Lower River Floodplain Restoration and Levee/Towne Road Re-Alignment Noise Analysis

Similar documents
Report Addendum. Terry Keller, SDDOT. Noise Study Technical Report I-29 from Tea Interchange to Skunk Creek Sioux Falls, South Dakota

Red Wing US 63 Bridge and Approach Roadways

Appendix I Noise Background and Modeling Data

Appendix C Noise and Vibration Worksheets

NOISE ANALYSIS TECHNICAL REPORT. Route 58 Martin Luther King Freeway. Portsmouth Virginia

Illinois Route 60/83 Widening and Reconstruction IL Route 176 to IL Route 60 P Traffic Noise Analysis Technical Report FINAL

Construction Noise Memorandum

Attachment E3 Vibration Technical Memorandum

Appendix D. Noise Calculations

REVISED NOISE ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT for the Duke Patterson Avenue Warehouse Project Perris, California

Silverado Village Project

DULLES AIRPORT ACCESS/TOLL ROAD CONNECTOR ROUTE 267, FROM ROUTE 123 TO I-66 NOISE ABATEMENT DESIGN STUDY. Noise Analysis Technical Report

NOISE ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL REPORT for the Duke Perris Boulevard Warehouse Project Perris, California

Definitions of Acoustical Terms

Lincoln 40 Residential

Mississauga Bus Rapid Transit Preliminary Design Project

Southern Windsor County 2016 Traffic Count Program Summary April 2017

East Area 1 Specific Plan Noise Study

COUNTY ROAD SPEED LIMITS. Policy 817 i

NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS BALL ROAD BASIN GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE PROJECT

US 81 Bypass of Chickasha Environmental Assessment Public Meeting

Final Noise Study Report

Purpose and Need Report

Energy Technical Memorandum

Parking and Loading. Page 1 of 7

1. Introduction and Principal Conclusions

Table Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily

Construction Noise Worksheets

Corridor Sketch Summary

The major roadways in the study area are State Route 166 and State Route 33, which are shown on Figure 1-1 and described below:

Characterization of Combined Use of County Road Segment

Traffic Generation November 28, Mr. Todd Baker Baker Properties, LLC 953 Islington Street Suite 23D Portsmouth, NH 03801

The regulatory limits for the project include those prescribed via the Imperial County municipal code.

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

COUNTY ROAD SPEED LIMITS. Policy 817 i

Subarea Study. Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project. Final Version 1. Washington County.

APPENDIX E. Noise Data and Environmental Noise Assessment

a. A written request for speed humps must be submitted by residents living along the applicable street(s) to the Public Works Department.

CR 510/85 Street from CR 512 to 58 Avenue

The Noise Element includes the following policy as it relates to airport and transportation noise on public roadways:

Chapter 7: Corridor Visions

Mystic to Woburn Line Project. Town of Winchester Board of Selectmen Lincoln School Auditorium February 11, 2016

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Traffic, Transportation & Civil Engineering Ali R. Khorasani, P.E. P.O. Box 804, Spencer, MA 01562, Tel: (508)

Noise. Noise Fundamentals. Noise Descriptors. City of Redlands - Redlands Crossing Center

FRESNO COUNTY SUBSECTION OF THE CALIFORNIA HIGH- SPEED TRAIN (HST)

TRAFFIC DEPARTMENT 404 EAST WASHINGTON BROWNSVILLE, TEXAS City of Brownsville Speed Hump Installation Policy

SPEED HUMP POLICY. It is the policy of Hamilton Township to consider requests for speed humps as outlined below:

STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Report

Highway 18 BNSF Railroad Overpass Feasibility Study Craighead County. Executive Summary

December Wilmington School & Residence Sound Attenuation Program. Report #3: Noise Contour Development Methodology Report

Letter EL652 City of Mercer Island. Page 1. No comments n/a

Attachment D Environmental Justice and Outreach

DRIVEWAY STANDARDS EXHIBIT A. The following definition shall replace the definition of driveway in Section 62:

3.17 Energy Resources

The Eastern Connector Study November, 2007 planning for the future

1. INTRODUCTION 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION CUBES SELF-STORAGE MILL CREEK TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON

Open House. Highway212. Meetings. Corridor Access Management, Safety & Phasing Plan. 5:30 to 6:30 p.m. - Southwest Corridor Transportation Coalition

Section 5.0 Traffic Information

Western Land Area Programmatic Environmental Assessment. APPENDIX K: Climate

Overview. Prioritization of Safety Strategies Development of the Minnesota Sinusoidal Rumble Strip Implementation and Public Relations Considerations

5.9 TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

Appendix A. Community Workshop Results PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT

TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...1 INTRODUCTION...3 PROJECTED FUTURE GROWTH...3 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS...4 POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES...

Introduction and Background Study Purpose

IH 35 FEASIBILITY STUDY

APPENDIX B Traffic Analysis

1.1 Purpose of This Environmental Impact Report EIR Process Use of This Report Report Organization...

Traffic Impact Statement (TIS)

H.1 Construction Emissions

OPERATIONS NOISE STUDY FOR A PROPOSED AUTOMATIC CAR WASH IN THE SHERMAN OAKS DISTRICT OF LOS ANGELES

Sound Transit East Link: Bus/LRT System Integration Study

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

STAFF REPORT # CHANGE OF ZONING

Public Information Workshop

November 6, Agenda

AVERAGE DELAY PER VEHICLE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND NO BUILD ALTERNATIVE

Engineering Report: Shasta-Trinity National Forest. South Fork Management Unit. Analysis of. National Forest System Road 30N44

3.15 SAFETY AND SECURITY

JCP&L Verbatim Response to Middletown Township s Questions

A Salt Marsh Advancement Zone Assessment of Greenwich, Connecticut

Chapter 17 TRAFFIC AND VEHICLES. Adoption of Uniform Rules of the Road. Temporary Traffic Regulations.

Turnpike Mitigation Program Application

APPENDIX I Noise Technical Report

STAFF REPORT. To: Planning Commission Meeting date: April 12, 2017 Item: UN Prepared by: Robert Eastman

Proposed Commercial Service at Paine Field Traffic Impact Analysis

Transportation & Traffic Engineering

3.14 Parks and Community Facilities

April 7, Mr. Blake Shutler Compass Homes Development LLC Summit Homes Construction, LLC PO Box 6539 Dillon, CO 80435

NOISE LOCAL LAW FOR VILLAGE OF ROUND LAKE

FLAMBOROUGH QUARRY HAUL ROUTE STUDY HAUL ROUTE VIBRATION REPORT. itrans Consulting Inc 100 York Boulevard Richmond Hill, Ontario L4B 1J8

CHAPTER 7 SIGNS. (2) Signs exempted. The following shall be exempt from the requirements of this chapter:

Right-of-Way Obstruction Permit Fee Structure Minneapolis Department of Public Works May 10, 2001

CHAPTER 9: VEHICULAR ACCESS CONTROL Introduction and Goals Administration Standards

Access Management Standards

Additional $200 Speeding Fine Signs

ARTICLE X OFF-STREET AUTOMOBILE PARKING AND LOADING AND UNLOADING SPACES

Appendix C. Traffic Study

2. Valley Circle Boulevard/Andora Avenue/Baden Avenue and Lassen Street

Transcription:

Lower River Floodplain Restoration and Levee/Towne Road Re-Alignment Noise Analysis This project is not anticipated to create additional noise beyond the current background levels. Although Towne Road is being re-aligned closer to a number of residences, the volume and close proximity to East Anderson Road result in noise levels that are below the FHWA Noise Abatement Criteria (Title 23, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 772), and that are well below the background noise generated from East Anderson Road. The following abbreviated noise analysis addresses temporary construction noise and permanent traffic noise from the re-aligned Towne Road. Sensitive Receptors Sensitive noise receptors are, in general, those areas of human habitation or substantial use where the intrusion of noise has the potential to adversely impact the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the environment. These can include residences, schools, hospitals, parks, and places of business requiring low levels of noise. Within 1300 feet of the centerline of the new route, the following receptors are present. Table 1. Receptors Near the Project Site Residence Name Distance (ft.) to Towne Rd. (New Alignment) Distance (ft.) to Towne Rd. (Old Alignment) Distance (ft.) to E. Anderson Rd. Shults 1092 221 344 Melancon 910 217 221 Najera 675 302 117 De Ford 419 533 129 Bohn 204 1146 153 Houk 403 1487 147 Cufley 363 1436 320 Freeman Trust 650 1672 242 Eberle 1025 1515 2040 PCC* 1288 1820 620 Brown** 988 1380 263 East Anderson Road Traffic Noise Data for East Anderson Road traffic noise was based on Clallam County Road Logs and Traffic Counts (Clallam County, 2009). The legal speed through this portion of the project area is 35 mph as Sequim-Dungeness Way intersects East Anderson. Traffic volume was based on actual counts at East Anderson Road (MP 1.2) from 2009. This Average Daily Traffic Volume (ADT) was 1270 vehicles. This volume includes 72 percent cars, 21 percent medium trucks and 7 percent heavy trucks 1. It is important to note that this measurement was taken approximately ½ 1 Vehicle type was estimated from actual counts of Sequim Dungeness Way, north of Medsker Road, 4/2/2017-4/8/2017. Lower Dungeness River Floodplain Restoration and Levee/Towne Road Re-Alignment Page 1 of 15

mile west of the project site and is likely to show a much lower volume than the vehicle use closer to the intersection of East Anderson Road and Sequim-Dungeness Way, a major route. Vehicle counts from 1999, taken on Sequim-Dungeness Way near this intersection (MP 4.04), showed an ADT of 2385 Towne Road Traffic Noise According to 2017 Clallam County vehicle counts, the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) on Towne Road, measured near the intersection with East Anderson Road (MP 2.66) is 450 vehicles per day. This volume includes 75 percent cars, 20 percent medium trucks and 5 percent heavy trucks 2 Construction Noise For this current project description, the construction noise levels have been based on the most recent version of the Federal Highways Administration s (FHWA) Roadway Construction Noise Model Database (RCNM, USDOT, 2006). The data was derived from dozens (in some cases, hundreds) of samples taken of heavy construction equipment used in the Central Artery/Tunnel (CA/T) project in Boston and has the most comprehensive noise control specification ever developed in the U.S. (USDOT 2006). These noise levels were also compared to several actual measurements of equipment noise from the Elwha Bridge Replacement Project (Table 1). The noise levels from the Elwha Project were found to be at or below those from the FHWA data. This is not surprising since the CA/T project involved larger equipment than the Elwha Bridge Replacement project. Table 2. Construction Equipment Noise Levels Equipment db Measured Average L max at 50 feet From FHWA (2005) Measured at Elwha a Excavator 81 71 Dump Truck 76 65 Grader a 85 ------ Backhoe 78 72 Paver 77 ------ Bulldozer 82 ------ Roller 80 ------ Pickup Truck 75 71.5 (large semi truck) Front-End Loader 79 72 a The Elwha levels are used for comparison only. 2 Vehicle type was estimated from actual counts of Sequim Dungeness Way, north of Medsker Road, 4/2/2017-4/8/2017. Lower Dungeness River Floodplain Restoration and Levee/Towne Road Re-Alignment Page 2 of 15

Following the rules 3 for combining noise levels (WSDOT 2008) the combined noise from the above equipment is 88 db. This noise would be temporary and limited to daylight hours. 3 The maximum db of the three loudest pieces of equipment are: 85 (grader), 82 (bulldozer), and 81 (excavator). The two loudest pieces differ by 3 db, therefore 2 db is added to 85 to equal 87 db. The difference between 87 db and the third loudest piece (81 db) is 6 db, therefore 1 additional db is added to 87 to equal a combined noise of 88 db. Lower Dungeness River Floodplain Restoration and Levee/Towne Road Re-Alignment Page 3 of 15

Analysis Two methodologies were used to assess noise impacts. To calculate the noise resulting from traffic using the re-aligned Towne Road route (as well as East Anderson Road), the FHWA Low-Volume Traffic Noise Model, Version 2.5 (USDOT, 2004) was utilized. This is a simplified calculator that is useful for roads with low vehicle counts. A distance of 50 feet from centerline was used along with projected vehicles/hour rates from Towne and Anderson Roads. The results are shown in Table 3 and 4. Table 3. FHWA Low Volume Calculator for Towne Road Table 4. FHWA Low Volume Calculator for East Anderson Road Lower Dungeness River Floodplain Restoration and Levee/Towne Road Re-Alignment Page 4 of 15

The results show that traffic-generated noise from Towne Road would be 54.3 dba (at 50 feet) and traffic-generated noise from East Anderson Road would be 59.3 dba (at 50 feet). It should be noted that the closest receptor to the re-aligned Towne Road would be the Bohn residence, which is 204 feet. Using this FHWA calculator, the projected noise from Towne Road traffic would be 48.5 dba. To compare the anticipated construction noise and the projected traffic-generated noise from vehicles using the re-aligned Towne Road route, a noise attenuation table was developed, using procedures from the WSDOT Biological Assessment, Advanced Training Manual (WSDOT 2015). The levels were compared against the background traffic-generated noise levels for East Anderson Road. Construction noise was treated as a point source with a reduction of 7.5 decibels per doubling of distance. Traffic noise was treated as a line source with a reduction of 4.5 decibels per doubling of distance. All sites were treated as soft given the fair amount of pastures, trees and shrubs in the area. Table 5 shows the attenuation rates and results in graph form. Table 5. Noise Attenuation Table. Distance (ft.) Construction Noise (-7.5dB)¹ Anderson Road Noise at 35mph (-4.5dB)² Towne Road Noise at 35 mph (-4.5dB)³ Ambient Sound 4 50 88 59.3 54.3 40 100 80.5 54.8 49.8 40 200 73 50.3 45.3 40 400 65.5 45.8 40.8 40 800 58 41.3 36.3 40 1600 50.5 36.8 31.8 40 3200 43 32.3 27.3 40 ¹Based on soft site conditions. ²East Anderson data based on ADT of 1270 vehicles per day, from Clallam County vehicle counts, 2009. ³Towne Road Noise data based on ADT of 450 vehicles per day, from Clallam Co. vehicle counts, 2017. 4 Based on noise levels from a residential density of 227 people per sq. mile (Clallam County census data) Lower Dungeness River Floodplain Restoration and Levee/Towne Road Re-Alignment Page 5 of 15

Sound Level (dba) 100 Construction and Traffic Noise 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 Construction Noise (-7.5dB)¹ Anderson Road Noise at 35mph (-4.5dB)² Towne Road Noise at 35 mph (-4.5dB)³ Ambient Sound4 Distance (ft.) y = -10.82ln(x) + 130.33 y = -6.492ln(x) + 84.697 y = -6.492ln(x) + 79.697 Lower Dungeness River Floodplain Restoration and Levee/Towne Road Re-Alignment Page 6 of 15

A comparison of receptors, distance and noise levels can be compiled into one table. Table 6. Comparison of Receptors and Noise (all in dba) Residence Name Distance (ft.) to Anderson Rd. Distance (ft.) to Towne Rd. (New Alignment) Distance (ft.) to Towne Rd. (Old Alignment) Construction Noise Anderson Rd. Noise 35 mph Towne Rd. Noise (New Alignment) 35 mph Towne Rd. Noise (Old Alignment) 35 mph Najera 117 675 302 54.6 59.8 46.3 51.5 40 Melancon 221 910 217 56.6 61.4 44.4 53.7 40 Shults 344 1092 221 59.8 58.5 43.2 53.6 40 De Ford 129 419 533 65.0 53.1 40.5 38.9 40 Bohn 153 204 1146 72.8 52.0 45.2 34.0 40 Houk 147 403 1487 65.4 52.3 40.8 32.3 40 Cufley 320 363 1436 66.6 47.2 41.4 32.5 40 Freeman Trust 242 650 1672 60.2 49.1 37.6 31.5 40 Eberle 2040 1025 1515 55.3 35.2 34.7 32.2 40 PCC* 620 1288 1820 52.8 43.0 33.2 31.0 40 Brown** 263 988 1380 55.7 48.5 34.9 32.8 40 Ambient Sound * to Towne Rd. - w of residence ** to Towne Rd. - e of residence ***PCC and Brown are located immediately adjacent to Towne Road; Anderson Road is N/A in these cases Lower Dungeness River Floodplain Restoration and Levee/Towne Road Re-Alignment Page 7 of 15

Noise Abatement Criteria The following table is taken from the WSDOT Manual Traffic Noise Analysis and Abatement Policy and Procedures (WSDOT, 2006). It identifies noise levels in that are considered an impact on various land use activity categories. Table 4. Noise Abatement Criteria (NAC) Table Activity Leq (h) Description of Activity Category Category (dba) A 57 (exterior) Lands on which serenity and quiet are of extraordinary significance and serve an important public need and where the preservation of those qualities is essential if the area is to continue to serve its intended purpose. B 67 (exterior) Picnic areas, recreation areas, playgrounds, active sports areas, parks, residences, motels, hotels, schools, churches, libraries, and hospitals.(1)(3) C 72 (exterior) Developed lands, properties, or activities not included in Categories A or B above. D - Undeveloped lands. E 52 (interior) Residences, motels, hotels, public meeting rooms, schools, churches, libraries, hospitals, and auditoriums. Source: U.S. Department of Transportation, 1982; endnote source WSDOT, 2005. Conclusion Noise from the Lower Dungeness River Floodplain Restoration and Levee/Towne Road Re- Alignment will not reach levels where mitigation is required. Traffic-generated noise from vehicles using the new route will not exceed the Noise Abatement Criteria established by the FHWA at any of the receptor sites. While the receptor-site residences are rated as Activity Category B, the greatest noise at the closest receptor will not even exceed the threshold for Activity Category A. The noise from East Anderson Road is the overriding factor in this area. Noise outputs from this road are 12-13 db above any noise expected from traffic on the re-aligned Towne Road route, or are at levels that are below the ambient (background) noise levels. Although constructiongenerated noise will be above this background noise, it will be temporary and largely limited to daylight hours. Lower Dungeness River Floodplain Restoration and Levee/Towne Road Re-Alignment Page 8 of 15

References USDOT 2004. FHWA traffic noise model version 2.5 user s guide. USDOT Federal Highway Administration. Washington, D.C. USDOT 2006. FHWA roadway construction noise model (FHWA RCNM) version 1.0. USDOT Federal Highway Administration. Washington, D.C. WSDOT 2006. Traffic noise analysis and abatement policy and procedures. Washington State Department of Transportation. Olympia, WA. WSDOT 2015. Biological assessment preparation for transportation projects, advanced training manual. Washington State Department of Transportation. Olympia, WA. Clallam County 2017, 1999. Vehicle counts from Towne Road and East Anderson Road. Clallam County Public Works, WA. Lower Dungeness River Floodplain Restoration and Levee/Towne Road Re-Alignment Page 9 of 15

Brown PCC Farmland Trust Lower Dungeness River Floodplain Restoration and Levee/Towne Road Re-Alignment Page 10 of 15

Eberle Freeman Trust Lower Dungeness River Floodplain Restoration and Levee/Towne Road Re-Alignment Page 11 of 15

Cufley Houk Lower Dungeness River Floodplain Restoration and Levee/Towne Road Re-Alignment Page 12 of 15

Bohn DeFord Lower Dungeness River Floodplain Restoration and Levee/Towne Road Re-Alignment Page 13 of 15

Najera Melancon Lower Dungeness River Floodplain Restoration and Levee/Towne Road Re-Alignment Page 14 of 15

Shults Lower Dungeness River Floodplain Restoration and Levee/Towne Road Re-Alignment Page 15 of 15