Unified Corridor Investment Study DRAFT Step 2 Scenario Analysis Report

Similar documents
Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study

State Route 1 Auxiliary Lane Bus-on-Shoulder Concept of Operations DRAFT. Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission

RTID Travel Demand Modeling: Assumptions and Method of Analysis

Table Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily

City of Pacific Grove

Chapter 9 Recommended Locally Preferred Alternative and Alternatives for Evaluation in Draft SEIS/SEIR

State Avenue Corridor Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)

2030 Multimodal Transportation Study

Chapter 7. Transportation Capital Improvement Projects. Chapter 7

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

ARTERIAL BRT OVERVIEW

City of Marina. Regional Roundabout Study Utilizing Caltrans Intersection Control Evaluation Section 4: Transportation Agency for Monterey County

SERVICE DESIGN GUIDELINES

HDR Engineering. HART North / South. Tampa Bay Applications Group Meeting May 14, 2009

STATE ROUTE 1 HOV LANE WIDENING PROJECT (FROM MORRISSEY BOULEVARD TO SAN ANDREAS ROAD)

Develop ground transportation improvements to make the Airport a multi-modal regional

CEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update

TBARTA USF to Wesley Chapel Express Bus Service Operating Plan. Draft 3/25/2014

Snelling Bus Rapid Transit. May 13, 2013 Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #1

Alternatives Analysis Findings Report

EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT

BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY

Madison BRT Transit Corridor Study Proposed BRT Operations Plans

Memorandum. 1 Introduction. 2 O&M Cost Elements. 2.1 Service O&M Costs

Mobility Corridor Updates. Transit & Active Transportation Projects

More than $9 Million coming to Central Valley for transportation

Preliminary Definition of Alternatives. 3.0 Preliminary Definition of Alternatives

VAN NESS AVENUE BUS RAPID TRANSIT

MONTEREY BAY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DETAILED SUMMARY OF FINAL APPLICATIONS

Van Ness Transit Corridor Improvement Project. Engineering, Maintenance and Safety Committee March 25, 2015

Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Candidate Project List for Public Review

Executive Summary. Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Priority Corridor Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis October 13, 2009.

US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017

Operating & Maintenance Cost Results Report

Perry City 1200 West Walking/ Biking Path Project Type Pedestrian/ Bike

Santa Cruz Branch Rail Line Rail Transit Feasibility Study

NET TOLL REVENUE REINVESTMENT GRANT PROGRAM. South Bay Service Council

Service Quality: Higher Ridership: Very Affordable: Image:

APPENDIX B Traffic Analysis

V03. APTA Multimodal Operations Planning Workshop August Green Line LRT

APPENDIX I: [FIXED-GUIDEWAY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY]

4.0 TIER 2 ALTERNATIVES

Troost Corridor Transit Study

Recommendation for 2017 PSRC Funding Transportation Policy Board - June 8, 2017

I-405 and SR 522/NE 145th Bus Rapid Transit. Elected Leadership Groups Meeting November 30, 2018

Sepulveda Pass Corridor Systems Planning Study

Transit Access to the National Harbor

Transit on the New NY Bridge

Bi-County Transitway/ Bethesda Station Access Demand Analysis

IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS

I-405 Corridor Master Plan

East Bay Bus Rapid Transit Project. Downtown Oakland to San Leandro International Blvd to East 14 th St

Draft Results and Recommendations

Public Works. Capital Projects FY

WELCOME. Transit Options Amherst - Buffalo Public Workshops

Brigham City 1200 West Box Elder Creek Bridge - Widening Project Type Reconstruction

2016 PSRC REGIONAL & KING COUNTYWIDE EASTSIDE FUNDING AWARDS. Eastside Transportation Partnership September 9, 2016

STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Report

Draft Results and Open House

1.0 Detailed Definition of Alternatives

Mississauga Bus Rapid Transit Preliminary Design Project

Transit Access Study

Highway Transitway Corridor Study

3.15 SAFETY AND SECURITY

APPENDIX H. Transportation Impact Study

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017

US 59 (SOUTHWEST FWY) IH 610 (West Loop) to SH 288 (South Fwy)

TPA Steering Committee for Tri-Rail Extension to Northern Palm Beach County. February 26, 2018

Rail~Volution 2005 Hal Ryan Johnson, AICP, Bus Rapid Transit Project Manager Utah Transit Authority September 7, 2005

Sepulveda Pass Corridor Systems Planning Study Update

CITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6

Transit on the SC Rail Corridor

Travel Forecasting Methodology

Agenda. Utility Undergrounding Strategies & Laguna Canyon Road Master Plan

Metro Transit Update. Christina Morrison, Senior Planner Metro Transit BRT/Small Starts Project Office. John Dillery, Senior Transit Planner

San Rafael Transit Center. Update. Golden Gate Bridge, Highway & Transportation District Transportation Committee of the Board of Directors

ANDERSON PROPERTY SITE ANALYSIS

Public Meeting. City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development

4.14 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION

DRAFT METROCENTER CORRIDOR STUDY

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

The capital cost estimates do not include allowances for: ROW acquisition. Third-party mitigation works. Hazardous materials handling.

TPB CLRP Aspirations Scenario

3. PRELIMINARY DEFINITION OF ALTERNATIVES

MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM RESEARCH INSTITUTE (MBARI) MASTER PLAN UPDATE MOSS LANDING, CALIFORNIA

Sales and Use Transportation Tax Implementation Plan

We Want Your Input! Review the design alternatives and tell us what s important to you in the design of these areas of the approved BRT Network:

Appendix J Traffic Impact Study

2.0 INTRODUCTION. Around the Bay Rail Study LS Transit Systems, Inc. in association with DKS & Nelson\Nygaard

PAWG Meeting #3a Tier 1 Evaluation

Public Meeting. June 15, :30 7:30 p.m.

4 COSTS AND OPERATIONS

Table 8-1: Service Frequencies for All Short-List Alternatives by Day of Week and Time of Day Frequency Day of Week Time of Day Time Period

Michigan/Grand River Avenue Transportation Study TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #18 PROJECTED CARBON DIOXIDE (CO 2 ) EMISSIONS

WELCOME. Nanaimo Harbour and Gabriola Island Terminal Development Plans (TDPs)

Railyard Alternatives & I-280 Boulevard Feasibility Study 1 RAILYARD ALTERNATIVES & I-280 BOULEVARD (RAB) FEASIBILITY STUDY

Reston Transportation Strategy July 9, 2018

Richmond Area MPO Regional Priority Transportation Projects

TransNet Dollars Keep San Diego Moving

Swift Green Line April 11, 2019

Transcription:

Unified Corridor Investment Study DRAFT Step 2 Scenario Analysis Report REVISIONS 1. Table 39: New Public Investments for Operation and Maintenance Costs 2. Appendix A-10: Passenger Rail Service - Operations and Maintenance Cost 3. Appendix A-11: Excursion Rail Service - Operations and Maintenance Cost 4. Appendix A-12: Bus Rapid Transit Watsonville to Santa Cruz on Rail Right-of-Way with portions of route on parallel roadways 5. Table 31: Collisions Forecast by Scenario 6. Figure 29: Comparison of Total collisions in Study Area by Scenario 7. Table 42: Costs Associated with the Number of collisions by Project and Scenario 8. Figure 34: Costs Associated with Collisions

REVISED 10/12/2018 Table 39: New Public Investments for Operation and Maintenance Costs Cost Estimates and Potential Funding Amounts by Project Scenario (All figures in year 2018, thousands of dollars) NEW PUBLIC INVESTMENT ANNUAL OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE () (IN THOUSANDS) Annual Cost- * Scenario A Scenario B Scenario C Scenario E Funding Potential- NEW Public Investment- Annual Cost- * Funding Potential- NEW Public Investment- Annual Cost- * Funding Potential- NEW Public Investment- Annual Cost- * Funding Potential- NEW Public Investment- Highway 1 Projects Buses on shoulders - (end point varies depending on aux lanes included) $3,500 $3,500 $0 $3,500 $3,500 $0 High occupancy vehicle lanes (HOV) & increased transit (Inc. Ramp Metering) $8,400 $2,900 $5,500 $8,400 $7,000 $1,400 Auxiliary lanes to extend merging distance $1,200 $1,200 $0 $1,200 $1,200 $0 $1,200 $1,200 $0 Metering of on-ramps w/o HOV (including intersection/ramp improvements) $0 $0 $0 Additional lanes on bridge over San Lorenzo River $23 $23 $23 Mission St intersection improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Subtotal- Highway 1 $9,600 $5,500 $3,500 $0 $4,700 $0 $9,600 $1,400 Soquel Avenue/Drive and Freedom Blvd Bus rapid transit lite See cell below See cell below See cell below See cell below See cell below See cell below See cell below See cell below See cell below Increased frequency of transit with express service $14,300 $11,100 $3,200 $14,300 $8,000 $6,300 $14,300 $4,200 $10,100 Buffered/protected bike lanes $170 $170 $0 $170 $170 $0 Intersection improvements for bikes/pedestrians/auto $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Subtotal- Soquel/Freedom $14,300 $3,200 $14,500 $6,300 $14,300 $10,100 $170 $0 Rail Corridor Bike and pedestrian trail $606 $606 $0 $606 $606 $0 $606 $606 $0 $606 $606 $0 Local rail transit with interregional connections** $16,200 $12,500 $3,700 $14,700 $13,300 $1,400 Bus transit connections to rail transit $12,100 $6,100 $6,000 $12,100 $9,300 $2,800 Bus rapid transit $10,000 $9,600 $400 Freight service on rail $275 $275 $0 $1,500 $1,500 $0 Subtotal Rail ROW $606 $0 $28,900 $9,700 $10,900 $400 $28,900 $4,200 SCENARIO TOTAL***(2018 dollars) $24,500 $15,800 $8,700 $46,900 $30,800 $16,100 $29,900 $19,300 $10,600 $38,700 $33,100 $5,700 *Annual Operations and Maintenance includes costs for all new transit (rail/bus rapid transit/bus) service vehicle operations and vehicle maintenance. Also includes facility maintenance costs for trail projects, bus rapid transit on the Santa Cruz Branch Rail Line as applicable by scenario and passenger rail service. Facility cost maintenance for passenger rail service as assumed to be shared 50/50 between RTC and the Rail Operator when freight service is also provided. The annual cost of facility maintenance on state highways are allocated by Caltrans and facility maintenance on local roads are allocated by local jurisdictions. Therefore the annual maintenance cost estimated for projects included in the UCS within Caltrans and local jurisdictions right-of-way are fully funded by the these entities and the new level of public investment is zero for the purpose of the UCS. **For Scenarios B and E with rail transit, costs are for diesel multiple units. Operations and maintenance of an electric rail service is estimated to cost $13.2million annually. ***For Scenarios B and E with rail transit, costs are for diesel multiple units. Electrifying rail and operating electrical multiple unit vehicles would I be less than maintenance for diesel multiple units and would be $11,800,000 annually. Unified Corridor Investment Study- Draft Step 2 Analysis September 2018 2035 Forecast REVISED - Page 100

REVISED 10/12/2018 Project Limits Description Scope Natural Bridges Drive to Pajaro Station Table A-10: Passenger Rail Service Passenger rail transit service provided between the Westside of Santa Cruz and Pajaro Station just south of the Santa Cruz County border in Monterey County. The costs for a diesel multiple unit (DMU) vehicle train service* and the cost to electrify rail service are both evaluated. Replacement of all rail on portions of the line between Santa Cruz with continuously welded rail using goodquality second-hand rail. Replacement of 2/3 of rail ties, improve or replace turnouts and switches. Implement new signal and positive train control system to monitor and control train movements. Install new active warning devices at nineteen crossings and quiet zones at all thirty-three public at grade crossings. Construct stations with platforms, ticketing machines, bicycle racks and lockers and shelter similar to a bus shelter. Implement recommended improvements to structures as identified in 2012 JL Patterson Report. Provide forty-one hours of passenger rail transit per day with thirty-minute headway during the weekday from 6am to 9pm serving ten primary stations (Westside Santa Cruz, Bay Street/California, Downtown Santa Cruz, Seabright, 17th, 41st, Monterey Avenue, Aptos Village and Downtown Santa Cruz in Santa Cruz County) and one station at Pajaro in Monterey County. CAPITAL COSTS Track $30,700,000 Signal $16,400,000 Train Control $60,400,000 Structures $5,100,000 Stations / Maintenance Facility $27,800,000 Rail Vehicles $62,500,000 Soft Costs (30%) $60,900,000 Contingency (30%) $60,900,000 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS- CONSTRUCTION $324,700,000 Electrifying rail for passenger rail service between Santa Cruz and Pajaro is estimated to cost to $474.4 million. OPERATION & MAINTENANCE COSTS- RAIL TRANSIT Daily Revenue Hours Operating Cost per Hour Annual Operating Cost Rail Transit Service (weekday) 42 $573 $6,100,000 Rail Transit Service (weekend and holiday) 26 $573 $1,700,000 Vehicle - Soft Costs (40%) $3,100,000 Vehicle - Contingency (20%) $2,200,000 Scenario B Scenario E* Maintenance of right-of-way $2,200,000 $1,100,000 Maintenance of right-of-way- Contingency (15%) $300,000 $100,000 TOTAL PROJECT COST-OPERATIONS (RAIL) $15,600,000 $14,300,000 *Operating electrical multiple unit vehicles is estimated to cost $13.2 million. ** Facility cost maintenance for passenger rail service is assumed to be shared 50/50 between RTC and the Rail Operator when freight service is also provided. OPERATION COSTS- NEW LOCAL BUS TRANSIT CONNECTION TO RAIL Unified Corridor Investment Study- Draft Step 2 Analysis September 2018 2035 Forecast REVISED - Page 151

REVISED 10/12/2018 New Daily Revenue Hours Operating Cost per Hour Annual Operating Cost Route 55- increase service 16 $200 $800,000 Route 55 (weekend)- increase service 20 $200 $440,000 Route 66- realign & increase service 15 $200 $765,000 Route 68- increase service 15 $200 $765,000 Route 19- increase service 12 $200 $612,000 Route 22- increase service 15 $200 $510,000 Route 22- add year round service 30 $200 $510,000 Route 22- (weekend) - increase service 30 $200 $660,000 Route 57- increase service 45 $200 $2,300,000 Route 57 (weekend)- increase service 45 $200 $990,000 Route 65- increase service 15 $200 $765,000 Route 65 (weekend)- increase service 7.5 $200 $165,000 Contingency (30%) $2,800,000 TOTAL PROJECT COST-OPERATIONS (BUS) $12,100,000 Unified Corridor Investment Study- Draft Step 2 Analysis September 2018 2035 Forecast REVISED - Page 151

REVISED 10/12/2018 Project Table A-11: Excursion Rail Service Limits Description Scope Davenport to Santa Cruz Excursion rail service would be between Santa Cruz and Davenport seasonally on weekends and holidays. Adds new excursion passenger service on weekend and holidays between Santa Cruz and Davenport with four round trips per day. Rail transit cars used for passenger rail service from Santa Cruz to Pajaro will also be used for excursion rail service. Positive Train Control is not assumed for this section of track. CAPITAL COSTS Track $4,800,000 Signal $1,500,000 Train Control N/A Structures $721,000 Stations / Maintenance Facility $2,500,000 Rail Vehicles N/A Soft Costs (30%) $2,900,000 Contingency (30%) $2,900,000 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS- CONSTRUCTION $15,300,000 Electrifying rail for excursion rail service between Davenport is estimated cost $75.1 million. OPERATION & MAINTENANCE COSTS- RAIL TRANSIT New Daily Revenue Hours Operating Cost per Hour Annual Operating Cost Rail Transit Service (weekday) 0 $490 $- Rail Transit Service (weekend and holiday) 16 $490 $78,000 Soft Costs (38%) $30,000 Contingency (20%) $22,000 Scenario B Scenario E* Maintenance of right-of-way $400,000 $200,000 Maintenance of right-of-way- Contingency (15%) $20,000 $10,000 TOTAL PROJECT COST-OPERATIONS $600,000 $400,000 *Facility cost maintenance for passenger rail service as assumed to be shared 50/50 between RTC and the Rail Operator when freight service is also provided. Unified Corridor Investment Study- Draft Step 2 Analysis September 2018 2035 Forecast REVISED - Page 156

REVISED 10/12/2018 Project Limits Description Scope Table A-12: Bus Rapid Transit Watsonville to Santa Cruz on Rail Right of Way with portions of route on parallel roadways Watsonville Transit Center to Shaffer Rd on West side of Santa Cruz Two-directional bus rapid transit between Watsonville Transit Center and Shaffer Rd on Westside of Santa Cruz utilizing a combination of the rail right-of-way, Highway 1, and local streets. BRT on rail right of way from State Park Dr. in Aptos to Shaffer Rd on west side of Santa Cruz with portions of route on parallel street network. BRT buses would travel on Highway 1 between Watsonville Transit Center and State Park Drive. Buses utilize the rail ROW between State Park Dr. and Shaffer Rd for two directional travel where feasible or one-directional travel on rail ROW with reverse direction on parallel local streets. Bus Rapid Transit is on 8.5 miles of the rail ROW with a combination of two-way (2.4 miles) and oneway (6.1 miles) with reverse direction on parallel local streets. Service on bridges is one way and transit signals are utilized on the rail bridges to hold one direction of travel while transit in the other direction travels through. Buses are prioritized at at-grade roadway crossings. Bus Rapid Transit service will be branded and transit service and vehicle amenities are designed to be equivalent to those provided by rail transit to the extent possible. Provide one hundred and eighty-two hours of new bus transit service between Santa Cruz and Watsonville at fifteen-minute frequency s during peak periods to stations on the rail ROW and on parallel streets. Includes signal, on-street improvements and communication/lighting/electrical. CAPITAL COSTS Earthwork and Pavement $18,000,000 Drainage $5,000,000 Retaining Wall & Fencing $15,000,000 Rail Removal $2,000,000 Platforms & Stations $25,000,000 Signals, Signal Priority & Que Jumps $17,000,000 Amenities $11,000,000 Contingency (50%) $58,800,000 Structures $4,000,000 Articulated Buses 12 $1,400,000 $16,800,000 Other* $25,000,000 Soft Costs (30%) $67,100,000 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS- CONSTRUCTION $265,000,000 *Other includes cost associated with traffic control, construction mobilization, supplemental work, state furnished materials, and environmental cost identified using the Caltrans Cost Estimating Tool. Unified Corridor Investment Study- Draft Step 2 Analysis September 2018 2035 Forecast REVISED - Page 154

REVISED 10/15/2018 Table 31: Collision Forecasts by Scenario (Fatal, Injury, and Property Damage Only) Location Annual Average 2011-2015 Collisions 2035 No Build Annual Collisions 2035 Annual Collision Reductions Scenario A Scenario B Scenario C Scenario E Highway 1 HOV lanes (between San Andreas Rd and Morrissey Blvd) 317 297 0 0 SR 1 auxiliary lanes (between State Park Drive and San Andreas Road) Ramp metering (between San Andreas Road and Morrissey Blvd) 88 92-34 0-18 317 297-108 0-37 San Lorenzo River Bridge Widening 14 14-3 0 0 0 Mission St Intersections 30 30-2 -3 0 0 Soquel Ave/Drive and Freedom Blvd Buffered bicycle lanes 30 45 0-33 0-33 Soquel/Morrissey/Poplar, Soquel/Frederick, Soquel/41st, Soquel/Bay-Porter, Soquel/Robertson, Freedom/Green Valley, Freedom/Airport, Freedom/Buena Vista Intersection improvements for bicycles and pedestrians 61 76-15 0-12 0 24 36-14 -5-14 -5 Rail Right of Way Bicycle /Pedestrian Trail with Rail or BRT 33 50 0-45 -45-45 Bicycle /Pedestrian Trail Only 36 53-48 0 0 0 Overall Project Area Bicycle and pedestrian Improvements 87 130-13 -13-13 -13 Bike share and transit amenities 87 130-6 -6-6 -6 Multimodal transportation hubs 263 394-20 -20-20 -20 Education and enforcement 1110 1211-76 -114-113 -84 Total -232-346 -241-243 Unified Corridor Investment Study-Draft Step 2 Analysis 2035 Forecast September 2018 - page 82

REVISED 10/15/2018 Figure 29: Comparison of Total Collisions in Study Area by Scenario Total Annual Collisions Fatal, Injury, and Property Damage Only Scenario A, 979 Scenario A No Build, 1211 Baseline, 1110 Scenario B, 865 Scenario B No Build, 1211 Baseline, 1110 Scenario C, 970 Scenario C No Build, 1211 Baseline, 1110 Scenario E, 968 Scenario E No Build, 1211 Baseline, 1110 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 Unified Corridor Investment Study-Draft Step 2 Analysis 2035 Forecast September 2018 REVISED - page 83

REVISED 10/15/2018 Table 42: Costs Associated with the Number of Collisions by Project and Scenario Location 2015 Collisions 2035 No Build Collisions 2035 Collisions Scenario A 2035 Collisions Scenario B 2035 Collisions Scenario C 2035 Collisions Scenario E Reductions Savings Reduction Savings Reduction Savings Reduction Savings Highway 1 HOV lanes (between San Andreas Rd and Morrissey Blvd) SR 1 auxiliary lanes (between State Park Drive and San Andreas Road) Ramp metering (between San Andreas Road and Morrissey Blvd) San Lorenzo River Bridge Widening 317 297 0-0 - 88 92-34 $7,527,787 0 - -18 $4,087,826 317 297-108 $24,171,047 0 - -37 $8,193,973 14 14-3 $767,276 0-0 - 0 - Mission St Intersections 30 30-2 $456,393-3 $648,792 0-0 - Soquel Ave/Drive and Freedom Blvd Buffered bicycle lanes 30 45 0 - -33 $7,399,549 0 - -33 $7,399,549 Soquel/Morrissey/Poplar, Soquel/Frederick, Soquel/41st, Soquel/Bay-Porter, Soquel/Robertson, Freedom/Green Valley, Freedom/Airport, Freedom/Buena Vista Intersection improvements for bicycles and pedestrians Rail Right of Way Bicycle /Pedestrian Trail with Rail or BRT 61 76-15 $3,420,459 0 - -12 $2,585,566 0-24 36-14 $3,119,810-5 $1,013,938-14 $3,119,810-5 $1,013,938 33 50 0 - -45 $10,026,234-45 $10,026,234-45 $10,026,234 Bicycle /Pedestrian Trail Only 36 53-48 $10,751,022 0-0 - 0 - Overall Project Area Bicycle and pedestrian Improvements Bike share and transit amenities 87 130-13 $2,905,863-13 $2,905,863-13 2,905,863-13 $2,905,863 87 130-6 $1,452,932-6 $1,452,932-6 $1,452,932-6 $1,452,932 Multimodal transportation hubs 263 394-20 $4,409,127-20 $4,409,127-20 $4,409,127-20 $4,409,127 Education and enforcement 1109 1211-76 $17,060,033-114 $25,401,517-113 $25,274,985-84 $18,846,481 Total -232 $51,900,000-346 $77,500,000-241 $53,900,000-243 $54,300,000 Unified Corridor Investment Study-Draft Step 2 Analysis 2035 Forecast September 2018 REVISED - Page

REVISED 10/15/2018 Figure 34: Costs Associated with Collisions $271 Unified Corridor Investment Study-Draft Step 2 Analysis 2035 Forecast September 2018 REVISED - page