Transportation Land Development Environmental S e r v i c e s

Similar documents
Date: December 20, Project #:

Construction Realty Co.

Trip Generation Study: Provo Assisted Living Facility Land Use Code: 254

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado

Costco Gasoline Fuel Station Transportation Characteristics

Table 1: Existing Trip Generation A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Land Use ITE Code Intensity Daily Total In Out Total In Out

4/2/18 MP NORTHPOINT MALL GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES

TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN REPORT KING OF PRUSSIA ROAD & RAIDER ROAD RADNOR TOWNSHIP PENNSYLVANIA

appendix 4: Parking Management Study, Phase II

Proposed Inn at Bellefield Traffic Impact Assessment

Traffic Impact Analysis West Street Garden Plots Improvements and DuPage River Park Garden Plots Development Naperville, Illinois

Proposed CVS/pharmacy

Traffic Feasibility Study

Traffic, Transportation & Civil Engineering Ali R. Khorasani, P.E. P.O. Box 804, Spencer, MA 01562, Tel: (508)

Craig Scheffler, P.E., PTOE HNTB North Carolina, P.C. HNTB Project File: Subject

Heartland Town Square

Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis Turtle Creek Boulevard Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.

Proposed Hotel and Restaurant Development

Traffic Impact Study for Proposed Olive Boulevard Development

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

Traffic Impact Study for the proposed. Town of Allegany, New York. August Project No Prepared For:

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Traffic Generation November 28, Mr. Todd Baker Baker Properties, LLC 953 Islington Street Suite 23D Portsmouth, NH 03801

11 October 12, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT:

1. INTRODUCTION 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION CUBES SELF-STORAGE MILL CREEK TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT APPLICATION MULTI-UNIT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT FOURTH STREET NEAR BEDFORD HIGHWAY SUBMITTED BY: LYDON LYNCH ARCHITECTS

THE CORNERSTONE APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY R&M PROJECT NO

Traffic Impact Statement (TIS)

Parks and Transportation System Development Charge Methodology

Appendix S. Shared Parking Analysis

TRANSPORTATION REVIEW

Appendix 3. Transportation Narrative and Supplements

Downtown Lee s Summit Parking Study

West Hills Shopping Centre Lowe s Expansion Traffic Impact Study

Trip Generation & Parking Occupancy Data Collection: Grocery Stores Student Chapter of Institute of Transportation Engineers at UCLA Spring 2014

MEMO VIA . Ms. Amy Roth DPS Director, City of Three Rivers. To:

RE: Taggart Retail Site Plan: Kanata West Proposal for Traffic Impact Study: Addendum #2

APPENDIX TR-1 PARKING AND QUEUING ASSESSMENT

Traffic Impact Analysis. Alliance Cole Avenue Residential Site Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.

Proposed Lowe s Home Improvement Center

HUMC/Mountainside Hospital Redevelopment Plan

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY Purpose of Report and Study Objectives... 2

Trip and Parking Generation Data Collection at Grocery Store with Gas Station and Auto Repair

Appendix C Transportation. C-1: Chelsea Market Survey Results C-2: Transportation Demand Factors Memo C-3: Proposed Safety Improvements

Transportation & Traffic Engineering

RE: A Traffic Impact Statement for a proposed development on Quinpool Road

Ingraham High School Parking and Traffic Analysis

Mineola Village Green

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. USD #497 Warehouse and Bus Site

Address Land Use Approximate GSF

105 Toronto Street South, Markdale Transportation Impact Study. Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The valet operation, service area, and drop-off lanes provided will be adequate Page i

TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL REPORT

King County Metro. Columbia Street Transit Priority Improvements Alternative Analysis. Downtown Southend Transit Study. May 2014.

APPENDIX C-2. Traffic Study Supplemental Analysis Memo

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM. Part A: Introduction

MILLERSVILLE PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND

This letter summarizes our observations, anticipated traffic changes, and conclusions.

MERIVALE PRIORITY SQUARE 2852 MERIVALE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: ONT Inc. 25 Winding Way Nepean, Ontario K2C 3H1

MEMO 1. SITE LOCATION AND EXISTING USE. 2.1 Vehicle Access. Table 1: Vehicle Parking Requirements and Proposed Supply

East Stockton Boulevard (South Sacramento) Costco Gasoline Expansion Fuel Station Expansion Trip Generation Estimate

Traffic and Parking Study for an Athletic Recreation Center Janes Avenue Shopping Plaza Site Woodridge, Illinois

APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

V. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS F. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION

Transportation Impact Analysis for the Carolina North Development Executive Summary

APPENDIX G TRAFFIC STUDY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

D. J. Halpenny & Associates Ltd. Consulting Transportation Engineers

Re: Addendum No. 4 Transportation Overview 146 Mountshannon Drive Ottawa, Ontario

Appendix C. Traffic Study

DELICETO, LLC PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL

SPECIAL USE CRITERIA

Mercer Island Center for the Arts Parking Management Plan

Bennett Pit. Traffic Impact Study. J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado. March 3, 2017

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS L. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC

Colston Budd Rogers & Kafes Pty Ltd as Trustee for C & B Unit Trust ABN

DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY 1627 MAXIME STREET CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: Subhas Bhargava. July 9, Overview_1.

APPENDIX VMT Evaluation

Oakbrook Village Plaza City of Laguna Hills

Escondido Marriott Hotel and Mixed-Use Condominium Project TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT

Revised Strategy for Downtown Parking

Lacey Gateway Residential Phase 1

STAFF REPORT # CHANGE OF ZONING

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. for MILTON SQUARE

ARVADA TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

700 University Avenue Mixed-Use Development. Traffic Impact Analysis

Chevy Chase Lake. Preliminary Plan # B TRAFFIC STATEMENT. Prepared for: Chevy Chase Land Company & Bozzuto Development Company

Per Revised Concept Plan Residential Condo/Townhouse. Proposed Land Use per TIS

Traffic Impact Study Speedway Gas Station Redevelopment

Table 8-1: Service Frequencies for All Short-List Alternatives by Day of Week and Time of Day Frequency Day of Week Time of Day Time Period

Citizens Committee for Facilities

Trip Generation and Parking Utilization Data Collection at Mini-Mart with Gas Station

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. McDONALD S RESTAURANT IN CARMICAEL Sacramento County, CA. Prepared For:

NEWCASTLE MIDDLE SCHOOL Traffic Impact Analysis

Trip Generation and Parking Study New Californian Apartments, Berkeley

TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR THE 8899 BEVERLY BOULEVARD PROJECT

Site Traffic Studies:

TRAFFIC AND PARKING ASSESSMENT FOR PROPOSED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT 2250 COMMERCIAL DRIVE, VANCOUVER

April 7, Mr. Blake Shutler Compass Homes Development LLC Summit Homes Construction, LLC PO Box 6539 Dillon, CO 80435

Traffic Impact Analysis 5742 BEACH BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT

Transcription:

Transportation Land Development Environmental S e r v i c e s Memorandum To: Ms. Kristin E. Kassner Planning Director Town Hall Annex 25 Center Street Burlington, MA 01803 Date: September 23, 2013 Project No.: 12313.00 101 Walnut Street P. O. Box 9151 Watertown, MA 02471-9151 617 924 1770 FAX 617 924 2286 From: Vinod Kalikiri, PE, PTOE Re: Proposed Cinema Renovations and Outparcel Restaurant Burlington, Massachusetts TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY On behalf of the Applicant, ND Burlington South Avenue LLC (National Development), Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. (VHB) has prepared this memorandum to summarize the trip generation analysis prepared in support of the proposed renovations to the existing AMC multiplex cinema and the construction of a new outparcel restaurant on South Avenue (the Project). PROJECT DESCRIPTION The existing cinema is located at 20 South Avenue on an approximately 6.2-acre parcel of land. The parcel is generally bounded by Middlesex Turnpike to the east, South Avenue to the south and west and an extended stay hotel to the north. The cinema has approximately 2,400 seats and 10 screens. In addition to 332 parking spaces immediately surrounding the cinema building, additional parking for the cinema patrons is accommodated in a 316-space overflow parking lot located on a separate, 3.4- acre parcel of land located to the south of South Avenue (at 15 South Avenue). Between the two parcels, total existing parking supply for the cinema is 648 spaces. 20 South Avenue has two stopcontrolled curb cuts, one on each leg of South Avenue. 15 South Avenue has two stop-controlled curb cuts on the south side of South Avenue. The Applicant proposes to renovate the cinema and reduce the seat count to 1,008 seats with 10 screens, which represents a 58-percent reduction in the number of seats. The existing perpendicular parking to the north of the cinema building will be slightly reconfigured to result in a total of 337 parking spaces for the cinema patrons at 20 South Avenue. The two existing curb cuts for the cinema parcel will be maintained in their current configuration. After the proposed seat reduction at the cinema and reconfiguration of its parking at 20 South Avenue, overflow parking at 15 South Avenue will no longer be needed for the cinema patrons. The Applicant therefore proposes to construct an 8,650± square-foot (sf), 294-seat restaurant at 15 South Avenue. The total restaurant seat count includes 192 indoor seats and 102 outdoor seats on a covered patio. The restaurant size noted above includes approximately 6,900± sf of indoor seating, a 1,200 ± sf covered patio and a 550± sf trash enclosure. A total of 145 parking spaces will be provided for the restaurant patrons at 15 South Avenue. The easterly existing curb cut for 15 South Avenue will be \\vhb\proj\wat-ld\12313.00\docs\memos\traffic\12313.00trafficmemo-final.doc

Date: September 23, 2013 Project No.: 12313.00 2 closed and the westerly curb cut will be reconfigured to serve the restaurant traffic. Pedestrian sidewalk and crosswalk improvements are proposed as part of the Project to improve pedestrian flow between the two uses. Under current conditions, traffic exiting the cinema after each show is directed to travel in a clockwise movement via South Avenue and Second Avenue to Middlesex Turnpike in order to minimize conflicts with vehicles entering the cinema via the South Avenue/Middlesex Turnpike intersection. As part of an on-going and unrelated adjacent project (Keurig), the existing one-way restriction on South Avenue adjacent to the Site will be removed which will allow two-way traffic operations along the full length of South Avenue in the future. Thus, traffic arriving at the cinema and the proposed restaurant will have the option of either using the South Avenue/Middlesex Turnpike intersection or the Second Avenue/ Middlesex Turnpike intersection. The improvements proposed on South Avenue by the Keurig project have been taken into consideration when developing the access/circulation patterns for the Project. TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON As noted previously, the Project includes a 58-percent reduction in the seat count at the cinema. Since the number of screens will not change and movie start/end times will generally remain consistent with the current operations, it can be expected that the reduction in the seat count represents a direct reduction in the trip generation estimates for the cinema. The purpose of the trip generation analysis presented in this document is to compare the cinema trip reduction with the increase in traffic associated with the proposed restaurant use, which ultimately determines whether the Project will represent a net increase or decrease in traffic on area roadways in the future. Trip estimates for the existing and proposed uses are based on guidelines in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation 1 manual. Specifically, trip rates for ITE Land Use Codes (LUC) 445 (multiplex cinema) and LUC 932 (high turnover sit-down restaurant) were used in the analysis. Peak traffic for uses such as cinemas and restaurants generally does not occur at the same time as the roadway peak hours (i.e., during the commuter peak hours on weekdays and retail peak hour during Saturday midday). Therefore, trip generation estimates for the Project were developed for both the roadway peak hours as well as the site peak hours to ensure that all potential peak times are covered. Table 1 summarizes the trip generation analysis. Detailed calculation worksheets are included in the attachment to this memorandum. It should be noted that the presence of two compatible and complimentary uses such as a cinema and a restaurant, across from each other and with well defined vehicular and pedestrian connections, will result in some degree sharing of trips between the two uses. For example, a cinema patron may choose to visit the restaurant before/after the movie. Similarly, a customer at the restaurant may decide to watch a movie after dining at the restaurant. This sharing of trips between compatible land uses is known as internal capture of trips as it does not represent additional traffic on the area roadway system. As part of the trip generation analysis for the Project, internal trip capture between the cinema and the restaurant was estimated based on the methodology outlined in the ITE Trip Generation Handbook. The estimated internal capture trips were subtracted from the gross trip estimates for the two uses to develop the net trip generation for the future conditions. The internal capture results are included in Table 1 and the corresponding calculation worksheets are included in the attachment to this memorandum. 1 Trip Generation; Ninth Edition; Institute of Transportation Engineers; Washington, D.C.; 2012 \\vhb\proj\wat-ld\12313.00\docs\memos\traffic\12313.00trafficmemo-final.doc

Date: September 23, 2013 Project No.: 12313.00 3 Table 1: Peak Hour Trip Generation Summary Evening Peak Hour - Roadway Peak Existing Cinema Future Cinema Future Restaurant Internal Capture Total Future Trips Change in Trips from the Existing Conditions Enter 69 29 69 6 92 23 Exit 123 52 52 6 98-25 Total 192 81 121 12 190-2 Evening Peak Hour - Generator Peak Enter 343 144 110 11 243-100 Exit 329 138 102 11 229-100 Total 672 282 212 2 472-200 Saturday Peak Hour - Roadway Peak Enter 156 66 83 8 141-15 Exit 60 25 73 8 90 30 Total 216 91 156 17 231 15 Saturday Peak Hour - Generator Peak Enter 374 157 83 8 232-142 Exit 346 145 73 8 210-136 Total 720 302 156 16 442-278 A Negative trip estimate represents a reduction in trips when compared to the existing condition Note: see detailed worksheets in the attachment to this memorandum for the analysis inputs and assumptions that formed the basis of the above summary A review of the trip generation analysis summary in Table 1 leads to the following findings. During the roadway peak hours (i.e., during the commuter peak hours on weekdays and retail peak hour during the midday on Saturdays), the combination of the smaller cinema and the new restaurant would generate approximately the same level of traffic as the existing 2,400-seat cinema. i.e., traffic operations on area roadways can be expected to be minimally affected by the Project during the times when the roadway traffic peaks. Conservatively assuming that the individual site peak hours of the cinema and the restaurant occur at the same time (worst case assumption), the sum of the traffic generated during the site peaks represents an approximately 29 to 39 percent reduction in traffic, when compared to the corresponding peak hour of the existing cinema use. Alternately, if the peaks of the uses occur at different times, comparison to the existing cinema site peak would represent an even bigger trip reduction than the percentages suggested above. Overall, the Project represents no noticeable change in trip generation during the roadway peak hours and a significant reduction in trip generation during the site peak hours, when compared to the existing conditions. ATTACHMENTS: Trip generation worksheets Internal trip calculation worksheets \\vhb\proj\wat-ld\12313.00\docs\memos\traffic\12313.00trafficmemo-final.doc

Project Information Project Name: AMC / EXISTING No: 12313 Date: 9/16/2013 City: Burlington State/Province: MA Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: ND Analyst's Name: VK Edition: 9th Land Use Size PM roadway peak hour PM Generator peak Saturday midday roadway peak hour Saturday generator peak hour Entry Exit Entry Exit Entry Exit Entry Exit 445 Multiplex Movie Theater 2400 Seats 69 123 343 329 156 60 374 346 Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass by 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non pass by 69 123 343 329 156 60 374 346 Total 69 123 343 329 156 60 374 346 Total Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Pass by 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Non pass by 69 123 343 329 156 60 374 346

Project Information Project Name: AMC / Proposed Cinema No: 12313 Date: 9/16/2013 City: Burlington State/Province: MA Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: ND Analyst's Name: VK Edition: 9th Land Use Size PM roadway peak hour PM Generator Peak Hour Saturday Generator Peak Hour Saturday Midday roadway peak hour Entry Exit Entry Exit Entry Exit Entry Exit 445 Multiplex Movie Theater 1008 Seats 29 52 144 138 157 145 66 25 Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass by 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non pass by 29 52 144 138 157 145 66 25 Total 29 52 144 138 157 145 66 25 Total Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Pass by 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Non pass by 29 52 144 138 157 145 66 25

Project Information Project Name: AMC / Restaurant use Seats No: 12313 Date: 9/17/2013 City: Burlington State/Province: MA Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: ND Analyst's Name: VK Edition: 9th Land Use Size Weekday daily PM Roadway peak hour PM generator peak hour Saturday daily Saturday Generator peak hour Entry Exit Entry Exit Entry Exit Entry Exit Entry Exit 932 High Turnover (Sit Down) Restaurant 294 Seats 710 710 69 52 110 102 913 913 83 73 Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass by 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non pass by 710 710 69 52 110 102 913 913 83 73 Total 710 710 69 52 110 102 913 913 83 73 Total Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Pass by 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Non pass by 710 710 69 52 110 102 913 913 83 73

ITE Internal Capture Rate Calculation Job Name: AMC Job Number: 12313.00 Analyst: VK Date: 9/17/2013 Land Use A Time Period: Wkday PM - Roadway Peak ITE LUC Size: 1,008 Cinema Seats Exit to External Total Internal External 50 Enter 29 4 25 25 Exit 52 2 50 Enter from External Total 81 6 75 % 100% 8% 92% 31% 16 32% 9 0 0 2 4 0 0 Balanced Balanced Balanced Balanced 3% 2 8% 4 0 0 Land Use B Land Use C ITE LUC Size: 294 Seats Demand Balanced Demand ITE LUC Size: Restaurant Exit to External Total Internal External 0 0 0 Total Internal External Enter from External 48 Enter 69 2 67 0 0 0 Enter 0 0 0 67 Exit 52 4 48 Exit 0 0 0 Enter from External Total 121 6 115 Demand Balanced Demand Total 0 0 0 Exit to External % 100% 5% 95% % 100% #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Net External Trips for Multi-Use Development Land Use A Land Use B Land Use C Total Enter 25 67 0 92 Exit 50 48 0 98 Total 75 115 0 190 Internal Capture Rate Single-Use Trip Gen. Est. 81 121 0 202 6% DIFFERENCE 6 6 \\mawald\ld\08167\ssheets\summary.xlsx Shared PM Rdway Pk last updated: 09/15/03

ITE Internal Capture Rate Calculation Job Name: AMC Job Number: 12313.00 Analyst: VK Date: 9/17/2013 Land Use A Time Period: Wkday PM - Generator Peak ITE LUC Size: 1,008 Cinema Seats Exit to External Total Internal External 135 Enter 144 8 136 136 Exit 138 3 135 Enter from External Total 282 11 271 % 100% 4% 96% 31% 43 32% 46 0 0 3 8 0 0 Balanced Balanced Balanced Balanced 3% 3 8% 8 0 0 Land Use B Land Use C ITE LUC Size: 294 Seats Demand Balanced Demand ITE LUC Size: Restaurant Exit to External Total Internal External 0 0 0 Total Internal External Enter from External 94 Enter 110 3 107 0 0 0 Enter 0 0 0 107 Exit 102 8 94 Exit 0 0 0 Enter from External Total 212 11 201 Demand Balanced Demand Total 0 0 0 Exit to External % 100% 5% 95% % 100% #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Net External Trips for Multi-Use Development Land Use A Land Use B Land Use C Total Enter 136 107 0 243 Exit 135 94 0 229 Total 271 201 0 471 Internal Capture Rate Single-Use Trip Gen. Est. 282 212 0 494 5% DIFFERENCE 11 11 \\mawald\ld\08167\ssheets\summary.xlsx Shared PM Gen Pk last updated: 09/15/03

ITE Internal Capture Rate Calculation Job Name: AMC Job Number: 12313.00 Analyst: VK Date: 9/17/2013 Land Use A Time Period: Saturday - Roadway Peak ITE LUC Size: 1,008 Cinema Seats Exit to External Total Internal External 23 Enter 66 6 60 60 Exit 25 2 23 Enter from External Total 91 8 83 % 100% 9% 91% 31% 8 32% 21 0 0 2 6 0 0 Balanced Balanced Balanced Balanced 3% 2 8% 6 0 0 Land Use B Land Use C ITE LUC Size: 294 Seats Demand Balanced Demand ITE LUC Size: Restaurant Exit to External Total Internal External 0 0 0 Total Internal External Enter from External 67 Enter 83 2 81 0 0 0 Enter 0 0 0 81 Exit 73 6 67 Exit 0 0 0 Enter from External Total 156 8 148 Demand Balanced Demand Total 0 0 0 Exit to External % 100% 5% 95% % 100% #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Net External Trips for Multi-Use Development Land Use A Land Use B Land Use C Total Enter 60 81 0 141 Exit 23 67 0 90 Total 83 148 0 230 Internal Capture Rate Single-Use Trip Gen. Est. 91 156 0 247 7% DIFFERENCE 8 8 \\mawald\ld\08167\ssheets\summary.xlsx Shared Sat Rdway Pk last updated: 09/15/03

ITE Internal Capture Rate Calculation Job Name: AMC Job Number: 12313.00 Analyst: VK Date: 9/17/2013 Land Use A Time Period: Saturday generator peak ITE LUC Size: 1,008 Cinema Seats Exit to External Total Internal External 143 Enter 157 6 151 151 Exit 145 2 143 Enter from External Total 302 8 294 % 100% 3% 97% 31% 45 32% 50 0 0 2 6 0 0 Balanced Balanced Balanced Balanced 3% 2 8% 6 0 0 Land Use B Land Use C ITE LUC Size: 294 Seats Demand Balanced Demand ITE LUC Size: Restaurant Exit to External Total Internal External 0 0 0 Total Internal External Enter from External 67 Enter 83 2 81 0 0 0 Enter 0 0 0 81 Exit 73 6 67 Exit 0 0 0 Enter from External Total 156 8 148 Demand Balanced Demand Total 0 0 0 Exit to External % 100% 5% 95% % 100% #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Net External Trips for Multi-Use Development Land Use A Land Use B Land Use C Total Enter 151 81 0 232 Exit 143 67 0 210 Total 294 148 0 441 Internal Capture Rate Single-Use Trip Gen. Est. 302 156 0 458 4% DIFFERENCE 8 8 \\mawald\ld\08167\ssheets\summary.xlsx Shared Sat Gen Pk last updated: 09/15/03