Sidewalk Management APWA San Clemente Sidewalk Management 1. Scope of Assignment

Similar documents
STANDARD DRAWING INDEX

COST ESTIMATES: Curb-Running

CATEGORY 500 PAVING SECTION 535 PAVEMENT SURFACE PROFILE

CAPITAL FUND 9510 STREET & SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS

BUS STOP DESIGN & PLANNING GUIDE

Parking Areas and Driveways for Single and Two Family Dwellings

The State of Michigan Transportation Asset Management Council 2005 PASER Survey Of Lapeer County

CITY OF PORTSMOUTH DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (DPW) DRIVEWAY RULES AND PROCEDURES

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS...

DESIGN STANDARDS SECTION DS 3 STREETS

EMERGING REQUIREMENTS

TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT STANDARDS CITY OF GARLAND TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT

POLICY AND PROCEDURE FOR SPEED HUMP INSTALLATION. Effective Date: July 10, 2013

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION FOR PAVEMENT RIDE QUALITY (MEAN ROUGHNESS INDEX ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA)

SECTION STREETS CITY OF LEE S SUMMIT, MISSOURI DESIGN CRITERIA

STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSAL BID ITEMS

TYPICAL DRIVEWAY CONSTRUCTION PER DOUGLAS COUNTY REGULATIONS AND POLICIES

Riverside County Transportation Department Summary of Bids

CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS STATEMENT OF QUANTITIES. Item No. Description Estimated Quantity

Smartphone based weather and infrastructure monitoring: Traffic Sign Inventory and Assessment

TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...1 INTRODUCTION...3 PROJECTED FUTURE GROWTH...3 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS...4 POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES...

Concrete Airport Pavement Workshop Right Choice, Right Now ACPA SE Chapter Hilton Atlanta Airport November 8, 2012

Dixie Transportation Planning Office

Pavement Management Program Report

ANDERSON PROPERTY SITE ANALYSIS

Regulatory Parking Signs Inventory and Parking Space Count RFP

APPLICATION FOR OBSTRUCTION PERMIT

Temporary Sales Trailer Application

ARTICLE 8 OFF-STREET PARKING AND PRIVATE DRIVEWAY STANDARDS

DIVISION 4: STREET. Improvement Design Standards City of Dundee Oregon. Division 4 : Street Page 1

CHAPTER 15 STREET LIGHTING TABLE OF CONTENTS

Recent Transportation Projects

AUTOMATED TRASH COLLECTION

a. A written request for speed humps must be submitted by residents living along the applicable street(s) to the Public Works Department.

CITY OF DAVIS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS

Public Works Right of Way Permit Application

Public Works Operations Manual Standard Operating Procedures for Water and Sewer WS - B311 Sanitary Sewer Connection Repair

800 Access Control, R/W Use Permits and Drive Design

Public Works Operations Manual Standard Operating Procedures for Water and Sewer WS-B111 Sewer Main Repair

SECTION 9 STORM SEWER INLETS

COUNTY ROAD SPEED LIMITS. Policy 817 i

CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS STATEMENT OF QUANTITIES. Item No. Description Estimated Quantity

CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... 2 II. SPEED HUMP INSTALLATION POLICY... 3 III. SPEED HUMP INSTALLATION PROCEDURE... 7 APPENDIX A... 9 APPENDIX B...

CITY OF OAKLAND INTRODUCTION

THORNTON ROAD WIDENING PROJECT NO. PW1428 B I D D I N G S C H E D U L E

FY 2013 Candidate Projects ($ Thousands) Street & Traffic Control Program - Thoroughfares

Brigham City 1200 West Box Elder Creek Bridge - Widening Project Type Reconstruction

SPEED HUMP POLICY. It is the policy of Hamilton Township to consider requests for speed humps as outlined below:

Bus Stop Optimization Study

ACTION TRANSMITTAL No

Performance-Based Communication Tools for Maintenance Budgets. 11th National Conference on Transportation Asset Management July 12th, 2016.

Parking Investigation / San Antonio UDC

DIXIE TIP CONCEPT REPORT APPLICATION FY 2015 (Due November 6, 2013) PROJECT INFORMATION

SUCCESSFUL PERFORMANCE PAVEMENT PROJECTS 2015 TxAPA Annual Meeting September 23, 2015 Austin District Mike Arellano, P.E. Date

Rolling Road (Route 638) Widening Project

2. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

NAU DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR DISABLED ACCESS PARKING AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AT VEHICULAR TRAFFIC AREAS

DIRECTIONAL DRIVEWAYS AT HIGHWAYS WITHOUT CURB

Engineering Report: Shasta-Trinity National Forest. Shasta McCloud Management Unit. Analysis of. National Forest System Road 37N79

COUNTY ROAD SPEED LIMITS. Policy 817 i

Digital Sidewalk Inspection. MEA Workshop Case Study

SPACE COAST AREA TRANSIT BUS STOP ACCESSIBILITY STUDY. Final Report

FRONT YARD PARKING ORDINANCES

MOBILITY AND ACCESSIBILITY IN OUR COMMUNITY

DESCRIPTION This work consists of measuring the smoothness of the final concrete or bituminous surface.

3. Application Fees, Certificate Of Insurance & Performance Bond

FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS Based on the 2012 edition of the International Fire Code

Successful Revenue Generators for Pavement Management and Pavement Preservation

Capital Improvement Plan

Table Standardized Naming Convention for ERD Files

3.1 Overview of ATCO Electric s URD System Design

I-290 Phase I Study Summary of NFPA-130 Analysis of Proposed CTA Station Platform Widths May 2016

Traffic Generation November 28, Mr. Todd Baker Baker Properties, LLC 953 Islington Street Suite 23D Portsmouth, NH 03801

Riverside County Transportation Department Summary of Bids

STREET LIGHTING ADOPTED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR

Subchapter 20 Transportation

Franklin County Engineer's Office - Highway Design ALKIRE RD & DEMOREST RD ROUNDABOUT CR NO. 11 & CR NO. 25 Bid Tabulation

Locating Ground Mounted Equipment

Engineering - Other Projects

Director s Message. July 3, Nazario Sauceda Director Bureau of Street Services

TXAPA Annual Short Course Galveston Texas

DRIVEWAY GUIDE. Transportation, Engineering and Development (T.E.D.) Business Group

Northeast Pavement Preservation Partnership Burlington, Vermont. Rhode Island DOT

Building a 21 st Century Electric Grid. February 23, 2018

ADDENDUM No. 1 Prospective Bidders

Modern Roundabouts. Understanding Your Design Vehicle. Friday, September 26, :30 AM-12:00 PM Session 5B

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda -- Public Hearing Item. PC Staff Report 5/23/16 TEXT AMENDMENT TO LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE; VALET PARKING (SLD)

Public Works Department, Capital Improvement Program Project Tracking

PARKING LOT REHABILITATION PROJECT FOR: SJRSC PALATKA CAMPUS

BIDDER'S PROPOSAL (continued) CITY OF BERKELEY BID PROPOSAL ITEM NO. A: BASE BID

Parks and Transportation System Development Charge Methodology

Driver Vehicle Inspection Reports

South Lexington Transportation Study Lexington, Massachusetts

MPO Staff Report Technical Advisory Committee: July 12, 2017

CITY OF FARMERSVILLE, TEXAS

HUMC/Mountainside Hospital Redevelopment Plan

CHAPTER 9: VEHICULAR ACCESS CONTROL Introduction and Goals Administration Standards

Project # & Name: # CDBG - Pugh Street Streetscape - East College Ave to East Beaver Ave & East Beaver Ave/Locust Lane Improvements

City of Houston Fondren Road Paving and Drainage

Lesson 1: Introduction to PowerCivil

Transcription:

Sidewalk Management APWA Congress 2006 Kansas City, Missouri Michael Robson September 12, 2006 Scope of Assignment Sidewalk Sidewalk Condition Evaluation Obstruction by Type ADA Ramp & Compliance Integrate Sidewalk Data with PMS Analyze the Sidewalk Integrate with GIS Sustainable Asset Management Framework Q1 Q2 Questions of Sustainable Asset Management What do we have? What is it worth? Sustainable Asset Management Activities Develop System Determine System Value Q3 What condition is it in? Determine Asset Condition Q4 What do we need to do to it? Develop O&M and Capital Work Projects Q5 When do we need to do it? Prioritize & Determine Work Schedule Q6 How much money do we need? Develop & Analyze Life Cycle Cost Profile Q7 How will we fund it? Develop Sustainable Funding Model San Clemente Sidewalk Management 1

Video AVI (Video) AVI to JPG JPG (Images) Field Surveys Production Stats Digital Video Real Time DGPS (Inertial) File Renaming/ Street Referencing Asset Extraction for Position/ Attributes ODBC Access Database (Data Model) ODBC QA/QC ArcMap 9.1 FME Create final Geometry and coordinate systems GPS GPS Correction GPS Post Processing (if required) External Data Sources - Ortho s - Centreline Files - Existing Data Final Deliverable / Check ArcMap 9.1 Digital Image Capture Digital Images Manual Supplement to Video GIS Manual Data Entry Screens San Clemente Sidewalk Management 2

Pilot Study Small Area Prove the Technical Approach Finalize the Survey Manual Survey Manual Development Is This Feature a Sidewalk? San Clemente Sidewalk Management 3

Sidewalk Types Sidewalk with Curb Adjacent (SCA) Sidewalk Types Sidewalk with Parkway Landscape (SPL) Sidewalk Types Sidewalk with Parkway Hardscape(SPH) San Clemente Sidewalk Management 4

Material Types Material Types Obstructions Fire Hydrants Street Lights Power Poles Utility Cabinets Trees Signs Walls Others San Clemente Sidewalk Management 5

Example Obstructions Condition Trip Hazards Faulting Smashed Slab Cracking ADA Ramps www.access-board.gov/adaag/html/adaag.htm San Clemente Sidewalk Management 6

ADA Types Landing Slope max. 2% Landing Dimensions min 4 wide x 4 deep Flare left or right Max 10% slope Ramp (pan) Slope max.8.33% Ramp Dimensions min 4 x4 min ADA Types Flare left or right Max 8.33% slope Ramp (pan) Slope max.2% Ramp Dimensions min 6 wide x 5 deep Sidewalk Condition Rating Scale Sidewalk Condition and Performance Very good Good Fair Poor Very poor A = (80-100) Excellent: No noticeable defects. Some aging or wear may be visible. B = (60-80) Good: Only minor deterioration or defects are evident. C = (40-60) Fair: Some deterioration or defects are evident, but function is not significantly affected. D = (20-40) Poor: Serious deterioration in at least some portion of the structure. Function is inadequate. F = ( 0-20) Failed: No longer functional. General failure or complete failure of a major structural component. San Clemente Sidewalk Management 7

Sidewalk Network Condition Rating 9% 5% 3% 3% 80% A Very Good B Good C Fair D Poor F Very Poor Sidewalk Condition by Functional Class Asset Type Asset Component Score Sidewalk Function class 0-100 Arterial - Major Primary 85 Arterial - Secondary 94 Collector Commercial /Industrial 87 Collector Residential 88 Local Commercial /Industrial 92 Local Residential 90 Unknown / Undefined N/A Overall Rating 89 Sidewalk Network By Functional Class 0.4% 50.0% 11.1% 7.1% 4.2% 1.9% 25.3% Unknown / Undefined Arterial - Secondary Collector - Residential Local Residential Arterial - Major Primary Collector - Commercial / Industrial Local Commercial / Industrial San Clemente Sidewalk Management 8

Asset Value Asset Type Value Sidewalks 4,378,000 sqft $ 63,874,253.00 ADA Ramps 1,515 ramps $ 6,162,300.00 Signs (partial survey) 5,280 signs $ 290,400.00 Sign Supports (partial) 3,812 $ 6,211,345.00 supports Pavement Network 158 miles $163,637,459.00 Total Asset Value $240,175,757.00 Backlog To Acceptability Asset Type Asset Component Bring up to Compliance/ Acceptability Sidewalks Trip Hazards 872 $239,505,00 Obstructions in existing Sidewalks Obstructions in Sidewalk Gaps Gaps in sidewalk network (complete one side of sidewalk network) 371 $4,227,250.00 6,375 $15,772,850.00 $9,838,478.70 ADA Ramps Non Compliant 593 $2,310,900.00 Roads Pavement Network $2,025,088. 00 Total Backlog $34,414,071.70 Sidewalk Network Statistics Asset Type Asset Component Area Centreline Mileage Sidewalks PCC 3740875 155.5 Red PCC 237381 7.2 Ole Hanson Tile 148764 6.6 Brick Pavers 116749 3.8 Asphalt 26268 0.9 Stamped Concrete 17446 0.5 Other 1417 0.0 Driveway only 89100 3.4 Total 4378000 177.9 San Clemente Sidewalk Management 9

APWA 2006 ADA Ramp Database Statistics Asset Component Asset Type ADA Ramps Type 1 Type 2 696 819 Total 1515 Sidewalk Network Value Asset Type Asset Component Sidewalks PCC Red PCC Ole Hanson Tile Brick Pavers Asphalt Stamped Concrete Other Driveway only Sub Total Sidewalks Cost Area $ / SQFT Val ue $ 3,740,875 237,381 148,764 116,749 26,268 17,446 1,417 89,100 4,378,000 $14.00 $52,372,250.00 $16.00 $3,798,096.00 $25.00 $18.00 $3,719,100.00 $2,101,482.00 $10.00 $262,680.00 Count $ / ADA ramp 696 819 1515 $4,500.00 $3,700.00 $3,132,000.00 $3,030,300.00 Total Value $ 70,036,553.20 ADA Ramps Type 1 Type 2 Sub Total ADA Ramps $20.00 $17.17 $348,920.00 $24,325.17 $14.00 $1,247,400.00 $63,874,253.17 $ $6,162,300.00 Sidewalk Obstructions Asset Type Asset Component Sidewalk Point Features In Existing Sidewalk Count Count FIRE HYDRANT TREE BOULDER 656 2018 75 187 89 0 PILASTER POWER POLE UTILITY CABINET SERVICE PEDESTAL 70 500 350 327 1 181 47 0 STREETLIGHT POLE SIGN SUPPORT TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE 423 1368 9 121 96 7 PARKING METER OTHER POSTS/POLES WALL TRAFFIC SIGNAL CABINET 51 97 139 0 13 4 34 0 STREET LIGHT PULL BOX GAP MAILBOX OTHER 0 216 412 815 0 216 127 28 Total Sidewalk Obstructions - Point 7526 1151 San Clemente Sidewalk Management 10

APWA 2006 Asset Type Asset Component Sidewalk Obstruction FIRE HYDRANT TREE BOULDER PILASTER POWER POLE UTILITY CABINET SERVICE PEDESTAL STREETLIGHT POLE SIGN SUPPORT TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE PARKING METER OTHER POSTS/POLES WALL TRAFFIC SIGNAL CABINET STREET LIGHT PULL BOX GAP MAILBOX OTHER Total Obstructions in Existing Sidewalk Asset Type Asset Component Trip Hazard Fault ¾ to 1 Fault 1" to 2" Fault > 2" Other Total Trip Hazards ADA Ramp Asset Type Sidewalks Cost Count Per Obstruction 187 89 $6,000.00 $1,000.00 $200.00 $400.00 $7,000.00 $15,000.00 $5,000.00 $7,000.00 $90.00 $14,000.00 $350.00 $90.00 $300.00 $45,000.00 $125.00 $250.00 $100.00 $300.00 1 181 47 121 96 7 13 4 34 216 127 28 371 Cost Per hazard 383 271 213 5 872 $60.00 $75.00 $900.00 $900.00 Non compliant 146 447 Total ADA Ramps 593 Asset Component Centreline Miles $1,122,000.00 $89,000.00 $0.00 $400.00 $1,267,000.00 $705,000.00 $0.00 $847,000.00 $8,640.00 $98,000.00 $4,550.00 $360.00 $10,200.00 $0.00 $0.00 $54,000.00 $12,700.00 $8,400.00 $4,227,250.00 Count Type 1 Type 2 Bring up to Compliance/ Acceptability Bring up to compliance/ acceptability $22,980.00 $20,325.00 $191,700.00 $4,500.00 $239,505.00 Per unit $4,500.00 $657,000.00 $3,700.00 $1,653,900.00 $2,310,900.00 Backlog Missing Sidewalk - one side of street Backlog missing Sidewalk entire network Function class Arterial - Major Primary Arterial - Secondary Collector Commercial/Industrial Collector - Residential Local Commercial/Industrial Local Residential Total Missing Links 14 $277,679.00 $2,608,199.19 7 $240,489.85 $1,502,441.74 5 $246,156.77 $1,186,511.04 30 3 $2,040,090.62 $260,324.06 $6,991,560.58 $584,400.96 75 $6,773,738.40 $17,957,047.68 134 $9,838,478.70 $30,830,161.19 San Clemente Sidewalk Management 11

Asset Type Asset Component Cost Overall Value ($) GAPS Point Obstructions Count Per Obstruction FIRE HYDRANT 469 $6,000.00 $2,814,000.00 TREE 1929 $1,000.00 $1,929,000.00 BOULDER 75 $200.00 $15,000.00 PILASTER 69 $400.00 $27,600.00 POWER POLE 319 $7,000.00 $2,233,000.00 UTILITY CABINET 303 $15,000.00 $4,545,000.00 SERVICE PEDESTAL 3 27 $5,000.00 $1,635,000.00 STREETLIGHT POLE 302 $7,000.00 $2,114,000.00 SIGN SUPPORT 1272 $90.00 $114,480.00 TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE 2 $14,000.00 $28,000.00 PARKING METER 38 $350.00 $13,300.00 OTHER POSTS/POLES 93 $90.00 $8,370.00 WALL 105 $300.00 $31,500.00 TRAFFIC SIGNAL 0 $45,000.00 $0.00 CABINET STREET LIGHT PULL 0 $125.00 $0.00 BOX GAP 0 $250.00 $0.00 MAILBOX 285 $100.00 $28,500.00 OTHER 787 $300.00 $236,100.00 Total Point Obstructions in Gaps 6375 $15,772,850.00 GAPS Linear Obstructions Linear ft Per Obstruction Wall 5520 $150.00 $828,000.00 Negative slope (requires 7542 $150.00 $1,131,300.00 infill) Positive slope (earth 104714 $150.00 $15,707,100.00 removal) Other 21279 $150.00 $3,191,850.00 Total Linear Obstructions in Gaps 139055 $20,858,250.00 Total Obstructions in Gaps $36,631,100.00 Recommendations Maintain Existing Data Schedule Regular Data Updates Establish Measurable Levels of Service Benchmarking Internal Comparisons Adjust Philosophy Questions San Clemente Sidewalk Management 12

Sidewalk Management APWA Congress 2006 Kansas City, Missouri Michael Robson September 12, 2006 San Clemente Sidewalk Management 13