Battery Pack Laboratory Testing Results

Similar documents
U.S. Department of Energy Vehicle Technologies Program

U.S. Department of Energy Vehicle Technologies Program. United States Advanced Battery Consortium Battery Test Manual For Electric Vehicles

Hybrid Electric Vehicle End-of-Life Testing On Honda Insights, Honda Gen I Civics and Toyota Gen I Priuses

Accelerated Testing of Advanced Battery Technologies in PHEV Applications

High Energy cell target specification for EV, PHEV and HEV-APU applications

High Power Battery Test Methods for Hybrid Vehicle Applications

gov October 2, 2014 Richard Barney Carlson Shawn Salisbury Matt Shirk John Smart

Research Report. FD807 Electric Vehicle Component Sizing vs. Vehicle Structural Weight Report

Lithium-Ion Batteries for Electric Cars: Elena Aleksandrova Honda R&D Europe (Deutschland) GmbH Automobile Advanced Technology Research

Battery Evaluation for Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles

48V Battery System Design for Mild Hybrid Applications. Angela Duren 11 February 2016

Phosphates in Li-ion batteries and automotive applications

Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle Control Strategy Parameter Optimization

Ming Cheng, Bo Chen, Michigan Technological University

Li-Ion Batteries for Low Voltage Applications. Christoph Fehrenbacher 19 October 2016

Optimal Control Strategy Design for Extending. Electric Vehicles (PHEVs)

PROCEDURE FOR PROVIDING INFORMATION, ETC. ABOUT FUEL CONSUMPTION PERFORMANCE OF PLUG-IN HYBRID ELECTRIC VEHICLES. Kokujikan No. 86 of July 30, 2009

Exploring Electric Vehicle Battery Charging Efficiency

BatPaC Version Dec2015 Tesla.xlsx, 2/4/16

Electric Mobility at Opel Strategy. Technology. The Ampera. Gerrit Riemer Adam Opel AG Director Future Mobility Mobilis 2012, Mulhouse

Environmental tests to improve durability of lithium-ion batteries Environmental test equipment considerations for reliability & safety testing

Design of a 14V nominal dual battery system. Audi AG, Gehrmann, Johannes

HCV - Hybrid Commercial Vehicle

INVENTION DISCLOSURE MECHANICAL SUBJECT MATTER EFFICIENCY ENHANCEMENT OF A NEW TWO-MOTOR HYBRID SYSTEM

Batteries for Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEVs): Goals and the State of Technology circa 2008

innovation at work The NanoSafe Battery Alan J. Gotcher, PhD President & CEO Altair Nanotechnologies, Inc. November 29 th, 2006 Research Manufacturing

Argonne Mobility Research Impending Electrification. Don Hillebrand Argonne National Laboratory

What consumers teach us about PHEVs, electric-drive and fuel economy

2010 Advanced Energy Conference. Electrification Technology and the Future of the Automobile. Mark Mathias

MECA0500: PLUG-IN HYBRID ELECTRIC VEHICLES. DESIGN AND CONTROL. Pierre Duysinx

and Electric Vehicles ECEN 2060

Sustainable Personal Electric Transportation: EVs, PHEVs, and FCVs Andrew Burke Institute of Transportation Studies University of California-Davis

Impact of Drive Cycles on PHEV Component Requirements

MODELING ELECTRIFIED VEHICLES UNDER DIFFERENT THERMAL CONDITIONS

arxiv:submit/ [math.gm] 27 Mar 2018

Energy Saving and Cost Projections for Advanced Hybrid, Battery Electric, and Fuel Cell Vehicles in

2011 Advanced Energy Conference -Buffalo, NY

PHEV Control Strategy Optimization Using MATLAB Distributed Computing: From Pattern to Tuning

Chapter 1: Battery management: State of charge

Using Trip Information for PHEV Fuel Consumption Minimization

Validation and Control Strategy to Reduce Fuel Consumption for RE-EV

12V Start-Stop and 48V Mild Hybrid LMO-LTO Batteries

Li-ion Batteries and Electric Vehicles

End-To-End Cell Pack System Solution: Rechargeable Lithium-Ion Battery

Why Hydrogen? Alec Brooks. Nov. 2, CARB Hydrogen Highway Network Workshop.

Investigation of CO 2 emissions in usage phase due to an electric vehicle - Study of battery degradation impact on emissions -

U.S. Army s Ground Vehicle Programs & Goals

DOERD March U.S. Advanced Battery Consortium In-Vehicle Battery Testing Procedure

FUTURE OF TRANSPORTATION TECHNOLOGIES

SIL, HIL, and Vehicle Fuel Economy Analysis of a Pre- Transmission Parallel PHEV

A VEHICLE SYSTEMS APPROACH TO EVALUATE PLUG-IN HYBRID BATTERY COLD START, LIFE AND COST ISSUES. A Record of Study NEERAJ SHRIPAD SHIDORE

High Power Bipolar Nickel Metal Hydride Battery for Utility Applications

Enhanced Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles

Li-CF x /MnO 2 Hybrid D-cell with Wide Operating Temperature Range for Military Batteries

CALL FOR A QUOTE (877)

Providing Choices for Sustainable Mobility. Takehito Yokoo Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc.

Lithium Power Cabinets

JEE4360 Energy Alternatives

State of Health Estimation for Lithium Ion Batteries NSERC Report for the UBC/JTT Engage Project

SB LiMotive Automotive Battery Technology. Kiho Kim

PROGRESS OF BATTERY SYSTEMS AT GENERAL MOTORS. Manfred Herrmann Roland Matthé. World Mobility Summit Munich October 2016

Background and Considerations for Planning Corridor Charging Marcy Rood, Argonne National Laboratory

System Advisor Model (SAM) SimpliPhi Power Battery Modeling Instructions

Electric Vehicle Charging Efficiency in Extremely High Temperatures

SimpliPhi Power PHI Battery

U.S. Department of Energy s Vehicle Technologies Program -

The xev Industry Insider Report

Modeling of Battery Systems and Installations for Automotive Applications

Plug-in Hybrid Vehicles

New energy for the future

Towards advanced BMS algorithms development for (P)HEV and EV by use of a physics-based model of Li-ion battery systems

Corporate presentation. LTS epropulsion

PHEV Conversion Kit User Manual

AFG Project Update Spring 2006 Semester 02/15/2006

René Uyttebroeck. Li-Ion batteries in passenger cars

The xev Industry Insider Report

Battery Capacity Versus Discharge Rate

Efficiency Enhancement of a New Two-Motor Hybrid System

Real Driving Emission and Fuel Consumption (for plug-in hybrids)

Modeling and thermal simulation of a PHEV battery module with cylindrical LFP cells

STUDY OF ENERGETIC BALANCE OF REGENERATIVE ELECTRIC VEHICLE IN A CITY DRIVING CYCLE

The BEEST: An Overview of ARPA-E s Program in Ultra-High Energy Batteries for Electrified Vehicles

Enphase AC Battery Parameters for NREL System Advisor Model (SAM)

Early Stage Vehicle Concept Design with GT-SUITE

HYBRID ELECTRIC VEHICLE SYSTEM MODELING AND CONTROL

PHEV: HEV with a larger battery to allow EV operation over a distance ( all electric range AER)

Impact of Battery Characteristics on PHEV Fuel Economy

AC dynamometer parameter download

SimpliPhi Power PHI Battery

SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005

Introduction: Supplied to 360 Test Labs... Battery packs as follows:

Impact of Advanced Technologies on Medium-Duty Trucks Fuel Efficiency

CONTENTS. Acknowledgements... vii. Notation... viii. Preface... xi. Abstract... xii. Executive Summary... 1

Sizing of Ultracapacitors and Batteries for a High Performance Electric Vehicle

HYDROGEN. Turning up the gas. Jon Hunt. Manager Alternative Fuels TOYOTA GB CCS HFC 2019

Fast Charging Tests (up to 6C) of Lithium Titanate Cells and Modules: Electrical and Thermal Response

James Goss, Mircea Popescu, Dave Staton. 11 October 2012, Stuttgart, Germany

Ageing Testing Procedures on Lithium Batteries in an International Collaboration Context

PHEV Conversion Kit Users Manual for Prius

HOPPECKE Lithium-ion battery systems

Transcription:

Battery Pack Laboratory Testing Results 2013 Toyota Prius Plug-in - VIN 8663 Vehicle Details and Battery Specifications¹ʹ² Vehicle Details Base Vehicle: 2013 Toyota Prius Plug-in Architecture: Plug-In Hybrid Electric Battery Specifications Manufacturer: Primearth EV Co. Type: Lithium-ion Number of Cells: 56 Nominal Cell/System Voltage: 3.7/207.2 V VIN: JTDKN3DP6D3038663 Rated Pack /Capacity: 4.4 kwh / 21.5 Ah Min/Max Cell Voltage: 3.00/4.15 V Pack Mass/Volume³: 79.8 kg, 124.0 L Thermal Management: Active - Forced Air ¹ Vehicle details and battery specifications were either supplied by the manufacturer or derived from a literature review ² For full vehicle specifications, see the Baseline Performance Testing Results for this vehicle ³ Battery pack volume is approximate and is based on the overall rectangular envelope less any significant voids Test Number Vehicle Odometer (Miles) Date of Test Measured Average Capacity (Ah) Measured Average Capacity (kwh) CD Usable Margin⁴ (Wh) CS Usable Margin⁴ (Wh) Baseline 4,640 6/7/2013 20.7 4.2-1,173.7-1,173.7 ICD 1 42,893 12/4/2013 20.0 4.1-1,079.8-1,079.8 ICD 2 94,705 12/5/2014 19.3 3.9-604.8-604.8 ICD 3 154,588 12/10/2015 19.0 3.9-700.0-700.0 End-of-Test Battery Laboratory Test Results Summary ⁴ The CD and CS Usable margins are defined as the difference between the battery usable energy values obtained from testing and the corresponding targets as defined in the Battery Test Manual for Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles. A negative margin value indicates performance below the target, however it does not necessarily indicate any deficiency in the performance of the battery as it was designed to operate by the vehicle manufacturer. Page 1 of 5

PHEV Battery Test Results Analysis Battery test results include those from the Static Capacity Test and the Hybrid Pulse Power Characterization (HPPC) Test, based on test procedures from the United States Advanced Battery Consortium Battery Test Manual For Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles at the time of testing. These tests were performed for the US Department of Vehicle Technology Office s Advanced Vehicle Testing Activity which is conducted by the Idaho National Laboratory and Intertek Testing Services, North America. Static Capacity Test Results The Static Capacity Test measures the charge and energy capacities of the battery between maximum and minimum pack voltages when discharged at a constant current calculated to approximate a 10 kw discharge rate.⁵ Pack voltage versus capacity discharged during the Static Capacity Test is shown in Figure 1. Three iterations of the Static Capacity Test are performed at each interval, and the average results from each interval test are shown in the test results summary table on page 1. Figure 1. Voltage versus capacity discharged during the static capacity test Hybrid Pulse Power Characterization Test Results The HPPC test is performed to characterize the discharge and charge pulse power capability of the battery at each 10-percent depth-of-discharge interval. Numerical results derived from the HPPC test results are summarized in the table on page 1, including comparison of the measured results to the United States Advanced Battery Consortium goals for PHEV batteries. The results from these tests are in relation to the targets for a Minimum PHEV Battery, having an equivalent electric range of 10 miles. ⁵ Discharge rate is determined by taking the average of the maximum and minimum voltage values for a particular pack and dividing that value into 10 kw, per the PHEV manual. For this vehicle, the value is 10kW / 200.2 V = 49.95 A. Page 2 of 5

Figures 2 and 3 illustrate the battery charge and discharge calculated pulse resistance, which indicate internal resistance at each 10-percent depth-of-discharge interval. Figure 2. Ten-second charge pulse resistance versus capacity discharged Figure 3. Ten-second discharge pulse resistance versus capacity discharged Page 3 of 5

Figure 4 shows the battery s 10-second charge and discharge pulse power capabilities as a function of energy discharged. The Minimum PHEV battery target performance goals of 45 kw discharge power and 30 kw charge power are shown as a dashed line. Note that the axes are scaled such that the charge and discharge pulse power goals align. Figure 4. Discharge and charge power capability versus energy discharged Page 4 of 5

Figure 5 shows the charge-depleting (CD) and charge-sustaining (CS) Usable curves, calculated using the methods from the PHEV battery test manual. The curves indicate the Usable as a function of discharge power. The two dotted horizontal lines show the USABC Minimum PHEV battery Available goals for CS and CD modes of 0.5 kwh and 3.4 kwh, respectively. The dotted vertical line shows the Minimum PHEV battery CS power target of 45 kw. CS and CD Available Energies are defined as the Usable points, on the y-axis, where each respective curve crosses the discharge power goal line. CS Available Power is defined as the discharge power point, on the x-axis, where the CS Usable curve crosses the CS energy goal line. Figure 5. Usable energy versus power Page 5 of 5