Synthesis of Cal Poly Senior Projects Relating to Public Transportation in San Luis Obispo County

Similar documents
Rail~Volution 2005 Hal Ryan Johnson, AICP, Bus Rapid Transit Project Manager Utah Transit Authority September 7, 2005

JOINT SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLANS FOR SLO AND RTA TRANSIT Working Paper Six (RTA): Capital Improvement Program

Develop ground transportation improvements to make the Airport a multi-modal regional

Independence Institute Denver West Parkway, Suite 185 Golden, Colorado i2i.org/cad.aspx BRT = BTR

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

Needs and Community Characteristics

Pedestrians, Cars, Buses and Trains? Considerations for Rapid Transit Service at Western University

SUMMARY OF COMMENTS AT PUBLIC OPEN HOUSES SCOPING OF ALTERNATIVES GATEWAY CORRIDOR ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS

5.16: Encourage the installation of alternative fueling stations and sites that are County. Supporting Actions: TLU 2: Alternative Vehicles

The Engineering Department recommends Council receive this report for information.

Community Open Houses November 29 December 7, 2017

CITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6

Restoration of Historic Streetcar Services in Downtown Los Angeles

Policy Note. Vanpools in the Puget Sound Region The case for expanding vanpool programs to move the most people for the least cost.

SERVICE DESIGN GUIDELINES

Energy Technical Memorandum

Pacific Electric Right-of-Way / West Santa Ana Branch Corridor Alternatives Analysis

Unified Corridor Investment Study DRAFT Step 2 Scenario Analysis Report

Leadership NC. November 8, 2018

Executive Summary. Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Priority Corridor Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis October 13, 2009.

Service Quality: Higher Ridership: Very Affordable: Image:

The project faces a number of challenges:

Chapter 7. Transportation Capital Improvement Projects. Chapter 7

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

4.1 Land Use. SECTION CONTENTS Land Use Transit Transportation Technology

Transportation Sustainability Program

BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY

CEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update

The Jack A. Markell Trail Delaware s Bicycle Highway New England Bike- Walk Summit

state, and federal levels, complete reconstruction and expansion of I35 in the near future is not likely.

East San Fernando Valley Transit Corridor. TAC Briefing December 4, 2013

3.15 SAFETY AND SECURITY

Parking Management Element

Successful Passenger Rail in the State of California

KRM Corridor Transit Service Options: Frequently Asked Questions

APPENDIX I: [FIXED-GUIDEWAY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY]

Stakeholders Advisory Working Groups (SAWGs) Traffic and Transit SAWG Meeting #7

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

MEDIA RELEASE. June 16, 2008 For Immediate Release

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MAY 5, 2016

NICTI Alternatives Analysis

6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Project Scoping Report Appendix B Project Web Site. APPENDIX B Project Web Site

PAPER FOR AREMA 2006 ANNUAL CONFERENCE LOS ANGELES UNION STATION RUN-THROUGH TRACKS UNION STATION TERMINAL IMPROVEMENTS. Paul Mak, PE, SE HDR Inc

Chapter 4 : THEME 2. Transportation

Maryland Gets to Work

Sepulveda Pass Corridor Systems Planning Study Final Compendium Report. Connecting the San Fernando Valley and the Westside

EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT

2.1 TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION. Expand regional rapid transit networks STRATEGIC DIRECTION

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS/ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT SCOPING BROCHURE

What We Heard Report - Metro Line NW LRT

Metro Green Line to LAX Alternatives Analysis. March 2012

Mass Transit in Charlotte and San Antonio. Keith T. Parker, AICP

RELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL INFORMATION ACT 1982

Sustainable Transportation Award Winner. UC/CSU Sustainability Conference Santa Barbara, 2006

North Shore Alternatives Analysis. May 2012

Passenger Rail Solar Electrification: A Primer. Oregon Department of Transportation Rail Division. June 2009

Click to edit Master title style

Appendix G: Rapid Transit Technology Backgrounder July 2017

I-820 (East) Project Description. Fort Worth District. Reconstruct Southern I-820/SH 121 Interchange

Submission to Greater Cambridge City Deal

Restoration of Historic Streetcar Services in Downtown Los Angeles

Metropolitan Council Budget Overview SFY

STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Report

Review of the Wake County Transit Plan

Connecting Cities, Connecting Regions, Connecting People

Validation Study. Proposed Railroad Grade Separation Algonquin Road at the Union Pacific Milwaukee Railroad. May 15, 2008.

The $600 Million Rebirth of San Diego Trolley

The range of alternatives has been reviewed with the RTAC Subgroup and the preliminary analysis is proceeding on the following HCT alternatives:

Bi-County Transitway/ Bethesda Station Access Demand Analysis

WELCOME. Transit Options Amherst - Buffalo Public Workshops

Sepulveda Pass Corridor Systems Planning Study Update

CITY OF ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 301 E. Huron St., P.O. Box 8647 Ann Arbor, Michigan

Transit Access Study

Challenges in a Post-Katrina Environment East-West Corridor Project Overview February, 2007

4. Transportation Plan

Calgary Transit and the Calgary Transportation Plan Chris Jordan, M.Sc., P.Eng. Coordinator, Strategic Transit Planning, Calgary Transit

Transit Access to the National Harbor

V03. APTA Multimodal Operations Planning Workshop August Green Line LRT

APPENDIX H. Transportation Impact Study

ALAMEDA CORRIDOR. A A Project of National Significance. TRB Summer Conference MTS as a Component of the Nation s Transportation System June 25, 2002

East San Fernando Valley Transit Corridor. Community Meetings April/May, 2012

What IS BRT, Really? Not BRT and RNY

SAN LUIS OBISPO TRANSIT SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN

SAN LUIS OBISPO TRANSIT SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN

Redefining Mobility Ready or not: Autonomous and connected vehicle planning and policy, now and in the future

Converting BRT to LRT in the Nation s Capital Ottawa, Canada. John Manconi City of Ottawa Ottawa, Canada

Chapter 4. Design and Analysis of Feeder-Line Bus. October 2016

Help shape your community investment in Wake Transit. Fiscal Year 2019 Draft Work Plan Summary

Application of Autonomous Vehicle Technology to Public Transit

TRAIN, BUS & TRANSIT

Sepulveda Pass Corridor Systems Planning Study

Memorandum of Understanding

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Janice Fortunato Senior Director Business Partnerships

Downtown Transit Connector. Making Transit Work for Rhode Island

Congestion Charging - An Idea Whose Time Has Come?

TEXAS CITY PARK & RIDE RIDERSHIP ANALYSIS

Public Transportation for a Greener Community

Preliminary Definition of Alternatives. 3.0 Preliminary Definition of Alternatives

Transcription:

Synthesis of Cal Poly Senior Projects Relating to Public Transportation in San Luis Obispo County In partial fulfillment of CE 424 Professor Eugene Jud By David Thornhill November 14, 2007

Purpose The purpose of this report is to examine several Cal Poly senior projects written on the topic of public transit in San Luis Obispo County and give a single report which will contain the important ideas of these projects. This report does it propose anything new but merely attempts to present results of previous project in one place. It is also hoped that by presenting and comparing the results, the discussion of implementing these transportation systems would be renewed and the work of these students will not be forgotten. Executive Summary The public transportation systems covered in these senior projects include commuter rail (1 project), light rail (3 projects), and bus rapid transit (1 project). The regions of San Luis Obispo County covered in these reports can be classified into three categories: North County (SLO to Paso Robles), South County (SLO to Santa Maria), and the North Coast (SLO to Hearst Castle). Most projects provide a map of the proposed route, stop locations, and one or more station designs. From looking at these reports, it can be seen that there are a number of different options available to the County of San Luis Obispo to promote public transportation and help reduce congestion on the roads. Traffic congestion will only increase with the growth of the county and something can be done to provide reliable ways of getting place to place. Simply widening roads cannot be the final answer. The personal car, while beneficial for ease of mobility, simply does not have the capacity that a public transportation system such as commuter rail, light rail or BRT can provide. Only when these systems are put into place and priority is taken away from the car, can we encourage commuters to use public transportation and make a step forward to solve problems of over congestion. The proposals listed in this report are only suggestions on ways to alleviate the problem but it seems apparent that something can be done. In looking at these reports, there were a number of similarities that need to be highlighted. The first was the need to address the area of US 101 between Atascadero and SLO known as the Cuesta grade. It was a major concern of most of these projects to alleviate congestion on this stretch of highway. With the expansion to six lanes through the Cuesta grade, this need is not as urgent as it once seemed, but the extra lane will not solve the problem forever. Eventually, we will need to find an alternative means of travel between SLO and the North County. Another general trend was the incorporation of current infrastructure with the new systems. In order to make the implementation of these proposals more feasible, current railroad tracks, right of ways, highways and roads, and stations would be used to reduce costs. It would be unlikely for a project to become a reality if it had to build up an entire network on its own.

Commuter Rail Feasibility Study for Service between the Cities of San Luis Obispo and Paso Robles, Nathan Smith (2005) Scope: North County This project looks at the feasibility of creating a commuter rail service from Paso Robles to San Luis Obispo in order to divert traffic away from the Cuesta grade portion of US 101. The route would follow the current Union Pacific rail lines with the addition of a tunnel through Cuesta grade to cut down on travel time. There are four tunnel options presented and one is recommended as the best option. The addition of a tunnel would be an expensive part of the project but recommended in order to compete with the car in travel time. Without the tunnel, a train would take too long to make it over the grade to convince commuters to use the train. Other suggestions include the addition of double tracks from San Luis Obispo to the proposed tunnel to eliminate conflicts between the commuter train and freight using the same tracks. There are six proposed stations: the San Luis Obispo Amtrak station, SLO Monterey St., Cal Poly California Blvd, Atascadero Highway 41, Templeton 4 th St., and Paso Robles Amtrack station The report concluded that at the current time, a commuter rail from SLO to Paso Robles is not yet feasible. There is not yet the demand necessary to require the addition of the train. With future projections on growth within the county, it is suggested that the project may become a possibility in twenty years when the need for a better mode of transportation grows.

San Luis Obispo/ Paso Robles Light Rail Feasibility Study, Daniel Lee and Anthony Lum (2005) Scope: North County This project looks at the feasibility of creating a light rail service from Paso Robles to San Luis Obispo in order to divert traffic away from the Cuesta grade portion of US 101. The route proposed would follow alongside the existing Union Pacific rail lines on separate tracks with the exception of a tunnel through Cuesta grade and traveling on streets within the cities. The report presents two alternative routes. Route A uses a tunnel through the Cuesta grade and has ten stops along the route. Route B follows the Union Pacific tracks through the grade and stops at seven locations. Both routes are estimated to take about 48 minutes to travel between SLO and Paso Robles. Even though it would be more expensive to construct a tunnel, Route A was suggested for its ability to serve more stations with a similar travel time. It was estimated that the preferred tunnel alignment would cost a total of $500 million to $700 million. No conclusion was made as to the timeline of the project and whether or not a light rail system is necessary for the moment or whether it should be a long term consideration.

Light Rail System for the County of San Luis Obispo, Adolfo Cacho (1997) Scope: South County This report looks at the development and design of a light rail system for south San Luis Obispo County. The proposed route would start at Cal Poly and extend southward into the city of Guadalupe with the possibility of extending service to Santa Maria. A light rail system would reduce dependence on automobiles and provide more choice and variety in moving among the south county. The LRT would travel on the current Union Pacific rail lines and stop at nine locations from SLO to Guadalupe. Implementing an LRT system would be good way of increasing option for travel among the South County and necessary we are to reduce the amount of car traffic along US 101. LRT wouldn t be either too hard to build or too expensive if the current infrastructure of the rail lines and existing stations are used. a if

Feasibility Study for North Coast Light Rail, Ryan Hayes and Matthew Holm (2001) Scope: North Coast This project looks at the possibility of a light rail system from San Luis Obispo to Hearst Castle. There are two routes examined, the first follows Highway 1 the entire length from SLO to Hearst Castle. Option 1 would be completed in two phases. Phase one would be to construct the track from SLO to Morro Bay. Phase two will be built once phase one begins operation. The second option is similar to the first with the addition of a detour into Los Osos, north to Morro Bay and then resumes travel along Highway 1. This would also be constructed in two phases with the first being the track from SLO to Los Osos and the second from Los Osos to Hearst Castle. Option 1 would have seven stop locations. Option two would add one more station located in Los Osos. It was decided to go with route one based on travel time and right-of-way restrictions related to the second option. Some sort of mass transit system is needed to reduce traffic along Highway 1 and this study concludes that light rail is a feasible option. Even though the population isn t high enough to be in the range of typically accepted numbers for a successful light rail system, a LRT system would attract enough riders to support the system.

Bus Rapid Transit: A Viable Transportation Option for San Luis Obispo, Kristina Skrehot and Josue Vaglienty (2003) Scope: North Coast, North County, South County This project proposes the implementation of a bus rapid transit system for SLO County. This system would be comprised of two main routes. Route A would start in Paso Robles and follow US 101 southbound to Nipomo with two detours through the CBD s of SLO and Arroyo Grande. Route B would start in Morro Bay and follow Highway 1 to SLO, stops ay Cal Poly and the CBD before ending at SLO airport. The BRT would share existing road already in place with the exception of Cuesta grade for route A where an HOV lane is recommended to give preferential treatment to BRT and using existing rail line right of way along California Blvd. for route B. Stations would be equipped with automatic ticket dispensing machines to reduce delay and buses would be given traffic signal priority to increase speeds. This report concludes that some sort of additional public transportation system is needed and BRT would be a good fit for this county. The reasons for this are that a BRT system fits well with the population numbers of the county, would be less expensive to implement than a light rail, and could be operational within the near future.

Light Rail Transit in San Luis Obispo: A Plan for the Future, Thomas Preece (1985) Scope: City of San Luis Obispo This project looks at the need for better public transportation in the city of San Luis Obispo and examines the possibility of a light rail system for the city. There are three route options discussed and the option chosen as the best in the report is comprised of three phases. The first phase includes track that runs from Cal Poly, south along the existing tracks, right on Higuera St. which would be converted into a pedestrian mall, Madonna Rd., and stops at Madonna plaza. Phases two and three would add track to Los Osos Valley Rd. and Broad St. out to the airport. It was estimated that phase one would cost $13 million. The light rail proposed in this senior project is only intended for the city of San Luis Obispo and the track proposed would spend much of its length in mixed traffic so it is not exactly the type of county-wide rapid transit that this synthesis is trying to address. It does however stress a need for public transportation within the city and provides ideas on routes through the city for a future county-wide system.

For more information pertaining to these senior projects please contact: Professor Eugene Jud (805) 756-1729 ejud@calpoly.edu