Hassan Ali, Erwan Sulaiman 2, Mohd Fairoz Omar, Mahyuzie Jenal Selected paper Design studies and performance of a novel 12S- 8P HEFSM with segmental JES Journal of Electrical Systems This paper present the design studies and performance of novel 12slot-8pole hybrid excitation flux switching motor (HEFSM) with segmental for various applications. Novel structure of HEFSM contains three PMs and three FECs for the excitation source to make the structure simple and smooth flux distribution over the stator and segments. The segmental has been used to obtain the shortest flux paths through the segments of unlike toothed structure. Besides, Finite Element Analysis (FEA) is used to examine the magnetic flux lines, flux strengthening, torque and power vs speed characteristics, losses and efficiency of proposed motor. As conclusion novel HEFSM achieved the torque 55% and power 61% more than the initial HEFSM along with 78.56% of efficiency which is suitable for various high speed motor applications. Keywords: Hybrid excitation; segmental ; flux lines; torque; efficiency. 1. Introduction Commercially, numerous electric machines have successfully been installed for various applications and drive systems such as interior permanent magnet synchronous motor (IPMSM), DC motor, switch reluctance machine (SRM), and induction motor (IM). The supremacy behind these employment have been advanced to enhance more power density of the machine despite of their successful operated as well as superior performances [1]. Nevertheless, several demerits of complex winding configurations in IPMSM, difficulty in controlling orthogonal position in DC motor, high vibration and noisy in SRM, and asynchronous speed and variety of faults in IM need to be resolved [2], [3]. Therefore researchers developed a new type of machine named flux-switching motor (FSM). The FSM is a form of salient- reluctance machine with a novel topology. It combines the principles of the inductor generator and the switched reluctance machine (SRM) [4], [5]. FSM works on the concept that involves changing the polarity of the flux linking the armature winding, as the rotates [6], [7]. FSMs are categorised in to three types field excitation flux switching motors (FEFSM), permanent magnet flux switching motors (PMFSM) and hybrid excitation flux switching motors (HEFSM) [8]. HEFSMs are those which employ primary excitation by permanent magnets (PMs) along with DC field excitation coil (FEC) as a secondary source as shown in Figure 1. Generally, permanent magnet flux switching machines (PMFSMs) have relatively poor flux weakening performance but can be operated beyond base speed in the flux weakening region by means of controlling the armature winding current [9]. HEFSM has significantly less magnet and higher torque density than those of a conventional PMFSM. To easily adjust the main flux, which is fixed in PMFSM. HEFSM were developed to improve the * Corresponding author: Hassan Ali, Erwan Sulaiman, Resarch Center for Electromagnetics, Faculty of Electrical and Electronics, Unuversiti Tun Hussien Onn Malaysia, E-mail: engg.hassansoomro@gmail.com, erwan@uthm.edu.my. 1 Faculty of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Unuversiti Tun Hussien Onn Malaysia, 6400 Parit Raja, batu Pahat, Johor, Malaysia.
starting/low-speed torque and high-speed flux-weakening capabilities, which are required for various special applications [10], [11]. In recent work, the authors developed the use of a segmental construction for SRMs and single-phase FSMs, which gives significant gains over other topologies. Whereas segmental s are used traditionally to control the saliency ratio in synchronous reluctance machines [12], [13], the primary function of the segments in this design is to provide a defined magnetic path for conveying the field flux to adjacent stator armature coils as the rotates. As each coil arrangement is around a single tooth, this design gives shorter end windings than with the toothed- structure which is associated with overlapping coils. There are significant gains with this arrangement as it uses less conductor materials and may improve the overall motor efficiency [14] In more recent, initial structure 1of 2S-8P HEFSM with segmental has been developed using six armature coils and six permanent magnets as shown in Figure 2, but due to cancellation of fluxes produced by both sources, the torque, power and efficiency achieved is less as compared to existing designs [15]. In this paper a novel structure of 12S-8P HEFSM with segmental is presented using only three PMs and three FECs as shown in Figure 3. (a) (b) Figure.1. (a) 6S-4P HEFSM (b) 12S-10P inner FE HEFSM 45
International Conference on Advanced Mechanics, Power and Energy 2015 (AMPE2015), 5-6 December 2015, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Armature coil FEC Stator PM Segmental Figure. 2. Initial 12S-8P HEFSM with segmental having six PMs and six FECs 2. Design restrictions, specifications, and Design Methodology The design restrictions, specification and the parameters of novel structure HEFSM with segmental are used similar as in initial HEFSM with segmental structure as listed in Table 1. To avoid the flux cancellation produced in initial HEFSM, three FECs and three PMs are eliminated from initial HEFSM to produce novel HEFSM with segmental as shown in Figure 3.The volume of PM used is 0.16kg while the number of turns of FEC and armature coils used are 39. The maximum limit of current density of armature coil and FEC is set up to 30Arms/mm 2 and 30A/mm 2 respectively. When employing segmental structure, the use of 12 stator slots is the minimum balanced requirement of three phase configuration, while using 8 segments is influenced by best performance requirements [10]. Using FEA simulation, designs of HEFSM examined via JMAGdesigner ver. 13.0 released by Japan Research Institute (JRI). Besides, the maximum voltage and current of the inverter is set at 650 V, and 360 Arms, respectively. 3. Design result and performance 3.1. Magnetic flux lines and flux strengthening The magnetic flux lines produced by PMs and mmf of FECs up to its maximum current density of 30A/mm 2 for initial and novel HEFSM are illustrated in Figure. 4 and Figure 5 respectively and is clear from figures that novel HEFSM has better flux distribution with short cycles than initial HEFSM. Whilst figure 6 illustrates the flux strengthening of both designs. From Figure 6, it is obvious the initially by applying the field current the flux strengthening is increased up to 52mWb afterward by increasing field current density the flux strength is almost constant due to obvious cancellation of fluxes as shown in Figure 4. Furthermore in case of novel HEFSM fluxes are combined properly and produced the flux strengthening of 57mWb at field current density of 15A/mm2, which is almost 8% more 46
than the initial design. Although by increasing the current density the flux strengthening is not increased more due to the reason of flux leakages that can be reduced by further design refinement and optimization Table 1: Design specification of 12S-8P HEFSM with segmental Items HEFSM with segmental Number of slots 12 Number of segments 8 Stator outer radius [mm] 75 Stator back inner width [mm] 11 Stator tooth width [mm] 12.5 Number of FE coils 3 Number armature coils 6 Number of PMs 3 Volume of PM used [kg] 0.16 Rotor outer radius [mm] 45 Rotor inner radius [mm] 30 Air gap length [mm] 0.3 Span of the Segment [degrees] 40 0 FEC Stator Armature coil PM Segmental Figure. 3. A novel structure of 12S-8P HEFSM with segmental. 47
International Conference on Advanced Mechanics, Power and Energy 2015 (AMPE2015), 5-6 December 2015, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 3.2. Torque and Power vs Speed Characteristics The torque vs speed characteristics of the initial HEFSM and novel HEFSM with segmental are shown in Figure 8 and Figure 9 respectively. From figure blue and red lines show the torque and power vs speed characteristics of both designs respectively, it is noticeable from figure 8, that initial HEFSM achieved the torque of 17Nm at base speed of 2,000rpm, while in case of novel HEFSM from figure 9, maximum torque achieved is 38Nm at base speed of 2195rpm that is almost 55% more than the initial HEFSM. Stator Magnetic flux lines Segmental Stator Figure. 4. Magnetic flux lines of initial HEFSM Magnetic flux lines PM Segment Figure. 5. Magnetic flux lines of novel HEFSM 48
Figure. 6. Flux Strengthening of initial and novel HEFSM Flux cancellation Figure. 7. Flux lines cancellation in initial HEFSM Figure. 8. Torque and power vs speed 49 Figure. 9 Torque and power vs speed charecteristices of novel HEFSM
International Conference on Advanced Mechanics, Power and Energy 2015 (AMPE2015), 5-6 December 2015, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Charecteristices of initial HEFSM Furthermore it is also clear from figures that the maximum power achieved by initial HEFSM is approximately 3.5kw at speed of 2000rpm and decreasing as speed is increased due to the copper and core losses. However in case of novel HEFSM, the maximum power achieved at maximum torque of 38Nm is approximately 9kw almost 61% when the speed is 2,095rpm. 3.3. Motor loss and efficiency analysis Motor losses that are copper losses of FEC and armature coil, and iron losses in all laminated cores and efficiency of motor has been calculated on the basis of 2-D FEA. The specific operating points such as at the maximum torque, high speed, and frequent operating points under light load driving condition are selected for motor losses and efficiency analysis, and are noted as No. 1 to No. 8 for initial and novel HEFSM are shown in Figure 10 and Figure 11 respectively and for these operating points, the detailed loss analyses of both designs summarized in Figure. 12 and 13. Where Pi is iron loss, Pc copper loss and Po is total losses. From figure 10, it is obvious that at high torque operating point No. 1, the motor efficiency initial HEFSM achieved approximately 53.4%. Meanwhile at maximum speed operating point No. 2, efficiency achieved by initial HEFSM is approximately 37.4%. These efficiencies are reduced due to increase in iron and copper losses in initial HEFSM. However at frequent operating points noted as No.3 to No. 7 under load conditions, initial HEFSM has achieved the efficiency of 67.26%. Figure. 10. Losses and efficiencies at different operating points for initial HEFSM 50
Figure. 11. Losses and efficiencies at different operating points for novel HEFSM Figure. 12. Loss analysis of initial HEFSM at different operating points. Figure. 13. Loss analysis of novel HEFSM at different operating points In addition from Figure 11, at high torque operating point No. 1, the motor efficiency of novel HEFSM achieved is approximately 77%. At maximum speed operating point No. 2, efficiency achieved is approximately 74%. On the other hand at frequent operating points noted as No.3 to No. 7 under load conditions, novel HEFSM has achieved the efficiency of 78.56%. 51
International Conference on Advanced Mechanics, Power and Energy 2015 (AMPE2015), 5-6 December 2015, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 5. Conclusion This paper has presented the design studies of novel 12slot 8pole HEFSM with segmental for various applications. The magnetic flux lines, flux strengthening, torque and power vs speed characteristics and efficiencies have been investigated based on 2-D FEA. The goal of this research for an extension in speed and torque ranges has been accomplished. The simple structure of novel HEFSM with three PMs and three FECs has achieved 55% torque and 61% power more than the initial HEFSM at higher speed ranges. Meanwhile novel HEFSM has achieved the high efficiency of approximately 78.5% that is suitable for various high speed applications. Acknowledgement This was supported by Research, innovation, commercialization, consultancy management under Vote No. E15501/ U241, University Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM References [1] M. Z. Ahmad, E. Sulaiman, Z. A. Haron, and T. Kosaka, Preliminary Studies on a New Outer-Rotor Permanent Magnet Flux Switching Machine with Hybrid Excitation Flux for Direct Drive EV Applications, IEEE International Conference on Power and Energy, 2 5, 2012. [2] E. Sulaiman, T. Kosaka, and N. Matsui, Design optimization and performance of a novel 6-slot 5-pole PMFSM with hybrid excitation for hybrid electric vehicle, IEEE Transaction Industry Applications. 132, (2), 211-218, 2012. [3] J.K. Kammoun, N. Ben, Hadj, M. Ghariani, Induction Motor Finite Element Analysis for EV Application, Torque Ripple and Inter-turn circuit, Journal of Electrical Systems(JES), 11(4), 447-462, 2015. [4] J. H. Walker, The theory of the inductor alternator, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 89(9), 227 241, 1942. [5] S. E. Rauch and L. J. Johnson, Design principles of flux-switch alternators, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 74(3), 1261 1268, 1955. [6] T. J. E. Miller, Switched Reluctance Machines and Their Control. Hillsboro, OH: Magna Physics, 1993. [7] E. Sulaiman, T. Kosaka, Design Improvement and Performance Analysis of 12S-10P Permanent Magnet Flux Switching Machine with Field Excitation Coil, Journal of Electrical Systems(JES), 8(4), 425-432, 2012. [8] E. Sulaiman, Design Studies on Less Rare-Earth and High Power Density Flux Switching Motors with Hybrid Excitation / Wound Field Excitation for HEV Drives. Ph.D. thesis. Nagoya Institute of Technology Nagoya, Japan; 2012. [9] E. Sulaiman, M.Z. Ahmad, Z.A Haron, T. Kosaka, Design studies and performance of HEFSM with various slot-pole combinations for HEV applications. PECON 2012-2012 IEEE International Conference on Power and Energy. 424 929, 2012. [10] Y. Amara, L.Vido, M. Gabsi, E. Hoang, H A. Ben Ahmed, M. Lecrivain, Hybrid excitation synchronous machines: Energy-efficient solution for vehicles propulsion. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology. 58(5): 2137-2149. 2009. [11] R.L. Owen, Z.Q. Zhu, G.W. Jewell, Hybrid-Excited Flux-Switching Permanent-Magnet Machines with Iron Flux Bridges. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 46(6): 1726-1729, 2010. [12] Y. Luo, G. Hwang, and K. Liu, Design of synchronous reluctance motor, Electrical Electronics Insulation Conference, and Electrical Manufacturing & Coil Winding Conference. 373 379, 1995. [13] T. Lipo, Novel reluctance machine concepts for variable speed drives, in Proceedings Mediterranean Electrotech. Conference, 34-43, 1991. [14] A. Zulu, BC. Mecrow, M. A. Armstrong, A Wound-Field Three-Phase Flux-Switching Synchronous Motor With All Excitation Sources on the Stator. IEEE Transactions Industry Applications, IEEE Transactions, 46(6), 2363 2371, 2010. [15] H. A. Soomro, E. Sulaiman, F. Khan, Comparative Performance of FE-FSM, PM-FSM and HE-FSM with Segmental Rotor, Applied Mechanics and Materials (International Integrated Engineering Summit conference), 776-780, 2014. 52