June 5, In Reply Refer To: HSSD/B-178. Mr. Kevin K. Groeneweg Mobile Barriers LLC Genesee Trail Road Golden, CO Dear Mr.

Similar documents
July 17, In Reply Refer To: HSSD/B-176A

June 27, In Reply Refer To: HSSD/B-176

February 8, In Reply Refer To: HSSD/CC-104

April 22, In Reply Refer To: HSA-10/WZ-206. Mr. Jan Miller TrafFix Devices 220 Calle Pintoresco San Clemente, California Dear Mr.

(Item 1) PSS - Type III barricade with a lightweight light attachment, and with a variation in the panel spacing;

July 10, Refer to: HSA-10/CC-78A

Mr. Dave Gertz Director of Engineering TrafFix Devices, Inc. 220 Calle Pintoresco San Clemente, California Dear Mr. Gertz:

November 16, 1998 Refer to: HNG-14. Mr. David Allardyce Mechanical Engineer B&B Electromatic Main Street Norwood, Louisiana 70761

Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware

SUMMARY CHANGES FOR NCHRP REPORT 350 GUIDELINES [NCHRP (02)] Keith A. Cota, Chairman Technical Committee on Roadside Safety June 14, 2007

STI Project: Barrier Systems, Inc. RTS-QMB Longitudinal Barrier. Page 38 of 40 QBOR1. Appendix F (Continued) Figure F-3

A MASH Compliant W-Beam Median Guardrail System

Appendix D. Figure D-1. ENCLOSURE 1 (4 Pages) SafeGuard TM Gate System

VULCAN BARRIER TL-3 GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS

MASH 2016 Implementation: What, When and Why

VULCAN BARRIER TL-3 GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS

Implementation of AASHTO s Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) 2016

BarrierGate. General Specifications. Manual Operations General Specifications

Crash Testing Growth Common Roadside Hardware Systems Draft FHWA and AASHTO Requirements for Implementing MASH 2015

AASHTO Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware, AASHTO/FHWA Joint Implementation Plan Standing Committee on Highways September 24, 2015

Advances in Simulating Corrugated Beam Barriers under Vehicular Impact

1962: HRCS Circular 482 one-page document, specified vehicle mass, impact speed, and approach angle for crash tests.

VERIFICATION & VALIDATION REPORT of MGS Barrier Impact with 1100C Vehicle Using Toyota Yaris Coarse FE Model

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

Product Specification. ABSORB 350 TM TL-2 Non-Redirective, Gating, Crash Cushion Applied to Quickchange Moveable Barrier

Evaluation and Design of ODOT s Type 5 Guardrail with Tubular Backup

Development and Validation of a Finite Element Model of an Energy-absorbing Guardrail End Terminal

Form DOT F (8-72) Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

FALSE CLAIMS ACT COMPLAINT QUI TAM

Universal TAU-IIR Redirective, Non-Gating, Crash Cushion

Safe-Stop TMA (Truck Mounted Attenuator) GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS

NCHRP Report 350 Test 4-12 of the Modified Thrie Beam Guardrail

PRODUCT & INSTALLATION MANUAL RICOCHET SAFETY BARRIER SYSTEM TL2 MASH 1

PART 665 BUS TESTING. Subpart A General. 49 CFR Ch. VI ( Edition)

MASH08 TEST 3-11 OF THE ROCKINGHAM PRECAST CONCRETE BARRIER

Development of Combination Pedestrian-Traffic Bridge Railings

Assessing Options for Improving Roadside Barrier Crashworthiness

Midwest Guardrail System Without Blockouts

VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM

CRASH TEST AND EVALUATION OF 3-FT MOUNTING HEIGHT SIGN SUPPORT SYSTEM

MASH TEST 3-37 OF THE TxDOT 31-INCH W-BEAM DOWNSTREAM ANCHOR TERMINAL

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE of Transportation Washington, D.C

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

SAFETY PERFORMANCE OF WORK-ZONE DEVICES UNDER MASH TESTING

safedirection.com.au Ref: PM 017/02

MASH Test 3-11 on the T131RC Bridge Rail

ALPHA 70K TMA (Truck Mounted Attenuator) GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS

Petition for Rulemaking; 49 CFR Part 571 Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Rear Impact Guards; Rear Impact Protection

Toyota Motor North America, Inc. Grant of Petition for Temporary Exemption from an Electrical Safety Requirement of FMVSS No. 305

Technical Report Documentation Page

CRASH TESTING OF RSA/K&C ANTI-RAM FOUNDATION BOLLARD PAD IN ACCORDANCE WITH U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE DIPLOMATIC SECURITY SD-STD-02.

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

Safety Barrier System Conditions

MASH TEST 3-11 OF THE TxDOT T222 BRIDGE RAIL

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

StopGate TM Barrier Arm GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS

GUARDRAIL TESTING MODIFIED ECCENTRIC LOADER TERMINAL (MELT) AT NCHRP 350 TL-2. Dean C. Alberson, Wanda L. Menges, and Rebecca R.

ArmorGuard Barrier Portable Longitudinal Barrier

Reference Number: SMS-4211-L1, Rev 0 Date: May 2, 2018

Virginia Department of Transportation

MASH TEST 3-10 ON 31-INCH W-BEAM GUARDRAIL WITH STANDARD OFFSET BLOCKS

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE THE TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77843

MASH TEST 3-11 OF THE TxDOT SINGLE SLOPE BRIDGE RAIL (TYPE SSTR) ON PAN-FORMED BRIDGE DECK

Technical Report Documentation Page Form DOT F (8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorized

TRACC. Trinity Attenuating Crash Cushion

DEVELOPMENT OF A MASH TL-3 MEDIAN BARRIER GATE

W-Beam Approach Treatment at Bridge Rail Ends Near Intersecting Roadways

Guide Rail Safety Symposium

MASH TEST 3-21 ON TL-3 THRIE BEAM TRANSITION WITHOUT CURB

ArmorGuard Barrier Portable Longitudinal Barrier

Pupil Transportation Safety

ROBUST PROJECT Norwegian Public Roads Administration / Force Technology Norway AS

REPORT NO. TR-P NC SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 223 REAR IMPACT GUARDS 2007 TRANSFREIGHT TECHNOLOGY NHTSA NO.

NCHRP Report 350 Crash Testing and Evaluation of the S-Square Mailbox System

Technical Report Documentation Page 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 1. Report No. FHWA/TX-09/

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Parts and Accessories Necessary for Safe Operation; Grant of Exemption For HELP Inc.

CRASH TEST REPORT FOR PERIMETER BARRIERS AND GATES TESTED TO SD-STD-02.01, REVISION A, MARCH Anti-Ram Bollards

RCAR Bumper Test. Issue 2.1. February 2018

Methodologies and Examples for Efficient Short and Long Duration Integrated Occupant-Vehicle Crash Simulation

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Sumitomo Rubber Industries, Ltd., Receipt of Petition for. AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),

Evaluation of the Midwest Guardrail System Stiffness Transition with Curb

Weight Allowance Reduction for Quad-Axle Trailers. CVSE Director Decision

CRASH TEST OF MILE POST MARKER. T. J. Hirsch Research Engineer. and. Eugene Buth Assistant Research Engineer. Research Report Number 146-8

GENERAL SPECIFICATION

Roadside Safety MASH

MINIMUM EFFECTIVE LENGTH FOR THE MIDWEST GUARDRAIL SYSTEM

TITLE 16. TRANSPORTATION CHAPTER 27. TRAFFIC REGULATIONS AND TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES

Collect similar information about disengagements and crashes.

CRASH TEST AND EVALUATION OF TEMPORARY WOOD SIGN SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR LARGE GUIDE SIGNS

CRASH TEST REPORT FOR PERIMETER BARRIERS AND GATES TESTED TO SD-STD-02.01, REVISION A, MARCH Anti-Ram Bollards

Analysis of Existing Work-Zone Sign Supports Using Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware Safety Performance Criteria

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE PERMANENT NEW JERSEY SAFETY SHAPE BARRIER UPDATE TO NCHRP 350 TEST NO (2214NJ-2)

IMPORTANT SAFETY RECALL

E/ECE/324/Rev.1/Add.57/Rev.2/Amend.4 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.1/Add.57/Rev.2/Amend.4

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE THE TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77843

Crash Performance of Strong-Post W-Beam Guardrail with Missing Blockouts Carolyn E. Hampton and Hampton C. Gabler

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE MODIFIED G4(1S) GUARDRAIL UPDATE TO NCHRP 350 TEST NO WITH 28" C.G. HEIGHT (2214WB-2)

Evaluation of Barriers for Very High Speed Roadways

Certification of Aircraft Seating Design Changes

Transcription:

June 5, 2008 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE. Washington, DC 20590 In Reply Refer To: HSSD/B-178 Mr. Kevin K. Groeneweg Mobile Barriers LLC 24918 Genesee Trail Road Golden, CO 80401 Dear Mr. Groeneweg: This letter is in response to your request for Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) acceptance of a roadside safety device for use on the National Highway System (NHS). Name of device: Mobile Barrier Trailer Type of device: Portable Work Zone Barrier Test Level: NCHRP Report 350 Test Level 2 (TL-2) or TL-3 Testing conducted by: Southwest Research Institute Date of request: April 28, 2008 Dates of follow-up: May 28, 2008 and June 3, 2008. You requested that we find this device acceptable for use on the NHS under the provisions of National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 350 Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features and the proposed American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware 2008 (MASH-08). Requirements Roadside safety devices should meet the guidelines contained in the NCHRP Report 350, "Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features". FHWA Memorandum ACTION: Identifying Acceptable Highway Safety Features of July 25, 1997, provides further guidance on crash testing requirements of longitudinal barriers. You have also chosen to anticipate the adoption of MASH-08, an option that FHWA has offered with the understanding that additional testing may need to be done if changes to the test criteria are made before MASH-08 is formally adopted. Description The Mobile Barrier Trailer (MBT) is an integrated, rigid wall, semi-trailer that is used in conjunction with standard semi-tractors to provide mobile, improved, safety, and work environments for personnel at applicable maintenance, construction, and security sites. It is an extended, mobile, longitudinal barrier that provides a physical and visual wall between passing

2 traffic and the maintenance and construction personnel. With an integrated crash attenuator at the rear, a semi-tractor at the front, and a rigid wall on the side toward passing traffic, the MBT will provide approximately 30.5 m (100 ft) of barrier and protected work area. The basic trailer is comprised of two platforms and up to three wall sections. The platforms are each 6.4 m (21 ft) in overall length, 2.54 m (100 in) wide and 1.22 m (4 ft) high (riding approximately 1.52 m (5 ft) high with 305 mm (12 in) of ground clearance). The wall sections are each 6.10 m (20 ft) long, 610 mm (24 in) wide, and 1.22 m (4 ft) high (riding approximately 1.52 m (5 ft) high with 305 mm (12 in) of ground clearance). A homogenous 6.4 mm (0.25 in) steel plate is welded to cover the outer side of each wall section. Each wall section abuts up against another of the platforms and is built the same to take an impact from either direction. There are no snag points at the seams. The outer 6.4 mm (0.25 in) plate and associated welds are ground beveled to transition from one to the other. Dimensioned illustrations of the trailer are enclosed for reference as Appendix A. Crash Testing One full-scale crash test was conducted using a 2329 kg Dodge Ram quad cab pickup truck impacting at 23.5 degrees at 102.3 km/hr. The MBT deflected 0.61m (2 ft) during the impact. As seen in the enclosed test data summary sheet the evaluation criteria were within the limits specified in MASH-08. Findings Therefore, the MBT described above and detailed in the enclosed dimensioned photographs is acceptable for use on the NHS under the range of conditions tested, when allowed by a highway agency. It will be acceptable for TL-2 or TL-3 usage depending on the test level of the Truck Mounted Attenuator that is affixed to the rear. You subsequently requested that FHWA accept the MASH-08 Test 3-11 as indicative of the NCHRP Report 350 acceptance as well. Because the nature of the MBT device and the impact performance of the MASH-08 pickup truck we can conclude that the MASH-08 Test 10 and the NCHRP Report 350 Tests 10 and 11 can be waived. (The MBT is a semi-rigid vertical wall with relatively low friction characteristics that can be favorably compared to vertical concrete barrier walls that passed prior full-scale testing). Please note the following standard provisions that apply to the FHWA letters of acceptance: This acceptance is limited to the crashworthiness characteristics of the devices and does not cover their structural features, nor conformity with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Any changes that may adversely influence the crashworthiness of the device will require a new acceptance letter. Should the FHWA discover that the qualification testing was flawed, that in-service performance reveals unacceptable safety problems, or that the device being marketed is significantly different from the version that was crash tested, we reserve the right to modify or revoke our acceptance.

3 You will be expected to supply potential users with sufficient information on design and installation requirements to ensure proper performance. You will be expected to certify to potential users that the hardware furnished has essentially the same chemistry, mechanical properties, and geometry as that submitted for acceptance, and that it will meet the crashworthiness requirements of the FHWA and the NCHRP Report 350. To prevent misunderstanding by others, this letter of acceptance is designated as number B-178 and shall not be reproduced except in full. This letter and the test documentation upon which it is based are public information. All such letters and documentation may be reviewed at our office upon request. The MBT is a patented product and considered proprietary. If proprietary devices are specified by a highway agency for use on Federal-aid projects, except exempt, non-nhs projects, they: (a) must be supplied through competitive bidding with equally suitable unpatented items; (b) the highway agency must certify that they are essential for synchronization with the existing highway facilities or that no equally suitable alternative exists; or (c) they must be used for research or for a distinctive type of construction on relatively short sections of road for experimental purposes. Our regulations concerning proprietary products are contained in Title 23, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 635.411. This acceptance letter shall not be construed as authorization or consent by the FHWA to use, manufacture, or sell any patented device for which the applicant is not the patent holder. The acceptance letter is limited to the crashworthiness characteristics of the candidate device, and the FHWA is neither prepared nor required to become involved in issues concerning patent law. Patent issues, if any, are to be resolved by the applicant. Sincerely yours, Enclosures David A. Nicol, P.E. Director, Office of Safety Design Office of Safety FHWA:HSSD:NArtimovich:tb:x61331:6/4/08 File: s://directory folder/nartimovich/b178-mobilebarriertrailerfin.doc cc: HSSD (Reader, HSA; Chron File, HSSD; N.Artimovich, HSSD; M.McDonough, HSSD)

APPENDIX A Test Article (Contents of Appendix A submitted by Mobile Barriers LLC) A-I

Overview View as assembled with three wall sections Shortened configuration prepared for transport w/ wall sections atop combined platforms. Overall trailer length (with 3 wall sections): 102' Overall length (with platforms only as shown above - no wall sections installed): 42' ~engths exclusive of tractor & TMA assembly, not shown) Width: 100" Approx Weight: 65,000 lbs with tractor and misc accompaniments Breakdown: Platforms and rear axel assembly ("caboose") - 20,000 lbs Wall sections - 5,000 lbs (ea) Counterweight - 5,000 lbs per wall section Tractor and accompaniments - 20,000 lbs Clearance: 9-12" (+/ - 1") depending on configuration Height to top of platforms (as taped): approx. 5' (58" with 12" of clearance) Height to top of visual barrier (netting) or wall sections as stored above: approx 9' A-2

Overview (cont)... Length of platforms (2 shown attached): 21' ea ("caboose" or rear axel assembly under platform opposite tractor) Length of wall sections (2 shown facing/ion opposite side): 20' ea. Configuration options: Platform and caboose with 0-3 wall sections Must be used with an NCHRP Report 350 compliant TMA that has been tested and accepted at TL-3 or such other level as appropriate for applicable traffic speeds and deployment conditions (TMA not shown). A-3

Dimensions... Overall length with 3 wall sections: 102' 2 Platforms (21' ea) 1 2 3 Wall sections (20' ea) 1 2 3 A-4

Dimensions (cont)... Trailer & Caboose (rear axel assembly) as seen from rear traffic side - wheel cover panel and TMA not shown. (license plate and splashguards blacked out) 100" Width Caboose (rear axel assembly) 46" Wall/Platfonn height 9-12" Clearance A-5

Wall construction... y Wall sections 1,2,3 - Assembled Top, mid, and lower beams with lower channel - 46" height (55-58" overall height wi 9-12" clearance) Preassembly as seen on end A-6

Platform Construction... "- -- 1 ~ 42' ~ Platforms connected and loaded for transport, shown open from work side. ---.-I... :..,: I; """"",,,,,,Iiiib'"""'~-= Skeletal view. A-7

Table 4.1- Summary of Test Results and Conditions..I. N VJ 0, N -.) General Information Test Agency Southwest Research Institute Test Number MBT-l Tes.tDate 04/03/2008 Test Category Test Article 3-11 "Update" Type Longitudinal Barrier Installation Length 30.5 m (100 ft) Top-of-Barrier Height 1.52 m (5 ft) Type of Primary Barrier Mobile longitudinal barrier Soil Test Vehicle Test performed on concrete Type '/2Ton Quad Cab Pickup Designation 2270P Mode1 2002 Dodge Ram 1500 Quad Cab Mass (kg) 2329 Inertial Mass(kg) 2329 Dummy Mass (kg) NA Gross Static Mass (kg) 2329 Impact Conditions Speed (km/hr) 102.3 Test Article Deflection Dynamic 0.61 m (2.0 ft) Angle (degrees) 23.5 Static 9.5 cm (3.8 in) Exit Conditions Vehicle Damage Speed (km/hr) 80 (calculated) Exterior Angle (degrees) 0 CDC 11LFEW5 Occupant Risk Values VDS 11-LFQ-4 Impact Velocity (m/s) Interior x-direction....4.0 OCDI...LFOOOOOOO y-direction.-6.4 Max. Deform. (mm) 0 Ridedown Accelerations (g's) x-direction 7.9 y-direction 11.1 Post Impact Vehicular Behavior (limited to events <1.000 seconds) Maximum Roll Angle (degrees) 7.8 @ 0.107 sec. Maximum Pitch Angle (degrees) 2.3 @ 0.447 sec. Maximum Yaw Angle (degrees) 29.3 @ 0.374 sec.,4j.3iii(227.5 rt 2 4-9.1 1'1(30 ft) F.itB..