alternate freight route to allow commuter rail travel along the I 35 corridor, and improve freight rail operations throughout the State. The I 35 Corridor Segment 3 is considering the construction of a new freight rail line to the east of I 35 from San Antonio to Taylor to allow some Union Pacific trains to move off of the existing Union Pacific rail line (west of I 35), allow the possibility of passenger rail service on the existing line, increase freight capacity, and enhance safety. Any new construction would make every reasonable effort to avoid productive agricultural lands. It should be noted that the Texas Rail Relocation Fund, created by constitutional amendment in 2005, still remains unfunded. According to TxDOT s Central Texas Rail Relocation Study (July 2008) and TxDOT s San Antonio Region Freight Study (July 2008), the estimated freight rail relocation cost is over $2.4 billion (2007 dollars).