CRANE STATISTICS & CASE STUDIES WSHC Safety Forum May 2009

Similar documents
FATAL AND SEVERE RISK PROGRAM

In This Document MODULE DESCRIPTION This module provides information on the safety concerns and

Cranes. OSHA Office of Training & Education 1

DGMS (Tech.) Circular No. 10 Dated Dhanbad the 19 th July, Safe use of mobile Cranes Code of practice

Newport News Shipbuilding Contractor Environmental, Health and Safety Resource Manual Cranes

And the Labour Law for the Private Sector promulgated by And Legislative Decree No.(36) of 2012, particularly Article (166) thereof,

Control, Safe Use and Operation of Road-Rail Plant

Driver Fatally Injured by Fall from Truck Date of Incident: March 5, 2007 Type of Incident: Fatality

MODEL CKE2500-II TON CAPACITY

OSH5063EP(PRS3607) Workplace and Work Equipment Hazard. Session 10. Lifting Operation

MSHA. Welcome to Spring Thaw 2016

Highway worker crushed by swinging backhoe boom

UNDER VEHICLE ACCESS SAFETY

For Review Only No Copying No Saving No Lending No Posting Online

Control, Safe Use and Operation of Excavators, Loaders and Earth Moving Equipment

1 Clearheart Construction Co., Inc. Mobile Crane - Onshore MOBILE CRANES Cranes and derricks

Parked forklift crushes operator against semi-trailer

Heavy Equipment & Rigging Specialist Training

British Columbia - Colombie-Britannique. Aerial Lift - Appareil de Levage

Element 3: Musculoskeletal Hazards and Risk Control

Electrical Safety in the Workplace

Accident Case Studies

MIFACE INVESTIGATION #06MI209

Technical Test Theory Lorry Loader A36

Great Western Painting Crane Operator - Offshore CRANE OPERATOR - OFFSHORE

Load Rating Charts C-Series Cranes 3001

Chicago Crane Operator Examination Study Guide

CRANE & HOIST SAFETY PROGRAM

Safe use of quick hitch devices on excavators. SIM 02/2007/01 Version 2. Target Audience: Construction Division Staff Construction Inspectors

Learning from Incident

Excavation worker killed by flying rigging when hook fails

Worker Crushed by Vessel Date of Incident: August 3, 2007 Type of Incident: Fatal

BOK SENG LOGISTICS TRENDS IN SINGAPORE AND SOUTH EAST ASIA S CRANE AND TRANSPORT SECTOR SPEAKER : VINCENT TEO & STEVEN TAN

CPCS renewal test factsheet

U.S. Department of Labor U.S. U.S. Department of Labor Mine Safety and Health Administration 1/18/17

Chicago Crane Operators Examination Study Guide

SAFETY IN USE OF MOBILE CRANES & EARTH MOVING EQUIPMENTS

LOLER REGULATIONS INTRODUCTION

Technical test - Theory. Appointed Person A61. No. Question Answers Max. Mark

Range Diagram and Lifting Capacity RT230. Cranes 30 TON LIFTING CAPACITY RANGE DIAGRAM 30' - 94' BOOM REDUCTION IN MAIN BOOM CAPACITY

Note: under no circumstances will a carbon tetrachloride extinguisher be used.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION Metal and Nonmetal Mine Safety and Health REPORT OF INVESTIGATION

Range Diagram and Lifting Capacity RT665. Cranes 65 TON LIFTING CAPACITY RANGE DIAGRAM 36' - 111' BOOM REDUCTION IN MAIN BOOM CAPACITY

Range Diagram and Lifting Capacity T Cranes. View thousands of Crane Specifications on FreeCraneSpecs.com RANGE DIAGRAM BOOM

Range Diagram and Lifting Capacity T Cranes RANGE DIAGRAM BOOM

Chevron s Fatality Prevention Team and Focus

SAFETY ALERT - # TOWING INCIDENT

40' ' POWERED BOOM: MODE 1 40' - 126' POWERED BOOM: MODE 2

Slinger/signaller Note: It is recommended that you read the Supporting Information page before you read this factsheet.

PROCEDURE. Operative Date: 22/12/2016 Department: HSEC. Revision: Author: D Steel CONTENTS

Operation of Fork Lift Trucks

7 Hazard assessment 8 Worker participation 9 Hazard elimination and control

LOAD CHART & RIGGING PRACTICE EXERCISES

ELECTRICAL SAFET Y FOR CONTRACTORS

Liftcrane Boom Capacities 2250 SERIES 3

Quarterly Stakeholder Call

Safety. Chapter 13 SAFETY PROGRAM GENERAL SAFETY RULES

4600 SERIES 3 RINGER SERIES 2. Manitowoc Cranes, Inc. Manitowoc, Wisconsin U.S.A.

Contents. Technical Test Practical. Crawler Crane Tower Crane

"CRANE SAFETY IN CONSTRUCTION ENVIRONMENTS"

Regulation Respecting Occupational Health and Safety. 1. Definitions: In this regulation, the following words and expressions mean:

Cranes. Range Diagram and Lifting Capacity RT TON LIFTING CAPACITY RANGE DIAGRAM 33' - 110' BOOM

Guidelines for Safety Training of Overhead Crane Operators and Supervisors

2.0 Reference: 4.0 Applicability: TRF WORKS. 5.0 Responsibility :Contractors, Drivers of the equipment, shift Supervisor/Officers. 6.

PRESENTER'S GUIDE "CRANE SAFETY" Part of the "SAFETY MEETING KIT" Series Quality Safety and Health Products, for Today...

Cranes. Range Diagram and Lifting Capacity RT345-1XL 45 TON LIFTING CAPACITY RANGE DIAGRAM 33.75' - 105' BOOM

LEVEL 1 MOBILE CRANE THEORY EXAM PRACTICE QUESTIONS

Rigging - Offshore OFFSHORE CRANES API RP 2D Operation and Maintenance of Offshore Cranes

WORKING WITH CRANES SAFELY

Table of Contents. Why An Occupational Health and Safety Program Demonstrating Commitment to Occupational Health and Safety... 1.

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE NUMBER

Cranes. Range Diagram and Lifting Capacity RT TON LIFTING CAPACITY RANGE DIAGRAM 40' - 126'

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE NUMBER

OVERHEAD & GANTRY CRANE / RIGGING

LINK-BELT MODEL HTC-8675LB - 75 TON CAPACITY 48 7" (.80m) 41 0" /8" (3.52m) /16" (2.02m) /4" (.34m) 25" 11 0" (.

T 775. truck crane 75 ton capacity. range diagram & lifting capacities. Range Diagram (40' - 126' boom)

Workplace Incident Fatalities Investigated in 2006

Lifting Capacities Pounds (30 94 boom)

GENERAL GUIDE FOR CRANES

Safe Driving Policy. 1. Objectives of the policy. 2. Code of conduct. 3. Responsibilities as an employee. Rev. Number 4 Page: Page 1 of 5

Cranes and Derricks. Objectives. Construction Safety Lecture 18

UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO

Employee Safety and Training Manual

Safe Driving Standards & Procedures

OSHA PART 1: PREPARING FOR THE SESSION. 1. Training Booklet. 2. Why This Session Is Important. 3. Purpose and Objectives of the Session

PURPOSE... 1 II. SCOPE... 2 III. REFERENCES... 2 IV. RESPONSIBILITIES...

CRANE OPERATION INSTRUCTION AND GUIDELINES

THE CRANE CORNER. Navy Crane Center Technical Bulletin

AVIATION INVESTIGATION REPORT A07C0148 COLLISION WITH POWER LINE TOWER

LS 278H. 250 ton (227 metric ton) Hydraulic Lattice Boom Crawler Crane. Tube Boom Capacities ft. ( m)

CPCS renewal test factsheet

Liftcrane Boom Capacities 999 SERIES 2. Manitowoc Cranes, Inc.

LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

Mine Hoist Hazards. The incidents over the past 10 years have been associated with causal factors such as, but not limited to:

GUIDANCE IN-SERVICE INSPECTION PROCEDURES

Crawler Tractor/Dozer A34

RT555 TEREX. rough terrain crane 55 ton capacity. range diagram & lifting capacities. Range Diagram ( boom) HOOK BLOCK WEIGHTS

Powered Mobile Equipment Rollover Safety Precautions Safety information for employers and workers

INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE CHECKLIST

OVERHEAD CRANE SAFETY:

Transcription:

CRANE STATISTICS & CASE STUDIES WSHC Safety Forum 2009 26 May 2009 CHAN Yew Kwong Deputy Director (Construction & Equipment Safety) Occupational Safety and Health Division

Number of Registered Cranes Overhead Crane 5,955 Lorry Loader 3,259 Gantry Crane 2,158 Crawler Crane 1,458 Mobile Crane (Truck/Wheel Mounted) 1,246 Tower Crane 541 Other Cranes 3,120 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000

Number of Registered Crane Operators Total 5, 962 Mobile Crane Operator 2, 734 Tower Crane Operator 1, 458 Crawler Crane Operator 1, 439 Dockside Tower Crane Operator 331

Crane-related related Workplace Incidents 150 No. of Workplace Incidents involving Cranes, 2007 and 2008 120 90 60 30 0 Workplace Fatalities (involving cranes) Non-Fatal Workplace Injuries (involving cranes) Dangerous Occurrence (DO) involving Collapse, Failure or Over-turning of Cranes 2007 4 107 17 2008 5 139 18

Year Crane-related Workplace Fatalities, 2006-2008 2006 (8 fatalities) 1 worker was struck by steel structures on a lorry crane which had lost its stability and toppled (CON) 1 worker fell into the excavation when he was guiding the hoisting process of a mobile crane (CON) 3 workers were killed, with another 3 injured in a ringer crane collapse (SSR) 1 worker fell over the barricades of a roof after being struck by a swaying concrete bucket lifted by a tower crane (CON) 2 workers were struck by steel plates while fell during the lifting operation of a mobile crane (LOG&T) 2007 (4 fatalities) 1 worker was thrown out of the lorry crane s bucket when the hydraulic pump of the crane ruptured and caused the boom to swing (LANDSCAPE) 1 worker was struck by a falling formwork component when it was hoisted by a mobile crane (CON) 1 worker was struck by a crane boom which gave way and collapsed (SSR) 1 worker was struck by the pre-cast concrete section when it was loaded onto a prime mover by a gantry crane (MFG) 2008 (5 fatalities) 1 worker was struck by a falling rebar when it was hoisted by an overhead travelling crane (MFG) 1 worker was struck by a metal pipe which swung towards him when it was hoisted by a gantry crane (MFG) 3 workers were killed in a tower crane collapse (CON)

CASE STUDY 1 : STEEL PLATES NO ENOUGH!

Incident Brief A crane operator moved the crawler crane from one location to another within the worksite. Operator raised the crane boom to a near maximum boom angle of 80 degree to avoid the nearby building and site office as the site was small. Crawler Crane boom tipped over backwards while it was being swung towards the front and the back of crawler crane began to sink.

Front Steel Plate Ground condition was soft due to the sunken hardcore. Steel plates were placed sparsely apart for crane s travel route. Only 2 steel plates were found under the crane s track.

Back Steel Plate Lifting supervisor and crane operator did not make a proper assessment of ground condition to ensure safe movement of the crane. In fact, there was no movement plan!

Findings of investigation Lack of competent person to ascertain ground condition safe for travel No requirement to have a movement plan for crane Wrong method of laying steel plates on soft ground

Steel plates must be placed closely together.

CASE STUDY 2 : NOBODY KNOWS THE WEIGHT!

Incident Brief 2A A main contractor was doing concreting for 2 columns. A mobile crane (truck mounted variable boom) was used to lift the filled concrete bucket to the column and then discharge the concrete. The concreting was done without any problem for the 1 st column. During the 3 rd lift for the 2 nd column, the crane toppled when the boom was reaching the column.

Scene of incident Column being casted

Outriggers fully extended

Outriggers on firm ground No ground failure

Findings of investigation The Lifting Supervisor mistakenly thought the load was 0.9 tons. He did not verify the load s weight. Crane Operator also did not know the load s weight, nor did he check the load chart before commencing the lifting operation. Crane Operator claimed that he did not hear the overload alarm sounded but only felt the crane toppled forward. Crane Operator obtained his licence only 4mths before the incident.

Crane toppled due to overloading : Load exceeded the crane s SWL, based on load chart.

Incident Brief 2B Lifting works involved moving sand from inside a storage tank to a sand pile for removal. The crane used was a wheel-mounted mobile crane (without prime mover) with variable boom length. After lunch, another crane operator took over to operate the crane. He proceeded to lift the bucket full of sand from inside a storage tank to the sand pile when the crane toppled forward.

Scene of incident Incident Scene

Outriggers fully extended Outriggers on Steel Plates & Firm Ground

Findings of investigation The lifting supervisor & both crane operators signed a lifting checklist, but the load s weight & working radius were wrong. When taking over control, 2 nd crane operator did not check the load s weight, crane capacity & verify the working radii of the crane. 2 nd crane operator heard the crane s overload indicator sounded but by then the crane had already started to topple forward. 2 nd crane operator obtained his license only 3mths before the incident.

Crane toppled due to overloading : Load exceeded the crane s SWL Sand Bucket

Systemic Problems of both Cases Crane operators do not follow basics of checking load s weight and crane s load chart before lifting. Lifting supervisors also did not verify the load s weight and crane s capacity for the required working radii, i.e. at pick-up and drop points. Over-reliance on safety devices like load radius indicator, overload alarm by lifting personnel to warn of unsafe conditions. They are not intended to take the place of load chart and lift planning.

SWL?? DON T BE THE NEXT ONE! Weight?? Working radius?? 2001 : crane operator ignored overload buzzer & continued to operate crane, resulting in crane s collapse. Fined $8,000 & registration was revoked. 2002 : crane operator ignored overload buzzer & continued to operate crane, resulting in boom s failure. Fined $15,000 & registration was revoked. Working radius?? Mobile crane

Crane operators must : Know or can calculate the weight of each load Always use the crane manufacturer s load chart & operation s manual provided for each crane language understood by operator Never use visual signs of tipping or overload alarm as an indicator of lift capacity. Follow strictly safe lifting practices, as well as manufacturer s procedures for safe operation of crane Never overload a crane by ignoring or bypassing the overload alarm - Install a data logger to deter such unsafe behaviour!

CASE STUDY 3 : NO RA & SWP!

Incident Brief Leader Piling operator & assistant pilling operator were instructed to lower the leader to check on a roller sheave located at the top of the leader. Stay Guy Line Outrigger Jack First they dismantled the right back stay cylinder from the chasis of the piling machine to placed it on the ground. Then they proceeded to dismantle the left back stay cylinder from the chasis to place it on the ground. Just as they were placing the left back stay cylinder on the ground, the piling machine toppled backwards. Hydraulic Piling Machine P&H 100P-80C(II)

Scene of incident

Findings of investigation Lack of Training - Workers are not formally trained on the method to lower the leader. No Supervision - Workers not supervised by a competent person during the process. No Method of Statement on the lowering of the leader Inadequate RA - Fail to identify and implement adequate control measures during the RA stage

CASE STUDY 4 : 15 MAR 2008, NEW YORK CITY 7 FATALITIES

How the Crane Fell The collapse was initiated when the polyester web slings supporting a steel collar at the 18th floor level failed, allowing the collar to fall.

Main Findings of Investigation* Improper usage of the polyester web slings resulted in the failure of the slings : > the no of supports provided by the slings did not meet the crane manufacturer s requirements only half of the required eight supports were used. > the positioning of the slings on the collar as installed was inconsistent with the crane manufacturer s instructions. > the method of attaching the slings to the tower was not in accordance with accepted industry practice & standards. > one of the slings had been previously used rendering its condition such that its load capacity would have been reduced. * Extracted from 51 st Street Crane Investigation Report by Ove Arup & Partners

Management of Safe Lifting Operations Lifting Plan including Risk Assessment PTW Tower Crane 1 Lifting Supervisor Crane Operator Rigger(s) Signalmen

Flow Chart of Lifting Operation Lifting Plan including Risk Assessment PTW

Flow Chart of Permit-To-Work system for Lifting Operation APPLY ASSESS & INSPECT The application, containing the written lifting plan, shall be given to the worksite s appointed safety assessor for evaluation of the lifting operation assess whether all reasonably practicable measures have been taken inspect the site (including its surroundings) where the lifting operation is to be carried out together with the supervisor APPROVE MONITOR COMPLETED ensure that the measures are in place at all times during the validity period of the PTW continually review the progress of the lifting operation REVOKE

Management of Safe Lifting Operations Lifting Plan including Risk Assessment Lifting Plan including Risk Assessment Lifting Plan including Risk Assessment Maintenance Regime of lifting eqpt PTW PTW PTW Tower Crane 1 Tower Crane 2 Mobile Crane 1 Lifting Supervisor Crane Operator Rigger(s) Signalmen Lifting Supervisor Crane Operator Rigger(s) Signalmen Lifting Supervisor Crane Operator Rigger(s) Signalmen

Crane A Manufacturer s Operation & Maintenance Manual Crane A Maintenance & Operation Logs

Management of Safe Lifting Operations Lifting Safety Engineer Lifting Plan including Risk Assessment Lifting Plan including Risk Assessment Lifting Plan including Risk Assessment Maintenance Regime of lifting eqpt PTW PTW PTW Competencies of lifting personnel Tower Crane 1 Tower Crane 2 Mobile Crane 1 Lifting Supervisor Crane Operator Rigger(s) Signalmen Lifting Supervisor Crane Operator Rigger(s) Signalmen Lifting Supervisor Crane Operator Rigger(s) Signalmen Follow Safe Work Practices

We need to keep moving the bar up : that is what SAFETY is all about. You never get it cracked. We shouldn t have any tower crane incidents. Some people might say that this is almost impossible. I understand that, but we need to keep moving the bar up. John Spanswick Chairman, Bovis Land Lease