Green Event Athens, Gazarte Frode Helland-Evebø Chief Sales & Marketing Officer September 27 th 2016
Why regulate emissions from ships? Automotive diesel contain 10-50ppm sulphur (EURO 5 and 4). HFO (3,5%) contain 35000 ppm sulphur!! MGO (0,1%) contain 1000pp sulphur! MDO (0,5%) contain 5000pp sulphur! 30 September 2016 2
MARPOL Annex VI chapter 3: requirements for control of emissions from ships Regulation 14 - Sulphur oxides and particulate matters Ratification Entered into force 19 th May 2005 Number of Contracting States: 87 (Sept. 26 th 2016) The combined merchant fleets of which constitute approximately 96,14% percent of the gross tonnage of world s merchant fleet Standards for the sulphur content of fuel oil used on ships IMO Designated Emission Control Areas (ECAs) 30 September 2016 3
Fuel oil availability study 30 September 2016 4
The decision making process Fuel availability study CE Delft Concludes that global cap of 0,5% sulfur may be introduced in 2020. Submitted OK! Study Approved! January 1st 2020 January 1st 2025 Consensus 2/3 majority voting to defer MEPC 70 24-28 October 2016 87 contracting states (MARPOL Annex VI) EU 28 states + USA + Canada + China, Representing 32, 2% Representing 33, 3% Representing 34,5% Representing > 35%
EU waters 2020 0,5% sulphur areas vs 2-5k TEU Container tracks
The business case for installing an EGCS Options for compliance with regulations: 1. Switch to distillate (MGO) pay the extra fuel bill 2. Install EGCS continue operation on HFO 3. Switch to other fuel types LNG, Optimal choice depend on: 1. How much the vessel will be trading in ECA (2020: EU, China, / Global trade ) 2. The power (MW) and fuel consumption of the vessel 3. Assumed price difference between MGO and HFO Payback (years) 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Price diff > 300 Price diff. < 300 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% ECA% Example: 10MW vessel trading in ECA and USD 200 fuel spread gives fuel cost = USD 2,3 mill./year EGCS price: USD 2,6 mill + Installation cost USD 0,8 mill = USD 3,4 mill. Payback 1,5 years
Clean Marine in brief Key description Clean Marine develop and supply exhaust gas cleaning systems ( EGCS ) for marine applications An EGCS removes environmentally harmful sulphur from the exhaust gas while allowing the vessel to use low-cost and readily available Heavy Fuel Oil (HFO) Founded in 2006 and HQ at Lysaker, Norway 23 employees with extensive experience within the maritime industry and process technology Global network of dedicated sales agents, network of site managers and fabrication & service In-house design, engineering and sourcing Fabrication fully outsourced and equipment assembled at the yard Installation and commissioning supervised by Clean Marine personnel on site Target customers are ship owners and shipyards Klaveness Invest AS Exhaust gas cleaning system Strong main owners Nanga Partnership L.P. BJARNE RIEBER GROUP AS Atlantis Vest / Flu AS 21% 38 % 34%
Successful innovation and commercialization Technology development phase Commercialization phase 2004 2004-8 2006 2009-11 2011-15 2012 2013 2014 2015 R&D started as part of the Torvald Klaveness Group The first 1 MW pilot was built and tested at the MAN laboratory facility in Holeby, Denmark Clean Marine founded as a separate company Extensive tests onboard Panamax tanker Baru for 10 MW EGCS; hybrid system with NaOH / water mix 0.6 MW demo and research installation at MARINTEK in Trondheim First order with Torvald Klaveness Group for retrofit of EGCS onboard dry bulk vessel Balder Three orders signed. Two with SHI for two 22MW tankers (owner AET) and one with HHI (owner Dorian LPG) Four orders signed. Two with Hudong (owner Stolt) and two with HMD (owner BP) Class approval granted, first three sales at sea and operating. Two orders signed Continuous technology development 34 Cumulative EGCS orders Employees 2 2 2 2 5 1 9 4 18 8 10 23 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Clean Marine offers an EGCS system with some unique features and important benefits to the ship owner Key benefits of the Clean Marine system 1 All exhaust streams cleaned in a single scrubber Cost efficient solution for vessels with many exhaust sources Easy to install Allstream 2 Hybrid system switch between open and closed loop Use closed loop mode when sailing in waters where discharge to sea is not allowed 3 Unique gas recirculation technology Maintaining pressure at desired levels at varying exhaust load Ensures no backpressure at engines and boilers Gas recirculation Hybrid system 4 Efficient operation in all types of seawater Adjustable injection of NaOH according to alkalinity of surrounding seawater 5 Scalable and flexible system Dimensioned according to highest practical exhaust load Can be installed both on new builds and retrofits
Ongoing projects /deliveries Client Hudong-Zhonghua Ship owner EF Transport Malta Ltd Project Supply Installation Commissioning & Sea trials BP/HMD 1&2 All major parts delivered EGC Units installed in Funnel block both units. Site Manager supervision. Cabling and final installation to be done. Stolt/Hudong 1&2 All major parts delivered Site Manager at Yard. Inlet section modification ongoing, Unit 1 installation to start shortly. EF Transport/Huanghai 1&2 Unit 1: Commissioning 01.Nov.2016 Sea trial 22-24.Nov.2016 Unit 2: Commissioning 20.Nov.2016 Sea trial 15-17.Dec.2016 TBA Expected late 2016 early 2017 for Unit 1. All major parts delivered Not yet started. TBA Expected late 2016 early 2017 for Unit 1.
Dorian Corvette - VLGC EGCS is fully certified Operational data from Dorian Corvette Client Owner Fully certified system System Size 16 MW Running hours ~ 2,000 Machinery connected 1xME, 3xAUX, 1xOFB connected to 1 EGCS. ECA Exposure 10-20 % System description Allstream and Hybrid Sea Water Flow 560 m3/h Max sulfur content in fuel used ~ 3.2% Power Consumption (max) 280 KW Achieved cleaning (sulfur equivalent) < 0.1% sulfur NaOH Consumption ~ 50 mt/year ph of washwater at outlet in open loop > 5.5 Cost of operation per year ~ 30 000 USD Trade Spot - world wide Savings per year ~ 180 000 USD
Eagle Barents / Bergen DP2 Shuttle Tanker EGCS is fully certified Operational data from Eagle Barents Client Owner Fully certified system System Size 22 MW Running hours ~ 14,000 Machinery connected 2xME, 5xAUX, 3xOFB connected to 1 EGCS. ECA Exposure 80% System description Allstream and Hybrid Sea Water Flow 900 m3/h Max sulfur content in fuel used ~ 3.0% Power Consumption (max) 400 KW Achieved cleaning (sulfur equivalent) < 0.1% sulfur NaOH Consumption ~ 300 mt/year ph of washwater at outlet in open loop > 5.5 Cost of operation per year ~ 170 000 USD Trade 10 Year TC for Statoil in North Sea and Norwegian Sea Savings per year ~ 1 200 000 USD
Milestones Clean Marine EGCS development Technology development phase Moving from initial R & D into incremental development Commercialization phase Gaining operational experience improving initial design further Developing the project execution organisation Mastering Korean Yard demands Working with different Class organisations Expanding the supplier base Standardisation and reuse of documents Improved cost and progress control ISSUES OBJECTIVES SOLUTIONS Efficiency and robustness No leakages No blockage Less maintenance Simpler to operate Optimized/simpler nozzle interface Internal vs external nozzle manifold (AVC) As is Material, fabrication and transport Space and installation Less man hours Less welding Less material and waste Less components More flexible Less foot print Straight vs cone sections Simpler exhaust inlet arrangement Welded vs flanged connetions Simpler supports and stiffening Modular EGC unit Optimized: Material Fabrication Transport Efficiency Robustness
Clean Marine EGCS today
Clean Mairne EGCS in the future?
What if? We split the unit
What if? Locate the units where it s space
What if? Redesign and optimize
Flexible EGCS in the near future
«Clean Flex»
Fuel and cost implications related to timing of EGCS installation given IMO 2020 0,5% sulphur cap Ordering, Delivery and Opperation of MR, LR1, LR2, Aframax tanker 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Ordering Delivery 1st Intermediate survey 1st Periodic survey (D. Docking) 1) LR1 tanker EGCS installed at delivery Cost = 0 mill USD EGCS installed, 3,0 Mill USD 12 months TC, 30% 30% ECA ECA EGCS + HFO HSHFO in ECA 100% HSHFO + EGCS 2) LR1 tanker EGCS installed at 1 st Intermediate survey Cost = 2 mill USD 30% ECA Fuel switch MGO HSHFO MGO in ECA EGCS installed, 3,8 Mill USD (Incl. Off-hire) 100% HSHFO + EGCS 3) LR1 tanker EGCS installed at Periodical survey Cost = 7 mill USD 30% ECA Fuel switch MGO HSHFO MGO in ECA 50% MGO and 50% LSHFO EGCS installed, 3,5 Mill USD Options: Costs USD/mt: EGCS + HSHFO 30 (EGCS Operation cost) LSHFO 125 (50% of MGO/MDO)?? MGO/MDO 250 Fuel Switch 0-250 Global 0,5% sulphur cap decision: 2020 Fuel availability study (CE Delft) concludes 2020. Implementation expected by IMO at MEPC 70 in October 16 Final date 2020 or 2025 to be decided latest by 2018, but most probably earlier
Guest of honour 30 September 2016 23
Thank you!