Finding List by Question by State *

Finding List by Question by State * I. What are the elements of a claim for tortious interference in the context of recruiting or hiring an employee with a restrictive covenant (e.g., noncompete, nonsolicitation, or nondisclosure)? AL... 1 3 AK... 29 AZ... 45 AR... 91 17 CA... 115 25 CO... 151 CT... 171 37 DE... 209 43 DC... 233 49 FL... R 55 GA... 303 105 HI... 335 ID... 353 IL... 375 121 IN... R 131 IA... 443 185 KS... 467 KY... 491 LA... 511 201 ME... R 207 MD... 551 233 MA... R 239 MI... R 335 MN... 665 MS... 701 347 MO... 723 MT... 753 NE... 773 NV... 795 NH... R 371 NJ... 837 397 NM... 871 NY... R 409 NC... 925 ND... 961 457 OH... 983 463 OK... 1021 477 OR... 1043 483 PA... 1063 489 PR... 1129 RI... R 505 SC... 1185 SD... 1211 TN... 1231 555 TX... 1265 563 UT... 1297 571 VT... 1321 581 VA... 1339 585 WA... 1373 595 WV... 1393 603 WI... 1425 WY... 1451 * Editor s Note: This list is alphabetized by the full state or territory name, not by the two-letter form. Thus, the first entry on the list is AL (Alabama) rather than AK (Alaska). For a key to state and territory abbreviations, see the list of state and territory abbreviations on page xvii. An R in the Main Edition page number column indicates that the answer to this question as it appears in the Main Edition has been replaced by the answer as it appears in this supplement. xxi

xxii Tortious Interference 2016 Cum. Supp. A. Former employer s claim against new employer for tortious interference with the restrictive covenant itself. AL... 1 AK... 29 AZ... 46 AR... 91 17 CA... 115 CO... 151 CT... 171 37 DE... 209 DC... 233 FL... R GA... 303 105 HI... 335 ID... 353 IL... 375 121 IN... R 131 IA... R 185 KS... 467 KY... 491 LA... 511 201 ME... R 207 MD... R 239 MA... 583 MI... R 293 MN... 665 335 MS... 701 MO... 723 MT... 753 NE... 773 NV... 795 NH... R 371 NJ... 837 NM... 871 NY... R 409 NC... 925 447 ND... 961 OH... R 463 OK... 1022 OR... 1043 PA... 1065 489 PR... 1129 RI... R 505 SC... 1185 SD... 1211 TN... 1231 555 TX... 1265 563 UT... 1297 571 VT... 1321 VA... 1339 WA... 1373 WV... 1393 603 WI... 1425 WY... 1451 B. Former employer s claim against new employer for tortious interference with the former employer s business contracts or expectancies. AL... 2 3 AK... 29 AZ... 48 AR... 93 18 CA... 116 25 CO... 151 CT... 173 DE... 211 43 DC... 234 49 FL... R 59 GA... 306 106 HI... 335 ID... 354 IL... 375 121 IN... R 136 IA... 444 KS... 468 KY... 492 LA... 512 202 ME... R 213 MD... 553 233 MA... R 250 MI... R 296 MN... 668 335 MS... 702 MO... R 347 MT... 753 NE... 774 NV... 796 NH... R 371 NJ... 840 397 NM... 871 NY... R 412 NC... 928 448 ND... 961 457 OH... R 463 OK... 1023 477 OR... 1043 483 PA... 1072 491 PR... 1129 RI... R 508 SC... 1188 SD... 1212 TN... 1234 TX... 1268 563 UT... 1298 572 VT... 1321 581 VA... 1343 585 WA... 1374 595 WV... 1393 WI... 1426 WY... 1451

Finding List by Question by State xxiii II. Tortious interference in the context of the restrictive covenant itself. AL... 5 3 AK... 30 7 AZ... 51 13 AR... 94 19 CA... 118 26 CO... 152 31 CT... 176 37 DE... 212 44 DC... 238 50 FL... R 64 GA... 307 106 HI... 336 113 ID... 354 117 IL... 376 123 IN... 405 140 IA... 445 186 KS... 469 191 KY... 492 197 LA... 512 202 ME... R 213 MD... 555 234 MA... R 253 MI... R 301 MN... 669 337 MS... 703 343 MO... 725 350 MT... 754 357 NE... 776 361 NV... 796 367 NH... 817 373 NJ... 846 398 NM... 873 405 NY... R 415 NC... 929 449 ND... 963 457 OH... 986 467 OK... 1023 478 OR... 1044 484 PA... 1081 493 PR... 1130 501 RI... R 512 SC... 1190 547 SD... 1213 551 TN... 1237 556 TX... 1273 564 UT... 1300 575 VT... 1322 581 VA... 1347 586 WA... 1375 596 WV... 1394 604 WI... 1427 609 WY... 1452 615 A. Will a claim lie against the new employer where the restrictive covenant involves an employee who had an at-will employment relationship with the former employer? AL... 5 AK... 30 AZ... 51 AR... 94 CA... 118 26 CO... 152 31 CT... 176 DE... 212 DC... 238 50 FL... 266 64 GA... 307 HI... 336 ID... 354 IL... 376 123 IN... R 140 IA... 445 KS... 469 KY... 492 LA... 512 202 ME... R 213 MD... 555 MA... R 253 MI... R 301 MN... 669 MS... 703 MO... 725 MT... 754 NE... 776 361 NV... 796 NH... R 373 NJ... 846 NM... 873 NY... R 415 NC... 929 ND... 963 457 OH... 986 OK... 1023 OR... 1044 PA... 1081 493 PR... 1130 RI... R 512 SC... 1190 547 SD... 1213 TN... 1237 TX... 1273 564 UT... 1300 VT... 1322 VA... 1347 WA... 1375 WV... 1394 WI... 1427 609 WY... 1452

xxiv Tortious Interference 2016 Cum. Supp. B. Will the claim against the new employer be any different if the employee was employed for a definite term by the former employer? AL... 5 AK... 30 AZ... 52 AR... 96 CA... 121 CO... 152 CT... 179 DE... 213 DC... 238 FL... R 65 GA... 309 HI... 336 ID... 354 IL... 377 IN... R 143 IA... 447 KS... 470 KY... 493 LA... 512 ME... R 214 MD... 556 MA... R 255 MI... R 304 MN... 670 MS... 703 MO... 726 MT... 754 357 NE... 777 361 NV... 797 NH... R 374 NJ... 846 NM... 874 NY... R 418 NC... 930 ND... 963 OH... 987 OK... 1023 OR... 1044 PA... 1083 PR... 1130 RI... R 513 SC... 1190 547 SD... 1213 TN... 1240 TX... 1273 UT... 1300 VT... 1322 VA... 1348 586 WA... 1375 WV... 1395 WI... 1427 WY... 1452 C. What defenses to this type of tortious interference claim generally are available? AL... 6 3 AK... 30 7 AZ... 53 13 AR... 96 19 CA... 121 27 CO... 152 32 CT... 179 37 DE... 213 44 DC... R 50 FL... R 65 GA... 309 106 HI... 336 113 ID... 355 117 IL... 377 124 IN... R 144 IA... 447 186 KS... 470 191 KY... 493 197 LA... 512 203 ME... R 214 MD... 558 234 MA... R 255 MI... R 304 MN... 670 337 MS... 704 343 MO... 727 350 MT... 754 NE... 777 361 NV... 797 367 NH... R 375 NJ... 847 398 NM... 874 405 NY... R 418 NC... 930 449 ND... 964 457 OH... 988 467 OK... 1023 478 OR... 1045 484 PA... 1084 493 PR... 1131 501 RI... R 513 SC... 1191 547 SD... 1213 551 TN... 1240 557 TX... 1274 565 UT... 1301 575 VT... 1323 581 VA... 1349 587 WA... 1375 596 WV... 1395 604 WI... 1428 609 WY... 1452 615

Finding List by Question by State xxv 1. Invalidity or unenforceability of the restrictive covenant. AL... 6 AK... 30 AZ... 53 CA... 121 CO... 152 DE... 213 DC... 239 50 FL... R 65 GA... 309 106 HI... 336 ID... 355 IL... 377 124 IA... 447 KS... 470 KY... 493 ME... R 214 MD... 558 234 MA... R 257 MI... R 304 MN... 670 337 MS... 704 MO... 727 MT... 754 NE... 777 NV... 797 NH... R 375 NJ... 847 NM... 874 NY... R 421 NC... 930 449 ND... 964 OH... 988 OK... 1023 OR... 1045 484 PA... 1084 PR... 1131 RI... R 513 SC... 1191 SD... 1213 TN... TX... 1274 565 UT... 1301 VT... 1323 VA... 1349 587 WA... 1375 WV... 1395 WI... 1428 WY... 1452 2. Breach of contract by the former employer. AL... 7 AK... 31 AZ... 54 CA... 123 CO... 153 DE... 214 DC... 239 FL... R 66 GA... 310 HI... 336 ID... 355 IL... 381 IA... 447 KS... 472 KY... 494 ME... 535 214 MD... 560 MA... 599 259 MI... 638 306 MN... 673 MS... 704 MO... 729 MT... 755 NE... 778 NV... 797 NH... R 375 NJ... 848 NM... 874 NY... R 422 NC... 932 ND... 964 OH... 990 467 OK... 1024 OR... 1045 PA... 1086 PR... 1132 RI... R 514 SC... 1191 SD... 1213 TN... TX... 1274 UT... 1301 VT... 1323 VA... 1352 WA... 1376 WV... 1396 WI... 1429 WY... 1453

xxvi Tortious Interference 2016 Cum. Supp. 3. Unclean hands, estoppel, or other equitable defenses. AL... 7 AK... 31 AZ... 54 CA... 124 CO... 153 CT... 185 DE... 214 DC... 239 FL... R 67 GA... 310 HI... 337 ID... 355 IL... 382 IA... 448 KS... 472 KY... 494 ME... R 214 MD... 560 MA... R 260 MI... R 306 MN... 673 MS... 704 MO... 730 MT... 755 NE... 778 NV... 798 NH... R 375 NJ... 849 NM... 874 NY... R 422 NC... 932 ND... 964 OH... 992 OK... 1024 OR... 1045 PA... 1086 PR... 1132 RI... 1156 515 SC... 1191 SD... 1213 TN... TX... 1274 UT... 1301 VT... 1323 VA... 1352 WA... 1376 WV... 1396 WI... 1430 WY... 1453 4. What are the parameters of the affirmative defense of justification or the competitor s privilege? AL... 8 3 AK... 31 7 AZ... 54 AR... 97 20 CA... 126 CO... 154 32 DE... 215 44 DC... 239 FL... R 67 GA... 313 HI... 337 ID... 356 IL... 383 IN... R 144 IA... 448 186 KS... 473 KY... 494 ME... R 214 MD... 560 MA... R 262 MI... R 307 MN... 674 MS... 704 MO... R 350 MT... 755 357 NE... 778 361 NV... 798 NH... R 375 NJ... 849 NM... 874 NY... R 423 NC... 932 450 ND... 964 OH... 992 468 OK... 1024 OR... 1046 PA... 1087 493 PR... 1132 RI... R 515 SC... 1192 SD... 1214 TN... 1242 557 TX... 1275 565 UT... 1301 575 VT... 1323 VA... 1352 WA... 1376 WV... 1397 WI... 1430 WY... 1453

5. Preemption. Finding List by Question by State xxvii AL... 9 AK... 31 8 AZ... 59 13 AR... 97 20 CA... 127 27 CO... 154 CT... 185 38 DE... 215 44 DC... 51 FL... 70 GA... 314 106 HI... 337 113 ID... 356 117 IL... 383 124 IN... R 146 IA... 448 KS... 473 191 KY... 495 197 LA... 512 203 ME... R 214 MD... 560 235 MA... R 263 MI... R 308 MN... 676 337 MS... 705 343 MO... R 352 MT... 755 NE... 778 362 NV... 798 367 NH... R 376 NJ... 850 398 NM... 875 405 NY... R 425 NC... 934 452 ND... 965 458 OH... 995 468 OK... 1024 478 OR... 1046 484 PA... 495 PR... 1132 501 RI... R 517 SC... 547 SD... 1214 551 TN... 1242 557 TX... 1276 566 UT... 1302 576 VT... 1323 581 VA... 1353 587 WA... 1377 596 WV... 604 WI... 1431 611 WY... 1454 615 6. Absence of damage. AL... AK... AZ... 59 CA... CO... DE... DC... FL... GA... HI... ID... IL... IA... KS... KY... ME... MD... 561 MA... MI... MN... 676 MS... MO... MT... NE... NV... NH... 819 NJ... NM... NY... NC... ND... OH... OK... OR... PA... PR... RI... SC... SD... TN... TX... UT... 1303 VT... VA... 1354 WA... WV... WI... WY...

xxviii Tortious Interference 2016 Cum. Supp. 7. Gist of the action doctrine. AZ... 59 PA... 1089 8. Failure to establish breach of covenant. NC... 934 452 OH... 996 468 VA... 1354 9. Failure to prove causation. AZ... 59 10. Statute of limitations. DC... 241 MI... 309 NH... R 377 TX... 1276 VA... 588 11. Economic loss rule. FL... R 70 D. What relief is available to the former employer? AL... 9 AK... 31 AZ... 60 AR... 98 CA... 127 CO... 155 CT... 186 DE... 215 DC... 241 FL... R 70 GA... 314 HI... 337 ID... 357 117 IL... R 147 IN... 411 IA... 448 KS... 474 KY... 495 LA... 512 ME... R 215 MD... 561 MA... R 263 MI... R 309 MN... 676 338 MS... 705 MO... 731 MT... 756 NE... 778 NV... 799 NH... R 378 NJ... 850 NM... 875 NY... R 425 NC... 935 ND... 965 OH... 998 469 OK... 1025 OR... 1046 PA... 1091 PR... 1133 RI... R 518 SC... 1194 SD... 1214 TN... 1242 TX... 1277 UT... 1303 VT... 1324 VA... 1355 588 WA... 1377 597 WV... 1397 WI... 1431 WY... 1454

Finding List by Question by State xxix 1. What damages are available, and how are they measured? AL... 9 AK... 31 AZ... 60 CA... 127 CO... 155 CT... 186 DE... 215 DC... 241 FL... R 71 GA... 314 HI... 337 ID... 357 IL... 383 IA... 448 KS... 474 KY... 495 ME... R 215 MD... 561 MA... R 263 MI... R 310 MN... 676 338 MS... 705 MO... 731 MT... 756 NE... 778 NV... 799 NH... R 378 NJ... 850 NM... 875 NY... R 425 NC... 935 ND... 965 OH... R 469 OK... 1025 OR... 1046 PA... 1091 PR... 1133 RI... R 518 SC... 1194 SD... 1214 TN... 1243 TX... 1277 UT... 1303 VT... 1324 VA... 1355 588 WA... 1377 WV... 1397 WI... 1431 WY... 1454 2. What type of injunctive relief is available? AL... 10 AK... 32 AZ... 61 CA... 129 CO... 155 CT... 188 DE... 216 DC... 242 FL... R 72 GA... 315 HI... 337 ID... 358 IL... 385 IA... 450 KS... 475 KY... 496 ME... R 215 MD... 564 MA... R 264 MI... R 311 MN... 678 338 MS... 706 MO... 733 MT... 756 NE... 779 NV... 799 NH... R 379 NJ... 851 NM... 876 NY... R 425 NC... 937 ND... 966 OH... 1001 OK... 1025 OR... 1046 PA... 1096 PR... 1133 RI... R 522 SC... 1195 SD... 1214 TN... TX... 1278 UT... 1304 VT... 1324 VA... 1356 WA... 1378 WV... 1400 WI... 1433 WY... 1454

xxx Tortious Interference 2016 Cum. Supp. 3. Are there circumstances where attorney s fees may be recoverable? AL... 11 AK... 32 AZ... 61 CA... 129 CO... 156 CT... 189 DE... 217 DC... 243 FL... R 77 GA... 316 HI... 337 ID... 358 117 IL... 386 IA... 450 KS... 475 KY... 496 ME... R 215 MD... 564 MA... R 266 MI... R 312 MN... 681 MS... 706 MO... 733 MT... 756 NE... 779 NV... 800 NH... R 379 NJ... 851 NM... 876 NY... R 426 NC... 937 ND... 966 OH... 1002 OK... 1025 OR... 1047 PA... 1099 PR... 1133 RI... R 523 SC... 1195 SD... 1214 TN... TX... 1278 UT... 1304 VT... 1324 VA... 1356 588 WA... 1378 WV... 1406 WI... 1433 WY... 1454 E. What similar claims does the state recognize (e.g., unfair competition, conspiracy, etc.)? AL... 11 AK... 32 AZ... 64 AR... 98 21 CA... 130 CO... 156 CT... 190 DE... 217 DC... 243 FL... R 78 GA... 316 HI... 338 ID... 359 IL... 387 IN... R 149 IA... 450 KS... R 191 KY... 496 ME... R 216 MD... 565 MA... R 266 MI... R 312 MN... 681 MS... 707 MO... 733 MT... 756 NE... 779 NV... 800 NH... R 380 NJ... 852 NM... 876 NY... R 426 NC... 938 ND... 966 OH... 1003 OK... 1025 OR... 1047 PA... 1100 495 PR... 1133 RI... R 523 SC... 1196 SD... 1215 TN... 1244 TX... 1279 UT... 1305 VT... 1324 VA... 1356 WA... 1378 WV... 1406 WI... 1433 WY... 1455

Finding List by Question by State xxxi III. Issues common to tortious interference claims in the employment context generally. AL... 12 4 AK... 32 8 AZ... 69 13 AR... 101 21 CA... 131 28 CO... 156 30 CT... 192 39 DE... 218 45 DC... 245 51 FL... R 79 GA... 317 107 HI... 338 113 ID... 360 118 IL... 388 125 IN... R 153 IA... 452 186 KS... 476 192 KY... 497 197 LA... 513 203 ME... R 217 MD... 566 232 MA... R 269 MI... R 315 MN... 684 339 MS... 707 343 MO... 734 353 MT... 757 357 NE... 780 362 NV... 801 368 NH... R 380 NJ... 854 399 NM... 877 405 NY... R 427 NC... 942 453 ND... 967 459 OH... 1003 473 OK... 1026 478 OR... 1048 485 PA... 1105 495 PR... 1134 501 RI... R 523 SC... 1197 548 SD... 1216 551 TN... 1246 558 TX... 1279 566 UT... 1305 576 VT... 1325 582 VA... 1360 589 WA... 1379 598 WV... 1407 604 WI... 1436 612 WY... 1455 615 A. What, if any, hiring measures should be adopted by a new employer for screening new employees with restrictive covenants? AL... 12 AK... 32 AZ... 69 AR... 101 CA... 131 CO... 156 CT... 192 DE... 218 DC... 245 FL... R 79 GA... 317 HI... 338 ID... 360 IL... 388 IN... R 153 IA... 452 KS... 476 KY... 497 LA... 513 ME... R 217 MD... 566 MA... R 269 MI... R 315 MN... 684 MS... 707 MO... 734 MT... 757 NE... 780 NV... 801 NH... R 380 NJ... 854 NM... 877 NY... R 427 NC... 942 ND... 967 OH... 1003 OK... 1026 OR... 1048 PA... 1105 PR... 1134 RI... R 523 SC... 1197 SD... 1216 TN... 1246 TX... 1279 UT... 1305 VT... 1325 VA... 1360 WA... 1379 WV... 1407 WI... 1436 WY... 1455

xxxii Tortious Interference 2016 Cum. Supp. 1. Is a potential employer better off not asking whether a prospective employee has a restrictive covenant? AL... 12 AK... 32 AZ... 69 CA... 131 CO... 156 DE... DC... 245 FL... R 79 GA... HI... 338 ID... 360 IL... 388 IA... 452 KS... 476 KY... 497 ME... R 217 MD... 567 MA... MI... R 315 MN... 684 MS... 707 MO... 734 MT... 757 NE... 780 NV... 801 NH... R 380 NJ... 854 NM... 877 NY... R 427 NC... 942 ND... 967 OH... 1003 OK... 1026 OR... 1048 PA... 1105 PR... RI... R 523 SC... 1197 SD... 1216 TN... 1246 TX... 1279 UT... 1305 VT... 1325 VA... 1360 WA... 1379 WV... 1407 WI... 1436 WY... 1455 2. If a new employer hires a new employee without knowledge of a restrictive covenant, is the new employer at risk if it continues to employ the new employee after learning of the restrictive covenant? AL... 12 AK... 32 AZ... 69 CA... 132 CO... 156 DE... DC... 245 FL... R 79 GA... HI... 339 ID... 360 IL... 389 IA... 452 KS... 476 KY... 497 ME... R 217 MD... 567 MA... MI... R 316 MN... 685 MS... 707 MO... 734 MT... 757 NE... 780 NV... 801 NH... R 380 NJ... 855 NM... 877 NY... R 427 NC... 943 ND... 967 OH... 1004 OK... 1026 OR... 1048 PA... 1106 PR... RI... R 524 SC... 1197 SD... 1217 TN... 1247 TX... 1280 UT... 1305 VT... 1325 VA... 1360 WA... 1379 WV... 1407 WI... 1436 WY... 1455

Finding List by Question by State xxxiii 3. Does consultation with outside counsel provide a defense to a claim of tortious interference? AL... 13 AK... 32 AZ... 70 CA... 132 CO... 157 DE... DC... 245 FL... R 79 GA... HI... 339 ID... 360 IL... 389 IA... 453 KS... 477 KY... 498 ME... R 217 MD... 567 MA... MI... R 316 MN... 685 MS... 708 MO... 735 MT... 757 NE... 780 NV... 801 NH... R 380 NJ... 855 NM... 877 NY... R 428 NC... 943 ND... 967 OH... 1004 OK... 1027 OR... 1048 PA... 1106 PR... RI... R 524 SC... 1197 SD... 1217 TN... 1248 TX... 1280 UT... 1305 VT... 1325 VA... 1360 WA... 1379 WV... 1407 WI... 1436 WY... 1455 B. What practical advice should be given to a company that is considering hiring an employee who may have a restrictive covenant with his former employer? AL... 13 AK... 33 AZ... 70 AR... 101 CA... 133 CO... 157 CT... 193 DE... 218 DC... 245 FL... R 79 GA... 317 107 HI... 339 ID... 360 IL... 389 IN... R 153 IA... 453 KS... 477 KY... 498 LA... 513 ME... R 217 MD... 567 MA... R 270 MI... R 316 MN... 685 MS... 708 MO... 735 MT... 758 NE... 781 NV... 801 NH... R 381 NJ... 856 NM... 877 NY... R 428 NC... 943 ND... 967 OH... 1004 OK... 1027 OR... 1048 PA... 1106 PR... 1134 RI... R 525 SC... 1197 SD... 1217 TN... 1249 TX... 1280 UT... 1306 VT... 1325 VA... 1360 WA... 1379 WV... 1408 WI... 1437 WY... 1455

xxxiv Tortious Interference 2016 Cum. Supp. C. What about indemnification? AL... 14 AK... 33 AZ... 70 AR... 102 CA... 135 CO... 157 CT... 194 DE... 218 DC... 245 FL... R 80 GA... 318 HI... 339 ID... 361 IL... 390 IN... R 154 IA... 453 KS... 477 KY... 498 LA... 513 ME... R 217 MD... 568 MA... R 270 MI... R 317 MN... 686 MS... 708 MO... 736 MT... 758 NE... 782 NV... 802 NH... R 381 NJ... 856 NM... 878 NY... R 428 NC... 943 ND... 967 OH... 1004 OK... 1027 OR... 1049 PA... 1107 PR... 1134 RI... R 525 SC... 1198 SD... 1217 TN... 1249 TX... 1280 UT... 1306 VT... 1325 VA... 1360 WA... 1380 WV... 1408 WI... 1437 WY... 1456 1. Does the new employer have to indemnify the employee? AL... AK... 33 AZ... 70 CA... 135 CO... 157 DE... DC... 245 FL... R 80 GA... HI... 339 ID... 361 IL... 390 IA... 453 KS... 477 KY... 498 ME... R 217 MD... 568 MA... MI... MN... 686 MS... 708 MO... 736 MT... 758 NE... 782 NV... 802 NH... R 381 NJ... NM... 878 NY... R 428 NC... 943 ND... 967 OH... 1004 OK... 1027 OR... 1049 PA... 1107 PR... RI... R 525 SC... 1198 SD... 1217 TN... TX... 1280 UT... 1306 VT... 1325 VA... 1360 WA... 1380 WV... 1408 WI... 1437 WY... 1456

Finding List by Question by State xxxv 2. Can the new employer indemnify the new employee? AL... AK... 33 AZ... 71 CA... 136 CO... 157 DE... DC... 245 FL... R 80 GA... HI... 339 ID... 361 IL... 390 IA... 453 KS... 478 KY... 498 ME... R 218 MD... 568 MA... MI... MN... 686 MS... 708 MO... 736 MT... 758 NE... 782 NV... 802 NH... R 381 NJ... NM... 878 NY... R 428 NC... 943 ND... 967 OH... 1004 OK... 1027 OR... 1049 PA... 1108 PR... RI... R 525 SC... 1198 SD... 1218 TN... TX... 1280 UT... 1306 VT... 1325 VA... 1360 WA... 1380 WV... 1408 WI... 1437 WY... 1456 3. Can or will indemnification affect liability or damage? AL... AK... 33 AZ... 71 CA... 136 CO... 157 DE... DC... 246 FL... R 80 GA... HI... 339 ID... 361 IL... 391 IA... 453 KS... 478 KY... 498 ME... R 218 MD... 568 MA... MI... MN... 686 MS... 708 MO... 736 MT... 758 NE... 782 NV... 802 NH... R 381 NJ... NM... 878 NY... R 428 NC... 944 ND... 968 OH... 1005 OK... 1027 OR... 1049 PA... 1109 PR... RI... R 525 SC... 1198 SD... 1218 TN... TX... 1280 UT... 1306 VT... 1326 VA... 1361 WA... 1380 WV... 1408 WI... 1437 WY... 1456

xxxvi Tortious Interference 2016 Cum. Supp. D. When will individual officers or employees of the new employer be held personally liable for tortious interference? AL... 14 AK... 33 AZ... 71 AR... 102 CA... 137 CO... 157 33 CT... 194 39 DE... 219 DC... 246 FL... R 80 GA... 318 108 HI... 340 ID... 361 IL... 391 125 IN... R 154 IA... 453 KS... 478 KY... 498 197 LA... 513 ME... R 218 MD... 568 MA... R 271 MI... R 317 MN... 686 MS... 709 MO... 736 MT... 758 NE... 782 362 NV... 802 NH... R 381 NJ... 856 399 NM... 878 NY... R 428 NC... 944 453 ND... 968 OH... 1005 OK... 1027 OR... 1049 PA... 1109 PR... 1134 RI... R 525 SC... 1198 SD... 1218 TN... 1249 558 TX... 1280 UT... 1306 VT... 1326 VA... 1361 WA... 1380 WV... 1408 WI... 1438 WY... 1456 E. When may the former employer be found liable for tortious interference with the former employee s relationship with his new employer? AL... 15 AK... 33 AZ... 74 AR... 102 CA... 138 CO... 158 33 CT... 196 DE... 219 DC... 246 FL... R 81 GA... 319 HI... 340 ID... 362 IL... 392 127 IN... R 160 IA... 454 KS... 478 KY... 498 LA... 514 ME... R 218 MD... 569 MA... R 275 MI... R 319 MN... 687 MS... 709 MO... 737 MT... 759 NE... 782 NV... 803 NH... R 382 NJ... 857 400 NM... 879 NY... R 429 NC... 944 ND... 968 OH... 1005 OK... 1028 OR... 1049 PA... 1110 496 PR... 1134 RI... R 526 SC... 1199 SD... 1218 TN... 1250 558 TX... 1281 UT... 1306 576 VT... 1326 VA... 1361 WA... 1380 WV... 1409 WI... 1438 WY... 1456

Finding List by Question by State xxxvii F. Law review articles and other resources that examine tortious interference with restrictive covenants or tortious interference generally in this state. AL... 16 4 AK... 33 8 AZ... 75 13 AR... 103 22 CA... 139 28 CO... 158 34 CT... 196 40 DE... 220 45 DC... 247 51 FL... R 82 GA... 320 108 HI... 340 113 ID... 362 118 IL... 394 127 IN... R 170 IA... 455 186 KS... 479 192 KY... 499 198 LA... 516 203 ME... R 229 MD... 570 235 MA... R 276 MI... R 320 MN... 689 339 MS... 710 343 MO... 738 353 MT... 759 357 NE... 782 364 NV... 803 368 NH... R 382 NJ... 857 402 NM... 879 405 NY... R 431 NC... 945 453 ND... 969 459 OH... 1006 473 OK... 1029 478 OR... 1049 485 PA... 1117 496 PR... 1135 501 RI... R 528 SC... 1199 548 SD... 1218 551 TN... 1252 560 TX... 1282 566 UT... 1307 576 VT... 1326 582 VA... 1361 589 WA... 1381 598 WV... 1413 604 WI... 1438 612 WY... 1456 615