Department of Aeronautic, Automotive and Ocean Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia b

Similar documents
CO 2 Emission of Marine Transports in Batam - Singapore

Robert Beckman Head, Ocean Law & Policy Programme NUS Centre for International Law

Serbia. Website Ministry of Construction, Transport and Infrastructure. Contact points Flag State

Air Pollutant Emissions from ships: high Tyrrhenian Sea ports case study C. Trozzi, R. Vaccaro r /. - Kz'a TV. Za&zg/z'a, j ^3

- 1 - Agenda item 10(e) Emissions from fuel used for international aviation and maritime transport

Pollution & GHG emissions from ships. Development of market-based. Marine Environment Division - IMO

Monitoring, reporting and verification of CO 2 emissions from ships - EU MRV regulation and obligations and the parallel IMO activities

Supporting Information

Pollution from ships in Copenhagen Port and the effect on city air quality

AIR POLLUTION AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY. Report of the Working Group on Air Pollution and Energy Efficiency. Part 2

Module 8: Nonroad Mobile Source Emission Inventory Development

MARINTEK The Norwegian Marine Technology Research Institute

Marine Emission Inventory Tool

Ship Energy Efficiency and Air Pollution. Ernestos Tzannatos Department of Maritime Studies University of Piraeus

Annex IV. True nationality of the 20 largest fleets by flag of registration, as at 1 January 2011 a

REVIEW OF MARITIME TRANSPORT 2013

2011 Air Emissions Inventory

Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission

Road Safety Status of AEC Countries

MARPOL Annex VI prevention of air pollution from ships

UPDATE OF THE SURVEY OF SULFUR LEVELS IN COMMERCIAL JET FUEL. Final Report. November 2012

1 Faculty advisor: Roland Geyer

Shipping and Environmental Challenges MARINTEK 1

REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA. Noted by Indonesia

2012 Air Emissions Inventory

2009 Air Emissions Inventory

INFORMATION BULLETIN No. 165

Shipping Emissions and Air Quality Impacts in East Asia

AIR POLLUTION AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY. EEDI reduction beyond phase 2. Submitted by Liberia, ICS, BIMCO, INTERFERRY, INTERTANKO, CLIA and IPTA SUMMARY

By Edmund Hughes, Technical Officer, Marine Environment Division, IMO

Straits of Malacca and Singapore: Future Perspective

GASEOUS FUELS SAFETY ASPECTS

2020 GLOBAL SULPHUR LIMIT HISTORY, CURRENT STATUS, AND THE INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION S (IMO S) WORK PLAN FOR EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION

SECTION 2 OCEAN-GOING VESSELS

Emission control at marine terminals

REVISED CONSOLIDATED FORMAT FOR REPORTING ALLEGED INADEQUACIES OF PORT RECEPTION FACILITIES

REVISED RECOMMENDATION FOR MATERIAL DATA SHEETS (MSDS) FOR MARPOL ANNEX I TYPE OIL AS CARGO IN BULK AND MARINE FUEL OIL

OCTOBER 2017 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM GLOBAL SHIPPING, NAYA OLMER, BRYAN COMER, BISWAJOY ROY, XIAOLI MAO, AND DAN RUTHERFORD

INFORMATION BULLETIN No. 165

Arabian Gulf Threats. 17 M barrels/ day, 35% of the world oil trade. Largest offshore oil development area in the world

Readily Achievable EEDI Requirements for 2020

Quantification of GHGs Emissions from Industrial Sector in Mauritius

European Regulation MRV. Luis Guerrero 2 nd November 2015

SUBSIDIARY BODY FOR SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL ADVICE Fourteenth session Bonn, July 2001 Item 3 (b) of the provisional agenda

MSN 047 June 2014 MANX SHIPPING NOTICE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Heavy Fuel Oil use by Fishing Vessels in the IMO Polar Code Arctic, 2015

Comparative analysis of ship efficiency metrics

PM 2.5 Impacts From Ship Emissions in the Pacific Northwest. Robert Kotchenruther Ph.D. EPA Region 10 NW-AIRQUEST Meeting, June

v. CRIMINAL INFORMATION Fed. R. Crim. P. 7 COOPERATIVE SUCCESS MARITIME S.A.

2010 Air Emissions Inventory

ICOMIA Technical Guidance Note - Application of MARPOL Annex VI Tier III Regulation 13

Council of the European Union Brussels, 26 September 2016 (OR. en)

Recent Developments in International Seaborne Trade and Maritime Transport

Canadian Environmental Sustainability Indicators. Marine pollution spills

2008 Air Emissions Inventory SECTION 3 HARBOR CRAFT

Global Sulfur Cap

THE PORT OF LONG BEACH

Enforcement lessons learnt and future action

Effect of driving pattern parameters on fuel-economy for conventional and hybrid electric city buses

Current and Future Legislation

Maritime Security Challenges New Theatres of Maritime Operations: - The Polar Prospect

RESOLUTION MSC.286(86) (adopted on 5 June 2009) RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEETS (MSDS) FOR MARPOL ANNEX I OIL CARGO AND OIL FUEL

2012 Air Emissions Inventory

Strategic Approach for Shipping Modernization In the Thailand

Evaluation of photo voltaic generating system performance for fishing light application

HARMFUL AQUATIC ORGANISMS IN BALLAST WATER

Maritime Transport and the Climate Change Challenge

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Vehicular modal emission and fuel consumption factors in Hong Kong

Greece. Website. Contact points Flag State. EU Member State. Port State

LNG: Legal and regulatory framework. Canepa Monica World Maritime University

Emission factors, fuel consumption and emission estimates for Sweden s fishing fleet

Marine Circular 027 TEC REV 00/ NOVAVERITAS. Garbage Record book In accordance with IMO Res. MEPC.277(70)

Improving the Voyage Energy Efficiency by Using EEOI

SHIP ENERGY EFFICIENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN SEEMP. Edilberto Peralta Operations Manager Central and South America

Technical Publication. Guidelines for the development of ship's Data Collection Plan (SEEMP Part II) /

International and European Shipping Policies and the Protection of the Marine Environment

China Regulatory Update

Marine product guide. Engines and generator sets

CO 2 Emissions: A Campus Comparison

Document from the Ministry of Transport of the People s Republic of China

Vessel System Design & Application of Technology For a Responsible and Sustainable Maritime Industrial Sector

Presentation on. Energy efficiency measures in shipping from Operation and maintenance perspective

Running Vehicle Emission Factors of Passenger Cars in Makassar, Indonesia

COMMUNITY VESSEL TRAFFIC MONITORING AND INFORMATION SYSTEM --- CYPRUS MERCHANT MARINE CIRCULAR 14/2012

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER. Technical Annex. Accompanying the document REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

EVALUATION OF EMISSION FACTORS ON THE ESTIMATION OF NOX FORMATION FROM A MANOEUVRING SHIP D.G. Trodden, A.J. Murphy, K. Pazouki

Emission reduction in port with Cold Ironing: Italy national case study

Wave Power Generating Ships

RESOLUTION MEPC.251(66) Adopted on 4 April 2014

New Zealand s potential accession to International Maritime Organization treaty: MARPOL Annex VI: Prevention of Air Pollution from Ships

REPUBLIC OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS

ST. VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES

INFLUENCE OF THE MARINE 4-STROKE DIESEL ENGINE MALFUNCTIONS ON THE NITRIC OXIDES EMISSION

Emission Factor of Carbon Dioxide from In-Use Vehicles in Thailand

ST. VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES

Technical Report TR-22. Appendix Q

ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA. Annotations to the provisional agenda, list of documents and provisional timetable. Note by the Secretariat SUMMARY

China s Port and Ship Emission Control Strategy

Azerbaijan. Website TRACECA country. Contact points Flag State. Port State. Coastal State Marine Accidents Investigations

Transcription:

Jurnal Teknologi Full paper Prediction of CO 2 Emitted by Marine Transport in Batam-Singapore Channel using AIS M. Rashidi a, Jaswar a,b* a Department of Aeronautic, Automotive and Ocean Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia b Ocean and Aerospace Research Institute, Indonesia *Corresponding author: jaswar@fkm.utm.my and jaswar.koto@gmail.com Article history Received :20 March 2014 Received in revised form : 2 April 2014 Accepted :22 May 2014 Graphical abstract Abstract Global warming and air pollution have become one of the important issues to the entire world community. Exhaust emissions from ships has been contributing to the health problems and environmental damage. This study focuses on the Strait of Malacca area because it is one of the world s most congested straits used for international shipping where located on the border among three countries of Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore. This study will predict CO2 emission from the marine transport. This is accomplished by developed a ship database in the Straits of Malacca by using the data which obtained from Automatic Identification System (AIS). From the database, MEET methodology is used to estimate the CO2 emission from ships. Keywords: AIS; CO2; carbon dioxide; emission; distribution 2014 Penerbit UTM Press. All rights reserved. 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Strait of Malacca is one of the most important shipping channels in the world which is connecting the Indian Ocean with the South China Sea and the Pacific Ocean. At approximately 805 kilometers long, the Strait of Malacca is the longest Strait in the world used for international navigation (Wikipedia, 2013). The Strait of Malacca is a narrow stretch of water lying between the east coast of Sumatra Island in Indonesia and the west coast of Peninsular Malaysia, and is linked to Singapore at its southeast end. The Strait of Malacca varies in width from 200 miles to 11 miles with irregular depths from over 70 to less than 10 meters (SJICL, 1998). The Strait of Malacca remains as one of the world most congested straits used for international shipping. From the study by Jaswar (2013), it shows that daily 1500 vessels approximately pass through the Strait of Malacca which is 42 percent was under Singaporean flag. These consist of a wide spectrum of different types of vessels with 32 percent of Liquid bulk and 11 percent of container ships. With this number of ship, it will leave environmental impact such as Greenhouse gas emission. CO2 emissions from shipping is estimated to be 4 to 5 percent of the global total, and estimated by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) to rise by as much as 72 percent by 2020 if no action is taken (Vidal, 2007). IMO (2009) study of greenhouse gas (GHG) shows total exhaust emission from shipping from 1990 to 2007 and can see that there are increases of exhaust emission every year. This paper discusses the prediction of CO2 emission by marine transport. 2.0 AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM (AIS) Automatic Identification System (AIS) firstly has been used to comply with safety and security regulations, functioning as collision avoidance, vessel traffic services, maritime security, aids to navigation, search and rescue and accident investigation. The AIS is meant to be used primarily as a means of lookout and to determine the risk of collision rather than as an automatic collision avoidance system, in accordance with the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea (IMO, 1998). Primary data of ships which obtained from an AIS receiver in the study are MMSI of the ship, IMO number, receive time, position of the ship (longitude and latitude), speed of ground (SOG) and COG. These all the data obtained from an AIS receiver installed in Marine Technology Laboratory (Marine Technology Center (MTC)), Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, UniversitiTeknologi Malaysia (UTM). Information of ships based on AIS is not complete to use as the basis for calculation. AIS only provides several initial data such as MMSI, IMO number, position of ships (longitude and latitude), Speed Over Ground (SOG), Centre of Gratify (COG) and true heading of the ship. 69:7 (2014) 121 126 www.jurnalteknologi.utm.my eissn 2180 3722

122 M. Rashidi & Jaswar / Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering) 69:7 (2014), 121 126 Gross Tonnage (GT) data for calculation of emission rate as explained by Trozzi C. (2010) is obtained from other references such as marinetraffic.com, maritime-connector.com, equasis.org, vesseltracker.com and Equasis.org. The combination of all the data will make a complete database that can be used for the calculation. 3.0 CARBON DIOXIDE Carbon dioxide (CO2) is a colorless, odorless, non-flammable gas that is a product of cellular respiration and burning of fossil fuels. It has a molecular weight of 44.01g/Mol (NIOSH, 1976). Although it is typically present as a gas, carbon dioxide also can be a solid form as dry ice and liquefied, depending on temperature and pressure (Nelson, 2000). Carbon dioxide is not only a gas which affects the heat flow to and from the atmosphere of the earth, but is also a serious pollutant in its own right (Robertson, 2006). The concentration of this gas in the atmosphere is not known to have risen above 320 ppm over the last 40,000 years (Neftal et al., 1982). Evidence demonstrates this to be the case for the past 420,000 years (Petit et al., 1999). Several researches suggest that carbon dioxides also give effect to the Physiological. Although the safe working level of carbon dioxide is presently set at 5000 ppm for an 8 h day 40 h working week, no human ever endures such a level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere for 24 h a day, 365 days a year, for an entire lifetime nor has any human ever bred offspring under these conditions. This includes workers in breweries and the greenhouse industry, where the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere either commonly reaches or is set at a maximum of 900 ppm (Robertson, 2006). Methodologies for estimating air pollutant emissions from ships, in port environment and in navigation have been developed for one of the framework of the MEET project (Methodologies for estimating air pollutant emissions from transport). The methodology has been developed under the transport RTD program of the European Commission fourth framework program (EEA). MEET Methodology was adopted by Trozzi et al. (1998), Trozzi et al. (1999) and Pitana et al. (2010) for estimating emissions from ships. Methodologies for estimating air pollutant emissions from ships used to estimate of consumption and emissions based on present day statistics of ship traffic (Trozzi et al., 1998). The methodology is used by consider twelve ship class of ship with a gross tonnage above 100 GT. The data need such as emission factors, fuel consumption of ship, type of engine, etc. Fuel consumption of any type of ships are obtained from a linear regression analysis of fuel consumption to gross tonnage as shown in the Table 1. Table 2 shown the emission factor in each phases and Table 3 shown the fraction of maximum fuel consumption in different mode of the ship. It will be used to calculate the emission rate of each vessel. Table 1 Average consumption at full power versus gross tonnage Ship types Solid Bulk (SB) Liquid Bulk /Tanker (LB) General Cargo (GC) Container (CO) Ro-Ro Cargo (PC) Passenger (PA) High Speed Ferry (HS) Inland Cargo (IC) Sail Ship (SS) Tugs (TU) Fishing (FI) Other Ships (OT) Consumption at full power (t/day) as function of gross tonnage Cjk = 20.1860 + 0.00049 GT Cjk = 14.6850 + 0.00079 GT Cjk = 9.8197 + 0.00143 GT Cjk = 8.0552 + 0.00235 GT Cjk = 12.8340 + 0.00156 GT Cjk = 16.9040 + 0.00198 GT Cjk = 39.4830 + 0.00972 GT Cjk = 9.8197 + 0.00143 GT Cjk = 0.4268 + 0.00100 GT Cjk = 5.6511 + 0.01048 GT Cjk = 1.9387 + 0.00448 GT Cjk = 9.7126 + 0.00091 GT Table 2 Emission factors (kg/ton of fuel) Phases Engine types CO2 Cruising Steam turbines - BFO 3200 Steam turbines - MDO 3200 High speed diesel engines 3200 Medium speed diesel engines 3200 Slow speed diesel engines 3200 Gas turbines 3200 Pleasure Inboard diesel 3200 Pleasure Inboard gasoline 3000 Outboard gasoline engines 3000 Manoeuvring Steam turbines BFO 3200 Steam turbines MDO 3200 High speed diesel engines 3200 Medium speed diesel engines 3200 Slow speed diesel engines 3200 Gas turbines 3200 Pleasure Inboard diesel 3200 Pleasure Inboard gasoline 3000 Outboard gasoline engines 3000 Hotelling Steam turbines BFO 3200 Steam turbines MDO 3200 High speed diesel engines 3200 Medium speed diesel engine 3200 Slow speed diesel engines 3200 Gas turbines 3200 Pleasure Inboard diesel Pleasure Inboard gasoline Outboard gasoline engines neg. neg. neg. Tanker load. /off-load. 3200

123 M. Rashidi & Jaswar / Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering) 69:7 (2014), 121 126 Table 3 Fraction of maximum fuel consumption in different mode Mode Fraction Cruising 0.8 Manoeuvring 0.4 Hotelling default 0.2 passenger 0.32 liquid bulk 0.2 other 0.12 Tug: ship assistance 0.2 moderate activity 0.5 under tow 0.8 To calculate the emission rate of each vessel based on the assumption of the above tables (Table 1 to 6), Trozzi et al. (1998) using the following equation: E i = Σ jklm E ijklm (1) With E ijklm = S jkm (GT) t jklm F ijlm (2) Code SE HS MS SS IP OP TO Code SB LB GC CO PC PA HS IC SS TU FI OT Table 5 Engine types classification Name Steam turbines High speed motor engines Medium speed motor engines Slow speed motor engines Inboard engines - pleasure craft(only for detailed methodology) Outboard engines(only for detailed methodology) Tanker loading and off-loading(only for detailed methodology) Table 6 Ship types classification Name Solid Bulk Liquid Bulk General Cargo Container Ro-Ro Cargo Passenger High speed ferries Inland Cargo Sail ships Tugs Fishing Other where, i pollutant j fuel (see Table 4) k ship class for use in consumption classification (see Table 5) l engines type class for use in emission factors characterization s reference reduction scenario (low, medium, high) E i total emissions of pollutant i E ijklm total emissions of pollutant i from use of fuel j on ship class kwith engines type l in mode operation m S jkm (GT)daily consumption of fuel j in ship class k as a function of gross tonnage tjklm days in navigation of ships of class k with engines type l using fuel j in mode operational m Fijlm average emission factors of pollutant i from fuel j in engines type l in mode m Codes RO DO DF GF Residual oils Distillate oil Diesel fuel Gasoline fuel Table 4 Fuels classification Name Calculation of emission and the concentration are performed by using programming. The high number of calculation and output of the calculation becomes an issue when it calculated by manually. The programming which used for this step is Microsoft Visual Studio 2010 as seen in Figure 1 to 3. 4.0 CASE STUDY Calculation of emission is estimated for every ship which is recorded by AIS on September 2, 2011 at 7.00am - 8.00am. There were 813 total number of ships are counted. Calculations of emission based on the standard European (MEET) methodology which adopted by Trozzi et.al (1998). The result is presented in percentage as shown in Table 7, 8 & 9 and Figure 4, 5, & 6. The calculations by considering several factors are: i. Gross Tonnage (GT) ii. Type of ship iii. Mode operation of ship iv. Fuel type v. Main engine and auxiliary engine power

124 M. Rashidi & Jaswar / Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering) 69:7 (2014), 121 126 Table 7 CO2 emission by type of ship in Batam-Singapore channel Cod e Type Number of Ship CO2 g/ton of fuel persecond CO2 Percentage by ship Type Figure 1 Marine navigation tracking system SB Solid Bulk 49 729.930 6.58 LB Liquid Bulk 372 4549.125 41.009% GC General Cargo 51 305.843 2.757% CO Container 124 4220.972 38.051% PC Ro-Ro Cargo 3 28.233 0.255% PA Passenger 12 45.098 0.407% HS Highspeed ferries 1 3.257 0.029% TU Tugs 138 524.526 4.728% FI Fishing 1 8.548 0.077% OT Other 62 677.468 6.107% Unknown 360 Unknown Unknown Total Number of Ship 1173 11092.999 100.00 Total correspondent ship 813 CO2 Percentage by ship Type High speed ferries Tugs 5% Fishing Other 6% Solid Bulk 7% Passenger Ro-Ro Cargo Container 38% Liquid Bulk 41% Figure 2 Environmental impact caused by marine navigation in Batam- Singapore channel General Cargo 3% Figure 4 Percentage of CO2 emission by types of ship Table 8 CO2 emission by flag caused by marine navigation in Batam- Singapore channel Figure 3 CO2 Emission caused by marine navigation in Batam-Singapore Channel Flag Number of CO2 g/ton of CO2 % Ship fuel) per-second by Flag Singapore 344 2513.719 22.66% Malaysia 28 183.373 1.65% China People s Republic 8 151.466 1.37% Cyprus 11 206.808 1.86% Bahamas 14 384.639 3.47% Hong Kong, China 21 523.411 4.72% Indonesia 28 163.281 1.47% Liberia 54 1440.845 12.99% Marshall Islands 29 566.050 5.1 Panama 110 2346.478 21.15% Vietnam 11 96.492 0.87% Malta 13 189.227 1.71% Others Flag 142 2327.211 20.98% Total Ship 813 11092.999 100.0

125 M. Rashidi & Jaswar / Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering) 69:7 (2014), 121 126 CO2 Percentage by Flag Malta 2% vietnam 1% Others Flag 21% Singapore 23% China Peoples's Republic 1% Malaysia 2% Panama 21% liberia 13% Cyprus 2% Bahamas 3% Marshall Islands 5% Hong Kong, China 5% Indonesia 1% Figure 7 Distribution of AIS Receptor and CO2 emission caused marine navigation Figure 5 channel Percentage of CO2 emission by flag in Batam-Singapore Table 9 CO2 emission by mode operational in Batam-Singapore channel Mode Operational Ship Number CO2 g/ton of fuel) per second CO2 % by Mode Operational Manoeuvring 96 1366.06 12.33% Cruising 71 2015.78 18.2 Hotteling 644 7692.95 69.46% Unknown 2 0 0.0 Total Ship 813 11074.8 100.0 CO2 Percentage by Mode Operational Hotteling 7 Unknown Manoeuvring 12% Cruising 18% Figure 6 Percentage of CO2 emission by mode operational in Batam- Singapore channel 4.0 CONCLUSION Based on the result shown in Table 8 and Figure 5, ships under the Singapore flag is the high number of ships in the Strait of Malacca on September 2nd 2011 at 7.00 am-08.00 am. There 344 numbers of Singapore's ships and produces the highest emission of CO2 by amount of 2513.718 g/second. Other than ships under Singapore flag, ships under Panama and Liberia flag are the followed ships that most produces the emission. Ships under Malaysia and Indonesia rank of sixth and seventh which produces the emission at the time. In addition, container ship is the highest which produces emission followed by liquid bulk ship (tanker), solid bulk (bulk carrier) and Tugboat. Figure 7 show the distribution of AIS receptor and CO2 emission in the study area. Acknowledgement The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge their gratitude to Universiti Teknologi Malaysia for support this research. References [1] IMO (International Maritime Organization). 1998. IMO Resolution MSC.74 (69). Recommendation on Performance Standards for A Universal Ship borne Automatic Identification System (AIS). [2] IMO. 2009. Second IMO GHG Study 2009. International Maritime Organization (IMO), 4 Albert Embankments, London SE1 7SR Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711 [3] Jaswar, M. Rashidi, A. Maimun. 2013. Tracking of Ships Navigation in the Strait of Malacca Using Automatic Identification System. Developments in Maritime Transportation and Exploitation of Sea Resources. Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-1-138-00124-4. [4] National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). 1976. Criteria for a Recommended Standard, Occupational Exposure to Carbon Dioxide. August 1976. [5] Neftal, A., Oeschger, H., Schwander, J., Steuffer, B. and Zumbrunn, R. 1982. Ice Core Sample Measurement Gives Atmospheric CO2 Content over the Past 40,000 yr. Nature. 295: 220 223. [6] Nelson, L. 2000. Carbon Dioxide Poisoning. Emerg. Medicine. 32(5): 36 38. Summary of Physiological Effects and Toxicology of CO2 on Humans. [7] Robertson, D. S. 2006. Health Effects of Increase in Concentration of Carbon Dioxide in the Atmosphere. Current Science. 90(12): 25 June 2006. [8] SJICL. 1998. Navigation Safety in the Strait of Malacca. Singapore Journal of International & Comparative Law. 468 485.

126 M. Rashidi & Jaswar / Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering) 69:7 (2014), 121 126 [9] Trozzi, C. 2010. Update of Emission Estimate Methodology for Maritime Navigation, Techne Consulting report ETC.EF.10 DD, May 2010. [10] Vidal, J. 2007. CO 2 Output from Shipping Twice as Much as Airlines. The Guardian. London.