RE: 3605 Paul Anka Drive Addendum #2 to the December 2012 Traffic Impact Study

Similar documents
The Re:Queen and Sparks Traffic Brief - Addendum #2

Re: Sainte-Geneviève Elementary School (2198 Arch Street) Transportation Overview

Re: 233 Armstrong Street Residential Condominium Traffic Brief

Re: Cyrville Road Car Dealership

Table 1 - Land Use Comparisons - Proposed King s Wharf Development. Retail (SF) Office (SF) 354 6,000 10, Land Uses 1

Re: Residential Development - Ogilvie/Cummings Transportation Overview

700 Hunt Club Road. Transportation Impact Study - Addendum #1. Submitted by:

370 Queen Elizabeth Drive Transportation Overview

April Salvation Army Barrhaven Church 102 Bill Leathem Drive Transportation Brief

RE: Taggart Retail Site Plan: Kanata West Proposal for Traffic Impact Study: Addendum #2

Provide an overview of the development proposal including projected site traffic volumes;

267 O Connor Street Residential Development

Wellington Street West

Re: Addendum No. 4 Transportation Overview 146 Mountshannon Drive Ottawa, Ontario


MEMO. McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION. File FROM: Keyur Shah DATE: February 1, 2010 COPIES: OUR FILE: SUBJECT: TO:

Ref. No Task 3. April 28, Mr. Cesar Saleh, P. Eng. VP Planning and Design W.M. Fares Group th

CENTRAL VIRGINIA LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN. Appendix F

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

1012 & 1024 McGarry Terrace

1140 Wellington Street West Transportation Brief

700 Hunt Club Road. Transportation Impact Study. Submitted by:

Bennett Pit. Traffic Impact Study. J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado. March 3, 2017

CitiGate Retail Development

L1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY Prepared for:

Proposed Hotel and Restaurant Development

APPENDIX G. Traffic Data

Appendix H: Construction Impacts H-2 Transportation

MEMO. McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION. File Mark VanderSluis, Keyur Shah DATE: October 26, 2009 COPIES: OUR FILE: TO: FROM: Jack Thompson

MEMORANDUM. Date: November 4, Cheryl Burrell, Pebble Beach Company. Rob Rees, P.E. Inclusionary Housing Transportation Analysis WC

Traffic Impact Analysis Farmington Center Village

RE: 67/71 Marquette Avenue Redevelopment Transportation Overview

Ingraham High School Parking and Traffic Analysis

RE: A Traffic Impact Statement for a proposed development on Quinpool Road

One Harbor Point Residential

April 7, Mr. Blake Shutler Compass Homes Development LLC Summit Homes Construction, LLC PO Box 6539 Dillon, CO 80435

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION

Traffic Impact Study Hudson Street Parking Garage MC Project No.: A Table of Contents

Paisley & Whitelaw - Paisley Park OPA / ZBA for Mixed Density Residential Use

Oakbrook Village Plaza City of Laguna Hills

(A) Project Manager, Infrastructure Approvals

Barrhaven Honda Dealership. Dealership Drive, Ottawa, ON. Transportation Brief

MURRIETA APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF MURRIETA, CALIFORNIA

RESPONSE TO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMMENTS

BUCKLEY ANNEX REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS ADDENDUM

Minto Mahogany Stage 2

JRL consulting. March Hartland Developments Limited 1993 Hammonds Plains Road Hammonds Plains, NS B4B 1P3

ARVADA TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Rockingham Ridge Plaza Commercial Development Halifax Regional Municipality

Proposed Pit Development

Traffic Impact Study Proposed Commercial Development Ballwin, Missouri. Technical Memorandum for Traffic Impact Study

County State Aid Highway 30 (Diffley Road) and Dodd Road Intersection Study

CastleGlenn Consultants Inc.

Freeway Weaving and Ramp Junction Analysis

Prepared For: Toronto Transit Commission 1138 Bathurst Street Toronto, Ontario M5R 3H2. Prepared By:

Traffic Impact Analysis Update

Downtown One Way Street Conversion Technical Feasibility Report

Wellings Communities Holding Inc and Extendicare (Canada) Inc Hazeldean Road. Transportation Impact Study. Ottawa, Ontario. Project ID

Appendix B: Traffic Reports

Sugarland Crossing Gwinnett County, Georgia

886 March Road McDonald's Transportation Study

Weaver Road Senior Housing Traffic Impact Analysis

Traffic Impact Study Morgan Road Commerce Park Pasco County, Florida

Village of Richmond Transportation Brief

Parking/Traffic Assessment Study

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017

Lakeside Terrace Development

Traffic Impact Study. Eastern Springs. A Proposed Development in Manorville, NY. April Haas Group Inc Transportation Planners and Engineers

JOHNSON RANCH RAPID CITY, SOUTH DAKOTA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Trim Road, Commercial Development, City of Ottawa

June 21, Mr. Jeff Mark The Landhuis Company 212 North Wahsatch Avenue, Suite 301. Colorado Springs, CO 80903

November 1, Mr. Jafar Tabrizi President, Tabrizi Rugs 180 Bedford Highway. Traffic Impact Statement BH-1 and BH-2, Southgate Drive, Bedford, NS

10 th Street Residences Development Traffic Impact Analysis

This letter summarizes our observations, anticipated traffic changes, and conclusions.

Addendum to Traffic Impact Analysis for Port Marigny Site Mandeville, LA

Trip Generation Study: Provo Assisted Living Facility Land Use Code: 254

Aldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering

1. INTRODUCTION 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION CUBES SELF-STORAGE MILL CREEK TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON

Proposed Office Building Traffic Impact Study Chicago Avenue Evanston, Illinois

Salvini Consulting Inc. 459 Deer Ridge Drive Kitchener, ON N2P 0A November 8, 2017 Revised December 20, 2017

Date: December 20, Project #:

APPENDICES. APPENDIX D Synchro Level of Service Output Sheets

Vanier Parkway and Presland Road Residential Development Transportation Impact Study

KUM & GO 6400 WESTOWN PARKWAY WEST DES MOINES, IOWA 50266

Half Moon Bay North Apartment Block Transportation Impact Assessment. Full Report. March 15, Prepared for: Mattamy Homes.

1701 N. BEAUREGARD STREET NEW WEST END ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (NWEES)

TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

STANDARD LIMITATIONS

Memorandum. 1 Short List Analysis Background. James Hinkamp and Tony Coe, City of Lafayette Steering Committee

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. USD #497 Warehouse and Bus Site

Aldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering

770 SOMERSET STREET RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT

Appendix J Traffic Impact Study

Craig Scheffler, P.E., PTOE HNTB North Carolina, P.C. HNTB Project File: Subject

LATSON INTERCHANGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES. Genoa Township, Livingston County, MI

6111 and 6141 Hazeldean Road Stittsville, Ontario. Proposed Residential Development Transportation Impact Study

DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY 1627 MAXIME STREET CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: Subhas Bhargava. July 9, Overview_1.

Per Revised Concept Plan Residential Condo/Townhouse. Proposed Land Use per TIS

Winnetka Avenue Bike Lanes Traffic Impact Analysis

Transcription:

19 May 2015 BY EMAIL: asaggarwal@gmail.com Manor Park Management 231 Brittany Drive, Suite D Ottawa, ON K1K 0R8 Attention: Mr. Anand Aggarwal RE: 3605 Paul Anka Drive Addendum #2 to the December 2012 Traffic Impact Study 1. INTRODUCTION From the information provided, we understand you will be pursuing a Rezoning and Site Plan Application for a development proposal on the above-noted site located just south of Hunt Club Road. We are advised that the intent is to now pursue a 99-suite extended stay hotel instead of the previously proposed 69 unit apartment building. The current Site Plan is depicted in Figure 1. In discussing this file with Wally Dubyk of the City, he is aware of the traffic issues in the immediate area, potentially due to recent development of the adjacent sites, and the City has recently installed speed bumps on Dean Martin Crescent to slow traffic, and a curb extension on Paul Anka at its Wisteria intersection to improve sight lines. Given the sensitivity of the area residents and Ward Councillor to these traffic issues, it was agreed that current counts at key intersections on these local street are needed as a basis on which to assess the impacts/requirements, if any, of the extended stay hotel proposal. Based on the foregoing, we have prepared this Addendum to both our previous Traffic Impact Study (TIS) and Addendum #1 to support the requested Rezoning and Site Plan. 2. NET CHANGE IN PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC GENERATION Consistent with the TIS we used ITE trip generation rates and then adjusted these to account for local characteristics, with regard to vehicle occupancy, transit ridership and bike/walk travel modes. Included in Attachment #1 are the resultant new vehicle trips for both the previous 69 unit apartment proposal and the current 99 room suite hotel proposal. The following Table 1 compares the peak hour vehicle trip generation of these two land uses.

Figure 1: Site Plan Page 2

Page 3 Table 1: Vehicle Trip Generation Comparison Vph Two-way Total Land Use AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour 69 unit apartment 30 vph 44 vph 99 suite hotel 32 vph 46 vph Net Difference +2 vph +2 vph As can be seen from review of Attachment # 1 and Table 1, the peak hour vehicle trip generation of the previous proposed 69 unit apartment and the currently proposed 99 suite hotel are effectively the same. As such, the related findings, conclusions and recommendations of the TIS remain valid. 3. SITE PLAN OVERVIEW A review of the Figure 1: Site Plan indicates that the dimensions for the parking spaces and circulation aisles meet By-law requirements. With regard to site access/egress, it is the same as per the approved Site Plan, and is therefore considered acceptable. There will be one driveway connection to Paul Anka Drive, located between Wisteria Crescent and Hunt Club Road, and also a driveway connection through to the adjacent recently developed site that will provide access/egress to Gibford. Because of these connections, which provide quite direct access to both Hunt Club and Uplands Drive, it is estimated that very little of the Table 1 sitegenerated traffic will travel on the sections of Paul Anka and Dean Martin between Wisteria and Gibford. 4. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS We are advised of community concerns regarding cut-through traffic using the Paul Anka/ Dean Martin/ Gibford link as a by-pass to the signalized Hunt Club/ Uplands intersection. To assist in either reducing the volume of cut through traffic and/or reduce its speed, we have been advised that the City has recently installed speed bumps on Dean Martin Crescent. To assist in quantifying the current traffic volumes using Paul Anka, Dean Martin and Gibford, Parsons conducted morning and afternoon perk hour traffic counts at these intersections on May 12 and 13, 2015. The count summaries are included as Attachment #2. In review of these counts, it can be seen that at the Paul Anka/Wisteria intersection, the significant majority of peak hour traffic is to/from Wisteria with only a small percentage being through traffic on Paul Anka. At the Wisteria intersection, 75% to 80% of the traffic is to/from Wisteria and only 20% to 25% is through traffic. Table 2: Wisteria/ Paul Anka Traffic Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hours Two-way Traffic on Wisteria 77 vph 87 vph Though Traffic on Paul Anka 28 vph 23 vph Total 105 vph 110 vph At the Dean Martin/Gibford intersection, peak hour volumes were very low as summarized in Attachment #2 and in the following Table 3.

Page 4 Table 3: Dean Martin/Gibford Traffic Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hours Two-way Traffic on Dean Martin 39 vph 49 vph Two-way Traffic on Gibford North of Dean Martin 51 vph 35 vph Two-way Traffic on Gibford South of Dean Martin 62 vph 74 vph As demonstrated in Table 2, the current peak hour traffic volumes on Dean Martin are quite low at approximately 1 vehicle every 1 to 2 minutes during peak hours. During the rest of the day, they would be even less. This volume of traffic is considered very appropriate for and compatible with local streets. Observed Driver Behaviour While conducting the aforementioned traffic counts, the following driver behaviour was observed at the two intersections Wisteria/ Paul Anka Intersection: Poor compliance to the STOP sign on Wisteria. Numerous drivers on Wisteria treated the STOP sign as a Yield sign, and as such only slowed down before continuing into the intersection, but did not stop. Often the driver had to break hard because a car was travelling on Paul Anka, which the Wisteria driver was not anticipating (given the low volume of though traffic on Paul Anka). There is a school bus drop off on Dean Martin. We observed a few vehicles from Wisteria parking in the no parking/no stopping zone on the Paul Anka/Dean Martin curve waiting for children to depart from the school bus. Once the bus left and the children were in the cars, U-turns were performed with the vehicles then turning back into Wisteria. Gibford/Dean Martin Intersection: STOP sign compliance was much better at this intersection, with few rolling stops. As the traffic is more evenly balanced between all-movements (unlike at Wisteria) this is conducive to most drivers stopping correctly. Dean Martin Speed Humps: The two speed humps on Dean Martin appear to be effective for this stretch of road, as these was very little vehicle breaking as cars travelled over the humps. This usually indicates that the design and spacing of the humps is in keeping with the desired travel speed for the road. 5. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Based on the foregoing analysis, the findings, conclusions and recommendations of this Addendum are as follows. Findings and Conclusions The property is seeking a SPA to change the use from a 69 unit apartment building to a 99 unit suite hotel; Comparison of the projected peak hour vehicle trips between the two uses indicates that they are effectively the same (± 2 vph difference); With the exception of the addition of a passenger drop-off lane at the hotel front door and a garbage/loading facility at the east end of the building, the on-site transportation and site access/egress is the same;

Page 5 Current peak hour traffic volumes on Paul Anka, Dean Martin and Gibford are relatively low and in keeping with their local road description; The recently installed speed humps on Dean Martin Crescent appear to be effective in controlling vehicle speed for this section of roadway; At the Wisteria/Paul Anka intersection the following was observed; - The significant majority of traffic (70% to 75%) using this intersection during peak hour is to/from Wisteria. Through traffic is a significant minority (20%-25%); - A noticeable number of vehicles travelling eastbound on Wisteria and approaching the STOP sign on Paul Anka, do not stop, but instead roll though the STOP sign and then only stop (abruptly) if there is a car travelling on Paul Anka; and - Residents of Wisteria Crescent were observed to park illegally on the bend of Paul Anka and Dean Martin to wait for their children to come home on the school bus. Once the children are in the car, a U-turn is made and the vehicle returns to Wisteria Crescent. Adherence to the STOP signs at the Dean Martin/Gibford intersection was high; and Given the location of the site driveway connections to Paul Anka and Gibford, very little site-generated traffic is expected to travel on the section of Paul Anka Drive or Dean Martin Crescent between Wisteria and Gibford. Recommendations As there is effectively no change in site-generated traffic between the previous and current proposed land uses, and as the on-site circulation is also effectively the same, the proposed Site Plan is recommended from a transportation perspective. Please call if you have any questions of the foregoing. Sincerely, Ronald M. Jack, P.Eng. Vice President Manager Ottawa Operations Attachments

Attachment #1: Projected Vehicle Trips - 69 unit apartment - 99 suite hotel

Trip Generation - 99 Room Hotel 19/05/2015 8:54 AM ITE Vehicle Trip Generation Rates Land Use Data Source Trip Rate AM Peak PM Peak Hotel ITE 310 0.56 0.59 Modified Person Trip Generation Rates Land Use Data Source Person Trip Rate AM Peak PM Peak Hotel ITE 310 0.73 0.77 Note: 1.3 factor to account for typical North American auto occupancy values of approximately 1.15 and combined transit and non-motorized modal shares of less than 10% ITE Fitted Curve Equations Land Use Data Source Fitted Curve Equation AM Peak PM Peak Hotel ITE 310 Ln(T)= 1.24Ln(x) - 2.00 N/A 0.00(x) + 0.00 Modified Person Trip Generation Land Use Data Source Area AM Peak (Person Trips/hr) PM Peak (Person Trips/hr) In Out Total In Out Total Total Site Units 61% 39% 53% 47% Hotel ITE 310 99 du 31 21 52 40 36 76 Total 31 21 52 40 36 76 Total Site Trip Generation Travel Mode Mode Share AM Peak (Person Trips/hr) PM Peak (Person Trips/hr) In Out Total In Out Total Auto Driver 60% 19 13 32 24 22 46 Auto Passenger 25% 8 5 13 10 9 19 Transit 10% 3 2 5 4 4 8 Non-motorized 5% 1 1 2 2 1 3 Total Person Trips 100% 31 21 52 40 36 76 Total 'New' Auto Trips 19 13 32 24 22 46 Total Site Vehicle Trip Generation Travel Mode AM Peak (veh/hr) PM Peak (veh/hr) In Out Total In Out Total Total Site Trip Generation 19 13 32 24 22 46 Total 'New' Auto Trips 19 13 32 24 22 46 Prepared by Andre Sponder Page 1 1

Trip Generation - 69 Apartments 19/05/2015 8:56 AM ITE Vehicle Trip Generation Rates Land Use Data Source Trip Rate AM Peak PM Peak Apartments ITE 220 0.51 0.62 Modified Person Trip Generation Rates Land Use Data Source Person Trip Rate AM Peak PM Peak Apartments ITE 220 0.66 0.81 Note: 1.3 factor to account for typical North American auto occupancy values of approximately 1.15 and combined transit and non-motorized modal shares of less than 10% ITE Fitted Curve Equations Land Use Data Source Fitted Curve Equation AM Peak PM Peak Apartments ITE 220 T= 0.49(x) + 3.73 T= 0.55(x) + 17.65 Modified Person Trip Generation Land Use Data Source Area AM Peak (Person Trips/hr) PM Peak (Person Trips/hr) In Out Total In Out Total Total Site Units 20% 80% 65% 35% Apartments ITE 220 69 du 9 40 49 46 26 72 Total 9 40 49 46 26 72 Total Site Trip Generation Travel Mode Mode Share AM Peak (Person Trips/hr) PM Peak (Person Trips/hr) In Out Total In Out Total Auto Driver 60% 6 24 30 28 16 44 Auto Passenger 25% 3 10 13 12 7 19 Transit 10% 0 4 4 4 2 6 Non-motorized 5% 0 2 2 2 1 3 Total Person Trips 100% 9 40 49 46 26 72 Total 'New' Auto Trips 6 24 30 28 16 44 Total Site Vehicle Trip Generation Travel Mode AM Peak (veh/hr) PM Peak (veh/hr) In Out Total In Out Total Total Site Trip Generation 6 24 30 28 16 44 Total 'New' Auto Trips 6 24 30 28 16 44 Prepared by Andre Sponder Page 1 1

Attachment #2: Current 2015 Traffic Counts - Paul Anka/Wisteria - Dean Martin/Gibford

Intersection: Date: Observer: Weather: Time: Paul Anka Dr & Wisteria Cres May 12, 2015 Alex Buck Overcast 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM Paul Anka 6 12 Wisteria 63 4 Wisteria 4 16 Paul Anka TIME NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR 7:30 AM 3 1 0 0 2 0 21 0 3 0 0 0 7:45 AM 1 4 0 0 6 3 14 0 1 0 0 0 8:00 AM 0 8 0 0 2 1 11 0 0 0 0 0 8:15 AM 0 3 0 0 2 2 17 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 4 16 12 6 63 4 Notes: {

Intersection: Date: Observer: Weather: Time: Paul Anka Dr & Wisteria Cres May 12, 2015 Alex Buck Overcast 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM Paul Anka 55 13 Wisteria 26 2 Wisteria 4 10 Paul Anka TIME NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR 4:00 PM 2 2 0 0 5 11 3 0 1 0 0 0 4:15 PM 0 3 0 0 5 14 8 0 0 0 0 0 4:30 PM 0 2 0 0 2 12 9 0 0 0 0 0 4:45 PM 2 3 0 0 1 18 6 0 1 0 0 0 TOTAL 4 10 13 55 26 2 Notes: {

Intersection: Date: Observer: Weather: Time: Dean Martin Cres & Gibford Dr May 13, 2015 Alex Buck Overcast 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM Gibford 4 17 Dean Martin 10 12 Dean Martin 13 20 Gibford TIME NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR 7:30 AM 5 2 0 0 4 1 4 0 4 0 0 0 7:45 AM 4 6 0 0 7 1 3 0 6 0 0 0 8:00 AM 2 2 0 0 2 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 8:15 AM 2 10 0 0 4 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 TOTAL 13 20 17 4 10 12 Notes: {

Intersection: Date: Observer: Weather: Time: Dean Martin Cres & Gibford Dr May 13, 2015 Alex Buck Sunny, Clear 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM Gibford 2 5 Dean Martin 3 21 Dean Martin 23 25 Gibford TIME NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR 4:06 PM 3 8 0 0 1 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 4:15 PM 4 9 0 0 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 4:30 PM 7 3 0 0 2 1 0 0 6 0 0 0 4:45 PM 9 5 0 0 1 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 TOTAL 23 25 5 2 3 21 Notes: {