Calculation of Fuel Consumption and Exhaust Emissions from Ship in Ice Conditions

Similar documents
Development of Direct Drive Marine Propulsion Dual Fuel Engine "Niigata 28AHX-DF" Zhide XU Niigata Power Systems Co., Ltd.

MARINTEK The Norwegian Marine Technology Research Institute

Marin gas logistics. Work package 5. D5-5 Environmental studies - assessment of air emissions in terminal ports

NOx Reduction Technologies for 2-stroke Diesel Engines to Meet IMO Tier III

Approaches to control air pollution from ports and ships

8 th AVL Large Engines Techdays Fusion of Hybrid and LNG

PAME Working Group. Emission reductions in shipping. Soffia Gudmundsdottir, PAME Executive Secretary

Methanol as an Alternative Marine Fuel. 6th Chemical & Product Tanker Conference. London 12th March 2014 Ulf T Freudendahl

GASEOUS FUELS SAFETY ASPECTS

KAWASAKI Environment-friendly New engine technology

EMR AND INVERSION-BASED CONTROL OF A SERIES HYBRID ELECTRIC EXCURSION SHIP

Pollution & GHG emissions from ships. Development of market-based. Marine Environment Division - IMO

Bulker and Tanker in Open Water and in Ice Dipl.-Ing. F. Mewis, HSVA Dipl.-Ing. J.-H. Hellmann, HSVA

Extent of Delivery. Extent of Delivery / Order Specifications W-X82-B & W-X92 Engines. Instructions. All quantities to be stated for one vessel

Kappel Propellers and Other Efficiency Improving Devices. Presentation by MAN Diesel & Turbo

Shipping and Environmental Challenges MARINTEK 1

Extent of Delivery. W-X35-B/40-B Engines. Extent of Delivery / Order Specifications. Instructions. All quantities to be stated for one vessel

Implications Across the Supply Chain. Prepared for Sustainableshipping Conference San Francisco 30 September 2009

The Challenge for Today s Shipbuilding Companies

Methodologies for emission inventories for shipping. Jana Moldanová IVL, Swedish Environmental Research Institute

Sustainable Development IMO s Contribution Beyond Rio+20

The Third IMO GHG Study 2014

DSME GreenShip 18,000 TEU Container Carrier. Oh-Yig Kwon / Director Marketing Engineering Team, DSME Seoul May 12, 2011

copyright c 2014 Hyundai Heavy Industries A Jan. 2014

Prof. Mustafa Insel HİDROTEKNİK Nautical Design Development. A Decision Support System for Energy Efficient Propulsion MARENER WMU

WFS MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES MARINE MACHINERY & ENGINE CO., LTD. All Rights Reserved.

News & Updates on MAN Dual Fuel Engines. Colin Peesel Sales Manager Engine & Marine Systems Inspectors Day Bremen,

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS parts I & II. B.S. Tselentis Department of Maritime Studies University of Piraeus

Putting the Right Foot Forward: Strategies for Reducing Costs and Carbon Footprints

Effect of cavitation during propeller ice interaction. Rod Sampson Emerson Cavitation Tunnel, University of Newcastle, UK

ON BOARD MEASUREMENTS OF SCRUBBER

INTEGRATION TRENDS OF PROPULSION SYSTEMS

ROSATOMFLOT. The Navigation on the Northern Sea Route Today & in the Future

3. Steam Turbines and Boilers

Retrofitting existing propulsion installations fitted with a synchronous generator into a variable speed generator

2009 Air Emissions Inventory

Opening keynote: Setting the scene the shipowners and shipmanagers point of view

WÄRTSILÄ DF: PRESENT AND FUTURE OF THE LNG FUELLED VESSELS

5 TH CIMAC CASCADES, BUSAN MARCEL OTT

Hydrodynamic Optimization of Ships

Alf Kåre Ådnanes; ABB BU Marine & Cranes, 2010-November Energy efficiency and fuel consumption of marine and offshore vessels Technical possibilities

About us. In this brochure we are pleased to present one of our latest innovations the Becker Mewis Duct.

Gas Fuelled Container Ship

Heavy Fuel Oil use by Fishing Vessels in the IMO Polar Code Arctic, 2015

we make you break the ice

SECTION 2 OCEAN-GOING VESSELS

WE MAKE YOU BREAK THE ICE

LNG: Legal and regulatory framework. Canepa Monica World Maritime University

SOLVANG ASA. Emission reduction technologies---advantages and disadvantages Fleet director Tor Øyvind Ask

NEVA 2013 MARINTEC CHINA IN THIS ISSUE: Dear reader,

End users perspective

An update on MTCC Caribbean s Pilot Projects: Preliminary Results of Data Collection Stephan Nanan

Outlook for Marine Bunkers and Fuel Oil to A key to understanding the future of marine bunkers and fuel oil markets

Fuel efficient tanker design. Karsten Hochkirch DNV GL SE Germany

Hybrid Drive for Commercial Vessels. Main engines 400 kw kw

Future Prospects of the Northern Sea Route as an International Trade Route

Propulsion of VLCC Introduction

Effect of SOx and NOx Regulation Implementation, ECA s and NOx Tier III Current Developments in General

The Chances and Potentials for Low-Voltage Hybrid Solutions in Ultra-Light Vehicles

ST. VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES

Green Ship of the Future. Green Ship of the Future -

Propulsion of 30,000 dwt. Handysize Bulk Carrier

ECO optimization with NOx equipment

Improved Efficiency and Reduced CO 2

V-POD electric propulsion & maneuvering system

An assessment of the potential feasibility for Oil Transit using the Arctic Northern Sea Route compared to the the Suez Canal

Extent of Delivery. Extent of Delivery / Order Specifications W-XDF Engines. Instructions. All quantities to be stated for one vessel

Low Speed Engine Room W-Xpert W-X72 Simulator

LNG fuel as an alternative to low-sulphur marine gas oil for complying with the new emission rules. September 29 th, 2017 Limassol

Challenges for sustainable freight transport Maritime transport. Elena Seco Gª Valdecasas Director Spanish Shipowners Association - ANAVE

Numerical methods for assessment of the ship's pollutant emissions

Alaska Deep-draft Arctic Ports Planning Charrette

E-class. Evolved design with focus on Efficiency and Environmental care

MARPOL Annex VI prevention of air pollution from ships

APPLICATION TO A CHEMICAL TANKER

Internationaler Congress für Schiffstechnik

Engines Portfolio Marine. Unrestricted Siemens AG 2018

Ship Energy Efficiency and Air Pollution. Ernestos Tzannatos Department of Maritime Studies University of Piraeus

Going the Dual Fuel Route

Compact State of the Art Methanol as a Marine Fuel. Göteborg 8th May 2014 Ulf T Freudendahl

Case study -MARPOL emission standards ECA Compliance. Your Trusted Partner

T24 T m3 Chemical and Oil Product Tanker

Dr Diamantis Andriotis, Technical Manager, Stealth Maritime Corporation SA

The Voice of International Merchant Shipping

ECA Compliance & PM. Thomas Kirk Director of Environmental Programs. Ottawa, Canada 9 September 2014

The Analysis and Research on Cost Advantages of Ships Sailing on Arctic NEP

External Costs of Maritime Shipping in Europe

ANNEX 5 RESOLUTION MEPC.254(67) Adopted on 17 October GUIDELINES ON SURVEY AND CERTIFICATION OF THE ENERGY EFFICIENCY DESIGN INDEX (EEDI)

Field experience with considerably reduced NOx and Smoke Emissions

Promoting sustainable industry

ME-GI/ME-LGI Applications and references

Supporting Information

5500 TEU CONTAINER VESSELS (ANS SERIES)

Emerging Environmental Rules & ECA Compliance

DEVELOPMENT OPTIONS FOR A&R SHIPYARD HARBOUR. Kaur Tull

C. Christen, D. Brand, CIMAC 2013 Simulation-based study on turbocharging dual-fuel engines Paper no. 187

Existing Design Trends for Tankers and Bulk Carriers - Design Changes for Improvement of the EEDI in the Future

Microturbine Marine Energy. The Ultimate Technology for SuperYachts.

Review of the Technical Specifications for the BCFS Intermediate Class Ferry and the provisions of the BC Ferry Commission Order 13-01

IN-SERVICE-MONITORING FOR NRMM USING SEMS, PARAMETER AND REPORTING OPTIONS

Transcription:

Calculation of Fuel Consumption and Exhaust Emissions from Ship in Ice Conditions Master Thesis Student Supervisor : Duong Quang Tan : Prof. Tadeusz Graczyk, ZUT Dipl.-Ing. Nils Reimer, HSVA

OUTLINE Introduction Methodology Considerations Calculation of Fuel Consumption and Exhaust Emissions Results Conclusions Calculation of Fuel Consumption and Exhaust Emissions from Ship in Ice Conditions 2

INTRODUCTION The working topic is studied at the Hamburg Ship Model Basin HSVA (Hamburg, Germany), and is part of the ACCESS project (Arctic Climate Change, Economy and Society), an European Project supported within the Ocean of Tomorrow call of the European Commission Seventh Framework Program Calculation of fuel consumption and exhaust emissions for various ship types as a function of power and speed in various ice conditions Arctic area condition, along the Northern Sea Route Calculation of Fuel Consumption and Exhaust Emissions from Ship in Ice Conditions 3

METHODOLOGY Calculation of Fuel Consumption and Exhaust Emissions from Ship in Ice Conditions 4

CONSIDERATIONS Ship type: Bulk carrier, Tanker, LNG carrier Propeller type: CPP, FPP, Podded Azimuth Transmission type: direct shaft line, electric propulsion Engine type: fuel oil Calculation of Fuel Consumption and Exhaust Emissions from Ship in Ice Conditions 5

CONSIDERATIONS Four difference routes: Murmansk to Bering Strait via Kara gate and south of Novosiberian Island Murmansk to Bering Strait via Kara gate and north of Novosiberian Island Murmansk to Bering Strait via north of Novaya Zemlya and south of Novosiberian Island Murmansk to Bering Strait via north of Novaya Zemlya and north of Novosiberian Island Ice conditions: September 2 November 2 September 27 November 27 Calculation of Fuel Consumption and Exhaust Emissions from Ship in Ice Conditions 6

ROUTES Route 1: Murmansk to Bering Strait via Kara Gate and passing south of Novosiberian Island (total distance 317.76 nm) Calculation of Fuel Consumption and Exhaust Emissions from Ship in Ice Conditions 7

ROUTES Route 2: Murmansk to Bering Strait via Kara Gate and passing north of Novosiberian Island (total distance 2976.94 nm) Calculation of Fuel Consumption and Exhaust Emissions from Ship in Ice Conditions 8

ROUTES Route 3: Murmansk to Bering Strait via north of Novaya Zemlya and passing south of Novosiberian Island (total distance 2842.6 nm) Calculation of Fuel Consumption and Exhaust Emissions from Ship in Ice Conditions 9

ROUTES Route 4: Murmansk to Bering Strait via north of Novaya Zemlya and passing north of Novosiberian Island (total distance 281.78 nm) Calculation of Fuel Consumption and Exhaust Emissions from Ship in Ice Conditions 1

CONSIDERATIONS Emission factors are taken from IMO study 29 Emission factors g/kg fuel (*) g/kwh % CO2 326 561.5 6.467 CO 7.4 1.3.15 NOx 78 13.65.157 SOx 54 9.45.19 BC.35.6.1 OC 1.7.19.2 PM 5.3.93.11 Calculation of Fuel Consumption and Exhaust Emissions from Ship in Ice Conditions 11

Fuel Consumption Total Fuel Consumption (tons) = Power (kw) x SFC (g/kwh) x Time (h) x 1-6 Calculation of Fuel Consumption and Exhaust Emissions from Ship in Ice Conditions 12

Exhaust Emissions Exhaust gas (kg) = Total fuel (kg) x Emission factor (g/kg fuel) x 1-3 Calculation of Fuel Consumption and Exhaust Emissions from Ship in Ice Conditions 13

RESULTS Calculation of Fuel Consumption and Exhaust Emissions from Ship in Ice Conditions 14

Result: Travel time (days) Bulk Carrier Tanker 1 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 299,9 318,3 286,4 34,6 51,3 13,3 2,8 8,8 11,6 21,1 8,6 19,5 16,5 8,2 19,3 8,1 25 2 15 1 5 19,5 18,6 17, 16,9 17,7 16,7 15,8 15,5 12,2 11,5 1,6 9,8 8,1 8, 7,6 7,5 45 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 Tanker 2 39 4 35 37 37 38 37 37 31 28 26 26 24 24 21 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 LNG Carrier 14,7 14,4 14,5 14,2 13,2 12,9 12,9 12,7 1,1 9,5 8,7 8,1 6,4 6,4 6,1 6, Sep- Nov- Sep-7 Nov-7 Sep- Nov- Sep-7 Nov-7

Result: Fuel consumption (tons) Bulk carrier Tanker 1 12 1 8 7816 125 756 9696 12 1 8 912 122 885 983 6 4 6 4 518 518 458 488 511 511 457 487 491 481479 389 2 159 321 334461 328 329461 425 314355 31453 2 12 1 8 6 4 Tanker 2 996 955 78 788 416 49 45 326 351 34 346 327 33324 348 326 12 1 8 6 4 LNG Carrier 197 183 944949 936 969 894 882 818 817 741 733 596 591 61 531 2 2 Sep- Nov- Sep-7 Nov-7 Sep- Nov- Sep-7 Nov-7

Result: Fuel per day (tons/day) Bulk carrier Tanker 1 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 38 38 38 38 31 32 28 26 26 24 22 23 22 22 21 21 7 6 5 4 3 2 64 64 64 64 49 56 52 52 5 46 37 4 3 31 31 25 5 1 45 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 Tanker 2 39 4 35 37 37 38 37 37 31 28 26 26 24 24 21 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 LNG Carrier 147 147 147 147 11 94 84 73 76 77 74 64 48 41 42 41 Sep- Nov- Sep-7 Nov-7 Sep- Nov- Sep-7 Nov-7

Exhaust Emissions CO 2 CO NOx SOx BC OC PM (tons) (tons) (tons) (tons) (tons) (tons) (tons) Sep- Route 1 1468.2 3.39 35.72 24.73.16.49 2.43 Route 2 1563.3 3.61 38.3 26.33.17.52 2.58 Route 3 1463.9 3.38 35.62 24.66.16.49 2.42 Route 4 1574.8 3.63 38.31 26.53.17.53 2.6 Nov- Route 1 2923.8 6.75 71.13 49.25.32.98 4.83 Route 2 3274.8 7.56 79.67 55.16.36 1.9 5.41 Route 3 2837.6 6.55 69.4 47.79.31.95 4.69 Route 4 3152.6 7.28 76.7 53.1.34 1.5 5.21 Sep-7 Route 1 1661.9 3.84 4.43 27.99.18.55 2.75 Route 2 1637.4 3.78 39.84 27.58.18.55 2.71 Route 3 1562.6 3.61 38.2 26.32.17.52 2.58 Route 4 1541.1 3.56 37.49 25.96.17.51 2.55 Nov-7 Route 1 1661.2 3.83 4.42 27.98.18.55 2.75 Route 2 1638.9 3.78 39.87 27.61.18.55 2.71 Route 3 1246.2 2.88 3.32 2.99.14.42 2.6 Route 4 1533.9 3.54 37.32 25.84.17.51 2.54 Calculation of Fuel Consumption and Exhaust Emissions from Ship in Ice Conditions 18

CONCLUSIONS Speed and ice condition are two main parameters which affect the fuel consumption. In tough ice the resistance is increased and the speed is reduced, the required power is higher than in open water. If there is no ice the ship will run faster and also consume more fuel. Higher fuel consumption might occur at high speed and low ice conditions as well as in tough ice at lower speed. Calculation of Fuel Consumption and Exhaust Emissions from Ship in Ice Conditions 19

Further Works Collect emission factors data Collect ship data: number of vessels, ship characteristics Develop a method to estimate the results with less parameters Calculation of Fuel Consumption and Exhaust Emissions from Ship in Ice Conditions 2

Thank you for your attention!

g/kwh Improvement to the program Newly added input interface Standard BSFC at MCR 6 5 y = 661,6x 6-2524x 5 + 23791x 4-11985x 3 + 183,2x 2 + 34,12x - 36,733 4 3 2 1-1 -2,2,4,6,8 1 1,2 P/P MCR Calculation of Fuel Consumption and Exhaust Emissions from Ship in Ice Conditions 22

Travel times (Tanker 2: CPP) P/D=.624 P/D=.79 3 25 2 15 1 5 25,6 23,6 22, 2,8 17,5 17,2 15,8 15,5 13,4 12, 12,7 11,4 9,6 9,5 9, 8,9 35 3 25 2 15 1 5 31,9 3,2 24,5 21,8 17,1 16,8 15,4 15,1 12,5 11, 11,8 1,3 8,4 8,3 7,9 7,8 2 18 16 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 P/D=.877 184,1 181,5 48,3 46, 12,3 17, 8,1 1,7 16,7 8, 11,9 15,3 7,7 1,7 15, 7,5 Sep- Nov- Sep-7 Nov-7 23

Fuel consumption (Tanker 2: CPP) P/D=.624 P/D=.79 12 1 996 955 14 12 1283 1254 8 6 4 78 788 416 49 45 326 351 34 346 327 33324 348 326 1 8 6 4 923 866 413439 366 386 47432 365 389 39 43 348 383 2 2 7 661 P/D=.877 6552 6 5 4 3 2 1713 1677 1 387 429454 411 425447 39 45361 43 399445 Sep- Nov- Sep-7 Nov-7 24

Fuel per day (Tanker 2: CPP) P/D=.624 P/D=.79 45 6 4 35 3 25 2 15 4 39 35 37 37 38 37 37 31 28 26 26 24 24 21 5 4 3 2 49 49 49 49 4 4 42 38 38 35 29 31 29 26 26 23 1 5 1 6 P/D=.877 5 53 53 53 53 4 3 2 38 4 35 36 36 36 31 33 3 27 27 24 1 Sep- Nov- Sep-7 Nov-7 25